Management of epilepsy in older adults: A critical review by the ILAE Task Force on Epilepsy in the elderly

Presenteeism in people with previous and current epilepsy: Determinants and psychosocial associations

OBJECTIVE

We examined people with epilepsy (PWE) regarding presenteeism, an aspect of reduced work productivity due to health-related issues despite physical presence, with a focus on epilepsy treatment and psychosocial factors.

METHODS

We used data from 32,000 participants aged 16-83 years old that were obtained through a 2024 nationwide internet survey. The Work Functioning Impairment Scale, which measures "presenteeism," was used to compare participants with and without a history of epilepsy. Odds ratios for presenteeism were calculated using univariable and multivariable analyses with two models based on sociodemographic and health-related variables. Propensity score matching was applied to equate groups with and without epilepsy in health-related variables.

RESULTS

Among 29,268 participants with valid responses, those with current epilepsy (n = 351) and in remission (n = 429) exhibited significantly higher presenteeism (p < 0.0001) and psychological distress (p < 0.0001) versus participants without epilepsy (n = 28,488). Multivariable analysis confirmed current epilepsy was independently associated with higher presenteeism (odds ratio: 2.61; 95 % confidence interval: 2.05-3.33, p < 0.0001) in the sociodemographic model. After propensity score matching of 277 non-epilepsy and epilepsy participants, presenteeism remained significantly higher in current epilepsy patients versus those without (44.0 % vs. 28.2 %, p < 0.0001). When further adjusted for psychological disorders, the difference in presenteeism became negligible (46.2 % vs. 44.0 %, p = 0.716).

SIGNIFICANCE

This cross-sectional study confirms significant presenteeism in PWE, which persists even in remission cases. This suggests that multiple causal conditions, rather than epileptic activity itself, affect presenteeism. As the epilepsy effect on presenteeism substantially decreases when accounting for psychological disorders, addressing these disorders may promote social productivity in PWE.

The implications of frailty in older adults with epilepsy

Older adults constitute a large proportion of people with epilepsy (PWE) due to the changing demographics worldwide and epilepsy's natural history. Aging-related pathophysiological changes lower the tolerance and increase our vulnerability to stressors, which manifests as frailty. Frailty is closely associated with adverse health outcomes. This narrative review examines the interplay between frailty and epilepsy, especially in older adults, emphasizing its clinical implications, including its role in managing PWE. Mechanistically, frailty develops through complex interactions among molecular and cellular damage, including genomic instability, mitochondrial dysfunction, and hormonal changes. These contribute to systemic muscle mass, bone density, and organ function decline. The concept of frailty has evolved from a primarily physical syndrome to include social, psychological, and cognitive dimensions. The "phenotypic frailty" model, which focuses on physical performance, and the "deficit accumulation" model, which quantifies health deficits, provide frameworks for understanding and assessing frailty. PWE are potentially more prone to developing frailty due to a higher prevalence of risk factors predisposing to frailty. These include, but are not limited to, polypharmacy, higher comorbidity, low exercise level, social isolation, low vitamin D, and osteoporosis. We lack commercial biomarkers to measure frailty but can diagnose it using self- or healthcare provider-administered frailty scales. Recent attempts to develop a PWE-specific frailty scale are promising. Unlike chronological age, frailty is reversible, so its management using multidisciplinary care teams should be strongly considered. Frailty can affect antiseizure medication (ASM) tolerance secondary to its impact on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. While frailty's effect on seizure control efficacy of ASM is poorly understood, its undoubted association with overall poor outcomes, including epilepsy surgery, behooves us to consider its presence and implication while treating older PWE. Incorporation of frailty measures in future research is essential to improve our understanding of frailty's role in PWE health. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Frailty is the declining state of the human body. People with epilepsy are more prone to it. It should be factored into their management.

New onset seizures in Octogenarians

PURPOSE

The occurrence of new seizure(s) in older adults is two- to three-fold higher as compared to the younger population, and previous studies have characterized the clinical features of seizures in patients beyond 60 or 65 years. This study, in response to the recent ILAE task force on epilepsy in the elderly (2023), has assessed the clinical characteristics of individuals who are over 85 years old.

METHODS

Data was collected from prospectively maintained electronic medical records, and the participants were divided into seizure-free and seizure-recurrence groups, and their clinical characteristics were compared.

RESULTS

Over a 30-year period, a single comprehensive epilepsy care center included a total of 40 patients, with a mean age of 88.7 ± 2.79 years - most common seizure type was generalized tonic-clonic seizures (45%), with a positive neuroimaging yield of 42.5% and an EEG showing specific abnormalities in 50% of cases. Etiology was unidentified in 50%, while stroke was the most common among identified etiologies (27.5%). Over a mean follow-up of 1.4 [0.2-5.8] years, monotherapy effectively controlled 62.5% of patients, but 47.5% experienced recurrence. When compared to the non-recurrence group, these patients showed significant risk factors such as a history of prior stroke [47.3% versus 23.8%, p = 0.031], use of phenytoin [68.4% versus 33.3%, p = 0.056], and clobazam [42.1% vs. 19%, p = 0.049].

CONCLUSION

This study contributes to better identification and improved characterization of late-onset seizures and adds that appropriate, timely management results in better outcomes.

Mortality in older adults with epilepsy: An understudied entity

Despite the recognition of Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) and other risks of premature mortality in people with epilepsy (PWE), mortality in older PWE remains an understudied entity. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the multifaceted causes of premature mortality in older adults with epilepsy and emphasizes the need for targeted interventions to reduce mortality and enhance the quality of life in this vulnerable population. It underscores the heightened prevalence of epilepsy among older adults and the interplay of intrinsic and extrinsic factors contributing to their mortality. Further, this paper delves into the nuances of diagnosing SUDEP in older adults and the underestimation of its incidence due to misclassification and lack of standardized protocols. Factors such as frailty, comorbidities, and the bidirectional relationship between epilepsy and conditions such as dementia and stroke further compound the mortality risks. Key factors, including status epilepticus, comorbid conditions (such as cardiovascular diseases, cerebrovascular events, and neurodegenerative disorders), and external causes like accidents, falls, and suicide, are discussed. It also examines the implications of anti-seizure medications, particularly polypharmacy, and their adverse effects on this population. Future directions include implementing enhanced diagnostic protocols, developing treatment plans, and integrating real-time monitoring technologies to reduce the risk of sudden death and multifaceted premature mortality in this patient population. Increasing awareness among healthcare providers and families about the risks and management of epilepsy in older adults, along with fostering collaborative research efforts, is essential to improve mortality outcomes. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: There is a heightened risk of mortality in older people with epilepsy due to many causes unique to their population. Despite the risk, Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy and early mortality in older adults with epilepsy are underestimated. Unique contributing factors include comorbid conditions like dementia, stroke, and frailty, adverse effects from polypharmacy, and increased risks of cardiovascular complications and external injuries such as falls and suicide. A careful consideration of all these factors can help mitigate the mortality in older adults with epilepsy.

Relationship between anti-seizure medication and behaviors that challenge in older persons with intellectual disability and epilepsy: a review

INTRODUCTION

There is increased focus on the negative impact of the overprescribing of medication, specifically psychotropic medication, including anti-seizure medications (ASM), in people with Intellectual Disability (ID). This is particularly important for the older adult population, where multi-morbidity and polypharmacy are more common. ASMs are associated with psychiatric and behavioral adverse effects. Furthermore, there is growing awareness of the anticholinergic burden for older adults with epilepsy and ID and the relationship with behaviors that challenge (BtC).

AREAS COVERED

This review defines the older adult population and outlines the relationship between epilepsy and ID. BtC is outlined in the context of the population and the relationship with ASMs. The evidence base to guide prescribing and de-prescribing for newer ASMs is also presented, including pragmatic data.

EXPERT OPINION

Polypharmacy, particularly psychotropics, are a mortality risk factor for older adults with epilepsy and ID. Therefore, any BtC requires a holistic assessment with a multi-disciplinary approach. This includes specific consideration of all prescribed medicines in the context of polypharmacy. There should be routine reviews, at least annually, for those aged 40 years and over particularly focused on anticholinergic burden and/or polypharmacy.

Excess health care use is significantly and persistently reduced following diagnosis of late-onset epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of late-onset epilepsy (LOE) is rising, and these patients may use an excess of health care resources. This study aimed to measure pre-/post-diagnostic health care use (HCU) for patients with LOE compared to controls.

METHODS

This was an observational open cohort study covering years 1998-2019 using UK population-based linked primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink [CPRD]) and hospital (HES) electronic health records. The participants included patients with incident LOE enrolled in CPRD and 1:10 age-, sex-, and general practice-matched controls. The exposure was incident LOE (diagnosed at age ≥65) using a 5-year washout. The main outcome was all HCU (primary care [PC], accident and emergency [A&E], admitted patient and outpatient care) using inverse proportional weighting to PC use and HCU by setting. An interrupted time-series analysis was used to examine pre-/post-diagnostic HCU between patients with LOE and controls over 4 years either side of diagnosis/matching date. An adjusted mixed-effects negative binomial regression was used for post-diagnosis HCU interactions.

RESULTS

Of 2 569 874 people ≥65 years of age, 1048 (4%) developed incident LOE. Mean weighted total HCU increased by 32 visits per patient-year (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 13-50, p = .003) until LOE diagnosis, and then dropped by a mean of 60 visits per patient-year (95% CI: -81 to -40). There was an acute rise and fall over the 1-2 years immediately pre-/post-diagnosis. Incident HCU remained higher for LOE compared to controls post-diagnosis (adjusted incidence rate ratio: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.65-1.70; p < .001), including A&E, outpatient, and admitted care.

SIGNIFICANCE

Health care use demonstrates an acute on chronic rise over the 4 years before diagnosis of LOE. To what extent the partial reversal of the acute pre-diagnosis rise, and the mediators of the accelerated increase compared to controls are attributed to epilepsy, comorbid and bidirectional disease states, or a combination of both warrants further exploration.

Unraveling the nexus of age, epilepsy, and mitochondria: exploring the dynamics of cellular energy and excitability

Epilepsy, a complex neurological condition marked by recurring seizures, is increasingly recognized for its intricate relationship with mitochondria, the cellular powerhouses responsible for energy production and calcium regulation. This review offers an in-depth examination of the interplay between epilepsy, mitochondrial function, and aging. Many factors might account for the correlation between epilepsy and aging. Mitochondria, integral to cellular energy dynamics and neuronal excitability, perform a critical role in the pathophysiology of epilepsy. The mechanisms linking epilepsy and mitochondria are multifaceted, involving mitochondrial dysfunction, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and mitochondrial dynamics. Mitochondrial dysfunction can trigger seizures by compromising ATP production, increasing glutamate release, and altering ion channel function. ROS, natural byproducts of mitochondrial respiration, contribute to oxidative stress and neuroinflammation, critical factors in epileptogenesis. Mitochondrial dynamics govern fusion and fission processes, influence seizure threshold and calcium buffering, and impact seizure propagation. Energy demands during seizures highlight the critical role of mitochondrial ATP generation in maintaining neuronal membrane potential. Mitochondrial calcium handling dynamically modulates neuronal excitability, affecting synaptic transmission and action potential generation. Dysregulated mitochondrial calcium handling is a hallmark of epilepsy, contributing to excitotoxicity. Epigenetic modifications in epilepsy influence mitochondrial function through histone modifications, DNA methylation, and non-coding RNA expression. Potential therapeutic avenues targeting mitochondria in epilepsy include mitochondria-targeted antioxidants, ketogenic diets, and metabolic therapies. The review concludes by outlining future directions in epilepsy research, emphasizing integrative approaches, advancements in mitochondrial research, and ethical considerations. Mitochondria emerge as central players in the complex narrative of epilepsy, offering profound insights and therapeutic potential for this challenging neurological disorder.

Brivaracetam effectiveness and tolerability in older and younger adults with epilepsy: EXPERIENCE, a pooled analysis of international data from retrospective studies

This analysis assessed the effectiveness and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) in older (≥65 years of age) and younger (≥16 to <65 years of age) adults with epilepsy. This was a subgroup analysis from EXPERIENCE/EPD332, a pooled analysis of individual patient records from multiple independent, non-interventional studies of patients with epilepsy starting BRV in Australia, Europe, and the United States. Included patients had ≥6 months of follow-up data. Outcomes included responders (≥50 % reduction from baseline in seizure frequency), seizure freedom (no seizures within 3 months before the time point), and continuous seizure freedom (no seizures from baseline) at 12 months; BRV discontinuation during the whole study follow-up; and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) at 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients with missing data after BRV discontinuation were deemed non-responders/not seizure-free. Analysis populations included the Full Analysis Set (FAS; patients who received ≥1 BRV dose and had seizure type and age documented at baseline) and the modified FAS (FAS patients who had ≥1 seizure recorded during baseline). The FAS was used for all outcomes except seizure reduction. The FAS included 147 (8.9 %) patients aged ≥65 years and 1497 (91.1 %) aged ≥16 to <65 years. Compared with the younger subgroup, patients aged ≥65 years had a longer median epilepsy duration (33.0 years [n = 144] vs 17.0 years [n = 1460]) and lower median seizure frequency at index (2.0 seizures/28 days [n = 129] vs 4.0 seizures/28 days [n = 1256]), and less commonly had >1 prior antiseizure medication (106/141 [75.2 %] vs 1265/1479 [85.5 %]). At 12 months, a numerically higher percentage of patients aged ≥65 years versus the younger subgroup achieved ≥50 % seizure reduction (46.5 % [n = 71] vs 36.0 % [n = 751]), seizure freedom (26.0 % [n = 100] vs 13.9 % [n = 1011]), and continuous seizure freedom (22.0 % [n = 100] vs 10.7 % [n = 1011]). During the whole study follow-up, 43/147 (29.3 %) patients aged ≥65 years and 508/1492 (34.0 %) aged ≥16 to <65 years discontinued BRV. The incidence of TEAEs since the prior visit was similar in both subgroups at 3 months (≥65 years vs ≥16 to <65 years: 38/138 [27.5 %] vs 356/1404 [25.4 %]), 6 months (19/119 [16.0 %] vs 176/1257 [14.0 %]), and 12 months (8/104 [7.7 %] vs 107/1128 [9.5 %]). This real-world analysis suggests BRV was effective in patients aged ≥65 years and ≥16 to <65 years, with numerically higher effectiveness in the older subgroup. BRV was well tolerated in both subgroups.

Resective surgery for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy associated with hippocampal sclerosis in patients over 50 years: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy associated with hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE/HS) is the most common cause of drug-resistant focal seizures and surgical resection is the primary treatment option, with seizure-free rates ranging from 60 to 80%. However, data on postsurgical seizure outcomes in patients ≥ 50 years of age are limited. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of surgery in this age group compared to younger patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of data from resective surgeries conducted in patients with MTLE/HS between 1990 and 2022. We focused on patients aged ≥ 50 years and compared the surgical safety and efficacy variables between this group and a control group of patients aged < 50 years through a case-control study.

RESULTS

Among the 450 MTLE/HS patients who underwent surgery during the inclusion period, 61 (13.6%) were aged ≥ 50 years and matched with 183 younger patients, totaling 244 study participants. The two groups had similar characteristics. At the last follow-up (median 5.7 years), Engel I outcomes were achieved in 80.3% of the older patients and 81.4% of the younger patients, with no significant difference (p = 0.85). Postoperative cognitive and psychiatric outcomes did not differ between the groups. Major complication rates were also comparable, at 3.3% in the older group and 2.7% in the younger group (p = 0.83). The extratemporal ictal abnormalities observed on video-EEG were the only variable that demonstrated a significant association with an unfavorable seizure outcome in the older group (OR 9.3, 95% CI [1.8-47.6], p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides grade 3 evidence that resective surgery for MTLE/HS patients aged ≥ 50 years is as effective and safe as it is for younger patients, and thus should be considered as the primary treatment option for drug-resistant cases.

Validity of the MoCA as a cognitive screening tool in epilepsy: Are there implications for global care and research?

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of a widely available cognitive screener, the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), to detect cognitive impairment in older patients (age ≥ 55) with epilepsy residing in the US, using the International Classification of Cognitive Disorders in Epilepsy (IC-CoDE) as the gold standard.

METHODS

Fifty older adults with focal epilepsy completed the MoCA and neuropsychological measures of memory, language, executive function, and processing speed/attention. The IC-CoDE taxonomy divided participants into IC-CoDE Impaired and Intact groups. Sensitivity and specificity across several MoCA cutoffs were examined. Spearman correlations examined relationships between the MoCA total score and clinical and demographic variables and MoCA domain scores and individual neuropsychological tests.

RESULTS

IC-CoDE impaired patients demonstrated significantly lower scores on the MoCA total, visuospatial/executive, naming, language, delayed recall, and orientation domain scores (Cohen's d range: 0.336-2.77). The recommended MoCA cutoff score < 26 had an overall accuracy of 72%, 88.2% sensitivity, and 63.6% specificity. A MoCA cutoff score < 24 yielded optimal sensitivity (70.6%) and specificity (78.8%), with overall accuracy of 76%. Higher MoCA total scores were associated with greater years of education (p = 0.016) and fewer antiseizure medications (p = 0.049). The MoCA memory domain was associated with several standardized measures of memory, MoCA language domain with category fluency, and MoCA abstraction domain with letter fluency.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study provides initial validation of the MoCA as a useful screening tool for older adults with epilepsy that can be used to identify patients who may benefit from comprehensive neuropsychological testing. Further, we demonstrate that a lower cutoff (i.e., <24) better captures cognitive impairment in older adults with epilepsy than the generally recommended cutoff and provides evidence for construct overlap between MoCA domains and standard neuropsychological tests. Critically, similar efforts in other regions of the world are needed.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

The Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) can be a helpful tool to screen for cognitive impairment in older adults with epilepsy. We recommend that adults 55 or older with epilepsy who score less than 24 on the MoCA are referred to a neuropsychologist for a comprehensive evaluation to assess any changes in cognitive abilities and mood.

Structural and functional abnormalities and cognitive profiles in older adults with early-onset and late-onset focal epilepsy

This study aimed to determine the patterns of changes in structure, function, and cognitive ability in early-onset and late-onset older adults with focal epilepsy (OFE). This study first utilized the deformation-based morphometry analysis to identify structural abnormalities, which were used as the seed region to investigate the functional connectivity with the whole brain. Next, a correlation analysis was performed between the altered imaging findings and neuropsychiatry assessments. Finally, the potential role of structural-functional abnormalities in the diagnosis of epilepsy was further explored by using mediation analysis. Compared with healthy controls (n = 28), the area of reduced structural volume was concentrated in the bilateral cerebellum, right thalamus, and right middle cingulate cortex, with frontal, temporal, and occipital lobes also affected in early-onset focal epilepsy (n = 26), while late-onset patients (n = 31) displayed cerebellar, thalamic, and cingulate atrophy. Furthermore, correlation analyses suggest an association between structural abnormalities and cognitive assessments. Dysfunctional connectivity in the cerebellum, cingulate cortex, and frontal gyrus partially mediates the relationship between structural abnormalities and the diagnosis of early-onset focal epilepsy. This study identified structural and functional abnormalities in early-onset and late-onset focal epilepsy and explored characters in cognitive performance. Structural-functional coupling may play a potential role in the diagnosis of epilepsy.

Patient-centered outcomes and quality of life in elderly people with epilepsy: A focused review

The highly heterogeneous population of elderly with epilepsy continues to increase as the incidence of epilepsy rises with increasing life expectancy. There are many aspects to consider in the treatment of elderly with epilepsy, e g comorbidities and the complexity of polypharmacy. The literature on quality-of-life (QoL) and patient-centered outcomes in elderly in general as well as in elderly with epilepsy is limited, most of the existing studies report results from quality-of-life surveys. No such QoL questionnaires have, however, in the validation process explored issues specific to the elderly. Seizure frequency, co-morbidities and depression predicted QoL in elderly with epilepsy and the energy/fatigue domain scored worst when QOLIE-31 was used. In the handful of qualitative interview studies identified in this review, a number of topics specific for elderly with epilepsy were explored. Some of these were difficulties with information gathering, the importance of maintaining normalcy, incongruence with provider goals and wanting to be more involved in the treatment. There is a need for further exploration of the specific concerns of elderly with epilepsy. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the studies and emphasizes the importance of involving elderly people with epilepsy in their own care.

Current challenges in focal epilepsy treatment: An Italian Delphi consensus

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy, a globally prevalent neurological condition, presents distinct challenges in management, particularly for focal-onset types. This study aimed at addressing the current challenges and perspectives in focal epilepsy management, with focus on the Italian reality.

METHODS

Using the Delphi methodology, this research collected and analyzed the level of consensus of a panel of Italian epilepsy experts on key aspects of focal epilepsy care. Areas of focus included patient flow, treatment pathways, controlled versus uncontrolled epilepsy, follow-up protocols, and the relevance of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). This method allowed for a comprehensive assessment of consensus and divergences in clinical opinions and practices.

RESULTS

The study achieved consensus on 23 out of 26 statements, with three items failing to reach a consensus. There was strong agreement on the importance of timely intervention, individualized treatment plans, regular follow-ups at Epilepsy Centers, and the role of PROs in clinical practice. In cases of uncontrolled focal epilepsy, there was a clear inclination to pursue alternative treatment options following the failure of two previous therapies. Divergent views were evident on the inclusion of epilepsy surgery in treatment for uncontrolled epilepsy and the routine necessity of EEG evaluations in follow-ups. Other key findings included concerns about the lack of pediatric-specific research limiting current therapeutic options in this patient population, insufficient attention to the transition from pediatric to adult care, and need for improved communication. The results highlighted the complexities in managing epilepsy, with broad consensus on patient care aspects, yet notable divergences in specific treatment and management approaches.

CONCLUSION

The study offered valuable insights into the current state and complexities of managing focal-onset epilepsy. It highlighted many deficiencies in the therapeutic pathway of focal-onset epilepsy in the Italian reality, while it also underscored the importance of patient-centric care, the necessity of early and appropriate intervention, and individualized treatment approaches. The findings also called for continued research, policy development, and healthcare system improvements to enhance epilepsy management, highlighting the ongoing need for tailored healthcare solutions in this evolving field.

Assessing the Incidence Rate of Neuropsychiatric Adverse Effects in Older Adults Following Levetiracetam Initiation: A Retrospective Study

Background

Levetiracetam (LEV) is commonly prescribed for epilepsy management. However, neuropsychiatric disorders (NPDs) are concerning adverse effects that may result in medication discontinuation. This study aims to examine the incidence and factors influencing LEV associated NPDs in adult patients aged 50 years and above.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients aged 50 years and above prescribed LEV between 2010 and 2020, with at least one follow-up appointment six months post-treatment initiation. The incidence of new-onset or aggravated NPDs and variables potentially influencing this risk were examined. Independent t-test, chi-squared, and Fisher's exact test were used, in addition to univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

Results

The study included 100 patients with a mean age at LEV start of 63.31 years (SD = 16.48). Neuropsychiatric symptoms were observed in 6 (6.0%) patients. Factors associated with new-onset NPDs were younger age at epilepsy diagnosis (p=0.005), younger age at LEV start (p=0.004), and concurrent use of Carbamazepine/Oxcarbazepine (p=0.004). On multivariate analysis, only the association with Carbamazepine/Oxcarbazepine remained significant (OR 14.62, 95% CI 1.86-114.70, p=0.011).

Conclusion

The findings indicate that the incidence of NPDs in elderly patients is relatively low (6%). Further research with larger samples is needed in comparison with a younger sample as a control group to confirm these findings.

Diagnosing epileptic seizures in patients with Alzheimer's disease and deciding on the appropriate treatment plan

INTRODUCTION

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the predominant cause of dementia and a significant contributor to morbidity among the elderly. Patients diagnosed with AD face an increased risk of epileptic seizures.

AREAS COVERED

Herein, the authors review the challenges in the diagnosis of seizures in patients with AD, the risks of seizures related to medications used in AD and the pharmacological treatment of seizures in AD. The authors also provide the reader with their expert opinion on the subject matter and future perspectives.

EXPERT OPINION

Healthcare professionals should maintain a vigilant approach to suspecting seizures in AD patients. Acute symptomatic seizures triggered by metabolic disturbances, infections, toxins, or drug-related factors often have a low risk of recurrence. In such cases, addressing the underlying cause may suffice without initiating antiseizure medications (ASMs). However, unprovoked seizures in certain AD patients carry a higher risk of recurrence over time, warranting the use of ASMs. Although data is limited, both lamotrigine and levetiracetam appear to be reasonable choices for controlling seizures in elderly AD patients. Decisions should be informed by the best available evidence, the treating physician's clinical experience, and the patient's preferences.

Safety and Efficacy of Cenobamate for the Treatment of Focal Seizures in Older Patients: Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase III, Multicenter, Open-Label Study

BACKGROUND

Cenobamate is an antiseizure medication (ASM) approved in the US and Europe for the treatment of uncontrolled focal seizures.

OBJECTIVE

This post hoc analysis of a phase III, open-label safety study assessed the safety and efficacy of adjunctive cenobamate in older adults versus the overall study population.

METHODS

Adults aged 18-70 years with uncontrolled focal seizures taking stable doses of one to three ASMs were enrolled in the phase III, open-label safety study; adults aged 65-70 years from that study were included in our safety analysis. Discontinuations due to adverse events and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed throughout the study in all patients who received one or more doses of cenobamate (safety study population). Efficacy was assessed post hoc in patients who had adequate seizure data available (post hoc efficacy population); we assessed patients aged 65-70 years from that population. Overall, 100% responder rates were assessed in the post hoc efficacy maintenance-phase population in 3-month intervals. Concomitant ASM drug load changes were also measured. For each ASM, drug load was defined as the ratio of actual drug dose/day to the World Health Organization defined daily dose (DDD).

RESULTS

Of 1340 patients (mean age 39.7 years) in the safety study population, 42 were ≥ 65 years of age (mean age 67.0 years, 52.4% female). Median duration of exposure was 36.1 and 36.9 months for overall patients and older patients, respectively, and mean epilepsy duration was 22.9 and 38.5 years, respectively. At 1, 2, and 3 years, 80%, 72%, and 68% of patients overall, and 76%, 71%, and 69% of older patients, respectively, remained on cenobamate. Common TEAEs (≥ 20%) were somnolence and dizziness in overall patients, and somnolence, dizziness, fall, fatigue, balance disorder, and upper respiratory tract infection in older patients. Falls in older patients occurred after a mean 452.1 days of adjunctive cenobamate treatment (mean dose 262.5 mg/day; mean concomitant ASM drug load 2.46). Of 240 patients in the post hoc efficacy population, 18 were ≥ 65 years of age. Mean seizure frequency at baseline was 18.1 seizures/28 days for the efficacy population and 3.1 seizures/28 days for older patients. Rates of 100% seizure reduction within 3-month intervals during the maintenance phase increased over time for the overall population (n = 214) and older adults (n = 15), reaching 51.9% and 78.6%, respectively, by 24 months. Mean percentage change in concomitant ASM drug load, not including cenobamate, was reduced in the overall efficacy population (31.8%) and older patients (36.3%) after 24 months of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this post hoc analysis showed notable rates of efficacy in older patients taking adjunctive cenobamate. Rates of several individual TEAEs occurred more frequently in older patients. Further reductions in concomitant ASMs may be needed in older patients when starting cenobamate to avoid adverse effects such as somnolence, dizziness, and falls.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02535091.

Seizure Considerations in Older Adults and Geriatric Patients

Older adults account for 25% of first-time seizures, with many of these seizures caused by accumulated injuries and insults to the brain and comorbidities associated with aging or as a result of a life-threatening comorbidity, yet seizures in older adults are often so subtle that they are not recognized or treated. Once an older adult has 1 seizure, they are at higher risk of more seizures and ultimately a diagnosis of epilepsy. Epilepsy affects quality of life and safety and may jeopardize life itself in the older adult; thus, it is important to be able to recognize seizures in older adults and know what to do.

Perampanel as only add-on epilepsy treatment in elderly: A subgroup analysis of real-world data from retrospective, multicenter, observational study

INTRODUCTION

Drug management of epilepsy in the elderly presents unique but data on this population are scarce. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel (PER) used as only add-on to a background anti-seizure medication (ASM) in the elderly in a real-world setting.

METHODS

We performed a subgroup analysis of patients aged ≥65 years included in a previous 12-month multicenter study on adults. Treatment discontinuation, seizure frequency, and adverse events were recorded at 3, 6 and 12 months after PER introduction. Sub-analyses by early (≤1 previous ASM) or late PER add-on were also conducted.

RESULTS

The sample included 65 subjects (mean age: 75.7 ± 7.2 years), with mainly focal (73.8%) epilepsy. The mean PER daily dose was ≈4 mg during all follow-up. Retention rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 90.5%, 89.6%, and 79.4%ly. The baseline median normalized per 28-day seizure number significantly decreased at 3-, 6- and 12-month visits. One year after PER introduction, the responder rate (≥50% reduction in baseline seizure frequency) was 89.7%, with a seizure freedom rate of 72.4%. Adverse events occurred in 22 (34.9%) patients with dizziness and irritability being the most frequent. No major differences between early (41 patients, 63.1%), and late add-on groups were observed.

CONCLUSION

Adjunctive PER was effective and well-tolerated when used as only add-on treatment in elderly people with epilepsy in clinical practice, thus representing a suitable therapeutic option in this age category.

Prevalence of dementia in a level 4 university epilepsy center: how big is the problem?

Background

The relationship between epilepsy and dementia is currently a topic of great interest. Our study aimed to determine the prevalence of dementia diagnoses among patients of a large level 4 university epilepsy center.

Methods

In this retrospective monocentric study conducted at the Department of Epileptology of the University Hospital Bonn, we searched for dementia-related terms in a total of 145,501 medical letters from 40,360 adult patients who were seen between 2003 and 2021. Files with at least one hit were selected and analyzed with regard to diagnoses, age, age at epilepsy onset, and the question as to whether epilepsy preceded or followed the dementia diagnosis.

Results

Among the medical letters of 513 patients, dementia-related terms were found. The letters of 12.7% of these patients stated a dementia diagnosis, 6.6% were suspected of having dementia, 4.9% had mild cognitive impairment, and 6.6% had other neurodegenerative diseases without dementia. Taking all 40,360 patients into account, the prevalence of diagnosed or suspected dementia was 0.25%. An older age (≥60 years) and late-onset epilepsy (≥60 years), but not a longer epilepsy duration, increased the odds of dementia by 6.1 (CI 3.5-10.7) and 2.9 (CI 1.7-4.7), respectively. Additionally, vascular, metabolic, inflammatory, and behavioral mood-related comorbidities were commonly observed. Epilepsy tended to precede (23.2%) rather than follow (8.1%) the dementia diagnosis.

Conclusion

Despite the clear limitations of a selection bias and the potential underdiagnosis of dementia and underestimation of its prevalence when relying on the medical letters from a specialized center which rather focuses on epilepsy-related issues, the findings of this study offer valuable insights from the perspective of an epilepsy center. In this setting, the prevalence of dementia in epilepsy is rather low. However, physicians should be aware that the risk of dementia is higher in the elderly, in late-onset epilepsies, and when comorbid risk factors exist. Seizures can also be an early sign of a neurodegenerative disease. Future research should explicitly screen for dementia in patients with epilepsy and stratify them according to their underlying pathologies and comorbidities.