Effects of Ranolazine on Noninvasive Coronary Flow Reserve in Patients with Myocardial Ischemia But without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

The role of coronary microcirculation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: An unceasing odyssey

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents an entity with complex pathophysiologic pathways, among which coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is believed to be an important orchestrator. Research in the field of CMD has highlighted impaired vasoreactivity, capillary rarefaction, and inflammation as potential mediators of its development. CMD can be diagnosed via several noninvasive methods including transthoracic echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography. Moreover, invasive methods such as coronary flow reserve and index of microcirculatory resistance are commonly employed in the assessment of CMD. As far as the association between CMD and HFpEF is concerned, numerous studies have highlighted the coexistence of CMD in the majority of HFpEF patients. Additionally, patients affected by both conditions may be facing an adverse prognosis. Finally, there is limited evidence suggesting a beneficial effect of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers, ranolazine, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in CMD, with further evidence being awaited regarding the impact of other pharmacotherapies such as anti-inflammatory agents.

"The INOCA-IT: Rationale and design of a multicenter registry investigating ischemia in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery (INOCA) disease in Italy"

BACKGROUND

Ischemia with non-obstructive coronary artery (INOCA) disease is being progressively acknowledged as one of the pathophysiological mechanisms of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) in an increasingly wide range of clinical pictures. Although the research has already begun to move towards a defined diagnostic pathway and a specific medical therapy for this disease, at present it remains a clinical challenge, especially if not thoroughly investigated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The INOCA IT Multicenter Registry RF-2019-12369486 is a prospective, multicentric, non-randomized, single-arm, open label clinical study which aims to evaluate the efficacy of a stratified diagnostic and therapeutic approach on adverse events prevention and symptom relief in Italian patients with INOCA disease. The study population includes patients with a clinical presentation of CCS for angina and/or positive stress test for myocardial ischemia and evidence of non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) at coronary angiography. In these patients a complete invasive coronary physiology assessment is performed with the guidewire-based measurement of coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microvascular resistance (IMR), followed by acetylcholine (ACh) spasm provocation test. On the basis of the results of coronary function testing, patients are stratified into different INOCA endotypes (coronary microvascular disease, vasospastic angina, microvascular spasm, non-cardiac chest pain) and given a tailored medical therapy in accordance with the latest scientific evidence. At one year follow-up the impact of such a target therapy on angina class and quality of life, as well as on cardiovascular adverse events (hospitalization and coronary revascularization) is evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

The INOCA-IT Multicenter Registry will inform clinicians on sex-specific prevalence of INOCA in Italy and will show the impact of a stratified diagnostic and therapeutic approach on symptoms burden and prognosis of INOCA patients.

The diagnosis and treatment of women with recurrent cardiac ischemia and normal coronary arteries

Cardiac disease is the leading cause of death in women. Among women with recurrent chest pain, abnormal electrocardiograms, and/or stress tests who undergo coronary angiography, as many as 50% have normal or <50% coronary artery obstructive disease. Pharmacologic stress assessment of coronary artery flow reserve in these women frequently demonstrates an inability to increase blood flow to >2.5 times normal flow. Contributory factors include abnormal epicardial or microvascular reactivity, microvascular remodeling or rarefaction, autonomic dysfunction, or coronary plaque rupture/erosion. Assessment is necessary of serum biomarkers and coronary artery flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, microvascular resistance, and epicardial/microvascular spasm. Aggressive treatment of women with positive tests is necessary because these women have an increased incidence of recurrent chest pain, repeated hospitalizations and coronary angiograms, and cardiac death.

Shedding Light on Treatment Options for Coronary Vasomotor Disorders: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Coronary vasomotor dysfunction embraces two specific clinical entities: coronary (micro)vascular spasm and microvascular dysfunction. The clinical manifestations of these entities are respectively called vasospastic angina (VSA) and microvascular angina (MVA). Over the years, these diseases have become more and more prominent and several studies aimed to investigate the best diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Patients with coronary vasomotor disorders are often undertreated due to the absence of evidence-based guidelines. The purpose of this overview is to illustrate the various therapeutic options available for the optimized management of these patients.

METHODS

A Medline search of full-text articles published in English from 1980 to April 2022 was performed. The main analyzed aspects of vasomotor disorders were treatment options. We also performed research on "Clinicaltrial.gov" for ongoing trials.

CONCLUSION

Coronary (micro)vascular spasm and microvascular dysfunction are clinical entities characterized by high prevalence and clinical representation. Several therapeutic strategies, both innovative and established, are available to optimize treatment and improve the quality of life of these patients.

INOCA/ANOCA: Mechanisms and novel treatments

Angina or ischemia with no obstructive coronary disease (ANOCA/INOCA) is a common but under-treated condition due to poorly understood pathophysiologic mechanisms, limited diagnostic tools, and lack of proven targeted therapy. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) occurs when the microvasculature inadequately perfuses the myocardium under stress, or at rest in the case of microvascular spasm resulting in ANOCA/INOCA. Coronary functional angiography (CFA) measures endothelial independent microvascular dysfunction (coronary flow reduction <2.5) in response to adenosine and endothelial dependent microvascular dysfunction (lack of dilation and/or constriction) to acetylcholine testing as well as epicardial and microvascular spasm. Current treatment for coronary microvascular dysfunction is limited to renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors and statins as well as antianginal medications. Novel therapies targeting the underlying pathology are under development and include the coronary sinus reducer, CD34+ stem cell therapy, and novel pharmacologic agents such as sGC stimulators or endothelin-receptor blockers. We review the current understanding of pathophysiology, diagnostic tools, and novel therapies for coronary microvascular dysfunction in ANOCA/INOCA.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction affects left ventricular global longitudinal strain response to dipyridamole stress echocardiography: a pilot study

The aim is to investigate, by means of speckle tracking echocardiography, left ventricular (LV) contractile function at rest and during dipyridamole stress in patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). 59 patients (39% women, mean age 65.6 ± 6.1 years) with history of chest pain and without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent dipyridamole stress echocardiography. Coronary flow was assessed in the left anterior descending coronary artery. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) was determined as the ratio of hyperaemic to baseline diastolic coronary flow velocity. CMD was defined as CFR < 2. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) was measured at rest and at peak dose. Nineteen patients (32%) among the overall population showed CMD. Baseline GLS was significantly lower in patients with CMD (- 16.8 ± 2.7 vs. - 19.1 ± 3.1, p < 0.01). A different contractile response to dipyridamole infusion was observed between the two groups: GLS significantly increased up to peak dose in patients without CMD (from - 19.1 ± 3.1 to - 20.2 ± 3.1, p < 0.01), and significantly decreased in patients with CMD (from - 16.8 ± 2.7 to - 15.8 ± 2.7, p < 0.01). There was a significant inverse correlation between CFR and ∆GLS (r = - 0.82, p < 0.01). Rest GLS and GLS response to dipyridamole stress are markedly impaired among patients with chest pain syndrome, non-obstructive CAD and CMD, reflecting subclinical LV systolic dysfunction and lack of LV contractile reserve due to underlying myocardial ischemia.

Effects of ranolazine on various outcomes in patients with stable angina: an updated meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We determined the effect of ranolazine vs. placebo in angina patients on 1) selective measures of the ischemic burden, 2) cardiovascular outcomes, including atrial fibrillation incidence, 3) the in-treatment glycohemoglobin levels and the permanent discontinuations because of side effects, and 4) the achieved between-arms blood pressure and heart rate difference.

METHODS

PubMed and Cochrane Collaboration Library databases were searched for eligible trials until end of September 2020. Trial quality was assessed by the Rob2 tool. Risk ratios or achieved mean differences during follow-up and 95% confidence interval (CI) of categorical or continuous outcomes, respectively, were calculated (random-effects model). The relationship between discontinuation rates and ranolazine's mean dose was investigated by meta-regression analysis.

RESULTS

We selected 18 trials (n = 12,995 patients in patients with macro or microvascular coronary heart disease. Achieved blood pressure and heart rate at rest were not different between randomized arms. Ranolazine administration compared to placebo was associated with an increase of 1) total exercise duration by 30 seconds (95% CI, 18-42), 2) time to 1 mm ST-segment depression by 44 seconds (95% CI, 30-54), and 3) time to angina onset by 40 seconds (95% CI, 30-54). On average, the incidence of atrial fibrillation was reduced by 25% following ranolazine treatment compared to placebo, while glycohemoglobin showed a mean decrease of 0.4% (95% CI, 0.3-0.5%).

DISCUSSION

Ranolazine remains an effective anti-ischemic drug, increases the angina-free exercise duration, delays the onset of ST-segment depression. The beneficial effects of ranolazine are extended to atrial fibrillation reduction rates and better glycemic control.

Stereoselective quantitative analysis of ranolazine in plasma and tissue samples: application in pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution studies

This study aimed to develop a rapid and sensitive reversed-phase mode high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization coupled with a tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous determination of ranolazine enantiomers in rat plasma and tissues.

Ranolazine: a better understanding of pathophysiology and patient profile to guide treatment of chronic stable angina

Chronic stable angina pectoris, the most prevalent symptomatic manifestation of coronary artery disease, greatly impairs quality of life and is associated with an increased risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Better understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of myocardial ischemia permitted new therapeutic strategies to optimize the management of angina patients. Ideally, antianginal drug treatment should be tailored to individual patient's profile and chosen according to the pathophysiology, hemodynamic profile, adverse effects, potential drug interactions and comorbidities. In this respect, and because of its peculiar mechanism of action, ranolazine represents an alternative therapeutic approach in patients with chronic stable angina and may be considered the first choice in presence of comorbidities that difficult the use of traditional therapies.

Doppler Echocardiography Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Function in Patients With Angina and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Echocardiographic evaluation is an essential part of the diagnostic work-up in patients with known or suspected cardiovascular disease. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTDE) enables straightforward and reliable visualization of flow in the left anterior descending artery. In the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease, low TTDE-derived coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) is considered a marker of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). TTDE CFVR is free from ionizing radiation and widely available, utilizing high-frequency transducers, pharmacologic vasodilator stress, and pulsed-wave Doppler quantification of diastolic peak flow velocities. European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend TTDE CFVR evaluation only following preceding anatomic invasive or non-invasive coronary imaging excluding obstructive CAD. Accordingly, clinical use of TTDE CFVR is limited and CMD frequently goes undiagnosed. An evolving body of evidence underlines that low CFVR is an important and robust predictor of adverse prognosis and continuing symptoms in angina patients both with and without obstructive CAD. The majority of angina patients have no obstructive CAD, particularly among women. This has led to the suggestion that there may be a gender-specific female atherosclerotic phenotype with less epicardial obstruction, and a low CFVR signifying CMD instead. Nevertheless, available evidence indicates low CFVR is an equally important prognostic marker in both men and women. In this review, TTDE CFVR was evaluated regarding indication, practical and technical aspects, and interpretation of results. Association with symptoms and prognosis, comparison with alternative invasive and non-invasive imaging modalities, and possible interventions in angina patients with low CFVR were discussed, and key research questions were proposed.

Use of Ranolazine for the Treatment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is defined as a mismatch of myocardial blood supply and oxygen consumption due to a dysfunction of the coronary microvessels. Up to 20-30% of patients with CMD have progressive worsening of symptoms with significant impairment of quality of life. Large-scale randomized studies of the pharmacologic treatment of CMD are lacking. Classic anti-ischemic drugs are the initial form of treatment, but efficacy is often limited. Ranolazine has a unique mechanism of action that does not affect blood pressure or heart rate. When added to existing anti-anginal agents, ranolazine improved at least one domain in eight of ten studies in which a questionnaire was used to assess patient health status. Five studies evaluated coronary arterial flow reserve (CFR), reporting that patients with low values had significant improvement in CFR and suggesting that those with more severe CMD respond more favorably to ranolazine. In two studies, exercise duration and time to myocardial ischemia were significantly increased after treatment with ranolazine. Data are lacking for ranolazine use as the sole agent for CMD treatment. Some questions remain to be answered regarding ranolazine use for CMD. Larger studies of longer duration are needed to verify the effectiveness of ranolazine in the treatment of CMD.

Coronary microvascular disease: current concepts of pathophysiology, diagnosis and management

Coronary microvascular disease (CMD) is present in 30% of patients with angina and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We now have an improved understanding of the pathophysiology of CMD and the invasive and noninvasive tests that can be used to make the diagnosis. Recent studies have shown that management of CMD guided by physiological testing yields better results than empirical treatment. Despite major advances in diagnosing and stratifying this condition, therapeutic strategies remain limited and poorly defined. This review article discusses recent advances in understanding the pathophysiology of CMD, the modalities that are available to diagnose it clinically, current management options and a look at what is in store for the future.

Efficacy of Ranolazine for Treatment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

Background

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a common cause of angina and exercise intolerance in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease. The efficacy of ranolazine, a late sodium channel blocker, in patients with symptomatic obstructive coronary artery disease is well established. To evaluate the efficacy of ranolazine in CMD, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies.

Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and conference abstracts were searched from January 1975 to March 2020. Randomized trials evaluating ranolazine in patients with CMD were screened. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. End points of interest included a change in angina measured by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), coronary flow reserve (CFR), and clinical outcomes. Data were combined using random-effects models.

Results

Of 836 citations, 6 randomized studies (318 patients) were included. Median follow-up was 4 weeks. When pooling the 6 trials analyzing ranolazine, we found that patients treated with ranolazine had a higher SAQ value regarding physical functioning (mean difference, 6.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.41; 10.42) quality of life (10.07; 95% CI, 3.4; 16.74), and angina stability (20.14; 95% CI, 10.12; 30.17), as well as improved CFR (0.27; 95% CI, 0.09; 0.45) compared with placebo/control therapy. A high heterogeneity was observed (range I², 30%-84%).

Conclusions

In CMD, ranolazine may be associated with improvements in CFR and some of the SAQ domains, including angina stability, physical functioning, and quality of life. However, it does not seem to beneficially impact angina frequency and treatment satisfaction. It is also unknown if it improves prognosis of afflicted patients.

Evaluation of non-invasive imaging parameters in coronary microvascular disease: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is an important underlying cause of angina pectoris. Currently, no diagnostic tool is available to directly visualize the coronary microvasculature. Invasive microvascular reactivity testing is the diagnostic standard for CMD, but several non-invasive imaging techniques are being evaluated. However, evidence on reported non-invasive parameters and cut-off values is limited. Thus, we aimed to provide an overview of reported non-invasive parameters and corresponding cut-off values for CMD.

METHODS

Pubmed and EMBASE databases were systematically searched for studies enrolling patients with angina pectoris without obstructed coronary arteries, investigating at least one non-invasive imaging technique to quantify CMD. Methodological quality assessment of included studies was performed using QUADAS-2.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven studies were included. Ten cardiac magnetic resonance studies reported MPRI and nine positron emission tomography (PET) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) studies reported CFR. Mean MPRI ranged from 1.47 ± 0.36 to 2.01 ± 0.41 in patients and from 1.50 ± 0.47 to 2.68 ± 0.49 in controls without CMD. Reported mean CFR in PET and TTE ranged from 1.39 ± 0.31 to 2.85 ± 1.35 and 1.69 ± 0.40 to 2.40 ± 0.40 for patients, and 2.68 ± 0.83 to 4.32 ± 1.78 and 2.65 ± 0.65 to 3.31 ± 1.10 for controls, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review summarized current evidence on reported parameters and cut-off values to diagnose CMD for various non-invasive imaging modalities. In current clinical practice, CMD is generally diagnosed with a CFR less than 2.0. However, due to heterogeneity in methodology and reporting of outcome measures, outcomes could not be compared and no definite reference values could be provided.

Endothelial Dysfunction and Coronary Vasoreactivity - A Review of the History, Physiology, Diagnostic Techniques, and Clinical Relevance

The fervency for advancement and evolution in percutaneous coronary intervention has revolutionised the treatment of coronary artery disease. Historically, the focus of the interventional cardiologist was directed at the restoration of luminal patency of the major epicardial coronary arteries, yet whilst this approach is evolving with much greater utilisation of physiological assessment, it often neglects consideration of the role of the coronary microcirculation, which has been shown to clearly influence prognosis. In this review, we explore the narrative of the coronary circulation as more than just a simple conduit for blood but an organ with functional significance. We review organisation and physiology of the coronary circulation, as well as the current methods and techniques used to examine it. We discuss the studies exploring coronary artery endothelial function, appreciating that coronary artery disease occurs on a spectrum of disorder and that percutaneous coronary intervention has a latent effect on the coronary circulation with long-term consequences. It is concluded that greater recognition of the coronary artery endothelium and mechanisms of the coronary circulation should further guide revascularisation strategies.

Microvascular Assessment of Ranolazine in Non-Obstructive Atherosclerosis: The MARINA Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Pilot Trial

BACKGROUND

Microvascular dysfunction is known to play a key role in patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary artery disease. We investigated the impact of ranolazine among patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary artery disease.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled pilot trial, 26 patients with angina once weekly or more, abnormal stress test, and nonobstructive coronary artery disease (<50% stenosis by angiography and fractional flow reserve >0.80) were randomized 1:1 to ranolazine or placebo for 12 weeks. Primary end point was ΔSeattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) angina frequency score. Baseline and 3 months follow-up SAQ, Duke Activity Status Index scores along with invasive fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve (CFR), hyperemic myocardial resistance, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing measurements were performed.

RESULTS

No significant differences in ΔSAQ angina frequency scores (P=0.53) or Duke Activity Status Index (P=0.76) were observed between ranolazine versus placebo, although patients on ranolazine had lesser improvement in SAQ physical limitation scores (P=0.02) compared with placebo at 3 months. There were no significant differences in ΔCFR or Δhyperemic myocardial resistance between ranolazine and placebo groups. Patients treated with ranolazine, compared with placebo, had no significant improvement in maximum rate of oxygen consumption measured during incremental exercise (VO₂ max) and peak metabolic equivalents of task. Interestingly, in the ranolazine group, patients with baseline CFR<2.0 demonstrated greater gain in CFR compared with those with baseline CFR≥2.0 (P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Ranolazine did not demonstrate improvement in SAQ angina frequency score, invasive microvascular function, or peak metabolic equivalent compared with placebo at 3 months. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02147067.

Ranolazine for Symptomatic Management of Microvascular Angina

BACKGROUND

Ranolazine is approved in the United States and Europe for chronic stable angina. Microvascular angina (MVA) is defined as angina with no obstructive coronary artery disease.

STUDY QUESTION

Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of ranolazine at improving angina scores and quality of life in a Canadian cohort with severe refractory angina due to MVA.

STUDY DESIGN

We administered questionnaires to 31 patients at baseline and after at least 6 weeks of ranolazine treatment.

MEASURES AND OUTCOMES

Validated, clinically significant changes for each Seattle Angina Questionnaire domain and the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form were obtained from the literature. Score changes between baseline and postranolazine use were analyzed using sign test.

RESULTS

Patients were mostly female (27 of 31 patients) with a median age of 57 years. After initiation of ranolazine treatment, patients experienced improvements in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form scores (80.6%; P < 0.01) and in 3 of the 4 domains of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (physical limitation: 73.3%; P = 0.02; treatment satisfaction: 80.6%; P < 0.01; and disease perception: 77.4%; P < 0.01). Patients were less likely to have interactions with the health care system after ranolazine treatment as compared with before (35.5% vs. 93.5%; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Ranolazine significantly improves symptom control and quality of life in patients with MVA and severe refractory angina and reduces their interaction with the health care system. Given the potentially debilitating effect of chronic angina in MVA, ranolazine may be an effective treatment option.

Effects of Oral Drugs on Coronary Microvascular Function in Patients Without Significant Stenosis of Epicardial Coronary Arteries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Coronary Flow Reserve

Objective: This study aims to investigate the impact of cardiovascular medications on the coronary flow reserve (CFR) in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from inception to 15 November 2019. Studies were included if they reported CFR from baseline to follow-up after oral drug therapy of patients without obstructive CAD. Data was pooled using random-effects modeling. The primary outcome was change in CFR from baseline to follow-up after oral drug therapy.

Results: A total of 46 studies including 845 subjects were included in this study. Relative to baseline, the CFR was improved by angiotensin-converting enzymes (ACEIs), aldosterone receptor antagonists (ARBs) [standard mean difference (SMD): 1.12; 95% CI: 0.77–1.47], and statins treatments (SMD: 0.61; 95%CI: 0.36–0.85). Six to 12 months of calcium channel blocker (CCB) treatments improved CFR (SMD: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.51–1.58). Beta-blocker (SMD: 0.24; 95% CI: −0.39–0.88) and ranolazine treatment (SMD: 0.31; 95% CI: −0.39–1.01) were not associated with improved CFR.

Conclusions: Therapy with ACEIs, ARBs, and statins was associated with improved CFR in patients with confirmed or suspicious CMD. CCBs also improved CFR among patients followed for 6–12 months. Beta-blocker and ranolazine had no impact on CFR.

Design and rationale of FLAVOUR: A phase IIa efficacy study of the 5-lipoxygenase activating protein antagonist AZD5718 in patients with recent myocardial infarction

Patients with coronary artery disease remain at increased risk of recurrent life-threatening cardiovascular events even after adequate guideline-based treatment of conventional risk factors, including blood lipid levels. Inflammation is a critical pathway in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and is independently associated with risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. Leukotrienes are potent pro-inflammatory and vasoactive mediators synthesized by leukocytes in atherosclerotic lesions. AZD5718 is a novel antagonist of 5-lipoxygenase activating protein that suppresses leukotriene biosynthesis. FLAVOUR is a phase IIa efficacy and safety study of AZD5718 in patients with myocardial infarction 1-4 weeks before randomization. Stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery after percutaneous intervention must be <50%, and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade must be ≥ 2. Enrolled participants receive standard care plus oral AZD5718 200 mg, 50 mg, or placebo once daily for up to 12 weeks (extended from 4 weeks by protocol amendment). The planned sample size is 100 participants randomized to 12 weeks' treatment. Change in urine leukotriene E4 levels is the primary efficacy outcome. FLAVOUR also aims to evaluate whether AZD5718 can improve coronary microvascular function, as measured by transthoracic colour Doppler-assisted coronary flow velocity reserve. Centrally pretrained study sonographers use standardized protocols and equipment. Additional outcomes include assessment of comprehensive echocardiographic parameters (including coronary flow, global strain, early diastolic strain rate and left ventricular ejection fraction), arterial stiffness, biomarkers, health-related quality of life, and safety. Specific anti-inflammatory therapies may represent novel promising treatments to reduce residual risk in patients with coronary artery disease. By combining primary pharmacodynamic and secondary cardiovascular surrogate efficacy outcomes, FLAVOUR aims to investigate the mechanistic basis and potential benefits of AZD5718 treatment in patients with coronary artery disease.

Treatment strategies in coronary microvascular dysfunction: A systematic review of interventional studies

CMD has been associated with a wide spectrum of diseases and conditions, and it has proven to be a strong prognostic marker of morbidity and mortality. Despite increased attention, guideline-based treatment recommendations are lacking. We performed a systematic review of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions to improve coronary perfusion, assessed by IC Doppler, TTDE, PET, CMRI, transthoracic contrast perfusion echocardiography, and dilution techniques. No restrictions were made regarding the study design (randomized, placebo-controlled/randomized with active comparators/nonrandomized with or without a control group), the cardiac condition studied, or the coronary microvascular function at baseline. An electronic database search yielded 4485 records of which 80 studies met our inclusion criteria. Included studies were sorted according to intervention and study design. Studies were small and heterogeneous in methodology, and only few were placebo-controlled. Although some treatments looked promising, we found that no specific treatment was sufficiently well documented to be recommended in any patient groups. There is a need for larger well-designed clinical trials, and we suggest that future studies stratify study populations according to pathogenic mechanisms, thereby investigating whether an individualized treatment approach would be more successful.

Late sodium channel blockade improves angina and myocardial perfusion in patients with severe coronary microvascular dysfunction: Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation-Coronary Vascular Dysfunction ancillary study

BACKGROUND

In a prior trial of late sodium channel inhibition (ranolazine) among symptomatic subjects without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and limited myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI), we observed no improvement in angina or MPRI, overall. Here we describe the clinical characteristics and myocardial perfusion responses of a pre-defined subgroup who had coronary flow reserve (CFR) assessed invasively.

METHODS

Symptomatic patients without obstructive CAD and limited MPRI in a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial of ranolazine vs. placebo were subjects of this prespecified substudy. Because we had previously observed that adverse outcomes and beneficial treatment responses occurred in those with lower CFR, patients were subgrouped by CFR <2.5 vs ≥2.5. Symptoms were assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire and the SAQ-7, and left-ventricular volume and MPRI were assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Coronary angiograms, CFR, and MRI data were analyzed by core labs masked to treatment and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

During qualifying coronary angiography, 81 patients (mean age 55 years, 98% women) had invasively determined CFR 2.69 ± 0.65 (mean ± SD; range 1.4-5.5); 43% (n = 35) had CFR <2.5. Demographic and symptomatic findings did not differ comparing CFR subgroups. Those with low CFR had improved angina (p = 0.04) and midventricular MPRI (p = 0.03) with ranolazine vs placebo. Among patients with low CFR, reduced left-ventricular end-diastolic volume predicted a beneficial angina response.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptomatic patients with CFR <2.5 and no obstructive CAD had improved angina and myocardial perfusion with ranolazine, supporting the hypothesis that the late sodium channel is important in management of coronary microvascular dysfunction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT01342029.

Pharmacologic Treatment of Patients With Myocardial Ischemia With No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Half of women and 1/3 of men with angina and ischemia on stress testing have ischemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA). These patients have quality of life (QoL) impairment comparable with patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. Clinicians generally treat INOCA with traditional antianginal agents despite previous studies demonstrating variable response to these medications. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of available pharmacologic therapies for INOCA. We systematically searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform in July 2017 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating pharmacologic agents for INOCA. The primary outcome of interest was QoL. Secondary outcomes included subjective and objective efficacy measures and safety outcomes. We included 35 RCTs from 333 identified studies. Interventions that improved QoL with moderate-quality evidence included angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (±statin) and ranolazine. Low-to-very-low-quality evidence also suggests that ACE inhibitors, β blockers, calcium-channel blockers, nicorandil, ranolazine, and statins may decrease angina frequency and delay ischemia on stress testing. Other interventions, most notably nitrates, did not significantly improve any outcome. In conclusion, evidence for pharmacologic treatment of INOCA is generally poor, and higher-quality RCTs using a standardized definition of INOCA are needed. Moderate-quality evidence suggests that ACE inhibitors and ranolazine improve QoL. Other interventions had low-quality evidence or no evidence of efficacy.

A practical clinical approach to utilize cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the evaluation and management of coronary artery disease: a primer for cardiologists

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is growing clinical interest for the use of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to evaluate patients with or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). With mounting evidence, this concise review with relevant teaching cases helps to illustrate how to integrate CPET data into real world patient care.

RECENT FINDINGS

CPET provides a novel and purely physiological basis to identify cardiac dysfunction in symptomatic patients with both obstructive-CAD and nonobstructive-CAD (NO-CAD). In many cases, abnormal cardiac response on CPET may be the only objective evidence of potentially undertreated ischemic heart disease. When symptomatic patients have NO-CAD on coronary angiogram, they are still at increased risk for cardiovascular events. This problem appears to be more common in women than men and may warrant more aggressive risk factor modification. As the main intervention is lifestyle (diet, smoking cessation, exercise) and medical therapy (statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers), serial CPET testing enables close surveillance of cardiovascular function and is responsive to clinical status.

SUMMARY

CPET can enhance outpatient evaluation and management of CAD. Diagnostically, it can help to identify physiologically significant obstructive-CAD and NO-CAD in patients with normal routine cardiac testing. CPET may be of particular value in symptomatic women with NO-CAD. Prognostically, precise quantification of improvements in exercise capacity may help to improve long-term lifestyle and medication adherence for this chronic condition.

Trimetazidine and Other Metabolic Modifiers

Treatment goals for people with chronic angina should focus on the relief of symptoms and improving mortality rates so the patient can feel better and live longer. The traditional haemodynamic approach to ischaemic heart disease was based on the assumption that increasing oxygen supply and decreasing oxygen demand would improve symptoms. However, data from clinical trials, show that about one third of people continue to have angina despite a successful percutaneous coronary intervention and medical therapy. Moreover, several trials on chronic stable angina therapy and revascularisation have failed to show benefits in terms of primary outcome (survival, cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality), symptom relief or echocardiographic parameters. Failure to significantly improve quality of life and prognosis may be attributed in part to a limited understanding of ischaemic heart disease, by neglecting the fact that ischaemia is a metabolic disorder. Shifting cardiac metabolism from free fatty acids towards glucose is a promising approach for the treatment of patients with stable angina, independent of the underlying disease (macrovascular and/or microvascular disease). Cardiac metabolic modulators open the way to a greater understanding of ischaemic heart disease and its common clinical manifestations as an energetic disorder rather than an imbalance between the demand and supply of oxygen and metabolites.

Daily Activity Measured With Wearable Technology as a Novel Measurement of Treatment Effect in Patients With Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: Substudy of a Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial

BACKGROUND

Digital wearable devices provide a "real-world" assessment of physical activity and quantify intervention-related changes in clinical trials. However, the value of digital wearable device-recorded physical activity as a clinical trial outcome is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

Because late sodium channel inhibition (ranolazine) improves stress laboratory exercise duration among angina patients, we proposed that this benefit could be quantified and translated during daily life by measuring digital wearable device-determined step count in a clinical trial.

METHODS

We conducted a substudy in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of participants with angina and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) with no obstructive coronary artery disease to evaluate the value of digital wearable device monitoring. Ranolazine or placebo were administered (500-1000 mg twice a day) for 2 weeks with a subsequent 2-week washout followed by crossover to ranolazine or placebo (500-1000 mg twice a day) for an additional 2 weeks. The outcome of interest was within-subject difference in Fitbit Flex daily step count during week 2 of ranolazine versus placebo during each treatment period. Secondary outcomes included within-subject differences in angina, quality of life, myocardial perfusion reserve, and diastolic function.

RESULTS

A total of 43 participants were enrolled in the substudy and 30 successfully completed the substudy for analysis. Overall, late sodium channel inhibition reduced within-subject daily step count versus placebo (mean 5757 [SD 3076] vs mean 6593 [SD 339], P=.01) but did not improve angina (Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7 [SAQ-7]) (P=.83). Among the subgroup with improved angina (SAQ-7), a direct correlation with increased step count (r=.42, P=.02) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

We report one of the first studies to use digital wearable device-determined step count as an outcome variable in a placebo-controlled crossover trial of late sodium channel inhibition in participants with CMD. Our substudy demonstrates that late sodium channel inhibition was associated with a decreased step count overall, although the subgroup with angina improvement had a step count increase. Our findings suggest digital wearable device technology may provide new insights in clinical trial research.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01342029; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01342029 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6uyd6B2PO).

Ranolazine reduces repolarization heterogeneity in symptomatic patients with diabetes and non-flow-limiting coronary artery stenosis

BACKGROUND

Experimental evidence suggests that ranolazine decreases susceptibility to ischemia-induced arrhythmias independent of effects on coronary artery blood flow.

OBJECTIVE

In symptomatic diabetic patients with non-flow-limiting coronary artery stenosis with diffuse atherosclerosis and/or microvascular dysfunction, we explored whether ranolazine reduces T-wave heterogeneity (TWH), an electrocardiographic (ECG) marker of arrhythmogenic repolarization abnormalities shown to predict sudden cardiac death.

METHODS

We studied all 16 patients with analyzable ECG recordings during rest and exercise tolerance testing before and after 4 weeks of ranolazine in the double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled RAND-CFR trial (NCT01754259). TWH was quantified without knowledge of treatment assignment by second central moment analysis, which assesses the interlead splay of T waves in precordial leads about a mean waveform. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) was measured by positron emission tomography.

RESULTS

At baseline, prior to randomization, TWH during rest was 54 ± 7 μV and was not altered following placebo (47 ± 6 μV, p = .47) but was reduced by 28% (to 39 ± 5 μV, p = .002) after ranolazine. Ranolazine did not increase MBF at rest. Exercise increased TWH after placebo by 49% (to 70 ± 8 μV, p = .03). Ranolazine did not reduce TWH during exercise (to 75 ± 16 μV), and there were no differences among the groups (p = .95, ANOVA). TWH was not correlated with MBF at rest before (r²  = .07, p = .36) or after ranolazine (r²  = .23, p = .06).

CONCLUSIONS

In symptomatic diabetic patients with non-flow-limiting coronary artery stenosis with diffuse atherosclerosis and/or microvascular dysfunction, ranolazine reduced TWH at rest but not during exercise. Reduction in repolarization abnormalities appears to be independent of alterations in MBF.

Ranolazine in Symptomatic Diabetic Patients Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Impact on Microvascular and Diastolic Function

Background

Treatments for patients with myocardial ischemia in the absence of angiographic obstructive coronary artery disease are limited. In these patients, particularly those with diabetes mellitus, diffuse coronary atherosclerosis and microvascular dysfunction is a common phenotype and may be accompanied by diastolic dysfunction. Our primary aim was to determine whether ranolazine would quantitatively improve exercise‐stimulated myocardial blood flow and cardiac function in symptomatic diabetic patients without obstructive coronary artery disease.

Methods and Results

We conducted a double‐blinded crossover trial with 1:1 random allocation to the order of ranolazine and placebo. At baseline and after each 4‐week treatment arm, left ventricular myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve (CFR; primary end point) were measured at rest and after supine bicycle exercise using ¹³N‐ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography. Resting echocardiography was also performed. Multilevel mixed‐effects linear regression was used to determine treatment effects. Thirty‐five patients met criteria for inclusion. Ranolazine did not significantly alter rest or postexercise left ventricular myocardial blood flow or CFR. However, patients with lower baseline CFR were more likely to experience improvement in CFR with ranolazine (r=−0.401, P=0.02) than with placebo (r=−0.188, P=0.28). In addition, ranolazine was associated with an improvement in E/septal e′ (P=0.001) and E/lateral e′ (P=0.01).

Conclusions

In symptomatic diabetic patients without obstructive coronary artery disease, ranolazine did not change exercise‐stimulated myocardial blood flow or CFR but did modestly improve diastolic function. Patients with more severe baseline impairment in CFR may derive more benefit from ranolazine.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01754259.

Impact of ranolazine on coronary microvascular dysfunction (MICRO) study

BACKGROUND

Patients with angina and coronary microvascular dysfunction, without evidence of structural or epicardial coronary disease (Type I CMVD) remain without evidence based treatment options. Previous work has demonstrated that ranolazine can improve angina frequency and stability among patients with Type 1 CMVD; however, the mechanism remains unclear. Therefore, the objective of this pilot project was to assess the impact of ranolazine on Type I CMVD as measured using an invasive tool to measure global resistance (index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR)).

METHODS

Patients with Type 1 CMVD diagnosed using IMR were enrolled and treated with ranolazine 1000mg BID. Coronary angiography and IMR were performed at baseline and on treatment after four weeks. The primary outcome measure was change in IMR pre- and post-treatment. Secondary outcome measures, improvement in angina and activity level, were assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and Metabolic equivalent for Task (MET) scores.

RESULTS

A total of 7 patient were enrolled and completed the study. Mean age was 57.6±7.5, 43% were female and 43% were Hispanic. Mean baseline IMR was 37.25±16.27 which decreased to 19.48±5.69 (p=0.02; (-48% Δ) after treatment with ranolazine. Four of the five SAQ domains improved on treatment with significant improvement in physical limitation (p=0.001), angina frequency (p=0.04), angina stability (p=0.05) and disease perception (p=0.001). Non-significant improvements in activity were also seen in both the DASI and MET scores.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with Type 1 CMVD, our pilot data suggest favorable changes in IMR, anginal symptoms and activity status with ranolazine treatment. These findings support further evaluation of the effects of ranolazine on microcirculatory function and angina symptoms in a larger cohort of patients with Type 1 CMVD.

Left atrial volume and function in patients with cardiac syndrome X assessed by real time three-dimensional echocardiography

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate left atrial (LA) volume and function using real time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) in patients with cardiac syndrome X (CSX).

METHODS

Fifty patients with CSX (28 females; mean age 50.9±10.9 years) and 50 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (30 females; mean age 52.3±9.8 years) who had negative treadmill exercise test and normal coronary arteries on invasive coronary angiography were included in the study. Comprehensive two-dimensional (2D), pulsed and tissue Doppler, speckle tracking echocardiography, and RT3DE for the assessment of LA dynamics were performed in all study participants.

RESULTS

Cardiac syndrome X and control groups have similar clinical characteristics regarding age, sex, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, and smoking habit. 2D echocardiographic parameters were also similar between groups. Pulsed- and tissue Doppler parameters, IVRT, A, and A_m values, were higher in CSX group, while E_m , E/A, and E_m /A_m ratios were higher in the control group reflecting mild diastolic dysfunction. Regarding RT3DE parameters, LA maximum volume, minimum volume, volume before atrial contraction, LA maximum volume index, total and active stroke volumes were found to be increased in CSX patients. However, LA total stroke fraction, passive stroke volume, passive stroke fraction, peak systolic, and diastolic longitudinal strains were found to be lower in CSX patients.

CONCLUSION

The main finding of this study was that CSX patients had altered LA booster pump, reservoir, and conduit functions. This finding may have clinical implications for early detection of abnormal LA dynamics in CSX patients.

Ranolazine for stable angina pectoris

BACKGROUND

Stable angina pectoris is a chronic medical condition with significant impact on mortality and quality of life; it can be macrovascular or microvascular in origin. Ranolazine is a second-line anti-anginal drug approved for use in people with stable angina. However, the effects of ranolazine for people with angina are considered to be modest, with uncertain clinical relevance.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of ranolazine on cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, quality of life, acute myocardial infarction incidence, angina episodes frequency and adverse events incidence in stable angina patients, used either as monotherapy or as add-on therapy, and compared to placebo or any other anti-anginal agent.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and the Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science in February 2016, as well as regional databases and trials registers. We also screened reference lists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which directly compared the effects of ranolazine versus placebo or other anti-anginals in people with stable angina pectoris were eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Estimates of treatment effects were calculated using risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD) and standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a fixed-effect model. Where we found statistically significant heterogeneity (Chi² P < 0.10), we used a random-effects model for pooling estimates. Meta-analysis was not performed where we found considerable heterogeneity (I² ≥ 75%). We used GRADE criteria to assess evidence quality and the GRADE profiler (GRADEpro GDT) to import data from Review Manager 5.3 to create 'Summary of findings' tables.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 17 RCTs (9975 participants, mean age 63.3 years). We found very limited (or no) data to inform most planned comparisons. Summary data were used to inform comparison of ranolazine versus placebo. Overall, risk of bias was assessed as unclear.For add-on ranolazine compared to placebo, no data were available to estimate cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality. We found uncertainty about the effect of ranolazine on: all-cause mortality (1000 mg twice daily, RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.26 to 2.71; 3 studies, 2053 participants; low quality evidence); quality of life (any dose, SMD 0.25, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.52; 4 studies, 1563 participants; I² = 73%; moderate quality evidence); and incidence of non-fatal acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (1000mg twice daily, RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.07; 2 studies, 1509 participants; low quality evidence). Add-on ranolazine 1000 mg twice daily reduced the fervour of angina episodes (MD -0.66, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.35; 3 studies, 2004 participants; I² = 39%; moderate quality evidence) but increased the risk of non-serious adverse events (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.40; 3 studies, 2053 participants; moderate quality evidence).For ranolazine as monotherapy compared to placebo, we found uncertain effect on cardiovascular mortality (1000 mg twice daily, RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.88; 1 study, 2604 participants; low quality evidence). No data were available to estimate non-cardiovascular mortality. We also found an uncertain effect on all-cause mortality for ranolazine (1000 mg twice daily, RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.25; 3 studies, 6249 participants; low quality evidence), quality of life (1000 mg twice daily, MD 0.28, 95% CI -1.57 to 2.13; 3 studies, 2254 participants; moderate quality evidence), non-fatal AMI incidence (any dose, RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.12; 3 studies, 2983 participants; I² = 50%; low quality evidence), and frequency of angina episodes (any dose, MD 0.08, 95% CI -0.85 to 1.01; 2 studies, 402 participants; low quality evidence). We found an increased risk for non-serious adverse events associated with ranolazine (any dose, RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.00; 3 studies, 947 participants; very low quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found very low quality evidence showing that people with stable angina who received ranolazine as monotherapy had increased risk of presenting non-serious adverse events compared to those given placebo. We found low quality evidence indicating that people with stable angina who received ranolazine showed uncertain effect on the risk of cardiovascular death (for ranolazine given as monotherapy), all-cause death and non-fatal AMI, and the frequency of angina episodes (for ranolazine given as monotherapy) compared to those given placebo. Moderate quality evidence indicated that people with stable angina who received ranolazine showed uncertain effect on quality of life compared with people who received placebo. Moderate quality evidence also indicated that people with stable angina who received ranolazine as add-on therapy had fewer angina episodes but increased risk of presenting non-serious adverse events compared to those given placebo.

Ranolazine and Microvascular Angina by PET in the Emergency Department: Results From a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a common but underdiagnosed cause of chest pain. Literature is scant regarding effective treatments. We explored the effect of ranolazine on coronary flow reserve (CFR) among symptomatic patients with CMD.

METHODS

This pilot double-blinded randomized controlled trial included emergency department patients with chest pain and CMD admitted to an observation unit between June 2014 and November 2015. Participants were assessed by cardiac Rb-82 positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging at baseline and 30 days. CMD was defined as CFR <2 corrected for rate pressure product or <2.5 uncorrected, with no evidence of obstructive or nonobstructive coronary artery disease or calcification. Patients with infarction, hypertensive urgency, heart failure, or prescribed QTc-prolonging drugs were excluded. Participants were assigned to ranolazine or placebo in a 2:1 ratio. Primary outcome was change in CFR at 30 days.

FINDINGS

We enrolled 31 patients (71% female, mean [SD] age 50 [6] years) with CMD (mean [SD] corrected CFR 1.6 [0.3]). Ranolazine improved CFR at 30 days by 17% (P = 0.005) compared with 0% with placebo (P = 0.67). However, there was no significant difference in the primary outcome as measured by mean change in CFR (0.27 ranolazine compared with 0.06 placebo; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.62).

IMPLICATIONS

The emergency department offers a unique venue to diagnose CMD with acute symptoms. In an exploratory randomized controlled trial of symptomatic patients with CMD and no coronary artery disease, promising results were seem with ranolazine and CFR improving at 30 days. Large robust clinical trials are needed to verify improvement of CMD in a sex-specific model. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02052011.

Hypertension, Left Ventricular Hypertrophy, and Myocardial Ischemia

The risks associated with hypertension emerge through a series of complex interactions. Myocardial ischemia is the major contributor to this risk. The mechanisms driving ischemia reflect many of the key factors in hypertension, including endothelial and neurohumoral factors, fibrosis, and hemodynamics. Left ventricular hypertrophy and fibrosis are of fundamental importance and together with hemodynamics provide an optimal template for myocardial ischemia. Understanding the pathophysiology has aided a more rational management approach but challenges remain which, if surmounted, will have an impact on the morbidity and mortality caused by myocardial ischemia in patients with hypertension.

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of late Na current inhibition (ranolazine) in coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD): impact on angina and myocardial perfusion reserve

Aims

The mechanistic basis of the symptoms and signs of myocardial ischaemia in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and evidence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is unclear. The aim of this study was to mechanistically test short-term late sodium current inhibition (ranolazine) in such subjects on angina, myocardial perfusion reserve index, and diastolic filling.

Materials and results

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, mechanistic trial in subjects with evidence of CMD [invasive coronary reactivity testing or non-invasive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI)]. Short-term oral ranolazine 500–1000 mg twice daily for 2 weeks vs. placebo. Angina measured by Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and SAQ-7 (co-primaries), diary angina (secondary), stress MPRI, diastolic filling, quality of life (QoL). Of 128 (96% women) subjects, no treatment differences in the outcomes were observed. Peak heart rate was lower during pharmacological stress during ranolazine (−3.55 b.p.m., P < 0.001). The change in SAQ-7 directly correlated with the change in MPRI (correlation 0.25, P = 0.005). The change in MPRI predicted the change in SAQ QoL, adjusted for body mass index (BMI), prior myocardial infarction, and site (P = 0.0032). Low coronary flow reserve (CFR <2.5) subjects improved MPRI (P < 0.0137), SAQ angina frequency (P = 0.027), and SAQ-7 (P = 0.041).

Conclusions

In this mechanistic trial among symptomatic subjects, no obstructive CAD, short-term late sodium current inhibition was not generally effective for SAQ angina. Angina and myocardial perfusion reserve changes were related, supporting the notion that strategies to improve ischaemia should be tested in these subjects.

Trial registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01342029.

Ranolazine: Drug overview and possible role in primary microvascular angina management

Ranolazine is a novel well-tolerated anti-ischemic drug, which selectively inhibits late sodium current and exerts metabolic properties without any hemodynamic effect. Ranolazine has been approved as a second-line medical treatment for symptomatic stable coronary artery disease. Primary microvascular angina (MVA) is suspected when angina symptoms occur in patients with demonstrated myocardial ischemia, absence of myocardial disease and normal coronary artery angiography. Recent clinical data suggest that MVA represents a complex entity, which has been increasingly recognized as a significant cause of morbidity. High variability and low response to traditional anti-anginal treatment characterize primary MVA. Despite the fact that clinical and preclinical evidence provides information regarding ranolazine usefulness in primary MVA management, only three recent small randomized trials have investigated this issue. By selecting peer-reviewed literature in Pubmed and Cochrane Library, this review provides an overview on ranolazine pharmacology and efficacy, focusing on recent evidence suggesting its usefulness in management of primary MVA.

Current Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies in Microvascular Angina

Microvascular angina is common among patients with signs and symptoms of acute coronary syndrome and is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Unfortunately, microvascular is often under-recognized in clinical settings. The diagnosis of microvascular angina relies on assessment of the functional status of the coronary microvasculature. Invasive strategies include acetylcholine provocation, intracoronary Doppler ultrasound, and intracoronary thermodilution; noninvasive strategies include cardiac positron emission tomography (PET), cardiac magnetic resonance, and Doppler echocardiography. Once the diagnosis of microvascular angina is established, treatment is focused on improving symptoms and reducing future risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Pharmacologic options and lifestyle modifications for patients with microvascular angina are similar to those for patients with coronary artery disease.