Rural and remote early psychosis intervention services: the Gordian knot of early intervention

Monthly engagement with EIP keyworkers was associated with a five-fold increase in the odds of engagement with psychosocial interventions

BACKGROUND

Early intervention in psychosis (EIP) supports people who are experiencing their first episode of psychosis (FEP). A new Model of Care (MoC) for EIP services was launched in Ireland in 2019. Three EIP demonstration sites were chosen to test this MoC through a 'hub and spoke' approach. These services were a new way of organising care for people experiencing FEP, based upon a recovery model of care, and which sought to standardise care, improve access by clinically led multidisciplinary teams. This included newly created EIP keyworker roles whereby keyworkers assumed responsibilities regarding assessment, comprehensive individual care planning and coordination of care.

METHODS

A mixed methods design utilising the UK Medical Research Council's process evaluation framework. Purposive sampling techniques were utilised. Descriptive analyses and logistic regression were performed to examine how increased keyworker engagement influenced the use of other psychosocial interventions within the EIP demonstration sites. Thematic analyses was used for qualitative data.

RESULTS

There was a strong positive relationship between keyworker contacts and psychosocial interventions offered. Specifically, the odds of achieving at least monthly engagement with cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp; (5.76 (2.43-13.64), p < 0.001), and behavioural family therapy (BFT; (5.52(1.63-18.69, p < 0.006)) increased by fivefold with each additional monthly keyworker contact. For individual placement support (IPS) each additional monthly keyworker contact was associated with a three-fold increase in the odds of achieving monthly attendance with IPS (3.73 (1.64-8.48), p < 0.002). Qualitative results found that the EIP keyworker role as viewed by both service users and staff as a valuable nodal point, with a particular emphasis on care coordination and effective communication.

CONCLUSIONS

This study advances the understanding of keyworker effects through qualitative evidence of keyworkers functioning as a "linchpin" to the service, while the positive response association between keyworker contacts and engagement with other services provides quantitative support for keyworkers reducing the organisational or structural barriers to service access. Given the importance of these positions, health systems should ensure that EIP programmes identify qualified and experienced staff to fill these roles, as well as allocate the appropriate funding and protected time to support keyworker engagement and impact.

Predictors of positive outcomes from 'Early Intervention in Psychosis': protocol for a national retrospective cohort study

Background

Psychotic disorders are severe and prevalent mental health conditions associated with long-term disability, reduced quality of life, and substantial economic costs. Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services aim to provide timely and comprehensive treatment for psychotic disorders, and EIP service input is associated with improved outcomes. However, there is limited understanding of the specific components of EIP care that contribute to these improvements. There is significant nationwide variability in the commissioning and delivery of EIP, with individuals receiving different packages of components from different services. In this study, we seek to explore associations between EIP components and clinically significant outcomes, in order to understand the mechanisms underlying improved psychosis care.

Methods

This national retrospective cohort study will utilize data from the 2019 National Clinical Audit of Psychosis (NCAP), examining the care received by 10,560 individuals treated by EIP services in England. Exposure data from the NCAP, capturing the components of care delivered by EIP services, will be linked with outcome data from routine NHS Digital datasets over a three-year follow-up period. This will be the first study to use this method to examine this population in England. The primary outcomes will be surrogate measures of relapse of psychosis (hospital admission and referral to community-based crisis intervention services). Secondary outcomes include duration of admissions, emergency hospital attendances, episodes of detention under the Mental Health Act, and all-cause mortality. We will use multilevel regression to examine associations between exposures and outcome events. We will handle missing data using appropriate imputation techniques.

Discussion

This study aims to provide valuable insights into the long-term effects of variations in EIP service delivery. The study involves a large, diverse cohort including individuals treated by every EIP service in England. While there are limitations inherent in the observational nature of the study, any associations identified will be of great relevance to clinicians, researchers, and policymakers seeking to optimize EIP care. The results will enable more targeted treatment planning, resource allocation, and potential innovations in EIP care, ultimately leading to improved prognoses for people experiencing psychosis.

Understanding Clinician's Experiences with Implementation of a Younger Onset Dementia Telehealth Service

The successful implementation of telehealth services depends largely on clinician acceptance of telehealth as a viable healthcare option and their adoption of telehealth methods into their clinical practice. While growing research supports the feasibility of telehealth services, no research has evaluated clinicians' experiences during the implementation of a younger onset dementia telehealth service. Semi-structured group interviews were conducted with 7 metropolitan (hub) clinicians and 16 rural (spoke) clinicians during the pre-and post-implementation phases of a novel Younger onset dementia (YOD) telehealth service. Reflexive thematic analysis identified five themes at pre-implementation: clinical need, previous experiences and views, potential telehealth barriers, solutions to potential telehealth barriers, and potential clinical outcomes. At post-implementation, nine themes were identified: clinical need, clinical relationships, concerns about the future of rural healthcare, clinical practice and resourcing factors, patient suitability, difficulties with technology, service quality, the way forward, and the impact of COVID-19. Most clinicians held positive views regarding the service, particularly the ability to provide more options to rural-dwelling patients. However, some concerns about threats to rural healthcare and the validity of telehealth assessments remained. Overall, this study has identified service implementation barriers and facilitators and contributes to the long-term sustainability of current and future telehealth YOD services.

Evidence base for early intervention in psychosis services in rural areas: A critical review

AIM

Early Intervention in Psychosis teams (EITs) are a growing entity internationally, yet they remain under-researched given challenges facing their delivery. Model adaptations include stand-alone services, a hub-and-spoke model with various bases and integrating specialist staff into existing mental health teams. The present critical review focuses on reviewing the evidence base for the delivery of EITs in rural areas, first pertaining to evidence for model adherence and second to clinically outcomes.

METHOD

A systematic literature search was undertaken, finding 53 papers of interest. Nine papers met the inclusion criteria. A critical appraisal tool was used to consider the quality of the evidence and a narrative review of their findings is presented.

RESULTS

The five studies reporting clinical outcomes of rural EITs demonstrate positive outcomes of a hub-and-spoke and stand-alone EIT on reducing hospital admissions, psychotic symptoms and improving quality of life. One study directly comparing hub-and-spoke to stand-alone EIT found that hub-and-spoke EIT had more positive outcomes than a stand-alone service. Of the studies attempting to promote adherence to EIT model in rural areas, services show low overall adherence and report issues pertaining to funding and managerial support for practical barriers to implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

EIT services in rural areas may show similar positive outcomes to urban areas and adaptations to suit rural populations appear acceptable, such as using a hub-and-spoke model, though further research is required. Adherence to EIT service models in rural areas may be limited and training programmes to promote adherence benefit from managerial and financial support.

The clinical significance of duration of untreated psychosis: an umbrella review and random-effects meta-analysis

The idea that a longer duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) leads to poorer outcomes has contributed to extensive changes in mental health ser-vices worldwide and has attracted considerable research interest over the past 30 years. However, the strength of the evidence underlying this notion is unclear. To address this issue, we conducted an umbrella review of available meta-analyses and performed a random-effects meta-analysis of primary studies. MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycINFO and EMBASE were searched from inception to September 3, 2020 to identify relevant meta-analyses of studies including patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, first-episode psychosis, or affective and non-affective psychosis. Thirteen meta-analyses were included, corresponding to 129 individual studies with a total sample size of 25,657 patients. We detected potential violations of statistical assumptions in some of these meta-analyses. We therefore conducted a new random-effects meta-analysis of primary studies. The association between DUP and each outcome was graded according to a standardized classification into convincing, highly suggestive, suggestive, weak, or non-significant. At first presentation, there was suggestive evidence for a relationship between longer DUP and more severe negative symptoms (beta=-0.07, p=3.6×10^-5 ) and higher chance of previous self-harm (odds ratio, OR=1.89, p=1.1×10^-5 ). At follow-up, there was highly suggestive evidence for a relationship between longer DUP and more severe positive symptoms (beta=-0.16, p=4.5×10^-8 ), more severe negative symptoms (beta=-0.11, p=3.5×10^-10 ) and lower chance of remission (OR=2.16, p=3.0×10^-10 ), and suggestive evidence for a relationship between longer DUP and poorer overall functioning (beta=-0.11, p=2.2×10^-6 ) and more severe global psychopathology (beta=-0.16, p=4.7×10^-6 ). Results were unchanged when analysis was restricted to prospective studies. These effect sizes are clinically meaningful, with a DUP of four weeks predicting >20% more severe symptoms at follow-up relative to a DUP of one week. We conclude that DUP is an important prognostic factor at first presentation and predicts clinically relevant outcomes over the course of illness. We discuss conceptual issues in DUP research and methodological limitations of current evidence, and provide recommendations for future research.

Early intervention services for psychosis in Ireland: are we there yet?

Early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services are now a priority for Ireland’s Health Service Executive (HSE). A Model of Care for EIP services has been completed after wide consultation. It has just been launched by the Minister for Mental Health and the aim now is to roll out EIP services throughout the country. The Model of Care outlines the rational, configuration, resources, governance, and quality assurance required to operate EIP services. Two models are recommended. The first is a Hub & Spoke service model for rural and smaller urban areas. The second is a Stand-Alone service model for large urban and metropolitan areas. Introducing EIP services is going to be a challenge but there are plenty of good examples overseas. They have been shown to greatly enhance local services’ ability to meet the needs of people developing psychotic disorders. They bring with them better outcomes, service satisfaction and cost savings.

Fidelity scales and performance measures to support implementation and quality assurance for first episode psychosis services

AIM

The purpose of this paper is to review fidelity and outcome measures which can be used to support broad implementation of first episode psychosis services and ensure quality of existing services. First episode psychosis services use a combination of evidence-based practices to improve the outcome of a first episode of psychosis and the early stages of schizophrenia. Now that there is an established international evidence base to show that they are effective, efforts are being made to make such services widely available as a routine part of health care.

METHODS

We provide an overview of the literature from the perspective of an expert task force that was commissioned to report to the board of the International Early Psychosis Association IEPA. First, we examined the evidence-based components that underpin first episode psychosis services and identified common elements. Next, we reviewed the availability of fidelity measures and outcome indicators, finally we reviewed how broadly these services are delivered internationally, and the barriers to ensuring broad access to quality services.

RESULTS

There is a growing consensus about the elements required to deliver effective services. Fidelity scales and performance measures are available to assess quality, access, and outcome. First episode psychosis services are variably offered in high-income countries and rarely with attention to access and quality of services. Several strategies to promote implementation are identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Fidelity scales and outcome measure are valuable resources to support widespread implementation and quality assurance for first episode psychosis services.

Youth mental ill health and secondary school completion in Australia: time to act

AIM

This paper reviews the evidence of youth mental ill health and its impact on secondary school educational attainment.

METHODS

This narrative review presents the current research related to the mental ill health of young people in urban and rural Australia, their educational attainment and the effectiveness of mental health strategies implemented in secondary schools.

RESULTS

The prevalence of mental ill health is high for Australian young people and the onset of depression, anxiety, substance-use disorders and first episode psychosis (FEP) commonly occurs when the individual is at school. The prevalence is reported to be higher for rural young people and barriers to treatment exist. Current evidence suggests that 40% of young people experiencing depression or anxiety disorders are not completing secondary school. Further evidence shows that over 50% of individuals who experience FEP do not finish secondary school. Current mental health promotion strategies employed in secondary schools have not been shown to reduce rates of depression or anxiety in adolescence nor identify prodromal or acute FEP. These strategies have not led to interventions that assist young people with mental ill health to finish school.

CONCLUSIONS

Not completing secondary school can limit employment options, lead to severe levels of disadvantage and increased burden on welfare and healthcare systems. All young people, including those in rural areas, have the right to education and should not be disadvantaged in their educational aspirations because they have an emerging or current mental illness.

Factors Associated with Timely Physician Follow-up after a First Diagnosis of Psychotic Disorder

OBJECTIVE

Physician follow-up after a first diagnosis of psychotic disorder is crucial for improving treatment engagement. We examined the factors associated with physician follow-up within 30 days of a first diagnosis of schizophrenia.

METHOD

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked health administrative data to identify incident cases of schizophrenia between 1999 and 2008 among people aged 14 to 35 years in Ontario. We estimated the proportion of patients who had physician follow-up within 30 days of the index diagnosis. We used multilevel logistic regression models to examine the factors associated with any physician follow-up and follow-up by a psychiatrist.

RESULTS

We identified 20,096 people with a first diagnosis of schizophrenia. Approximately 40% of people did not receive any physician follow-up within 30 days, and nearly 60% did not receive follow-up by a psychiatrist. Males had lower odds of receiving any physician follow-up, and the odds of psychiatrist follow-up decreased with increasing age and were lower for those living in rural areas. Both prior contact with a general practitioner for a mental health reason and prior contact with a psychiatrist were strongly associated with higher odds of receiving both types of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Many people do not have any physician contact within 30 days of the first diagnosis of schizophrenia, and patients without prior engagement with mental health services are at highest risk. We need information on the reasons behind this lack of physician follow-up to inform strategies aimed at improving engagement with services during the early stages of psychosis.

Systematic review of the evidence for service models delivering early intervention in psychosis outside the stand-alone centre

AIM

Although early intervention in psychosis is an accepted policy internationally, the evidence base for this paradigm, originates mostly from the specialist model. In a real world setting, variations of this model are often implemented. The aim of this paper is to systematically evaluate the evidence for delivering early intervention outside the specialist stand-alone centre.

METHODS

A systematic search following the PRISMA guidelines was undertaken in Medline, PsycInfo, Embase and the Cochrane trials register. The search was limited to articles in English from 1990 to end of January 2016. Inclusion criteria for the review comprised comparative evaluations of services delivering early intervention in psychosis outside the specialist model. Exclusion criteria included prodromal services, descriptions of services without reference to a comparator and stand-alone specialist services evaluated in comparison to treatment as usual.

RESULTS

There were 637 unique citations. Twenty-eight papers were reviewed at second-stage screening. The majority were excluded as they compared specialist early intervention with treatment as usual, did not evaluate the first episode or had no comparator. Seven peer-reviewed publications and two conference papers fulfilled criteria evaluating models of delivering early intervention other than the specialist model.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a spaucity of evidence evaluating models other than specialist models in early intervention. Published studies are heterogeneous in design and outcome. Although there have been two recent trials evaluating integrated early intervention in comparison with treatment as usual, it remains unclear whether reported improved outcomes of specialist centres apply to other models.

A first step in system improvement: a survey of Early Psychosis Intervention Programmes in Ontario

AIM

Ontario, Canada is a large province with a geographically dispersed population. Early psychosis intervention (EPI) programmes are available province-wide, with delivery approaches adapted to context. This study examined EPI programme delivery in relation to recently released provincial EPI Program Standards, and variations based on geographic context.

METHODS

The data source was a province-wide key informant survey of early psychosis programmes conducted after release of the Standards. Chi-squared tests compared large- and small-area programmes on selected programme structural features and perceived adherence to 19 service components.

RESULTS

Responses were obtained from 52 programme sites, including 21 small-area programmes with 1 to 2 staff. In general, frequency of EPI delivery was highest for individual assessment and treatment components, and moderate for social supports and family support. Implementation was lowest for public education, early detection and recovery planning. Small-area programmes reported lower implementation for over half of the components, with differences statistically significant for psychiatric assessment and physical health monitoring.

CONCLUSION

Since the release of the Standards, the Ontario Ministry of Health has partnered with a provincial network of EPI stakeholders to support practice improvement. This survey identified components where more implementation support is needed, overall and for rural area delivery. Ultimately, systematic monitoring of programme fidelity and measuring client outcomes are key to advancing the quality of EPI programme delivery.

Implementation and evaluation of a quality improvement project: carepaths for Early Psychosis Intervention Programmes in Northeastern Ontario

AIM

This study aims to describe the implementation and evaluation of a quality improvement project, which aimed to standardize services and documentation across several district Early Psychosis Intervention Programmes in a rural region of Canada (Northeastern Ontario).

METHOD

A Carepath for early psychosis intervention (EPI), which outlined best practice EPI care pathways, was implemented across 12 EPI programme sites. It was hypothesized that the proportion of best practice interventions provided across the district programmes would increase after the implementation of the Carepath initiative and that documentation would be standardized. Pre-Carepath and post-Carepath chart audits evaluated the provision and documentation of EPI best practices that were specified in the Carepath.

RESULTS

Pre-audits and post-audits were completed on 110 and 108 client files, respectively. Chi-squared tests revealed that the post-audit frequencies were significantly higher than the pre-audit frequencies for two of the 12 EPI best practices that were evaluated (i.e. assessed impact on family and assessment of substance use). Standardization of documentation did not improve significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

The results are discussed in the context of barriers to implementing and evaluating the Carepaths. Various individual and agency level barriers are identified (e.g. staff resistance, resources and agency documentation parameters), and strategies to overcome them are discussed. It is concluded that, despite barriers to implementation and evaluation, Carepaths can be a useful tool for standardizing services and documentation across a network of EPI programmes and guiding programme evaluation and quality assurance.