1
|
Duan Y, Hoben M, Song Y, Chamberlain SA, Iaconi A, Choroschun K, Shrestha S, Cummings GG, Norton PG, Estabrooks CA. Organizational Context and Quality Indicators in Nursing Homes: A Microsystem Look. J Appl Gerontol 2024; 43:13-25. [PMID: 37669619 PMCID: PMC10693724 DOI: 10.1177/07334648231200110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The association of organizational context with quality of care in nursing homes is not well understood at the clinical microsystem (care unit) level. This cross-sectional study examined the associations of unit-level context with 10 unit-level quality indicators derived from the Minimum Data Set 2.0. Study settings comprised 262 care units within 91 Canadian nursing homes. We assessed context using unit-aggregated care-aide-reported scores on the 10 scales of the Alberta Context Tool. Mixed-effects regression analysis showed that structural resources were negatively associated with antipsychotics use (B = -.06; p = .001) and worsened late-loss activities of daily living (B = -.03, p = .04). Organizational slack in time was negatively associated with worsened pain (B = -.04, p = .01). Social capital was positively associated with delirium symptoms (B = .12, p = .02) and worsened depressive symptoms (B = .10, p = .01). The findings suggested that targeting interventions to modifiable contextual elements and unit-level quality improvement will be promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinfei Duan
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Matthias Hoben
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yuting Song
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- School of Nursing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | | | - Alba Iaconi
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Peter G. Norton
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Doshi M, Lee L, Keddie M. Effective mouth care for older people living in nursing homes. Nurs Older People 2021; 33:18-23. [PMID: 33624462 DOI: 10.7748/nop.2021.e1320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Oral health for older people living in nursing homes has long been an area of interest and concern, with suboptimal oral health often having significant effects on their general health, well-being and quality of life. This article outlines the reasons why oral health can deteriorate in nursing home residents and the potential effects of this, and provides information about relevant national guidance. The article also details practical recommendations for nursing home staff on improving residents' oral hygiene, including undertaking oral health assessments, delivering mouth care and accessing dental services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mili Doshi
- East Surrey Hospital, Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Redhill, England
| | - Loraine Lee
- Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Redhill, England
| | - Meg Keddie
- Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Redhill, England
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gallant NL, Peckham A, Marchildon G, Hadjistavropoulos T, Roblin B, Stopyn RJN. Provincial legislative and regulatory standards for pain assessment and management in long-term care homes: a scoping review and in-depth case analysis. BMC Geriatr 2020; 20:458. [PMID: 33167897 PMCID: PMC7650170 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01758-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among Canadian residents living in long-term care (LTC) facilities, and especially among those with limited ability to communicate due to dementia, pain remains underassessed and undermanaged. Although evidence-based clinical guidelines for the assessment and management of pain exist, these clinical guidelines are not widely implemented in LTC facilities. A relatively unexplored avenue for change is the influence that statutes and regulations could exert on pain practices within LTC. This review is therefore aimed at identifying the current landscape of policy levers used across Canada to assess and manage pain among LTC residents and to evaluate the extent to which they are concordant with evidence-based clinical guidelines proposed by an international consensus group consisting of both geriatric pain and public policy experts. METHODS Using scoping review methodology, a search for peer-reviewed journal articles and government documents pertaining to pain in Canadian LTC facilities was carried out. This scoping review was complemented by an in-depth case analysis of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Ontario statutes and regulations. RESULTS Across provinces, pain was highly prevalent and was associated with adverse consequences among LTC residents. The considerable benefits of using a standardized pain assessment protocol, along with the barriers in implementing such a protocol, were identified. For most provinces, pain assessment and management in LTC residents was not specifically addressed in their statutes or regulations. In Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Ontario, regulations mandate the use of the interRAI suite of assessment tools for the assessment and reporting of pain. CONCLUSION The prevalence of pain and the benefits of implementing standardized pain assessment protocols has been reported in the research literature. Despite occasional references to pain, however, existing regulations do not recommend assessments of pain at the frequency specified by experts. Insufficient direction on the use of specialized pain assessment tools (especially in the case of those with limited ability to communicate) that minimize reliance on subjective judgements was also identified in current regulations. Existing policies therefore fail to adequately address the underassessment and undermanagement of pain in older adults residing in LTC facilities in ways that are aligned with expert consensus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha L. Gallant
- Department of Psychology and Center on Aging and Health, University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, Saskatchewan S4S 0A2 Canada
| | - Allie Peckham
- Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 550 N 3rd Street, Phoenix, AZ 85004 USA
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 425–155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M6 Canada
| | - Gregory Marchildon
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 425–155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M6 Canada
| | - Thomas Hadjistavropoulos
- Department of Psychology and Center on Aging and Health, University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, Saskatchewan S4S 0A2 Canada
| | - Blair Roblin
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 425–155 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M6 Canada
| | - Rhonda J. N. Stopyn
- Department of Psychology and Center on Aging and Health, University of Regina, 3737 Wascana Parkway, Regina, Saskatchewan S4S 0A2 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
MacEntee MI, Brondani M, Avivi-Arber L, Bartlett D, Donnelly L, Duyck J, Hori K, Karve A, Persson GR, Kettratad-Pruksapong M, Schimmel M, Hon-Ching So F, Thomson WM, Yoon MN, Wyatt C. Clinical Oral Disorders in Adults Screening Protocol (CODA-SP) from the 2019 Vancouver IADR Consensus Symposium. Gerodontology 2020; 38:5-16. [PMID: 33009707 DOI: 10.1111/ger.12496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Revised: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Clinical Oral Disorder in Elders (CODE) index was proposed in 1999 to assess the oral health status and treatment needs of older people who typically were edentate or had few natural teeth. Since then, more people are retaining natural teeth into old age and have oral disorders similar to younger adults. In addition, there has been further guidance on screening for disease that includes changes to the clinical indicators of several oral disorders and greater sensitivity to people's concerns about their oral health and care needs. METHODS Experts in dental geriatrics assembled at a satellite symposium of the International Association of Dental Research in June 2019 to revise the objectives and content of the CODE index. Before the symposium, 139 registrants were asked for comments on the CODE index, and 11 content experts summarised current evidence and assembled reference lists of relevant information on each indicator. The reference lists provided the base for a narrative review of relevant evidence supplemented by reference tracking and direct searches of selected literature for additional evidence. RESULTS Analysis of the evidence by consensus of the experts produced the Clinical Oral Disorders in Adults Screening Protocol (CODA-SP). CONCLUSIONS The CODA-SP encompasses multiple domains of physical and subjective indicators with weighted severity scores. Field tests are required now to validate its effectiveness and utility in oral healthcare services, outcomes and infrastructure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Avanti Karve
- University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Chris Wyatt
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Estabrooks CA, Straus SE, Flood CM, Keefe J, Armstrong P, Donner GJ, Boscart V, Ducharme F, Silvius JL, Wolfson MC. Restoring trust: COVID-19 and the future of long-term care in Canada. Facets (Ott) 2020. [DOI: 10.1139/facets-2020-0056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The Royal Society of Canada Task Force on COVID-19 was formed in April 2020 to provide evidence-informed perspectives on major societal challenges in response to and recovery from COVID-19. The Task Force established a series of working groups to rapidly develop policy briefings, with the objective of supporting policy makers with evidence to inform their decisions. This paper reports the findings of the COVID-19 Long-Term Care (LTC) working group addressing a preferred future for LTC in Canada, with a specific focus on COVID-19 and the LTC workforce. First, the report addresses the research context and policy environment in Canada’s LTC sector before COVID-19 and then summarizes the existing knowledge base for integrated solutions to challenges that exist in the LTC sector. Second, the report outlines vulnerabilities exposed because of COVID-19, including deficiencies in the LTC sector that contributed to the magnitude of the COVID-19 crisis. This section focuses especially on the characteristics of older adults living in nursing homes, their caregivers, and the physical environment of nursing homes as important contributors to the COVID-19 crisis. Finally, the report articulates principles for action and nine recommendations for action to help solve the workforce crisis in nursing homes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sharon E. Straus
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Janice Keefe
- Department of Family Studies and Gerontology, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Pat Armstrong
- Department of Sociology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gail J. Donner
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Véronique Boscart
- CIHR/Schlegel Industrial Research Chair for Colleges in Seniors Care, Conestoga College, Kitchener, ON, Canada
| | | | - James L. Silvius
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Michael C. Wolfson
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health and Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|