Combination therapy of cyclosporine and anti-tumor necrosis factor α in psoriasis: a case series of 10 patients

Current Treatments for Generalized Pustular Psoriasis: A Narrative Summary of a Systematic Literature Search

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare, chronic and potentially life-threatening autoinflammatory skin disease characterized by widespread eruption of sterile pustules, with or without systemic inflammation. GPP can significantly reduce patients' quality of life (QoL). Several therapeutic approaches have been described in the literature, but there is no consensus on optimal treatment. In this review, we summarize published literature on efficacy, safety and QoL outcomes associated with current treatment of GPP with both approved and non-approved products. Embase and MEDLINE databases were searched (1980-September 2023). A search protocol was designed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42021215437). Details on publication, population, intervention, efficacy, safety and QoL were captured and checked by independent reviewers. In total, 118 publications were included, with only 19% of publications reporting on the results of clinical trials. Treatment modalities reported for GPP included non-biologic systemic therapies such as retinoids, cyclosporine and methotrexate, topical agents, biologics and small molecules, among others. Results were highly heterogeneous and methodological quality was very low, with only the interleukin-36R inhibitor spesolimab reporting results from placebo-controlled randomized trials; based on this, spesolimab is now approved for GPP treatment in regions including the USA, Japan, China, the EU and several other countries. Some other biologics are approved exclusively in Japan and Taiwan for the treatment of GPP based on open-label studies with small patient numbers in lieu of double-blind studies. Non-standardization of clinical outcomes across studies remains a major hurdle in reaching a consensus on optimal treatment. However, recently trials have been conducted using well-defined, disease-specific endpoints to evaluate GPP-targeted treatments, which will hopefully advance patient care. In conclusion, this review highlights the need for prospective randomized studies with GPP-specific endpoints to determine the optimal treatment strategy.

Management of Acute Severe Colitis in the Era of Biologicals and Small Molecules

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a medical emergency which occurs in about 20%–30% of patients with ulcerative colitis during their lifetime, and does carry a mortality risk of 1%. The management of inflammatory bowel diseases has evolved with changes in objective patient monitoring, as well as the availability of new treatment options with the development of new biological and small molecules; however, data is limited regarding their use in the context of ASUC. This review aims to discuss the emerging data regarding biologicals and small molecules therapies in the context of ASUC.

Ciclosporin Therapy After Infliximab Failure in Hospitalized Patients With Acute Severe Colitis is Effective and Safe

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Options for medical management of patients with acute severe colitis [ASC] failing intravenous (i.v.) steroids are limited and include rescue therapy with either infliximab or ciclosporin. In patients failing infliximab, second-line rescue therapy with ciclosporin is an alternative. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of ciclosporin in patients with steroid-refractory ASC failing first-line rescue therapy with infliximab.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, tertiary centre study undertaken from 2010 to 2017. Included were patients hospitalized for ASC and treated with i.v. ciclosporin after failing i.v. steroids and infliximab within the previous 2 months. Time to colectomy, clinical response, and occurrence of adverse events were analysed.

RESULTS

Forty patients with steroid-resistant ASC were included. Patients were followed for a median of 13 months (interquartile range [IQR] 5-32 months). Colectomy-free survival was 65%, 59.4%, and 41.8% at 1 month, 3 months and 1 year, respectively. Sixty percent of patients [24/40] achieved clinical remission at a median of 2 weeks [IQR 1-3 weeks]. Infliximab levels before ciclosporin infusion were available for 26 patients [median level 17.5 mg/mL, IQR 8-34 mg/mL] and were not associated with adverse events. Sixteen patients [40%] experienced adverse events after ciclosporin treatment, but none resulted in drug discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with i.v. steroid-refractory ASC who failed infliximab therapy, second-line rescue therapy with ciclosporin was shown to be effective and safe. This is the largest patient cohort to receive ciclosporin as second-line rescue therapy for ASC. We believe that ciclosporin may be offered to selected patients prior to referral for colectomy.

Joint AAD-NPF guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis with biologics

Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory multisystem disease that affects up to 3.2% of the US population. This guideline addresses important clinical questions that arise in psoriasis management and care, providing recommendations based on the available evidence. The treatment of psoriasis with biologic agents will be reviewed, emphasizing treatment recommendations and the role of the dermatologist in monitoring and educating patients regarding benefits as well as associated risks.

TNF stimulates IL-6, CXCL8 and VEGF secretion from human keratinocytes via activation of mTOR, inhibited by tetramethoxyluteolin

Psoriasis is an autoimmune skin disease characterized by keratinocyte hyperproliferation and chronic inflammation. The pathogenesis of psoriasis involves proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF), but the mechanism of keratinocyte activation is not well understood. Here, we show that TNF (10 or 50 ng/mL) stimulates a significant (P < .0001) gene expression and secretion of proinflammatory IL-6, CXCL8 and VEGF from both cultured human HaCaT and normal epidermal human keratinocytes (NHEKs). This effect occurs via activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signalling complex as shown by Western blot analysis and phospho-ELISAs. Pretreatment with the novel natural flavonoid tetramethoxyluteolin (10-100 μmol L^-1 ) significantly (P < .0001) inhibits gene expression and secretion (P < .0001) of all 3 mediators in a concentration-dependent manner. Moreover, tetramethoxyluteolin (50 μmol L^-1 ) appears to be a potent inhibitor of the phosphorylated mTOR substrates (pmTOR^Ser2448 , pp70S6K^Thr389 and p4EBP1^Thr37/46 ) as compared to known mTOR inhibitors in keratinocytes. The present findings indicate that TNF stimulates skin inflammation via mTOR signalling. Inhibition by tetramethoxyluteolin may be used in the treatment for psoriasis.

Tailored treatment options for patients with psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis: review of established and new biologic and small molecule therapies

The diverse clinical picture of PsA suggests the need to identify suitable therapies to address the different combinations of clinical manifestations. This review aimed to classify the available biologic agents and new small molecule inhibitors (licensed and nonlicensed) based on their proven efficacy in treating different clinical manifestations associated with psoriasis and PsA. This review presents the level of evidence of efficacy of different biologic treatments and small molecule inhibitors for certain clinical features of treatment of PsA and psoriasis, which was graded in categories I–IV. The literature searches were performed on the following classes of biologic agents and small molecules: TNF inhibitors (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, golimumab, certolizumab), anti-IL12/IL23 (ustekinumab), anti-IL17 (secukinumab, brodalumab, ixekizumab), anti-IL6 (tocilizumab), T cell modulators (alefacept, efalizumab, abatacept, itolizumab), B cell depletion therapy (rituximab), phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor (apremilast) and Janus kinase inhibitor (tofacitinib). A comprehensive table including 17 different biologic agents and small molecule inhibitors previously tested in psoriasis and PsA was generated, including the level of evidence of their efficacy for each of the clinical features included in our review (axial and peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, and nail and skin disease). We also proposed a limited set of recommendations for a sequential biologic treatment algorithm for patients with PsA who failed the first anti-TNF therapy, based on the available literature data. There is good evidence that many of the biologic treatments initially tested in psoriasis are also effective in PsA. Further research into both prognostic biomarkers and patient stratification is required to allow clinicians the possibility to make better use of the various biologic treatment options available. This review showed that there are many potentially new treatments that are not included in the current guidelines that can be used for selected categories of patients based on their disease phenotype, clinician experience and access to new biologic therapies.