Electroencephalographic reactivity testing in unconscious patients: a systematic review of methods and definitions

Unveiling variability: A systematic review of reproducibility in visual EEG analysis, with focus on seizures

OBJECTIVE

Reproducibility is key for diagnostic tests involving subjective evaluation by experts. Our aim was to systematically review the reproducibility of visual analysis in clinical electroencephalogram (EEG). In this paper, we give data on the scope of EEG features found, and detailed reproducibility data for the most studied feature.

METHODS

We searched four databases for articles reporting reproducibility in clinical EEG, until June 2023. Two raters screened 24 553 citations, and then 2736 full texts. Quality was assessed according to the GRRAS guidelines.

RESULTS

We found 275 studies (268 interrater and 20 intrarater), addressing 606 different EEG features. Only 38 EEG features had been studied in >2 studies. Most studies had <50 patients and EEGs. The most often addressed feature was seizure detection (62 papers). Interrater reproducibility of seizure detection was substantial-to-almost-perfect with experienced raters and raw EEG (kappa .62-.88). With experienced raters and transformed EEG, reproducibility was substantial (kappa .63-.70). Inexperienced raters had lower reproducibility. Seizure lateralization reproducibility was moderate to substantial (kappa .58-.77) but lower than for seizure detection.

SIGNIFICANCE

Most EEG reproducibility studies are done only once. Intrarater studies are rare. The reproducibility of visual EEG analysis is variable. Interrater reproducibility for seizure detection is substantial-to-perfect with experienced raters and raw EEG, less with inexperienced raters or transformed EEG. The results of visual EEG analysis vary within the same rater, and between raters. There is a need for larger collaborative studies, using improved methodology, as well as more intrarater studies of EEG interpretation.

Methods of Evaluating EEG Reactivity in Adult Intensive Care Units: A Review

PURPOSE

EEG reactivity (EEG-R) has become widely used in intensive care units for diagnosing and prognosticating patients with disorders of consciousness. Despite efforts toward standardization, including the establishment of terminology for critical care EEG in 2012, the processes of testing and interpreting EEG-R remain inconsistent.

METHODS

A review was conducted on PubMed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria consisted of articles published between January 2012, and November 2022, testing EEG-R on adult intensive care unit patients. Exclusion criteria included articles focused on highly specialized stimulation equipment or animal, basic science, or small case report studies. The Quality In Prognostic Studies tool was used to assess risk of bias.

RESULTS

One hundred and five articles were identified, with 26 variables collected for each. EEG-R testing varied greatly, including the number of stimuli (range: 1-8; 26 total described), stimulus length (range: 2-30 seconds), length between stimuli (range: 10 seconds-5 minutes), frequency of stimulus application (range: 1-9), frequency of EEG-R testing (range: 1-3 times daily), EEG electrodes (range: 4-64), personnel testing EEG-R (range: neurophysiologists to nonexperts), and sedation protocols (range: discontinuing all sedation to no attempt). EEG-R interpretation widely varied, including EEG-R definitions and grading scales, personnel interpreting EEG-R (range: EEG specialists to nonneurologists), use of quantitative methods, EEG filters, and time to detect EEG-R poststimulation (range: 1-30 seconds).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the persistent heterogeneity of testing and interpreting EEG-R over the past decade, and contributing components were identified. Further many institutional efforts must be made toward standardization, focusing on the reproducibility and unification of these methods, and detailed documentation in the published literature.

Towards an electroencephalographic measure of awareness based on the reactivity of oscillatory macrostates to hearing a subject's own name

We proposed that the brain's electrical activity is composed of a sequence of alternating states with repeating topographic spectral distributions on scalp electroencephalogram (EEG), referred to as oscillatory macrostates. The macrostate showing the largest decrease in the probability of occurrence, measured as a percentage (reactivity), during sensory stimulation was labelled as the default EEG macrostate (DEM). This study aimed to assess the influence of awareness on DEM reactivity (DER). We included 11 middle cerebral artery ischaemic stroke patients with impaired awareness having a median Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 6/15 and a group of 11 matched healthy controls. EEG recordings were carried out during auditory 1 min stimulation epochs repeating either the subject's own name (SON) or the SON in reverse (rSON). The DEM was identified across three SON epochs alternating with three rSON epochs. Compared with the patients, the DEM of controls contained more posterior theta activity reflecting source dipoles that could be mapped in the posterior cingulate cortex. The DER was measured from the 1 min quiet baseline preceding each stimulation epoch. The difference in mean DER between the SON and rSON epochs was measured by the salient EEG reactivity (SER) theoretically ranging from -100% to 100%. The SER was 12.4 ± 2.7% (Mean ± standard error of the mean) in controls and only 1.3 ± 1.9% in the patient group (P < 0.01). The patient SER decreased with the Glasgow Coma Scale. Our data suggest that awareness increases DER to SON as measured by SER.

EEG dynamics induced by zolpidem forecast consciousness evolution in prolonged disorders of consciousness

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether the EEG dynamics induced by zolpidem can predict consciousness evolution in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (PDOC).

METHODS

We conducted a prospective explorative analysis on thirty-six patients with PDOC and eleven healthy controls. The EEG power spectrum was analyzed and categorized into 'ABCD' patterns at baseline and one hour after zolpidem administration at 10 mg. The clinical outcome was defined as consciousness improvement and no improvement six months after enrollment using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) score.

RESULTS

Zolpidem administration significantly increased the EEG power in the delta & theta bands and decreased EEG power in the beta bands in healthy controls. Further follow-up studies indicated that the increased EEG beta-band power induced by zolpidem can predict an improved consciousness six months after enrollment with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.829, the sensitivity of 94.38% and an accuracy of 81.48%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our work revealed that the specific EEG responses to zolpidem can predict consciousness recovery in PDOC patients.

SIGNIFICANCE

The zolpidem-induced specific EEG responses could potentially predict the recovery of PDOC patients, which may help clinicians and patients' families in their decision-making process.

Quantitative analysis of early-stage EEG reactivity predicts awakening and recovery of consciousness in patients with severe brain injury

BACKGROUND

Decisions of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for patients with severe brain injury are often based on prognostic evaluations such as analysis of electroencephalography (EEG) reactivity (EEG-R). However, EEG-R usually relies on visual assessment, which requires neurophysiological expertise and is prone to inter-rater variability. We hypothesised that quantitative analysis of EEG-R obtained 3 days after patient admission can identify new markers of subsequent awakening and consciousness recovery.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study of patients with severe brain injury requiring mechanical ventilation, quantitative EEG-R was assessed using standard 11-lead EEG with frequency-based (power spectral density) and functional connectivity-based (phase-lag index) analyses. Associations between awakening in the intensive care unit (ICU) and reactivity to auditory and nociceptive stimulations were assessed with logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included in-ICU mortality and 3-month Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) score.

RESULTS

Of 116 patients, 86 (74%) awoke in the ICU. Among quantitative EEG-R markers, variation in phase-lag index connectivity in the delta frequency band after noise stimulation was associated with awakening (adjusted odds ratio=0.89, 95% confidence interval: 0.81-0.97, P=0.02 corrected for multiple tests), independently of age, baseline severity, and sedation. This new marker was independently associated with improved 3-month CRS-R (adjusted β=-0.16, standard error 0.075, P=0.048), but not with mortality (adjusted odds ratio=1.08, 95% CI: 0.99-1.18, P=0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

An early-stage quantitative EEG-R marker was independently associated with awakening and 3-month level of consciousness in patients with severe brain injury. This promising marker based on functional connectivity will need external validation before potential integration into a multimodal prognostic model.

Benign EEG for prognostication of favorable outcome after cardiac arrest: A reappraisal

AIM

The current EEG role for prognostication after cardiac arrest (CA) essentially aims at reliably identifying patients with poor prognosis ("highly malignant" patterns, defined by Westhall et al. in 2014). Conversely, "benign EEGs", defined by the absence of elements of "highly malignant" and "malignant" categories, has limited sensitivity in detecting good prognosis. We postulate that a less stringent "benign EEG" definition would improve sensitivity to detect patients with favorable outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospectively assessing our registry of unconscious adults after CA (1.2018-8.2021), we scored EEGs within 72 h after CA using a modified "benign EEG" classification (allowing discontinuity, low-voltage, or reversed anterio-posterior amplitude development), versus Westhall's "benign EEG" classification (not allowing the former items). We compared predictive performances towards good outcome (Cerebral Performance Category 1-2 at 3 months), using 2x2 tables (and binomial 95% confidence intervals) and proportions comparisons.

RESULTS

Among 381 patients (mean age 61.9 ± 15.4 years, 104 (27.2%) females, 240 (62.9%) having cardiac origin), the modified "benign EEG" definition identified a higher number of patients with potential good outcome (252, 66%, vs 163, 43%). Sensitivity of the modified EEG definition was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.92-0.97) vs 0.71 (95% CI: 0.62-0.78) (p < 0.001). Positive predictive values (PPV) were 0.53 (95% CI: 0.46-0.59) versus 0.59 (95% CI: 0.51-0.67; p = 0.17). Similar statistics were observed at definite recording times, and for survivors.

DISCUSSION

The modified "benign EEG" classification demonstrated a markedly higher sensitivity towards favorable outcome, with minor impact on PPV. Adaptation of "benign EEG" criteria may improve efficient identification of patients who may reach a good outcome.

Electroencephalogram in the intensive care unit: a focused look at acute brain injury

Over the past decades, electroencephalography (EEG) has become a widely applied and highly sophisticated brain monitoring tool in a variety of intensive care unit (ICU) settings. The most common indication for EEG monitoring currently is the management of refractory status epilepticus. In addition, a number of studies have associated frequent seizures, including nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), with worsening secondary brain injury and with worse outcomes. With the widespread utilization of EEG (spot and continuous EEG), rhythmic and periodic patterns that do not fulfill strict seizure criteria have been identified, epidemiologically quantified, and linked to pathophysiological events across a wide spectrum of critical and acute illnesses, including acute brain injury. Increasingly, EEG is not just qualitatively described, but also quantitatively analyzed together with other modalities to generate innovative measurements with possible clinical relevance. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge and emerging applications of EEG in the ICU, including seizure detection, ischemia monitoring, detection of cortical spreading depolarizations, assessment of consciousness and prognostication. We also review some technical aspects and challenges of using EEG in the ICU including the logistics of setting up ICU EEG monitoring in resource-limited settings.

Multimodal prediction of residual consciousness in the intensive care unit: the CONNECT-ME study

Functional MRI (fMRI) and EEG may reveal residual consciousness in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC), as reflected by a rapidly expanding literature on chronic DoC. However, acute DoC is rarely investigated, although identifying residual consciousness is key to clinical decision-making in the intensive care unit (ICU). Therefore, the objective of the prospective, observational, tertiary centre cohort, diagnostic phase IIb study 'Consciousness in neurocritical care cohort study using EEG and fMRI' (CONNECT-ME, NCT02644265) was to assess the accuracy of fMRI and EEG to identify residual consciousness in acute DoC in the ICU. Between April 2016 and November 2020, 87 acute DoC patients with traumatic or non-traumatic brain injury were examined with repeated clinical assessments, fMRI and EEG. Resting-state EEG and EEG with external stimulations were evaluated by visual analysis, spectral band analysis and a Support Vector Machine (SVM) consciousness classifier. In addition, within- and between-network resting-state connectivity for canonical resting-state fMRI networks was assessed. Next, we used EEG and fMRI data at study enrolment in two different machine-learning algorithms (Random Forest and SVM with a linear kernel) to distinguish patients in a minimally conscious state or better (≥MCS) from those in coma or unresponsive wakefulness state (≤UWS) at time of study enrolment and at ICU discharge (or before death). Prediction performances were assessed with area under the curve (AUC). Of 87 DoC patients (mean age, 50.0 ± 18 years, 43% female), 51 (59%) were ≤UWS and 36 (41%) were ≥ MCS at study enrolment. Thirty-one (36%) patients died in the ICU, including 28 who had life-sustaining therapy withdrawn. EEG and fMRI predicted consciousness levels at study enrolment and ICU discharge, with maximum AUCs of 0.79 (95% CI 0.77-0.80) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.77-0.80), respectively. Models based on combined EEG and fMRI features predicted consciousness levels at study enrolment and ICU discharge with maximum AUCs of 0.78 (95% CI 0.71-0.86) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.75-0.89), respectively, with improved positive predictive value and sensitivity. Overall, both machine-learning algorithms (SVM and Random Forest) performed equally well. In conclusion, we suggest that acute DoC prediction models in the ICU be based on a combination of fMRI and EEG features, regardless of the machine-learning algorithm used.

Assessment of electroencephalography and event-related potentials in unresponsive patients with brain injury

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the predictors of clinical outcomes in unresponsive patients with acquired brain injuries.

METHODS

Patients with coma or disorders of consciousness were enrolled from August 2019 to March 2021. A retrospective analysis of demographics, etiology, clinical score, diagnosis, electroencephalography (EEG), and event-related potential (ERP) data from 1 week to 2 months after coma onset was conducted. Findings were assessed for predicting favorable outcomes at 6 months post-coma, and functional outcomes were determined using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E).

RESULTS

Of 68 patients, 22 patients had a good neurological outcome at 6 months, while 11 died. Univariate analysis showed that motor response (Motor-R; p < 0.001), EEG pattern (p = 0.015), sleep spindles (p = 0.018), EEG reactivity (EEG-R; p < 0.001), mismatch negativity (MMN) amplitude at electrode Fz (FzMMNA; p = 0.001), P3a latency (p = 0.044), and P3a amplitude at electrode Cz (CzP3aA; p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with patient prognosis. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that FzMMNA, CzP3aA, EEG-R, and Motor-R were significant independent predictors of a favorable outcome. The sensitivity and specificity of FzMMNA (dichotomized at 1.16 μV) were 86.4% and 58.5%, and of CzP3aA (cut-off value 2.76 μV) were 90.9% and 70.7%, respectively. ERP amplitude (ERP-A), a combination of FzMMNA and CzP3aA, improved prediction accuracy, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.884. A model incorporating Motor-R, EEG-R, and ERP-A yielded an outstanding predictive performance (AUC=0.921) for a favorable outcome.

CONCLUSION

ERP-A and the prognostic model resulted in the efficient prediction of a favorable outcome in unresponsive patients.

Common patterns of EEG reactivity in post-anoxic coma identified by quantitative analyses

OBJECTIVE

Description of typical kinds of EEG reactivity (EEG-R) in post-anoxic coma using a quantitative method.

METHODS

Study of 101 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients, 71 with good outcome (cerebral performance category scale ≤ 2). EEG was recorded 12-24 hours after cardiac arrest and four noxious, one auditory, and one visual stimulation were applied for 30 seconds each. Individual reference intervals for the power in the delta, theta, alpha, and beta bands were calculated based on six 2-second resting epochs just prior to stimulations. EEG-R in consecutive 2-second epochs after stimulation was expressed in Z-scores.

RESULTS

EEG-R occurred roughly equally frequent as an increase or as a decrease in EEG activity. Sternal rub and sound stimulation were most provocative with the most pronounced changes as an increase in delta activity 4.5-8.5 seconds after stimulation and a decrease in theta activity 0.5-4.5 seconds after stimulation. These parameters predicted good outcome with an AUC of 0.852 (95 % CI: 0.771-0.932).

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative EEG-R is a feasible method for identification of common types of reactivity, for evaluation of stimulation methods, and for prognostication.

SIGNIFICANCE

This method provides an objective measure of EEG-R revealing knowledge about the nature of EEG-R and its use as a diagnostic tool.

Quantitative Assessment of Electroencephalogram Reactivity in Comatose Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Objective assessment of the brain's responsiveness in comatose patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) support is essential to clinical care, but current approaches are limited by subjective methodology and inter-rater disagreement. Quantitative electroencephalogram (EEG) algorithms could potentially assist clinicians, improving diagnostic accuracy. We developed a quantitative, stimulus-based algorithm to assess EEG reactivity features in comatose patients on ECMO support. Patients underwent a stimulation protocol of increasing intensity (auditory, peripheral, and nostril stimulation). A total of 129 20-s EEG epochs were collected from 24 patients (age [Formula: see text], 10 females, 14 males) on ECMO support with a Glasgow Coma Scale[Formula: see text]8. EEG reactivity scores ([Formula: see text]-scores) were calculated using aggregated spectral power and permutation entropy for each of five frequency bands ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]. Parameter estimation techniques were applied to [Formula: see text]-scores to identify properties that replicate the decision process of experienced clinicians performing visual analysis. Spectral power changes from audio stimulation were concentrated in the [Formula: see text] band, whereas peripheral stimulation elicited an increase in spectral power across multiple bands, and nostril stimulation changed the entropy of the [Formula: see text] band. The findings of this pilot study on [Formula: see text]-score lay a foundation for a future prediction tool with clinical applications.

EEG Essentials

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

EEG is the best study for evaluating the electrophysiologic function of the brain. The relevance of EEG is based on an accurate interpretation of the recording. Understanding the neuroscientific basis for EEG is essential. The basis for recording and interpreting EEG is both brain site-specific and technique-dependent to detect and represent a complex series of waveforms. Separating normal from abnormal EEG lies at the foundation of essential interpretative skills.

RECENT FINDINGS

Seizures and epilepsy are the primary targets for clinical use of EEG in diagnosis, seizure classification, and management. Interictal epileptiform discharges on EEG support a clinical diagnosis of seizures, but only when an electrographic seizure is recorded is the diagnosis confirmed. New variations of normal waveforms, benign variants, and artifacts can mimic epileptiform patterns and are potential pitfalls for misinterpretation for inexperienced interpreters. A plethora of medical conditions involve nonepileptiform and epileptiform abnormalities on EEG along the continuum of people who appear healthy to those who are critically ill. Emerging trends in long-term EEG monitoring to diagnose, classify, quantify, and characterize patients with seizures have unveiled epilepsy syndromes in patients and expanded medical and surgical options for treatment. Advances in terminology and application of continuous EEG help unify neurologists in the diagnosis of nonconvulsive seizures and status epilepticus in patients with encephalopathy and prognosticate recovery from serious neurologic injury involving the brain.

SUMMARY

After 100 years, EEG has retained a key role in the neurologist's toolkit as a safe, widely available, versatile, portable test of neurophysiology, and it is likely to remain at the forefront for patients with neurologic diseases. Interpreting EEG is based on qualitative review, and therefore, the accuracy of reporting is based on the interpreter's training, experience, and exposure to many new and older waveforms.

A method to assess the default EEG macrostate and its reactivity to stimulation

OBJECTIVE

The default mode network (DMN) is deactivated by stimulation. We aimed to assess the DMN reactivity impairment by routine EEG recordings in stroke patients with impaired consciousness.

METHODS

Binocular light flashes were delivered at 1 Hz in 1-minute epochs, following a 1-minute baseline (PRE). The EEG was decomposed in a series of binary oscillatory macrostates by topographic spectral clustering. The most deactivated macrostate was labeled the default EEG macrostate (DEM). Its reactivity (DER) was quantified as the decrease in DEM occurrence probability during stimulation. A normalized DER index (DERI) was calculated as DER/PRE. The measures were compared between 14 healthy controls and 32 comatose patients under EEG monitoring following an acute stroke.

RESULTS

The DEM was mapped to the posterior DMN hubs. In the patients, these DEM source dipoles were 3-4 times less frequent and were associated with an increased theta activity. Even in a reduced 6-channel montage, a DER below 6.26% corresponding to a DERI below 0.25 could discriminate the patients with sensitivity and specificity well above 80%.

CONCLUSION

The method detected the DMN impairment in post-stroke coma patients.

SIGNIFICANCE

The DEM and its reactivity to stimulation could be useful to monitor the DMN function at bedside.

Background frequency can enhance the prognostication power of EEG patterns categories in comatose cardiac arrest survivors: a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study

Background

We assessed the prognostic accuracy of the standardized electroencephalography (EEG) patterns (“highly malignant,” “malignant,” and “benign”) according to the EEG timing (early vs. late) and investigated the EEG features to enhance the predictive power for poor neurologic outcome at 1 month after cardiac arrest.

Methods

This prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study using data from Korean Hypothermia Network prospective registry included adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) treated with targeted temperature management (TTM) and underwent standard EEG within 7 days after cardiac arrest from 14 university-affiliated teaching hospitals in South Korea between October 2015 and December 2018. Early EEG was defined as EEG performed within 72 h after cardiac arrest. The primary outcome was poor neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category score 3–5) at 1 month.

Results

Among 489 comatose OHCA survivors with a median EEG time of 46.6 h, the “highly malignant” pattern (40.7%) was most prevalent, followed by the “benign” (33.9%) and “malignant” (25.4%) patterns. All patients with the highly malignant EEG pattern had poor neurologic outcomes, with 100% specificity in both groups but 59.3% and 56.1% sensitivity in the early and late EEG groups, respectively. However, for patients with “malignant” patterns, 84.8% sensitivity, 77.0% specificity, and 89.5% positive predictive value for poor neurologic outcome were observed. Only 3.5% (9/256) of patients with background EEG frequency of predominant delta waves or undetermined had good neurologic survival. The combination of “highly malignant” or “malignant” EEG pattern with background frequency of delta waves or undetermined increased specificity and positive predictive value, respectively, to up to 98.0% and 98.7%.

Conclusions

The “highly malignant” patterns predicted poor neurologic outcome with a high specificity regardless of EEG measurement time. The assessment of predominant background frequency in addition to EEG patterns can increase the prognostic value of OHCA survivors.

Trial registration KORHN-PRO, NCT02827422. Registered 11 September 2016—Retrospectively registered.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-021-03823-y.

Association of Standard Electroencephalography Findings With Mortality and Command Following in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Remaining Unresponsive After Sedation Interruption

CONTEXT

Delayed awakening after sedation interruption is frequent in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate the association of standard electroencephalography with mortality and command following in this setting.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS

In a single-center study, we retrospectively analyzed standard electroencephalography performed in consecutive mechanically ventilated patients remaining unresponsive (comatose/stuporous or unable to follow commands) after sedation interruption. Standard electroencephalography parameters (background activity, continuity, and reactivity) were reassessed by neurophysiologists, blinded to patients' outcome. Patients were categorized during follow-up into three groups based on their best examination as: 1) command following, 2) unresponsive, or 3) deceased. Cause-specific models were used to identify independent standard electroencephalography parameters associated with main outcomes, that is, mortality and command following. Follow-up was right-censored 30 days after standard electroencephalography.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Main standard electroencephalography parameters recorded in 121 unresponsive patients (median time between sedation interruption and standard electroencephalography: 2 d [interquartile range, 1-4 d]) consisted of a background frequency greater than 4 Hz in 71 (59%), a discontinuous background in 19 (16%), and a preserved reactivity in 98/120 (82%) patients. At 30 days, 66 patients (55%) were command following, nine (7%) were unresponsive, and 46 (38%) had died. In a multivariate analysis adjusted for nonneurologic organ failure, a reactive standard electroencephalography with a background frequency greater than 4 Hz was independently associated with a reduced risk of death (cause-specific hazard ratio, 0.38; CI 95%, 0.16-0.9). By contrast, none of the standard electroencephalography parameters were independently associated with command following. Sensitivity analyses conducted after exclusion of 29 patients with hypoxic brain injury revealed similar findings.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients remaining unresponsive after sedation interruption, a pattern consisting of a reactive standard electroencephalography with a background frequency greater than 4 Hz was associated with decreased odds of death. None of the standard electroencephalography parameters were independently associated with command following.

Delayed awakening in neurocritical care

Delayed awakening is defined as a persistent disorder of arousal or consciousness 48 to 72h after sedation interruption in critically ill patients. Delayed awakening is either a component of coma or delirium. It results in longer hospital stays and increased mortality. It is therefore a diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic emergency. In severe brain injured patients, delayed awakening may be related to the primary neurological injury or to secondary systemic insults related to organ failure associated with intensive care. In the present review, we propose diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic algorithms for managing delayed awaking in neuro-ICU brain injured patients.

[Long-term EEG monitoring in patients with acute traumatic brain injury]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the informativeness of long-term scalp EEG monitoring in patients with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The informativity of long-term EEG monitoring (LTM) was performed in 60 patients with acute severe TBI. Odd ratios (OR) of unfavorable outcome and non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) among clinical, neurophysiological and radiological features were calculated.

RESULTS

EEG features of the unfavorable outcome are: slowing of the dominant background rhythm below q range (OR 3.5, CI 1.2-10.7), absence of frontal-occipital gradient (OR 10.2, CI 1.89-10.12), absence of reactivity (OR 8.75, CI 2.14-35.7), absence of variability (OR 6.25, CI 1.72-22.6) and absence of NREM sleep, stage 2 (OR 5.8, CI 1.79-18.91). Clinical features associated with the unfavorable outcome are: a decrease in GCS score (OR 1.25, CI 1.07-1.47), TBI severity (OR 2.46, CI 1.16-5.18), axial dislocation (OR 4.45, CI 1.08-18.29). ORs for NCSE are significant for the following EEG features: presence of rhythmic and periodic patterns (RPP) (OR 11.92, CI 1.37-103.39), stimulus induced RPP (OR 23.14, CI 2.56-209.34), "plus" modifier (OR 4.11, CI 1.13-14.91) and electrographic evolution (OR 13.05, CI 3.59-47.39). Background rhythm slowing below q range reduces NCSE probability (OR 3.33, CI 1.09-10).

CONCLUSION

Long-term EEG monitoring is an informative tool for prognosis of outcome and diagnosis of NCSE in patients with severe TBI. The risk of NCSE increases with Marshall score but NCSE is not associated with poor outcome that requires an individual selection of intensive care.

Assessment of a standardized EEG reactivity protocol after cardiac arrest

OBJECTIVE

Reactivity assessment during EEG might provide important prognostic information in post-anoxic coma. It is still unclear how best to perform reactivity testing and how it might be affected by hypothermia. Our primary aim was to determine and compare the effectiveness, inter-rater reliability and prognostic value of different types of stimulus for EEG reactivity testing, using a standardized stimulation protocol and standardized definitions. Our secondary aims were to assess the effect of hypothermia on these measures, and to determine the prognostic value of a simplified sequence with the three most efficient stimuli.

METHODS

Prospective single-center cohort of post-anoxic comatose patients admitted to the intensive care unit of an academic medical center between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2018 and receiving continuous EEG monitoring (CEEG). Reactivity was assessed using standardized definitions and standardized sequence of stimuli: auditory (mild noise and loud noise), tactile (shaking), nociceptive (nostril tickling, trapezius muscle squeezing, endotracheal tube suctioning), and visual (passive eye opening). Gwet's AC1 and percent agreement (PA) were used to measure inter-rater agreement (IRA). Ability to predict favorable neurological outcome (defined as a Cerebral Performance Category of 1 to 2: no disability to moderate disability) was measured with sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), accuracy, and odds ratio [OR]. These were calculated for each stimulus type and at the level of the entire sequence comprising all the stimuli.

RESULTS

One-hundred and fifteen patients were included and 242 EEG epochs were analyzed. Loud noise, shaking and trapezius muscle squeezing most frequently elicited EEG reactivity (42%, 38% and 38%, respectively) but were all inferior to the entire sequence, which elicited reactivity in 58% cases. The IRA for reactivity to individual stimuli varied from moderate to good (AC1:58-69%; PA:56-68%) and was the highest for loud noise (AC1:69%; PA:68%), trapezius muscle squeezing (AC1:67%; PA:65%) and passive eye opening (AC1:68%; PA:64%). Mild (odds ratio [OR]:11.0; Se:70% and Sp:86%) and loud noises (OR:27.0; Se:73% and Sp:75%), and trapezius muscle squeezing (OR:15.3; Se:76% and Sp:83%) during hypothermia had the best predictive value for favorable neurological outcome, although each was inferior to the whole sequence (OR:60.2; Se:91% and Sp:73%). A simplified sequence of loud noise, shaking and trapezius muscle squeezing had the same performance for predicting neurological outcome as the entire sequence. Hypothermia did not significantly affect the effectiveness of stimulation, but IRA was slightly better during hypothermia, for all stimuli. Similarly, the predictive value was higher during hypothermia than during normothermia.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a standardized stimulation protocol and standardized definitions, the IRA of EEG reactivity testing in post-anoxic comatose patients was only good at best (AC1 < 70%), and its predictive value for neurological outcome remained imperfect, in particular with Sp values < 90%. While no single stimulus appeared superior to others, a full sequence using all stimuli or a simplified sequence comprising loud noise, shaking and trapezius muscle squeezing had the best combination of IRA and predictive value.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study stresses the necessity to use multiple stimulus types to improve the predictive value of reactivity testing in post-anoxic coma and confirms that it is not affected by hypothermia.

European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines 2021: post-resuscitation care

The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) have collaborated to produce these post-resuscitation care guidelines for adults, which are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations. The topics covered include the post-cardiac arrest syndrome, diagnosis of cause of cardiac arrest, control of oxygenation and ventilation, coronary reperfusion, haemodynamic monitoring and management, control of seizures, temperature control, general intensive care management, prognostication, long-term outcome, rehabilitation and organ donation.

European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Guidelines 2021: Post-resuscitation care

The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) have collaborated to produce these post-resuscitation care guidelines for adults, which are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations. The topics covered include the post-cardiac arrest syndrome, diagnosis of cause of cardiac arrest, control of oxygenation and ventilation, coronary reperfusion, haemodynamic monitoring and management, control of seizures, temperature control, general intensive care management, prognostication, long-term outcome, rehabilitation, and organ donation.

Are neurophysiologic tests reliable, ultra-early prognostic indices after cardiac arrest?

OBJECTIVES

Determining early and reliable prognosis in comatose subjects after cardiac arrest is a central component of post-cardiac arrest care both for developing realistic prognostic expectations for families, and for better determining which resources are mobilized or withheld for individual patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic accuracy of EEG and SEP patterns during the very early period (within the first 6 h) after cardiac arrest.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed comatose patients after CA, either inside or outside the hospital, in which prognostic evaluation was made during the first 6 h from CA. Prognostic evaluation comprised clinical evaluation (GCS and pupillary light reflex) and neurophysiological (electroencephalography (EEG) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP)) studies. Prognosis was evaluated with regards to likelihood of recovery of consciousness and also likelihood of failure to regain consciousness.

RESULTS

Forty-one comatose patients after cardiac arrest were included. All patients with continuous and nearly continuous EEG recovered consciousness. Isoelectric EEG was always associated with poor outcome. Burst-suppression, suppression and discontinuous patterns were usually associated with poor outcome although some consciousness recovery was observed. Bilaterally absent SEP responses were always associated with poor outcome. Continuous and nearly continuous EEG patterns were never associated with bilaterally absent SEP.

CONCLUSIONS

During the very early period following cardiac arrest (first 6 h), EEG and SEP maintain their high predictive value to predict respectively recovery and failure of recovery of consciousness. A very early EEG exam allows identification of patients with very high probability of a good outcome, allowing rapid use of the most appropriate therapeutic procedures.

Standardized visual EEG features predict outcome in patients with acute consciousness impairment of various etiologies

BACKGROUND

Early prognostication in patients with acute consciousness impairment is a challenging but essential task. Current prognostic guidelines vary with the underlying etiology. In particular, electroencephalography (EEG) is the most important paraclinical examination tool in patients with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), whereas it is not routinely used for outcome prediction in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

METHOD

Data from 364 critically ill patients with acute consciousness impairment (GCS ≤ 11 or FOUR ≤ 12) of various etiologies and without recent signs of seizures from a prospective randomized trial were retrospectively analyzed. Random forest classifiers were trained using 8 visual EEG features-first alone, then in combination with clinical features-to predict survival at 6 months or favorable functional outcome (defined as cerebral performance category 1-2).

RESULTS

The area under the ROC curve was 0.812 for predicting survival and 0.790 for predicting favorable outcome using EEG features. Adding clinical features did not improve the overall performance of the classifier (for survival: AUC = 0.806, p = 0.926; for favorable outcome: AUC = 0.777, p = 0.844). Survival could be predicted in all etiology groups: the AUC was 0.958 for patients with HIE, 0.955 for patients with TBI and other neurosurgical diagnoses, 0.697 for patients with metabolic, inflammatory or infectious causes for consciousness impairment and 0.695 for patients with stroke. Training the classifier separately on subgroups of patients with a given etiology (and thus using less training data) leads to poorer classification performance.

CONCLUSIONS

While prognostication was best for patients with HIE and TBI, our study demonstrates that similar EEG criteria can be used in patients with various causes of consciousness impairment, and that the size of the training set is more important than homogeneity of ACI etiology.

EEG reactivity testing for prediction of good outcome in patients after cardiac arrest

Objective

To determine the additional value of EEG reactivity (EEG-R) testing to EEG background pattern for prediction of good outcome in adult patients after cardiac arrest (CA).

Methods

In this post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study, EEG-R was tested twice a day, using a strict protocol. Good outcome was defined as a Cerebral Performance Category score of 1–2 within 6 months. The additional value of EEG-R per EEG background pattern was evaluated using the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Prognostic value (sensitivity and specificity) of EEG-R was investigated in relation to time after CA, sedative medication, different stimuli, and repeated testing.

Results

Between 12 and 24 hours after CA, data of 108 patients were available. Patients with a continuous (n = 64) or discontinuous (n = 19) normal voltage background pattern with reactivity were 3 and 8 times more likely to have a good outcome than without reactivity (continuous: DOR, 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97–12.0; p = 0.06; discontinuous: DOR, 8.0; 95% CI, 1.0–63.97; p = 0.0499). EEG-R was not observed in other background patterns within 24 hours after CA. In 119 patients with a normal voltage EEG background pattern, continuous or discontinuous, any time after CA, prognostic value was highest in sedated patients (sensitivity 81.3%, specificity 59.5%), irrespective of time after CA. EEG-R induced by handclapping and sternal rubbing, especially when combined, had highest prognostic value. Repeated EEG-R testing increased prognostic value.

Conclusion

EEG-R has additional value for prediction of good outcome in patients with discontinuous normal voltage EEG background pattern and possibly with continuous normal voltage. The best stimuli were clapping and sternal rubbing.

EEG signal varies with different outcomes in comatose patients: A quantitative method of electroencephalography reactivity

BACKGROUND

Electroencephalographic reactivity (EEG-R) is a major predictor of outcome in comatose patients; however, the inter-rater reliability is limited due to the lack of homogeneous stimuli and quantitative interpretation.

NEW METHODS

EEG-R testing was employed in comatose patients by quantifiable electrical stimulation. Reactivity at different frequency bands was computed as the difference between pre- and post-stimulations in power spectra and connectivity function (including magnitude squared coherence and transfer entropy). The clinical outcomes were dichotomized as good and poor according to the recovery of consciousness. Signal discrimination of EEG-R was compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 18 patients (43%) regained consciousness at a 3-month follow-up. In the patients who regained consciousness, the EEG power increased significantly (P < 0.05) at the Alpha and Beta frequency bands after stimulation as compared to those with no behavioral awakening. Also, connectivity enhancement (including linear and nonlinear analysis) in the Beta and Gamma bands and connectivity decrease (nonlinear transfer entropy analysis) in the Delta band after stimulus were observed in the good outcome group.

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S)

In this study, the combined use of quantifiable stimulation and quantitative analysis shed new light on differentiating brain responses in comatose patients with good and poor outcomes as well as exploring the nature of EEG changes concerning the recovery of consciousness.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of quantifiable electrical stimulation and quantitative analysis with spectral power and connectivity for the EEG-R may be a promising method to predict the outcome of comatose patients.

Electroencephalographic Reporting for Refractory Status Epilepticus

PURPOSE

We aimed to determine whether clinical EEG reports obtained from children in the intensive care unit with refractory status epilepticus could provide data for comparative effectiveness research studies.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective descriptive study to assess the documentation of key variables within clinical continuous EEG monitoring reports based on the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's standardized EEG terminology for children with refractory status epilepticus from 10 academic centers. Two pediatric electroencephalographers reviewed the EEG reports. We compared reports generated using free text or templates.

RESULTS

We reviewed 191 EEG reports. Agreement between the electroencephalographers regarding whether a variable was described in the report ranged from fair to very good. The presence of electrographic seizures (ES) was documented in 46% (87/191) of reports, and these reports documented the time of first ES in 64% (56/87), ES duration in 72% (63/85), and ES frequency in 68% (59/87). Reactivity was documented in 16% (31/191) of reports, and it was more often documented in template than in free-text reports (40% vs. 14%, P = 0.006). Other variables were not differentially reported in template versus free-text reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Many key EEG features are not documented consistently in clinical continuous EEG monitoring reports, including ES characteristics and reactivity assessment. Standardization may be needed for clinical EEG reports to provide informative data for large multicenter observational studies.

Early electroencephalography for outcome prediction of postanoxic coma: A prospective cohort study

Objective

To provide evidence that early electroencephalography (EEG) allows for reliable prediction of poor or good outcome after cardiac arrest.

Methods

In a 5‐center prospective cohort study, we included consecutive, comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. Continuous EEG recordings were started as soon as possible and continued up to 5 days. Five‐minute EEG epochs were assessed by 2 reviewers, independently, at 8 predefined time points from 6 hours to 5 days after cardiac arrest, blinded for patients’ actual condition, treatment, and outcome. EEG patterns were categorized as generalized suppression (<10 μV), synchronous patterns with ≥50% suppression, continuous, or other. Outcome at 6 months was categorized as good (Cerebral Performance Category [CPC] = 1–2) or poor (CPC = 3–5).

Results

We included 850 patients, of whom 46% had a good outcome. Generalized suppression and synchronous patterns with ≥50% suppression predicted poor outcome without false positives at ≥6 hours after cardiac arrest. Their summed sensitivity was 0.47 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.42–0.51) at 12 hours and 0.30 (95% CI = 0.26–0.33) at 24 hours after cardiac arrest, with specificity of 1.00 (95% CI = 0.99–1.00) at both time points. At 36 hours or later, sensitivity for poor outcome was ≤0.22. Continuous EEG patterns at 12 hours predicted good outcome, with sensitivity of 0.50 (95% CI = 0.46–0.55) and specificity of 0.91 (95% CI = 0.88–0.93); at 24 hours or later, specificity for the prediction of good outcome was <0.90.

Interpretation

EEG allows for reliable prediction of poor outcome after cardiac arrest, with maximum sensitivity in the first 24 hours. Continuous EEG patterns at 12 hours after cardiac arrest are associated with good recovery. ANN NEUROL 2019;86:203–214

Electroencephalographic reactivity as predictor of neurological outcome in postanoxic coma: A multicenter prospective cohort study

Objective

Outcome prediction in patients after cardiac arrest (CA) is challenging. Electroencephalographic reactivity (EEG‐R) might be a reliable predictor. We aimed to determine the prognostic value of EEG‐R using a standardized assessment.

Methods

In a prospective cohort study, a strictly defined EEG‐R assessment protocol was executed twice per day in adult patients after CA. EEG‐R was classified as present or absent by 3 EEG readers, blinded to patient characteristics. Uncertain reactivity was classified as present. Primary outcome was best Cerebral Performance Category score (CPC) in 6 months after CA, dichotomized as good (CPC = 1–2) or poor (CPC = 3–5). EEG‐R was considered reliable for predicting poor outcome if specificity was ≥95%. For good outcome prediction, a specificity of ≥80% was used. Added value of EEG‐R was the increase in specificity when combined with EEG background, neurological examination, and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs).

Results

Of 160 patients enrolled, 149 were available for analyses. Absence of EEG‐R for poor outcome prediction had a specificity of 82% and a sensitivity of 73%. For good outcome prediction, specificity was 73% and sensitivity 82%. Specificity for poor outcome prediction increased from 98% to 99% when EEG‐R was added to a multimodal model. For good outcome prediction, specificity increased from 70% to 89%.

Interpretation

EEG‐R testing in itself is not sufficiently reliable for outcome prediction in patients after CA. For poor outcome prediction, it has no substantial added value to EEG background, neurological examination, and SSEPs. For prediction of good outcome, EEG‐R seems to have added value. ANN NEUROL 2019

Preliminary experience with point-of-care EEG in post-cardiac arrest patients

OBJECTIVE

Abnormal electroencephalography (EEG) patterns are common after resuscitation from cardiac arrest and have clinical and prognostic importance. Bedside continuous EEGs are not available in many institutions. We tested the feasibility of using a point-of-care system for EEG acquisition.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled a convenience sample of post-cardiac arrest patients between 9/2015-1/2017. Upon hospital arrival, a limited EEG montage was applied. We tested both continuous EEG (cEEG) and this point-of-care EEG (eEEG). A board-certified epileptologist and a board-certified neurointensivist jointly reviewed all EEGs. Cohen's kappa coefficient evaluated agreement between eEEG and cEEG and Fisher's exact test evaluated their associations with survival to hospital discharge and proximate cause of death.

RESULTS

We studied 95 comatose post-cardiac arrest patients. Mean age was 59 (SD17) years. Most (61%) were male, few (N = 22; 23%) demonstrated shockable rhythms, and PCAC IV illness severity was present in 58 (61%). eEEG was interpretable in 57 (60%) subjects. The most common eEEG interpretations were: continuous (21%), generalized suppression (14%), burst-suppression (12%) and burst-suppression with identical bursts (10%). Seizures were detected in 2 eEEG subjects (2%). No patient with seizure or burst-suppression with identical bursts survived. cEEG demonstrated generalized suppression (31%), burst-suppression with identical bursts (27%), continuous (18%) and seizure (4%). The eEEG and cEEG demonstrated fair agreement (kappa = 0.27). Neither eEEG nor cEEG was associated with survival (p = 0.19; p = 0.11) or proximate cause of death (p = 0.14; p = 0.8) CONCLUSIONS: eEEG is feasible, although artifact often precludes interpretation. eEEG is fairly associated with cEEG and may facilitate post-cardiac arrest care.

EEG Reactivity Evaluation Practices for Adult and Pediatric Hypoxic-Ischemic Coma Prognostication in North America

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the variability in EEG reactivity evaluation practices during cardiac arrest prognostication.

METHODS

A survey of institutional representatives from North American academic hospitals participating in the Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortium was conducted to assess practice patterns involving EEG reactivity evaluation. This 10-question multiple-choice survey evaluated metrics related to technical, interpretation, personnel, and procedural aspects of bedside EEG reactivity testing and interpretation specific to cardiac arrest prognostication. One response per hospital was obtained.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 25 hospitals, including 7 pediatric hospitals. A standardized EEG reactivity protocol was available in 44% of centers. Sixty percent of respondents believed that reactivity interpretation was subjective. Reactivity bedside testing always (100%) started during hypothermia and was performed daily during monitoring in the majority (71%) of hospitals. Stimulation was performed primarily by neurodiagnostic technologists (76%). The mean number of activation procedures modalities tested was 4.5 (SD 2.1). The most commonly used activation procedures were auditory (83.3%), nail bed pressure (63%), and light tactile stimuli (63%). Changes in EEG amplitude alone were not considered consistent with EEG reactivity in 21% of centers.

CONCLUSIONS

There is substantial variability in EEG reactivity evaluation practices during cardiac arrest prognostication among North American academic hospitals. Efforts are needed to standardize protocols and nomenclature according with national guidelines and promote best practices in EEG reactivity evaluation.

Value and mechanisms of EEG reactivity in the prognosis of patients with impaired consciousness: a systematic review

Background

Electroencephalography (EEG) is a well-established tool for assessing brain function that is available at the bedside in the intensive care unit (ICU). This review aims to discuss the relevance of electroencephalographic reactivity (EEG-R) in patients with impaired consciousness and to describe the neurophysiological mechanisms involved.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search of the term “EEG reactivity and coma” using the PubMed database. The search encompassed articles published from inception to March 2018 and produced 202 articles, of which 42 were deemed relevant, assessing the importance of EEG-R in relationship to outcomes in patients with impaired consciousness, and were therefore included in this review.

Results

Although definitions, characteristics and methods used to assess EEG-R are heterogeneous, several studies underline that a lack of EEG-R is associated with mortality and unfavorable outcome in patients with impaired consciousness. However, preserved EEG-R is linked to better odds of survival. Exploring EEG-R to nociceptive, auditory, and visual stimuli enables a noninvasive trimodal functional assessment of peripheral and central sensory ascending pathways that project to the brainstem, the thalamus and the cerebral cortex. A lack of EEG-R in patients with impaired consciousness may result from altered modulation of thalamocortical loop activity by afferent sensory input due to neural impairment. Assessing EEG-R is a valuable tool for the diagnosis and outcome prediction of severe brain dysfunction in critically ill patients.

Conclusions

This review emphasizes that whatever the etiology, patients with impaired consciousness featuring a reactive electroencephalogram are more likely to have a favorable outcome, whereas those with a nonreactive electroencephalogram are prone to having an unfavorable outcome. EEG-R is therefore a valuable prognostic parameter and warrants a rigorous assessment. However, current assessment methods are heterogeneous, and no consensus exists. Standardization of stimulation and interpretation methods is needed.