B-cell frequencies and immunoregulatory phenotypes in myeloproliferative neoplasms: Influence of ruxolitinib, interferon-α2, or combination treatment

Association of JAK2V617F allele burden and clinical correlates in polycythemia vera: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) V617F mutation is present in most patients with polycythemia vera (PV). One persistently puzzling aspect unresolved is the association between JAK2V617F allele burden (also known as variant allele frequency) and the relevant clinical characteristics. Numerous studies have reported associations between allele burden and both hematologic and clinical features. While there are strong indications linking high allele burden in PV patients with symptoms and clinical characteristics, not all associations are definitive, and disparate and contradictory findings have been reported. Hence, this study aimed to synthesize existing data from the literature to better understand the association between JAK2V617F allele burden and relevant clinical correlates. Out of the 1,851 studies identified, 39 studies provided evidence related to the association between JAK2V617F allele burden and clinical correlates, and 21 studies were included in meta-analyses. Meta-analyses of correlation demonstrated that leucocyte and erythrocyte counts were significantly and positively correlated with JAK2V617F allele burden, whereas platelet count was not. Meta-analyses of standardized mean difference demonstrated that leucocyte and hematocrit were significantly higher in patients with higher JAK2V617F allele burden, whereas platelet count was significantly lower. Meta-analyses of odds ratio demonstrated that patients who had higher JAK2V617F allele burden had a significantly greater odds ratio for developing pruritus, splenomegaly, thrombosis, myelofibrosis, and acute myeloid leukemia. Our study integrates data from approximately 5,462 patients, contributing insights into the association between JAK2V617F allele burden and various hematological parameters, symptomatic manifestations, and complications. However, varied methods of data presentation and statistical analyses prevented the execution of high-quality meta-analyses.

Analysis of the Clinical Significance and Safety of Interferon in the Treatment of Chronic Myeloproliferative Tumors

Objective

To investigate the clinical significance and safety of interferon in the treatment of chronic myeloproliferative tumors (MPN).

Methods

In this prospective study, a total of 120 patients with advanced chronic MPN admitted to our hospital between April 2016 and August 2020 were assessed for eligibility and recruited, including 62 patients with JAK2V617F mutation-positive ET (ET group) and 58 patients with JAK2V617F mutation-positive PV (PV group). 62 patients with JAK2V617F mutation-positive ET were assigned (1 : 1) to receive interferon-α (IFN-α) or hydroxyurea (HU). A similar subgrouping method for treatment of IFN-α and HU was introduced to patients with JAK2V617F mutation-positive PV. Outcome measures included efficacy and adverse reactions.

Results

For patients with JAK2V617F mutation-positive ET and PV, there were no significant differences in the overall response rate between the groups treated with IFN-α or HU (P > 0.05); however, the patients treated with IFN-α had a significantly higher 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) than those treated with HU (P < 0.05). IFN-α was associated with a significantly lower incidence of disease progression, thrombotic events, splenomegaly, myelofibrosis, nausea, and vomiting and a higher incidence of hematological adverse reactions and flu-like symptoms versus HU (P < 0.05). After six months of treatment, the PV group had 12 cases of hematological response both in the IFN-α subgroup and the HU subgroup and fewer PV patients treated with IFN-α required phlebotomy versus those treated with HU (P < 0.05), in which 4 patients in the IFN-α subgroup had no hematological response and 6 patients in the HU subgroup had no hematological response. There was no significant difference in the number of cases with phlebotomy between the two subgroups of PV patients without hematological response (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The use of IFN in the treatment of JAK2V617F mutation-positive ET and PV patients yields a prominent clinical effect by prolonging PFS and avoiding phlebotomy for JAK2V617F mutation-positive PV patients.

Untwining Anti-Tumor and Immunosuppressive Effects of JAK Inhibitors-A Strategy for Hematological Malignancies?

Simple Summary

The Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway is aberrantly activated in many malignancies. Inhibition of this pathway via JAK inhibitors (JAKinibs) is therefore an attractive therapeutic strategy underlined by Ruxolitinib (JAK1/2 inhibitor) being approved for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms. As a consequence of the crucial role of the JAK-STAT pathway in the regulation of immune responses, inhibition of JAKs suppresses the immune system. This review article provides a thorough overview of the current knowledge on JAKinibs’ effects on immune cells in the context of hematological malignancies. We also discuss the potential use of JAKinibs for the treatment of diseases in which lymphocytes are the source of the malignancy.

Abstract

The Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway propagates signals from a variety of cytokines, contributing to cellular responses in health and disease. Gain of function mutations in JAKs or STATs are associated with malignancies, with JAK2^V617F being the main driver mutation in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Therefore, inhibition of this pathway is an attractive therapeutic strategy for different types of cancer. Numerous JAK inhibitors (JAKinibs) have entered clinical trials, including the JAK1/2 inhibitor Ruxolitinib approved for the treatment of MPN. Importantly, loss of function mutations in JAK-STAT members are a cause of immune suppression or deficiencies. MPN patients undergoing Ruxolitinib treatment are more susceptible to infections and secondary malignancies. This highlights the suppressive effects of JAKinibs on immune responses, which renders them successful in the treatment of autoimmune diseases but potentially detrimental for cancer patients. Here, we review the current knowledge on the effects of JAKinibs on immune cells in the context of hematological malignancies. Furthermore, we discuss the potential use of JAKinibs for the treatment of diseases in which lymphocytes are the source of malignancies. In summary, this review underlines the necessity of a robust immune profiling to provide the best benefit for JAKinib-treated patients.

Risk of infections in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms-a population-based cohort study of 8363 patients

Infections are a common complication in patients with many hematologic malignancies, however, whether patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) also are at an increased risk of infections is largely unknown. To assess the risk of serious infections, we performed a large population-based matched cohort study in Sweden including 8 363 MPN patients and 32,405 controls using high-quality registers between the years 1992-2013 with follow-up until 2015. The hazard ratio (HR) of any infection was 2.0 (95% confidence interval 1.9-2.0), of bacterial infections 1.9 (1.8-2.0), and of viral infections 2.1 (1.9-2.3). One of the largest risk increases was that of sepsis, HR 2.6 (2.4-2.9). The HR of any infection was highest in primary myelofibrosis 3.7 (3.2-4.1), and significantly elevated in all MPN subtypes; 1.7 (1.6-1.8) in polycythemia vera and 1.7 (1.5-1.8) in essential thrombocythemia. There was no significant difference in risk of infections between untreated patients and patients treated with hydroxyurea or interferon-α during the years 2006-2013. These novel findings of an overall increased risk of infections in MPN patients, irrespective of common cytoreductive treatments, suggest the increased risk of infection is inherent to the MPN.

Novel and combination therapies for polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: the dawn of a new era

INTRODUCTION

Essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) belong to the BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms and are characterized by the clonal proliferation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. The contribution of aberrant immune regulation within the bone marrow microenvironment to ET and PV pathogenesis as well as the underlying molecular landscape is becoming increasingly understood.

AREAS COVERED

Authors searched PubMed and conference abstracts in August 2020 for preclinical and clinical studies to provide an overview of the immune pathobiology in ET and PV and the rationale for several novel agents. A discussion of recent clinical trials on interferon and ruxolitinib in ET and PV patients is provided followed by an outline of the future challenges in the field particularly for novel therapeutics and an increasingly individualized, molecularly driven approach to treatment selection. Several novel agents are currently being actively evaluated and are reviewed herein as well.

EXPERT OPINION

While hydroxyurea remains the first-line treatment for cytoreduction in most high-risk ET and PV patients, the disease-modifying potential of IFN is promising and could make it a preferred option for selected patients. Advances in molecular testing will enable a more individualized approach to prognostication and treatment selection.

Heat Shock Proteins and PD-1/PD-L1 as Potential Therapeutic Targets in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Simple Summary

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), which are a heterogeneous group of rare disorders that affect blood cell production in bone marrow, present many significant challenges for clinicians. Though considerable progress has been made, in particular with the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib, more effective alternative therapeutic approaches are needed. In the search for new and more efficient therapies, heat shock proteins, also known as stress proteins, and the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint axis have been found to be of great interest in hematologic malignancies. Here, we review the therapeutic potential of stress protein inhibitors in the management of patients diagnosed with MPN and summarize the accumulating evidence of the role of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in MPN in order to provide perspectives on future therapeutic opportunities relative to the inhibition of these targets.

Abstract

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a group of clonal disorders that affect hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. These disorders are often caused by oncogenic driver mutations associated with persistent Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling. While JAK inhibitors, such as ruxolitinib, reduce MPN-related symptoms in myelofibrosis, they do not influence the underlying cause of the disease and are not curative. Due to these limitations, there is a need for alternative therapeutic strategies and targets. Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are cytoprotective stress-response chaperones involved in protein homeostasis and in many critical pathways, including inflammation. Over the last decade, several research teams have unraveled the mechanistic connection between STAT signaling and several HSPs, showing that HSPs are potential therapeutic targets for MPN. These HSPs include HSP70, HSP90 (chaperoning JAK2) and both HSP110 and HSP27, which are key factors modulating STAT3 phosphorylation status. Like the HSPs, the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling pathway has been widely studied in cancer, but the importance of PD-L1-mediated immune escape in MPN was only recently reported. In this review, we summarize the role of HSPs and PD-1/PD-L1 signaling, the modalities of their experimental blockade, and the effect in MPN. Finally, we discuss the potential of these emerging targeted approaches in MPN therapy.