1
|
Glennon E, Valtcheva S, Zhu A, Wadghiri YZ, Svirsky MA, Froemke RC. Locus coeruleus activity improves cochlear implant performance. Nature 2023; 613:317-323. [PMID: 36544024 PMCID: PMC10681749 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05554-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Cochlear implants (CIs) are neuroprosthetic devices that can provide hearing to deaf people1. Despite the benefits offered by CIs, the time taken for hearing to be restored and perceptual accuracy after long-term CI use remain highly variable2,3. CI use is believed to require neuroplasticity in the central auditory system, and differential engagement of neuroplastic mechanisms might contribute to the variability in outcomes4-7. Despite extensive studies on how CIs activate the auditory system4,8-12, the understanding of CI-related neuroplasticity remains limited. One potent factor enabling plasticity is the neuromodulator noradrenaline from the brainstem locus coeruleus (LC). Here we examine behavioural responses and neural activity in LC and auditory cortex of deafened rats fitted with multi-channel CIs. The rats were trained on a reward-based auditory task, and showed considerable individual differences of learning rates and maximum performance. LC photometry predicted when CI subjects began responding to sounds and longer-term perceptual accuracy. Optogenetic LC stimulation produced faster learning and higher long-term accuracy. Auditory cortical responses to CI stimulation reflected behavioural performance, with enhanced responses to rewarded stimuli and decreased distinction between unrewarded stimuli. Adequate engagement of central neuromodulatory systems is thus a potential clinically relevant target for optimizing neuroprosthetic device use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Glennon
- Skirball Institute for Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Neuroscience Institute, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Silvana Valtcheva
- Skirball Institute for Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Neuroscience Institute, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Angela Zhu
- Skirball Institute for Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Neuroscience Institute, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Youssef Z Wadghiri
- Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mario A Svirsky
- Neuroscience Institute, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Robert C Froemke
- Skirball Institute for Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
- Neuroscience Institute, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fallon JB, Dueck W, Trang EP, Smyth D, Wise AK. Effects of chronic implantation and long-term stimulation of a cochlear implant in the partial hearing cat model. Hear Res 2022; 426:108470. [PMID: 35249777 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2021] [Revised: 01/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The expansion of criteria for cochlear implantation has resulted in increasing numbers of cochlear implant subjects having some level of residual hearing. The present study examined the effects of implantation surgery and long-term electrical stimulation on residual hearing in a partially deafened cat model. Eighteen animals were partially deafened, implanted and chronically stimulated. Implantation resulted in a pronounced loss evident 2-weeks post implantation of up to 30-40 dB at 4 & 8 kHz which was statistically significant (2-way RM ANOVA (Time, Frequency): p(Time) = 0.001; p(Frequency) < 0.001; p(Time x Frequency) < 0.001)). Chronic stimulation resulted in a significant (RM ANOVA: p(Time) = 0.030) ongoing hearing loss, with 5 animals (∼30%) exhibiting an increase in threshold of 20 dB or more. Different loss profiles were evident with peripheral and central hearing assessments suggests that changes in 'central gain' may be occurring. Despite significant loss of hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons and distinct fibrous tissue growth in the scala tympani following implantation and long-term electrical stimulation, there were no significant correlations with any histological measures and ongoing hearing loss. The partially deafened, chronically stimulated cat model provides a clinically relevant model in which to further investigate the cause of the delayed hearing loss following cochlear implant surgery and use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James B Fallon
- Bionics Institute, Victoria, Australia; Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | | | | | | | - Andrew K Wise
- Bionics Institute, Victoria, Australia; Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Reiss LA, Kirk J, Claussen AD, Fallon JB. Animal Models of Hearing Loss after Cochlear Implantation and Electrical Stimulation. Hear Res 2022; 426:108624. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
4
|
Abstract
The auditory cortex of people with sensorineural hearing loss can be re-afferented using a cochlear implant (CI): a neural prosthesis that bypasses the damaged cells in the cochlea to directly stimulate the auditory nerve. Although CIs are the most successful neural prosthesis to date, some CI users still do not achieve satisfactory outcomes using these devices. To explain variability in outcomes, clinicians and researchers have increasingly focused their attention on neuroscientific investigations that examined how the auditory cortices respond to the electric signals that originate from the CI. This chapter provides an overview of the literature that examined how the auditory cortex changes its functional properties in response to inputs from the CI, in animal models and in humans. We focus first on the basic responses to sounds delivered through electrical hearing and, next, we examine the integrity of two fundamental aspects of the auditory system: tonotopy and processing of binaural cues. When addressing the effects of CIs in humans, we also consider speech-evoked responses. We conclude by discussing to what extent this neuroscientific literature can contribute to clinical practices and help to overcome variability in outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Pavani
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Carlyon RP, Goehring T. Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2021; 22:481-508. [PMID: 34432222 PMCID: PMC8476711 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-021-00811-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implants (CIs) are the world's most successful sensory prosthesis and have been the subject of intense research and development in recent decades. We critically review the progress in CI research, and its success in improving patient outcomes, from the turn of the century to the present day. The review focuses on the processing, stimulation, and audiological methods that have been used to try to improve speech perception by human CI listeners, and on fundamental new insights in the response of the auditory system to electrical stimulation. The introduction of directional microphones and of new noise reduction and pre-processing algorithms has produced robust and sometimes substantial improvements. Novel speech-processing algorithms, the use of current-focusing methods, and individualised (patient-by-patient) deactivation of subsets of electrodes have produced more modest improvements. We argue that incremental advances have and will continue to be made, that collectively these may substantially improve patient outcomes, but that the modest size of each individual advance will require greater attention to experimental design and power. We also briefly discuss the potential and limitations of promising technologies that are currently being developed in animal models, and suggest strategies for researchers to collectively maximise the potential of CIs to improve hearing in a wide range of listening situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert P Carlyon
- Cambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.
| | - Tobias Goehring
- Cambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Provision of interaural time difference information in chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation enhances neural sensitivity to these differences in neonatally deafened cats. Hear Res 2021; 406:108253. [PMID: 33971428 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Although performance with bilateral cochlear implants is superior to that with a unilateral implant, bilateral implantees have poor performance in sound localisation and in speech discrimination in noise compared to normal hearing subjects. Studies of the neural processing of interaural time differences (ITDs) in the inferior colliculus (IC) of long-term deaf animals, show substantial degradation compared to that in normal hearing animals. It is not known whether this degradation can be ameliorated by chronic cochlear electrical stimulation, but such amelioration is unlikely to be achieved using current clinical speech processors and cochlear implants, which do not provide good ITD cues. We therefore developed a custom sound processor to deliver salient ITDs for chronic bilateral intra-cochlear electrical stimulation in a cat model of neonatal deafness, to determine if long-term exposure to salient ITDs would prevent degradation of ITD processing. We compared the sensitivity to ITDs in cochlear electrical stimuli of neurons in the IC of cats chronically stimulated with our custom ITD-aware sound processor with sensitivity in acutely deafened cats with normal hearing development and in cats chronically stimulated with a clinical stimulator and sound processor. Animals that experienced stimulation with our custom ITD-aware sound processor had significantly higher neural sensitivity to ITDs than those that received stimulation from clinical sound processors. There was no significant difference between animals received no stimulation and those that received stimulation from clinical sound processors, consistent with findings from clinical cochlear implant users. This result suggests that development and use of clinical ITD-aware sound processing strategies from a young age may promote ITD sensitivity in the clinical population.
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang J, Firestone E, Elattma A. Animal Models of Tinnitus Treatment: Cochlear and Brain Stimulation. Curr Top Behav Neurosci 2021; 51:83-129. [PMID: 34282563 DOI: 10.1007/7854_2021_227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Neuromodulation, via stimulation of a variety of peripheral and central structures, is used to suppress tinnitus. However, investigative limitations in humans due to ethical reasons have made it difficult to decipher the mechanisms underlying treatment-induced tinnitus relief, so a number of animal models have arisen to address these unknowns. This chapter reviews animal models of cochlear and brain stimulation and assesses their modulatory effects on behavioral evidence of tinnitus and its related neural correlates. When a structure is stimulated, localized modulation, often presenting as downregulation of spontaneous neuronal spike firing rate, bursting and neurosynchrony, occurs within the brain area. Through anatomical projections and transmitter pathways, the interventions activate both auditory- and non-auditory structures by taking bottom-up ascending and top-down descending modes to influence their target brain structures. Furthermore, it is the brain oscillations that cochlear or brain stimulation evoke and connect the prefrontal cortex, striatal systems, and other limbic structures to refresh neural networks and relieve auditory, attentive, conscious, as well as emotional reactive aspects of tinnitus. This oscillatory neural network connectivity is achieved via the thalamocorticothalamic circuitry including the lemniscal and non-lemniscal auditory brain structures. Beyond existing technologies, the review also reveals opportunities for developing advanced animal models using new modalities to achieve precision neuromodulation and tinnitus abatement, such as optogenetic cochlear and/or brain stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinsheng Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA. .,Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Wayne State University College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Detroit, MI, USA.
| | - Ethan Firestone
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Ahmed Elattma
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Glennon E, Svirsky MA, Froemke RC. Auditory cortical plasticity in cochlear implant users. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2019; 60:108-114. [PMID: 31864104 DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2019.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Revised: 10/26/2019] [Accepted: 11/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Cochlear implants are one of the most successful neuroprosthetic devices that have been developed to date. Profoundly deaf patients can achieve speech perception after complete loss of sensory input. Despite the improvements many patients experience, there is still a large degree of outcome variability. It has been proposed that central plasticity may be a major factor in the different levels of benefit that patients experience. However, the neural mechanisms of how plasticity impacts cochlear implant learning and the degree of plasticity's influence remain unknown. Here, we review the human and animal research on three of the main ways that central plasticity affects cochlear implant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Glennon
- Skirball Institute for Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Neuroscience Institute, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mario A Svirsky
- Skirball Institute for Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Neuroscience Institute, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Robert C Froemke
- Skirball Institute for Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Neuroscience Institute, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute Faculty Scholar, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking. Ear Hear 2019; 39:895-905. [PMID: 29337763 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The binaural-hearing system interaurally compares inputs, which underlies the ability to localize sound sources and to better understand speech in complex acoustic environments. Cochlear implants (CIs) are provided in both ears to increase binaural-hearing benefits; however, bilateral CI users continue to struggle with understanding speech in the presence of interfering sounds and do not achieve the same level of spatial release from masking (SRM) as normal-hearing listeners. One reason for diminished SRM in CI users could be that the electrode arrays are inserted at different depths in each ear, which would cause an interaural frequency mismatch. Because interaural frequency mismatch diminishes the salience of interaural differences for relatively simple stimuli, it may also diminish binaural benefits for spectral-temporally complex stimuli like speech. This study evaluated the effect of simulated frequency-to-place mismatch on speech understanding and SRM. DESIGN Eleven normal-hearing listeners were tested on a speech understanding task. There was a female target talker who spoke five-word sentences from a closed set of words. There were two interfering male talkers who spoke unrelated sentences. Nonindividualized head-related transfer functions were used to simulate a virtual auditory space. The target was presented from the front (0°), and the interfering speech was either presented from the front (colocated) or from 90° to the right (spatially separated). Stimuli were then processed by an eight-channel vocoder with tonal carriers to simulate aspects of listening through a CI. Frequency-to-place mismatch ("shift") was introduced by increasing the center frequency of the synthesis filters compared with the corresponding analysis filters. Speech understanding was measured for different shifts (0, 3, 4.5, and 6 mm) and target-to-masker ratios (TMRs: +10 to -10 dB). SRM was calculated as the difference in the percentage of correct words for the colocated and separated conditions. Two types of shifts were tested: (1) bilateral shifts that had the same frequency-to-place mismatch in both ears, but no interaural frequency mismatch, and (2) unilateral shifts that produced an interaural frequency mismatch. RESULTS For the bilateral shift conditions, speech understanding decreased with increasing shift and with decreasing TMR, for both colocated and separate conditions. There was, however, no interaction between shift and spatial configuration; in other words, SRM was not affected by shift. For the unilateral shift conditions, speech understanding decreased with increasing interaural mismatch and with decreasing TMR for both the colocated and spatially separated conditions. Critically, there was a significant interaction between the amount of shift and spatial configuration; in other words, SRM decreased for increasing interaural mismatch. CONCLUSIONS A frequency-to-place mismatch in one or both ears resulted in decreased speech understanding. SRM, however, was only affected in conditions with unilateral shifts and interaural frequency mismatch. Therefore, matching frequency information between the ears provides listeners with larger binaural-hearing benefits, for example, improved speech understanding in the presence of interfering talkers. A clinical procedure to reduce interaural frequency mismatch when programming bilateral CIs may improve benefits in speech segregation that are due to binaural-hearing abilities.
Collapse
|
10
|
Bernstein JGW, Stakhovskaya OA, Schuchman GI, Jensen KK, Goupell MJ. Interaural Time-Difference Discrimination as a Measure of Place of Stimulation for Cochlear-Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness. Trends Hear 2019; 22:2331216518765514. [PMID: 29623771 PMCID: PMC5894906 DOI: 10.1177/2331216518765514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Current clinical practice in programming a cochlear implant (CI) for individuals with single-sided deafness (SSD) is to maximize the transmission of speech information via the implant, with the implicit assumption that this will also result in improved spatial-hearing abilities. However, binaural sensitivity is reduced by interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch, a likely occurrence with a standard CI frequency-to-electrode allocation table (FAT). As a step toward reducing interaural mismatch, this study investigated whether a test of interaural-time-difference (ITD) discrimination could be used to estimate the acoustic frequency yielding the best place match for a given CI electrode. ITD-discrimination performance was measured by presenting 300-ms bursts of 100-pulses-per-second electrical pulse trains to a single CI electrode and band-limited pulse trains with variable carrier frequencies to the acoustic ear. Listeners discriminated between two reference intervals (four bursts each with constant ITD) and a moving target interval (four bursts with variable ITD). For 17 out of the 26 electrodes tested across eight listeners, the function describing the relationship between ITD-discrimination performance and carrier frequency had a discernable peak where listeners achieved 70% to 100% performance. On average, this peak occurred 1.15 octaves above the CI manufacturer’s default FAT. ITD discrimination shows promise as a method of estimating the cochlear place of stimulation for a given electrode, thereby providing information to optimize the FAT for SSD-CI listeners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua G W Bernstein
- 1 National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Olga A Stakhovskaya
- 1 National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.,2 Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Gerald I Schuchman
- 1 National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Kenneth K Jensen
- 1 National Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Matthew J Goupell
- 2 Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zaltz Y, Goldsworthy RL, Kishon-Rabin L, Eisenberg LS. Voice Discrimination by Adults with Cochlear Implants: the Benefits of Early Implantation for Vocal-Tract Length Perception. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2018; 19:193-209. [PMID: 29313147 PMCID: PMC5878152 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-017-0653-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2017] [Accepted: 12/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implant (CI) users find it extremely difficult to discriminate between talkers, which may partially explain why they struggle to understand speech in a multi-talker environment. Recent studies, based on findings with postlingually deafened CI users, suggest that these difficulties may stem from their limited use of vocal-tract length (VTL) cues due to the degraded spectral resolution transmitted by the CI device. The aim of the present study was to assess the ability of adult CI users who had no prior acoustic experience, i.e., prelingually deafened adults, to discriminate between resynthesized "talkers" based on either fundamental frequency (F0) cues, VTL cues, or both. Performance was compared to individuals with normal hearing (NH), listening either to degraded stimuli, using a noise-excited channel vocoder, or non-degraded stimuli. Results show that (a) age of implantation was associated with VTL but not F0 cues in discriminating between talkers, with improved discrimination for those subjects who were implanted at earlier age; (b) there was a positive relationship for the CI users between VTL discrimination and speech recognition score in quiet and in noise, but not with frequency discrimination or cognitive abilities; (c) early-implanted CI users showed similar voice discrimination ability as the NH adults who listened to vocoded stimuli. These data support the notion that voice discrimination is limited by the speech processing of the CI device. However, they also suggest that early implantation may facilitate sensory-driven tonotopicity and/or improve higher-order auditory functions, enabling better perception of VTL spectral cues for voice discrimination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yael Zaltz
- Department of Communication Disorders, Steyer School of Health Professions, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
- USC Tina and Rick Caruso Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Raymond L Goldsworthy
- USC Tina and Rick Caruso Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Liat Kishon-Rabin
- Department of Communication Disorders, Steyer School of Health Professions, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Laurie S Eisenberg
- USC Tina and Rick Caruso Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Barriga-Rivera A, Tatarinoff V, Lovell NH, Morley JW, Suaning GJ. Long-term anesthetic protocol in rats: feasibility in electrophysiology studies in visual prosthesis. Vet Ophthalmol 2017; 21:290-297. [PMID: 29148158 DOI: 10.1111/vop.12507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Electrical stimulation of excitable cells provides therapeutic benefits for a variety of medical conditions, including restoration of partial vision to those blinded via some types of retinal degeneration. To improve visual percepts elicited by the current technology, researchers are conducting acute electrophysiology experiments, mainly in cats. However, the rat can provide a model of a range of retinal diseases and possesses a sufficiently large eye to be used in this field. This article presents a long-term anesthetic protocol to enable electrophysiology experiments to further the development of visual prostheses. Six Long-Evans rats (aged between 14 and 16 weeks) were included in this study. Surgical anesthesia was maintained for more than 15 h by combining constant intravenous infusion of ketamine (24.0-34.5 mg/kg/h), xylazine (0.9-1.2 mg/kg/h), and inhaled isoflurane in oxygen (<0.5%). Overall heart rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature remained between 187-233 beats/min, 45-58 breaths/min, and 36-38 °C, respectively. Neural responses to 200-ms light pulses were recorded from the superior colliculus using a 32-channel neural probe at the beginning and before termination of the experiment. Robust responses were recorded from distinct functional types of retinal pathways. In addition, a platinum electrode was implanted in the retrobulbar space. The retina was electrically stimulated, and the activation threshold was determined to be 5.24 ± 0.24 μC/cm2 . This protocol may be used not only in the field of visual prosthesis research, but in other research areas requiring longer term acute experiments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Barriga-Rivera
- Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.,Division of Neuroscience, University Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla, 41013, Spain
| | - Veronica Tatarinoff
- Sydney Imaging Core Research Facility, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Nigel H Lovell
- Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - John W Morley
- School of Medicine, The University of Western Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,School of Medical Science, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Gregg J Suaning
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.,Faculty of Engineering and Information Technologies, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Over the last 30 years a wide range of manipulations of auditory input and experience have been shown to result in plasticity in auditory cortical and subcortical structures. The time course of plasticity ranges from very rapid stimulus-specific adaptation to longer-term changes associated with, for example, partial hearing loss or perceptual learning. Evidence for plasticity as a consequence of these and a range of other manipulations of auditory input and/or its significance is reviewed, with an emphasis on plasticity in adults and in the auditory cortex. The nature of the changes in auditory cortex associated with attention, memory and perceptual learning depend critically on task structure, reward contingencies, and learning strategy. Most forms of auditory system plasticity are adaptive, in that they serve to optimize auditory performance, prompting attempts to harness this plasticity for therapeutic purposes. However, plasticity associated with cochlear trauma and partial hearing loss appears to be maladaptive, and has been linked to tinnitus. Three important forms of human learning-related auditory system plasticity are those associated with language development, musical training, and improvement in performance with a cochlear implant. Almost all forms of plasticity involve changes in synaptic excitatory - inhibitory balance within existing patterns of connectivity. An attractive model applicable to a number of forms of learning-related plasticity is dynamic multiplexing by individual neurons, such that learning involving a particular stimulus attribute reflects a particular subset of the diverse inputs to a given neuron being gated by top-down influences. The plasticity evidence indicates that auditory cortex is a component of complex distributed networks that integrate the representation of auditory stimuli with attention, decision and reward processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dexter R F Irvine
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia; School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hong CS, Wang JL, Dornbos D, Joehlin-Price A, Elder JB. BRAF-Mutated Pleomorphic Xanthoastrocytoma of the Spinal Cord with Eventual Anaplastic Transformation. World Neurosurg 2016; 98:871.e9-871.e15. [PMID: 27956254 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2016] [Accepted: 11/29/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) is an uncommon, primary neoplasm of the central nervous system with a relatively favorable prognosis. Most patients are managed with surgery alone and experience significant long-term survival. PXAs occur most commonly along the superficial surfaces of the temporal lobes. Although these tumors may occur in other regions of the brain, their origin within the spinal cord is rare, and it is unclear whether spinal cord PXAs should be managed differently from their intracranial counterparts. CASE DESCRIPTION We describe a 31-year-old patient with a PXA of spinal cord origin who despite surgery, radiation, and multiple chemotherapy regimens experienced anaplastic transformation of his tumor and died of extensive leptomeningeal progression. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, our patient represents the seventh reported case of PXA of the spinal cord but is the first described to have a BRAF mutation. Specifically, both the initial and recurrent tumors of the patient showed the same BRAF V600E mutation, which refutes previous suggestions that BRAF mutations may be limited to intracranial PXAs and also shows that BRAF mutations may occur earlier in PXA tumorigenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher S Hong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Joshua L Wang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - David Dornbos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Amy Joehlin-Price
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - James Bradley Elder
- Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Johnson LA, Della Santina CC, Wang X. Selective Neuronal Activation by Cochlear Implant Stimulation in Auditory Cortex of Awake Primate. J Neurosci 2016; 36:12468-12484. [PMID: 27927962 PMCID: PMC5148231 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1699-16.2016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2016] [Revised: 10/05/2016] [Accepted: 10/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the success of cochlear implants (CIs) in human populations, most users perform poorly in noisy environments and music and tonal language perception. How CI devices engage the brain at the single neuron level has remained largely unknown, in particular in the primate brain. By comparing neuronal responses with acoustic and CI stimulation in marmoset monkeys unilaterally implanted with a CI electrode array, we discovered that CI stimulation was surprisingly ineffective at activating many neurons in auditory cortex, particularly in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the CI. Further analyses revealed that the CI-nonresponsive neurons were narrowly tuned to frequency and sound level when probed with acoustic stimuli; such neurons likely play a role in perceptual behaviors requiring fine frequency and level discrimination, tasks that CI users find especially challenging. These findings suggest potential deficits in central auditory processing of CI stimulation and provide important insights into factors responsible for poor CI user performance in a wide range of perceptual tasks. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The cochlear implant (CI) is the most successful neural prosthetic device to date and has restored hearing in hundreds of thousands of deaf individuals worldwide. However, despite its huge successes, CI users still face many perceptual limitations, and the brain mechanisms involved in hearing through CI devices remain poorly understood. By directly comparing single-neuron responses to acoustic and CI stimulation in auditory cortex of awake marmoset monkeys, we discovered that neurons unresponsive to CI stimulation were sharply tuned to frequency and sound level. Our results point out a major deficit in central auditory processing of CI stimulation and provide important insights into mechanisms underlying the poor CI user performance in a wide range of perceptual tasks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Charles C Della Santina
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering and
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21025
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
King J, Shehu I, Roland JT, Svirsky MA, Froemke RC. A physiological and behavioral system for hearing restoration with cochlear implants. J Neurophysiol 2016; 116:844-58. [PMID: 27281743 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00048.2016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2016] [Accepted: 05/31/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implants are neuroprosthetic devices that provide hearing to deaf patients, although outcomes are highly variable even with prolonged training and use. The central auditory system must process cochlear implant signals, but it is unclear how neural circuits adapt-or fail to adapt-to such inputs. The knowledge of these mechanisms is required for development of next-generation neuroprosthetics that interface with existing neural circuits and enable synaptic plasticity to improve perceptual outcomes. Here, we describe a new system for cochlear implant insertion, stimulation, and behavioral training in rats. Animals were first ensured to have significant hearing loss via physiological and behavioral criteria. We developed a surgical approach for multichannel (2- or 8-channel) array insertion, comparable with implantation procedures and depth in humans. Peripheral and cortical responses to stimulation were used to program the implant objectively. Animals fitted with implants learned to use them for an auditory-dependent task that assesses frequency detection and recognition in a background of environmentally and self-generated noise and ceased responding appropriately to sounds when the implant was temporarily inactivated. This physiologically calibrated and behaviorally validated system provides a powerful opportunity to study the neural basis of neuroprosthetic device use and plasticity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia King
- Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; Neuroscience Institute, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Ina Shehu
- Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Biology, Hunter College, New York, New York; and
| | - J Thomas Roland
- Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Mario A Svirsky
- Neuroscience Institute, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York. *, co-senior authors
| | - Robert C Froemke
- Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; Neuroscience Institute, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York. *, co-senior authors.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Irving S, Wise AK, Millard RE, Shepherd RK, Fallon JB. A partial hearing animal model for chronic electro-acoustic stimulation. J Neural Eng 2014; 11:046008. [PMID: 24921595 PMCID: PMC4116305 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/4/046008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cochlear implants (CIs) have provided some auditory function to hundreds of thousands of people around the world. Although traditionally carried out only in profoundly deaf patients, the eligibility criteria for implantation have recently been relaxed to include many partially-deaf patients with useful levels of hearing. These patients receive both electrical stimulation from their implant and acoustic stimulation via their residual hearing (electro-acoustic stimulation; EAS) and perform very well. It is unclear how EAS improves speech perception over electrical stimulation alone, and little evidence exists about the nature of the interactions between electric and acoustic stimuli. Furthermore, clinical results suggest that some patients that undergo cochlear implantation lose some, if not all, of their residual hearing, reducing the advantages of EAS over electrical stimulation alone. A reliable animal model with clinically-relevant partial deafness combined with clinical CIs is important to enable these issues to be studied. This paper outlines such a model that has been successfully used in our laboratory. APPROACH This paper outlines a battery of techniques used in our laboratory to generate, validate and examine an animal model of partial deafness and chronic CI use. MAIN RESULTS Ototoxic deafening produced bilaterally symmetrical hearing thresholds in neonatal and adult animals. Electrical activation of the auditory system was confirmed, and all animals were chronically stimulated via adapted clinical CIs. Acoustic compound action potentials (CAPs) were obtained from partially-hearing cochleae, using the CI amplifier. Immunohistochemical analysis allows the effects of deafness and electrical stimulation on cell survival to be studied. SIGNIFICANCE This animal model has applications in EAS research, including investigating the functional interactions between electric and acoustic stimulation, and the development of techniques to maintain residual hearing following cochlear implantation. The ability to record CAPs via the CI has clinical direct relevance for obtaining objective measures of residual hearing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Irving
- Bionics Institute, Melbourne, Australia. University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Nayagam DAX, Williams RA, Allen PJ, Shivdasani MN, Luu CD, Salinas-LaRosa CM, Finch S, Ayton LN, Saunders AL, McPhedran M, McGowan C, Villalobos J, Fallon JB, Wise AK, Yeoh J, Xu J, Feng H, Millard R, McWade M, Thien PC, Williams CE, Shepherd RK. Chronic electrical stimulation with a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis: a preclinical safety and efficacy study. PLoS One 2014; 9:e97182. [PMID: 24853376 PMCID: PMC4031073 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2013] [Accepted: 04/16/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess the safety and efficacy of chronic electrical stimulation of the retina with a suprachoroidal visual prosthesis. Methods Seven normally-sighted feline subjects were implanted for 96–143 days with a suprachoroidal electrode array and six were chronically stimulated for 70–105 days at levels that activated the visual cortex. Charge balanced, biphasic, current pulses were delivered to platinum electrodes in a monopolar stimulation mode. Retinal integrity/function and the mechanical stability of the implant were assessed monthly using electroretinography (ERG), optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus photography. Electrode impedances were measured weekly and electrically-evoked visual cortex potentials (eEVCPs) were measured monthly to verify that chronic stimuli were suprathreshold. At the end of the chronic stimulation period, thresholds were confirmed with multi-unit recordings from the visual cortex. Randomized, blinded histological assessments were performed by two pathologists to compare the stimulated and non-stimulated retina and adjacent tissue. Results All subjects tolerated the surgical and stimulation procedure with no evidence of discomfort or unexpected adverse outcomes. After an initial post-operative settling period, electrode arrays were mechanically stable. Mean electrode impedances were stable between 11–15 kΩ during the implantation period. Visually-evoked ERGs & OCT were normal, and mean eEVCP thresholds did not substantially differ over time. In 81 of 84 electrode-adjacent tissue samples examined, there were no discernible histopathological differences between stimulated and unstimulated tissue. In the remaining three tissue samples there were minor focal fibroblastic and acute inflammatory responses. Conclusions Chronic suprathreshold electrical stimulation of the retina using a suprachoroidal electrode array evoked a minimal tissue response and no adverse clinical or histological findings. Moreover, thresholds and electrode impedance remained stable for stimulation durations of up to 15 weeks. This study has demonstrated the safety and efficacy of suprachoroidal stimulation with charge balanced stimulus currents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A. X. Nayagam
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Richard A. Williams
- Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | - Penelope J. Allen
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mohit N. Shivdasani
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Chi D. Luu
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cesar M. Salinas-LaRosa
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sue Finch
- Statistical Consulting Centre, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lauren N. Ayton
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - Ceara McGowan
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - James B. Fallon
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew K. Wise
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Otolaryngology, The University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jonathan Yeoh
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jin Xu
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The HEARing Cooperative Research Centre, The University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Otolaryngology, The University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helen Feng
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Otolaryngology, The University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Melanie McWade
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Biomedical Engineering Department, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | | | - Chris E. Williams
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Robert K. Shepherd
- Bionics Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|