Effects of levosimendan on isolated human internal mammary artery and saphenous vein: concurrent use with conventional vasodilators

Perioperative diltiazem therapy was not associated with improved perioperative and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Background

Diltiazem has been used during the perioperative period in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to prevent arterial graft spasm. However, its long-term outcome effects remain unclear.

Methods

Patient records obtained from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Geisinger Clinic electronic health records between October 2008 and October 2018 were screened. Adult patients who had isolated CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass were included. Cohorts of patients who received diltiazem (DILT) and those who did not (non-DILT) were matched by propensity scores based on age, gender, surgical year, Society of Thoracic Surgeons mortality and morbidity scores, and number of arterial grafts. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were estimated for DILT vs non-DILT on short-term adverse outcomes. Long-term survival over time was compared between DILT vs non-DILT using Kaplan-Meier curves.

Results

Among the 1004 patients included in the analyses, IRRs for the DILT group relative to the non-DILT group were: 30-day all-cause mortality, IRR: 2.33, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91-5.96, P=0.07; postoperative myocardial ischaemia, IRR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.60-2.02, P=0.75; new onset atrial fibrillation, IRR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.78-1.43, P=0.73; stroke/transient ischaemic attack, IRR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.17-3.38, P=0.71. For long-term survival, Kaplan-Meier curves stratified by diltiazem revealed no differences in survival rates between DILT and non-DILT groups.

Conclusion

For patients undergoing on-pump CABG, perioperative diltiazem therapy did not show significant short- or long-term outcome advantages over those who did not receive diltiazem.

Comparative study of coronary artery bypass graft materials: reduced contraction and ADMA levels in internal mammary artery versus saphenous vein

BACKGROUND

Vasospasm and atherosclerosis due to low endothelial capacity are the most important causes of coronary artery bypass graft failure observed in internal mammary artery (IMA) and saphenous vein (SV). Vasospasm can be mimicked in in vitro studies by inducing vasoconstriction of graft materials. In the present study, we aimed to compare the vascular contraction induced by several spasmogens including prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF2α), phenylephrine (PE), leukotriene C4 (LTC4), LTD4, potassium chloride (KCl), and arachidonic acid between IMA and SV preparations. Furthermore, endothelial capacity, nitrite and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) levels were compared between two grafts.

METHODS

By using organ bath, contractile responses induced by different spasmogens were compared between IMA and SV preparations derived from patients underwent coronary artery bypass surgery (n=35). The endothelial capacity was determined by acetylcholine (ACh) -induced relaxation in PE-precontracted vessels. Nitrite and ADMA levels were measured in organ culture supernatant of IMA and SV preparations.

RESULTS

Contractile responses induced by PGE2, PGF2α, PE, LTC4, LTD4, KCl and arachidonic acid were significantly lower in IMA preparations versus SV preparations. ACh-induced relaxation was significantly more prominent in IMA than SV preparations. Nitrite levels were greater and ADMA levels were lower in IMA versus SV preparations.

CONCLUSIONS

IMA has reduced capacity to constrict to several vasoconstrictor agents. Furthermore, IMA has greater endothelial capacity associated with higher nitrite levels and lower ADMA levels. Our results support the greater patency rate observed in IMA versus SV preparations.

Perioperative diltiazem or nitroglycerin in on-pump coronary artery bypass: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

Arterial graft spasm is a severe complication after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Among numerous potential antispasmodic agents, systemic application of diltiazem and nitroglycerin had been investigated most frequently over the past three decades. However, it remains inconclusive if either or both agents could improve patient outcomes by preventing graft spasm when applied perioperatively, and, if so, which one would be a better choice. The current systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to summarize the data from all available randomized clinical trials of perioperative continuous intravenous infusion of diltiazem and/or nitroglycerin in patients undergoing on-pump CABG in order to define and compare their roles in graft spasm prevention and their impacts on perioperative outcomes.

Methods

We searched Ovid Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar and Cochrane Center for randomized controlled trials that reported outcome effects of perioperative continuous intravenous infusion of diltiazem and/or nitroglycerin in patients undergoing elective on-pump CABG. Conventional meta-analyses were conducted to evaluate the pairwise comparisons (diltiazem vs. placebo; nitroglycerin vs. placebo; diltiazem vs. nitroglycerin) on perioperative outcomes. Network meta-analyses were implemented to compare the three regimens through direct and indirect comparison.

Results

Twenty-seven studies involving 1,660 patients were included. Pairwise and network meta-analyses found no significant difference in mortality among the groups. There are four studies that reported blood flow measurements of internal mammary artery grafts intraoperatively after dissecting or immediately after distal anastomosis while patients were on continuous intravenous infusion of diltiazem and nitroglycerin. Although insufficient for data synthesis, the measured results from all four studies suggest that both diltiazem and nitroglycerin significantly increased blood flow of arterial grafts compared to placebo. For other perioperative outcomes, compared to diltiazem, patients that received nitroglycerin had higher odds of postoperative atrial fibrillation (OR = 2.67, 95% CI: 1.15 to 6.24) and higher peak serum cardiac enzymes. Patients that received placebo had higher odds of atrial fibrillation (OR = 3.00, 95% CI: 1.18 to 7.63) and lower odds of requiring inotrope support (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.73) compared to diltiazem. Data from the network meta-analysis indicated that diltiazem had significantly lower odds of postoperative atrial fibrillation compared to nitroglycerin (OR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.85). In fact, the rank from highest to lowest rates of postoperative atrial fibrillation was placebo>nitroglycerin>diltiazem. The rank from highest to lowest odds of requiring inotropic support is nitroglycerin> diltiazem>placebo. However, placebo had significantly higher odds of postoperative myocardial infarction than diltiazem (OR = 4.51, 95% CI: 1.34 to 15.25). The rank from highest to lowest odds of postoperative myocardial infarction, transient cardiac ischemic event and atrial fibrillation is placebo>nitroglycerin>diltiazem.

Conclusion

Compared to nitroglycerin and placebo, perioperative continuous intravenous infusion of diltiazem had stronger protective effects against postoperative ischemic cardiac injuries and atrial fibrillation although patients may need more inotropic support. The increased blood flow from diltiazem use in arterial grafts may potentially contribute to the drug’s outcome benefits.