1
|
Heneka N, Chambers SK, Schaefer I, Carmont K, Parcell M, Wallis S, Walker S, Tuffaha H, Steele M, Dunn J. Acceptability of a virtual prostate cancer survivorship care model in rural Australia: A multi-methods, single-centre feasibility pilot. Aust J Rural Health 2024. [PMID: 38853378 DOI: 10.1111/ajr.13149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Abstract
DESIGN A multi-methods, single-centre pilot comprising a quasi-experimental pre-/post-test design and an exploratory qualitative study. SETTING A rural Australian hospital and health service. PARTICIPANTS Men newly diagnosed with localised prostate cancer who were scheduled to undergo, or had undergone, radical or robotic prostatectomy surgery within the previous 3 months. INTERVENTION The intervention comprised a 12-week virtual care program delivered via teleconference by a specialist nurse, using a pre-existing connected care platform. The program was tailored to the post-operative recovery journey targeting post-operative care, psychoeducation, problem-solving and goal setting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome: program acceptability. SECONDARY OUTCOMES quality of life; prostate cancer-related distress; insomnia severity; fatigue severity; measured at baseline (T1); immediately post-intervention (T2); and 12 weeks post-intervention (T3). RESULTS Seventeen participants completed the program. The program intervention showed very high levels (≥4/5) of acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility. At T1, 47% (n = 8) of men reported clinically significant psychological distress, which had significantly decreased by T3 (p = 0.020). There was a significant improvement in urinary irritative/obstructive symptoms (p = 0.030) and a corresponding decrease in urinary function burden (p = 0.005) from T1 to T3. CONCLUSIONS This pilot has shown that a tailored nurse-led virtual care program, incorporating post-surgical follow-up and integrated low-intensity psychosocial care, is both acceptable to rural participants and feasible in terms of implementation and impact on patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Heneka
- University of Southern Queensland, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Suzanne K Chambers
- Australian Catholic University, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Isabelle Schaefer
- University of Southern Queensland, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Michael Steele
- Australian Catholic University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeff Dunn
- University of Southern Queensland, Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Signorelli C, Høeg BL, Asuzu C, Centeno I, Estapé T, Fisher P, Lam W, Levkovich I, Manne S, Miles A, Mullen L, Nekhlyudov L, Sade C, Shaw J, Singleton A, Travado L, Tsuchiya M, Lemmen J, Li J, Jefford M. International Survey of Psychosocial Care for Cancer Survivors in Low-/Middle- and High-Income Countries: Current Practices, Barriers, and Facilitators to Care. JCO Glob Oncol 2024; 10:e2300418. [PMID: 38781550 DOI: 10.1200/go.23.00418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The number of cancer survivors living with and beyond cancer treatment is rising globally. It is fundamental to understand the extent and type of psychosocial care services offered worldwide. We evaluated models of cancer survivorship care, psychosocial care practices in the post-treatment survivorship phase, and barriers/facilitators to delivery of psychosocial care services, including in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS The International Psycho-Oncology Society (IPOS) Survivorship Special Interest Group led a cross-sectional online survey between March and November 2022. Health care professionals and researchers in psycho-oncology were invited through the IPOS global membership, social media, and snowballing. The survey was administered to individuals but included questions related to practices in their country at a national level. RESULTS Two hundred eighty-three respondents from 37 countries participated (40% from LMICs), with a median of 12 years of experience (IQR, 6-20) in the psycho-oncology field. Participants reported that the most common elements of routine survivorship care were related to the prevention/management of recurrences/new cancers (74%), physical late effects (59%), and chronic medical conditions (53%), whereas surveillance/management of psychosocial late effects (27%) and psychosocial/supportive care (25%) were least common. Service availability was more commonly reported in high-income countries (HICs) than LMICs related to reproductive health (29% v 17%), genetic counseling/support (40% v 20%), and identifying/managing distress (39% v 26%) and pain (66% v 48%). Key barriers included providers focusing on treatment not survivorship (57%), medical not psychosocial care (60%), and a lack of allied health providers to deliver psychosocial care (59%). CONCLUSION The psychosocial needs of people living with cancer are not adequately available and/or provided in post-treatment survivorship even in HICs, because of barriers at patient, provider, and system levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Signorelli
- Discipline of Paediatrics & Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine & Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, Australia
| | | | - Chioma Asuzu
- Unit of Psycho-Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Isabel Centeno
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Tania Estapé
- Psychosocial Oncology Department, FEFOC Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Peter Fisher
- University of Liverpool; Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Wendy Lam
- School of Public Health, LSK Faculty of Medicine Jockey Club Institute of Cancer Care, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Inbar Levkovich
- Faculty of Graduate Studies, Oranim Academic College of Education, Kiryat Tiv'on, Israel
| | - Sharon Manne
- Department of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Anne Miles
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Mullen
- National Cancer Control Programme, Health Services Executive, Kings Inns House, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Larissa Nekhlyudov
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Cristina Sade
- Psychosocial Oncology Department, Instituto Nacional del Cáncer, Santiago, Chile
| | - Joanne Shaw
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Anna Singleton
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Engagement and Co-design Research Hub, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Luzia Travado
- Champalimaud Clinical and Research Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Miyako Tsuchiya
- Division of Healthcare Delivery, Survivorship and Policy Research, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
- Research Institute of Nursing, Musashino University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jesse Lemmen
- Pediatric Oncology, Emma's Children Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jie Li
- Center for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Michael Jefford
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nelson D, Selby P, Kane R, Harding-Bell A, Kenny A, McPeake K, Cooke S, Hogue T, Oliver K, Gussy M, Lawler M. Implementing the European code of cancer practice in rural settings. J Cancer Policy 2024; 39:100465. [PMID: 38184144 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024]
Abstract
Existing evidence often indicates higher cancer incidence and mortality rates, later diagnosis, lower screening uptake and poorer long-term survival for people living in rural compared to more urbanised areas. Despite wide inequities and variation in cancer care and outcomes across Europe, much of the scientific literature explicitly exploring the impact of rurality on cancer continues to come from Australia and North America. The European Code of Cancer Practice or "The Code" is a citizen and patient-centred statement of the most salient requirements for good clinical cancer practice and has been extensively co-produced by cancer patients, cancer professionals and patient advocates. It contains 10 key overarching Rights that a cancer patient should expect from their healthcare system, regardless of where they live and has been strongly endorsed by professional and patient cancer organisations as well as the European Commission. In this article, we use these 10 fundamental Rights as a framework to argue that (i) the issues and needs identified in The Code are generally more profound for rural people with cancer; (ii) addressing these issues is also more challenging in rural contexts; (iii) interventions and support must explicitly account for the unique needs of rural residents living with and affected by cancer and (iv) new innovative approaches are urgently required to successfully overcome the challenges faced by rural people with cancer and their caregivers. Despite equitable healthcare being a key European policy focus, the needs of rural people living with cancer have largely been neglected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Nelson
- Lincoln International Institute for Rural Health, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK; Macmillan Cancer Support, London, UK.
| | - Peter Selby
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Lincoln Medical School, Universities of Nottingham and Lincoln, Lincoln, UK
| | - Ros Kane
- School of Health and Social Care, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK
| | | | - Amanda Kenny
- Lincoln International Institute for Rural Health, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK; La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia
| | - Kathie McPeake
- Macmillan Cancer Support, London, UK; NHS Lincolnshire Integrated Care Board, Sleaford, UK
| | - Samuel Cooke
- School of Health and Social Care, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK
| | - Todd Hogue
- School of Psychology, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK
| | | | - Mark Gussy
- Lincoln International Institute for Rural Health, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK; La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia
| | - Mark Lawler
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bellas O, Kemp E, Edney L, Oster C, Roseleur J. The impacts of unmet supportive care needs of cancer survivors in Australia: A qualitative systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13726. [PMID: 36226338 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cancer incidence and survivorship are increasing worldwide. With more people living through and beyond cancer, there is a subsequent increase in their supportive care needs. This systematic review of qualitative studies aimed to describe the impacts of unmet supportive care needs on cancer survivors in Australia. METHODS Databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and Scopus were searched, and after screening and applying eligibility criteria, 27 qualitative studies were included. Findings were synthesised according to the Supportive Care Framework for Cancer Care, including informational, physical, practical, emotional, psychological, social and spiritual need domains. RESULTS The systematic review identified impacts of unmet informational, physical, practical, emotional and psychological needs. Frequently identified impacts of unmet informational needs were feelings of abandonment and isolation, distress, confusion and regret. Common impacts of unmet physical and practical needs were financial burden and return-to-work difficulties. Over half of all unmet supportive care needs caused emotional and psychological impacts. CONCLUSIONS Findings identify the detrimental emotional and psychological impacts resulting from a range of unmet supportive care needs. The review highlights the interconnections between supportive care need domains thereby enhancing the understanding of the impacts of unmet SCNs. Findings may inform policy and practice change to improve supportive cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Bellas
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Emma Kemp
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Laura Edney
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Candice Oster
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jackie Roseleur
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Recovery of Health and Wellbeing in Rural Cancer Survivors Following Primary Treatment: Analysis of UK Qualitative Interview Data. NURSING REPORTS 2022; 12:482-497. [PMID: 35894036 PMCID: PMC9326683 DOI: 10.3390/nursrep12030046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Rural cancer survivors have poorer experiences and health outcomes compared to their urban counterparts. There is limited research on the post-treatment experiences of UK cancer survivors residing in rural areas. This study aimed to provide an understanding of the specific challenges and opportunities faced by rural cancer survivors and to provide insight into how rurality influences experiences post-primary treatment, ultimately to inform service provision. Methods: A secondary analysis of in-depth interview transcripts (n = 16) from a wider study on self-management in cancer survivors was conducted. An adapted version of Foster and Fenlon’s recovery of health and wellbeing in cancer survivorship framework informed the data coding. Results: Health and wellbeing were interrupted by a variety of problem incidents, and the subsequent steps to recovery were influenced by pre-existing, personal, environmental, and healthcare factors. A prominent theme was support, both from local communities and family as well as from healthcare professionals, with many survivors feeling that their rural setting had a positive influence on their health and wellbeing. Close relationships with local GPs were seen as fundamental to supporting recovery. Access to healthcare was frequently mentioned as a challenge with an emphasis on lengthy travel times and limited bespoke support in rural areas. Conclusions: This study is novel in that it applied a well-established theoretical framework to a rich qualitative dataset on the lived experiences of rural cancer survivors. Rural residency influenced recovery from cancer both positively and negatively. Implications for Cancer Survivors: Future practitioners and policy makers should consider working with local communities to tailor interventions to the specific characteristics of the rural environment.
Collapse
|
6
|
Gunn KM, Weeks M, Spronk KJJ, Fletcher C, Wilson C. Caring for someone with cancer in rural Australia. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:4857-4865. [PMID: 35165761 PMCID: PMC9046138 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06857-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore the experiences of people caring for someone with cancer, while living in rural Australia, and the impact of the cancer-caring role on their well-being. METHOD Eighteen adults in regional or remote ('rural') Australia who cared for a person with cancer took part in semi-structured telephone interviews. Participants were aged 32-77 years and mainly female (66%). Data were analysed using thematic analysis and an essentialist approach. RESULTS Eight themes were identified: (1) travel is hard, but supports are available; (2) frustration with systems that do not demonstrate understanding of the rural context; (3) the importance of lay and peer support; (4) the impact of access to trusted, local health care services; (5) the importance of access to rurally relevant information (particularly on relevant services and what to expect); (6) living with uncertainty and balancing loss with hope; (7) reluctance to seek or accept psychological support; and (8) the gendered nature of care. CONCLUSION Rural cancer carers' roles can be made easier by improving health systems and coordination to ease the burden of travel, providing information about available support and what to expect throughout cancer treatment that is relevant to the rural context, and increasing access to quality health, community, and support services, including palliative care, in rural areas. More training on the specific needs of rural patients and their carers is needed for urban health care professionals. Peer support groups may have particular value for cancer carers in rural settings, where there are known to be multiple barriers to accessing professional sources of psychosocial support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate M. Gunn
- grid.1026.50000 0000 8994 5086Department of Rural Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia Australia ,grid.1014.40000 0004 0367 2697Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia Australia ,grid.492269.20000 0001 2233 2629Cancer Council SA, Adelaide, South Australia Australia ,grid.1010.00000 0004 1936 7304Freemasons Centre for Male Health and Wellbeing, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia Australia
| | - Melanie Weeks
- grid.1010.00000 0004 1936 7304School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia Australia
| | - Kristiaan J. J. Spronk
- grid.1026.50000 0000 8994 5086Department of Rural Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia Australia
| | - Chloe Fletcher
- grid.1026.50000 0000 8994 5086Department of Rural Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia Australia
| | - Carlene Wilson
- grid.1014.40000 0004 0367 2697Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia Australia ,grid.492269.20000 0001 2233 2629Cancer Council SA, Adelaide, South Australia Australia ,grid.1018.80000 0001 2342 0938La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Egilsdóttir H, Jónsdóttir H, Klinke ME. Living in Rural Areas and Receiving Cancer Treatment Away From Home: A Qualitative Study Foregrounding Temporality. Glob Qual Nurs Res 2022; 9:23333936221111802. [PMID: 35875361 PMCID: PMC9305796 DOI: 10.1177/23333936221111802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
We used explorative interviews to gauge (inter)personal, physiological, and emotional challenges of seven rural cancer patients who traveled long distances to cancer treatment centers. After a thematic analysis, we foregrounded experiences of temporality by using a phenomenologically inspired approach. The analysis resulted in three themes: (a) An epiphany of “what really matters in life”—time gains new meaning, (b) Feeling out of sync with others and own body—striving for coherence and simultaneity, and (c) Being torn between benefits of home and treatments site—time and distance as a tangible aspect of traveling and being away. Under these themes, 13 meaning units were generated, which reflected changes in temporality. During treatment, life primarily revolved around repeating circles of travel arrangements, staying on top of treatment schedule, and synchronizing a home life with a life away from home. Nurses should provide comprehensive care to enhance stability in cancer patients’ temporal experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Marianne Elisabeth Klinke
- University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.,Landspitali, The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wakefield CE, Sansom-Daly UM, McGill BC, Hetherington K, Ellis SJ, Robertson EG, Donoghoe MW, McCarthy M, Kelada L, Girgis A, King M, Grootenhuis M, Anazodo A, Patterson P, Lowe C, Dalla-Pozza L, Miles G, Cohn RJ. Providing Psychological Support to Parents of Childhood Cancer Survivors: ' Cascade' Intervention Trial Results and Lessons for the Future. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13225597. [PMID: 34830752 PMCID: PMC8615912 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary We assessed a new group-based cognitive behavior therapy videoconferencing program to support parents of childhood cancer survivors. The trial allocated parents to three groups: Cascade, peer-support, waitlist. Cascade achieved good parent engagement. We successfully delivered Cascade to participants who lived >3200 km apart. Any technical difficulties caused only minor disruptions. Most Cascade parents were satisfied and reported experiencing benefits from the program. However, Cascade did not improve our main outcomes, including parents’ quality of life, depression and anxiety. Cascade parents reported a short-term improvement in their confidence to use the skills they learnt, but this did not translate into actual use. After six months, Cascade parents felt their child survivor had lower psychological health than waitlisted parents. Our findings show that while some parents find Cascade helpful, it may not suit everyone. We used these findings to further improve Cascade and will trial the new version in future. Abstract We conducted a three-armed trial to assess Cascade, a four-module group videoconferencing cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) intervention for parents of childhood cancer survivors currently aged <18 years. We allocated parents to Cascade, an attention control (peer-support group), or a waitlist. The primary outcome was parents’ health-related quality of life (PedsQL-Family Impact/EQ-5D-5L) six months post-intervention. Parents also reported their anxiety/depression, parenting self-agency, fear of recurrence, health service and psychotropic medication use, engagement in productive activities, confidence to use, and actual use of, CBT skills, and their child’s quality of life. Seventy-six parents opted in; 56 commenced the trial. Cascade achieved good parent engagement and most Cascade parents were satisfied and reported benefits. Some parents expressed concerns about the time burden and the group format. Most outcomes did not differ across trial arms. Cascade parents felt more confident to use more CBT skills than peer-support and waitlisted parents, but this did not lead to more use of CBT. Cascade parents reported lower psychosocial health scores for their child than waitlisted parents. Cascade parents’ health service use, psychotropic medication use, and days engaged in productive activities did not improve, despite some improvements in waitlisted parents. Our trial was difficult to implement, but participants were largely satisfied. Cascade did not improve most outcomes, possibly because many parents were functioning well pre-enrolment. We used these findings to improve Cascade and will trial the new version in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire E. Wakefield
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; (U.M.S.-D.); (B.C.M.); (K.H.); (S.J.E.); (E.G.R.); (M.W.D.); (L.K.); (A.A.); (R.J.C.)
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-(2)-9382-3113; Fax: +61-(2)-9382-1789
| | - Ursula M. Sansom-Daly
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; (U.M.S.-D.); (B.C.M.); (K.H.); (S.J.E.); (E.G.R.); (M.W.D.); (L.K.); (A.A.); (R.J.C.)
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Brittany C. McGill
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; (U.M.S.-D.); (B.C.M.); (K.H.); (S.J.E.); (E.G.R.); (M.W.D.); (L.K.); (A.A.); (R.J.C.)
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Kate Hetherington
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; (U.M.S.-D.); (B.C.M.); (K.H.); (S.J.E.); (E.G.R.); (M.W.D.); (L.K.); (A.A.); (R.J.C.)
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Sarah J. Ellis
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; (U.M.S.-D.); (B.C.M.); (K.H.); (S.J.E.); (E.G.R.); (M.W.D.); (L.K.); (A.A.); (R.J.C.)
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia;
| | - Eden G. Robertson
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; (U.M.S.-D.); (B.C.M.); (K.H.); (S.J.E.); (E.G.R.); (M.W.D.); (L.K.); (A.A.); (R.J.C.)
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Mark W. Donoghoe
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; (U.M.S.-D.); (B.C.M.); (K.H.); (S.J.E.); (E.G.R.); (M.W.D.); (L.K.); (A.A.); (R.J.C.)
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
- Stats Central, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Maria McCarthy
- Clinical Sciences, Brain and Mind, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia;
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 2052, Australia
| | - Lauren Kelada
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; (U.M.S.-D.); (B.C.M.); (K.H.); (S.J.E.); (E.G.R.); (M.W.D.); (L.K.); (A.A.); (R.J.C.)
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Afaf Girgis
- South West Sydney Clinical Campuses, UNSW Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia;
| | - Madeleine King
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia;
| | - Martha Grootenhuis
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - Antoinette Anazodo
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; (U.M.S.-D.); (B.C.M.); (K.H.); (S.J.E.); (E.G.R.); (M.W.D.); (L.K.); (A.A.); (R.J.C.)
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| | - Pandora Patterson
- Research, Evaluation and Social Policy Unit, Canteen, Newtown, NSW 2042, Australia;
- Sydney Nursing School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Cherie Lowe
- Queensland Children’s Cancer Centre, Queensland Children’s Hospital, South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia;
| | - Luciano Dalla-Pozza
- Cancer Centre for Children, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia;
| | - Gordon Miles
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service, Perth Children’s Hospital, Perth, WA 6009, Australia;
| | - Richard J. Cohn
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, UNSW Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia; (U.M.S.-D.); (B.C.M.); (K.H.); (S.J.E.); (E.G.R.); (M.W.D.); (L.K.); (A.A.); (R.J.C.)
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kano M, Chen L, Boyce T, Gomez R, Gundelach AC, Jaffe SA, Sussman AL, Dayao ZR, Lobo J, Pestak CR, Rutledge TL. Characterizing Low-Risk Breast and Gynecological Cancer Patients for Transition into an Oncology/Primary Care Coordinated Care Model: Findings from a Survey of Diverse Survivors in a Rural U.S. State. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13174428. [PMID: 34503237 PMCID: PMC8431122 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
We conducted a survey to characterize the key attributes of racial/ethnic and geographically diverse low-risk breast and gynecologic cancer patients. We collected data regarding patients' access to primary care (PC); compliance with screening recommendations; treatment for comorbidities; logistical barriers to clinic visits; and receipt of survivorship care documentation (SCD). Survey findings informed the development of an oncology/Primary Care Provider (PCP) care coordination intervention to improve care. We distributed a cross-sectional survey among a convenience sample of 150 cancer survivors. Responses were calculated using descriptive statistics and compared based on the distance participants traveled to their appointments at the cancer center (≤30 vs. >30 miles). Of the 150 respondents, 35% traveled >30 miles for follow-up care and 78% reported having one or more comorbid condition(s). PC utilization was high: 88% reported having a PCP, and 91% indicated ≤1 yearly follow-up visit. Participants traveling >30 miles reported higher rates of logistical challenges associated with cancer center visits compared to those traveling ≤30 miles. Nearly half of respondents (46%) had not received SCD. In conclusion, survey studies such as these allow for the systematic assessment of survivor behaviors and care utilization patterns to inform the development of care coordination interventions for diverse, low-risk cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miria Kano
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA; (Z.R.D.); (C.R.P.)
- The University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA; (T.B.); (R.G.); (A.C.G.); (S.A.J.); (A.L.S.); (T.L.R.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-(505)-925-1115
| | - Lu Chen
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Population Health, The University of Texas Medical Branch; Albuquerque, NM 77555, USA;
| | - Tawny Boyce
- The University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA; (T.B.); (R.G.); (A.C.G.); (S.A.J.); (A.L.S.); (T.L.R.)
| | - Ricardo Gomez
- The University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA; (T.B.); (R.G.); (A.C.G.); (S.A.J.); (A.L.S.); (T.L.R.)
| | - Amy C. Gundelach
- The University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA; (T.B.); (R.G.); (A.C.G.); (S.A.J.); (A.L.S.); (T.L.R.)
| | - Shoshana Adler Jaffe
- The University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA; (T.B.); (R.G.); (A.C.G.); (S.A.J.); (A.L.S.); (T.L.R.)
| | - Andrew L. Sussman
- The University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA; (T.B.); (R.G.); (A.C.G.); (S.A.J.); (A.L.S.); (T.L.R.)
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA;
| | - Zoneddy R. Dayao
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA; (Z.R.D.); (C.R.P.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
| | - Jolene Lobo
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA;
| | - Claire R. Pestak
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA; (Z.R.D.); (C.R.P.)
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA;
| | - Teresa L. Rutledge
- The University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA; (T.B.); (R.G.); (A.C.G.); (S.A.J.); (A.L.S.); (T.L.R.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van der Kruk SR, Butow P, Mesters I, Boyle T, Olver I, White K, Sabesan S, Zielinski R, Chan BA, Spronk K, Grimison P, Underhill C, Kirsten L, Gunn KM. Psychosocial well-being and supportive care needs of cancer patients and survivors living in rural or regional areas: a systematic review from 2010 to 2021. Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:1021-1064. [PMID: 34392413 PMCID: PMC8364415 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06440-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Purpose To summarise what is currently known about the psychosocial morbidity, experiences, and needs of people with cancer and their informal caregivers, who live in rural or regional areas of developed countries. Methods Eligible studies dating from August 2010 until May 2021 were identified through several online databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and RURAL (Rural and Remote Health Database). Results were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines and the protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020171764). Results Sixty-five studies were included in this review, including 20 qualitative studies, 41 quantitative studies, and 4 mixed methods studies. Qualitative research demonstrated that many unique psychosocial needs of rural people remain unmet, particularly relating to finances, travel, and accessing care. However, most (9/19) quantitative studies that compared rural and urban groups reported no significant differences in psychosocial needs, morbidity, or quality of life (QOL). Five quantitative studies reported poorer psychosocial outcomes (social and emotional functioning) in urban cancer survivors, while three highlighted poorer outcomes (physical functioning, role functioning, and self-reported mental health outcomes) in the rural group. Conclusion Recent research shows that rural people affected by cancer have unique unmet psychosocial needs relating to rurality. However, there was little evidence that rural cancer survivors report greater unmet needs than their urban counterparts. This contrasts to the findings from a 2011 systematic review that found rural survivors consistently reported worse psychosocial outcomes. More population-based research is needed to establish whether uniquely rural unmet needs are due to general or cancer-specific factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannen R. van der Kruk
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA Australia
- Australian Centre for Precision Health, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Ilse Mesters
- Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Terry Boyle
- Australian Centre for Precision Health, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA Australia
| | - Ian Olver
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA Australia
| | - Kate White
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Sabe Sabesan
- College of Medicine and Dentistry (CMD), James Cook University, QLD, Townsville, Australia
| | - Rob Zielinski
- Central West Cancer Care Centre, Orange Base Hospital, Orange, NSW Australia
- Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Bryan A. Chan
- School of Medicine, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD Australia
| | - Kristiaan Spronk
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA Australia
- Department of Rural Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA Australia
| | - Peter Grimison
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | | | | | - Kate M. Gunn
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA Australia
- Department of Rural Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
PURPOSE Australian cancer survivors have multiple wellbeing support needs, and Australians frequently keep pets, a practice associated with physical and mental health benefits. This mixed-methods study explores the influence of relationships of PERMA (positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment) wellbeing domains and pet ownership on cancer survivors' physical and mental wellbeing and quality of life. METHODS A convenience sample of Australian cancer survivors (N = 162) were surveyed, recording demographic, pet ownership, PERMA wellbeing, physical and mental health characteristics, and support needs. Quality of life and health scores were predicted from PERMA domains and pet ownership. RESULTS Pet ownership was highly prevalent in participating cancer survivors, predicting increased mental health scores. No associations were seen for physical health. Cancer survivors sought instrumental pet care support and pet-owner relationship maintenance during survivorship.Implications: Pet ownership may be leverageable in interventions for mental health and wellbeing improvement during cancer recovery. Research should next clarify pet ownership prevalence in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Trigg
- Cancer Council South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.,CQUniversity, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gunn KM, Olver I, Skrabal Ross X, Harrison N, Livingston PM, Wilson C. Improving Survivors' Quality of Life Post-Treatment: The Perspectives of Rural Australian Cancer Survivors and Their Carers. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13071600. [PMID: 33808464 PMCID: PMC8037228 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Existing programs to support cancer survivors post-treatment tend to be delivered face-to-face, reducing their accessibility to those living in rural and remote locations. Additionally, little is known about the acceptability of urban-developed survivorship care programs among rural cancer survivors who may have unique values and different attitudes towards help-seeking. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of cancer survivors who return to their rural communities upon completion of active treatment, and to identify the challenges these survivors experience in engaging with quality of life-related support services. The findings of this study will inform the design and development of new interventions, or modification of existing interventions, to better meet the preferences and needs of rural survivors. Identifying the specific challenges and intervention preferences of rural cancer survivors will help to ensure they benefit as much as urban survivors, from efforts to improve post-treatment quality of life. Abstract The transition from urban centres back to rural and remote communities can be challenging for rural cancer survivors after treatment. This study aimed to (a) provide deeper understanding of the experiences of rural survivors who have completed active cancer treatment and returned to their rural communities, and (b) determine strategies to re-orient existing services or develop new interventions to more appropriately meet rural survivors’ service preferences and needs. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 adults (64% female) who lived outside of a metropolitan area and had completed active cancer treatment (n = 13), were the carer for a rural/remote cancer survivor (n = 6), or were both a survivor and carer (n = 3). Thematic analysis was conducted to identify dominant themes in the qualitative data. A range of physical, psychological and practical challenges that impact quality of life among rural survivors post-treatment were found. These challenges appeared to be compounded by a lack of trust in local rural healthcare services and a lack of clear post-treatment pathways to quality of life-enhancing support services. Acceptable strategies to overcome barriers included nurse-led, telephone-based, or face-to-face interventions, initiated and continued by the same service provider, and that included support to manage emotional challenges associated with post-treatment survivorship. The findings will inform the design of interventions to better meet rural cancer survivors’ post-treatment support needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate M. Gunn
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, Australia; (X.S.R.); (N.H.)
- Department of Rural Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, Australia
- Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide 5042, Australia;
- Cancer Council SA, Adelaide 5067, Australia
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-8-8302-2137
| | - Ian Olver
- School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5001, Australia;
| | - Xiomara Skrabal Ross
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, Australia; (X.S.R.); (N.H.)
- Department of Rural Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, Australia
| | - Nathan Harrison
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, Australia; (X.S.R.); (N.H.)
- Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide 5042, Australia;
| | | | - Carlene Wilson
- Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide 5042, Australia;
- Cancer Council SA, Adelaide 5067, Australia
- LaTrobe University, Melbourne 3086, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nelson D, McGonagle I, Jackson C, Kane R. What is known about the role of rural-urban residency in relation to self-management in people affected by cancer who have completed primary treatment? A scoping review. Support Care Cancer 2020; 29:67-78. [PMID: 32747989 PMCID: PMC7398290 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05645-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Despite wide acknowledgement of differences in levels of support and health outcomes between urban and rural areas, there is a lack of research that explicitly examines these differences in relation to self-management in people affected by cancer following treatment. This scoping review aimed to map the existing literature that examines self-management in people affected by cancer who were post-treatment from rural and urban areas. Methods Arksey and O’Malley’s framework for conducting a scoping review was utilised. Keyword searches were performed in the following: Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science. Supplementary searching activities were also conducted. Results A total of 438 articles were initially retrieved and 249 duplicates removed leaving 192 articles that were screened by title, abstract and full text. Nine met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. They were published from 2011 to 2018 and conducted in the USA (n = 6), Australia (n = 2) and Canada (n = 1). None of the studies offered insight into self-managing cancer within a rural-urban context in the UK. Studies used qualitative (n = 4), mixed methods (n = 4) and quantitative designs (n = 1). Conclusion If rural and urban populations define their health in different ways as some of the extant literature suggests, then efforts to support self-management in both populations will need to be better informed by robust evidence given the increasing focus on patient-centred care. It is important to consider if residency can be a predictor of as well as a barrier or facilitator to self-management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Nelson
- School of Health and Social Care, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln, LN6 7TS UK
| | - Ian McGonagle
- School of Health and Social Care, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln, LN6 7TS UK
| | - Christine Jackson
- School of Health and Social Care, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln, LN6 7TS UK
| | - Ros Kane
- School of Health and Social Care, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln, LN6 7TS UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Raphael D, Frey R, Gott M. Psychological support requirements of haematological cancer survivors: how can health professionals meet their needs? PSYCHOL HEALTH MED 2020; 26:832-844. [PMID: 32522026 DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2020.1778752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Complex and intensive treatment may lead to psychosocial issues for haematological cancer survivors, which may endure after treatment. Psychological support is important for cancer survivors but not always available. This study aimed to determine the health professional psychological support needs of post-treatment haematological cancer survivors, through the use of across-sectional survey. Chi-Square analyses were used to calculate the differences in need for psychological support. Open text responses were analysed using quantitative content analysis. Four hundred and nine questionnaires were completed. Around quarter (24.6%) of participants reported needing more psychological support from a health professional, especially those who were aged 18-39, females, 'Other' ethnicity, single, living with other family/roommates, unemployed/on sick leave, suffering significant distress, and those with low/moderate social support. The majority of those desiring more support preferred it from a psychologist/counsellor (58.3%), or a haematologist (39.3%). Haematologists are a regular point of contact for these survivors and not only have the opportunity to discuss psychological issues with patients but to determine who needs referring to further psychological treatment. Furthermore, the a number of participant's reporting theneed for extra psychological support from a psychologist/counsellor means it is imperative that these services are available and known to those requiring them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Raphael
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Rosemary Frey
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Merryn Gott
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Missel M, Hansen M, Jackson R, Siemsen M, Schønau MN. Re-embodying eating after surgery for oesophageal cancer: Patients' lived experiences of participating in an education and counselling nutritional intervention. J Clin Nurs 2018; 27:1420-1430. [PMID: 29399901 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To provide in-depth insight into patients' lived experiences of participating in an education and counselling nutritional intervention after curative surgery for oesophageal cancer. BACKGROUND Surgery for oesophageal cancer carries a risk of malnutrition. The consequences of nutritional problems may lead to increased morbidity and mortality postoperatively and have consequences for convalescence, rehabilitation and quality of life. DESIGN Qualitative study based on a phenomenological approach. The theoretical framework was grounded in the philosophy of Merleau-Ponty. METHODS Qualitative interviews were conducted with 10 patients who participated in an education and counselling nutritional intervention after surgery for oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. Data were analysed according to the principles of Kvale and Brinkmann, and their three levels of interpretation were applied. FINDINGS The essence of experiencing the education and counselling nutritional intervention can be divided into three themes: embodied disorientation, living with increased attention to bodily functions and re-embodying eating. CONCLUSIONS Patients were living with increased attention to bodily functions and tried to find a balance between the task of eating and nutritional needs. Despite the embodied perceptions of alterations after oesophageal cancer surgery, the patients developed high levels of bodily awareness and skills in self-management. This process was characterised by reconnecting to the body and re-embodying eating. The intervention empowered the patients to regain some control of their own bodies in an effort to regain agency in their own lives. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE There is a need for systematic long-term follow-up after surgery for oesophageal cancer regarding nutrition. The findings of this study can inform future supportive nutrition care service development aimed at supporting patients to learn to eat sufficiently after oesophageal resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malene Missel
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Rie Jackson
- Department of Anaesthesiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mette Siemsen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mai Nanna Schønau
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Haigh MM, Baxi S, Lyford M, Cheetham S, Thompson SC. Cancer support services: Are they meeting the needs of rural radiotherapy patients? Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2018; 28:e12904. [PMID: 30084525 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2017] [Revised: 06/17/2018] [Accepted: 07/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
This paper examines the supportive care in place to meet the needs of patients receiving radiotherapy at a regional oncology service in Bunbury, Western Australia. Semi-structured in-depth interviews with 21 service providers and 17 adults diagnosed with cancer who underwent radiotherapy at the Service were recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically. Key themes relevant were co-operation and collaboration of interdisciplinary team members; support from organisations to assist with accommodation, transport, emotional support and provision of practical assistance, as well as barriers to accessing support. Most participants were positive about the support available, recognising the needs of rural radiotherapy patients for assistance with travel, accommodation and psychosocial support to help deal with the stressors they face. Collaboration between the various service providers maximised the support available to patients but the drop off in psychosocial support once the intensity of treatment was completed was identified as a weakness in the support available. The support system, established around a regional radiotherapy service, was enhanced by the collaborative professional relationships developed among service providers. The service extends beyond clinical service delivery by recognising financial, logistical and psychosocial support needs, factors to be considered to ensure rural radiotherapy patients are provided with holistic care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret M Haigh
- Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Dublin Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Siddhartha Baxi
- Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Radiation Oncology, South West Radiation Oncology Service, South West Health Campus, Corner of Bussell Hwy & Robertson Drive, Bunbury, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Marilyn Lyford
- Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Shelley Cheetham
- Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sandra C Thompson
- Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lashbrook M, Bernardes CM, Kirshbaum MN, Valery PC. Physical functioning and psychological morbidity among regional and rural cancer survivors: A report from a regional cancer centre. Aust J Rural Health 2018; 26:211-219. [PMID: 29799149 DOI: 10.1111/ajr.12419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify factors associated with psychosocial, physical and practical difficulties of daily living and distress among cancer survivors from a regional area in Australia. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING Riverina region of southern New South Wales. PARTICIPANTS The sample included 134 patients who completed treatment for breast, colorectal, lung or cancer at the Riverina Cancer Care Centre. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Distress was assessed by the Distress Thermometer. Psychosocial, physical and practical difficulties of daily living were assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System questionnaires. RESULTS A high proportion of cancer survivors had abnormal scores for physical function, sleep disturbance, satisfaction with role, fatigue and pain interference, with many also displaying abnormal scores for anxiety, depression and distress. Survivors living in rural areas and those who had undergone surgery had higher odds of having abnormal scores for sleep disturbance than their counterparts. Living without a partner increased the odds of anxiety and depression. Having advanced disease increased the odds of anxiety and pain. Colorectal cancer and higher education were associated with depression. CONCLUSION Monitoring for abnormal physical and psychosocial issues after cancer treatment is essential to maintain or improve psychosocial well-being during survivorship. When developing survivorship care plans for patients residing in regional centres, health professionals should consider availability of high-quality and accessible support services in regional areas of Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari Lashbrook
- The Riverina Cancer Care Centre, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia.,QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Christina M Bernardes
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Marilynne N Kirshbaum
- School of Health (Nursing), Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Patricia C Valery
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.,Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lyford M, Haigh MM, Baxi S, Cheetham S, Shahid S, Thompson SC. An Exploration of Underrepresentation of Aboriginal Cancer Patients Attending a Regional Radiotherapy Service in Western Australia. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2018; 15:E337. [PMID: 29443892 PMCID: PMC5858406 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15020337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Revised: 01/30/2018] [Accepted: 02/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Travel logistics impede Aboriginal patients' uptake of cancer treatments and is one reason for the poorer outcomes of Aboriginal people with cancer. This research examined benefits of a newly established rurally based radiotherapy unit in southwest Western Australia (WA), and included exploring the experience of Aboriginal patients and possible reasons for Aboriginal people's underrepresentation in treatment. Semi-structured in-depth interviews with 21 service providers involved in the treatment and care of people with cancer, and 3 Aboriginal patients with cancer who undertook radiotherapy at the Service were undertaken. Data were subject to thematic analysis involving immersion in the data for familiarization, inductive coding, investigator discussion and refining of emerging themes and triangulation of patient and provider interviews. Aboriginal cancer patients were positive about the treatment and support they had received, highlighting the often complex challenges faced by rural Aboriginal cancer patients in accessing and maintaining treatment. Service providers offered suggestions for small numbers presenting to the Service, including late presentation, potential perceptions of cultural insensitivity on the part of service providers, out-of-pocket costs and under-ascertainment of Aboriginal status. The Service has put in place practices and initiatives to support patient health and wellbeing, including making the facility more welcoming towards Aboriginal people and ensuring culturally appropriate care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilyn Lyford
- Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, 167 Fitzgerald Street, Geraldton, Western Australia 6530, Australia.
| | - Margaret M Haigh
- Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, 167 Fitzgerald Street, Geraldton, Western Australia 6530, Australia.
| | - Siddhartha Baxi
- Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, 167 Fitzgerald Street, Geraldton, Western Australia 6530, Australia.
- Radiation Oncology, South West Radiation Oncology Service, South West Health Campus, Corner of Bussell Hwy & Robertson Drive, Bunbury, Western Australia 6230, Australia.
| | - Shelley Cheetham
- Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, 167 Fitzgerald Street, Geraldton, Western Australia 6530, Australia.
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Curtin University, Kent Street, Perth, Western Australia 6102, Australia.
| | - Shaouli Shahid
- Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, 167 Fitzgerald Street, Geraldton, Western Australia 6530, Australia.
- Centre for Aboriginal Studies, Curtin University, Kent Street, Perth, Western Australia 6102, Australia.
| | - Sandra C Thompson
- Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, 167 Fitzgerald Street, Geraldton, Western Australia 6530, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Carolan C, Smith A, Davies G, Forbat L. Seeking, accepting and declining help for emotional distress in cancer: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2017; 27:e12720. [DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C.M. Carolan
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport; University of Stirling (Western Isles Campus); Stornoway UK
- NHS Western Isles; Stornoway UK
| | - A. Smith
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport; University of Stirling (Western Isles Campus); Stornoway UK
| | - G.R. Davies
- PGT Tertiary & Higher Education; Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business; Lews Castle College UHI; Stornoway UK
| | - L. Forbat
- Palliative Care; Australian Catholic University and Calvary Health Care; Australian Catholic University; Canberra ACT Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fennell K, Turnbull D, Bidargaddi N, McWha J, Davies M, Olver I. The consumer-driven development and acceptability testing of a website designed to connect rural cancer patients and their families, carers and health professionals with appropriate information and psychosocial support. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2016; 26. [DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- K.M. Fennell
- Cancer Council SA; Unley BC SA Australia
- Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer; School of Medicine; Flinders University; Adelaide SA Australia
- School of Psychology; The University of Adelaide; Adelaide SA Australia
- Sansom Institute for Health Research; University of South Australia; Adelaide SA Australia
| | - D.A. Turnbull
- School of Psychology; The University of Adelaide; Adelaide SA Australia
| | - N. Bidargaddi
- Mental Health Observatory Research Unit; Country Health SA; Adelaide SA Australia
- eHealth Systems Research; School of Medicine; Flinders University; Bedford Park SA Australia
| | - J.L. McWha
- School of Psychology; The University of Adelaide; Adelaide SA Australia
| | - M. Davies
- Davies & Robertson Psychology Practice; Golden Grove SA Australia
| | - I. Olver
- Sansom Institute for Health Research; University of South Australia; Adelaide SA Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pati S, Hussain MA, Swain S, Salisbury C, Metsemakers JFM, Knottnerus JA, van den Akker M. Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Multimorbidity in Primary Care: An Indian Experience. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2016; 2016:6582487. [PMID: 26966687 PMCID: PMC4761379 DOI: 10.1155/2016/6582487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2015] [Accepted: 01/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Multimorbidity remains an underexplored domain in Indian primary care. We undertook a study to assess the prevalence, correlates, and outcomes of multimorbidity in primary care settings in India. This paper describes the process of development and validation of our data collection tool "Multimorbidity Assessment Questionnaire for Primary Care (MAQ-PC)." An iterative process comprising desk review, chart review, and expert consultations was undertaken to generate the questionnaire. The MAQ-PC contained items on chronic conditions, health care utilization, health related quality of life, disease severity, and sociodemographics. It was first tested with twelve adults for comprehensibility followed by test-retest reliability with 103 patients from four primary care practices. For interrater reliability, two interviewers separately administered the questionnaire to sixteen patients. MAQ-PC displayed strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.69), interrater reliability (Cohen's Kappa: 0.78-1), and test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.970-0.741). Substantial concordance between self-report and physician diagnosis (Scott Kappa: 0.59-1.0) was observed for listed chronic conditions indicating strong concurrent validity. Nearly 54% had one chronic condition and 23.3% had multimorbidity. Our findings demonstrate MAQ-PC to be a valid and reliable measure of multimorbidity in primary care practice and suggest its potential utility in multimorbidity research in India.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanghamitra Pati
- Indian Institute of Public Health, Bhubaneswar, Public Health Foundation of India, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751024, India
| | - Mohammad Akhtar Hussain
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Subhashisa Swain
- Indian Institute of Public Health, Bhubaneswar, Public Health Foundation of India, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751024, India
| | - Chris Salisbury
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Job F. M. Metsemakers
- Department of Family Medicine, School Caphri, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - J. André Knottnerus
- Department of Family Medicine, School Caphri, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Marjan van den Akker
- Department of Family Medicine, School Caphri, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of General Practice, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|