1
|
Almusafer M, Narayan Y, Nnorom I, Karna S, Katsouri A, Russo GI, Morgado A, Symeonidis EN, Buchholz N, Papatsoris A, Tsampoukas G. Exploring pharmacological interventions in benign prostate hyperplasia: the role of cost-effectiveness analysis in daily practice and future directions. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2024; 25:907-914. [PMID: 38828638 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2024.2362272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH) significantly impacts men's health and quality of life, with its prevalence rising with age. This review critically examines the cost-effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for BPH to optimize patient outcomes and healthcare resource utilization. AREAS COVERED This review explores the integration of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) into clinical practice, balancing clinical efficacy with economic efficiency in BPH management. We performed a critical literature search, including recent studies on the economic evaluation of BPH treatments, focusing on pharmacotherapies such as alpha-blockers and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors. Additionally, we discussed the concept of CEA and evaluated the role of medicinal reconciliation and the avoidance of polypharmacy in favor of optimal BPH treatment. EXPERT OPINION Cost-effectiveness analysis is crucial for evaluating BPH treatments, with evidence suggesting a shift towards surgical interventions may offer greater long-term economic benefits. However, these models must be applied cautiously, considering clinical evidence and patient preferences to ensure equitable and patient-centric healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Murtadha Almusafer
- Scientific Office, U-merge Ltd, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University of Basrah, Basrah, Iraq
| | | | - Ijeoma Nnorom
- Department of Urology, Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Homerton, UK
| | - Sourabh Karna
- Department of Urology, Milton Keynes University Hospital, Milton Keynes, UK
| | | | | | - Afonso Morgado
- Serviço de Urologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Evangelos N Symeonidis
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Athanasios Papatsoris
- Scientific Office, U-merge Ltd, London, UK
- 2nd Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios Tsampoukas
- Scientific Office, U-merge Ltd, London, UK
- Department of Urology, Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Homerton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kittang J, Ohlsson-Nevo E, Schröder A. Quality of care in the oncological outpatient setting: Individual interviews with people receiving cancer treatment. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2023; 64:102335. [PMID: 37290164 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2023.102335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe how patients receiving cancer treatment perceive quality of care in the oncological outpatient settings. METHOD A strategic sample of 20 adult patients with cancer treated in four oncological outpatient settings in four hospitals in Sweden participated in the study. Participants were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide with open-ended questions. The interviews were audio-recorded, and the transcripts were analysed using a phenomenographic approach. RESULTS Three descriptive categories emerged from the data: The patient's care is designed to meet individual needs, The patient's dignity is respected, and The patient feels safe and secure with the care. Overall, quality of care in the oncological outpatient setting is perceived as something positive and described in normative terms by the participants. CONCLUSION The results emphasises that in order to achieve quality of care it is important to the patients that they are able to meet with the same well-educated, professional, caring and sensible health care professionals every time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanette Kittang
- University Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Box 1613, SE-701 16, Örebro, Sweden; Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, SE-701 82, Örebro, Sweden.
| | - Emma Ohlsson-Nevo
- University Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Box 1613, SE-701 16, Örebro, Sweden; Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, SE-701 82, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Agneta Schröder
- University Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Box 1613, SE-701 16, Örebro, Sweden; Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gjøvik, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aristokleous I, Öberg J, Pantiora E, Sjökvist O, Navia JE, Mani M, Karakatsanis A. Effect of standardised surgical assessment and shared decision-making on morbidity and patient satisfaction after breast conserving therapy: A cross-sectional study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:60-67. [PMID: 36088236 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of oncoplastic breast conserving therapy (OPBCT) on physical function, morbidity and patient satisfaction has yet to be defined. Additionally, technique selection should be individualised and incorporate patient preference. The study aim was to investigate differences between "standard" (sBCT) and oncoplastic breast conservation (OPBCT) in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) when patients have been assessed in a standardised manner and technique selection has been reached through shared decision-making (SDM). METHODS This is a cross-sectional study of 215 women treated at a tertiary referral centre. Standardised surgical assessment included breast and lesion volumetry, definition of resection ratio, patient-related risk factors and patient preference. Postoperative morbidity and patient satisfaction were assessed by validated PROs tools (Diseases of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand-DASH and Breast-Q). Patient experience was assessed by semi-structured interviews. RESULTS There was no difference of the median values between OPBCT and sBCT in postoperative morbidity of the upper extremity (DASH 3.3 vs 5, p = 0.656) or the function of the chest wall (Breast-Q 82 vs 82, p = 0.758). Postoperative satisfaction with breasts did not differ either (Breast-Q 65 vs 61, p = 0.702). On the individual level, women that opted for OPBCT after SDM had improved satisfaction when compared to baseline (+3 vs -1, p = 0.001). Shared decision-making changed patient attitude in 69.8% of patients, leading most often to de-escalation from mastectomy. CONCLUSIONS These findings support that a combination of standardised surgical assessment and SDM allows for tailored treatment and de-escalation of oncoplastic surgery without negatively affecting patient satisfaction and morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iliana Aristokleous
- Department of Surgery, Endocrine- and Breast Unit, Uppsala University Hospital, 75237, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Uppsala University, 75236, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Johanna Öberg
- Department of Surgery, Endocrine- and Breast Unit, Uppsala University Hospital, 75237, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Uppsala University, 75236, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Eirini Pantiora
- Department of Surgery, Endocrine- and Breast Unit, Uppsala University Hospital, 75237, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Uppsala University, 75236, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Olivia Sjökvist
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Uppsala University, 75236, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, 75237, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Jaime E Navia
- Department of Surgery, Endocrine- and Breast Unit, Uppsala University Hospital, 75237, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Uppsala University, 75236, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Maria Mani
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Uppsala University, 75236, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, 75237, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Andreas Karakatsanis
- Department of Surgery, Endocrine- and Breast Unit, Uppsala University Hospital, 75237, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Uppsala University, 75236, Uppsala, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Launonen M, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Mattila L, Savela RM, Kvist T. Older patients' perceptions of the quality of acute cancer care: An integrative review-A mixed-method approach. Int J Older People Nurs 2023; 18:e12503. [PMID: 36168107 DOI: 10.1111/opn.12503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
AIM This integrative review aimed to describe the perceptions of the quality of care of older patients (aged 65 and above) living with cancer in acute-care settings. METHODS We identified relevant research suitable for inclusion criteria through systematic searches of the PubMed®, EBSCOhost Academic Search Premier®, Scopus® and Web of Science® databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework and the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guidelines were used to conduct the research and report the results. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the modified Critical Skills Appraisal Programme (CASP) checklist. RESULTS A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria. The data analysis revealed that care quality could be described through three distinct themes: individuality, a sense of security and respectful encounters. CONCLUSION The perceptions of older people living with cancer regarding the quality of acute care have not been extensively covered in the literature. Health- and age-related challenges, patients' overall life situation, clear, realistic information about care and the future and respect during encounters should be given attention. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Patient-centred and tailored care, considering the heterogeneity of the population and support for independence, is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minna Launonen
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Katri Vehviläinen-Julkunen
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Laura Mattila
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Roosa-Maria Savela
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Tarja Kvist
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tolotti A, Barello S, Vignaduzzo C, Liptrott SJ, Valcarenghi D, Nania T, Sari D, Bonetti L. Patient Engagement in Oncology Practice: A Qualitative Study on Patients' and Nurses' Perspectives. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:11644. [PMID: 36141919 PMCID: PMC9517681 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Patient engagement has gained increasing attention in cancer care as it is widely acknowledged as an essential element of high-quality care. There are limited data on how oncology nurses might apply techniques that encourage patient engagement. Therefore, this study aims to understand which nursing strategies can favour patient engagement in oncological care from patients' and nurses' perspectives. We conducted a qualitative study involving oncology patients and oncology nurses. Patients were interviewed, while nurses were involved in focus groups (FGs). Both interviews and FGs were analysed by the means of thematic analysis. We interviewed six patients and conducted two FGs, involving 17 nurses. Five themes were identified from patients' interviews: effective information, having the opportunity to choose, being considered a person, trusted relationship with nurses, and receiving support and advice. Additionally, five themes were identified from the FGs: the nurse-patient relationship, personalisation of care, information style, engagement strategies, and the team. The participants highlighted the importance of comprehensive information in order for patients to feel more involved. Great importance was given to the nurse-patient relationship, which must be based on trust and mutual respect. Both nurses and patients emphasised the importance of person-centred care. A more systematic implementation of suggestions from the participants in this study is desirable for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Tolotti
- Nursing Development and Research Unit, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Gallino, 12, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Serena Barello
- EngageMinds HUB—Consumer, Food & Health Engagement Research Center, Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano and Cremona, L.Go Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, Italy
| | - Camilla Vignaduzzo
- EngageMinds HUB—Consumer, Food & Health Engagement Research Center, Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano and Cremona, L.Go Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, Italy
| | - Sarah Jayne Liptrott
- Nursing Development and Research Unit, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Gallino, 12, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Nursing Development and Research Unit, Regional Hospital of Bellinzona and Valli, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Ospedale 12, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Dario Valcarenghi
- Nursing Development and Research Unit, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Gallino, 12, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Tiziana Nania
- Health Professions Research and Development Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Piazza Edmondo Malan, 2, San Donato Milanese, 20097 Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Sari
- Department of Nursing, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Via Gallino, 12, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Loris Bonetti
- Nursing Research Competence Centre, Department of Nursing, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Viale Officina, 3, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland or
- Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Via Violino, 11, 6928 Manno, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hobden B, Mansfield E, Freund M, Clapham M, Sanson-Fisher R. Experiences of Patient-Centered Care Among Older Community-Dwelling Australians. Front Public Health 2022; 10:912137. [PMID: 35774564 PMCID: PMC9237321 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.912137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Older adults represent the largest consumers of health care. It is, therefore, important that they receive adequate patient-centered care to empower them to be proactive in managing their health. Aims This study examined the proportion of older community-dwelling individuals who report receiving patient-centered care during healthcare consultations. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted with 117 clients of an Australian aged care provider. Clients completed a survey examining their perceptions of whether they received patient-centered care (11-items) from healthcare professionals. Results The mean number of patient-centered care items reported was 8.7 (±3.1). Speaking to the patient with respect was the item most often reported to be patient-centered (94%). Asking patients about treatment goals or expectations (62%) and how involved they would like to be in treatment (67%) were the items least reported to be patient-centered. Conclusion Older adults perceived some important aspects of care were not provided with a patient-centered approach. There is a need to improve healthcare providers' elicitation of older patients' care preferences, enabling patients to determine their level of involvement in their health management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Breanne Hobden
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
- *Correspondence: Breanne Hobden
| | - Elise Mansfield
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Megan Freund
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Matthew Clapham
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Rob Sanson-Fisher
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ector GI, Verweij L, Hermens RP, Blijlevens NM. Filling the gaps of patient information needs and information perception in chronic myeloid leukemia with the patient-physician co-produced web-based platform CMyLife. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:686-694. [PMID: 34226069 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with chronic myeloid leukemia, a web-based platform CMyLife was developed. Its aim is to enhance patient empowerment, by adequate information provision, among others. Before evaluating its effect, information provision and needs in current care were assessed. OBJECTIVE To assess patients' evaluation of received information and information needs before CMyLife utilization and whether this information source is used correspondingly. Additionally, we explored predicting patient factors in information perception. PATIENT INVOLVEMENT CMyLife platform was developed with active patient participation. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey among 203 CML patients before launch of the CMyLife platform, using validated questionnaires on information provision and predictive factors. We focused on website utilization during the first 3 years, using Google Analytics. Regression analyses were performed to determine influence of patient factors on information perception. RESULTS Global perceived information provision was scored 42.8 (0-100). Information on other services such as rehabilitation and psychological support, and effects of treatment on sexuality showed room for improvement. One out of 3 knew where to find useful health information online. But more information was desired by 36% of them. Age ≥65 years, time since diagnosis and low education were positively associated with this need. Pages on medication and side effects were visited the most. DISCUSSION To fill the gap in perceived provision and needs, information should be adjusted more to the individual in content, manner and timing. Age, time since diagnosis, and educational level are of influence in perceived information, and specific needs within these groups should be further explored. PRACTICAL VALUE CMyLife provides reliable and up-to-date information for low eHealth literacy skilled patients concerning multiple topics indicated by patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geneviève Icg Ector
- Department of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Lynn Verweij
- Department of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rosella Pmg Hermens
- Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole Ma Blijlevens
- Department of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Apadula L, Capurso G, Ambrosi A, Arcidiacono PG. Patient Reported Experience Measure in Endoscopic Ultrasonography: The PREUS Study Protocol. NURSING REPORTS 2022; 12:59-64. [PMID: 35225893 PMCID: PMC8883908 DOI: 10.3390/nursrep12010007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The evaluation of the patient’s experience is becoming increasingly important as a better patient experience can improve the quality of the health service delivered. Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are self-report assessment tools provided to patients about their experience during any health event. There are few PREM instruments in the field of gastrointestinal endoscopy, and none is specific for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). This study aims to develop a questionnaire to evaluate the experience of patients undergoing EUS, identifying and prioritizing the factors related to the patient’s experience. The study will consist of several phases: (A) tool creation; (B) face and content validity; (C) ranking: to evaluate the relevance of the identified questions in the previous phase; (D) questionnaire creation and validity testing. The final output will be the production of a specific tool that can be used to measure patients’ experience during EUS. This questionnaire may become a relevant part of actions taken to measure the quality of care provided to patients undergoing EUS. Furthermore, correlation between health care providers’ and patients’ views of the relevance of the included items will allow optimization of empathetic and psychological aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Apadula
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division IRCCS San Raffaele, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (L.A.); (P.G.A.)
| | - Gabriele Capurso
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division IRCCS San Raffaele, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (L.A.); (P.G.A.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Alessandro Ambrosi
- Surgery and Medicine Department, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division IRCCS San Raffaele, Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (L.A.); (P.G.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Laberge M, Rekik M, Djiffa KM. Parents' preferences for follow-up care in a type 1 diabetes paediatric population: a survey-based study in Quebec, Canada. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e046757. [PMID: 34824105 PMCID: PMC8627392 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Examine variations in parent's preferences for their child's type 1 diabetes (T1D) follow-up care and the determinants of the preferred intensity of care. Clinical guidelines recommend multidisciplinary management of T1D, with follow-up visits with an endocrinologist at least every 3 months in the paediatric population. However, there could be heterogeneity in parents' needs, and preferences in terms of care management may deviate from clinical guidelines. SETTING Not applicable. PARTICIPANTS Parents who have a child living with T1D and who reside in Quebec, Canada. INTERVENTION In collaboration with a patient-partner (a parent of a child with T1D), we developed a survey to collect data from parents of children living with T1D. Our primary outcome of interest was the preferred time in months between two appointments. We ran a probit model to analyse longer time (over 3 months between appointments), compared with the standard of care (3 months or less). RESULTS Results suggest that about one-third (33%) of parents want to deviate from the guideline. Parents who want to increase the time between appointments are more experienced in the management of the disease and have higher costs than those who wish to follow the 3-month guideline. The number of years since the diagnosis is positively associated with a preference for a longer time between appointments, while the perceived useful of information provided during the consultation, and a parent having made a change in their professional life were negatively associated with a desire to space out appointments. The child's gender is not a significant factor in parents' preferences. CONCLUSIONS Adapting visit protocols could make the health system more efficient to respond to T1D patients and their parent's needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maude Laberge
- Operations and Decision Systems, Universite Laval Faculte des sciences de l'administration, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Monia Rekik
- Operations and Decision Systems, Universite Laval Faculte des sciences de l'administration, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kodjo Mawuegnigan Djiffa
- Operations and Decision Systems, Universite Laval Faculte des sciences de l'administration, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Herrmann A, Holler E, Edinger M, Eickmann S, Wolff D. A qualitative study on patients' and their support persons' preferences for receiving one longer consultation or two shorter consultations when being informed about allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:623. [PMID: 34187476 PMCID: PMC8241532 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06632-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is the only potentially curative treatment option for many patients with hematological disorders but it includes a significant risk of mortality and long-term morbidity. Many patients and their support persons feel overwhelmed when being informed about alloHSCT and may benefit from improvements in consultation style and timing. Aims To explore, qualitatively, in a sample of hematological cancer patients and their support persons, their preferences for receiving one longer consultation or two shorter consultations when being informed about alloHSCT. Participants’ perceptions of when and how different consultation styles should be offered were also examined. Methods Semi-structured face-to-face and phone interviews were conducted. A purposeful sampling frame was used. Data were analysed using framework analysis. Results Twenty patients and 13 support persons were recruited (consent rate: 96%, response rate: 91%). Most patients (60%) and support persons (62%) preferred two shorter consultations over one longer consultation. This helped them digest and recall the information provided, remember questions they had, involve significant others and search for additional information. Patients would have liked to be offered paper and pen to take notes, take a break after 30 min and have their understanding checked at the end of the first consultation, e.g. using question prompt lists. Some patients and support persons preferred both consultations to happen on the same day to reduce waiting times as well as travel times and costs. Others preferred having a few days in-between both consultations to better help them prepare the second consultation. Participants reported varying preferences for different consultation styles depending on personal and disease-related characteristics, such as age, health literacy level and previous treatment. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first qualitative study to explore patients’ and their support persons’ preferences for having one longer consultation or two shorter consultations when being informed about alloHSCT. Receiving two shorter consultations may help patients process and recall the information provided and more actively involve their support persons. Clinicians should consider offering patients and their support persons to take a break after 30 min, provide paper and pen as well as question prompt lists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Herrmann
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Medical Sociology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. .,School of Medicine and Public Health/University of Newcastle and Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia.
| | - Ernst Holler
- Department of Haematology and Internal Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Edinger
- Department of Haematology and Internal Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Sascha Eickmann
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Medical Sociology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Wolff
- Department of Haematology and Internal Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Taylor J, Fradgley EA, Clinton-McHarg T, Hall A, Paul CL. Referral and uptake of services by distressed callers to the Cancer Council Information and Support telephone service. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2021; 18:303-310. [PMID: 34185960 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-centered cancer care includes emotional, informational, and practical support that is personalised to the needs of patients and inclusive of family and friends. However, when supportive care referrals are offered in hospital settings, distressed patients and carers do not consistently act on those referrals, which can prolong patient suffering. The degree to which sub-optimal referral uptake also occurs in Australian telephone support services is unknown. AIMS To report, among a sample of distressed patients and caregivers who called a cancer information and support service: 1) the types of services used; 2) proportion who received and actioned a referral (uptake); 3) associations between referral to a service and callers' characteristics); and, 4) associations between uptake of a referred service and callers' characteristics. METHODS This study used cross-sectional data collected at 3-month post-baseline from control participants (usual care group) enrolled in the Structured Triage and Referral by Telephone (START) trial. The START trial recruited distressed adult cancer patients and caregivers from the Cancer Council Information and Support Service (CIS). A research assistant conducted a 30-45 min telephone interview with participants, which included recall of referrals provided by CIS staff and reported uptake of referral(s) to the offered service types. RESULTS Most patients (98%) and caregivers (97%) reported receiving a referral to a service. For patients and caregivers respectively, information materials (71%, 77%), CIS call-back (51%, 43%), practical services (52%, 45%), and group peer support (49%, 51%) were the services most frequently offered. For callers receiving a referral, uptake was highest for information materials (91%) and CIS call-backs (89%) and lowest for specialist psychological services (30%). Significant association was found between older age and reduced uptake of services (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION The high uptake rate of CIS call-backs suggests it is a potentially more acceptable form of support compared to specialist psychological services. Efforts to reduce the barriers to telephone-based psychological services are required. Specifically, older age peoples' and caregivers' preferences for support and priorities who may benefit from a referral coordinator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Taylor
- School of Medicine and Public health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Cancer Research Innovation and Translation, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elizabeth A Fradgley
- School of Medicine and Public health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Cancer Research Innovation and Translation, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Cancer Institute New South Wales, Cancer Institute New South Wales, Eveleigh, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tara Clinton-McHarg
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Cancer Research Innovation and Translation, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alix Hall
- School of Medicine and Public health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Area Health Service, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christine L Paul
- School of Medicine and Public health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Cancer Research Innovation and Translation, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Apadula L, Capurso G, Arcidiacono PG. Patient-reported experience measure in pancreatobiliary endoscopy: a systematic review to highlight areas for improvement. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 33:832-838. [PMID: 33136730 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000001957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Increasing attention is paid to measure patient's experience using specific patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) as tool to assess the overall quality of care provided. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and the United European Gastroenterology have recognized the measure of quality of endoscopy facilities as a priority to provide an adequate service. However, although some studies included patient satisfaction measurement, specific PREMs for gastrointestinal endoscopy are limited, especially in the field of pancreatobiliary endoscopy, with heterogeneous methods and results. This study is aimed at systematically reviewing the literature to summarize the available PREMs for pancreatobiliary endoscopy and to highlight areas of implementation. METHODS PubMed, Embase and Scopus were searched until February 2020. RESULTS The search initially retrieved 1064 articles, but only six were includable. The identified studies employed several methods to measure patient's experience, with the most frequently used questionnaires being Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Satisfaction Questionnaire and Group Health Association of America-9. The following areas that need implementation were identified: (a) evaluation of pain is one of the most investigated areas but seems marginal, as most pancreatobiliary endoscopic procedures are performed under deep sedation; (b) endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography are considered as a whole, but they have very different indication and contexts (e.g. inpatients or outpatients); (c) 'experience' and 'satisfaction' are wrongly considered as synonyms; (d) the optimal modality and timing of questionnaire administration are unclear. CONCLUSION There are few tools to measure PREMS in pancreatobiliary endoscopy with several limitations. We have, therefore, started the process of building a specific PREM tool for pancreatobiliary EUS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Apadula
- Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Carey ML, Uchida M, Zucca AC, Okuyama T, Akechi T, Sanson-Fisher RW. Experiences of Patient-Centered Care Among Japanese and Australian Cancer Outpatients: Results of a Cross-Sectional Study. J Patient Exp 2021; 8:23743735211007690. [PMID: 34179419 PMCID: PMC8205376 DOI: 10.1177/23743735211007690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
There have been few international comparisons of patient-centered cancer care delivery. This study aimed to compare the experiences of patient-centered care (PCC) of Japanese and Australian radiation oncology patients. Participants were adults with cancer attending a radiotherapy appointment at a Japanese or Australian clinic. Participants completed a survey asking about 10 indicators of PCC. Overall, 259 Japanese and 285 Australian patients participated. Compared with Japanese participants, Australian participants were significantly more likely to report receiving information about: what the treatment is, and the short-term and long-term side effects of treatment. A higher proportion of Australian participants reported being asked whether they wanted a friend or family member present at the consultation. There were no differences in the frequency with which Japanese and Australian participants were asked by their clinicians about whether they were experiencing physical side effects or emotional distress. International differences highlight the (1) need to exercise caution when generalizing from one country to another; and (2) the importance of context in understanding PCC delivery and the subsequent design of quality improvement interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariko L Carey
- Health Behavior Research Collaborative, Faculty of Health and
Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan,
New South Wales, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behavior, University of
Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South
Wales, Australia
| | - Megumi Uchida
- Department of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya
City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
- Division of Palliative Care and Psycho-oncology, Nagoya City
University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Alison C Zucca
- Health Behavior Research Collaborative, Faculty of Health and
Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan,
New South Wales, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behavior, University of
Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South
Wales, Australia
| | - Toru Okuyama
- Department of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya
City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
- Division of Palliative Care and Psycho-oncology, Nagoya City
University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tatsuo Akechi
- Department of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya
City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
- Division of Palliative Care and Psycho-oncology, Nagoya City
University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Rob W Sanson-Fisher
- Health Behavior Research Collaborative, Faculty of Health and
Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan,
New South Wales, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behavior, University of
Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South
Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cuthbert CA, Farragher JF, Farrer CL, Cheung WY. Living with paradox: A qualitative study of colorectal cancer patients' experiences in managing their health after cancer treatment. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2021; 30:e13416. [PMID: 33506569 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Managing one's health after colorectal cancer may present specific challenges given long-term impacts to biopsychosocial functioning. Understanding experiences of managing one's health post-treatment is important to informing patient-centred supportive care. METHODS A qualitative study with 19 patients who had completed treatment for colorectal cancer to explore the experience of managing one's health. Following Thorne's Interpretive Description, we conducted interviews using either focus groups or individual interviews. Transcribed data were analysed following Thorne's approach. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were also collected. RESULTS The metaphor of living with paradox was the main theme characterising the experiences of managing one's health in the post-treatment period. Participants described the ambiguity of health, their need to accept the new normal, losing control and taking back control, experiencing positive and negative life changes, and the need to continually reframe their perspectives to focus on the positives. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that providing patient-centred care to colorectal cancer survivors post-treatment involves recognising their changing and sometimes conflicting experiences. Their ability to manage their health may fluctuate and their supportive care needs may not fit with a particular trajectory. Cancer care systems should strive for flexibility in the structure and timing of support available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colleen A Cuthbert
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Janine F Farragher
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Christie L Farrer
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Winson Y Cheung
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,CancerControl, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Herrmann A, Mansfield E, Tzelepis F, Lynagh M, Hall A. Use of the supportive care framework to explore haematological cancer survivors' unmet needs: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:1062. [PMID: 33228652 PMCID: PMC7686725 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05927-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Some sub-types of haematological cancers are acute and require intensive treatment soon after diagnosis. Other sub-types are chronic, relapse over many years and require life-long cycles of monitoring interspersed with bouts of treatment. This often results in significant uncertainty about the future, high levels of depression and anxiety, and reduced quality of life. Little is known about how to improve care for haematological cancer survivors. This study explored qualitatively, in a sample of haematological cancer survivors, (i) their unmet needs experienced as a result of their disease and treatment; and (ii) strategies that may help address these needs. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 adult haematological cancer survivors. Data was analysed using qualitative content analysis. The Supportive Care Framework guided data collection and analysis. Results Participants had a mean age of 57 years (SD 13). Most were male (n = 10, 59%). Five themes emerged from the data: (i) changes in unmet needs across the care trajectory (with greatest unmet needs experienced soon after diagnosis, at discharge from hospital and with cancer recurrence); (ii) informational unmet needs requiring improved patient-centred communication; (iii) uncertainty about treatment and the future; (iv) coordinated, tailored and documented post-treatment care planning as a strategy for optimal care delivery; and (v) ongoing support services to meet psychosocial and practical unmet needs by involving peer support, less bureaucratic transport services and flexible work arrangements. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first qualitative investigation using the Supportive Care Framework to explore unmet needs of haematological cancer survivors. Our findings offer fresh insights into this important area of study. Written, take-home care plans which provide simple but tailored guidance on where to seek additional support may help decrease uncertainty and feelings of vulnerability post-treatment for adult haematological cancer survivors. Future research should further develop and test strategies aimed at addressing unmet needs of haematological cancer survivors identified in this study. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-020-05927-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Herrmann
- Department for Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Professorship for Medical Sociology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. .,Department of Haematology and Internal Oncology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. .,School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia. .,Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia.
| | - Elise Mansfield
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Flora Tzelepis
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Marita Lynagh
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Alix Hall
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia.,Clinical Research, Design and Statistics, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hobden B, Turon H, Waller A, Carey M, Proietto A, Sanson-Fisher R. Gaps in patient-centered follow-up cancer care: a cross sectional study. J Psychosoc Oncol 2020; 39:161-172. [PMID: 32915113 DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2020.1815925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective There are published guidelines on the care that should be provided to cancer patients upon finishing treatment (i.e. follow-up care). Gaps in care may arise where patients' reported experiences of care do not align with guideline recommendations. The aim of this study was to explore whether oncology patients report gaps in patient-centered follow-up care. Methods This study was a cross-sectional survey of adult cancer patients receiving follow-up care within four outpatient oncology clinics. Patients were approached in clinic waiting rooms and asked to complete an electronic survey. The survey examined patients' self-report of receiving six aspects of follow-up care. Results A total of 239 participants completed the survey (study consent rate = 83%). Only 49% of participants received all six items of care. Patients reported high rates of being told who to contact if they have any questions or concerns (95%); who to contact if signs or symptoms occur (91%); and what to expect in their follow-up care (90%). A lower proportion of patients indicated they were informed about the role of their GP after treatment has finished (79%); what symptoms or signs might suggest the cancer had returned (74%); or were given a written care plan (71%). Conclusions: The study highlights that there is a gap between some aspects of optimal patient-centered care, and the actual care received by patients. Health care providers and researchers should consider how to improve follow-up care experiences to ensure best practice cancer care delivery during this important stage in cancer survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Breanne Hobden
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Faculty of Health and Medicine, Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia
| | - Heidi Turon
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Faculty of Health and Medicine, Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia
| | - Amy Waller
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Faculty of Health and Medicine, Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia
| | - Mariko Carey
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Faculty of Health and Medicine, Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia
| | - Anthony Proietto
- Cancer Network, Hunter New England Local Health Network - HNELHN, New Lambton, Australia
| | - Rob Sanson-Fisher
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Faculty of Health and Medicine, Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Perceived quality of care and its associated factors among Chinese patients with advanced cancer: findings from the APPROACH study in Beijing. Support Care Cancer 2020; 29:1395-1401. [PMID: 32671564 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05559-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-perceived quality of care has become an increasingly important index within the healthcare setting. We examined patient-reported overall quality of care and patient experiences in three specific domains of care (physician communication, nursing care, and care coordination) in a sample of Chinese patients with advanced cancer. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted with stage IV cancer patients (N = 202) who were recruited from a public, tertiary hospital in Beijing. Study participants completed surveys administered by a research assistant. Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to examine the extent to which patient demographic factors (age, gender, socioeconomic status), disease/treatment factors, and domain-specific care were associated with overall quality of care. RESULTS A majority of patients reported overall quality of care scores that we were either excellent (23%) or very good (41%). Patients reported highest ratings in the domain of nursing care (M = 87.57, SD = 31.05), followed by physician communication (M = 68.93, SD = 32.30), and care coordination (M = 66.79, SD = 25.17). Better perceived physician communication (b = 0.17, p < 0.01), care coordination (b = 0.26, p < 0.01), and higher socioeconomic status (b = 11.30, p < 0.05) were associated with higher overall quality of care. CONCLUSIONS A majority of patients with advanced cancer in this Chinese hospital reported positive overall quality of care. Physician communication and care coordination are potential areas to focus on to improve patient-reported overall quality of care. Understanding perceptions of care quality will allow opportunities to improve delivery of healthcare.
Collapse
|
18
|
De Rosis S, Cerasuolo D, Nuti S. Using patient-reported measures to drive change in healthcare: the experience of the digital, continuous and systematic PREMs observatory in Italy. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:315. [PMID: 32299440 PMCID: PMC7161006 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05099-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) has great potential in healthcare service improvement, but a limited use. This paper presents an empirical case of PREMs innovation in Italy, to foster patient data use up to the ward level, by keeping strengths and addressing weaknesses of previous PREMs survey experiences. The paper reports key lessons learned in this ongoing experience of action research, directly involving practitioners. METHODS The aim of this paper is to present the results of an ongoing action research, encompassing the innovation of PREMs collection, reporting and use, currently adopted by 21 hospitals of two Italian regions. The continuous and systematic PREMs collection has been implemented between 2017 and 2019 and includes: a continuous web-based administration, using web-services; an augmented and positive questionnaire matching standard closed-ended questions with narrative sections; the inclusion and benchmarking of patient data within a shared performance evaluation system; public disclosure of aggregated anonymized data; a multi-level and real-time web-platform for reporting PREMs to professionals. The action research was carried out with practitioners in a real-life and complex context. The authors used multiple data sources and methods: observations, feedback of practitioners, collected during several workshops and meetings, and analysis of preliminary data on the survey implementation. RESULTS A continuous and systematic PREMs observatory was developed and adopted in two Italian regions. PREMs participation and response rates tend to increase over time, reaching stable percentages after the first months. Narrative feedback provide a 'positive narration' of episodes and behaviours that made the difference to patients and can inform quality improvement actions. Real-time reporting of quantitative and qualitative data is enabling a gratifying process of service improvement and people management at all the hospitals' levels. CONCLUSIONS The PREMs presented in this paper has been recognized by healthcare professionals and managers as a strategic and positive tool for improving an actual use of PREMs at system and ward levels, by measuring and highlighting positive deviances, such as compassionate behaviours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina De Rosis
- Management and Healthcare Laboratory (MeS), Institute of Management and EMbeDS, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, Pisa, Italy.
| | - Domenico Cerasuolo
- Management and Healthcare Laboratory (MeS), Institute of Management and EMbeDS, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, Pisa, Italy
| | - Sabina Nuti
- Management and Healthcare Laboratory (MeS), Institute of Management and EMbeDS, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sariman JA, Harris NM, Harvey D, Sansom-Daly UM. Experiences of Young People Living with Cancer in Nonmetropolitan Areas: A Review of the Literature. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2020; 9:133-144. [DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2019.0053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jodi A. Sariman
- Social work and Human Services, College of Arts, Society and Education (CASE), Division of Tropical Environments and Societies (DTES), James Cook University, Cairns, Australia
- Social Work, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Liaison Service, Cairns & Hinterland, Hospital and Health Service, Cairns, Australia
| | - Nonie M. Harris
- Social Work and Human Services, College of Arts, Society and Education (CASE), Division of Tropical Environments and Societies (DTES), James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
| | - Desley Harvey
- College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia
- Department of Allied Health, Cairns & Hinterland Hospital and Health Service, Cairns, Australia
| | - Ursula M. Sansom-Daly
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, L1 South Wing, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Youth Cancer Service, Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
|
21
|
Payne JB, Dance KV, Farone M, Phan A, Ho CD, Gutierrez M, Chen L, Flowers CR. Patient and caregiver perceptions of lymphoma care and research opportunities: A qualitative study. Cancer 2019; 125:4096-4104. [PMID: 31355929 PMCID: PMC6819209 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Revised: 05/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 08/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the number of lymphoma survivors has increased, the needs and research priorities of survivors and their caregivers rarely are examined and addressed. Determining the needs and priorities for this population requires an assessment of the attitudes and experiences of patients and caregivers. The authors conducted a qualitative study with lymphoma survivors and their caregivers to determine care needs and research priorities. METHODS In the first phase, 2 semistructured focus groups were conducted with 15 lymphoma survivors and their caregivers. In phase 2, a total of 19 individual semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with lymphoma survivors and their caregivers. In both phases, participants discussed cancer experiences and research priorities. All interviews were transcribed. MAXQDA software (version 18.0.8) was used for coding and identifying themes. RESULTS The majority of participants felt disconnected from their clinical care team due to a lack of communication. Focus group participants noted a lack of information regarding diagnoses, treatment, research, and survivorship care. Participants coped with fear through strong social support and fostering relationships with their clinical care teams. Some caregivers felt completely ignored by clinicians. Participants expressed interest in research, but had difficulty finding relevant studies. Several interviewees desired holistic and survivorship-oriented research and more studies regarding quality of life and mental health. CONCLUSIONS The results of the current study identified unmet needs in clinical care and patient-oriented research, including needs for a focus on quality of life after treatment, communication between patients and the scientific community, and emotional well-being. Health care professionals can use these data to provide care delivery, supportive services, and research that meets the needs of lymphoma survivors and their caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackelyn B. Payne
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University – Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA
- Stony Brook University
| | - Kaylin V. Dance
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University – Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University
| | - Monique Farone
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University – Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University
| | - Anh Phan
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University – Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University
| | - Cathy D. Ho
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University – Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Lillian Chen
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University – Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University
| | - Christopher R. Flowers
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University – Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sanson-Fisher R, Fakes K, Waller A, Mackenzie L, Bryant J, Herrmann A. Assessing patients' experiences of cancer care across the treatment pathway: a mapping review of recent psychosocial cancer care publications. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27:1997-2006. [PMID: 30891626 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04740-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients are a critical source of information about the quality of the components of cancer care that contributes to optimal psychosocial outcomes. Recently published research was examined to determine the: (1) proportion of studies that examined at least one of 14 components of cancer care, (2) the proportion of studies that included multiple components of care, and (3) the phase of the cancer care pathway in which data collection occurred (i.e. pre-, during and post-treatment). METHODS MEDLINE was searched to retrieve all data-based publications indexed for two international psychosocial cancer care journals (Supportive Care in Cancer and Psycho-Oncology) over a 2-year period. A total of 333 publications yielded 214 eligible publications that were assessed against the 14 components of care for which measurement by healthcare providers at multiple phases during cancer care is recommended. Publications were coded based on the: (1) specific component/s of care focused upon in the research, (2) number of components examined and (3) timing of data collection. RESULTS The most frequently assessed component of care was physical and psychosocial screening (n = 198, 93%). Most studies (n = 187, 87%) examined a single component of care. No studies assessed all 14 components. Only seven studies (2.1%) examined components of care across multiple phases of the care pathway. CONCLUSIONS Recently published studies have examined limited segments of patients' experiences of cancer care. To improve psychosocial outcomes among people living with and beyond cancer, there should be a greater focus on patients' experiences across multiple components and the whole care pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rob Sanson-Fisher
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, HMRI Building Level 4, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. .,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia. .,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.
| | - Kristy Fakes
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, HMRI Building Level 4, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Amy Waller
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, HMRI Building Level 4, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Lisa Mackenzie
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, HMRI Building Level 4, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Jamie Bryant
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, HMRI Building Level 4, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Anne Herrmann
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, HMRI Building Level 4, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Schölvinck AFM, de Graaff BMB, van den Beld MJ, Broerse JEW. Research in haematological cancers: What do patients in the Netherlands prioritise? Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019; 28:e12989. [PMID: 30675743 PMCID: PMC9285610 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2017] [Revised: 11/11/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The experiential knowledge of patients can provide research communities with complementary perspectives on disease. The aim of this study was to identify and prioritise everyday problems and research needs of haematological cancer patients and people who have undergone a stem cell transplantation. METHODS A mixed-method participatory research approach (the Dialogue Model) was applied, including interviews (n = 19), four focus group discussions (n = 27), a questionnaire (n = 146) and a stakeholder dialogue meeting (n = 30) with patients in the Netherlands. RESULTS Patients' physical discomfort, psychosocial issues, problems with the healthcare system and policy issues were highlighted. Respondents prioritise research aimed at factors potentially influencing survival, such as lifestyle, and research aimed at improving patients' quality of life, for example improving memory and concentration problems. Topics also focused on physical discomfort, causal mechanisms, and healthcare organisation and policies. Research of a social scientific character is underrepresented, and as such, patients' everyday problems are not all directly reflected in the research agenda. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that patients, besides emphasising the importance of improving survival, have a clear desire to increase control over their lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bert M B de Graaff
- Department of Health Care Governance, Institute of Health Policy and Management (iBMG), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jacqueline E W Broerse
- Innovation and Communication in Health/Life Sciences (with a focus on diversity and inclusion), Faculty of Science, Athena Institute, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Step MM, Ferber GA, Downs-Holmes C, Silverman P. Feasibility of a team based prognosis and treatment goal discussion (T-PAT) with women diagnosed with advanced breast cancer. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:77-84. [PMID: 30150125 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2018] [Revised: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/10/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility of a team-based prognosis and treatment goal discussion for women living with advanced breast cancer. METHODS Female patients diagnosed with advanced breast cancer (n = 25) participated in a mixed methods study that evaluated the feasibility and effects of a planned and structured prognosis discussion. Audio analysis of the intervention appointments was conducted to assess intervention feasibility. Patient self-reports of prognosis related beliefs and treatment preferences were compared across intervention and usual care groups. RESULTS Most patients found the T-PAT appointment challenging but worthwhile. Intervention uptake by clinicians was good, but some fidelity disruptions were noted. T-PAT participants were more likely to hold realistic beliefs about disease curability after the appointment. CONCLUSION Productive prognosis discussions can be delivered effectively by a practice-based clinical team within a semi-structured patient education appointment. It was perceived by patients with advanced breast cancer as both valuable and acceptable. T-PAT clinicians found the intervention easy to deliver. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Regular implementation of T-PAT may help clinicians' build prognosis discussion communication skills. T-PAT documentation provides valuable information that can be used to tailor ongoing care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary M Step
- College of Public Health at Kent State University, Lowry Hall, 750 Hilltop Dr., Kent, OH, 44242, USA.
| | - Gretchen A Ferber
- Northeast Ohio Medical University, 4209 OH-44, Rootstown, OH, 44272, USA
| | - Catherine Downs-Holmes
- University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, 11100 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Paula Silverman
- School of Medicine at Case Western Reserve University, 11000 Cedar Ave, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Larnebratt A, Fomichov V, Björnsson B, Sandström P, Lindhoff Larsson A, Drott J. Information is the key to successful participation for patients receiving surgery for upper gastrointestinal cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2018; 28:e12959. [DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2018] [Revised: 09/04/2018] [Accepted: 10/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Anton Larnebratt
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland; Linköping University; Linköping Sweden
| | - Victoria Fomichov
- Development County Council of Östergötland; Linköping University; Linköping Sweden
| | - Bergthor Björnsson
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland; Linköping University; Linköping Sweden
| | - Per Sandström
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland; Linköping University; Linköping Sweden
| | - Anna Lindhoff Larsson
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland; Linköping University; Linköping Sweden
| | - Jenny Drott
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Department of Surgery, County Council of Östergötland; Linköping University; Linköping Sweden
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Division of Nursing Science; Linköping University; Linköping Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Watson R, Bryant J, Sanson-Fisher R, Turon H, Hyde L, Herrmann A. Do haematological cancer patients get the information they need about their cancer and its treatment? Results of a cross-sectional survey. Support Care Cancer 2018; 27:1509-1517. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4525-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2018] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
27
|
Goebel S, Mederer D, Mehdorn HM. Surgery-Related Coping in Surgery Patients with Intracranial Tumors. World Neurosurg 2018; 116:e775-e782. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2017] [Revised: 05/13/2018] [Accepted: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
28
|
Herrmann A, Hall A, Sanson-Fisher R, Zdenkowski N, Watson R, Turon H. Not asking cancer patients about their preferences does make a difference. A cross-sectional study examining cancer patients' preferred and perceived role in decision-making regarding their last important cancer treatment. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2018; 27:e12871. [PMID: 29900611 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2017] [Revised: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 05/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
We examined whether not having been asked by their clinicians about how involved cancer patients would like to be in their treatment decisions is related to discordance between patients' preferred and perceived involvement in treatment decision-making. This was a cross-sectional survey of adult cancer patients recruited from five medical and radiation oncology outpatient clinics in Australia. Discordance of patients' preferred and perceived decision-making roles was assessed via an adapted version of the Control Preferences Scale. Logistic regression modelling was conducted to assess the relationship between role discordance and whether patients were not asked but wanted to be asked about how involved they would like to be in deciding on their treatment. Of 423 study participants, almost a third (n = 128, 31%) reported discordance between their preferred and perceived involvement in their treatment decisions. Of those reporting discordance, 72% (n = 92) were less involved than they would have liked to have been. Not being asked about their preferences for involvement in treatment decisions, despite wanting this, was associated with discordance between patients' preferred and perceived involvement in treatment decision-making (p < 0.04). To achieve patient-centred care, it is vital that clinicians seek patients' views about how involved they would like to be in deciding on their cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Herrmann
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle/Hunter Medical Research Institute, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Alix Hall
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle/Hunter Medical Research Institute, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Rob Sanson-Fisher
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle/Hunter Medical Research Institute, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicholas Zdenkowski
- Department of Medical Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW, Australia
| | - Rochelle Watson
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle/Hunter Medical Research Institute, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Heidi Turon
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle/Hunter Medical Research Institute, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
This article looks at what anarchism has to offer in debates concerning health and healthcare. I present the case that anarchism's interest in supporting the poor, sick, and marginalized, and rejection of state and corporate power, places it in a good position to offer creative ways to address health problems. I maintain that anarchistic values of autonomy, responsibility, solidarity, and community are central to this endeavor. Rather than presenting a case that follows one particular anarchist theory, my main goal is to raise issues and initiate debate in this underresearched field in mainstream bioethics.
Collapse
|
30
|
Dencker A, Kristiansen M, Rix BA, Bøge P, Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T. Contextualisation of patient-centred care: A comparative qualitative study of healthcare professionals' approaches to communicating with seriously ill patients about their dependent children. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2017; 27. [PMID: 29114990 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Patients' family relations play an important part in the provision of patient-centred cancer care, not least when healthcare professionals encounter seriously ill patients with dependent children. Little is known about how children are perceived and dealt with in clinical encounters. In this qualitative comparative study, we explore the influence of medical contexts in three Danish hospital wards, haematology, oncological gynaecology and neuro-intensive care, on communication with patients about their children. In exploring the degree to which the inclusion of children in clinical encounters is dependent on context, we took a comparative approach based on fieldwork in wards either exclusively focusing on cancer treatment or partially involved in critical phases of cancer treatment. We conducted 49 semi-structured, in-depth interviews with doctors and nurses, and 27 days of participant observation. The thematic analysis was based on Bateson's conceptualisation of communication. We found that healthcare professionals' approach to children in clinical encounters and the ways in which children were positioned on each ward were influenced by aspects specific to the ward, including the diagnosis and treatments that related specifically to the patient. Our findings suggest the need to explore further the influence of medical contexts on the inclusion of children in patient communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Dencker
- Patient Support & Community Activities, The Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.,National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M Kristiansen
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - B A Rix
- Patient Support & Community Activities, The Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - P Bøge
- Patient Support & Community Activities, The Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - T Tjørnhøj-Thomsen
- National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
A discrete choice experiment to assess cancer patients' preferences for when and how to make treatment decisions. Support Care Cancer 2017; 26:1215-1220. [PMID: 29090384 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-017-3944-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cancer patients can be overwhelmed when being confronted with their diagnosis and treatment options. Such information is often provided during one consultation between the patient and treating clinician. In order to achieve optimal cancer care, there may be justification for alternative consultation styles. We assessed, in a sample of adult medical oncology patients, their preferences for (i) attending one 40-min consultation or two 20-min consultations and (ii) receiving written only or both written and online information, when making a cancer treatment decision. METHODS This was a cross-sectional survey using a discrete choice design of 159 adult medical oncology patients presenting for their second or subsequent outpatient consultation. Participants were presented with a set of hypothetical scenarios and asked to indicate their most and least preferred scenario. The scenarios contained a caveat explaining that there would be no difference between the available treatment options in terms of when treatment would be initiated and the impact it would have on patients' life expectancy. RESULTS One hundred forty-seven patients completed the DCE. Of these, 70% (n = 103) preferred being provided with written and online information rather than just written information. This preference was statistically significant (p < 0.01). Fifty-nine percent (n = 86) of patients preferred two 20-min consultations over one 40-min consultation when making a treatment decision. Significantly, more patients preferred two shorter consultations rather than one longer consultation when this was combined with written and online information (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION When making a cancer treatment decision, clinicians should consider offering patients written and online information, combined with two shorter consultations.
Collapse
|
32
|
Bisschop JAS, Kloosterman FR, van Leijen-Zeelenberg JE, Huismans GW, Kremer B, Kross KW. Experiences and preferences of patients visiting a head and neck oncology outpatient clinic: a qualitative study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274:2245-2252. [PMID: 28132135 PMCID: PMC5383674 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4453-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2016] [Accepted: 01/04/2017] [Indexed: 10/30/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study is to report on an in-depth evaluation of patient experiences and preferences at a Head and Neck Oncology outpatient clinic. A qualitative research design was used to determine the experiences and preferences of Head and Neck Cancer patients in an Oncology Outpatient Clinic, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands. Head and Neck Cancer Patients, treated for at least 6 months at the Oncology Clinic, were included. A qualitative research design with patient interviews was used. All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim to increase validity. Analysis was done with use of the template approach and qualitative data analysis software. Three of the six dimensions predominated in the interview: (1) respect for patients' values, preferences and expressed need, (2) information, communication and education and (3) involvement of family and friends. The dimensions physical comfort; emotional support; coordination and integration of care were considered to be of less significance. The findings from this study resulted in a deeper understanding of patients' experiences and preferences and can be useful in the transition towards a more patient-centered approach of health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeroen A S Bisschop
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Fabienne R Kloosterman
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Geert Willem Huismans
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bernd Kremer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kenneth W Kross
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|