Outcome and characteristics of non‐measurable myeloma: A cohort study with population‐based data from the Swedish Myeloma Registry

A case report: Nonsecretory multiple myeloma presenting with bone pain

RATIONALE

Nonsecretory multiple myeloma (NSMM) is a rare subtype of multiple myelom, occurring in 1% to 2% of multiple myelom and characterized by the inability of clonal plasma cells to synthesize or secrete immunoglobulins. We describe a 71-year-old male patient who began with bone pain and was referred to hospital several times, but was not properly diagnosed and effectively treated.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 71-year-old male patient visited our hematology department, complaining of lumbago for 1 year and back pain for half a year.

DIAGNOSES

Low-dose whole-body bone computed tomography: multiple bone destruction of the sternum, ribs, multiple vertebrae and accessories of the spine, pelvis, bilateral humerus, and proximal femur. Monoclonal plasma cells accounted for 17.5% of nuclear cells in bone marrow puncture smear. Fluorescence in situ hybridization detected amplification of CKS1B (1q21) gene. Immunofixation electrophoresis negative. About 10.72% of monoclonal plasma cells were detected by flow cytometry. Finally, he was diagnosed with NSMM.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients received VCD chemotherapy (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2, d1, d4, d8, d11; cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2, d1-2, d8-9; dexamethasone sodium phosphate 20 mg, d1-2, d4-5, d8-9, d11-12, once every 21 days).

OUTCOMES

After 2 cycles of VCD treatment, the symptoms of bone pain were significantly relieved, and the efficacy was evaluated as partial response. Follow-up chemotherapy will continue to be completed on schedule. We will continue to follow up to further evaluate the overall survival and progression-free survival.

LESSONS

This case shows that NSMM is easily missed or misdiagnosed.

Outcome and characteristics of nonsecretory multiple myeloma compared with secretory multiple myeloma: a retrospective multicenter study from China

BACKGROUND

Nonsecretory multiple myeloma (NSMM) is a rare type of multiple myeloma (MM). Few studies have described the clinical features and outcomes of NSMM in novel agents. Additionally, the prognostic characteristics have remained controversial in recent years.

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical and prognostic features of NSMM and explore the prognostic value of involved free light chain (FLC) levels in NSMM patients in the Chinese population.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 176 newly diagnosed NSMM cases between January 2005 and December 2021 from 19 clinical centers in China. The control group was selected using a 1:4 propensity score matching technique of newly diagnosed secretory MM, with age, sex and diagnosis time as the matching variables.

RESULTS

The median age of NSMM patients was 60 years, and 22.6% of patients were classified as ISS stage 3. The ORR of the NSMM patients was 87.4%, and the CR was 65.8%. Compared to the matched secretory MM patients, more NSMM patients achieved CR after first-line treatment (65.8% vs. 36%, p = 0.000). The ORR of first-line treatment was not significantly different between NSMM and secretory MM (89.45% vs. 84.7%, p = 0.196). The first-line PFS was 27.5 m and 23 m (p = 0.063), and the median OS was 81 m and 70 months (p = 0.401). However, for CR-achieved NSMM and CR-not-achieved NSMM patients, the median PFS was 37 m vs. 16 m (p = 0.021), while the median OS showed no difference (107 m vs. 87 m, p = 0.290). In multivariate analysis, the significant factors for PFS were age ≥ 65 and ISS-3. ISS-3 was the only independent prognostic factor of OS. The iFLC ≥ 50 mg/L group had a high ORR of 97.3%, and the median PFS and OS were 48 m and NR, respectively. Compared to the matched secretory MM, the iFLC ≥ 50 mg/L group also showed more CR and longer OS (NR vs. 70 m, p = 0.006) and PFS (48 m vs. 23 m, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results revealed that Chinese NSMM patients are younger and have a higher CR but not superior survival. The subgroup of NSMM patients with iFLC ≥ 50 mg/L had better outcomes than secretory MM.

Regional differences in treatment and outcome for myeloma patients in Sweden: A population based Swedish myeloma register study

BACKGROUND

We wanted to evaluate if health care for multiple myeloma (MM) patients is equal in different regions of Sweden.

AIM

To study differences in survival for MM depending on health care region and early use of modern treatment.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from the Swedish Myeloma Register from patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2017 was used. Cohorts were defined by the six healthcare regions (labeled A-F) in Sweden and modern initial treatment was defined as including certain drug combinations. To adjust for time to treatment bias, survival analyses were performed also for patients alive 6 months after diagnosis. In all treated MM patients (n = 5326), we observed a superior overall survival (OS) for region A compared to all other regions (p < .01 for all respectively). After adjusting for time to treatment there was also a superior survival in the region with highest use of modern initial treatment (region A) compared to the regions defined in the study as having intermediate and low use (p < .01 for both). In patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) a superior survival was observed for region A compared to all regions besides region B. Similar results were seen when adjusting for a time to treatment bias. In patients not receiving ASCT, 75 years or older and adjusted for time to treatment bias, a difference was noted only between region A and E (log rank p = .04, HR 1.2, CI 1.00-1.44, p = .06). In multivariate analyses including age, international staging system stage and time period of diagnosis, differences in survival remained for patients receiving ASCT between region A versus C, D, E and F (p = .01, p < .01, p < .01, p = .03).

CONCLUSION

We observed a superior survival in region A for patients receiving ASCT. Explanations may be higher usage of modern initial treatment or regional residual confounding. For patients not receiving ASCT, 75 years or older, differences in survival could be adjusted for.

Outcome data from >10 000 multiple myeloma patients in the Danish and Swedish national registries

OBJECTIVE

We describe real-world evidence (RWE) from the nationwide Swedish and Danish registries that provide important information on incidence and outcome in multiple myeloma (MM).

METHOD

First line treatment data on more than 10.000 MM patients from Denmark and Sweden between 2005-2018 are presented. Key results from research conducted within the Swedish and Danish myeloma registries are summarized, describing subgroups of patients with comorbidity, myeloma complications, and early relapse.

RESULTS

We show that national guidelines, generated on results from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are rapidly implemented and improve overall survival (OS). We find that both the incidence of MM and the median age at diagnosis is higher in national registries compared to results from referral centres, indicating a more complete coverage. This highlights the need of validation of prognostic scoring systems and indices in e.g., SMM and high-risk MM in a real- world-population. We show that these subgroups are unlikely to be captured in RCTs with narrow inclusion and exclusion criteria, that they have worse survival, and are in need of new treatment approaches.

CONCLUSION

National registries that include all MM patients are an important source of knowledge on epidemiology, treatment and outcome with implications for the planning of MM care. Despite the introduction of new and better treatments, rapidly implemented in our countries, our registries uncover subgroups of patients that still have inferior outcome. Our RWE can help to identify important research questions to be studied in further clinical trials also in patients currently not included in RCTs.

IgD Subtype But Not IgM or Non-Secretory Is a Prognostic Marker for Poor Survival Following Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma. Results From the EBMT CALM (Collaboration to Collect Autologous Transplant Outcomes in Lymphomas and Myeloma) Study

BACKGROUND

The Collaboration to Collect Autologous Transplant Outcomes in Lymphoma and Myeloma (CALM) study has provided an opportunity to evaluate the real-world outcomes of patients with myeloma. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome according to the different subtypes of myeloma using CALM data.

PATIENTS

This study compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and complete remission (CR) and the impact of novel versus non-novel drug containing induction regimens prior to autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) of 2802 patients with "usual" and "rare" myelomas.

RESULTS

Our data suggest that IgM and non-secretory myeloma have superior PFS and OS compared with IgD myeloma and outcomes comparable to those for usual myeloma. Patients who received novel agent induction had higher rates of CR prior to transplant. Non-novel induction regimens were associated with inferior PFS but no difference in OS. Although not the primary focus of this study, we show that poor mobilization status is associated with reduced PFS and OS, but these differences disappear in multivariate analysis suggesting that poor mobilization status is a surrogate for other indicators of poor prognosis.

CONCLUSION

We confirm that IgD myeloma is associated with the worst prognosis and inferior outcomes compared with the other isotypes.