1
|
Zhang N, Wang G, Yang L, Zhang J, Yuan Y, Ma L, Wang Z. Intravenous immunoglobulin alleviates Japanese encephalitis virus-induced peripheral neuropathy by inhibiting the ASM/ceramide pathway. Int Immunopharmacol 2024; 133:112083. [PMID: 38648714 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) infection is considered a global public health emergency. Severe peripheral neuropathy caused by JEV infection has increased disability and mortality rates in recent years. Because there are very few therapeutic options for JEV infection, prompt investigations of the ability of clinically safe, efficacious and globally available drugs to inhibit JEV infection and ameliorate peripheral neuropathy are urgently needed. In this study, we found that high doses of intravenous immunoglobulin, a function inhibitor of acid sphingomyelinase (FIASMA), inhibited acid sphingomyelinase (ASM) and ceramide activity in the serum and sciatic nerve of JEV-infected rats, reduced disease severity, reversed electrophysiological and histological abnormalities, significantly reduced circulating proinflammatory cytokine levels, inhibited Th1 and Th17 cell proliferation, and suppressed the infiltration of inflammatory CD4 + cells into the sciatic nerve. It also maintained the peripheral nerve-blood barrier without causing severe clinical side effects. In terms of the potential mechanisms, ASM was found to participate in immune cell differentiation and to activate immune cells, thereby exerting proinflammatory effects. Therefore, immunoglobulin is a FIASMA that reduces abnormal immune responses and thus targets the ASM/ceramide system to treat peripheral neuropathy caused by JEV infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Zhang
- School of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China; Neurology Center, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
| | - Guowei Wang
- School of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
| | - Liping Yang
- School of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
| | - Jinyuan Zhang
- Neurology Center, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
| | - YanPing Yuan
- School of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China; Neurology Center, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
| | - Lijun Ma
- Department of Human Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, School of Basic Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
| | - Zhenhai Wang
- School of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China; Diagnosis and Treatment Engineering Technology Research Center of Nervous System Diseases of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bus SR, de Haan RJ, Vermeulen M, van Schaik IN, Eftimov F. Intravenous immunoglobulin for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 2:CD001797. [PMID: 38353301 PMCID: PMC10865446 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001797.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) causes progressive or relapsing weakness and numbness of the limbs, which lasts for at least two months. Uncontrolled studies have suggested that intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) could help to reduce symptoms. This is an update of a review first published in 2002 and last updated in 2013. OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin in people with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trials registers on 8 March 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that tested any dose of IVIg versus placebo, plasma exchange, or corticosteroids in people with definite or probable CIDP. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcome was significant improvement in disability within six weeks after the start of treatment, as determined and defined by the study authors. Our secondary outcomes were change in mean disability score within six weeks, change in muscle strength (Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score) within six weeks, change in mean disability score at 24 weeks or later, frequency of serious adverse events, and frequency of any adverse events. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for our main outcomes. MAIN RESULTS We included nine RCTs with 372 participants (235 male) from Europe, North America, South America, and Israel. There was low statistical heterogeneity between the trial results, and the overall risk of bias was low for all trials that contributed data to the analysis. Five trials (235 participants) compared IVIg with placebo, one trial (20 participants) compared IVIg with plasma exchange, two trials (72 participants) compared IVIg with prednisolone, and one trial (45 participants) compared IVIg with intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP). We included one new trial in this update, though it contributed no data to any meta-analyses. IVIg compared with placebo increases the probability of significant improvement in disability within six weeks of the start of treatment (risk ratio (RR) 2.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.72 to 3.36; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 4, 95% CI 3 to 5; 5 trials, 269 participants; high-certainty evidence). Since each trial used a different disability scale and definition of significant improvement, we were unable to evaluate the clinical relevance of the pooled effect. IVIg compared with placebo improves disability measured on the Rankin scale (0 to 6, lower is better) two to six weeks after the start of treatment (mean difference (MD) -0.26 points, 95% CI -0.48 to -0.05; 3 trials, 90 participants; high-certainty evidence). IVIg compared with placebo probably improves disability measured on the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) scale (1 to 10, lower is better) after 24 weeks (MD 0.80 points, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.37; 1 trial, 117 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference between IVIg and placebo in the frequency of serious adverse events (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.87; 3 trials, 315 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The trial comparing IVIg with plasma exchange reported none of our main outcomes. IVIg compared with prednisolone probably has little or no effect on the probability of significant improvement in disability four weeks after the start of treatment (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.68; 1 trial, 29 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and little or no effect on change in mean disability measured on the Rankin scale (MD 0.21 points, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.61; 1 trial, 24 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference between IVIg and prednisolone in the frequency of serious adverse events (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.04 to 4.69; 1 cross-over trial, 32 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). IVIg compared with IVMP probably increases the likelihood of significant improvement in disability two weeks after starting treatment (RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.40 to 5.38; 1 trial, 45 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). IVIg compared with IVMP probably has little or no effect on change in disability measured on the Rankin scale two weeks after the start of treatment (MD 0.24 points, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.63; 1 trial, 45 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) or on change in mean disability measured with the Overall Neuropathy Limitation Scale (ONLS, 1 to 12, lower is better) 24 weeks after the start of treatment (MD 0.03 points, 95% CI -0.91 to 0.97; 1 trial, 45 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The frequency of serious adverse events may be higher with IVIg compared with IVMP (RR 4.40, 95% CI 0.22 to 86.78; 1 trial, 45 participants, moderate-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Evidence from RCTs shows that IVIg improves disability for at least two to six weeks compared with placebo, with an NNTB of 4. During this period, IVIg probably has similar efficacy to oral prednisolone and IVMP. Further placebo-controlled trials are unlikely to change these conclusions. In one large trial, the benefit of IVIg compared with placebo in terms of improved disability score persisted for 24 weeks. Further research is needed to assess the long-term benefits and harms of IVIg relative to other treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sander Rm Bus
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Rob J de Haan
- Clinical Research Unit, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marinus Vermeulen
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ivo N van Schaik
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Filip Eftimov
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Broers MC, Wieske L, Erdag E, Gürlek C, Bunschoten C, van Doorn PA, Eftimov F, Kuitwaard K, de Vries JM, de Wit MCY, Nagtzaam MM, Franken SC, Zhu L, Paunovic M, de Wit M, Schreurs MW, Lleixà C, Martín-Aguilar L, Pascual-Goñi E, Querol L, Jacobs BC, Huizinga R, Titulaer MJ. Clinical relevance of distinguishing autoimmune nodopathies from CIDP: longitudinal assessment in a large cohort. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2023; 95:52-60. [PMID: 37879898 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2023-331378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to determine treatment response and whether it is associated with antibody titre change in patients with autoimmune nodopathy (AN) previously diagnosed as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), and to compare clinical features and treatment response between AN and CIDP. METHODS Serum IgG antibodies to neurofascin-155 (NF155), contactin-1 (CNTN1) and contactin-associated protein 1 (CASPR1) were detected with cell-based assays in patients diagnosed with CIDP. Clinical improvement was determined using the modified Rankin scale, need for alternative and/or additional treatments and assessment of the treating neurologist. RESULTS We studied 401 patients diagnosed with CIDP and identified 21 patients with AN (10 anti-NF155, 6 anti-CNTN1, 4 anti-CASPR1 and 1 anti-NF155/anti-CASPR1 double positive). In patients with AN ataxia (68% vs 28%, p=0.001), cranial nerve involvement (34% vs 11%, p=0.012) and autonomic symptoms (47% vs 22%, p=0.025) were more frequently reported; patients with AN improved less often after intravenous immunoglobulin treatment (39% vs 80%, p=0.002) and required additional/alternative treatments more frequently (84% vs 34%, p<0.001), compared with patients with CIDP. Antibody titres decreased or became negative in patients improving on treatment. Treatment withdrawal was associated with a titre increase and clinical deterioration in four patients. CONCLUSIONS Distinguishing CIDP from AN is important, as patients with AN need a different treatment approach. Improvement and relapses were associated with changes in antibody titres, supporting the pathogenicity of these antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merel C Broers
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luuk Wieske
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ece Erdag
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Neuroscience, Aziz Sancar Institute of Experimental Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Cemre Gürlek
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carina Bunschoten
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter A van Doorn
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Filip Eftimov
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Krista Kuitwaard
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Juna M de Vries
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marie-Claire Y de Wit
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mariska Mp Nagtzaam
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne C Franken
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Louisa Zhu
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Manuela Paunovic
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maurice de Wit
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco Wj Schreurs
- Department of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cinta Lleixà
- Neuromuscular Diseases Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lorena Martín-Aguilar
- Neuromuscular Diseases Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elba Pascual-Goñi
- Neuromuscular Diseases Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Luis Querol
- Neuromuscular Diseases Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro para la de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Raras, CIBERER, Madrid, Spain
| | - Bart C Jacobs
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ruth Huizinga
- Department of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten J Titulaer
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cocito D, Peci E, Torrieri MC, Clerico M. Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: A Historical Perspective. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6961. [PMID: 38002576 PMCID: PMC10671960 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12226961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The therapeutic administration of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) offers various advantages over intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). This narrative review examines and compares SCIg versus IVIg in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). SCIg is as effective as IVIg but is better tolerated and easier to administer, as intravenous access is not required. Furthermore, SCIg administration is more convenient and cost-effective than IVIg, enabling flexible treatment scheduling at home and improving patients' overall quality of life. The availability of highly concentrated immunoglobulin G (IgG) subcutaneous solutions, such as IgPro20, a 20% IgG solution stabilized with L-proline, allows for the administration of larger volumes in a single session, while the parallel development of new technological devices enables the delivery of higher doses over a shorter time. Based on the results of the PATH study, SCIg has become a well-established therapy in CIDP. In addition to discussing the advantages of SCIg, this review summarizes the evolution of SCIg by discussing all the relevant clinical studies which have considered its use in the treatment of CIDP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario Cocito
- Clinical and Biological Sciences Department, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
| | - Erdita Peci
- Clinical and Biological Sciences Department, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy
| | | | - Marinella Clerico
- Academic Neurology Unit, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Clinical and Biological Sciences Department, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tavee J, Brannagan TH, Lenihan MW, Muppidi S, Kellermeyer L, D Donofrio P. Updated consensus statement: Intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of neuromuscular disorders report of the AANEM ad hoc committee. Muscle Nerve 2023; 68:356-374. [PMID: 37432872 DOI: 10.1002/mus.27922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
Intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) is an immune-modulating biologic therapy that is increasingly being used in neuromuscular disorders despite the paucity of high-quality evidence for various specific diseases. To address this, the AANEM created the 2009 consensus statement to provide guidance on the use of IVIG in neuromuscular disorders. Since then, there have been several randomized controlled trials for IVIG, a new FDA-approved indication for dermatomyositis and a revised classification system for myositis, prompting the AANEM to convene an ad hoc panel to update the existing guidelines.New recommendations based on an updated systemic review of the literature were categorized as Class I-IV. Based on Class I evidence, IVIG is recommended in the treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) in adults, multifocal motor neuropathy, dermatomyositis, stiff-person syndrome and myasthenia gravis exacerbations but not stable disease. Based on Class II evidence, IVIG is also recommended for Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome and pediatric GBS. In contrast, based on Class I evidence, IVIG is not recommended for inclusion body myositis, post-polio syndrome, IgM paraproteinemic neuropathy and small fiber neuropathy that is idiopathic or associated with tri-sulfated heparin disaccharide or fibroblast growth factor receptor-3 autoantibodies. Although only Class IV evidence exists for IVIG use in necrotizing autoimmune myopathy, it should be considered for anti-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase myositis given the risk of long-term disability. Insufficient evidence exists for the use of IVIG in Miller-Fisher syndrome, IgG and IgA paraproteinemic neuropathy, autonomic neuropathy, chronic autoimmune neuropathy, polymyositis, idiopathic brachial plexopathy and diabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexopathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinny Tavee
- National Jewish Health, Division of Neurology, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Thomas H Brannagan
- Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Neurological Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Sri Muppidi
- Stanford Neuroscience Health Center, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | | | - Peter D Donofrio
- Neurology Clinic, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Klehmet J, Tackenberg B, Haas J, Kieseier BC. Fatigue, depression, and product tolerability during long-term treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (Gamunex® 10%) in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. BMC Neurol 2023; 23:207. [PMID: 37237267 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03223-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/AIMS Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is characterized by progressive weakness and sensory loss, often affecting patient's ability to walk and perform activities of daily living independently. Furthermore, patients often report fatigue and depression which can affect their quality of life. These symptoms were assessed in CIDP patients receiving long-term intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatment. METHODS GAMEDIS was a multi-center, prospective, non-interventional study in adult CIDP patients treated with IVIG (10%) and followed for two years. Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) disability score, Hughes Disability Scale (HDS), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI), Short Form-36 health survey (SF-36) and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Score Attributable to General Health (WPAI-GH) were assessed at baseline and quarterly. Dosing and treatment intervals, changes in outcome parameters, and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. RESULTS 148 evaluable patients were followed for a mean of 83.3 weeks. The mean maintenance IVIG dose was 0.9 g/kg/cycle (mean cycle interval 38 days). Disability and fatigue remained stable throughout the study. Mean INCAT score: 2.4 ± 1.8 at baseline and 2.5 ± 1.9 at study end. HDS: 74.3% healthy/minor symptoms at baseline and 71.6% at study end. Mean FSS: 4.2 ± 1.6 at baseline and 4.1 ± 1.7 at study end. All patients reported minimal/no depression at baseline and throughout. SF-36 and WPAI-GH scores remained stable. Fifteen patients (9.5%) experienced potentially treatment-related AEs. There were no AEs in 99.3% of infusions. DISCUSSION Long-term treatment of CIDP patients with IVIG 10% in real-world conditions maintained clinical stability on fatigue and depression over 96 weeks. This treatment was well-tolerated and safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliane Klehmet
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Neurocure Clinical Research Center Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Jüdisches Krankenhaus Berlin, Heinz-Galinski-Straße 1, 13347, Berlin-Mitte, Germany
| | - Björn Tackenberg
- Klinik Und Poliklinik Für Neurologie, Baldingerstrasse 1, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| | - Judith Haas
- Jüdisches Krankenhaus Berlin, Heinz-Galinski-Straße 1, 13347, Berlin-Mitte, Germany
| | - Bernd C Kieseier
- Klinik Fur Neurologie, Heinrich-Heine Universität, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Briani C, Cocito D, Campagnolo M, Doneddu PE, Nobile-Orazio E. Update on therapy of chronic immune-mediated neuropathies. Neurol Sci 2022; 43:605-614. [PMID: 33452933 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-020-04998-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Chronic immune-mediated neuropathies, including chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), neuropathies associated with monoclonal gammopathy, and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), are a group of disorders deemed to be caused by an immune response against peripheral nerve antigens. Several immune therapies have been reported to be variably effective in these neuropathies including steroids, plasma exchange, and high-dose intravenous (IVIg) or subcutaneous (SCIg) immunoglobulins. These therapies are however far from being invariably effective and may be associated with a number of side effects leading to the use of immunosuppressive agents whose efficacy has not been so far confirmed in randomized trials. More recently, new biological agents, such as rituximab, have proved to be effective in patients with neuropathy associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy and are currently tested in CIDP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Briani
- Neurology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani, 5, 35128, Padova, Italy.
| | - Dario Cocito
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri, Torino, Italy
| | - Marta Campagnolo
- Neurology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani, 5, 35128, Padova, Italy
| | - Pietro Emiliano Doneddu
- Neuromuscular and Neuroimmunology Service, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Eduardo Nobile-Orazio
- Neuromuscular and Neuroimmunology Service, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Milan University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Querol L, Lleixà C. Novel Immunological and Therapeutic Insights in Guillain-Barré Syndrome and CIDP. Neurotherapeutics 2021; 18:2222-2235. [PMID: 34549385 PMCID: PMC8455117 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-021-01117-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory neuropathies are a heterogeneous group of rare diseases of the peripheral nervous system that include acute and chronic diseases, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). The etiology and pathophysiological mechanisms of inflammatory neuropathies are only partly known, but are considered autoimmune disorders in which an aberrant immune response, including cellular and humoral components, is directed towards components of the peripheral nerve causing demyelination and axonal damage. Therapy of these disorders includes broad-spectrum immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive treatments, such as intravenous immunoglobulin, corticosteroids, or plasma exchange. However, a significant proportion of patients do not respond to any of these therapies, and treatment selection is not optimized according to disease pathophysiology. Therefore, research on disease pathophysiology aiming to reveal clinically and functionally relevant disease mechanisms and the development of new treatment approaches are needed to optimize disease outcomes in CIDP and GBS. This topical review describes immunological progress that may help guide therapeutic strategies in the future in these two disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Querol
- Neuromuscular Diseases Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Mas Casanovas 90, 08041, Barcelona, Spain.
- Centro Para La Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain.
| | - Cinta Lleixà
- Neuromuscular Diseases Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Mas Casanovas 90, 08041, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dalakas MC. Update on Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Neurology: Modulating Neuro-autoimmunity, Evolving Factors on Efficacy and Dosing and Challenges on Stopping Chronic IVIg Therapy. Neurotherapeutics 2021; 18:2397-2418. [PMID: 34766257 PMCID: PMC8585501 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-021-01108-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
In the last 25 years, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has had a major impact in the successful treatment of previously untreatable or poorly controlled autoimmune neurological disorders. Derived from thousands of healthy donors, IVIg contains IgG1 isotypes of idiotypic antibodies that have the potential to bind pathogenic autoantibodies or cross-react with various antigenic peptides, including proteins conserved among the "common cold"-pre-pandemic coronaviruses; as a result, after IVIg infusions, some of the patients' sera may transiently become positive for various neuronal antibodies, even for anti-SARS-CoV-2, necessitating caution in separating antibodies derived from the infused IVIg or acquired humoral immunity. IVIg exerts multiple effects on the immunoregulatory network by variably affecting autoantibodies, complement activation, FcRn saturation, FcγRIIb receptors, cytokines, and inflammatory mediators. Based on randomized controlled trials, IVIg is approved for the treatment of GBS, CIDP, MMN and dermatomyositis; has been effective in, myasthenia gravis exacerbations, and stiff-person syndrome; and exhibits convincing efficacy in autoimmune epilepsy, neuromyelitis, and autoimmune encephalitis. Recent evidence suggests that polymorphisms in the genes encoding FcRn and FcγRIIB may influence the catabolism of infused IgG or its anti-inflammatory effects, impacting on individualized dosing or efficacy. For chronic maintenance therapy, IVIg and subcutaneous IgG are effective in controlled studies only in CIDP and MMN preventing relapses and axonal loss up to 48 weeks; in practice, however, IVIg is continuously used for years in all the aforementioned neurological conditions, like is a "forever necessary therapy" for maintaining stability, generating challenges on when and how to stop it. Because about 35-40% of patients on chronic therapy do not exhibit objective neurological signs of worsening after stopping IVIg but express subjective symptoms of fatigue, pains, spasms, or a feeling of generalized weakness, a conditioning effect combined with fear that discontinuing chronic therapy may destabilize a multi-year stability status is likely. The dilemmas of continuing chronic therapy, the importance of adjusting dosing and scheduling or periodically stopping IVIg to objectively assess necessity, and concerns in accurately interpreting IVIg-dependency are discussed. Finally, the merit of subcutaneous IgG, the ineffectiveness of IVIg in IgG4-neurological autoimmunities, and genetic factors affecting IVIg dosing and efficacy are addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marinos C Dalakas
- Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Neuroimmunology Unit, Dept. of Pathophysiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Allen JA, Eftimov F, Querol L. Outcome measures and biomarkers in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: from research to clinical practice. Expert Rev Neurother 2021; 21:805-816. [PMID: 34130574 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2021.1944104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an immune-mediated syndrome characterized clinically by weakness and/or numbness that evolves over 2 months or more. The heterogeneity of clinical features necessitates an individualized approach to disease monitoring that takes lessons learned from clinical trials and applies them to clinical practice.Areas covered: This review discusses the importance of clinimetrics and biomarkers in CIDP diagnosis and disease monitoring. Highlighted are the challenges of defining responses to immunotherapy, the usefulness, and limitations of utilizing evidence-based clinical outcome measures during routine clinical care, and the evolving understanding of how diagnostic and disease activity biomarkers may reshape our treatment and disease monitoring paradigms.Expert opinion: Although disability and impairment outcome measures are commonly used in CIDP to indicate disease status, the nonspecific nature of these metrics limits the ability to attribute a change in any given metric to a change in CIDP. This interpretive challenge may be magnified by inconsistencies in the direction of change as well as a strong placebo effect. There is a need to improve our understanding of minimally important changes in existing outcome measures as a means to personalize treatment and to better assess disease activity status with biomarker discovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey A Allen
- Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Filip Eftimov
- Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luis Querol
- Neuromuscular Diseases Unit, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Perraudin C, Bourdin A, Vicino A, Kuntzer T, Bugnon O, Berger J. Home-based subcutaneous immunoglobulin for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy patients: A Swiss cost-minimization analysis. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0242630. [PMID: 33237959 PMCID: PMC7688145 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the cost of two patient management strategies with similar efficacies for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) patients in the chronic phase: hospital-based IV immunoglobulin G (IVIg) and home-based subcutaneous immunoglobulin G (SCIg) associated with an interprofessional drug therapy management programme (initial training and follow-up). METHODS A 48-week model-based cost-minimization analysis from a societal perspective was performed. Resources included immunoglobulin (IVIg: 1 g/kg/3 weeks; SCIg: 0.4 g/kg/week initially and 0.2 g/kg/week in the maintenance phase), hospital charges, time of professionals, infusion material, transport and losses of productivity for patients. Costs were expressed in Swiss francs (CHF) (1 CHF = 0.93€ = US$1.10, www.xe.com, 2020/10/28). RESULTS The total costs of IVIg were higher than those of SCIg for health insurance and other payers: 114,747 CHF versus 86,558 CHF and 8,762 CHF versus 2,401 CHF, respectively. The results were sensitive to the immunoglobulin doses, as this was the main cost driver. The SCIg daily cost in the initial phase was higher for health insurance than hospital-based IVIg was, but the additional costs were compensated during the maintenance phase (from week 28). The professional costs associated with the switch were not fully covered by the insurance and were borne by the pharmacist and the nurse. CONCLUSIONS SCIg for CIDP patients reinforced by an interprofessional drug therapy management programme may be a cost-effective and sustainable alternative to IVIg in the Swiss system context. From an economic perspective, this therapy alternative should be more widely supported by healthcare systems and proposed to eligible patients by professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clémence Perraudin
- Community Pharmacy, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- * E-mail:
| | - Aline Bourdin
- Community Pharmacy, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Alex Vicino
- Nerve-Muscle Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Thierry Kuntzer
- Nerve-Muscle Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Olivier Bugnon
- Community Pharmacy, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jérôme Berger
- Community Pharmacy, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|