Combination of myeloproliferative neoplasm driver gene activation with mutations of splice factor or epigenetic modifier genes increases risk of rapid blastic progression

Research progress of additional pathogenic mutations in chronic neutrophilic leukemia

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) is a rare type of myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN). Due to its nonspecific clinical symptoms and lack of specific molecular markers, it was previously difficult to distinguish it from other diseases with increased neutrophils. However, the discovery of the CSF3R mutation in CNL 10 years ago and the update of the diagnostic criteria by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2016 brought CNL into a new era of molecular diagnosis. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology has led to the identification of numerous mutant genes in CNL. While CSF3R is commonly recognized as the driver mutation of CNL, other mutations have also been detected in CNL using NGS, including mutations in other signaling pathway genes (CBL, JAK2, NARS, PTPN11) and chromatin modification genes (ASXL1, SETBP1, EZH2), DNA methylation genes (DNMT3A, TET2), myeloid-related transcription factor genes (RUNX1, GATA2), and splicing and RNA metabolism genes (SRSF2, U2AF1). The coexistence of these mutated genes and CSF3R mutations, as well as the different evolutionary sequences of clones, deepens the complexity of CNL molecular biology. The purpose of this review is to summarize the genetic research findings of CNL in the last decade, focusing on the common mutated genes in CNL and their clinical significance, as well as the clonal evolution pattern and sequence of mutation acquisition in CNL, to provide a basis for the appropriate management of CNL patients.

Cytogenetics and genomics in CML and other myeloproliferative neoplasms

Chronic myeloid leukemia is defined by the presence of the Philadelphia translocation t (9; 22) resulting in the BCR::ABL1 fusion. The other myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) subtypes also carry typical chromosomal abnormalities, which however are not pathognomonic for a specific entity of MPN. According to the WHO classification the distinction between these entities is still based on the integration of cytological, histopathological and molecular findings. Progression of CML into accelerated and blastic phase is usually driven by additional chromosome abnormalities and ABL1 kinase mutations. In the other MPN subtypes the additional mutations besides driver gene mutations in JAK2, MPL and CALR have a decisive impact on the propensity for progression. In addition, the sequence in which the driver mutations and risk conveying additional mutations have been acquired appears to play an important role. Here, we review cytogenetic and molecular changes in CML and MPN that should be evaluated during diagnosis and disease monitoring.

Genomic alterations in blast phase of BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms

The blast phase of BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN-BP) represents the final stage of the disease, which is complicated by complex genomic alterations. These alterations result from sequence changes in genetic material (DNA, RNA) and can lead to either a gain or loss of function of encoded proteins, such as adaptor proteins, enzymes, components of spliceosomes, cell cycle checkpoints regulators, transcription factors, or proteins in cell signaling pathways. Interference at various levels, including transcription, translation, and post-translational modification (such as methylation, dephosphorylation, or acetylation), can contribute to these alterations. Mutated genes such as ASXL1, EZH2, IDH1, IDH2, TET2, SRSF2, U2AF1, TP53, NRAS, KRAS, PTPN11, SH2B3/LNK, and RUNX1 play active roles at different stages of genetic material expression, modification, and protein function manipulation in MPNs. These mutations are also correlated with, and can contribute to, the progression of MPN-BP. In this review, we summarize their common mutational profiles, functions, and associations with progression of MPN-BP.

High molecular risk variants, severe thrombocytopenia and large unstained cells count affect the outcome in primary myelofibrosis

Apart from the driver mutations, high molecular risk (HMR) variants and other factors have been reported to influence the prognosis of primary myelofibrosis (PMF). The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of laboratory and molecular characteristics at the time of diagnosis (TOD) on the PMF outcome. The study group consisted of 82 patients recruited from three Polish university centers. Among the driver mutations, only CALR type 1 positively influenced the overall survival (OS). The risk of progression to accelerated or blastic disease phase (AP/BP) did not depend on the driver mutation type, but was closely associated with the presence of HMR variants (p = 0.0062). The risk of death (ROD) was higher in patients with HMR variants (OR[95%CI] = 4.33[1.52;12.34], p = 0.0044) and in patients with a platelet count at the TOD between 50-100 G/L (HR[95%CI] = 2.66[1.11;6.35]) and < 50 G/L (HR[95%CI] = 8.44[2.50;28.44]). Median survival time was 7.8, 2.2 and 1.4 years in patients with large unstained cells (LUC) count of [0.0-0.2], (0.2-0.4] and > 0.4 G/L at the TOD, respectively. We found an unexpected, hitherto undescribed, association between LUC count at the TOD and PMF prognosis. Our analysis led to the following conclusions: in PMF patients at the TOD 1) the presence of HMR variants, especially combined, is associated with an increased risk of progression to the AP and BP, and shorter OS, 2) severe thrombocytopenia confers worse prognosis than the moderate one, 3) LUC count is closely related with the disease phase, and associated with the ROD and OS.

The clinical relevance of broad mutational screening of myeloproliferative neoplasms at diagnosis

Introduction

Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) is a heterogenous group of hematological malignancies including polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). JAK2V617F is the most frequent driver mutation in all three entities, but in PMF and ET mutations in CALR and MPL are also frequent. Mutations seen in additional genes are also often the same regardless of subtype of MPN. The aim of this study was to analyze a population based MPN cohort for genetic variants with prognostic value that can guide clinical decisions.

Methods

MPN patients from Western Sweden diagnosed between 2008-2013 (n=248) were screened for mutations in 54 genes associated with myeloid malignancy.

Results

Mutations in the genes SRSF2 and U2AF1 correlated significantly with impaired overall survival but did not correlate to increased risk for vascular events, neither before nor after diagnosis. Rather, mutations in these genes showed an association with disease transformation. Several recurrent gene variants with allele frequency close to 50% were confirmed to be germline. However, none of these variants was found to have an earlier onset of MPN.

Discussion

In conclusion, we identified gene mutations to be independent markers of impaired survival in MPN. This indicates the need for more individualized assessment and treatment of MPN patients and a wider gene mutation screening already at diagnosis. This could ensure the identification of patients with high-risk mutations early on. In addition, several genetic variants were also identified as germline in this study but gave no obvious clinical relevance. To avoid conclusions from non-informative genetic variants, a simultaneous analysis of normal cell DNA from patients at diagnosis should be considered.

JAK2V617F variant allele frequency, non-driver mutations, single-nucleotide variants and polycythemia vera outcome

INTRODUCTION

Despite comparatively favourable prognosis in polycythemia vera (PV) patients (pts), the overall survival is shorter compared to the age-matched general population. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of chosen laboratory and genetic factors on the individual disease outcome, i.e. risk of thrombosis, myelofibrosis/blastic transformation and death.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study group consisted of 151 pts and 57 healthy donors (HD).

RESULTS

JAK2V617F mutation was found in 96.7% (146/151) of the studied pts. JAK2 exon 12 mutations were identified in 2 individuals. The coexistence of JAK2V617F and JAK2 exon 12 mutation was confirmed in 2 other pts. In one case, neither JAK2V617F nor JAK2 exon 12 mutation was found. The presence of ten different non-driver mutations (ASXL1, SRSF2, U2AF1, IDH2) in eight of the analyzed pts (5.3%) was confirmed. The overall frequency of thrombotic events (TE) in the studied PV group was 23.8% (36/151). In patients with TE, median platelet count was lower than in pts without TE. Thrombotic risk did not depend on JAK2 rs12343867, TERT rs2736100, OBFC1 rs9420907 SNV, however, we found a novel strong tendency towards statistical significance between the CC genotype miR-146a rs2431697 and thrombosis. The disease progression to fibrotic phase was confirmed in 9% of the pts. Fibrotic transformation in PV pts was affected mainly by JAK2V617F variant allele frequency (VAF) and the presence of coexisting non-driver variants. The high JAK2V617F VAF and elevated white blood cell (WBC) count at the time of diagnosis were associated with an increased risk of death.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, in our opinion, complex, laboratory and genetic PV pts evaluation at the time of diagnosis should be incorporated into a new prognostic scoring system to more precisely define the PV prognosis and to optimize the therapeutic decision-making process.

Association of Myelofibrosis Phenotypes with Clinical Manifestations, Molecular Profiles, and Treatments

Myelofibrosis (MF) presents an array of clinical manifestations and molecular profiles. The two distinct phenotypes- myeloproliferative and myelodepletive or cytopenic- are situated at the two poles of the disease spectrum and are largely defined by different degrees of cytopenias, splenomegaly, and distinct molecular profiles. The myeloproliferative phenotype is characterized by normal/higher peripheral blood counts or mildly decreased hemoglobin, progressive splenomegaly, and constitutional symptoms. The myeloproliferative phenotype is typically associated with secondary MF, higher JAK2 V617F burden, fewer mutations, and superior overall survival (OS). The myelodepletive phenotype is usually associated with primary MF, ≥2 cytopenias, modest splenomegaly, lower JAK2 V617F burden, higher fibrosis, greater genomic complexity, and inferior OS. Cytopenias are associated with mutations in epigenetic regulators/splicing factors, clonal evolution, disease progression, and shorter OS. Clinical variables, in conjunction with the molecular profiles, inform integrated prognostication and disease management. Ruxolitinib/fedratinib and pacritinib/momelotinib may be more suitable to treat patients with the myeloproliferative and myelodepletive phenotypes, respectively. Appreciation of MF heterogeneity and two distinct phenotypes, the different clinical manifestations and molecular profiles associated with each phenotype alongside the growing treatment expertise, the development of non-myelosuppressive JAK inhibitors, and integrated prognostication are leading to a new era in patient management. Physicians can increasingly tailor personalized treatments that will address the unique unmet needs of MF patients, including those presenting with the myelodepletive phenotype, to elicit optimal outcomes and extended OS across the disease spectrum.

Progression in Myeloid Neoplasms: Beyond the Myeloblast

Disease progression in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), myelodysplastic-myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN), and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), altogether referred to as myeloid neoplasms (MN), is a major source of mortality. Apart from transformation to acute myeloid leukemia, the clinical progression of MN is mostly due to the overgrowth of pre-existing hematopoiesis by the MN without an additional transforming event. Still, MN may evolve along other recurrent yet less well-known scenarios: (1) acquisition of MPN features in MDS or (2) MDS features in MPN, (3) progressive myelofibrosis (MF), (4) acquisition of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML)-like characteristics in MPN or MDS, (5) development of myeloid sarcoma (MS), (6) lymphoblastic (LB) transformation, (7) histiocytic/dendritic outgrowths. These MN-transformation types exhibit a propensity for extramedullary sites (e.g., skin, lymph nodes, liver), highlighting the importance of lesional biopsies in diagnosis. Gain of distinct mutations/mutational patterns seems to be causative or at least accompanying several of the above-mentioned scenarios. MDS developing MPN features often acquire MPN driver mutations (usually JAK2), and MF. Conversely, MPN gaining MDS features develop, e.g., ASXL1, IDH1/2, SF3B1, and/or SRSF2 mutations. Mutations of RAS-genes are often detected in CMML-like MPN progression. MS ex MN is characterized by complex karyotypes, FLT3 and/or NPM1 mutations, and often monoblastic phenotype. MN with LB transformation is associated with secondary genetic events linked to lineage reprogramming leading to the deregulation of ETV6, IKZF1, PAX5, PU.1, and RUNX1. Finally, the acquisition of MAPK-pathway gene mutations may shape MN toward histiocytic differentiation. Awareness of all these less well-known MN-progression types is important to guide optimal individual patient management.

Deepening Our Understanding of the Factors Affecting Landscape of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: What Do We Know about Them?

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) arise from the uncontrolled proliferation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in bone marrow. As with all tumors, the development of MPNs is a consequence of alterations in malignant cells and their interaction with other extrinsic factors that support and promote tumor progression. Since the discovery of driver mutations, much work has focused on studying and reviewing the genomic features of the disease but has neglected to delve into the important role that many other mechanisms may play. This review discusses the genetic component of MPNs but focuses mainly on some of the most relevant work investigating other non-genetic factors that may be crucial for the disease. The studies summarized here address MPN cell-intrinsic or -extrinsic factors and the interaction between them through transcriptomic, proteomic and microbiota studies, among others.

Primary Arterial Hypertension and Drug-Induced Hypertension in Philadelphia-Negative Classical Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Systematic Review

The impact of primary arterial hypertension (HTN) in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) remains unclear, with scant literature available, mostly focusing on cardiovascular risk factors as a singular entity or on organ-specific HTN. Furthermore, available studies reporting findings on drug-induced HTN in MPNs report varying and contradictory findings. In consideration of the above, this study set out to systematically review the available literature and shed light on the occurrence of HTN in MPNs, its association with thrombosis, as well as the drugs used in MPN management that could increase blood pressure. The literature search yielded 598 potentially relevant records of which 315 remained after the duplicates (n = 283) were removed. After we screened the titles and the abstracts of these publications, we removed irrelevant papers (n = 228) and evaluated the full texts of 87 papers. Furthermore, 13 records did not meet the inclusion criteria and were excluded from the systematic review. Finally, a total of 74 manuscripts were entered into the qualitative synthesis and included in the present systematic review. Our systematic review highlights that HTN is the most common comorbidity encountered in MPNs, with an impact on both the occurrence of thrombosis and survival. Moreover, drug-induced HTN remains a challenge in the management of MPNs. Further research should investigate the characteristics of patients with MPNs and HTN, as well as clarify the contribution of HTN to the development of thrombotic complications, survival and management in MPNs. In addition, the relationship between clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential, HTN, cardiovascular disease and MPNs requires examination in upcoming assessments.

Mutational landscape of blast phase myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN-BP) and antecedent MPN

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) have an inherent tendency to evolve to the blast phase (BP), characterized by ≥20% myeloblasts in the blood or bone marrow. MPN-BP portends a dismal prognosis and currently, effective treatment modalities are scarce, except for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in selected patients, particularly those who achieve complete/partial remission. The mutational landscape of MPN-BP differs from de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in several key aspects, such as significantly lower frequencies of FLT3 and DNMT3A mutations, and higher incidence of IDH1/2 and TP53 in MPN-BP. Herein, we comprehensively review the impact of the three signaling driver mutations (JAK2 V617F, CALR exon 9 indels, MPL W515K/L) that constitutively activate the JAK/STAT pathway, and of the other somatic non-driver mutations (epigenetic, mRNA splicing, transcriptional regulators, and mutations in signal transduction genes) that cooperatively or independently promote MPN progression and leukemic transformation. The MPN subtype, harboring two or more high-molecular risk (HMR) mutations (epigenetic regulators and mRNA splicing factors) and "triple-negative" PMF are among the critical factors that increase risk of leukemic transformation and shorten survival. Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is the most aggressive MPN; and polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) are relatively indolent subtypes. In PV and ET, mutations in splicing factor genes are associated with progression to myelofibrosis (MF), and in ET, TP53 mutations predict risk for leukemic transformation. The advent of targeted next-generation sequencing and improved prognostic scoring systems for PMF inform decisions regarding allo-HSCT. The emergence of treatments targeting mutant enzymes (e.g., IDH1/2 inhibitors) or epigenetic pathways (BET and LSD1 inhibitors) along with new insights into the mechanisms of leukemogenesis will hopefully lead the way to superior management strategies and outcomes of MPN-BP patients.

Rapid progression of myelofibrosis in polycythemia vera patient carrying SRSF2 c.284C>A p.(Pro95His) and unique ASXL1 splice site c.1720-2A>G variant

BACKGROUND

The prognosis in polycythemia vera (PV) is comparatively favorable, but individual myelofibrosis/leukemic progression risk is heterogeneous. About a quarter of patients progress to the fibrotic phase after 20 years.

METHODS

Multiplex PCR, allele-specific qPCR, high-resolution melt analysis, and Sanger sequencing were used to detect BCR-ABL, JAK2, ASXL1, SRSF2, U2AF1, and IDH1/2 variants.

RESULTS

Herein, we present a PV patient with rapid progression to secondary myelofibrosis probably due to the coexistence of homozygous JAK2 V617F mutation, SRSF2 c.284C>A p.(Pro95His) and splice site variant of ASXL1 c.1720-2A>G. The detected ASXL1 variant was first described in Bohring-Opitz syndrome and has not been reported in hematological malignancies so far. In the presented case, the ASXL1 VAF was stable (50%) during the 4-year follow-up, despite an evident increase in the JAK2 V617F VAF. Family history revealed cerebral palsy in the patient's grandson; however, germline character of the ASXL1 variant was excluded.

CONCLUSION

The biological consequences of the variant acquisition by hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) seem to be similar to other mutations of ASXL1 responsible for the truncation of ASXL1 protein, formation of hyperactive ASXL1-BAP1 (BRCA1-associated protein-1) complexes, and finally, the promotion of aberrant myeloid differentiation of HSC. Our report supports the hypothesis that ASXL1 alteration cooperates with JAK2 V617F leading to biased lineage skewing, favoring erythroid and megakaryocytic differentiation, accelerating the progression of PV to the fibrotic phase.

State-of-the-Art Review on Myelofibrosis Therapies

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by anemia, extramedullary hematopoiesis, bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, constitutional symptoms and acute myeloid leukemia progression. Currently, allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) therapy is the only curative option for MF patients. However, AHSCT is strictly limited due to the high rates of morbidity and mortality. Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitor Ruxolitinib is the first-line treatment for intermediate-II or high-risk MF patients with splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms, but most MF patients develop resistance or intolerance to Ruxolitinib. Therefore, MF treatment is a challenge for the medical community. This review summarizes 3 investigated directions for MF therapy: monotherapies of JAK inhibitors, monotherapies of non-JAK targeted agents, combination therapies of Ruxolitinib and other agents. We emphasize combination of Ruxolitinib and other agents is a promising strategy.

Evolution of severe (transfusion-dependent) anaemia in myelodysplastic syndromes with 5q deletion is characterized by a macrophage-associated failure of the eythropoietic niche

Evolution of erythrocyte transfusion-dependent (RBC-TD) anaemia associated with haploinsufficiency of the ribosomal protein subunit S14 gene (RPS14) is a characteristic complication of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with del(5q) [MDS.del(5q)]. Evaluating 39 patients with MDS.del(5q), <5% of anaemia progression was attributable to RPS14-dependent alterations of normoblasts, pro-erythroblasts, or CD34⁺ CD71⁺ precursors. Ninety-three percent of anaemia progression and 70% of the absolute decline in peripheral blood Hb value were attributable to disappearance of erythroblastic islands (Ery-Is). Ery-Is loss occurred independently of blast excess, TP53 mutation, additional chromosome aberrations and RPS14-dependent alterations of normoblasts and pro-erythroblasts. It was associated with RPS14-dependent intrinsic (S100A8⁺ ) and extrinsic [tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α)-overproduction] alterations of (CD169⁺ ) marrow macrophages (p < 0.00005). In a mouse model of RPS14 haploinsufficiency, Ery-Is disappeared to a similar degree: approximately 70% of Ery-Is loss was related to RPS14-dependent S100A8 overexpression of marrow macrophages, less than 20% to that of CD71^high Ter119^- immature precursors, and less than 5% to S100A8/p53 overexpression of normoblasts or pro-erythroblasts. Marked Ery-Is loss predicted reduced efficacy (erythrocyte transfusion independence) of lenalidomide therapy (p = 0.0006). Thus, erythroid hypoplasia, a characteristic complication of MDS.del(5q), seems to result primarily from a macrophage-associated failure of the erythropoietic niche markedly reducing the productive capacity of erythropoiesis as the leading factor in anaemia progression and evolution of RBC-TD in MDS.del(5q).

Molecular Progression of Myeloproliferative and Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Study on Sequential Bone Marrow Biopsies

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) both harbor the potential to undergo myelodysplastic progression or acceleration and can transform into blast-phase MPN or MDS/MPN, a form of secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although the initiating transforming events are yet to be determined, current concepts suggest a stepwise acquisition of (additional) somatic mutations-apart from the initial driver mutations-that trigger disease evolution. In this study we molecularly analyzed paired bone marrow samples of MPN and MDS/MPN patients with known progression and compared them to a control cohort of patients with stable disease course. Cases with progression displayed from the very beginning a higher number of mutations compared to stable ones, of which mutations in five (ASXL1, DNMT3A, NRAS, SRSF2 and TP53) strongly correlated with progression and/or transformation, even if only one of these genes was mutated, and this particularly applied to MPN. TET2 mutations were found to have a higher allelic frequency than the putative driver mutation in three progressing cases ("TET2-first"), whereas two stable cases displayed a TET2-positive subclone ("TET2-second"), supporting the hypothesis that not only the sum of mutations but also their order of appearance matters in the course of disease. Our data emphasize the importance of genetic testing in MPN and MDS/MPN patients in terms of risk stratification and identification of imminent disease progression.

Progression in Ph-Chromosome-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: An Overview on Pathologic Issues and Molecular Determinants

Progression in Ph-chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) develops with variable incidence and time sequence in essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, and primary myelofibrosis. These diseases show different clinic-pathologic features and outcomes despite sharing deregulated JAK/STAT signaling due to mutations in either the Janus kinase 2 or myeloproliferative leukemia or CALReticulin genes, which are the primary drivers of the diseases, as well as defined diagnostic criteria and biomarkers in most cases. Progression is defined by the development or worsening of marrow fibrosis or the progressive increase in the marrow blast percentage. Progression is often related to additional genetic aberrations, although some can already be detected during the chronic phase. Detailed scoring systems for clinical usage that are mostly applied in patients with primary myelofibrosis have been defined, and the most recent ones include cytogenetic and molecular parameters with prognostic significance. Additional different clinic-pathologic changes have been reported that may occur during the course of the disease and that are, at present, classified as WHO-defined types of progression, although they likely represent such an event. The present review is meant to provide an updated overview on progression in Ph-chromosome-negative MPN, with a major focus on the pathologic side.

Progression in Ph-Chromosome-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: An Overview on Pathologic Issues and Molecular Determinants

Progression in Ph-chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) develops with variable incidence and time sequence in essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, and primary myelofibrosis. These diseases show different clinic-pathologic features and outcomes despite sharing deregulated JAK/STAT signaling due to mutations in either the Janus kinase 2 or myeloproliferative leukemia or CALReticulin genes, which are the primary drivers of the diseases, as well as defined diagnostic criteria and biomarkers in most cases. Progression is defined by the development or worsening of marrow fibrosis or the progressive increase in the marrow blast percentage. Progression is often related to additional genetic aberrations, although some can already be detected during the chronic phase. Detailed scoring systems for clinical usage that are mostly applied in patients with primary myelofibrosis have been defined, and the most recent ones include cytogenetic and molecular parameters with prognostic significance. Additional different clinic-pathologic changes have been reported that may occur during the course of the disease and that are, at present, classified as WHO-defined types of progression, although they likely represent such an event. The present review is meant to provide an updated overview on progression in Ph-chromosome-negative MPN, with a major focus on the pathologic side.