Oscillation or not-Why we can and need to know (commentary on Doelling and Assaneo, 2021)

Neural tracking of continuous acoustics: properties, speech-specificity and open questions

Human speech is a particularly relevant acoustic stimulus for our species, due to its role of information transmission during communication. Speech is inherently a dynamic signal, and a recent line of research focused on neural activity following the temporal structure of speech. We review findings that characterise neural dynamics in the processing of continuous acoustics and that allow us to compare these dynamics with temporal aspects in human speech. We highlight properties and constraints that both neural and speech dynamics have, suggesting that auditory neural systems are optimised to process human speech. We then discuss the speech-specificity of neural dynamics and their potential mechanistic origins and summarise open questions in the field.

40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Responses in Schizophrenia: Toward a Mechanistic Biomarker for Circuit Dysfunctions and Early Detection and Diagnosis

There is converging evidence that 40-Hz auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) are robustly impaired in schizophrenia and could constitute a potential biomarker for characterizing circuit dysfunctions as well as enable early detection and diagnosis. Here, we provide an overview of the mechanisms involved in 40-Hz ASSRs, drawing on computational, physiological, and pharmacological data with a focus on parameters modulating the balance between excitation and inhibition. We will then summarize findings from electro- and magnetoencephalographic studies in participants at clinical high risk for psychosis, patients with first-episode psychosis, and patients with schizophrenia to identify the pattern of deficits across illness stages, the relationship with clinical variables, and the prognostic potential. Finally, data on genetics and developmental modifications will be reviewed, highlighting the importance of late modifications of 40-Hz ASSRs during adolescence, which are closely related to the underlying changes in GABA (gamma-aminobutyric acid) interneurons. Together, our review suggests that 40-Hz ASSRs may constitute an informative electrophysiological approach to characterize circuit dysfunctions in psychosis that could be relevant for the development of mechanistic biomarkers.

Neural synchronization is strongest to the spectral flux of slow music and depends on familiarity and beat salience

Neural activity in the auditory system synchronizes to sound rhythms, and brain–environment synchronization is thought to be fundamental to successful auditory perception. Sound rhythms are often operationalized in terms of the sound’s amplitude envelope. We hypothesized that – especially for music – the envelope might not best capture the complex spectro-temporal fluctuations that give rise to beat perception and synchronized neural activity. This study investigated (1) neural synchronization to different musical features, (2) tempo-dependence of neural synchronization, and (3) dependence of synchronization on familiarity, enjoyment, and ease of beat perception. In this electroencephalography study, 37 human participants listened to tempo-modulated music (1–4 Hz). Independent of whether the analysis approach was based on temporal response functions (TRFs) or reliable components analysis (RCA), the spectral flux of music – as opposed to the amplitude envelope – evoked strongest neural synchronization. Moreover, music with slower beat rates, high familiarity, and easy-to-perceive beats elicited the strongest neural response. Our results demonstrate the importance of spectro-temporal fluctuations in music for driving neural synchronization, and highlight its sensitivity to musical tempo, familiarity, and beat salience.

When we listen to a melody, the activity of our neurons synchronizes to the music: in fact, it is likely that the closer the match, the better we can perceive the piece. However, it remains unclear exactly which musical features our brain cells synchronize to. Previous studies, which have often used ‘simplified’ music, have highlighted that the amplitude envelope (how the intensity of the sounds changes over time) could be involved in this phenomenon, alongside factors such as musical training, attention, familiarity with the piece or even enjoyment. Whether differences in neural synchronization could explain why musical tastes vary between people is also still a matter of debate.

In their study, Weineck et al. aim to better understand what drives neuronal synchronization to music. A technique known as electroencephalography was used to record brain activity in 37 volunteers listening to instrumental music whose tempo ranged from 60 to 240 beats per minute. The tunes varied across an array of features such as familiarity, enjoyment and how easy the beat was to perceive. Two different approaches were then used to calculate neural synchronization, which yielded converging results.

The analyses revealed that three types of factors were associated with a strong neural synchronization. First, amongst the various cadences, a tempo of 60-120 beats per minute elicited the strongest match with neuronal activity. Interestingly, this beat is commonly found in Western pop music, is usually preferred by listeners, and often matches spontaneous body rhythms such as walking pace. Second, synchronization was linked to variations in pitch and sound quality (known as ‘spectral flux’) rather than in the amplitude envelope. And finally, familiarity and perceived beat saliency – but not enjoyment or musical expertise – were connected to stronger synchronization.

These findings help to better understand how our brains allow us to perceive and connect with music. The work conducted by Weineck et al. should help other researchers to investigate this field; in particular, it shows how important it is to consider spectral flux rather than amplitude envelope in experiments that use actual music.