1
|
Nachnani R, Knehans A, Neighbors JD, Kocis PT, Lee T, Tegeler K, Trite T, Raup-Konsavage WM, Vrana KE. Systematic review of drug-drug interactions of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol, and Cannabis. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1282831. [PMID: 38868665 PMCID: PMC11167383 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1282831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The recent exponential increase in legalized medical and recreational cannabis, development of medical cannabis programs, and production of unregulated over-the-counter products (e.g., cannabidiol (CBD) oil, and delta-8-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-8-THC)), has the potential to create unintended health consequences. The major cannabinoids (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol) are metabolized by the same cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes that metabolize most prescription medications and xenobiotics (CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2C19). As a result, we predict that there will be instances of drug-drug interactions and the potential for adverse outcomes, especially for prescription medications with a narrow therapeutic index. Methods We conducted a systematic review of all years to 2023 to identify real world reports of documented cannabinoid interactions with prescription medications. We limited our search to a set list of medications with predicted narrow therapeutic indices that may produce unintended adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Our team screened 4,600 reports and selected 151 full-text articles to assess for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results Our investigation revealed 31 reports for which cannabinoids altered pharmacokinetics and/or produced adverse events. These reports involved 16 different Narrow Therapeutic Index (NTI) medications, under six drug classes, 889 individual subjects and 603 cannabis/cannabinoid users. Interactions between cannabis/cannabinoids and warfarin, valproate, tacrolimus, and sirolimus were the most widely reported and may pose the greatest risk to patients. Common ADRs included bleeding risk, altered mental status, difficulty inducing anesthesia, and gastrointestinal distress. Additionally, we identified 18 instances (58%) in which clinicians uncovered an unexpected serum level of the prescribed drug. The quality of pharmacokinetic evidence for each report was assessed using an internally developed ten-point scale. Conclusion Drug-drug interactions with cannabinoids are likely amongst prescription medications that use common CYP450 systems. Our findings highlight the need for healthcare providers and patients/care-givers to openly communicate about cannabis/cannabinoid use to prevent unintended adverse events. To that end, we have developed a free online tool (www.CANN-DIR.psu.edu) to help identify potential cannabinoid drug-drug interactions with prescription medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Nachnani
- Department of Pharmacology, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States
| | - Amy Knehans
- Department of Library, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States
| | - Jeffrey D. Neighbors
- Department of Pharmacology, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States
| | - Paul T. Kocis
- Department of Pharmacology, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States
- Department of Pharmacy, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States
| | - Tzuo Lee
- PA Options for Wellness, Harrisburg, PA, United States
| | - Kayla Tegeler
- PA Options for Wellness, Harrisburg, PA, United States
| | - Thomas Trite
- PA Options for Wellness, Harrisburg, PA, United States
| | - Wesley M. Raup-Konsavage
- Department of Pharmacology, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States
| | - Kent E. Vrana
- Department of Pharmacology, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kelly LE, Rieder MJ, Finkelstein Y. Medical cannabis for children: Evidence and recommendations. Paediatr Child Health 2024; 29:104-121. [PMID: 38586483 PMCID: PMC10996577 DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxad078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Interest in using cannabis products for a medical purpose in children under the age of 18 years is increasing. There are many medical cannabis products available that can include cannabidiol (CBD) or delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), or both. Despite many therapeutic claims, there are few rigorous studies to inform the dosing, safety, and efficacy of medical cannabis in paediatric clinical practice. This statement reviews the current evidence and provides recommendations for using medical cannabis in children. Longer-term (2-year) reports support the sustained tolerability and efficacy of cannabidiol therapy for patients with Lennox-Gastaut and Dravet syndromes. CBD-enriched cannabis extracts containing small amounts of THC have been evaluated in a small number of paediatric patients, and further research is needed to inform clinical practice guidelines. Given the widespread use of medical cannabis in Canada, paediatricians should be prepared to engage in open, ongoing discussions with families about its potential benefits and risks, and develop individualized plans that monitor efficacy, reduce harms, and mitigate drug-drug interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren E Kelly
- Canadian Paediatric Society, Drug Therapy Committee, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael J Rieder
- Canadian Paediatric Society, Drug Therapy Committee, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yaron Finkelstein
- Canadian Paediatric Society, Drug Therapy Committee, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kelly LE, Rieder MJ, Finkelstein Y. Les données probantes et les recommandations sur le cannabis à des fins médicales chez les enfants. Paediatr Child Health 2024; 29:104-121. [PMID: 38586491 PMCID: PMC10996578 DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxad077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
L'intérêt envers l'utilisation des produits du cannabis à des fins médicales chez les enfants de moins de 18 ans augmente. De nombreux produits du cannabis à des fins médicales contiennent du cannabidiol, du delta-9-tétrahydrocannabinol ou ces deux produits. Malgré les nombreuses prétentions thérapeutiques, peu d'études rigoureuses guident la posologie, l'innocuité et l'efficacité du cannabis à des fins médicales en pédiatrie clinique. Le présent document de principes passe en revue les données probantes à jour et expose les recommandations sur l'utilisation du cannabis à des fins médicales chez les enfants. Les rapports à plus long terme (deux ans) souscrivent à la tolérabilité et à l'efficacité soutenues d'un traitement au cannabidiol chez les patients ayant le syndrome de Lennox-Gastaut ou le syndrome de Dravet. Les extraits de cannabis enrichis de cannabidiol qui renferment de petites quantités de delta-9-tétrahydrocannabinol ont été évalués auprès d'un petit nombre de patients d'âge pédiatrique, et d'autres recherches devront être réalisées pour éclairer les guides de pratique clinique. Étant donné l'utilisation répandue du cannabis à des fins médicales au Canada, les pédiatres devraient être prêts à participer à des échanges ouverts et continus avec les familles au sujet de ses avantages potentiels et de ses risques, ainsi qu'à préparer des plans individuels en vue d'en surveiller l'efficacité, de réduire les méfaits et de limiter les interactions médicamenteuses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren E Kelly
- Société canadienne de pédiatrie, comité de la pharmacologie, Ottawa (Ontario)Canada
| | - Michael J Rieder
- Société canadienne de pédiatrie, comité de la pharmacologie, Ottawa (Ontario)Canada
| | - Yaron Finkelstein
- Société canadienne de pédiatrie, comité de la pharmacologie, Ottawa (Ontario)Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maldonado C, Peyraube R, Fagiolino P, Oricchio F, Cuñetti L, Vázquez M. Human Data on Pharmacokinetic Interactions of Cannabinoids: A Narrative Review. Curr Pharm Des 2024; 30:241-254. [PMID: 38288797 DOI: 10.2174/0113816128288510240113170116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
Concomitant use of cannabinoids with other drugs may result in pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions, mainly due to the mechanism involving Phase I and Phase II enzymes and/or efflux transporters. Cannabinoids are not only substrates but also inhibitors or inducers of some of these enzymes and/or transporters. This narrative review aims to provide the available information reported in the literature regarding human data on the pharmacokinetic interactions of cannabinoids with other medications. A search on Pubmed/Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library was performed. Some studies were identified with Google search. Additional articles of interest were obtained through cross-referencing of published literature. All original research papers discussing interactions between cannabinoids, used for medical or recreational/adult-use purposes, and other medications in humans were included. Thirty-two studies with medicinal or recreational/adult-use cannabis were identified (seventeen case reports/series, thirteen clinical trials, and two retrospective analyses). In three of these studies, a bidirectional pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction was reported. In the rest of the studies, cannabinoids were the perpetrators, as in most of them, concentrations of cannabinoids were not measured. In light of the widespread use of prescribed and non-prescribed cannabinoids with other medications, pharmacokinetic interactions are likely to occur. Physicians should be aware of these potential interactions and closely monitor drug levels and/or responses. The existing literature regarding pharmacokinetic interactions is limited, and for some drugs, studies have relatively small cohorts or are only case reports. Therefore, there is a need for high-quality pharmacological studies on cannabinoid-drug interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia Maldonado
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Chemistry, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Raquel Peyraube
- Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable - MEC, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Pietro Fagiolino
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Chemistry, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Florencia Oricchio
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Chemistry, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Leticia Cuñetti
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Nephrology and Urology Institute, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Marta Vázquez
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Chemistry, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tien Y. Valproic Acid Induced Thrombocytopenia in an Elderly Man with Schizoaffective Disorder: A Case Report. PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY 2023; 56:204-205. [PMID: 37604167 DOI: 10.1055/a-2142-8708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Tien
- Psychiatry, Taoyuan Psychiatric Center Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cannabis-based magistral formulation is highly effective as an adjuvant treatment in drug-resistant focal epilepsy in adult patients: an open-label prospective cohort study. Neurol Sci 2023; 44:297-304. [PMID: 36129615 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-022-06393-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The safety and efficacy of a formulation high in cannabidiol (CBD) and low in ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) to treat drug-resistant epilepsy have been examined previously in children, but not in adult population. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether CBD-rich oil, as an add-on treatment to conventional antiepileptic drugs, was effective, safe, and well-tolerated in adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRFE). METHODS An open-label, prospective cohort, single-center in adult patients with DRFE, were receiving stable doses of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). A cannabis based-magistral formulation (CBMF) (100 mg/ml CBD and THC <1.9 mg/ml) was administrated 0.1 ml sublingually every 12 hours, up-titrated weekly. The primary outcome was to establish a reduction in seizures frequency >50% at 12 weeks. Adverse-drug reactions monitoring was done. p-value <0.05 was statistically significant. RESULTS Between August 2020 and July 2022, 44 (38.6%) patients completed >3 months of follow-up. The median daily dose of CBD was 200 mg, that of THC was 4 mg, and that of CBD per kilogram of weight was 3.7 mg. The median number of seizures per month before CBD treatment was 11, and after CBD treatment was 2.5 (p<0.001). A reduction in seizures >50% at 12 week was achieved in 79.5% of the patients. The median percentage change in seizure frequency per month was 84.1% at 12 weeks. Five patients reported any adverse-drug reactions. CONCLUSION The CBMF is a highly effective and safety therapy to treat adult patients with DRFE. The reduction in seizures frequency is maintained over time.
Collapse
|
7
|
Outcomes from a Spanish Expanded Access Program on cannabidiol treatment in pediatric and adult patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2022; 137:108958. [PMID: 36327646 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of cannabidiol (CBD) in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies, including Dravet syndrome (DS), and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), in a Spanish Expanded Access Program (EAP). METHODS This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study of patients treated with purified CBD in 14 hospitals across Spain. Patients with (1) written informed consent and (2) at least 6 months follow-up before the closure of the database were included. Primary effectiveness endpoints included reductions (100 %, ≥75 %, ≥50 %, ≥25 %, or 0 %) or worsening in seizure frequency (all seizure types and most disabling seizures) at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month visits and at the last visit, and median relative seizure reduction between baseline and last visit. Secondary effectiveness endpoints included retention rate, reduction in seizure severity, status epilepticus, healthcare utilization, and quality of life. Primary safety endpoints included rates of adverse events (AEs) and AEs leading to discontinuation. RESULTS One hundred and two patients (DS 12 %; LGS 59 %; other epilepsy syndromes 29 %) with a mean age of 15.9 years were enrolled. Patients were highly refractory to antiseizure medications (ASMs); mean number of prior failed ASMs was 7.5 (SD 3.7). The mean CBD dose was 13.0 mg/kg/day at the last visit. The proportion of patients with ≥50 % reduction in the total number of seizures from baseline was 44.9 % at 6 months and 38.9 % at 12 months. The median number of total seizures per month reduced by 47.6 % from baseline to the last visit. At 12 months, seizure severity was lower in 33/54 patients (61.1 %) and unchanged in 17/54 patients (31.5 %). Quality of life, based on the CAVE scale, increased from a mean score of 17.9 ± 4.7 (n = 54) at baseline to 21.7 ± 5.5 (n = 51) at the last patient visit (21.2 % improvement). The mean treatment retention time was 10.3 months. There were no statistically significant changes in the number of status epilepticus episodes, but lower healthcare utilization was observed. Adverse events occurred in sixty-eight patients (66.7 %), and the most common were somnolence (34.3 %) and diarrhea (12.7 %). Cannabidiol was discontinued exclusively due to AEs in 7.8 % of patients, increasing to 25.5 % when both lack of efficacy and AEs were considered together. CONCLUSIONS Cannabidiol demonstrated promising effectiveness and tolerability in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies taking part in a Spanish EAP.
Collapse
|
8
|
Graham M, Martin J, Lucas C, Murnion B, Schneider J. Cannabidiol drug interaction considerations for prescribers and pharmacists. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2022; 15:1383-1397. [DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2022.2142114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Myfanwy Graham
- Australian Centre for Cannabinoid Clinical and Research Excellence, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Drug Repurposing & Medicines Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jennifer Martin
- Australian Centre for Cannabinoid Clinical and Research Excellence, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Drug Repurposing & Medicines Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Catherine Lucas
- Australian Centre for Cannabinoid Clinical and Research Excellence, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Drug Repurposing & Medicines Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bridin Murnion
- Discipline of Addiction Medicine, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jennifer Schneider
- Australian Centre for Cannabinoid Clinical and Research Excellence, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Drug Repurposing & Medicines Research, School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lopera V, Rodríguez A, Amariles P. Clinical Relevance of Drug Interactions with Cannabis: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11051154. [PMID: 35268245 PMCID: PMC8911401 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11051154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Concomitant use of cannabis with other drugs may lead to cannabis–drug interactions, mainly due to the pharmacokinetic mechanism involving the family of CYP450 isoenzymes. This narrative systematic review aimed to systematize the available information regarding clinical relevance of cannabis–drug interactions. We utilized the PubMed/Medline database for this systematic review, using the terms drug interactions and cannabis, between June 2011 and June 2021. Articles with cannabis–drug interactions in humans, in English or Spanish, with full-text access were selected. Two researchers evaluated the article’s inclusion. The level of clinical relevance was determined according to the severity and probability of the interaction. Ninety-five articles were identified and twenty-six were included. Overall, 19 pairs of drug interactions with medicinal or recreational cannabis were identified in humans. According to severity and probability, 1, 2, 12, and 4 pairs of cannabis–drug interactions were classified at levels 1 (very high risk), 2 (high risk), 3 (medium risk), and 5 (without risk), respectively. Cannabis–warfarin was classified at level 1, and cannabis–buprenorphine and tacrolimus at level 2. This review provides evidence for both the low probability of the occurrence of clinically relevant drug interactions and the lack of evidence regarding cannabis–drug interactions.
Collapse
|
10
|
Strzelczyk A, Schubert-Bast S. A Practical Guide to the Treatment of Dravet Syndrome with Anti-Seizure Medication. CNS Drugs 2022; 36:217-237. [PMID: 35156171 PMCID: PMC8927048 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-022-00898-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Dravet syndrome is a severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathy characterised by refractory seizures and cognitive dysfunction. The treatment is challenging, not least because the seizures are highly drug resistant, requiring multiple anti-seizure medications (ASMs), while some ASMs can exacerbate seizures. Initial treatments include the broad-spectrum ASMs valproate (VPA), and clobazam (CLB) in some regions; however, they are generally insufficient to control seizures. With this in mind, three adjunct ASMs have been approved specifically for the treatment of seizures in patients with Dravet syndrome: stiripentol (STP) in 2007 in the European Union and 2018 in the USA, cannabidiol (CBD) in 2018/2019 (in combination with CLB in the European Union) and fenfluramine (FFA) in 2020. These "add-on" therapies (mostly to VPA/CLB) are used as escalation therapies, with the choice dependent on availability in different countries, patient characteristics and caregiver preferences. Topiramate is also frequently used, with evidence of efficacy in Dravet syndrome, and there is anecdotal evidence of efficacy with bromide, which is frequently used in Germany and Japan. With a growing treatment landscape for Dravet syndrome, there can be practical challenges for clinicians, particularly with issues associated with polypharmacy. This practical guide provides an overview of these main ASMs including their indications/contraindications, mechanism of action, efficacy, safety and tolerability profile, dosage requirements, and laboratory and clinical parameters to be evaluated. Standard laboratory and clinical parameters include blood counts, liver function tests, serum concentrations of ASMs, monitoring the growth of children, as well as weight loss and acceleration of behavioural problems. Regular cardiac monitoring is also important with FFA as it has previously been associated with cases of cardiac valve disease when used in adults at high doses (up to 120 mg/day) in combination with phentermine as a therapy for obesity. Importantly, no signs of heart valve disease have been documented to date at the low doses used in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. In addition, potential drug-drug interactions and their consequences are a key consideration in everyday practice. Interactions that potentially require dosage adjustments to alleviate adverse events include the following: STP + CLB resulting in increased plasma concentrations of CLB and its active metabolite norclobazam may increase somnolence, and an interaction with STP and VPA may increase gastrointestinal adverse events. Cannabidiol has a bi-directional interaction with CLB producing an increase in plasma concentrations of 7-OH-CBD and norclobazam resulting in the potential for increased somnolence and sedation. In addition, CBD is associated with elevations of liver transaminases particularly in patients taking concomitant VPA. The interaction between FFA and STP requires a dose reduction of FFA. Furthermore, concomitant administration of VPA with topiramate has been associated with encephalopathy and/or hyperammonaemia. Finally, we briefly describe other ASMs used in Dravet syndrome, and current key clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Strzelczyk
- Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Center of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Schleusenweg 2-16 (Haus 95), 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. .,LOEWE Center for Personalized and Translational Epilepsy Research (CePTER), Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Susanne Schubert-Bast
- grid.7839.50000 0004 1936 9721Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Center of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Schleusenweg 2-16 (Haus 95), 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany ,grid.7839.50000 0004 1936 9721LOEWE Center for Personalized and Translational Epilepsy Research (CePTER), Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany ,grid.7839.50000 0004 1936 9721Department of Neuropediatrics, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schoonjans A, Maes P, Ceulemans B. Aggravation of valproic acid induced thrombocytopenia after the introduction of fenfluramine, a case report. Seizure 2021; 93:60-62. [PMID: 34706322 DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A Schoonjans
- Department of Pediatric neurology, University Hospital of Antwerp, Antwerp University, Drie Eikenstraat 655, Edegem 2650, Belgium.
| | - P Maes
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital of Antwerp, Antwerp University, Edegem, Belgium
| | - B Ceulemans
- Department of Pediatric neurology, University Hospital of Antwerp, Antwerp University, Drie Eikenstraat 655, Edegem 2650, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Iannone LF, Arena G, Battaglia D, Bisulli F, Bonanni P, Boni A, Canevini MP, Cantalupo G, Cesaroni E, Contin M, Coppola A, Cordelli DM, Cricchiuti G, De Giorgis V, De Leva MF, De Rinaldis M, d'Orsi G, Elia M, Galimberti CA, Morano A, Granata T, Guerrini R, Lodi MAM, La Neve A, Marchese F, Masnada S, Michelucci R, Nosadini M, Pilolli N, Pruna D, Ragona F, Rosati A, Santucci M, Spalice A, Pietrafusa N, Striano P, Tartara E, Tassi L, Papa A, Zucca C, Russo E, Mecarelli O. Results From an Italian Expanded Access Program on Cannabidiol Treatment in Highly Refractory Dravet Syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome. Front Neurol 2021; 12:673135. [PMID: 34093420 PMCID: PMC8173151 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.673135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Purified cannabidiol (CBD) was administered to highly refractory patients with Dravet (DS) or Lennox–Gastaut (LGS) syndromes in an ongoing expanded access program (EAP). Herein, we report interim results on CBD safety and seizure outcomes in patients treated for a 12-month period. Material and Methods: Thirty centers were enrolled from December 2018 to December 2019 within the open-label prospective EAP up to a maximum of 25 mg/kg per day. Adverse effects and liver function tests were assessed after 2 weeks; 1, 3, and 6 months of treatment; and periodically thereafter. Seizure endpoints were the percentage of patients with ≥50 and 100% reduction in seizures compared to baseline. Results: A total of 93 patients were enrolled and included in the safety analysis. Eighty-two patients [27 (32.9%) DS, 55 (67.1%) LGS] with at least 3 months of treatment have been included in the effectiveness analysis; median previously failed antiseizure medications was eight. Pediatric and adult patients were uniformly represented in the cohort. At 3-month follow-up, compared to the 28-day baseline period, the percentage of patients with at least a 50% reduction in seizure frequency was 40.2% (plus 1.2% seizure-free). Retention rate was similar according to diagnosis, while we found an increased number of patients remaining under treatment in the adult group. CBD was mostly coadministered with valproic acid (62.2%) and clobazam (41.5%). In the safety dataset, 29 (31.2%) dropped out: reasons were lack of efficacy [16 (17.2%)] and adverse events (AEs) [12 (12.9%)], and one met withdrawal criteria (1.1%). Most reported AEs were somnolence (22.6%) and diarrhea (11.9%), followed by transaminase elevation and loss of appetite. Conclusions: CBD is associated with improved seizure control also in a considerable proportion of highly refractory patients with DS and LGS independently from clobazam use. Overall, CBD safety and effectiveness are not dose-related in this cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Francesco Iannone
- Science of Health Department, School of Medicine, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Gabriele Arena
- Science of Health Department, School of Medicine, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Domenica Battaglia
- Pediatric Neurology, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Child Health Area, A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Bisulli
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Epilepsy Center (Reference Center for Rare and Complex Epilepsies - EpiCARE), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Bonanni
- Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Eugenio Medea, Scientific Institute, Treviso, Italy
| | - Antonella Boni
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Child Neuropsichiatry, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria Paola Canevini
- Department of Health Sciences, Epilepsy Center, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Gaetano Cantalupo
- Child Neuropsychiatry, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology, and Pediatrics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Cesaroni
- Child Neurology and Psychiatry Unit, G. Salesi Children's Hospital-University of Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Manuela Contin
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonietta Coppola
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive, and Odontostomatological Sciences, Epilepsy Centre, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Duccio Maria Cordelli
- IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, UOC Neuropsichiatria dell'età Pediatrica, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giovanni Cricchiuti
- Department of Pediatrics, Epilepsy Center, Institute of Medicine, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Valentina De Giorgis
- Department of Child Neurology and Psychiatry, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Maria Fulvia De Leva
- Pediatric Neurology, Department of Neuroscience, Santobono-Pausilipon Children's Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Marta De Rinaldis
- Unit for Severe Disabilities in Developmental Age and Young Adults (Developmental Neurology and Neurorehabilitation), Scientific Institute Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) "E. Medea", Brindisi, Italy
| | - Giuseppe d'Orsi
- Epilepsy Centre - Clinic of Nervous System Diseases, Riuniti Hospital, Foggia, Italy
| | - Maurizio Elia
- Oasi Research Institute Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Troina, Italy
| | - Carlo Andrea Galimberti
- Epilepsy Center, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Alessandra Morano
- Neurology Unit, Department of Human Neurosciences, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy
| | - Tiziana Granata
- Department of Pediatric Neuroscience, Fondazione Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Renzo Guerrini
- Pediatric Neurology, Neurogenetics, and Neurobiology Unit and Laboratories, A. Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Monica A M Lodi
- Pediatric Neurology Unit, Epilepsy Center, Department of Neuroscience, "Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico" Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Angela La Neve
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesca Marchese
- Pediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) 'G. Gaslini' Institute, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal, and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Silvia Masnada
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, V. Buzzi Children's Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Michelucci
- Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Unit of Neurology, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Margherita Nosadini
- Paediatric Neurology and Neurophysiology Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Nicola Pilolli
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Dario Pruna
- Pediatric Neurology and Epileptology Unit, Brotzu Hospital Trust, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Francesca Ragona
- Department of Pediatric Neuroscience, Fondazione Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Rosati
- Pediatric Neurology, Neurogenetics, and Neurobiology Unit and Laboratories, A. Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Margherita Santucci
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Child Neuropsichiatry, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alberto Spalice
- Child Neurology Division, Department of Pediatrics, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola Pietrafusa
- Neurology Unit, Department of Neurosciences (N.S., M.T.), Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rome, Italy
| | - Pasquale Striano
- Pediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) 'G. Gaslini' Institute, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal, and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Elena Tartara
- Epilepsy Center, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Laura Tassi
- Claudio Munari" Epilepsy Surgery Centre, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Amanda Papa
- Child Neuropsychiatry Department, Maggiore della Carità University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Claudio Zucca
- Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Eugenio Medea, Scientific Institute, Lecco, Italy
| | - Emilio Russo
- Science of Health Department, School of Medicine, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Oriano Mecarelli
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lattanzi S, Trinka E, Striano P, Rocchi C, Salvemini S, Silvestrini M, Brigo F. Highly Purified Cannabidiol for Epilepsy Treatment: A Systematic Review of Epileptic Conditions Beyond Dravet Syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome. CNS Drugs 2021; 35:265-281. [PMID: 33754312 PMCID: PMC8005394 DOI: 10.1007/s40263-021-00807-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cannabidiol (CBD), which is one major constituent of the Cannabis sativa plant, has anti-seizure properties and does not produce euphoric or intrusive side effects. A plant-derived, highly purified CBD formulation with a known and constant composition has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of seizures associated with Dravet syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, and tuberous sclerosis complex. In the European Union, the drug has been authorized by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of seizures associated with Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, in conjunction with clobazam, and is under regulatory review for the treatment of seizures in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex. OBJECTIVES This systematic review aimed to summarize the currently available body of knowledge about the use of this US Food and Drug Administration/European Medicines Agency-approved oral formulation of pharmaceutical-grade CBD in patients with epileptic conditions, especially developmental and epileptic encephalopathies other than Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. METHODS The relevant studies were identified through MEDLINE and the US National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry in October 2020. There were no date limitations or language restrictions. The following types of studies were included: clinical trials, cohorts, case-control, cross-sectional, clinical series, and case reports. Participants had to meet the following criteria: any sex, any ethnicity, any age, diagnosis of epilepsy, receiving plant-derived, highly purified (> 98% w/w) CBD in a sesame oil-based oral solution for the treatment of seizures. Data extracted from selected records included efficacy, tolerability, and safety outcomes. RESULTS Five hundred and seventy records were identified by database and trial register searching. Fifty-seven studies were retrieved for detailed assessment, of which 42 were eventually included for the review. The participants of the studies included patients of both pediatric and adult age. Across the trials, purified CBD was administered at dosages up to 50 mg/kg/day. In a randomized double-blind controlled trial in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex, CBD was associated with a significantly greater percent reduction in seizure frequency than placebo over the treatment period. Open-label studies suggested the effectiveness of CBD in the treatment of children and adults presenting with other epilepsy syndromes than those addressed by regulatory trials, including CDKL5 deficiency disorder and Aicardi, Dup15q, and Doose syndromes, SYNGAP1 encephalopathy, and epilepsy with myoclonic absences. The most common adverse events observed during treatment with CBD included somnolence, decreased appetite, diarrhea, and increased serum aminotransferases. CONCLUSIONS The currently available data suggest that response to treatment with a highly purified, plant-derived CBD oil-based solution can be seen in patients across a broad range of epilepsy disorders and etiologies. The existing evidence can provide preliminary support for additional research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Lattanzi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Neurological Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, Via Conca 71, 60020, Ancona, Italy.
| | - Eugen Trinka
- Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.,Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Salzburg, Austria.,Public Health, Health Services Research and HTA, University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Pasquale Striano
- Pediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, "G. Gaslini" Institute, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Chiara Rocchi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Neurological Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, Via Conca 71, 60020, Ancona, Italy
| | - Sergio Salvemini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Neurological Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, Via Conca 71, 60020, Ancona, Italy
| | - Mauro Silvestrini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Neurological Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, Via Conca 71, 60020, Ancona, Italy
| | - Francesco Brigo
- Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Science, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.,Division of Neurology, "Franz Tappeiner" Hospital, Merano, BZ, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Malinowska B, Baranowska-Kuczko M, Kicman A, Schlicker E. Opportunities, Challenges and Pitfalls of Using Cannabidiol as an Adjuvant Drug in COVID-19. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:1986. [PMID: 33671463 PMCID: PMC7922403 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22041986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection may lead to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) which, in turn, may be associated with multiple organ dysfunction. In this review, we present advantages and disadvantages of cannabidiol (CBD), a non-intoxicating phytocannabinoid from the cannabis plant, as a potential agent for the treatment of COVID-19. CBD has been shown to downregulate proteins responsible for viral entry and to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication. Preclinical studies have demonstrated its effectiveness against diseases of the respiratory system as well as its cardioprotective, nephroprotective, hepatoprotective, neuroprotective and anti-convulsant properties, that is, effects that may be beneficial for COVID-19. Only the latter two properties have been demonstrated in clinical studies, which also revealed anxiolytic and antinociceptive effects of CBD (given alone or together with Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol), which may be important for an adjuvant treatment to improve the quality of life in patients with COVID-19 and to limit post-traumatic stress symptoms. However, one should be aware of side effects of CBD (which are rarely serious), drug interactions (also extending to drugs acting against COVID-19) and the proper route of its administration (vaping may be dangerous). Clearly, further clinical studies are necessary to prove the suitability of CBD for the treatment of COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Malinowska
- Department of Experimental Physiology and Pathophysiology, Medical University of Białystok, 15-222 Białystok, Poland; (M.B.-K.); (A.K.)
| | - Marta Baranowska-Kuczko
- Department of Experimental Physiology and Pathophysiology, Medical University of Białystok, 15-222 Białystok, Poland; (M.B.-K.); (A.K.)
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Medical University of Białystok, 15-222 Białystok, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Kicman
- Department of Experimental Physiology and Pathophysiology, Medical University of Białystok, 15-222 Białystok, Poland; (M.B.-K.); (A.K.)
| | - Eberhard Schlicker
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lattanzi S, Zaccara G, Russo E, La Neve A, Lodi MAM, Striano P. Practical use of pharmaceutically purified oral cannabidiol in Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Expert Rev Neurother 2020; 21:99-110. [PMID: 33026899 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2021.1834383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pharmaceutically purified oral cannabidiol (CBD) has been recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency as treatment of seizures associated with Dravet syndrome (DS) and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), which are severe and difficult-to-treat developmental and epileptic encephalopathies with onset in early childhood. AREAS COVERED This review will critically review the pharmacokinetic properties of CBD, the interactions with antiseizure and non-antiseizure medications, and the main tolerability and safety issues to provide guidance for its use in everyday practice. EXPERT OPINION CBD is metabolized in the liver and can influence the activity of enzymes involved in drug metabolism. The best characterized drug-drug interaction is between CBD and clobazam. The most common adverse events include somnolence, gastrointestinal discomfort, and increase in serum transaminases. High-grade purified CBD oral solution represents an effective therapeutic option in patients with DS and LGS. The findings cannot be extrapolated to other cannabis-based products, synthetic cannabinoids for medicinal use and non-medicinal cannabis and CBD derivatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Lattanzi
- Neurological Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Marche Polytechnic University , Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Emilio Russo
- Department of Science of Health, University of Catanzaro , Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Angela La Neve
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari , Italy
| | - Monica Anna Maria Lodi
- Department of Child Neuropsychiatry, Epilepsy Center, Fatebenefratelli Hospital , Milan, Italy
| | - Pasquale Striano
- Pediatric Neurology and Muscular Diseases Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, "G. Gaslini" Institute, University of Genoa , Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|