High-definition blood flow imaging in the assessment of left ventricular function: Initial experience and comparison with contrast echocardiography

Fetal Aortic Blood Flow Velocity and Power Doppler Profiles in the First Trimester: A Comprehensive Study Using High-Definition Flow Imaging

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to establish reference values for fetal aortic isthmus blood flow velocity and associated indices during the first trimester, utilizing a novel ultrasonographic technique known as high-definition flow imaging (HDFI). Additionally, the correlation between Doppler profiles of aortic blood flow and key fetal parameters, including nuchal thickness (NT), crown-rump length (CRL), and fetal heartbeat (FHB), was investigated.

METHODS

A total of 262 fetuses were included in the analysis between December 2022 and December 2023. Utilizing 2D power Doppler ultrasound images, aortic blood flow parameters were assessed, including aortic peak systolic velocity (PS), aortic end-diastolic velocity (ED), aortic time average maximal velocity (TAMV), and various indices such as aortic systolic velocity/diastolic velocity (S/D), aortic pulsatile index (PI), aortic resistance index (RI), aortic isthmus flow velocity index (IFI), and aortic isthmic systolic index (ISI). Concurrently, fetal FHB, NT, and CRL were evaluated during early trimester Down syndrome screening.

RESULTS

Significant findings include a positive correlation between gestational age (GA) and PS (PS = 3.75 × (GA) - 15.4, r2 = 0.13, p < 0.01), ED (ED = 0.42 × (GA) - 0.61, r2 = 0.04, p < 0.01), PI (PI = 0.07 × (GA) + 1.03, r2 = 0.04, p < 0.01), and TAMV (TAMV = 1.23 × (GA) - 1.66, r2 = 0.08, p < 0.01). In contrast, aortic ISI demonstrated a significant decrease (ISI = -0.03 × (GA) + 0.57, r2 = 0.05, p < 0.05) with gestational age. No significant correlation was observed for aortic RI (p = 0.33), S/D (p = 0.39), and IFI (p = 0.29) with gestational age. Aortic PS exhibited positive correlations with NT (0.217, p = 0.001) and CRL (0.360, p = 0.000) but a negative correlation with FHB (-0.214, p = 0.001). Aortic PI demonstrated positive correlations with CRL (0.208, p = 0.001) and negative correlations with FHB (-0.176, p = 0.005). Aortic TAMV showed positive correlations with NT (0.233, p = 0.000) and CRL (0.290, p = 0.000) while exhibiting a negative correlation with FHB (-0.141, p = 0.026). Aortic ISI demonstrated negative correlations with NT (-0.128, p = 0.045) and CRL (-0.218, p = 0.001) but a positive correlation with FHB (0.163, p = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

Power Doppler angiography with Doppler ultrasound demonstrates the ability to establish accurate reference values for fetal aortic blood flow during the first trimester of pregnancy. Notably, aortic PS, TAMV, and ISI exhibit significant correlations with NT, CRL, and FHB, with ISI appearing more relevant than IFI, PS, TAMV, and FHB. The utilization of HDFI technology proves advantageous in efficiently detecting the site of the aortic isthmus compared to traditional color Doppler mode in early second trimesters.

High-definition blood flow imaging improves quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction

AIMS

The accuracy and reproducibility of echocardiography to quantify left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is limited due to image quality. High-definition blood flow imaging is a new technique which improves cavity delineation without the need for medication or intravenous access. We sought to examine the impact of high-definition blood flow imaging on accuracy and reproducibility of LV systolic function assessment.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Prospective observational study of consecutive patients undergoing 2D and 3D transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), high-definition blood flow imaging, and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) within 1 h of each other. Left ventricular systolic function characterized by left ventricular end-systolic volumes and left ventricular end-diastolic volumes and LVEF were measured. Seventy-six patients were included. Correlation of 2D TTE with CMR was modest (r = 0.68) with a worse correlation in patients with three or more segments not visualized (r = 0.58). High-definition blood flow imaging was feasible in all patients, and the correlation of LVEF with CMR was excellent (r = 0.88). The differences between 2D, high-definition blood flow, and 3D TTE compared to CMR were 5 ± 9%, 2 ± 5%, and 1 ± 3%, respectively. The proportion of patients where the grade of LV function was correctly classified improved from 72.3% using 2D TTE to 92.8% using high-definition blood flow imaging. 3D TTE also had excellent correlation with CMR (r = 0.97) however was only feasible in 72.4% of patients.

CONCLUSION

High-definition blood flow imaging is highly feasible and significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy and grading of LV function compared to 2D echocardiography.

Validation of Echodynamography in Comparison with Particle-image Velocimetry

Echodynamography (EDG) is a computational method to estimate and visualize two-dimensional flow velocity vectors by applying dynamic flow theories to color Doppler echocardiography. The EDG method must be validated if applied to human cardiac flow function. However, a few studies of flow estimated have compared by EDG to the flow data were acquired by other methods. In this study, EDG was validated by comparing the analysis of estimating and visualizing flow velocity vectors obtained by original particle image velocimetry (PIV) based on a left ventricular (LV) phantom hydrogel (in vitro studies) and by EDG based on the virtual Doppler velocity. Velocity measured by PIV method and velocity estimated by EDG method in the perpendicular direction and the radial direction were compared. Regression analysis for the velocity estimated in the radial direction revealed an excellent correlation (R2=0.99, slope = 0.96) and moderate correlation in the perpendicular direction (R2=0.44, slope = 0.46). As revealed by the Bland-Altman plot, however, overestimations and higher relative error were observed in the perpendicular direction (0.51 ± 2.75 mm/s) and in the radial direction (-2.15 ± 21.13 mm/s). The percentage error of the norm-wise relative error of the velocity discrepancy is less than 10%, and velocity magnitude followed the same trends and are of comparable magnitude. These findings indicate that good estimates of velocity can be obtained by the EDG method. Therefore, the EDG method was appropriate for estimating and visualizing velocity vectors in clinical studies for higher measurement accuracy and reliability. The clinical in vivo application showed that the EDG method has the ability to visualize blood flow velocity vectors and differentiate the clinical information of vortex parameters both in normal and abnormal LV subjects. In conclusion, the EDG method has potentially greater clinical acceptance as a tool assessment of LV during the cardiac cycle.