Impact of Azelnidipine and Amlodipine on Left Ventricular Mass and Longitudinal Function in Hypertensive Patients with Left Ventricular Hypertrophy

Cardiac response to hypertension treatment: an advanced echocardiographic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is the most common reversible cause of cardiovascular disease worldwide and more than one billion individuals suffer from the disease. Constant heart exposure to increased afterload progresses to maladaptive remodeling, leading to cardiac dysfunction. In this study, we aimed to evaluate cardiac function in response to hypertension treatment.

METHODS

One hundred patients diagnosed with hypertension were evaluated two times, with 3 to 6 months intervals, before and after antihypertensive therapy. Patients underwent clinical and echocardiographic evaluation in both visits and the interest effect of antihypertensive therapy on cardiac function was studied.

RESULTS

58 men and 42 women with a mean age of 60.81 ± 11.8 years were studied. Mean systolic and diastolic pressure in the first visit was 163.05 ± 20.6 and 95.40 ± 10.4, respectively. On the second visit, mean systolic and diastolic pressure was 129.95 ± 10.4 and 82.35 ± 7.2 respectively (P value for both < 0.001). The mean value of Global Longitudinal Strain as the main parameter for evaluating left ventricular systolic function was -15.54% on the first visit and changed to -16.95% on the second visit (P value 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

According to the results of this study, changes in parameters, indicator of systolic and diastolic function, after 3-6 months of antihypertensive therapy are significant. The most important point is that maladaptive remodeling of the heart is reversible if hypertension is diagnosed timely. To follow-up patients under antihypertensive therapy, GLS and parameters indicator of diastolic dysfunction, have the best diagnostic value in terms of detecting early stages of cardiac injury.

Efficacy and Safety of Azelnidipine as an Antihypertensive Compared to Amlodipine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Azelnidipine is one of the newer Calcium Channel Blockers (CCB) approved in China, Japan, and India. Some studies have found that the blood pressure-lowering effect of azelnidipine is more than amlodipine, and others found the effect similar.

AIM

This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of azelnidipine in managing hypertensive patients by lowering Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), and Heart Rate (HR) as compared to amlodipine.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, PROQUEST, and International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP) were searched for published articles to evaluate the clinical efficacy of azelnidipine in the management of hypertension patients. Data were extracted from the selected 11 randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The risk of bias 2 (RoB2) tool was used for the quality assessment of the included studies, and the random-effects model was used to estimate the effect size.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the reduction of SBP (Mean Difference, MD: - 1.07; 95% CI: - 4.10, 1.95, p-value: 0.49) and DBP (MD: 0.27; 95% CI: - 2.66, 3.20, p-value: 0.86) between both the drugs. In terms of HR reduction, there was a statistically significant difference (MD: - 3.63; 95% CI: - 5.27, - 2.00, p-value: < 0.0001) between both drugs. Egger's test excluded any publication bias for the included studies (p = 0.21). Meta-regression excluded the effect of the duration of treatment on outcome parameters.

CONCLUSION

Though no significant difference between azelnidipine and amlodipine was found, in terms of reduction in SBP and DBP, azelnidipine reduced heart rate significantly compared to amlodipine.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42023390361.

Blood pressure control and left ventricular echocardiographic progression in hypertensive patients: an 18-month follow-up study

Objectives

The impact of blood pressure (BP) control and its timing on left ventricular (LV) structure and function remains unclear. The present study was to evaluate whether BP control correlated with conventional LV geometry and function indexes or global longitudinal strain (GLS) progression, and when echocardiographic changes would occur in essential hypertension.

Methods and results

A total of 62 participants (mean age 55.2 ± 11.5, male 71.0%) with uncontrolled hypertension were enrolled in the longitudinal study. Patients were followed up at the 6-month and 18-month, when echocardiographic measurements were performed and BP control was evaluated during the follow up period. At the 6- and 18-month examination, we divided the hypertensive patients into two groups as BP controlled and uncontrolled group. Patients with BP uncontrolled (n = 33) had higher LV mass index (P = 0.02), higher left atrial volume index (P = 0.01), worse GLS (P = 0.005) and GLS changes (P = 0.003) compared with controlled BP (n = 29) at the 6-month follow-up examination. Patients with uncontrolled BP (n = 25) had higher LV mass index (P = 0.001), higher LV mass index changes (P = 0.01), higher relative wall thickness (P = 0.01), higher E/e' (P = 0.046), worse GLS (P = 0.02) and GLS changes (P = 0.02) compared to BP controlled group (n = 24) at the 18-month follow-up examination. GLS changes were associated with BP control (β = 0.370, P = 0.004 at the 6-month examination and β = 0.324, P = 0.02 at the 18-month examination, respectively) in stepwise multivariate regression analysis. LV mass index changes was corelated with systolic BP (β = 0.426, P = 0.003) at the 18-month follow-up examination in stepwise multivariate regression analysis. Neither was GLS changes nor LV mass index changes were related to antihypertensive medication class, including combination therapy in 6- or 18-month follow up examination.

Conclusions

Our findings offer new clinical evidence on the association of BP control with echocardiographic changes in hypertensive patients, and, in particular, support the view that GLS progression was earlier and subtler than conventional LV geometry and function parameters. GLS changes were significant between BP controlled and uncontrolled patients even in 6-month follow-up period.

Hypertensive heart disease: risk factors, complications and mechanisms

Hypertensive heart disease constitutes functional and structural dysfunction and pathogenesis occurring primarily in the left ventricle, the left atrium and the coronary arteries due to chronic uncontrolled hypertension. Hypertensive heart disease is underreported and the mechanisms underlying its correlates and complications are not well elaborated. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of hypertensive heart disease, we discuss in detail the mechanisms associated with development and complications of hypertensive heart disease especially left ventricular hypertrophy, atrial fibrillation, heart failure and coronary artery disease. We also briefly highlight the role of dietary salt, immunity and genetic predisposition in hypertensive heart disease pathogenesis.

Therapeutic Usefulness of a Novel Calcium Channel Blocker Azelnidipine in the Treatment of Hypertension: A Narrative Review

The prevalence of hypertension and comorbidities such as metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease in India is alarmingly high. Amlodipine, an older-generation calcium channel blocker (CCB), is currently the gold standard for hypertension management in India. However, it has several disadvantages, including reflex tachycardia and pedal edema. Therefore, an effective antihypertensive agent that does not cause these adverse effects and provides end-organ protection is required for the holistic management of hypertension in the country. Azelnidipine is a new-generation CCB that has recently been approved for the treatment of hypertension in India. This review provides an overview of the utility of azelnidipine for hypertension control, including comparisons with traditional CCBs such as amlodipine. It discusses the key antihypertensive effects of azelnidipine as well as its advantages in the prevention of tachycardia and associated complications. In addition, this review highlights the extensive cardio- and renoprotective activities of azelnidipine, including its effects on systolic and diastolic function and urinary albumin excretion. Overall, this substantial body of evidence supports the use of azelnidipine for the treatment of hypertension, especially in India. It suggests that the adoption of azelnidipine as the new gold standard CCB could help India battle its hypertension epidemic.

Subclinical HMOD in Hypertension: Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction

Arterial hypertension represents an important risk factor for the development of cardiac, vascular and renal events, predisposing to heart failure, acute coronary syndromes, peripheral artery disease, stroke, and chronic renal disease. Arterial hypertension leads to the development of subclinical hypertension mediated organ damage (HMOD) which has prognostic relevance and may influence the choice of treatment options. Alterations of cardiac structure and function represent the more widely assessed form of HMOD. This manuscript will focus on the diagnostic opportunities, prognostic significance and treatment of diastolic dysfunction alterations.

The impact of medical therapy on left ventricular strain: Current state and future perspectives

The speckle tracking strain is becoming a frequently used marker of subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Despite the wide range of data concerning left ventricular strain variability in the general population and its changes in various pathologic conditions, the information about the impact of medical therapy on left ventricle strain is limited. This article provides an analysis of published studies of left ventricle strain changes in response to different agents and combinations of medical therapies used for hypertension and congestive heart failure.

24-Hour Blood Pressure Control with Amlodipine: A Review of the Current Scenario

Introduction Hypertension is the leading cause of cardiovascular diseases and premature death worldwide. Antihypertensive therapy using calcium channel blockers (CCBs) is one of the preferred choices to treat blood pressure (BP) and control blood pressure variability (BPV). In contrast to clinic BP, 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) has evolved into an accurate and reproducible tool for the assessment and management of hypertension. Amlodipine, a longer acting dihydropyridine CCB is effective for 24 hours BP control and also minimizing BPV. The present article is the comprehensive review highlighting the efficacy of amlodipine in controlling 24-hour BP and minimizing BPV from the review of recent studies.

Materials and Methods The literature search was done using PubMed, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE databases. The studies to be included for review, were identified through the keywords: “amlodipine,” “ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM),”“blood pressure variability (BPV),” “CCBs,” and filtering articles published in English language only.

Results Pharmacological evidence suggests that amlodipine has the ability to block all the subtypes of CCBs such as L-, N-, P-, Q-, R-, and T-type. Various clinical studies reported that amlodipine is a powerful, well-tolerated, and safe antihypertensive agent which is widely used either alone or as a key component of combination therapy for control of 24 hours BP.

Conclusion Overall, amlodipine is a proven and effective antihypertensive drug and helpful in controlling 24-hour BP, minimizing BP variability and hence reducing the risk of cardiovascular complications.

Effect of long-term antihypertensive therapy on myocardial strain: a meta-analysis

AIM

Evidence on the impact of blood pressure (BP)-lowering drugs on left ventricular (LV) mechanics in hypertension is still limited. We performed a meta-analysis of speckle-tracking echocardiographic studies in order to provide a new piece of information on this topic.

METHODS

The PubMed, OVID-MEDLINE, and Cochrane library databases were analysed to search for articles published from the inception up to 31 October 2021. Studies were identified by using MeSH terms and crossing the following search items: 'myocardial strain', 'left ventricular mechanics', 'speckle tracking echocardiography', 'systolic dysfunction', 'left ventricular hypertrophy', 'systemic hypertension', 'BP lowering drugs,' 'antihypertensive therapy'.

RESULTS

A total of 1140 hypertensive patients (mean age 55.4 years, 50% men, follow-up 6-36 months) were included in eight studies. Pretreatment and posttreatment pooled SBP/DBPs were 148.4 ± 3.5/88.7 ± 2 vs. 127.4 ± 1.9/77.8 ± 0.9 mmHg. Corresponding values for ejection fraction (EF), LV mass (LVM) index, and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were 64 ± 2.3 vs. 65.9 ± 1.7% (SMD: 0.14 ± 0.03, CI 0.08- 0.20, P = 0.001); 108.4 ± 11.2 vs. 100.2 ± 11.0 g/m2 (SMD: -0.27 ± 0.10, CI -0.46 to -0.08, P < 0.01); -17.7 ± 0.6 vs. -19.6 ± 0.4%, (SMD 0.26 ± 0.03, CI 0.20-0.32, P < 0.0001), respectively. A meta-regression analysis showed a significant relation between GLS improvement and the extent of reduction of LVMI (P = 0.0003), but not of SBP (P = 0.27).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis suggests that antihypertensive treatment has a clear beneficial effect on LV mechanisms, and the improvement in GLS is mainly related to the reduction in LVMI rather than SBP.

Left ventricular long-axis ultrasound strain (GLS) is an ideal indicator for patients with anti-hypertension treatment

BACKGROUND

Primary hypertension is one of the most well-known risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Currently, there is still no ideal indicator for left ventricular end-diastolic pressure.

METHODS

73 hypertension patients and 37 healthy people were enrolled in this study. Each member was examined with conventional echocardiography including multiple indicators such as Peak mitral valve flow velocity (E, A), E/A, left atrial volume index (LAVl), tissue Doppler (PW-TDI) peak velocities during early and late diastolic mitral valve flow (e '), E/e ', and GLS. We have collected clinical data from all enrolled members. The above cardiac ultrasound indicators were obtained before the antihypertensive treatment, one month and three months after treatment.

RESULTS

Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) was positively correlated and negatively correlated with GLS (r = 0.638, P < .01) and E/e' (r = -0.578, P < .05), respectively. The hypertensives had lower e' value and higher values of GLS, E/e', and LAVI than the control group (P < .05). GLS and E/e' were significantly lower in hypertension group than those in the Control group after one month and three months of treatment (P < .05). The improvement rate of GLS was significantly higher than those in the improvement rate of e', E/e', LAVI after treatment (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

The GLS improvement rate was significantly higher than those of e', E/e' after one and three-month treatment. Therefore, GLS might be a potential ideal index for patients with anti-hypertension treatment. The results obtained in this study provide useful information for further study.

Valsartan Versus Amlodipine Effect on Left Ventricular Multidirectional Deformation and Adipocytokines Levels in Hypertensive Patients: Speckle Tracking Echocardiography

INTRODUCTION

Structural and functional properties of the left ventricle (LV) wall have been reported to be altered in hypertension, even at early stages of the disease. Abnormal adipokine levels affect blood pressure regulation. Hypo-adiponectinaemia and hyper-leptinaemia were reported in hypertension.

AIM

To evaluate the effects of valsartan versus amlodipine on LV deformation also, on plasma adiponectin and leptin levels in hypertensive individuals.

METHODS

LV strain was measured by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography, plasma levels of adiponectin and leptin was determined in 30 healthy individuals served as control group and in 200 hypertensive patients before and after treatment for 6 months with either valsartan 160 mg or amlodipine 10 mg.

RESULTS

Compared to control group longitudinal strain was significantly affected in hypertensive patients, adiponectin was significantly lower while TNF-α, hs-CRP and leptin levels were significantly higher in hypertensive group. A significant improvement in LV functions, along with a decrease in leptin and increase in adiponectin levels in valsartan group compared to amlodipine group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that valsartan is superior to amlodipine when it comes to affecting the hormonal function of human adipose tissue. Valsartan has a beneficial effect on LV deformation and function presented in GLS.

Characteristics of the left ventricular three-dimensional maximum principal strain using cardiac computed tomography: reference values from subjects with normal cardiac function

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the characteristics of left ventricular maximum principal strain (LV-MPS) using cardiac CT in subjects with normal LV function.

METHODS

Of 973 subjects who underwent retrospective electrocardiogram-gated cardiac CT using a third-generation dual-source CT without beta-blocker administration, 31 subjects with preserved LV ejection fraction ≥ 55% assessed by echocardiography without coronary artery stenosis and cardiac pathology were retrospectively identified. CT images were reconstructed every 5% (0-95%) of the RR interval. LV-MPS and the time to peak (TTP) were analyzed using the 16-segment model and compared among three levels (base, mid, and apex) and among four regions (anterior, septum, inferior, and lateral) using the Steel-Dwass test. The intra- and inter-observer reproducibilities for LV-MPS were calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

RESULTS

The intra- and inter-observer ICCs (95% confidence interval) for peak LV-MPS were 0.96 (0.94-0.97) and 0.94 (0.92-0.96), respectively. The global peak LV-MPS (median, inter-quantile range) was 0.59 (0.55-0.72). The regional LV-MPS significantly increased in the order of the basal (0.54, 0.49-0.59), mid-LV (0.57, 0.53-0.65), and apex (0.68, 0.60-0.84) (p < 0.05, in each), and was significantly higher in the lateral wall (0.66, 0.60-0.77), while that in the septal region (0.47, 0.44-0.54) was the lowest among the four LV regions (all p < 0.05). No significant difference in TTP was seen among the myocardial levels and regions.

CONCLUSION

CT-derived LV-MPS is reproducible and quantitatively represents synchronized myocardial contraction with heterogeneous values in subjects with normal LV function.

KEY POINTS

• CT-derived left ventricular maximum principal strain analysis allows highly reproducible quantitative assessments of left ventricular myocardial contraction. • In subjects with normal cardiac function, the peak value of CT-derived left ventricular maximum principal strain is the highest in the apical level and in the lateral wall and the lowest in the septum. • The regional peak left ventricular maximum principal strain shows intra-ventricular heterogeneity on a per-patient basis, but myocardial contraction is globally synchronized in subjects with normal cardiac function seen on cardiac CT.

The Effect of Antihypertensive Therapy on Left Ventricular Longitudinal Strain: Missing Part of the Puzzle

There is no consensus regarding the benefit of antihypertensive therapy on left ventricular structure and function. The most of studies investigated the effect of therapy on left ventricular hypertrophy, less studies were focused on left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and the minority on left ventricular mechanics. The majority of investigations showed positive effect of antihypertensive therapy on regression of left ventricular remodeling. Nevertheless, it is very difficult to distinguish the effect of antihypertensive medication from the effect of blood pressure reduction on left ventricular improvement. The other important issue in these studies is difficulty to distinguish the effect of left ventricular hypertrophy regression from the effect of antihypertensive medications on left ventricular diastolic function and mechanics. The novel findings suggest that the cascade of left ventricular remodeling in hypertensive heart disease begins with mechanical changes, continuous with diastolic dysfunction, and ends with left ventricular hypertrophy. This is very important paradigm because it enables early and timely diagnosis of subclinical left ventricular damage in hypertensive patients and should provide rapid detection of left ventricular function improvement during antihypertensive therapy.

Effect of the Single-Pill Amlodipine/Valsartan Combination on Hypertrophy and Myocardial Deformation Characteristics in Middle-Aged Patients with Essential Arterial Hypertension

Aim. To investigate the impact of amlodipine/valsartan single-pill combination (A/V SPC) on left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and left ventricular (LV) myocardial strain and stiffness parameters in naїve middle-aged patients with stage II grade 1-2 essential arterial hypertension (EAH).Material and methods. A group of patients with stage II grade 1-2 EAH who had not previously received regular antihypertensive treatment (AHT) [n=38; mean age 49.7±7.0 years] was retrospectively formed. All the patients were treated with A/V SPC and all of them achieved target office blood pressure (BP) (less than 140/90 mm Hg). And after 12 weeks follow-up (since the time of reaching the target BP) the AHT effectiveness assessment, its impact on LVH and LV myocardial strain and stiffness parameters (general clinical data, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, conventional and 2D-speckle tracking echocardiography) were performed in all included patients.Results. The number of patients with LVH significantly (p=0.039) decreased from 25 individuals (65.8%) at baseline to 15 patients (39.5%) at the end of follow-up. Among patients with LVH at baseline after the treatment with A/V SPC significantly decreased (p<0.001 for all) interventricular septum thickness (from 1.36±0.19 to 1.28±0.18 cm), LV posterior wall thickness (from 1.08±0.09 to 0.97±0.11 cm) and the LV myocardial mass index (from 123.3±19.3 to 110.8±20.8 g/m2). At the end of follow-up end-systolic elastance significantly (p<0.001) decreased from 4.01±1.12 to 3.46±0.88 mm Hg/ml. In the subgroup of patients with reduced (in absolute value) LV longitudinal 2D-strain (n=27) at baseline, there was a significantly (p=0.005) increasing in this parameter at the end of the study (from -16.14±2.21% to -17.30±2.13%, Δ%=8.45±13.35).Conclusion. In naive patients 40-65 years old with stage II grade 1-2 EAH AHT with A/V SPC provides effective 24 hours BP control, significantly reduced LVH and improves LV strain parameters, which indicates decreasing of LV myocardial stiffness.

Association between long-term prescription of aldosterone antagonist and the progression of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in hypertensive patients

BACKGROUND

Hypertension complicated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and diastolic dysfunction is independently related to increasing risk of subsequent incident heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study was designed to evaluate the influences of long-term aldosterone antagonist prescription in these patients.

METHODS

Using a propensity score matching of 1:2 ratio, this retrospective claims database study compared spironolactone prescription (n=65) and non-spironolactone therapy (n=130) in hypertensive patients with LVH [left ventricular mass index (LVMI)>125g/m(2) for men and >110g/m(2) for women] and suspected diastolic dysfunction (E/E' ratio between 8 and 15) and without clinical signs or symptoms of heart failure.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 7.4years, the new-onset symptomatic HFpEF occurred in 3 of 65 patients in the spironolactone group and 21 of 130 patients in the non-spironolactone group (P=0.021). Spironolactone also generated more prominent improvement in diastolic function and LVH. And multivariate logistic regression model revealed that spironolactone prescription (OR 0.177, 95% CI: 0.045-0.687, P=0.012) was associated with a reduced risk of new onset of symptomatic HFpEF, and the elevation of LVMI (OR 1.053, 95% CI: 1.011-1.097, P=0.012) or E/E' (OR 1.280, 95% CI: 1.015-1.615, P=0.037) was associated with a high risk of new onset of symptomatic HFpEF.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term aldosterone antagonist exposure was associated with protective effects in terms of the incidence of new-onset symptomatic HFpEF, LV diastolic dysfunction and LVH in hypertensive patients, which might be beneficial for the delay of HFpEF progression.

Long-term prescription of beta-blocker delays the progression of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in patients with hypertension: A retrospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Hypertension complicated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and diastolic dysfunction is one of the most common risks for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study was designed to evaluate the influences of long-term beta-blocker prescription in these patients.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included eligible patients diagnosed with hypertension, LVH (left ventricular (LV) mass index >125 g/m(2) for men and >110 g/m(2) for women) and suspected diastolic dysfunction (E/E' ratio between 8 and 15) and without clinical signs or symptoms of heart failure in our hospital medical record database (January 2005-December 2009). A total of eligible 1498 patients were enrolled, of whom 803 received beta-blocker prescription and 695 accepted non-beta-blocker therapy.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 7.2 years, the new-onset symptomatic HFpEF occurred in 48 of 803 patients in the beta-blocker group (6.0%) and 92 of 695 patients in the non-beta-blocker group (13.2%, p < 0.001). Beta-blockers also generated more prominent improvement in diastolic function and LVH. And Cox proportional hazards model revealed that beta-blocker (hazard ratio (HR) 0.327, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.121-0.540, p = 0.009) or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB) exposure (HR 0.422, 95% CI: 0.210-0.699, p = 0.015) was associated with a reduced risk of new onset of symptomatic HFpEF, and the elevation of LVMI (HR 1.210, 95% CI: 1.069-1.362, p = 0.040) or E/E' (HR 1.398, 95% CI: 1.306-1.541, p = 0.032) was associated with a high risk of new onset of symptomatic HFpEF.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term beta-blocker exposure was associated with protective effects in terms of the incidence of new-onset symptomatic HFpEF, LV diastolic dysfunction and LVH, which might be beneficial for the delay of HFpEF progression.

Effect of Diuretic or Calcium-Channel Blocker Plus Angiotensin-Receptor Blocker on Diastolic Function in Hypertensive Patients

BACKGROUND

Hypertension increases the risk of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction, and anti-hypertensive therapy may improve LV relaxation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether combining an angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) with either hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) or a calcium-channel blocker (CCB) improves LV relaxation in patients with hypertension and diastolic dysfunction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Hypertensive patients who had not achieved their target blood pressure with at least 4 weeks of ARB therapy were randomly assigned to receive either a fixed-dose combination of losartan and HCTZ (losartan/HCTZ; n=110) or a combination of amlodipine and a typical ARB dosage (CCB/ARB; n=121) and followed for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in early diastolic mitral annular velocity (e', cm/s). Systolic blood pressure decreased in both groups after switch to the combination therapies. E' velocity increased both in the losartan/HCTZ (0.52 cm/s) and in the CCB/ARB (0.59 cm/s) groups. The mean (95% CI) treatment difference was -0.02 (-0.37 to 0.34) cm/s, indicating that improvement in LV relaxation was similar between the groups. The ratio of early mitral inflow velocity to e' velocity and left atrial volume index were significantly decreased in the losartan/HCTZ group.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of losartan and HCTZ is as effective as amlodipine plus ARB in improving LV relaxation in hypertensive patients.