The modified DYMUS questionnaire is a reliable, valid and easy‐to‐use tool in the assessment of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis

Prevalence of dysphagia in patients with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dysphagia is a major disorder observed in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), yet different prevalence rates are reported for it. Therefore, we designed this study to estimate the pooled prevalence of dysphagia in patients with MS.

METHOD

We searched PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and gray literature including references from the identified studies, reviews studies, and conference abstracts which were published up to May 2022. Articles that were relevant to our topic and could provide information regarding the prevalence of dysphagia among MS patients were included; however, articles with self-report screening strategies were excluded.

RESULTS

The literature search found 997 articles. After eliminating duplicates, 672 articles remained. Two conference abstracts were included for final analysis. A total of 11,266 MS cases and 5047 MS patients with dysphagia were included in the meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of dysphagia across all 54 studies was 44.8 % (95 % CI: [40.4 %-49.2 %]), with a high level of heterogeneity between countries (Q=; I² = 94.96 %; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results of this systematic review shows that the prevalence of dysphagia in MS patients is 45% which is greatly higher compared to the general population.

History and Science behind the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (Eat-10): Lessons Learned

INTRODUCTION

Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) is an underdiagnosed medical condition with a high prevalence in populations such as patients with frailty, neurological disease, or head and neck pathology. Potential barriers to its diagnosis include lack of (or low) awareness of the existence and severity of the condition, the hidden nature of the condition within the 'normal ageing' process, clinical limitations, and socioeconomic reasons. Consequently, an effective treatment is not systematically offered in a timely manner, and complications, such as dehydration and respiratory infections or aspiration pneumonia, can arise. To overcome this issue, the early use of screening questionnaires to identify people at risk of swallowing disorders represents the cornerstone of preventive medicine. Several screening tools have been created but few are widely used in clinical practice. The Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) was developed as a quick, easy-to-understand, and self-administered screening tool for OD.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted in five databases with no restrictions on the language, date of publication, or design of the study to identify aspects of the validation, applicability, and usefulness of EAT-10.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Transcultural adaptation and translation studies, as well as studies involving various types of patients with dysphagia in different settings have shown the validity and reliability of EAT-10 in relation to the gold standard and other validation tools. The use of this standardised screening tool could be used as a primary screening instrument of dysphagia in routine clinical practice across a wide range of diseases and settings and thereby increase the likelihood of early diagnosis and management of a condition that lead to serious complications and impaired quality of life.

Validation of the Czech Version of the Dysphagia in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire (DYMUS)

Dysphagia is a common symptom of neurological disease, including multiple sclerosis (MS). The DYsphagia in MUltiple Sclerosis (DYMUS) questionnaire was developed as a screening tool for swallowing problems. The purpose of the present study was to validate the Czech version of the DYMUS questionnaire. We validated the questionnaire on a sample of 435 patients with MS and 135 healthy controls (HC) chosen by accidental sampling from larger, long-term studies conducted by the Prague MS Center. For the purposes of this study, we used both electronic (primary method of distribution) and paper-based (backup) versions of the questionnaire. The internal consistency of the whole scale was satisfactory (Cronbach’s α =0.833). The DYMUS mean score in HC was 0.215 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.776). Normative data suggested a cut-off value for dysphagia between 1 and 2 points. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed a two-factor structure of the adapted scale. However, the structure did not completely correspond to the originally proposed dimensions of dysphagia for solids and liquids; our data supported dropout of item Q10. Criterion validity was proved by the difference in dysphagia between HC and patients MS (U = 25,546, p < 0.001) and by a positive correlation with the EDSS (Kendall’s tau-b = 0.169, p < 0.001) and other patient-reported outcomes. The Czech version of the DYMUS questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating swallowing impairment in Czech-speaking patients with MS. Moreover, the questionnaire can be administered electronically, with a paper-based backup.