Prospective clinical trial evaluating vulnerability and chemotherapy risk using geriatric assessment tools in older patients with lung cancer

Frailty and Cancer Prognosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to summarize the current evidence regarding the prognostic role of frailty in older patients diagnosed with cancer and to explore the evidence regarding its prognostic implications in cancer survivors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Frailty has been consistently associated with mortality/overall survival, postoperative complications, short- and long-term postoperative mortality, length of stay, among other adverse health-related outcomes in several oncological contexts. The possible association between frailty and treatment toxicity has been less explored, however most studies suggest frailty is a predictor of treatment induced toxicity. In addition, in cancer survivors, frailty is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, incident type 2 diabetes mellitus, mortality, altered cognitive performance and increased symptom severity. Due to its usefulness in establishing prognosis and informing treatment decision making, it is expected that frailty screening and assessment will continue to gain popularity as part of the pretreatment evaluation of older patients with cancer.

Effectiveness and Feasibility of Home-Based Palliative Care Interventions for Geriatric Oncology Patients: A Systematic Review Using Narrative Synthesis

BACKGROUND

Due to an urgent need to develop palliative care services for geriatric patients with advanced cancer, an overview of available information regarding home-based palliative care interventions would be valuable.

AIM

To summarize current literature for interventions targeted to homebound, older patients with incurable cancer, and investigate whether these patients can be benefited from home-based palliative care and achieve improved outcomes.

DESIGN

A search strategy consisting of terms related to home care, palliation, oncology, and geriatrics was employed. A protocol following PRISMA guidelines was prospectively uploaded at PROSPERO (ID = CRD42023404675).

DATA SOURCES

Pubmed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov, and Epistemonikos.org databases were searched from inception until the present day. Eligibility criteria were selected based on the research question, the population of interest, and the research design. The Risk of Bias Assessment Tool version 2 (RoB-2) was used to appraise study quality.

RESULTS

A total of 10 articles including 871 patients (out of 1236 titles and 141 fully-reviewed texts) were selected. Four studies assessed exercise interventions, two evaluated multi-component home-care models, two focused on supervision services, and two had nutrition and activity components. Eight studies reported improved outcomes in either specified or mixed cancer geriatric populations.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a scarcity of clinical trials regarding home-based palliative care for geriatric oncology patients, resulting in poor information and a lack of evidence. At-home interventions seem feasible and have a positive effect on pain management and functional status, but more high-quality studies are required.

Preoperative frailty screening in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer surgery: an essential step for a good surgical outcome

INTRODUCTION

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a disease commonly diagnosed in the elderly, often in advanced stages. However, elderly patients with lung cancer can benefit from surgery, provided that postoperative risks are assessed appropriately before surgery. Frailty is a measure of age-related impaired functional status and a predictor of mortality and morbidity. However, its importance as a preoperative marker is not well defined.

AREAS COVERED

This systematic review discusses the importance of preoperative frailty screening in elderly patients with NSCLC. A literature search was performed on the MEDLINE database in June 2023, and relevant studies on frailty or preoperative assessment of NSCLC which were published between 2000 and 2023 were retained and discussed in this review.

EXPERT OPINION

Among the types of existing methods used to assess frailty those on the geriatric assessment seem to be the most appropriate; however, they are unable to fully capture the 'surgical' frailty; thus, other instruments should be developed and validated in NSCLC.

Factors associated with maintaining walking ability postoperation for hip fractures and the predictive value of the CGA7 score for postoperative walking ability

AIM

Patients with hip fractures have a high rate of mortality or decreased mobility, despite early operative treatment and rehabilitation. The first aim of this study was to investigate the factors of decreased walking ability after hip fracture based on whether walking ability was or was not maintained postoperatively. The second aim was to examine the usefulness of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment 7 (CGA7), modified from the conventional Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, for predicting postoperative walking ability.

METHODS

This study included patients who were treated surgically for hip fractures. We divided patients by whether they did or did not maintain their walking ability postoperatively. We registered the following demographic data: walking ability preadmission and at discharge, CGA7 score, cognitive impairment, the patient's prefracture status, fracture type, surgical waiting time, hospital stay duration, limitation of weight-bearing, postoperative complications, transfer to rehabilitation hospital, final living place, and follow-up period. The characteristics of the two groups were compared using Wilcoxon's rank-sum test, the chi-squared test, or Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Among 855 patients, 616 (73.0%) patients maintained walking ability and 239 (27.0%) patients did not. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that the factors of age, sex, preoperative walking ability, and postoperative complications were significantly associated with maintaining postoperative walking ability. Furthermore, the higher the CGA7 score, the more likely were patients to maintain their walking ability (odds ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.85; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who had a low CGA7 score had the potential risk of decreased walking ability. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2023; 23: 830-835.

NAVIGATE: improving survival in vulnerable patients with lung cancer through nurse navigation, symptom monitoring and exercise - study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Low socioeconomic position (SEP) has been shown to be strongly associated with impaired lung cancer survival. Barriers related to receiving recommended treatment among patients with lung cancer with low SEP may include adverse health behaviour and limited physical and psychosocial resources influencing the ability to react on high-risk symptoms and to navigate the healthcare system. To address the underlying factors that drive both decisions of treatment, adherence to treatment and follow-up in vulnerable patients with lung cancer, we developed the Navigate intervention. The aim of this randomised controlled trial is to investigate the effect of the intervention on survival (primary outcome), lung cancer treatment adherence, health-related quality of life and other psychosocial outcomes as well as health costs and process evaluation (secondary outcomes) in a study population of vulnerable patients with lung cancer.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This two-armed multicentre randomised trial will recruit patients from five lung cancer clinics in Denmark identified as vulnerable according to a screening instrument with nine clinical and patient-reported vulnerability criteria developed for the study. We will enrol 518 vulnerable patients >18 years old diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer at all stages with a performance status <2. Participants will be randomly allocated to either standard treatment and intervention or standard treatment alone. The Navigate intervention is based on principles from motivational interviewing and includes three components of nurse navigation, systematic monitoring of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and physical exercise in a person-centred delivery model. Data will be collected at baseline and 3, 6, 12 months after randomisation using questionnaires, clinical data and physical function tests.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics Committee, Region Zealand (SJ-884/EMN-2020-37380) and the Data Protection Agency in Region Zealand (REG-080-2021) approved the trial. Participants will provide written informed consent. Results will be reported in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05053997.

The impact of frailty on health outcomes in older adults with lung cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Frailty is prevalent in older adults with lung cancer, however the impact of frailty in this population is not well understood. The aim of this review was to evaluate the outcomes that are measured in frail older adults with lung cancer, and to determine the associations between frailty and these outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic online search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was conducted to identify all English-language studies between January 2015 and May 2022 prospectively evaluating frailty and outcomes in older adults (median age > 65 years) with lung cancer. Studies were excluded if frailty was defined by a single domain assessment or not clearly defined. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

Of 1891 studies screened, 16 met inclusion criteria. The median number of patients was 96 (range 26-494) and the mean age was 76.6 years. Eight different frailty assessments were used, and frailty definitions varied widely. The most frequently assessed outcomes were overall survival (n = 13,81%), treatment-related toxicity (n = 8,50%), hospitalisation (n = 5,31%), and treatment completion/discontinuation (n = 4,25%). Quality of life (n = 3,19%), function (n = 1,6%), frailty trajectory (n = 1,6%), and emergency visits (n = 1,6%) were infrequently assessed. Frailty had a strong and consistent association with mortality (Hazard Ratio range: 3.5-11.91). It was also associated with treatment-related toxicity and treatment selection. The remaining outcomes were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

These data support frailty as an important predictor of mortality in older adults with lung cancer, however further research is warranted to determine the association between frailty and other meaningful endpoints for this vulnerable population.

Frailty in Patients With Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies regarding the prevalence of frailty in patients with lung cancer and mortality in frail patients with lung cancer are inconsistent and require clarification.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the prevalence and impact of frailty in patients with lung cancer?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis used a combination of free-text terms and medical subject headings terms, according to the database requirements in MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library from inception until November 15, 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 2,571 articles were identified, and 16 articles involving 4,183 patients were included for study. The prevalence of frailty in lung cancer was 45% (95% CI, 28-61; I² = 99.5%; P < .0001). In patients with lung cancer, frailty was associated with an increased hazard ratio for mortality (hazard ratio, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.77-5.10; P < .001).

INTERPRETATION

The prevalence of frailty in lung cancer is 45%, which has a significant negative impact on survival of patients with lung cancer. These results highlight the importance of measuring frailty, which provides important prognostic information, and may provide opportunities for interventions to improve outcomes in patients with lung cancer.

Experiences and views of nurses about unmet needs of older cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

The aim is to understand the experiences and views of oncology nurses about the unmet care needs of older cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Nurses play the key role in evaluating and determining the needs of this special group.

METHOD

A phenomenological descriptive qualitative study with convenience sampling was used. Participants were referred by the Turkish Oncology Nursing Society. The study participants were 12 nurses aged 34-53 years, with oncology experience between 5 and 27 years. The data were collected using semi-structured face-to-face interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim with concurrent analyses and data collection. Thematic content analysis was used to determine common domains.

RESULTS

The study data were categorized into 3 contexts, 12 themes, and 37 subthemes. The first context, "unmet needs", includes physical care, psychological care, and social care themes. The second context, "barriers to meeting those needs", comprises the theme of patient characteristics, attitude of family, attitude of the nurses/healthcare team, health system, and culture. The last context is "suggestions for meeting needs". Nurses play an important role in identifying and meeting unmet psychosocial needs.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

The study indicated that older cancer patients had problems in identifying, expressing, and making demands for their needs and that their culture contributed to this situation. Nurses serving in the outpatient chemotherapy units should conduct a holistic assessment of older cancer patients, be aware that these patients may not be able to express their needs, be more sensitive toward them, and ensure that the voice of the older patients is heard.

Impacts of Frailty on Prognosis in Lung Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Frailty is a common geriatric syndrome and is described as a limited ability to compensate and recover from stressors. Lung cancer is largely diagnosed in old age, when frailty is common and might have predictive value on prognosis. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to evaluate the prognostic role of frailty in lung cancer.

Methods: The online PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI and Wanfang literature databases were searched to identify all related articles that reported the predictive value of frailty for mortality and therapeutic toxicity. Review Manager 5.3 was used to analyze results by standard meta-analysis methodology.

Results: Seven studies were included in this review, and only six studies with 2,359 patients were enrolled in meta-analysis. Patients in two studies received chemotherapy, two studies radiotherapy, two studies surgery, one study not reported. Compared to non-frail patients, frail patients had a higher risk of overall mortality [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.32–1.87], and therapeutic toxicity [Odds Ratio (OR) = 2.60, 95% CI, 0.82–8.24]. Prefrail patients also showed higher overall mortality and therapeutic toxicity than non-frail patients (HR = 1.20, 95% CI, 1.05–1.38; OR = 1.72, 95% CI, 1.18–2.51, respectively).

Conclusions: Frailty is a powerful predictor of overall mortality and therapeutic toxicity in lung cancer patients.

Age-Based Comparison of Hematological Toxicity in Patients with Lung Cancer

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Because of the increasing age of the general population, there is an increasing number of older patients with lung cancer. Cancer chemotherapy often causes severe hematological toxicity in older patients. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study aimed to explore the risk factors affecting the hematological toxicity of cytotoxic anticancer drugs in patients with lung cancer. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Data were retrospectively collected from 194 patients with lung cancer at Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Japan, between April 2011 and March 2016, when the patients underwent their first round of cytotoxic chemotherapy. The patients were divided into three groups on the basis of age: &#x3c;65, 65–74, and ≥75 years. Physiological functions and laboratory data before treatment, as well as hematological adverse events following chemotherapy, were compared among the groups. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Patients aged ≥75 years were significantly more likely to experience grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, compared with patients aged &#x3c;65 years. However, there were no differences in the incidence of anemia or thrombocytopenia among the age groups. The frequency of febrile neutropenia tended to increase with age. Multivariate analysis showed that age ≥75 years, male sex, and a performance status of ≥2 were independent factors for grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. Patients with 2 or 3 of these factors had a significantly higher frequency of neutropenia, compared with patients who had 0 or 1 of these factors. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> We found that age ≥75 years, male sex, and a performance status of ≥2 were independent risk factors for grade 3 or 4 neutropenia.

Prospective clinical trial evaluating vulnerability and chemotherapy risk using geriatric assessment tools in older patients with lung cancer

AIM

In Japan, the number of older patients with cancer has been increasing. Assessment of performance status, cognitive function and social background is necessary for the treatment of older patients. The aims of the present study were: (i) to establish an evaluation system using electronic medical records; and (ii) to distinguish older patients as fit versus vulnerable or frail according to a geriatric assessment (GA) system score.

METHODS

We incorporated GA tools in our electronic medical records system and carried out comprehensive assessments for patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer aged ≥65 years. The decision about primary treatment followed consultation with the clinical team and was not guided by GA scores. Subsequent treatment and outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients had completed GA. The average age was 75 years (range 65-94 years). Regarding GA results, 63% were positive on the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment 7, 39% on the Vulnerable Elderly Survey-13 and 84% on the Geriatric 8. The percentage of vulnerable patients (positive on all three GA) was significantly higher in the non-standard therapy group (n = 19) than in the standard therapy group (n = 81; 78.9% vs 21.0%, P < 0.001). Among vulnerable patients who received standard therapy, 47% discontinued chemotherapy as a result of toxicity. Even if a patient was considered vulnerable based on GA scores, chemotherapy is possibly safe for those with EGFR mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirmed the feasibility of this system. During decision-making for older patients with cancer, a combination of GA helps prevent undertreatment or overtreatment. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 1108-1111.