Association between left atrial stiffness and aortic plaque thickness in hypertensive patients with stroke

Imaging Biomarkers and Prevalence of Complex Aortic Plaque in Cryptogenic Stroke: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Complex aortic plaque (CAP) is a potential embolic source in patients with cryptogenic stroke (CS). We review CAP imaging criteria for transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), computed tomography angiography (CTA), and magnetic resonance imaging and calculate CAP prevalence in patients with acute CS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched up to December 2022 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. Two independent reviewers extracted data on study design, imaging techniques, CAP criteria, and prevalence. The Cochrane Collaboration tool and Guideline for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies were used to assess risk of bias and reporting completeness, respectively. From 2293 studies, 45 were reviewed for CAP imaging biomarker criteria in patients with acute CS (N=37 TEE; N=9 CTA; N=6 magnetic resonance imaging). Most studies (74%) used ≥4 mm plaque thickness as the imaging criterion for CAP although ≥1 mm (N=1, CTA), ≥5 mm (N=5, TEE), and ≥6 mm (N=2, CTA) were also reported. Additional features included mobility, ulceration, thrombus, protrusions, and assessment of plaque composition. From 23 prospective studies, CAP was detected in 960 of 2778 patients with CS (0.32 [95% CI, 0.24-0.41], I2=94%). By modality, prevalence estimates were 0.29 (95% CI, 0.20-0.40; I2=95%) for TEE; 0.23 (95% CI, 0.15-0.34; I2=87%) for CTA and 0.22 (95% CI, 0.06-0.54; I2=92%) for magnetic resonance imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

TEE was commonly used to assess CAP in patients with CS. The most common CAP imaging biomarker was ≥4 mm plaque thickness. CAP was observed in one-third of patients with acute CS. However, high study heterogeneity suggests a need for reproducible imaging methods.

Impaired left atrial stiffness in patients with corrected congenital left ventricular outflow obstructions

OBJECTIVE

We examined the left atrial stiffness index (LA Stiff) on echocardiography and its determinants in adults and adolescents with repaired congenital left ventricular outflow obstructions (c-LVOOs), including isolated subaortic stenosis (SAS), stenotic bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), and aortic coarctation (CoA).

METHODS

Seventy-two patients (43 males, age: 31 ± 15 years) with repaired c-LVOOs (SAS: n = 12; BAV: n = 27; CoA: n = 33) were compared to 72 age- and sex-matched controls. 2D strain imaging was performed to assess left ventricular (LV) and LA function, including peak positive longitudinal LA strain (LAS), late diastolic LA strain (LDS), and LV global longitudinal strain (GLS). The (E/Ea)/LAS ratio was used to calculate LA Stiff.

RESULTS

LA Stiff was significantly higher in the c-LVOO group than in the control group. Among the c-LVOO patients, the CoA group had the lowest GLS and the highest LA Stiff; no significant differences were found with respect to sex, hypertension history, smoking status, or repeated repair among c-LVOO subtypes. Multivariable regression analysis with the variables "BMI" and "c-LVOO subtype" revealed that BMI and c-LVOO subtypes were independently associated with LA Stiff (b = 0.290, P = .009 and b = 0.353, P = .002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

We documented abnormal LA Stiff values in adults and adolescents after c-LVOO repair. Patients with CoA demonstrated the most impaired LA Stiff values. Overweight may contribute to worse LA Stiff values. Further studies are required to determine the prognostic implications of LA Stiff in patients with repaired c-LVOOs.