Short- and long-term prognostic value of right ventricular function in patients with first acute ST elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty

Outcome of Patients With Cardiogenic Shock and Previous Right Ventricular Impairment Represented by Decreased Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion and Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion to Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure Ratio

This study investigates the prognostic impact of known decreased ratio of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) to pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) and TAPSE in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). In patients with pulmonary artery hypertension and in critically ill patients, decreased TAPSE and TAPSE/PASP ratio are known to be negative predictors. However, studies regarding the prognostic impact in patients with CS are limited. Consecutive patients with CS from June 2019 to May 2021 treated at a single center were included. Medical history including echocardiographic parameters such as TAPSE and PASP was documented for each patient. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 days. Statistical analyses included univariable t test, Spearman's correlation, C-statistics, Kaplan-Meier analyses, and Cox proportional regression analyses. A total of 90 patients with CS and measurement of TAPSE and TAPSE/PASP ratio were included. TAPSE and TAPSE/PASP ratio measured several months before intensive care unit admission were both able to predict 30-day survival in CS patients, and were both lower in 30-day nonsurvivors. TAPSE/PASP ratio <0.4 mm/mmHg (log-rank p = 0.006) and TAPSE <18 mm (log-rank p = 0.004) were associated with increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality. After multivariable adjustment, TAPSE/PASP ratio <0.4 mm/mmHg was not able to predict 30-day all-cause mortality, whereas TAPSE <18 mm was still significantly associated with the primary endpoint (hazard ratio 2.336, confidence interval 1.067 to 5.115, p = 0.034). In consecutive patients presenting with CS, compared to TAPSE alone, previously determined TAPSE/PASP ratio did not improve risk prediction for 30-day all-cause mortality.

Right Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain and Short-Term Prognosis in Patients With First Acute Myocardial Infarction

Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a recognized predictor of dismal prognosis. However, the most reliable RV index to predict mortality early after revascularization remains undetermined. This study aimed to explore the ability of RV global longitudinal strain (GLS) to predict inhospital mortality in patients with first AMI. All consecutive patients with first AMI were prospectively enrolled from March 2022 until February 2023. An echocardiogram was performed 24 hours after successful revascularization and RV GLS alongside conventional echocardiographic indexes were measured. Inhospital mortality was recorded. A total of 300 patients (age 61.2 ± 11.8 years, 74% male) were included in the study. RV GLS was the only RV performance index that differed significantly between anterior and inferior ST-segment-elevation patients with AMI (14.5 ± 5.2% vs 17.4 ± 5.1% respectively, p <0.001). After revascularization, 23 patients (7.7%) died in hospital. The model of Global Registry of Acute Coronary Event risk score and left ventricular ejection fraction, built for predicting inhospital mortality, significantly improved its prognostic performance only by the addition of RV GLS (chi-square value increase by 7.485, p = 0.006) compared with the other RV function indexes. RV GLS was independently associated with inhospital mortality (odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 0.97, p = 0.017) after adjustment for Global Registry of Acute Coronary Event risk score and left ventricular ejection fraction. Echocardiographic RV GLS measured 24 hours after revascularization in patients with first AMI outperformed conventional RV function indexes in predicting inhospital mortality.

Prognostic Implications of Clinical, Laboratory and Echocardiographic Biomarkers in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction-Rationale and Design of the ''CLEAR-AMI Study''

BACKGROUND

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains a major cause of death worldwide. Survivors of AMI are particularly at high risk for additional cardiovascular events. Consequently, a comprehensive approach to secondary prevention is necessary to mitigate the occurrence of downstream complications. This may be achieved through a multiparametric tailored risk stratification by incorporating clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic parameters.

METHODS

The ''CLEAR-AMI Study'' (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05791916) is a non-interventional, prospective study including consecutive patients with AMI without a known history of coronary artery disease. All patients satisfying these inclusion criteria are enrolled in the present study. The rationale of this study is to refine risk stratification by using clinical, laboratory and novel echocardiographic biomarkers. All the patients undergo a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiographic assessment, including strain and myocardial work analysis of the left and right heart chambers, within 48 h of admission after coronary angiography. Their laboratory profile focusing on systemic inflammation is captured during the first 24 h upon admission, and their demographic characteristics, past medical history, and therapeutic management are recorded. The angioplasty details are documented, the non-culprit coronary lesions are archived, and the SYNTAX score is employed to evaluate the complexity of coronary artery disease. A 24-month follow-up period will be recorded for all patients recruited.

CONCLUSION

The ''CLEAR-AMI" study is an ongoing prospective registry endeavoring to refine risk assessment in patients with AMI without a known history of coronary artery disease, by incorporating echocardiographic parameters, biochemical indices, and clinical and coronary characteristics in the acute phase of AMI.

Prognostic Value of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and NT-proBNP in Patients with Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Objective

Our aim was to assess systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and NT-proBNP value either in singly or in combination to predict acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patient prognosis.

Methods

Analyzed retrospectively the clinical features and laboratory data of STEMI confirmed patients in our hospital from January to December 2020. The levels of SII and NT-proBNP were detected. The Kaplan-Meier approach and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient were used to construct the overall major adverse cardiac event (MACE) curve. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was applied to detect MACE predictors. In addition, the Delong test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyzed each factor performance on its own and composite multivariate index to predict MACEs.

Results

The MACE group showed statistically significant differences in SII, NT- proBNP in comparison to the non-MACE group (P=0.003, P <0.001). Based on Kaplan-Meier analysis, SII and NT-proBNP showed positive correlation with MACE (log-rank P < 0.001). SII and NT-proBNP were independent predicting factors for long-term MACEs in multivariate Cox regression analysis (P <0.001, HR: 2.952, 95% CI 1.565-5.566; P <0.001, HR: 2.112, 95% CI 1.662-2.683). SII and NT-proBNP exhibited a positive correlation (R = 0.187, P < 0.001) in correlation analysis. According to the ROC statistical analysis, the combination exhibited 78.0% sensitivity and 88.0% specificity in the prediction of MACE. According to the results of the AUC and Delong test, the combined SII and NT-proBNP performed better as a prognostic index than each of the individual factor indexes separately (Z = 2.622, P = 0.009; Z = 3.173, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

SII and NT-proBNP were independent indicators of clinical prognosis in acute STEMI patients, and they correlated positively. These factors could be combined to improve clinical prognosis.

Predictive value of myocardial strain on myocardial infarction size by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

Background: The correlation between myocardial strain and infraction size by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is not clear.

Objective: To investigate the correlation between myocardial strain and myocardial infarction size in patients of acute STEMI with preserved LVEF.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to assess 31 patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who received cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging during hospitalization at the Central Hospital of Shandong First Medical University from 2019 to 2022 and whose echocardiography indicated preserved LVEF (LVEF≥50%). The control group consisted of 21 healthy adults who underwent CMR during the same period. We compared the CMR characteristics, global and segmental strain between the two groups. Furthermore, the correlation between the global strain and the segmental strain of the left ventricle and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were evaluated.

Results: Compared with healthy controls, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of STEMI patients with preserved LVEF was significantly decreased (p < 0.05). Moreover, the global radial strain (GRS) (24.09% [IQR:17.88–29.60%] vs. 39.56% [IQR:29.19–42.20%], p < 0.05), global circumferential strain (GCS) [−14.66% (IQR: 17.91–11.56%) vs. −19.26% (IQR: 21.03–17.73%), p < 0.05], and global longitudinal strains (GLS) (−8.88 ± 2.25% vs. −13.46 ± 2.63%, p < 0.05) were damaged in patients. Furthermore, GCS and GLS were associated with LGE size (%left ventricle) (GCS: r = 0.58, p < 0.05; GLS: r = 0.37, p < 0.05). In the multivariate model, we found that LGE size was significantly associated with GCS (β coefficient = 2.110, p = 0.016) but was not associated with GLS (β coefficient = −0.102, p = 0.900) and LVEF (β coefficient = 0.227, p = 0.354). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) results showed that GCS emerged as the strongest LGE size (LGE >25%) prognosticator among strain parameters (AUC: 0.836 [95% CI, 0.692—0.981], sensitivity: 91%, specificity: 80%) and was significantly better (p = 0.001) than GLS [AUC: 0.761 (95% CI, 0.583—0.939), sensitivity: 64%, specificity: 85%] and LVEF [AUC: 0.673 (95% CI, 0.469—0.877), sensitivity: 73%, specificity: 70%].

Conclusion: Among STEMI patients with preserved LVEF after PCI, CMR-FT-derived GCS had superior diagnostic accuracy than GLS and LVEF in predicting myocardial infarction size.

The Prognostic Importance of Right Ventricular Longitudinal Strain in Patients with Cardiomyopathies, Connective Tissue Diseases, Coronary Artery Disease, and Congenital Heart Diseases

Right ventricular (RV) systolic function represents an important independent predictor of adverse outcomes in many cardiovascular (CV) diseases. However, conventional parameters of RV systolic function (tricuspid annular plane excursion (TAPSE), RV myocardial performance index (MPI), and fractional area change (FAC)) are not always able to detect subtle changes in RV function. New evidence indicates a significantly higher predictive value of RV longitudinal strain (LS) over conventional parameters. RVLS showed higher sensitivity and specificity in the detection of RV dysfunction in the absence of RV dilatation, apparent wall motion abnormalities, and reduced global RV systolic function. Additionally, RVLS represents a significant and independent predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (CMP), hypertrophic CMP, arrhythmogenic RV CMP, and amyloidosis, but also in patients with connective tissue diseases and patients with coronary artery disease. Due to its availability, echocardiography remains the main imaging tool for RVLS assessment, but cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) also represents an important additional imaging tool in RVLG assessment. The findings from the large studies support the routine evaluation of RVLS in the majority of CV patients, but this has still not been adopted in daily clinical practice. This clinical review aims to summarize the significance and predictive value of RVLS in patients with different types of cardiomyopathies, tissue connective diseases, and coronary artery disease.