1
|
Nørgaard JN, Moore KLF, Slørdahl TS, Vik A, Tvedt THA, Schjesvold F. VRD versus VCD as induction therapy before autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: a nationwide population-based study. Blood Cancer J 2024; 14:60. [PMID: 38594252 PMCID: PMC11004127 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-024-01047-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jakob Nordberg Nørgaard
- Oslo Myeloma Center, Department of Hematology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
- KG Jebsen Center for B cell malignancies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Kari Lenita Falck Moore
- Oslo Myeloma Center, Department of Hematology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- KG Jebsen Center for B cell malignancies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Tobias S Slørdahl
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Hematology, St. Olavs hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Anders Vik
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, The Arctic University of Norway, UiT, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Tor Henrik Anderson Tvedt
- Department of Hematology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Clinic for Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Fredrik Schjesvold
- Oslo Myeloma Center, Department of Hematology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- KG Jebsen Center for B cell malignancies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saeed N, Khan Z, Jehanzeb H, Shaikh T, Shaikh U, Adil SN, Madni V, Fatima H, Abiha UE, Ali N. Real-World Outcomes in Transplant-Ineligible Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Treated With Bortezomib/Cyclophosphamide/Dexamethasone and Bortezomib/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone as Upfront Treatment. Cureus 2024; 16:e58999. [PMID: 38800157 PMCID: PMC11127700 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological disorder characterized by aberrant multiplication of malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow. The current mainstay of treatment for patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) is a triplet regimen with a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory imide, and dexamethasone. The two most common of these triplet regimens are VLD (bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone) and VCD (bortezomib/cyclophosphamide/dexamethasone). This study aims to compare the outcomes between these two therapies in transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM. Methods We conducted a retrospective study at the Aga Khan University Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. All NDMM transplant-ineligible patients either receiving VLD or VCD therapy between January 2015 and December 2022 were included in our study. Hematological parameters before and after treatment were obtained from hospital records. Response to treatment was classified according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria as either complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR), minimal response (MR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD). The response to treatment as well as overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was compared between VCD and VLD therapy. A p-value of 0.05 or less was taken to be statistically significant. Results Twenty (23.8%) patients in the VCD group and 20 (23.0%) in the VLD group underwent complete remission. Seven (8.3%) patients experienced disease progression in the VCD group, while the figure stood at three (3.4%) in the VLD group. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall response rate between the VCD (58; 69.0%) and VLD (70; 80.5%) groups (p=0.086), a difference that was not statistically significant on the Chi-square test. OS was comparable between VCD (69.1 months, 95%CI: 61.3-77.0) and VLD (76.9 months, 95%CI: 69.0-85.0) therapies. Conclusions The study did not identify any statistically significant distinction in the treatment outcomes between the VCD and VLD regimens among NDMM patients ineligible for transplantation. Nevertheless, the study highlights the positive outcomes observed with both treatments in this specific patient cohort. This implies that either regimen could be deemed suitable as a treatment option for patients in low- and middle-income countries. Since both regimens demonstrate comparable effectiveness, assessing the cost-effectiveness of these regimens is crucial. Future research should also explore the economic aspects of the two treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nabiha Saeed
- Department of Oncology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK
| | - Zurrya Khan
- Department of Oncology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK
| | - Hamzah Jehanzeb
- Department of Oncology, Aga Khan University Medical College, Karachi, PAK
| | - Taha Shaikh
- Department of Oncology, Aga Khan University Medical College, Karachi, PAK
| | - Usman Shaikh
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine/Oncology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK
| | - Salman N Adil
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine/Oncology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK
| | - Varisha Madni
- Department of Oncology, Aga Khan University Medical College, Karachi, PAK
| | - Hania Fatima
- Department of Oncology, Aga Khan University Medical College, Karachi, PAK
| | - Umm E Abiha
- Department of Oncology, Aga Khan University Medical College, Karachi, PAK
| | - Natasha Ali
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine/Oncology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Partanen A, Waage A, Peceliunas V, Schjesvold F, Anttila P, Säily M, Uttervall K, Putkonen M, Carlson K, Haukas E, Sankelo M, Szatkowski D, Hansson M, Marttila A, Svensson R, Axelsson P, Lauri B, Mikkola M, Karlsson C, Abelsson J, Ahlstrand E, Sikiö A, Klimkowska M, Matuzeviciene R, Fenstad MH, Ilveskero S, Pelliniemi TT, Nahi H, Silvennoinen R. Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (IRD) Treatment with Cytogenetic Risk-Based Maintenance in Transplant-Eligible Myeloma: A Phase 2 Multicenter Study by the Nordic Myeloma Study Group. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1024. [PMID: 38473382 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16051024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2024] [Revised: 02/17/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Scarce data exist on double maintenance in transplant-eligible high-risk (HR) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. This prospective phase 2 study enrolled 120 transplant-eligible NDMM patients. The treatment consisted of four cycles of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRD) induction plus autologous stem cell transplantation followed by IRD consolidation and cytogenetic risk-based maintenance therapy with lenalidomide + ixazomib (IR) for HR patients and lenalidomide (R) alone for NHR patients. The main endpoint of the study was undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD) with sensitivity of <10-5 by flow cytometry at any time, and other endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We present the preplanned analysis after the last patient has been two years on maintenance. At any time during protocol treatment, 28% (34/120) had MRD < 10-5 at least once. At two years on maintenance, 66% of the patients in the HR group and 76% in the NHR group were progression-free (p = 0.395) and 36% (43/120) were CR or better, of which 42% (18/43) had undetectable flow MRD <10-5. Altogether 95% of the patients with sustained MRD <10-5, 82% of the patients who turned MRD-positive, and 61% of those with positive MRD had no disease progression at two years on maintenance (p < 0.001). To conclude, prolonged maintenance with all-oral ixazomib plus lenalidomide might improve PFS in HR patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anu Partanen
- Department of Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital, 70210 Kuopio, Finland
| | - Anders Waage
- Department of Hematology, St. Olavs Hospital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Valdas Peceliunas
- Hematology, Oncology and Transfusion Medicine Center, Vilnius University Hospital, 08661 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Fredrik Schjesvold
- Oslo Myeloma Center, Department of Hematology, Oslo University Hospital, 0450 Oslo, Norway
- KG Jebsen Center for B Cell Malignancies, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - Pekka Anttila
- Helsinki University Hospital Cancer Center Hematology, University of Helsinki, 00029 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Marjaana Säily
- Hematology-Oncology Unit, Oulu University Hospital Hematology, 90220 Oulu, Finland
| | - Katarina Uttervall
- Medical Unit Hematology, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 64 Solna, Sweden
- Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mervi Putkonen
- Department of Medicine, Turku University Hospital, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Kristina Carlson
- Department of Hematology, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Einar Haukas
- Stavanger University Hospital, 4011 Stavanger, Norway
| | - Marja Sankelo
- Hematology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Tampere University Hospital Hematology, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| | - Damian Szatkowski
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Palliative Care, Foerde Central Hospital, 6812 Foerde, Norway
| | - Markus Hansson
- Department of Hematology, Skåne University Hospital, 222 42 Lund, Sweden
| | - Anu Marttila
- Department of Medicine, Kymenlaakso Central Hospital, 48210 Kotka, Finland
| | - Ronald Svensson
- Department of Hematology, Linköping University Hospital, 581 85 Linköping, Sweden
| | - Per Axelsson
- Department of Haematology, Helsingborg Hospital, 252 23 Helsingborg, Sweden
| | - Birgitta Lauri
- Department of Hematology, Sunderby Hospital, 971 80 Luleå, Sweden
| | - Maija Mikkola
- Department of Medicine, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, 15850 Lahti, Finland
| | - Conny Karlsson
- Department of Haematology, Halland Hospital, 302 33 Halmstad, Sweden
| | - Johanna Abelsson
- Department of Hematology, Uddevalla Hospital, 451 53 Uddevalla, Sweden
| | - Erik Ahlstrand
- Department of Medicine, Örebro University Hospital, 701 85 Örebro, Sweden
| | - Anu Sikiö
- Department of Medicine, Central Finland Central Hospital, 40620 Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Monika Klimkowska
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cytology, Karolinska University Hospital, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Reda Matuzeviciene
- Department of Physiology, Biochemistry, Microbiology and Laboratory Medicine, Biomedical Sciences Institute, Vilnius University Hospital and Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Mona Hoysaeter Fenstad
- Department of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, 7030 Trondheim, Norway
| | - Sorella Ilveskero
- Clinical Chemistry, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Hareth Nahi
- Hematology Centre, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, 141 57 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Raija Silvennoinen
- Helsinki University Hospital Cancer Center Hematology, University of Helsinki, 00029 Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shimura Y, Shibayama H, Nakaya A, Yamamura R, Imada K, Kaneko H, Hanamoto H, Fuchida SI, Tanaka H, Kosugi S, Kiyota M, Matsui T, Kanda J, Iida M, Matsuda M, Uoshima N, Shibano M, Karasuno T, Hamada T, Ohta K, Ito T, Yagi H, Yoshihara S, Shimazaki C, Nomura S, Hino M, Takaori-Kondo A, Matsumura I, Kanakura Y, Kuroda J. Real-world data on induction therapy in patients with transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: retrospective analysis of 598 cases from Kansai Myeloma Forum. Int J Hematol 2023; 118:609-617. [PMID: 37668833 DOI: 10.1007/s12185-023-03653-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
To investigate the real-world clinical outcomes and management of novel drug-containing therapies for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients, we retrospectively analyzed data on the first-line treatment for newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible MM patients from Kansai Myeloma Forum, a registry network in Japan. A total of 598 patients treated with novel drugs between March 2007 and February 2018 were analyzed. Regimens used were VD (n = 305), Rd (n = 103), VMP (n = 97), VCD (n = 71), and VRd (n = 22). Younger patients tended to receive VRd or VCD, whereas the regimen with the highest median patient age was Rd. More than three-quarters of patients in the Rd group received a reduced dose of lenalidomide. The Rd and VRd groups had a relatively high incidence of infection and skin complications, and the VMP group had the highest incidence of peripheral neuropathy. Overall response rate did not differ significantly between regimens. Multivariate analysis in all patients revealed several poor prognostic factors, such as poor performance status. Novel drug-containing regimens for newly diagnosed MM showed a durable response with manageable AEs in the real-world setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuji Shimura
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-cho, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
| | - Hirohiko Shibayama
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Aya Nakaya
- Division of Hematology, First Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Yamamura
- Department of Hematology, Osaka Saiseikai Nakatsu Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazunori Imada
- Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hitomi Kaneko
- Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Hanamoto
- Department of Hematology, Kindai University Nara Hospital, Nara, Japan
| | - Shin-Ichi Fuchida
- Department of Hematology, Japan Community Health Care Organization Kyoto Kuramaguchi Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hirokazu Tanaka
- Department of Hematology and Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Satoru Kosugi
- Department of Internal Medicine (Hematology), Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Miki Kiyota
- Department of Hematology, Matsushita Memorial Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Toshimitsu Matsui
- Department of Hematology, Nishiwaki Municipal Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Junya Kanda
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masato Iida
- Kawasaki Hospital Internal Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | | | - Nobuhiko Uoshima
- Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daini Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masaru Shibano
- Department of Hematology, Sakai City Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takahiro Karasuno
- Department of Hematology, Rinku General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Kensuke Ohta
- Hematology Ohta Clinic, Shinsaibashi, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tomoki Ito
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hideo Yagi
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, Nara, Japan
| | - Satoshi Yoshihara
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Chihiro Shimazaki
- Department of Hematology, Japan Community Health Care Organization Kyoto Kuramaguchi Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shosaku Nomura
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masayuki Hino
- Department of Hematology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akifumi Takaori-Kondo
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Itaru Matsumura
- Department of Hematology and Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Junya Kuroda
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-cho, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Afram G, Chaireti R, Uttervall K, Luong V, Lund J, Kashif M, Gahrton G, Alici E, Nahi H. Conditioning with melphalan 200 mg/m 2 and subsequent ASCT improves progression-free and overall survival in elderly myeloma patients compared to standard of care. Eur J Haematol 2022; 109:749-754. [PMID: 36066204 PMCID: PMC9826071 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Despite the effectiveness of newer drugs for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), the outcomes are further improved by subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Data on effectiveness in older patients are limited. We compared outcomes in patients aged 65-75 years depending on whether they were treated with ASCT or not and compared those to outcomes in patients <65 years. METHODS This was a retrospective, single-center study. We compared progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for all MM patients below and above the age of 65 years treated ± ASCT at the Karolinska University Hospital between 2010 and 2020. PFS and OS were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Variables affecting PFS and OS were evaluated using Cox regression model. RESULTS Both PFS and OS were improved in the group 65-75 years treated +ASCT compared to those treated pharmacologically (p = 0.008 and p < 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences between patients <65 years and those 65-75 years treated with ASCT. CONCLUSION The findings indicate that even patients >65 years should be evaluated as candidates for ASCT. An individualized approach supported by a frailty/geriatric assessment score could assist clinicians to select the appropriate treatment for each patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Afram
- Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of MedicineHuddinge, Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden,Department of HematologyKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden,Pfizer ABSollentunaSweden
| | - Roza Chaireti
- Department of HematologyKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden,Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Katarina Uttervall
- Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of MedicineHuddinge, Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden,Department of HematologyKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Vincent Luong
- Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of MedicineHuddinge, Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden,Department of HematologyKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Johan Lund
- Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of MedicineHuddinge, Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Muhammad Kashif
- Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of MedicineHuddinge, Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Gösta Gahrton
- Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of MedicineHuddinge, Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Evren Alici
- Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of MedicineHuddinge, Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden,Department of HematologyKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Hareth Nahi
- Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Department of MedicineHuddinge, Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Radiomics Models Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prediction of the Response to Bortezomib-Based Therapy in Patients with Multiple Myeloma. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2022; 2022:6911246. [PMID: 36105939 PMCID: PMC9467708 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6911246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose. To identify significant radiomics features based on MRI and establish effective models for predicting the response to bortezomib-based regimens. Materials and Methods. In total, 95 MM patients treated with bortezomib-based therapy were enrolled, including 77 with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (BCD) and 18 with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD). Based on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and T2-weighted imaging with fat suppression (T2WI-fs), radiomics features were extracted and then selected. The random forest (RF),
-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, logistic regression, decision tree, and Bayes models were built using the selected features. The predictive power of six models for response to BCD and VRD regimens were evaluated. The correlation between the selected features and progression-free survival (PFS) was also analyzed. Results. Four wavelet features were correlated with BCD treatment response. The six models all showed predictive power for BCD regimen (AUC: 0.84-0.896 in the training set, 0.801-0.885 in the validation set), and RF performed relatively better than others. Nevertheless, all the BCD-based models were incapable of predicting the VRD treatment response. The wavelet-HLH_firstorder_kurtosis was also associated with PFS (log-rank
). Conclusion. The four wavelet features were valuable biomarkers for predicting the response to BCD regimen. The six models based on these features showed predictive power, and RF was the best. One wavelet feature was also a survival-related biomarker. MRI-based radiomics had the potential to guide clinicians in MM management.
Collapse
|
7
|
Impact of Induction with VCD vs. VRD on the Outcome of Patients with Multiple Myeloma After an Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Transplant Cell Ther 2022; 28:307.e1-307.e8. [PMID: 35331973 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND nduction therapy with a triplet regimen, followed by high-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) is the standard of care for newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Bortezomib-dexamethasone with cyclophosphamide (VCD) or lenalidomide (VRD) are the most used induction regimens. However, previous studies comparing VCD and VRD showed disparate results. OBJECTIVES The goal of this retrospective study was to compare the "real world" results of VCD and VRD, in transplant-eligible MM patients outside of a clinical trial. METHODS/RESULTS We identified 322 patients who received VRD or VCD induction before auto-HCT at our institution. All patients received melphalan conditioning and single-agent lenalidomide maintenance therapy. Overall, 114 patients received VCD and 208 received VRD. The median age at auto-HCT was 61.9 years (range, 33.9-79.6), with 35.4% (114/322) of the cohort being 65 years or older. The overall response rate was 99.7% post-auto-HCT, with a significantly lower complete remission rate as the final response in the VCD compared to the VRD group (34% vs. 53%, p=0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the best response rate of VGPR or better in the VCD compared to the VRD group (92% vs. 85%, p=0.078). The median duration of ≥VGPR was 50.0 months (95%CI: 42.0-69.1) for both cohorts and there was no difference between VCD and VRD (p=0.769; HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.69-1.31). Median follow-up of survivors was 73 months. There was no difference in the relapse rate between VCD and VRD (p=0.749). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 48.7 months in the VCD and 44.6 months in the VRD group (p=0.858). Median overall survival (OS) was 103.8 months with VCD and 101.7 months with VRD (p=0.891). At 5 years, the PFS and OS were 38.1% and 76.9% for the VCD group, respectively, and 40.7% and 74.6% for the VRD group, respectively. On multivariate analysis for OS in the entire cohort, R-ISS I and post-auto-HCT best response of stringent complete response (sCR)/CR emerged as significant predictors of superior OS. There was no impact of the type of induction regimen on the OS in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Induction therapy with VCD compared to VRD was associated with a lower CR rate, but there was no difference in PFS or OS between the two regimens.
Collapse
|
8
|
Sidana S, Kumar S, Fraser R, Estrada-Merly N, Giralt S, Agrawal V, Anderson LD, Aljurf M, Banerjee R, Bashey A, Battiwalla M, Beitinjaneh A, Chakraborty R, Chhabra S, Dhakal B, Dholaria B, Hashmi S, Janakiram M, Lee C, Lekakis L, Murthy HS, Parrondo R, Wangjam T, Usmani S, Shah N, Qazilbash M, D’Souza A. Impact of Induction Therapy with VRD versus VCD on Outcomes in Patients with Multiple Myeloma in Partial Response or Better Undergoing Upfront Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation. Transplant Cell Ther 2022; 28:83.e1-83.e9. [PMID: 34781066 PMCID: PMC8900987 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Bortezomib-based triplet regimens-specifically bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) and bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (VCD)-are the 2 most common induction regimens used in transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), with conflicting data on comparative efficacy and outcomes in this population. We compared long-term outcomes of patients with NDMM receiving VRD induction and those receiving VCD induction prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Patients registered with the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry were included if they had undergone ASCT for MM within 6 months of diagnosis between January 2013 and December 2018, received VRD or VCD induction, and achieved a pretransplantation partial or better response. Of 1135 patients, 914 received VRD and 221 received VCD. The patients receiving VCD were more likely to have renal impairment and International Staging System (ISS) stage III disease and less likely to receive full-dose melphalan (200 mg/m2) conditioning (69% versus 80%; P < .001). Very good partial response rates pretransplantation, post-transplantation, and at best response were not significantly different in the 2 groups. Maintenance use was more common after VRD induction (88% versus 76%; P < .001), with lenalidomide the most common agent (80% versus 63%). Patients in the VRD group had a higher rate of renal recovery (74% versus 43%; P < .001), possibly due to a rapid reduction of light chains in the VRD group or improvement in renal function with VCD, which allowed a switch over to VRD, as patients who switched were classified in the VRD group. Patients receiving VRD had better survival on univariate analysis, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) from transplantation of 44.6 months versus 34.1 months (P = .004) and median 5-year overall survival (OS) of 79% versus 60% (P < .001). Multivariate analysis showed no significant survival difference, with a hazard ratio for VCD versus VRD induction of 1.22 (95% CI, 0.96 to 1.55; P = .10) for PFS and 1.33 (95% CI, 0.93 to 1.92, P = .12) for OS. Maintenance use was independently associated with superior PFS and OS, along with ISS stage, cytogenetics, and pretransplantation response (PFS only). In patients with MM undergoing upfront ASCT after VRD or VCD induction, no independent survival difference was seen based on the induction therapy received after adjusting for other prognostic factors. The use of maintenance treatment was uniformly associated with superior outcomes. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Raphael Fraser
- CIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI,Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Health and Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Noel Estrada-Merly
- CIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Sergio Giralt
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Vaibhav Agrawal
- Division of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Larry D. Anderson
- Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Mahmoud Aljurf
- Department of Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital Center & Research, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rahul Banerjee
- Division of Hematology-Oncology; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Asad Bashey
- Blood and Marrow Transplant Program at the Northside Hospital, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Amer Beitinjaneh
- Division of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| | - Rajshekhar Chakraborty
- Multiple Myeloma and Amyloidosis Service, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Saurabh Chhabra
- CIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | - Binod Dhakal
- BMT and Cellular Therapy, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| | | | - Shahrukh Hashmi
- 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, MN,Department of Medicine, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Murali Janakiram
- University of Minnesota, Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Cindy Lee
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | - Hemant S. Murthy
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Ricardo Parrondo
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | | | - Saad Usmani
- Department of Hematologic Oncology & Blood Disorders Levine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC
| | - Nina Shah
- Division of Hematology-Oncology; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Anita D’Souza
- CIBMTR® (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ning X, Wei X, Guo X, Wei Q, Huang F, Fan Z, Xu N, Sun J, Feng R, Liu Q, Wei Y. [Autologous stem cell transplantation improves outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma receiving proteasome inhibitors and lenalidomide treatment]. NAN FANG YI KE DA XUE XUE BAO = JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY 2021; 41:1420-1425. [PMID: 34658359 DOI: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2021.09.19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) on treatment response and survival outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) receiving treatments with proteasome inhibitors and lenalidomide. METHODS We retrospectively collected the clinical data of newly diagnosed MM patients, who were eligible for ASCT and received proteasome inhibitors or lenalidomide-based treatment in our hospital from January, 2015 to December, 2019. The patients were divided into transplantation group and non-transplantation group, and in transplantation group, the patients received 4 to 6 courses of induction therapy with proteasome inhibitors or lenalidomide before ASCT, while those in the non-transplantation group received more than 8 courses of induction and consolidation therapy with proteasome inhibitors or lenalidomide-based regimens. The therapeutic efficacy and survival outcomes of the patinets were compared between the two groups. RESULTS A total of 105 patients were enrolled in the study, including 48 (45.7%) in transplantation group and 57 (54.3%) in non-transplantation group. The two groups were matched for gender, age and treatment response after 4 courses of induction therapy (P > 0.05). The rate of optimal response before relapse differed significantly between the two groups (P=0.000), and the patients receiving ASCT had significantly higher rates of complete response (85.4% vs 54.4%, P= 0.001) and very good partial response or better (95.8% vs 73.7%, P=0.002) than those without ASCT. At the end of follow-up, the median progression-free survival in the transplantation group was not reached, as compared with 29 months in the nontransplantation group (P=0.013). The median overall survival (OS) in the two groups was not reached, but the OS was better in the transplant group than in the non-transplant group (P=0.022). CONCLUSION ASCT can further improve the depth of remission and survival outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed MM receiving treatments with proteasome inhibitors and lenalidomide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Ning
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - X Wei
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - X Guo
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Q Wei
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - F Huang
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Z Fan
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - N Xu
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - J Sun
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - R Feng
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Q Liu
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| | - Y Wei
- Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Derman BA, Kosuri S, Jakubowiak A. Knowing the unknowns in high risk multiple myeloma. Blood Rev 2021; 51:100887. [PMID: 34479756 DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2021.100887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
High risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) continues to portend worse outcomes despite the many advances in anti-myeloma therapeutics. The optimal approach to treatment is not clearly defined on account of the variable definitions of HRMM and the paucity of studies dedicated to the treatment of HRMM. In this review, we use a case-based approach to review the definitions of HRMM, and evaluate the evidence for induction, stem cell transplantation, and post-transplant therapy approaches for HRMM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A Derman
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
| | - Satyajit Kosuri
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Andrzej Jakubowiak
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Treatment of Multiple Myeloma and the Role of Melphalan in the Era of Modern Therapies-Current Research and Clinical Approaches. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10091841. [PMID: 33922721 PMCID: PMC8123041 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10091841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) accounts for 10% of all hematological malignancies, and it is the second most common hematological neoplasm for which chemotherapy is an important pharmacological treatment. High dose melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplantation remains the standard of treatment for transplant-eligible patients with MM. In this review, we describe aspects of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melphalan therapy and related compounds. In addition, we describe the use of melphalan in innovative therapies for the treatment of MM, including the development of drug carriers to reduce systemic toxicity, combination therapy to improve the effectiveness of cancer therapy, and the chemical modification of the melphalan molecule to improve antitumor activity.
Collapse
|
12
|
Rampotas A, Djebbari F, Panitsas F, Lees C, Tsagkaraki I, Gomes AR, Prideaux S, Chen L, Prodger C, Khera A, Gray N, Ellis L, Sangha G, Lim WY, Eyre TA, Moore S, Ramasamy K, Kothari J. Efficacy and tolerability of VCD chemotherapy in a UK real-world dataset of elderly transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed myeloma patients. Eur J Haematol 2021; 106:563-573. [PMID: 33496996 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There are limited data on the efficacy and tolerability of VCD chemotherapy in transplant-non-eligible (TNE) newly diagnosed myeloma (NDMM) patients. In this retrospective study, we set out to evaluate this triplet combination in this setting across Thames Valley Cancer Network (UK). METHODS The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary outcomes included event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS In a total cohort of 158 patients, ORR for total cohort was 72.1%. Median EFS was 10.5 months, and for subgroups by age (<75:11.7 vs ≥75:10.3 months, P = .124), by Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI) (<5:11.1 vs ≥5:8.2 months, P = .345). The 4-month landmark analysis showed the following median EFS results: by cumulative bortezomib dose (≥26 mg/m2 : 9.0 months vs <26 mg/m2 : 6.4, P = .13), by cumulative cyclophosphamide dose (≥7000 mg: 9.2 vs <7000 mg: 7.0 months, P = .02) and by cumulative dexamethasone dose (>600 mg: 7.8 vs ≤600 mg: 8.3 months, P = .665). Median OS was 46.9 months. The incidence rate of AE was as follows: any grade (76.8%), ≥G3 (27.1%), ≥G3 haematological AEs (7.9%), any grade infections (31.1%) and ≥G3 infections (11.9%). CONCLUSION This study demonstrated a good ORR achieved from fixed duration VCD, which was reasonably well tolerated. This was followed by modest median EFS. We envisage that the latter may be improved in this patient group with the use of a higher cumulative bortezomib dose (≥26 mg/m2 ) which showed a trend for improved EFS although without statistical significance (P = .13), and with the use of a higher cumulative cyclophosphamide doses (≥7000 mg, P = .02), subject to tolerability and close monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandros Rampotas
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.,Oxford University Clinical Academic Graduate School, Oxford, UK
| | - Faouzi Djebbari
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Fotios Panitsas
- Department of Haematology, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | - Ana Rita Gomes
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Steve Prideaux
- Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon, UK
| | - Lucia Chen
- Milton Keynes University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Milton Keynes, UK
| | - Catherine Prodger
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Akhil Khera
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Lauren Ellis
- Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley, UK
| | - Gavinda Sangha
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Wen Yuen Lim
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Toby A Eyre
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Sally Moore
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Karthik Ramasamy
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Jaimal Kothari
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Afram G, Susek KH, Uttervall K, Wersäll JD, Wagner AK, Luong V, Lund J, Gahrton G, Alici E, Nahi H. Improved survival in multiple Myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation is entirely in the standard cytogenetic risk groups. Eur J Haematol 2021; 106:546-554. [PMID: 33471414 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2020] [Revised: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Novel drugs and drug combinations have improved outcomes for multiple myeloma patients. However, subgroups of patients still have a poor progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In an attempt to identify how the novel drugs affect the outcome in standard-risk and high-risk patients, respectively, we have investigated 715 multiple myeloma (MM) patients who have undergone high dose treatment followed by autologous stem cell transplantation at our center during 1995 - 2020. Outcomes during three time periods, 1995-1999 (period I), 2000-2009 (period II), and 2010-2020 (period III), were compared separately for standard-risk and high-risk patients. Risk stratification was based on chromosome analysis for periods II and III. RESULTS The whole cohort of patients showed significantly improved OS with time during the three periods being at a median of 5.8, 7.0, and 10.0 years, respectively. There is also a weak tendency for improved PFS, that is, a median of 2.4, 2.6, and 2.9 years, respectively, during the same periods. However, the separate analysis of standard-risk and high-risk patients showed that the overall improvement with time was due to improved standard-risk patients (median OS 8.4 years for the period I and not reached for period II and III). In contrast, no significant improvement was seen in high-risk patients. For patients with del17p, PFS was even worse during period III as compared to period II (median 1.6 vs 3.2 years respectively). CONCLUSION Our results show that the dramatic improvement in outcome for MM patients during the last 20 years only applies for standard-risk patients, while high-risk MM patients still are doing poorly, indicating that the novel drugs developed during this time are preferentially effective in standard-risk patients. New treatment modalities like CAR-T cells, CAR-NK cells, and/or bispecific antibodies should be tried in clinical studies early in the course of the disease, especially in patients with high-risk cytogenetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Afram
- Department of Medicine, Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Haematology Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Katharina Helene Susek
- Department of Medicine, Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Katarina Uttervall
- Department of Medicine, Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Haematology Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johanna Dehlsen Wersäll
- Department of Medicine, Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Arnika Kathleen Wagner
- Department of Medicine, Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Haematology Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Vincent Luong
- Department of Medicine, Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Haematology Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johan Lund
- Department of Medicine, Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gösta Gahrton
- Department of Medicine, Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Evren Alici
- Department of Medicine, Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Haematology Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hareth Nahi
- Department of Medicine, Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Haematology Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|