Hemodynamic principles of prosthetic aortic valve evaluation in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement era

Impact of right ventricular and pulmonary vascular characteristics on Impella hemodynamic support in biventricular heart failure: A simulation study

BACKGROUND

Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) is a percutaneous ventricular assist device commonly used in cardiogenic shock, providing robust hemodynamic support, improving the systemic circulation, and relieving pulmonary congestion. Maintaining adequate left ventricular (LV) filling is essential for optimal hemodynamic support by Impella. This study aimed to investigate the impact of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and right ventricular (RV) function on Impella-supported hemodynamics in severe biventricular failure using cardiovascular simulation.

METHODS

We used Simulink® (Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA) for the simulation, incorporating pump performance of Impella CP determined using a mock circulatory loop. Both systemic and pulmonary circulation were modeled using a 5-element resistance-capacitance network. The four cardiac chambers were represented by time-varying elastance with unidirectional valves. In the scenario of severe LV dysfunction (LV end-systolic elastance set at a low level of 0.4 mmHg/mL), we compared the changes in right (RAP) and left atrial pressures (LAP), total systemic flow, and pressure-volume loop relationship at varying degrees of RV function, PVR, and Impella flow rate.

RESULTS

The simulation results showed that under low PVR conditions, an increase in Impella flow rate slightly reduced RAP and LAP and increased total systemic flow, regardless of RV function. Under moderate RV dysfunction and high PVR conditions, an increase in Impella flow rate elevated RAP and excessively reduced LAP to induce LV suction, which limited the increase in total systemic flow.

CONCLUSIONS

PVR is the primary determinant of stable and effective Impella hemodynamic support in patients with severe biventricular failure.

Echocardiographic Versus Invasive Aortic Valve Gradients in Different Clinical Scenarios

BACKGROUND

The role of echocardiography in deriving transvalvular mean gradients from transaortic velocities in aortic stenosis (AS) and in structural valve degeneration (SVD) is well established. However, reports following surgical aortic valve replacement, post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and valve-in-valve-TAVR (ViV-TAVR) have cautioned against the use of echocardiography-derived mean gradients to assess normal functioning bioprosthesis due to discrepancy compared with invasive measures in a phenomenon called discordance.

METHODS

In a multicenter study, intraprocedural echocardiographic and invasive mean gradients in AS, SVD, post-native TAVR, and post-ViV-TAVR were compared, when obtained concomitantly, and discharge echocardiographic gradients were recorded. Absolute discordance (intraprocedural echocardiographic - invasive mean gradient) and percent discordance (intraprocedural echocardiographic - invasive mean gradient/echocardiographic mean gradient) were calculated. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine variables independently associated with elevated postprocedure invasive gradients ≥20 mm Hg, absolute discordance >10 mm Hg, and discharge echocardiographic mean gradient ≥20 mm Hg.

RESULTS

A total of 5,027 patients were included in the registry: 4,725 native TAVR and 302 ViV-TAVR. Intraprocedural concomitant echocardiographic and invasive mean gradients were obtained pre-TAVR in AS (n = 2,418), pre-ViV-TAVR in SVD (n = 101), in post-ViV-TAVR (n = 77), and in post-TAVR (n = 823). Echocardiographic and invasive mean gradients demonstrated strong correlation (r = 0.69) and agreement (bias, 0.11; 95% CI, -0.4-0.62) in AS, moderate correlation (r = 0.56) and agreement (bias, 1.08; 95% CI, -2.53 to 4.59) in SVD, moderate correlation (r = 0.61) and weak agreement (bias, 6.47; 95% CI, 5.08-7.85) post-ViV-TAVR, and weak correlation (r = 0.18) and agreement (bias, 3.41; 95% CI, 3.16-3.65) post-TAVR. Absolute discordance occurs primarily in ViV-TVR and is not explained by sinotubular junction size and increases with increasing echocardiographic mean gradient. Percent discordance in AS and SVD (1.3% and 4%, respectively) was lower compared with post-TAVR/ViV-TAVR (66.7% and 100%, respectively). Compared with self-expanding valves, balloon expanding valves were independently associated with elevated discharge echocardiographic but lower invasive mean gradient (odds ratio = 3.411, 95% CI, 1.482-7.852, P = .004; vs odds ratio = 0.308, 95% CI, 0.130-0.731, P = .008, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-TAVR/ViV-TAVR, echocardiography is discordant from invasive mean gradients, and absolute discordance increases with increasing echocardiographic mean gradient and is not explained by sinotubular junction size. Percent discordance is significantly higher post-TAVR/ViV-TAVR than in AS and SVD. Post-TAVR/ViV-TAVR, poor correlation and wide limits of agreement suggest echocardiographic and invasive mean gradients may not be used interchangeably and a high residual echocardiographic mean gradient should be confirmed invasively before considering any additional procedure to "correct" the gradient. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement valve types have variable impact on echocardiographic and invasive mean gradients.

Discrepancy between invasive and echocardiographic transvalvular gradient after TAVI: Insights from the LAPLACE-TAVI registry

BACKGROUND

Echocardiography-based transvalvular mean pressure gradient (ECHO-mPG) used to assess the forward valve function and structural valve deterioration could overestimate the true pressure gradient. This study evaluated the discrepancy between invasive and ECHO-mPG after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with respective valve type and size, its impact on a device success criterion, and predictors of a pressure discrepancy.

METHODS

We analyzed 645 patients registered in a multicenter TAVI registry (balloon-expandable valve [BEV]: 500; self-expandable valve [SEV]: 145). The invasive transvalvular mPG was measured after valve implantation using two Pigtail catheters (CATH-mPG), while the ECHO-mPG was measured within 48 h after TAVI. Pressure recovery (PR) was calculated using the following formula: ECHO-mPG × effective orifice area (EOA)/ascending aortic area (AoA) × (1 - EOA/AoA).

RESULTS

ECHO-mPG was weakly correlated with (r = 0.29, p < 0.0001), and consistently overestimated CATH-mPG in both BEV and SEV, and respective valve sizes. The magnitude of the discrepancy was larger for BEV than SEV (p < 0.001) and smaller valves (p < 0.001). After the correction of PR using the above formula, the pressure discrepancy remained for BEV (p < 0.001) but not SEV (p = 0.10). The proportion of patients with an ECHO-mPG > 20 mmHg decreased from 7.0% to 1.6% after correction (p < 0.0001). Among the baseline and procedural variables, post-procedural ejection fraction, BEV versus SEV, and smaller valves were associated with a larger discrepancy in mPG.

CONCLUSIONS

ECHO-mPG could be overestimated after TAVI, especially in patients with a smaller BEV. A higher ejection fraction, BEV, and smaller valves were predictors of a pressure discrepancy between CATH- and ECHO-mPG.

Comparison of Echocardiographic and Catheter Mean Gradient to Assess Stenosis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Discordance exists between Doppler-derived and left heart catheterization (LHC)-derived mean gradient (MG) in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We compared echocardiographic parameters of prosthetic valve stenosis and LHC-derived MG in new TAVIs. In a retrospective, single-center study, intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE)-derived MG, LHC-derived MG, and acceleration time (AT) were obtained before and after TAVI in 362 patients. Discharge MG, AT, and Doppler velocity index (DVI) using transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) were also obtained. MG ≥10 mm Hg was defined as abnormal. During native valve assessment with pre-TAVI TEE and pre-TAVI LHC, Pearson correlation coefficient revealed a nearly perfect linear relation between both methods' MGs (r = 0.97, p <0.0001). Intraoperatively, after TAVI, Spearman correlation coefficient revealed a weak-to-moderate relation between post-TAVI TEE and LHC MGs (r = 0.33, p <0.0001). Significant differences were observed in categorizations between post-TAVI TEE MG and post-TAVI AT (McNemar test p = 0.0003) and between post-TAVI TEE MG and post-TAVI LHC MG (signed-rank test p <0.0001), with TEE MG more likely to misclassify a patient as abnormal. At discharge, 30% of patients had abnormal TTE MG, whereas 0% and 0.8% of patients had abnormal DVI and AT, respectively. Discharge TTE MG was not associated with death or hospitalization for heart failure at a median follow-up of 862 days. Post-TAVI Doppler-derived MG by intraoperative TEE was higher than LHC, despite being virtually identical before implantation. At discharge, patients were more likely to be classified as abnormal using MG than DVI and AT. Elevated MG at discharge was not associated with death or hospitalization for heart failure.

Three-Year Outcomes of Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation According to Annular Size

Data on the association between annular size and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) outcomes beyond 1 year are limited. The present study assessed the association between the aortic annulus size and TAVI clinical and hemodynamic outcomes at 3 years of follow-up. Patients were classified according to the aortic annulus size as having small, intermediate, and large annuli (size <400, 400 to 574, and ≥575 mm², respectively). The co-primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization. Further, the changes in hemodynamic outcomes over the follow-up period (median 37, interquartile range: 26 to 45 months) were assessed. The present analysis included 850 patients, with 182 patients (21.4%), 538 patients (63.3%), and 130 patients (15.3%) in the small, intermediate, and large-sized aortic annulus groups, respectively. The groups had comparable age and pre-TAVI pressure gradients; however, patients with small annuli had higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk scores. Adjusted Cox regression analysis showed that compared to patients with intermediate-sized annuli, patients with small and large annuli had similar all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72 to 1.69 and HR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.16, respectively) and heart failure hospitalization rates (HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.69 and HR = 1.26, 95% CI 0.73 to 2.17, respectively). However, patients with small annuli had consistently higher mean and peak pressure gradients and a higher risk of patient-prosthesis mismatch. The risks of moderate-to-severe regurgitation and structural valve deterioration were similar between the three groups. In conclusion, although patients with small annuli had higher transvalvular gradients, there was no significant association between the aortic annulus size and TAVI clinical outcomes at 3 years of follow-up. Future studies should compare the performance of transcatheter valve types in patients with different aortic annulus sizes.

Evaluation of the OpSens OptoWire III and Novel TAVR Algorithm to Measure Pressure Gradient During TAVR

Background

We aim to establish the degree of agreement related to gradient measurement during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) between the OpSens OptoWire III and its new proprietary TAVR algorithm and hemodynamic value derived by catheterization and echocardiogram (transthoracic echocardiogram and transesophageal echocardiogram).

Methods

The current study was a prospective, single-arm, single-center study. All subjects underwent hemodynamic assessment before and after TAVR using standard hemodynamic assessment using 2 pigtails, transthoracic echocardiogram, transesophageal echocardiogram, and the OpSens OptoWire III. The primary end point was the final post-TAVR mean gradient correlation between OpSens OptoWire III and hemodynamic values derived by catheterization.

Results

Between July 2021 and September 2021, 20 patients were enrolled. The median age was 79 [6.5] years, and 9 (45%) patients were female. The mean gradient before TAVR derived by 2-pigtail technique and the mean gradient using the OpSens OptoWire III were similar (35 ± 14 mm Hg vs 35 ± 14 mm Hg, P = 1.00), with an absolute mean difference of 2.2 ± 3.5 mm Hg and a strong correlation (r = 0.96, P < .0001). After TAVR, the mean gradient derived by 2-pigtail technique and the mean gradient using the OpSens OptoWire III were similar (2.2 ± 3.5 vs 2.8 ± 2.7, P = .16), with an absolute mean difference of 1.2 ± 1.3 mm Hg and a strong correlation (r = 0.89, P < .0001).

Conclusions

Hemodynamic assessment derived by the OpSens OptoWire III wire and its new TAVR algorithm demonstrated excellent correlation with measurements derived by 2 pigtails both before and after TAVR. Integration of this new technology within a dedicated TAVR wire with live hemodynamic assessment could bring meaningful value to TAVR operators.

Balloon- Versus Self-Expanding Valve Systems for Treating Small Failed Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: The LYTEN Trial

BACKGROUND

Data comparing valve systems in the valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV-TAVR) field has been obtained from retrospective studies.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the hemodynamic results between the balloon-expandable SAPIEN (3/ULTRA) (BEV) and self-expanding Evolut (R/PRO/PRO+) (SEV) valves in ViV-TAVR.

METHODS

Patients with a failed small (≤23 mm) surgical valve. were randomized to receive a BEV or a SEV. The primary endpoint was valve hemodynamics (maximal/mean residual gradients; severe prosthesis patient mismatch [PPM] or moderate-severe aortic regurgitation [AR]) at 30 days as evaluated by Doppler-echocardiography.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients were randomized, and of these, 98 patients finally underwent a ViV-TAVR procedure (BEV: 46, SEV: 52). The procedure was successful in all cases, with no differences in clinical outcomes at 30 days between groups (no death or stroke events). Patients in the SEV group exhibited lower mean and maximal transvalvular gradient values (15±8 vs 23±8 mmHg, p˂0.001; 28±16 vs 40±13 mmHg, p ˂0.001), and a tendency towards a lower rate of severe PPM (44% vs. 64%, p=0.07). There were no cases of moderate-severe AR. 55 consecutive patients (SEV: 27, BEV: 28) underwent invasive valve hemodynamic evaluation during the procedure, with no differences in mean and peak transvalvular gradients between both groups (p=0.41 and p=0.70, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with small failed aortic bioprostheses, ViV-TAVR with a SEV was associated with improved valve hemodynamics as evaluated by echocardiography. There were no differences between groups in intra-procedural invasive valve hemodynamics and 30-day clinical outcomes (NCT03520101).

In vitro Doppler versus catheter transvalvular pressure gradients in balloon-expandable versus self-expanding transcatheter aortic valves

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this in vitro study was to compare Doppler versus catheter transvalvular pressure gradients (TPG) in third generations balloon-expandable (BE) versus self-expanding (SE) transcatheter heart valves (THV).

BACKGROUND

TPG is a key parameter to assess and follow valve hemodynamic function following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). It remains uncertain and debated whether, and to which extent, TPGs differ according to the type of THV, that is, BE versus SE and to the method used for TPG measurement, that is, Doppler echocardiography versus cardiac catheterization.

METHODS

The CoreValve EVOLUT PRO 26 mm and the SAPIEN 3 23 mm THVs were tested in a left heart simulator using a 21 mm aortic annulus under following conditions: heart rate: 70 bpm, mean aortic pressure: 100 mmHg, stroke volume: 30, 70 and 100 ml. Mean TPGs were measured by continuous-wave Doppler and by micro-tip pressure catheters positioned in the left ventricle and at 50 mm downstream to the tip of the THV leaflets.

RESULTS

Doppler TPGs (9.5 ± 3.9 mmHg) were on average 40.5 ± 13.9% higher (p < 0.001) than catheter TPGs (6.3 ± 3.4 mmHg). Both Doppler and catheter TPGs were lower (p = 0.003) in the SE versus BE THVs (Doppler: 8.7 ± 3.5 vs. 10.7 ± 4.6; catheter: 5.0 ± 1.7 mmHg vs. 7.1 ± 2.2). The Doppler versus catheter difference in TPG increased with the higher flow conditions. The Doppler versus catheter difference in TPG was similar in BE versus SE THVs (3.6 ± 1.1 vs. 3.7 ± 1.4 mmHg or 42 ± 9 vs. 47 ± 9%; p = 0.58) overall and in each flow conditions.

CONCLUSION

The Doppler TPGs are, on average, 40% higher than the catheter TPGs for both BE and SE THVs. The SE THV had lower Doppler and catheter TPGs compared to the BE THV, at normal and high flow states. The absolute and percent differences between Doppler versus catheter TPGs were similar in BE versus SE THVs.

Comparison of Transvalvular Aortic Mean Gradients Obtained by Intraprocedural Echocardiography and Invasive Measurement in Balloon and Self-Expanding Transcatheter Valves

Background Concerns about discordance between echocardiographic and invasive mean gradients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with balloon-expandable valves (BEVs) versus self-expanding valves (SEVs) exist. Methods and Results In a multicenter study, direct-invasive and echocardiography-derived transvalvular mean gradients obtained before and after TAVR were compared as well as post-TAVR and discharge echocardiographic mean gradients in BEVs versus SEVs in 808 patients. Pre-TAVR, there was good correlation (R=0.614; P<0.0001) between direct-invasive and echocardiography-derived mean gradients and weak correlation (R=0.138; P<0.0001) post-TAVR. Compared with post-TAVR echocardiographic mean gradients, both valves exhibit lower invasive and higher discharge echocardiographic mean gradients. Despite similar invasive mean gradients, a small BEV exhibits higher post-TAVR and discharge echocardiographic mean gradients than a large BEV, whereas small and large SEVs exhibit similar post-TAVR and discharge mean gradients. An ejection fraction <50% (P=0.028) and higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality score (P=0.007), but not invasive or echocardiographic mean gradient ≥10 mm Hg (P=0.378 and P=0.341, respectively), nor discharge echocardiographic mean gradient ≥20 mm Hg (P=0.393), were associated with increased 2-year mortality. Conclusions Invasively measured and echocardiography-derived transvalvular mean gradients correlate well in aortic stenosis but weakly post-TAVR. Post-TAVR, echocardiography overestimates transvalvular mean gradients compared with invasive measurements, and poor correlation suggests these modalities cannot be used interchangeably. Moreover, echocardiographic mean gradients are higher on discharge than post-TAVR in all valves. Despite similar invasive mean gradients, a small BEV exhibits higher post-TAVR and discharge echocardiographic mean gradients than a large BEV, whereas small and large SEVs exhibit similar post-TAVR and discharge mean gradients. Immediately post-TAVR, elevated echocardiographic-derived mean gradients should be assessed with caution and compared with direct-invasive mean gradients. A low ejection fraction and higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, but not elevated mean gradients, are associated with increased 2-year mortality.

Invasive versus echocardiographic gradients in degenerated surgical aortic valve prostheses: A multicenter study

Objectives

To compare echocardiographic and invasive mean gradients obtained concomitantly in degenerated bioprosthetic surgical aortic valves (SAVRs).

Methods

In a multicenter study, we compared concomitant echocardiographic and invasive mean gradients of SAVR, obtained before valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in all patients, patients with primary stenosis (AS), primary aortic regurgitation (AR), and mixed aortic valve disease (MAVD), and in small versus large valves (≤ or >23 mm). Dimensionless index (DI) was calculated in all groups.

Results

In total, 74 patients were included and data presented as median (interquartile range). Echocardiography-catheterization mean gradient discordance was observed in all patients (invasive = 22 mm Hg [11-34] vs echocardiographic = 32 mm Hg [21-42], P = .013), small valves (invasive = 15 mm Hg [8-34] vs echocardiographic = 28 mm Hg [21-41], P = .013), and large valves (invasive = 20 mm Hg [8.5-27.13] vs echocardiographic = 32 mm Hg [25.5 – 41.5], P < .0001), with a bias of 8 ± 15 mm Hg and wide limits of agreement (–22 to 39 mm Hg) on Bland–Altman plots, indicating these modalities may not be interchangeable. Discordance occurred in AR (invasive = 3 mm Hg [1-6] vs echocardiographic = 12 mm Hg [7-22], P = .017) and in MAVD (invasive = 19 mm Hg [12-29] vs echocardiographic = 31 mm Hg [23-39], P < .0001) but not in AS (invasive = 35 mm Hg [24-45] vs echocardiographic = 41 mm Hg [30-50], P = .45). A lower DI (0.21 [0.14-0.25]) occurred in AS compared with MAVD (0.31 [0.19-0.39]) and AR (0.55 [0.51-0.69]), P < .0001.

Conclusions

Discordance between echocardiography and invasive mean gradients exists in degenerated SAVR, regardless of valve size, but depends on mechanism of failure and DI helps stratify these patients. With a discrepancy between echocardiographic mean gradients AND the patient's symptoms OR the valve leaflet structure and/or mobility on imaging, especially before redo-SAVR or valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement, invasive gradients may adjudicate the true valvular hemodynamics.

Impact of Flow on Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

Severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) is diagnosed by an indexed effective orifice area <0.65 cm²/m², which is derived from stroke volume index. We examined the impact of flow, determined by stroke volume index, on severe PPM following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).

METHODS

We included SAVR patients from the PARTNER 2A trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve 2A) and TAVR patients from the PARTNER 2 S3i (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve 2 S3i) registry. The primary end point was the separate analysis of all-cause death, cardiac death, and rehospitalization at 5 years. Following TAVR and SAVR, we compared the primary end points between severe versus no-severe PPM in all patients, in low flow (LF), and in normal flow. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine variables associated with the end points.

RESULTS

Nine hundred fifty-four TAVR and 726 SAVR patients with PPM and flow data were included. Severe PPM following TAVR was significantly lower compared with SAVR in all patients (9% versus 28%, P<0.0001), in normal flow (5% versus 8%, P=0.04), and in LF (20% versus 42%, P<0.0001). Severe PPM was associated with rehospitalization following TAVR (odds ratio, 1.52 [95% CI, 1.01-2.29], P=0.0456) and SAVR (odds ratio, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.06-2.16], P=0.0237). Severe PPM in LF was independently associated with cardiac death following TAVR (odds ratio, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.06-3.23], P=0.0308). Following SAVR, severe PPM in LF and low ejection fraction was associated with increased cardiac death (35.26% versus 12.51%, P=0.01) and rehospitalization (37.59% versus 15.46%, P=0.006) compared with severe PPM in LF and preserved ejection fraction, respectively. Severe PPM in normal flow was not associated with clinical outcomes despite higher gradients and smaller valves compared with severe PPM in LF.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe PPM is more common following SAVR compared with TAVR. Regardless of the implanted valve size or gradient, severe PPM impacts mortality only in patients with LF following TAVR and LF and low ejection fraction following SAVR. Severe PPM in normal flow is not associated with poor outcomes. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT01314313 and NCT02687035.

Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement in the PARTNER 2 Trial and Registry

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare incidence and impact of measured prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM_M) versus predicted PPM (PPM_P) after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

BACKGROUND

TAVR studies have used measured effective orifice area indexed (EOAi) to body surface area (BSA) to define PPM, but most SAVR series have used predicted EOAi. This difference may contribute to discrepancies in incidence and outcomes of PPM between series.

METHODS

The study analyzed SAVR patients from the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) 2A trial and TAVR patients from the PARTNER 2 SAPIEN 3 Intermediate Risk registry. PPM was classified as moderate if EOAi ≤0.85 cm²/m² (≤0.70 if obese: body mass index ≥30 kg/m²) and severe if EOAi ≤0.65 cm²/m² (≤0.55 if obese). PPM_M was determined by the core lab-measured EOAi on 30-day echocardiogram. PPM_P was determined by 2 methods: 1) using normal EOA reference values previously reported for each valve model and size (PPM_P1; n = 929 SAVR, 1,069 TAVR) indexed to BSA; and 2) using normal reference EOA predicted from aortic annulus size measured by computed tomography (PPM_P2; n = 864 TAVR only) indexed to BSA. Primary endpoint was the composite of 5-year all-cause death and rehospitalization.

RESULTS

The incidence of moderate and severe PPM_P was much lower than PPM_M in both SAVR (PPM_P1: 28.4% and 1.2% vs. PPM_M: 31.0% and 23.6%) and TAVR (PPM_P1: 21.0% and 0.1% and PPM_P2: 17.0% and 0% vs. PPM_M: 27.9% and 5.7%). The incidence of severe PPM_M and severe PPM_P1 was lower in TAVR versus SAVR (P < 0.001). The presence of PPM by any method was associated with higher transprosthetic gradient. Severe PPM_P1 was independently associated with events in SAVR after adjustment for sex and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (hazard ratio: 3.18;95% CI: 1.69-5.96; P < 0.001), whereas no association was observed between PPM by any method and outcomes in TAVR.

CONCLUSIONS

EOAi measured by echocardiography results in a higher incidence of PPM following SAVR or TAVR than PPM based on predicted EOAi. Severe PPM_P is rare (<1.5%), but is associated with increased all-cause death and rehospitalization after SAVR, whereas it is absent following TAVR.

Valve-in-Surgical-Valve With SAPIEN 3 for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Based on Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality

[Figure: see text].

Real world outcomes using 20 mm balloon expandable SAPIEN 3/ultra valves compared to larger valves (23, 26, and 29 mm)-a propensity matched analysis

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

Small balloon expandable valves have higher echocardiographic transvalvular gradients and rates of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) compared to larger valves. However, the impact of these echocardiographic findings on clinical outcomes is unknown. We sought to determine the clinical outcomes of 20 mm SAPIEN 3 (S3 BEV) compared to larger S3 BEV in relation to echocardiographic hemodynamics.

METHODS

Using the STS/ACC transcatheter valve registry, we performed a propensity-matched comparison of patients undergoing treatment of native aortic valve stenosis using transfemoral, balloon-expandable implantation of 20 mm and ≥ 23 mm S3 BEVs. Baseline and procedure characteristics, echocardiographic variables and survival were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of 1-year mortality.

RESULTS

After propensity matching of the 20 mm and ≥ 23 mm SAPIEN 3 valves, 3,931 pairs with comparable baseline characteristics were identified. Small valves were associated with significantly higher echocardiographic gradients at discharge (15.7 ± 7.1 mmHg vs. 11.7 ± 5.5 mmHg, p < 0.0001) and severe PPM rates (21.5% vs. 9.7%, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in 1-year all-cause mortality (20 mm: 13.0% vs. ≥23 mm: 12.7%, p = 0.72) or other major adverse event rates and outcomes between the two cohorts. Based on a multivariable analysis, elevated discharge mean gradient (>20 mmHg), severe PPM and the use of 20 mm versus ≥23 mm were not independent predictors of 1-year mortality.

CONCLUSION

SAPIEN 3 20 mm valves were associated with higher echocardiographic gradients, and severe PPM rates compared to larger valves but these factors were not associated with significant differences in 1-year all-cause mortality or rehospitalization.