The evolution of sex along an environmental gradient

Clones on the run: The genomics of a recently expanded partially clonal species

Why species that in their core areas mainly reproduce sexually become enriched with clones in marginal populations ("geographic parthenogenesis") remains unclear. Earlier hypotheses have emphasized that selection might promote clonality because it protects locally adapted genotypes. On the other hand, it also hampers recombination and adaptation to changing conditions. The aim of the present study was to investigate the early stages of range expansion in a partially clonal species and what drives an increase in cloning during such expansion. We used genome-wide sequencing to investigate the origin and evolution of large clones formed in a macroalgal species (Fucus vesiculosus) during a recent expansion into the postglacial Baltic Sea. We found low but persistent clonality in core populations, while at range margins, large dominant clonal lineages had evolved repeatedly from different sexual populations. A range expansion model showed that even when asexual recruitment is less favourable than sexual recruitment in core populations, repeated bottlenecks at the expansion front can establish a genetically eroded clonal wave that spreads ahead of a sexual wave into the new area. Genetic variation decreases by drift following repeated bottlenecks at the expansion front. This results in the emerging clones having low expected heterozygosity, which corroborated our empirical observations. We conclude that Baker's Law (clones being favoured by uniparental reproductive assurance in new areas) can play an important role during range expansion in partially clonal species, resulting in a complex spatiotemporal mosaic of clonal and sexual lineages that might persist during thousands of generations.

The role of phenotypic plasticity in the establishment of range margins

It has been argued that adaptive phenotypic plasticity may facilitate range expansions over spatially and temporally variable environments. However, plasticity may induce fitness costs. This may hinder the evolution of plasticity. Earlier modelling studies examined the role of plasticity during range expansions of populations with fixed genetic variance. However, genetic variance evolves in natural populations. This may critically alter model outcomes. We ask: how does the capacity for plasticity in populations with evolving genetic variance alter range margins that populations without the capacity for plasticity are expected to attain? We answered this question using computer simulations and analytical approximations. We found a critical plasticity cost above which the capacity for plasticity has no impact on the expected range of the population. Below the critical cost, by contrast, plasticity facilitates range expansion, extending the range in comparison to that expected for populations without plasticity. We further found that populations may evolve plasticity to buffer temporal environmental fluctuations, but only when the plasticity cost is below the critical cost. Thus, the cost of plasticity is a key factor involved in range expansions of populations with the potential to express plastic response in the adaptive trait. This article is part of the theme issue 'Species' ranges in the face of changing environments (part I)'.