1
|
Hao Q, Zheng W, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Ding H, OuYang J, Liu Z, Wu G, Liu R. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in primary Meige syndrome: motor and non-motor outcomes. Eur J Neurol 2024; 31:e16121. [PMID: 37933887 PMCID: PMC11235968 DOI: 10.1111/ene.16121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a promising treatment for movement disorders. This prospective study aims to evaluate the effects of bilateral subthalamic nucleus DBS (STN-DBS) on motor and non-motor symptoms in patients with primary Meige syndrome. METHODS Thirty patients who underwent bilateral STN-DBS between April 2017 and June 2020 were included. Standardized and validated scales were utilized to assess the severity of dystonia, health-related quality of life, sleep, cognitive function and mental status at baseline and at 1 year and 3 years after neurostimulation. RESULTS The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale movement scores showed a mean improvement of 63.0% and 66.8% at 1 year and 3 years, respectively, after neurostimulation. Similarly, the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale disability scores improved by 60.8% and 63.3% at the same time points. Postoperative quality of life demonstrated a significant and sustained improvement throughout the follow-up period. However, cognitive function, mental status, sleep quality and other neuropsychological functions did not change after 3 years of neurostimulation. Eight adverse events occurred in six patients, but no deaths or permanent sequelae were reported. CONCLUSIONS Bilateral STN-DBS is a safe and effective alternative treatment for primary Meige syndrome, leading to improvements in motor function and quality of life. Nevertheless, it did not yield significant amelioration in cognitive, mental, sleep status and other neuropsychological functions after 3 years of neurostimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing‐Pei Hao
- Department of NeurosurgeryPeking University People's HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Wen‐Tao Zheng
- Department of NeurosurgeryPeking University People's HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Zi‐Hao Zhang
- Department of NeurosurgeryPeking University People's HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Ye‐Zu Liu
- Department of NeurosurgeryPeking University People's HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Hu Ding
- Department of NeurologyPeking University People's HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Jia OuYang
- Department of NeurosurgeryPeking University People's HospitalBeijingChina
- Functional Neurosurgery Research CenterPeking University Health Science CenterBeijingChina
| | - Zhi Liu
- Department of NeuropsychologyPeking University People's HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Guang‐Yong Wu
- Department of NeurosurgeryPeking University People's HospitalBeijingChina
- Department of NeuropsychologyPeking University People's HospitalBeijingChina
- Department of NeurosurgeryBeijing Shunyi HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Ru‐En Liu
- Department of NeurosurgeryPeking University People's HospitalBeijingChina
- Department of NeuropsychologyPeking University People's HospitalBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Öztürk G, Paksoy K. The Safety to Switch from Constant Voltage to Constant Current with a Mixed Internal Pulse Generator in Deep Brain Stimulation. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2023; 26:507-512. [PMID: 37970246 PMCID: PMC10645245 DOI: 10.4103/aian.aian_331_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an efficient modality for the treatment of movement disorders. Differing from the constant voltage (CV)-DBS devices, constant current (CC)-DBS devices may allow more precise stimulation of the target brain regions since they are less influenced by impedance. If internal pulse generators (IPGs) of DBS devices are required to be connected with electrodes of different brands, employing proper adapters is necessary. Such connected DBS devices are called mixed or hybrid devices. Objectives As there is sparse information about the clinical mixed devices, we studied their safety and efficacy. Materials and Methods Clinical scores of 13 patients implanted with mixed DBS devices were determined with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) (n = 10) and with the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) in dystonia (n = 3). Patient satisfaction was assessed with the Timmerman questionnaire. The Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Scale was also evaluated. Results Patients' overall satisfaction was considerably higher with mixed devices. The UPDRS and BFMDRS clinical scores did not significantly differ after switching to a mixed DBS device. Three patients before the DBS switch suffered from side effects under the CV mode. These patients got rid of the side effects in their follow-up with a reduction in pulse width values. Discussion Mixed devices working in CC mode are well tolerated with high patient satisfaction. Conclusion Besides patient satisfaction, mixed IPGs are also considered safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gülşah Öztürk
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sisli Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Kemal Paksoy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Bahcelievler Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Munhoz RP, Albuainain G. Deep brain stimulation - New programming algorithms and teleprogramming. Expert Rev Neurother 2023; 23:467-478. [PMID: 37115193 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2023.2208749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Thanks to a variety of factors, the field of neuromodulation has evolved significantly over the past decade. Developments include new indications and innovations of hardware, software, and stimulation techniques leading to an expansion in scope and role of these techniques as powerful therapies. They also imply the realization that practical application involves new nuances that make patient selection, surgical technique and the programming process even more complex, requiring continuous education and an organized structured approach. AREAS COVERED In this review, the authors explore the developments in deep brain stimulation technology, including electrodes, implantable pulse generators, contact configurations (i.e, directional leads and independent current control), remote programming and sensing using local field potentials. EXPERT OPINION The innovations in the field of deep brain stimulation discussed in this review potentially provide increased effectiveness and flexibility not only to improve therapeutic response but also to address troubleshooting challenges seen in clinical practice. Directional leads and shorter pulse widths may broaden the therapeutic window of stimulation, avoiding current spread to structures that might trigger stimulation-related side effects. Similarly, independent control of current to individual contacts allows for the shaping of the electric field. Finally, sensing and remote programming represent important developments for more effective and individualized patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Puppi Munhoz
- Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Centre and the Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Krembil Research Institute, Toronto, ON, M5T 2S8, Canada
| | - Ghadh Albuainain
- Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Centre and the Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
A novel ex vivo assay to define charge-balanced electrical stimulation parameters for neural precursor cell activation in vivo. Brain Res 2023; 1804:148263. [PMID: 36702184 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2023.148263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Endogenous neural stem cells and their progeny (together termed neural precursor cells (NPCs)) are promising candidates to facilitate neuroregeneration. Charge-balanced biphasic monopolar stimulation (BPMP) is a clinically relevant approach that can activate NPCs both in vitro and in vivo. Herein, we established a novel ex vivo stimulation system to optimize the efficacy of BPMP electric field (EF) application in activating endogenous NPCs. Using the ex vivo system, we discerned that cathodal amplitude of 200 μA resulted in the greatest NPC pool expansion and enhanced cathodal migration. Application of the same stimulation parameters in vivo resulted in the same NPC activation in the mouse brain. The design and implementation of the novel ex vivo model bridges the gap between in vitro and in vivo systems, enabling a moderate throughput stimulation system to explore and optimize EF parameters that can be applied to clinically relevant brain injury/disease models.
Collapse
|
5
|
Silverio AA, Silverio LAA. Developments in Deep Brain Stimulators for Successful Aging Towards Smart Devices—An Overview. FRONTIERS IN AGING 2022; 3:848219. [PMID: 35821845 PMCID: PMC9261350 DOI: 10.3389/fragi.2022.848219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
This work provides an overview of the present state-of-the-art in the development of deep brain Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) and how such devices alleviate motor and cognitive disorders for a successful aging. This work reviews chronic diseases that are addressable via DBS, reporting also the treatment efficacies. The underlying mechanism for DBS is also reported. A discussion on hardware developments focusing on DBS control paradigms is included specifically the open- and closed-loop “smart” control implementations. Furthermore, developments towards a “smart” DBS, while considering the design challenges, current state of the art, and constraints, are also presented. This work also showcased different methods, using ambient energy scavenging, that offer alternative solutions to prolong the battery life of the DBS device. These are geared towards a low maintenance, semi-autonomous, and less disruptive device to be used by the elderly patient suffering from motor and cognitive disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelito A. Silverio
- Department of Electronics Engineering, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines
- Research Center for the Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines
- *Correspondence: Angelito A. Silverio,
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tilborghs S, De Wachter S. Sacral neuromodulation for the treatment of overactive bladder: systematic review and future prospects. Expert Rev Med Devices 2022; 19:161-187. [DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2022.2032655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Tilborghs
- Department of Urology, Antwerp University Hospital, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
- Department of Urology, Antwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Centre (ASTARC), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Anatomy, University of Antwerp
| | - Stefan De Wachter
- Department of Urology, Antwerp University Hospital, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
- Department of Urology, Antwerp Surgical Training, Anatomy and Research Centre (ASTARC), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Anatomy, University of Antwerp
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Marceglia S, Guidetti M, Harmsen IE, Loh A, Meoni S, Foffani G, Lozano AM, Volkmann J, Moro E, Priori A. Deep brain stimulation: is it time to change gears by closing the loop? J Neural Eng 2021; 18. [PMID: 34678794 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac3267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective.Adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) is a form of invasive stimulation that was conceived to overcome the technical limitations of traditional DBS, which delivers continuous stimulation of the target structure without considering patients' symptoms or status in real-time. Instead, aDBS delivers on-demand, contingency-based stimulation. So far, aDBS has been tested in several neurological conditions, and will be soon extensively studied to translate it into clinical practice. However, an exhaustive description of technical aspects is still missing.Approach.in this topical review, we summarize the knowledge about the current (and future) aDBS approach and control algorithms to deliver the stimulation, as reference for a deeper undestending of aDBS model.Main results.We discuss the conceptual and functional model of aDBS, which is based on the sensing module (that assesses the feedback variable), the control module (which interpretes the variable and elaborates the new stimulation parameters), and the stimulation module (that controls the delivery of stimulation), considering both the historical perspective and the state-of-the-art of available biomarkers.Significance.aDBS modulates neuronal circuits based on clinically relevant biofeedback signals in real-time. First developed in the mid-2000s, many groups have worked on improving closed-loop DBS technology. The field is now at a point in conducting large-scale randomized clinical trials to translate aDBS into clinical practice. As we move towards implanting brain-computer interfaces in patients, it will be important to understand the technical aspects of aDBS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Marceglia
- Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy
| | - Matteo Guidetti
- Aldo Ravelli Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Neurotherapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142 Milan, Italy.,Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Irene E Harmsen
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aaron Loh
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sara Meoni
- Aldo Ravelli Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Neurotherapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142 Milan, Italy.,Movement Disorders Unit, Division of Neurology, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences, INSERM U1216, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Guglielmo Foffani
- HM CINAC (Centro Integral de Neurociencias Abarca Campal), Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain.,Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos, SESCAM, Toledo, Spain
| | - Andres M Lozano
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jens Volkmann
- Department of Neurology, University of Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany
| | - Elena Moro
- Movement Disorders Unit, Division of Neurology, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences, INSERM U1216, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Alberto Priori
- Aldo Ravelli Research Center for Neurotechnology and Experimental Neurotherapeutics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142 Milan, Italy.,ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, 20142 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sarica C, Iorio-Morin C, Aguirre-Padilla DH, Najjar A, Paff M, Fomenko A, Yamamoto K, Zemmar A, Lipsman N, Ibrahim GM, Hamani C, Hodaie M, Lozano AM, Munhoz RP, Fasano A, Kalia SK. Implantable Pulse Generators for Deep Brain Stimulation: Challenges, Complications, and Strategies for Practicality and Longevity. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:708481. [PMID: 34512295 PMCID: PMC8427803 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.708481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) represents an important treatment modality for movement disorders and other circuitopathies. Despite their miniaturization and increasing sophistication, DBS systems share a common set of components of which the implantable pulse generator (IPG) is the core power supply and programmable element. Here we provide an overview of key hardware and software specifications of commercially available IPG systems such as rechargeability, MRI compatibility, electrode configuration, pulse delivery, IPG case architecture, and local field potential sensing. We present evidence-based approaches to mitigate hardware complications, of which infection represents the most important factor. Strategies correlating positively with decreased complications include antibiotic impregnation and co-administration and other surgical considerations during IPG implantation such as the use of tack-up sutures and smaller profile devices.Strategies aimed at maximizing battery longevity include patient-related elements such as reliability of IPG recharging or consistency of nightly device shutoff, and device-specific such as parameter delivery, choice of lead configuration, implantation location, and careful selection of electrode materials to minimize impedance mismatch. Finally, experimental DBS systems such as ultrasound, magnetoelectric nanoparticles, and near-infrared that use extracorporeal powered neuromodulation strategies are described as potential future directions for minimally invasive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Can Sarica
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Christian Iorio-Morin
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - David H Aguirre-Padilla
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, Center Campus, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Ahmed Najjar
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Taibah University, Almadinah Almunawwarah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Michelle Paff
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Anton Fomenko
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kazuaki Yamamoto
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ajmal Zemmar
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Neurosurgery, Henan University School of Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.,Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States
| | - Nir Lipsman
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - George M Ibrahim
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Clement Hamani
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Harquail Centre for Neuromodulation, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mojgan Hodaie
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,CRANIA Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andres M Lozano
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,CRANIA Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Renato P Munhoz
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, and Division of Neurology, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alfonso Fasano
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,CRANIA Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.,Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, and Division of Neurology, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Suneil K Kalia
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,CRANIA Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.,KITE, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pio-Lopez L, Poulkouras R, Depannemaecker D. Visual cortical prosthesis: an electrical perspective. J Med Eng Technol 2021; 45:394-407. [PMID: 33843427 DOI: 10.1080/03091902.2021.1907468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
The electrical stimulation of the visual cortices has the potential to restore vision to blind individuals. Until now, the results of visual cortical prosthetics have been limited as no prosthesis has restored a full working vision but the field has shown a renewed interest these last years, thanks to wireless and technological advances. However, several scientific and technical challenges are still open to achieve the therapeutic benefit expected by these new devices. One of the main challenges is the electrical stimulation of the brain itself. In this review, we analyse the results in electrode-based visual cortical prosthetics from the electrical point of view. We first describe what is known about the electrode-tissue interface and safety of electrical stimulation. Then we focus on the psychophysics of prosthetic vision and the state-of-the-art on the interplay between the electrical stimulation of the visual cortex and the phosphene perception. Lastly, we discuss the challenges and perspectives of visual cortex electrical stimulation and electrode array design to develop the new generation implantable cortical visual prostheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Romanos Poulkouras
- Department of Bioelectronics, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines, CMP-EMSE, Gardanne, France.,Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone, UMR 7289, CNRS, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Damien Depannemaecker
- Department of Integrative and Computational Neuroscience, Paris-Saclay Institute of Neuroscience, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Evers J, Lowery M. The Active Electrode in the Living Brain: The Response of the Brain Parenchyma to Chronically Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2021; 20:131-140. [PMID: 33074305 DOI: 10.1093/ons/opaa326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation is an established symptomatic surgical therapy for Parkinson disease, essential tremor, and a number of other movement and neuropsychiatric disorders. The well-established foreign body response around implanted electrodes is marked by gliosis, neuroinflammation, and neurodegeneration. However, how this response changes with the application of chronic stimulation is less well-understood. OBJECTIVE To integrate the most recent evidence from basic science, patient, and postmortem studies on the effect of such an "active" electrode on the parenchyma of the living brain. METHODS A thorough and in-part systematic literature review identified 49 papers. RESULTS Increased electrode-tissue impedance is consistently observed in the weeks following electrode implantation, stabilizing at approximately 3 to 6 mo. Lower impedance values are observed around stimulated implanted electrodes when compared with unstimulated electrodes. A temporary reduction in impedance has also been observed in response to stimulation in nonhuman primates. Postmortem studies from patients confirm the presence of a fibrous sheath, astrocytosis, neuronal loss, and neuroinflammation in the immediate vicinity of the electrode. When comparing stimulated and unstimulated electrodes directly, there is some evidence across animal and patient studies of altered neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation around stimulated electrodes. CONCLUSION Establishing how stimulation influences the electrical and histological properties of the surrounding tissue is critical in understanding how these factors contribute to DBS efficacy, and in controlling symptoms and side effects. Understanding these complex issues will aid in the development of future neuromodulation systems that are optimized for the tissue environment and required stimulation protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith Evers
- School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,CÚRAM SFI Research Centre for Medical Devices, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Madeleine Lowery
- School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,CÚRAM SFI Research Centre for Medical Devices, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schiavone G, Kang X, Fallegger F, Gandar J, Courtine G, Lacour SP. Guidelines to Study and Develop Soft Electrode Systems for Neural Stimulation. Neuron 2020; 108:238-258. [PMID: 33120021 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Electrical stimulation of nervous structures is a widely used experimental and clinical method to probe neural circuits, perform diagnostics, or treat neurological disorders. The recent introduction of soft materials to design electrodes that conform to and mimic neural tissue led to neural interfaces with improved functionality and biointegration. The shift from stiff to soft electrode materials requires adaptation of the models and characterization methods to understand and predict electrode performance. This guideline aims at providing (1) an overview of the most common techniques to test soft electrodes in vitro and in vivo; (2) a step-by-step design of a complete study protocol, from the lab bench to in vivo experiments; (3) a case study illustrating the characterization of soft spinal electrodes in rodents; and (4) examples of how interpreting characterization data can inform experimental decisions. Comprehensive characterization is paramount to advancing soft neurotechnology that meets the requisites for long-term functionality in vivo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Schiavone
- Bertarelli Foundation Chair in Neuroprosthetic Technology, Laboratory for Soft Bioelectronic Interfaces, Institute of Microengineering, Institute of Bioengineering, Centre for Neuroprosthetics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Xiaoyang Kang
- Bertarelli Foundation Chair in Neuroprosthetic Technology, Laboratory for Soft Bioelectronic Interfaces, Institute of Microengineering, Institute of Bioengineering, Centre for Neuroprosthetics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Florian Fallegger
- Bertarelli Foundation Chair in Neuroprosthetic Technology, Laboratory for Soft Bioelectronic Interfaces, Institute of Microengineering, Institute of Bioengineering, Centre for Neuroprosthetics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jérôme Gandar
- Center for Neuroprosthetics and Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Grégoire Courtine
- Center for Neuroprosthetics and Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; Defitech Center for Interventional Neurotherapies (NeuroRestore), Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Stéphanie P Lacour
- Bertarelli Foundation Chair in Neuroprosthetic Technology, Laboratory for Soft Bioelectronic Interfaces, Institute of Microengineering, Institute of Bioengineering, Centre for Neuroprosthetics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Krauss JK, Lipsman N, Aziz T, Boutet A, Brown P, Chang JW, Davidson B, Grill WM, Hariz MI, Horn A, Schulder M, Mammis A, Tass PA, Volkmann J, Lozano AM. Technology of deep brain stimulation: current status and future directions. Nat Rev Neurol 2020; 17:75-87. [PMID: 33244188 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-020-00426-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 314] [Impact Index Per Article: 78.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neurosurgical procedure that allows targeted circuit-based neuromodulation. DBS is a standard of care in Parkinson disease, essential tremor and dystonia, and is also under active investigation for other conditions linked to pathological circuitry, including major depressive disorder and Alzheimer disease. Modern DBS systems, borrowed from the cardiac field, consist of an intracranial electrode, an extension wire and a pulse generator, and have evolved slowly over the past two decades. Advances in engineering and imaging along with an improved understanding of brain disorders are poised to reshape how DBS is viewed and delivered to patients. Breakthroughs in electrode and battery designs, stimulation paradigms, closed-loop and on-demand stimulation, and sensing technologies are expected to enhance the efficacy and tolerability of DBS. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the technical development of DBS, from its origins to its future. Understanding the evolution of DBS technology helps put the currently available systems in perspective and allows us to predict the next major technological advances and hurdles in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joachim K Krauss
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Nir Lipsman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tipu Aziz
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alexandre Boutet
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Brown
- Medical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jin Woo Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Benjamin Davidson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Warren M Grill
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Marwan I Hariz
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Umea, Umea, Sweden
| | - Andreas Horn
- Department of Neurology, Movement Disorders and Neuromodulation Section, Charité Medicine University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Schulder
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY, USA
| | - Antonios Mammis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Peter A Tass
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jens Volkmann
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Andres M Lozano
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kern DS, Fasano A, Thompson JA, Abosch A, Ojemann S, Munhoz RP. Constant Current versus Constant Voltage: Clinical Evidence Supporting a Fundamental Difference in the Modalities. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2020; 99:171-175. [PMID: 33227781 DOI: 10.1159/000510803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective surgical treatment for movement disorders. Early versions of implantable systems delivered stimulation with constant voltage (CV); however, advances in available and newer platforms have permitted programming in constant current (CC). From a treatment management perspective, there are theoretical advantages of CC stimulation. In this case series, we present clinical evidence supporting the maintenance of current regardless of changes to impedance. MATERIALS AND METHODS This case series included 3 patients with Parkinson's disease status post-bilateral subthalamic nucleus DBS. Patients in this series self-reported intermittent diplopia with pressure applied to the scalp. Patients were subsequently examined and converted from CV to CC and re-examined. Impedances were checked prior to and after conversion from CV to CC as well as while applying pressure to the scalp that induced the adverse effects. RESULTS Across patients, we observed that compression of the scalp overlying the connector, while patients were maintained in CV, consistently and objectively induced unilateral adduction of an eye. In addition, during scalp compression, while in CV, impedance was reduced, which would increase current delivery. Converting the patients to CC stimulation without changing other stimulation parameters eliminated diplopia and objective findings of eye deviation with compression of the scalp overlying the hardware despite changes in impedance. CONCLUSIONS In this case series, we provide clinical support for the principal differences between CV and CC stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Drew S Kern
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA, .,Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA,
| | - Alfonso Fasano
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, UHN, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Neurology, Krembil Brain Institute, Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application (CRANIA), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John A Thompson
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Aviva Abosch
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Steve Ojemann
- Department of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Renato P Munhoz
- Edmond J. Safra Program in Parkinson's Disease, Morton and Gloria Shulman Movement Disorders Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, UHN, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Neurology, Krembil Brain Institute, Center for Advancing Neurotechnological Innovation to Application (CRANIA), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pintér D, Janszky J, Kovács N. Minimal Clinically Important Differences for
Burke‐Fahn‐Marsden
Dystonia Rating Scale and
36‐Item Short‐Form
Health Survey. Mov Disord 2020; 35:1218-1223. [DOI: 10.1002/mds.28057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Revised: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Dávid Pintér
- Department of Neurology, Medical SchoolUniversity of Pécs Pécs Hungary
| | - József Janszky
- Department of Neurology, Medical SchoolUniversity of Pécs Pécs Hungary
- MTA‐PTE Clinical Neuroscience MR Research Group Pécs Hungary
| | - Norbert Kovács
- Department of Neurology, Medical SchoolUniversity of Pécs Pécs Hungary
- MTA‐PTE Clinical Neuroscience MR Research Group Pécs Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Blok B, Van Kerrebroeck P, de Wachter S, Ruffion A, Van der Aa F, Perrouin-Verbe MA, Elneil S. Two-year safety and efficacy outcomes for the treatment of overactive bladder using a long-lived rechargeable sacral neuromodulation system. Neurourol Urodyn 2020; 39:1108-1114. [PMID: 32243625 PMCID: PMC7217215 DOI: 10.1002/nau.24317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) therapy for overactive bladder (OAB) has proven long-term safety and efficacy. Historically, the only commercially available SNM device was nonrechargeable requiring replacement surgery due to battery depletion. The Axonics System is the first rechargeable SNM device and is qualified to last a minimum of 15 years in the body. The study objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this rechargeable SNM system. This study reports 2-year outcomes. METHODS A total of 51 subjects were implanted with the Axonics System in a single nonstaged procedure. Subjects had OAB, confirmed on a 3-day voiding diary (≥8 voids/day and/or ≥2 incontinence episodes over 72 hours). Test Responders were defined as subjects that were responders at 1 month postimplant. The efficacy analysis included therapy responder rates, change in the quality of life, and subject satisfaction reported in Test Responders (n = 30) and all implanted subjects (n = 37) that completed the follow-up visits. Adverse events (AEs) are reported in all implanted subjects. RESULTS At 2 years, 90% of the Test Responders continued to respond to the therapy based on voiding diary criteria. Satisfaction with therapy was reported by 93% of subjects and 86% found their charging experience acceptable. Of the urinary incontinence Test Responders, 88% continued to be responders at 2 years, and 28% were completely dry. There were no unanticipated (AEs) or serious device-related AEs. CONCLUSIONS The Axonics System® provides sustained clinically meaningful improvements in OAB subjects at 2 years. There were no serious device-related AEs. Subjects reported continued satisfaction with their therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bertil Blok
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Van Kerrebroeck
- Department of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Alain Ruffion
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France
| | | | | | - Sohier Elneil
- Department of Uro-Neurology, National Hospital of Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wong JK, Hess CW, Almeida L, Middlebrooks EH, Christou EA, Patrick EE, Shukla AW, Foote KD, Okun MS. Deep brain stimulation in essential tremor: targets, technology, and a comprehensive review of clinical outcomes. Expert Rev Neurother 2020; 20:319-331. [PMID: 32116065 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2020.1737017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Essential tremor (ET) is a common movement disorder with an estimated prevalence of 0.9% worldwide. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established therapy for medication refractory and debilitating tremor. With the arrival of next generation technology, the implementation and delivery of DBS has been rapidly evolving. This review will highlight the current applications and constraints for DBS in ET.Areas covered: The mechanism of action, targets for neuromodulation, next generation guidance techniques, symptom-specific applications, and long-term efficacy will be reviewed.Expert opinion: The posterior subthalamic area and zona incerta are alternative targets to thalamic DBS in ET. However, they may be associated with additional stimulation-induced side effects. Novel stimulation paradigms and segmented electrodes provide innovative approaches to DBS programming and stimulation-induced side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua K Wong
- Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Christopher W Hess
- Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Leonardo Almeida
- Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Evangelos A Christou
- Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Erin E Patrick
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Aparna Wagle Shukla
- Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Kelly D Foote
- Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Michael S Okun
- Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Eleopra R, Rinaldo S, Devigili G, Lettieri C, Mondani M, D'Auria S, Piacentino M, Pilleri M. Brain impedance variation of directional leads implanted in subthalamic nuclei of Parkinsonian patients. Clin Neurophysiol 2019; 130:1562-1569. [PMID: 31301634 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2018] [Revised: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Conventional deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems with ring-shaped leads generate spherical electrical fields. In contrast, novel directional leads use segmented electrodes. Aim of this study was to quantify the impedance variations over time in subjects with the directional Cartesia-Boston® system. METHODS Impedance records, programming settings, and clinical data of 11 consecutive Parkinsonian patients implanted with DBS directional leads in two Italian centers (Udine and Vicenza) were retrospectively evaluated. Data were collected before starting stimulation (in the operating room and at days 5 and 40) and after switching stimulation on at the successive follow-up visits (1, 6 and 12 months). RESULTS Directional leads have significantly higher impedance than ring leads. Stimulated contacts had always lower impedance compared to non-stimulated contacts. Before DBS-on, all contacts had higher impedance in the operating room, with an initial decrease five days post-surgery and a subsequent increase at day 40, more evident for directional contacts. The impedance of directional leads increased post-implantation at 1 and 6 months with a plateau at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS There was a significant difference between the directional and ring leads at baseline (before activation of DBS) and during follow-up (chronic DBS). SIGNIFICANCE Our study reveals new information about the impedance of segmented electrodes that is useful for patient management during the initial test period, as well as during long-term DBS follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Eleopra
- Neurological Unit I, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy.
| | - Sara Rinaldo
- Neurological Unit I, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy
| | - Grazia Devigili
- Neurological Unit I, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy
| | - Christian Lettieri
- Neurological Unit, S. Maria della Misericordia Universital Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Massimo Mondani
- Neurosurgical Unit, S. Maria della Misericordia Universital Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Stanislao D'Auria
- Neurosurgical Unit, S. Maria della Misericordia Universital Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Manuela Pilleri
- Neurological Unit, Villa Margherita Hospital, Arcugnano, Vicenza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Koeglsperger T, Palleis C, Hell F, Mehrkens JH, Bötzel K. Deep Brain Stimulation Programming for Movement Disorders: Current Concepts and Evidence-Based Strategies. Front Neurol 2019; 10:410. [PMID: 31231293 PMCID: PMC6558426 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become the treatment of choice for advanced stages of Parkinson's disease, medically intractable essential tremor, and complicated segmental and generalized dystonia. In addition to accurate electrode placement in the target area, effective programming of DBS devices is considered the most important factor for the individual outcome after DBS. Programming of the implanted pulse generator (IPG) is the only modifiable factor once DBS leads have been implanted and it becomes even more relevant in cases in which the electrodes are located at the border of the intended target structure and when side effects become challenging. At present, adjusting stimulation parameters depends to a large extent on personal experience. Based on a comprehensive literature search, we here summarize previous studies that examined the significance of distinct stimulation strategies for ameliorating disease signs and symptoms. We assess the effect of adjusting the stimulus amplitude (A), frequency (f), and pulse width (pw) on clinical symptoms and examine more recent techniques for modulating neuronal elements by electrical stimulation, such as interleaving (Medtronic®) or directional current steering (Boston Scientific®, Abbott®). We thus provide an evidence-based strategy for achieving the best clinical effect with different disorders and avoiding adverse effects in DBS of the subthalamic nucleus (STN), the ventro-intermedius nucleus (VIM), and the globus pallidus internus (GPi).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Koeglsperger
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.,Department of Translational Neurodegeneration, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Carla Palleis
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.,Department of Translational Neurodegeneration, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Franz Hell
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.,Graduate School of Systemic Neurosciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Jan H Mehrkens
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Kai Bötzel
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cury RG, Kalia SK, Shah BB, Jimenez-Shahed J, Prashanth LK, Moro E. Surgical treatment of dystonia. Expert Rev Neurother 2018; 18:477-492. [PMID: 29781334 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2018.1478288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment of dystonia should be individualized and tailored to the specific needs of patients. Surgical treatment is an important option in medically refractory cases. Several issues regarding type of the surgical intervention, targets, and predict factors of benefit are still under debate. Areas covered: To date, several clinical trials have proven the benefit and safety of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for inherited and idiopathic isolated dystonia, whereas there is still insufficient evidence in combined and acquired dystonia. The globus pallidus internus (GPi) is the target with the best evidence, but data on the subthalamic nucleus seems also to be promising. Evidence suggests that younger patients with shorter disease duration experience greater benefit following DBS. Pallidotomy and thalamotomy are currently used in subset of carefully selected patients. The development of MRI-guided focused ultrasound might bring new options to ablation approach in dystonia. Expert commentary: GPi-DBS is effective and safe in isolated dystonia and should not be delayed when symptoms compromise quality of life and functionality. Identifying the best candidates to surgery on acquired and combined dystonias is still necessary. New insights about pathophysiology of dystonia and new technological advances will undoubtedly help to tailor surgery and optimize clinical effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rubens Gisbert Cury
- a Service de Neurologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble , Université Grenoble Alpes , Grenoble , France.,b Department of Neurology, School of Medicine , University of São Paulo , São Paulo , Brazil
| | - Suneil Kumar Kalia
- c Division of Neurosurgery and Krembil Research Institute, Department of Surgery , University of Toronto , Toronto , Canada
| | - Binit Bipin Shah
- d Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Center, Department of Neurology , University of Virginia , Charlottesville , VA , USA
| | - Joohi Jimenez-Shahed
- e Parkinson's Disease Center and Movement Disorders Clinic , Baylor College of Medicine , Houston , TX , USA
| | | | - Elena Moro
- a Service de Neurologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble , Université Grenoble Alpes , Grenoble , France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Di Lauro M, Benaglia S, Berto M, Bortolotti CA, Zoli M, Biscarini F. Exploiting interfacial phenomena in organic bioelectronics: Conformable devices for bidirectional communication with living systems. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2018; 168:143-147. [PMID: 29588094 DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2017] [Revised: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 03/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
A novel fully organic bioelectronic device is presented and validated as electronic transducer and current stimulator for brain implants. The device integrates polymeric electrodes made of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) on paper thin foils, resulting in a high surface-to-volume ratio architecture that exhibits high sensitivity to interfacial ionic transport phenomena. The prototyping technique herein presented yields devices for the bidirectional communication with biological systems whose dimensionality can be controlled according to the desired application. Transduction of ultra-low local-field potentials and delivery of voltage pulse-trains alike those used in deep-brain stimulation are herein assessed, paving the way towards novel theranostic strategies for the treatment of Parkinson's Disease and other severe neurodegenerative and/or traumatic pathologies of the central nervous system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Di Lauro
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Via Campi 103, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Simone Benaglia
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Via Campi 103, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Marcello Berto
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Via Campi 103, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Carlo A Bortolotti
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Via Campi 103, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Michele Zoli
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Metaboliche e Neuroscienze, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Via Campi 287, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Fabio Biscarini
- Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Via Campi 103, 41125 Modena, Italy; Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia - Center for Translational Neurophysiology, Via Fossato di Mortara 17-19, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Schmidt C, van Rienen U. Adaptive Estimation of the Neural Activation Extent in Computational Volume Conductor Models of Deep Brain Stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2017; 65:1828-1839. [PMID: 29989959 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2017.2758324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to propose an adaptive scheme embedded into an open-source environment for the estimation of the neural activation extent during deep brain stimulation and to investigate the feasibility of approximating the neural activation extent by thresholds of the field solution. METHODS Open-source solutions for solving the field equation in volume conductor models of deep brain stimulation and computing the neural activation are embedded into a Python package to estimate the neural activation dependent on the dielectric tissue properties and axon parameters by employing a spatially adaptive scheme. Feasibility of the approximation of the neural activation extent by field thresholds is investigated to further reduce the computational expense. RESULTS The varying extents of neural activation for different patient-specific dielectric properties were estimated with the adaptive scheme. The results revealed the strong influence of the dielectric properties of the encapsulation layer in the acute and chronic phase after surgery. The computational time required to determine the neural activation extent in each studied model case was substantially reduced. CONCLUSION The neural activation extent is altered by patient-specific parameters. Threshold values of the electric potential and electric field norm facilitate a computationally efficient method to estimate the neural activation extent. SIGNIFICANCE The presented adaptive scheme is able to robustly determine neural activation extents and field threshold estimates for varying dielectric tissue properties and axon diameters while substantially reducing the computational expense.
Collapse
|
22
|
Deeb W, Patel A, Okun MS, Gunduz A. Management of Elevated Therapeutic Impedances on Deep Brain Stimulation Leads. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2017; 7:493. [PMID: 28983423 PMCID: PMC5628334 DOI: 10.7916/d8br94mv] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 08/25/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023] Open
Abstract
CLINICAL VIGNETTE A 64-year-old male with a history of essential tremor with bilateral thalamic ventralis intermedius deep brain stimulation implants had elevated therapeutic impedance values despite normal lead integrity impedances and good response to stimulation. CLINICAL DILEMMA Do elevated therapeutic impedance values indicate a sign of hardware malfunction? What are the guidelines to approach deep brain stimulation hardware malfunction? CLINICAL SOLUTION Lead integrity impedance values are a better evaluation of hardware integrity. The discrepancy between therapeutic and lead-integrity impedance values can arise when using low voltage settings. GAPS IN KNOWLEDGE There are no established guidelines for the management of possible hardware malfunction in deep brain stimulation. The recommended approach is to distinguish between open and short circuit problems followed by an "inching" evaluation, assessing the structures from the implantable and programmable generator to the intracranial leads. Constant-current devices will deliver a more stable stimulation but the effect of their adoption is still not clear. EXPERT COMMENTARY This case emphasizes the need for clinicians to understand fundamental differences in lead integrity and therapeutic impedance while utilizing a methodical approach in treating hardware malfunction. It highlights future avenues of investigation regarding the utility of constant current DBS technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wissam Deeb
- Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Amar Patel
- Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Michael S. Okun
- Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Parastarfeizabadi M, Kouzani AZ. Advances in closed-loop deep brain stimulation devices. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2017; 14:79. [PMID: 28800738 PMCID: PMC5553781 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-017-0295-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2017] [Accepted: 08/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Millions of patients around the world are affected by neurological and psychiatric disorders. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a device-based therapy that could have fewer side-effects and higher efficiencies in drug-resistant patients compared to other therapeutic options such as pharmacological approaches. Thus far, several efforts have been made to incorporate a feedback loop into DBS devices to make them operate in a closed-loop manner. METHODS This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the existing research-based and commercial closed-loop DBS devices. It describes a brief history of closed-loop DBS techniques, biomarkers and algorithms used for closing the feedback loop, components of the current research-based and commercial closed-loop DBS devices, and advancements and challenges in this field of research. This review also includes a comparison of the closed-loop DBS devices and provides the future directions of this area of research. RESULTS Although we are in the early stages of the closed-loop DBS approach, there have been fruitful efforts in design and development of closed-loop DBS devices. To date, only one commercial closed-loop DBS device has been manufactured. However, this system does not have an intelligent and patient dependent control algorithm. A closed-loop DBS device requires a control algorithm to learn and optimize the stimulation parameters according to the brain clinical state. CONCLUSIONS The promising clinical effects of open-loop DBS have been demonstrated, indicating DBS as a pioneer technology and treatment option to serve neurological patients. However, like other commercial devices, DBS needs to be automated and modernized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Abbas Z. Kouzani
- School of Engineering, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sakas DE, Leonardos A, Boviatsis E, Gatzonis S, Panourias I, Stathis P, Stavrinou LC. Constant-Current Deep Brain Stimulation of the Globus Pallidus Internus in the Treatment of Primary Dystonia by a Novel 8-Contact (Octrode) Lead. World Neurosurg 2017; 103:45-56. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2016] [Revised: 03/19/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
25
|
Dupre DA, Nangunoori R, Koduri S, Angle C, Cantella D, Whiting D. Disease Stabilization of DYT1-Positive Primary Generalized Dystonia With Deep Brain Stimulation of the Globus Pallidus Interna: A 15-Year Follow-up. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2017; 14:597. [DOI: 10.1093/ons/opx137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2016] [Accepted: 05/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE
Primary generalized dystonia (PGD) is a genetic form of dystonia that frequently displays pharmacological resistance and progresses quickly after onset. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been used successfully to treat refractory dystonia, specifically globus pallidus interna (GPi) DBS for DYT1-positive PGD patients. Long-term follow-up of the safety and efficacy falls short of the longevity seen in other diseases treated with DBS.
CASE PRESENTATION
A male patient presented for neurosurgical evaluation with scapular winging, hand contractures, and violent truncal spasms, which forced him to be bedridden. After failing conservative therapy, the 18-yr-old patient was implanted with bilateral GPi-DBS. DBS parameter adjustments were made primarily within the first 3 yr after implantation, with nominal changes thereafter. Initial settings were contact of 3 + 0−, amplitude of 4.9 V, frequency of 185 Hz, and pulse width of 270 μsec on the left and 3 + 0−, 2.8 V, 185 Hz, and 120 μsec on the right. Current settings are 3 + 2 + 1−, 5.2 V, 130 Hz, 330 μsec on the left and 3 + 0−, 3.5 V, 185 Hz, and 180 μsec on the right and have been relatively unchanged in the past 4 yr. Unified dystonia rating scale scores reveal a significant decrease in dystonic symptoms.
CONCLUSION
While prior reports have shown that GPi-DBS is effective for dystonia, this is the first with 15 yr of long-term follow-up showing disease stabilization, suggesting that stimulation is efficacious and can potentially prevent disease progression. This report reaffirms previous reports that recommend early surgical intervention before the onset of permanent musculoskeletal deficits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derrick A Dupre
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Raj Nangunoori
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sravanthi Koduri
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Cindy Angle
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Diane Cantella
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Donald Whiting
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Environmental Factors That Influence Stem Cell Migration: An "Electric Field". Stem Cells Int 2017; 2017:4276927. [PMID: 28588621 PMCID: PMC5447312 DOI: 10.1155/2017/4276927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2017] [Revised: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 04/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Environmental Stimulus of Electric Fields on Stem Cell Migration. The movement of cells in response to electric potential gradients is called galvanotaxis. In vivo galvanotaxis, powered by endogenous electric fields (EFs), plays a critical role during development and wound healing. This review aims to provide a perspective on how stem cells transduce EFs into directed migration and an understanding of the current literature relating to the mechanisms by which cells sense and transduce EFs. We will comment on potential EF-based regenerative medicine therapeutics.
Collapse
|
27
|
Cossu G, Sensi M. Deep Brain Stimulation Emergencies: How the New Technologies Could Modify the Current Scenario. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2017; 17:51. [PMID: 28497305 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-017-0761-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
After 25 years of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of Parkinson's disease, it has become increasingly recognized that a range of postoperative urgent situations and emergencies may occur. In this review we describe the possible scenarios of DBS-related emergencies: perioperative (intraoperative and early postoperative) and postoperative settings and issues from suboptimal control of motor and nonmotor symptoms in the early programming phase and during long-term follow-up. We also outline potential advantages in the management of these emergencies offered by the newest devices, emerging technologies, and new possibilities in programming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Cossu
- Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neurology, Brotzu General Hospital, Piazzale Ricchi 1, 09134, Cagliari, Italy.
| | - Mariachiara Sensi
- Department of Neurology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Arcispedale Sant'Anna, Ferrara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rezaei Haddad A, Samuel M, Hulse N, Lin HY, Ashkan K. Long-Term Efficacy of Constant Current Deep Brain Stimulation in Essential Tremor. Neuromodulation 2017; 20:437-443. [PMID: 28326650 DOI: 10.1111/ner.12592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2016] [Revised: 12/30/2016] [Accepted: 01/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Ventralis intermedius deep brain stimulation is an established intervention for medication-refractory essential tremor. Newer constant current stimulation technology offers theoretical advantage over the traditional constant voltage systems in terms of delivering a more biologically stable therapy. There are no previous reports on the outcomes of constant current deep brain stimulation in the treatment of essential tremor. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of ventralis intermedius constant current deep brain stimulation in patients diagnosed with essential tremor. MATERIALS AND METHODS Essential tremor patients implanted with constant current deep brain stimulation for a minimum of three years were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale at baseline and postoperatively at the time of evaluation. The quality of life in the patients was assessed using the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor questionnaire. RESULTS Ten patients were evaluated with a median age at evaluation of 74 years (range 66-79) and a mean follow up time of 49.7 (range 36-78) months since starting stimulation. Constant current ventralis intermedius deep brain stimulation was well tolerated and effective in all patients with a mean score improvement from 50.7 ± 5.9 to 17.4 ± 5.7 (p = 0.0020) in the total Fahn-Tolosa-Marin rating scale score (65.6%). Furthermore, the total combined mean Quality of Life in Essential Tremor score was improved from 56.2 ± 4.9 to 16.8 ± 3.5 (p value = 0.0059) (70.1%). CONCLUSION This report shows that long-term constant current ventralis intermedius deep brain stimulation is a safe and effective intervention for essential tremor patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Rezaei Haddad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kings College Hospital, London, UK.,Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Michael Samuel
- Department of Neurology, National Parkinson Foundation International Centre of Excellence, King's College Hospital, King's Health Partners, London, UK
| | - Natasha Hulse
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kings College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Hsin-Ying Lin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kings College Hospital, London, UK.,Department of Neurosurgery, Wan Fang Medical Center, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Affiliation(s)
- A H V Schapira
- Clinical Neurosciences, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Establishing a Standard of Care for Deep Brain Stimulation Centers in Canada. Can J Neurol Sci 2016; 44:132-138. [PMID: 27873569 DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2016.409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AbstractDuring the “DBS Canada Day” symposium held in Toronto July 4-5, 2014, the scientific committee invited experts to share their knowledge regarding deep brain stimulation (DBS) management of movement disorders in three domains: (1) the programming algorithms, (2) the necessary team to run a neurosurgery program, and (3) the appropriate scales to better define in a more comprehensive fashion the effect of the brain surgery. Each presentation was followed by an open discussion, and this article reports on the conclusions of this meeting on these three questions. Concerning programming, the role of the pulse width and the switching off of the stimulation at night for thalamic stimulation for the control of tremor have been discussed. The algorithms proposed in the literature for programming in Parkinson’s disease (PD) need validation. In dystonia, the use of monopolar vs bipolar parameters, the use of low vs high frequencies and the use of smaller versus larger pulse widths all need to be examined properly. Concerning the necessary team to run a neurosurgical program, recommendations will follow the suggestions for standardized outcome measures. Regarding the outcome measures for DBS in PD, investigations need to focus on the non-motor aspects of PD. Identifying which nonmotor symptoms respond to DBS would allow a better screening before and satisfaction postoperatively. There is an important need for more data to determine the optimal programming protocol and the standard measures that should be performed routinely by all centers.
Collapse
|
31
|
Ughratdar I, Samuel M, Ashkan K. Technological Advances in Deep Brain Stimulation. JOURNAL OF PARKINSONS DISEASE 2016; 5:483-96. [PMID: 26406128 DOI: 10.3233/jpd-150579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Functional and stereotactic neurosurgery has always been regarded as a subspecialty based on and driven by technological advances. However until recently, the fundamentals of deep brain stimulation (DBS) hardware and software design had largely remained stagnant since its inception almost three decades ago. Recent improved understanding of disease processes in movement disorders as well clinician and patient demands has resulted in new avenues of development for DBS technology. This review describes new advances both related to hardware and software for neuromodulation. New electrode designs with segmented contacts now enable sophisticated shaping and sculpting of the field of stimulation, potentially allowing multi-target stimulation and avoidance of side effects. To avoid lengthy programming sessions utilising multiple lead contacts, new user-friendly software allows for computational modelling and individualised directed programming. Therapy delivery is being improved with the next generation of smaller profile, longer-lasting, re-chargeable implantable pulse generators (IPGs). These include IPGs capable of delivering constant current stimulation or personalised closed-loop adaptive stimulation. Post-implantation Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has long been an issue which has been partially overcome with 'MRI conditional devices' and has enabled verification of DBS lead location. Surgical technique is considering a shift from frame-based to frameless stereotaxy or greater role for robot assisted implantation. The challenge for these contemporary techniques however, will be in demonstrating equivalent safety and accuracy to conventional methods. We also discuss potential future direction utilising wireless technology allowing for miniaturisation of hardware.
Collapse
|
32
|
TODA H, SAIKI H, NISHIDA N, IWASAKI K. Update on Deep Brain Stimulation for Dyskinesia and Dystonia: A Literature Review. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2016; 56:236-48. [PMID: 27053331 PMCID: PMC4870178 DOI: 10.2176/nmc.ra.2016-0002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2016] [Accepted: 03/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been an established surgical treatment option for dyskinesia from Parkinson disease and for dystonia. The present article deals with the timing of surgical intervention, selecting an appropriate target, and minimizing adverse effects. We provide an overview of current evidences and issues for dyskinesia and dystonia as well as emerging DBS technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki TODA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute and Kitano Hospital, Kita, Osaka
| | - Hidemoto SAIKI
- Department of Neurology, Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute and Kitano Hospital, Kita, Osaka
| | - Namiko NISHIDA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute and Kitano Hospital, Kita, Osaka
| | - Koichi IWASAKI
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute and Kitano Hospital, Kita, Osaka
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Picillo M, Lozano AM, Kou N, Puppi Munhoz R, Fasano A. Programming Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: The Toronto Western Hospital Algorithms. Brain Stimul 2016; 9:425-437. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2015] [Revised: 01/02/2016] [Accepted: 02/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
|
34
|
Picillo M, Lozano AM, Kou N, Munhoz RP, Fasano A. Programming Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor and Dystonia: The Toronto Western Hospital Algorithms. Brain Stimul 2016; 9:438-452. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2015] [Revised: 01/02/2016] [Accepted: 02/03/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|
35
|
Mahmud M, Vassanelli S. Differential Modulation of Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons during Periodic Stimulation. Front Neurosci 2016; 10:62. [PMID: 26941602 PMCID: PMC4766297 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2015] [Accepted: 02/09/2016] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-invasive transcranial neuronal stimulation, in addition to deep brain stimulation, is seen as a promising therapeutic and diagnostic approach for an increasing number of neurological diseases such as epilepsy, cluster headaches, depression, specific type of blindness, and other central nervous system disfunctions. Improving its effectiveness and widening its range of use may strongly rely on development of proper stimulation protocols that are tailored to specific brain circuits and that are based on a deep knowledge of different neuron types response to stimulation. To this aim, we have performed a simulation study on the behavior of excitatory and inhibitory neurons subject to sinusoidal stimulation. Due to the intrinsic difference in membrane conductance properties of excitatory and inhibitory neurons, we show that their firing is differentially modulated by the wave parameters. We analyzed the behavior of the two neuronal types for a broad range of stimulus frequency and amplitude and demonstrated that, within a small-world network prototype, parameters tuning allow for a selective enhancement or suppression of the excitation/inhibition ratio.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mufti Mahmud
- NeuroChip Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of PadovaPadova, Italy; Institute of Information Technology, Jahangirnagar UniversitySavar, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Stefano Vassanelli
- NeuroChip Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Preda F, Cavandoli C, Lettieri C, Pilleri M, Antonini A, Eleopra R, Mondani M, Martinuzzi A, Sarubbo S, Ghisellini G, Trezza A, Cavallo MA, Landi A, Sensi M. Switching from constant voltage to constant current in deep brain stimulation: a multicenter experience of mixed implants for movement disorders. Eur J Neurol 2015; 23:190-5. [DOI: 10.1111/ene.12835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2015] [Accepted: 08/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- F. Preda
- Az. Ospedaliero-Universitaria Arcispedale Sant'Anna; Cona Ferrara Italy
| | | | - C. Lettieri
- Az. Ospedaliero-Universitaria Santa Maria della Misericordia - P. le Santa Maria della Misericordia; Udine Italy
| | - M. Pilleri
- IRCCS Ospedale San Camillo; Lido di Venezia Venezia Italy
| | - A. Antonini
- IRCCS Ospedale San Camillo; Lido di Venezia Venezia Italy
| | - R. Eleopra
- Az. Ospedaliero-Universitaria Santa Maria della Misericordia - P. le Santa Maria della Misericordia; Udine Italy
| | - M. Mondani
- Az. Ospedaliero-Universitaria Santa Maria della Misericordia - P. le Santa Maria della Misericordia; Udine Italy
| | - A. Martinuzzi
- IRCCS Eugenio Medea − Polo Scientifico di Conegliano/Pieve di Soligo; Pieve di Soligo TV Italy
| | - S. Sarubbo
- Presidio Ospedaliero S. Chiara; Trento Italy
| | - G. Ghisellini
- Az. Ospedaliero-Universitaria Arcispedale Sant'Anna; Cona Ferrara Italy
| | - A. Trezza
- Az. Ospedaliera San Gerardo; Monza Italy
| | - M. A. Cavallo
- Az. Ospedaliero-Universitaria Arcispedale Sant'Anna; Cona Ferrara Italy
| | - A. Landi
- Az. Ospedaliera San Gerardo; Monza Italy
| | - M. Sensi
- Az. Ospedaliero-Universitaria Arcispedale Sant'Anna; Cona Ferrara Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
|
38
|
Beaulieu-Boire I, Fasano A. Current or voltage? Another Shakespearean dilemma. Eur J Neurol 2014; 22:887-8. [PMID: 25112686 DOI: 10.1111/ene.12537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- I Beaulieu-Boire
- Division of Neurology, Movement Disorders Center, Toronto Western Hospital, UHN, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|