Anillin-related protein Mid1 regulates timely formation of the contractile ring in the fission yeastSchizosaccharomyces japonicus

Identification of a new p53 responsive element in the promoter region of anillin

The expression of anillin mRNA and protein is regulated in a cell cycle‑dependent manner. However, the mechanism underlying this process is unclear. Previous studies analyzing the sequence of the 5'‑untranslated region of anillin have unveiled several putative p53 binding sites. Therefore, the present study hypothesized that the anillin gene may be repressed by p53 and that the commonly observed mutation (or loss of function) of p53 may serve a role in this phenotype. Bioinformatic analysis of the anillin promoter region revealed potential p53 responsive elements. Of those identified, 2 were able to bind p53 protein, as determined via a chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. Although it was hypothesized that DNA damage and resultant p53 expression would repress anillin expression, the results revealed that anillin mRNA and protein expression levels were negatively regulated by DNA damage in the wild‑type p53 cells, but not in the isogenic p53 null cells. Furthermore, DNA sequences encompassing the p53 binding site downregulated luciferase transgenes in a p53 dependent manner. Taken together, these data indicated that anillin was negatively regulated by p53 and that anillin overexpression observed in cancer may be a p53‑mediated phenomenon. The data from the present study provided further evidence for the role of p53 in the biologically crucial process of cytokinesis.

Regulation and Assembly of Actomyosin Contractile Rings in Cytokinesis and Cell Repair

Cytokinesis and single-cell wound repair both involve contractile assemblies of filamentous actin (F-actin) and myosin II organized into characteristic ring-like arrays. The assembly of these actomyosin contractile rings (CRs) is specified spatially and temporally by small Rho GTPases, which trigger local actin polymerization and myosin II contractility via a variety of downstream effectors. We now have a much clearer view of the Rho GTPase signaling cascade that leads to the formation of CRs, but some factors involved in CR positioning, assembly, and function remain poorly understood. Recent studies show that this regulation is multifactorial and goes beyond the long-established Ca²⁺ -dependent processes. There is substantial evidence that the Ca²⁺ -independent changes in cell shape, tension, and plasma membrane composition that characterize cytokinesis and single-cell wound repair also regulate CR formation. Elucidating the regulation and mechanistic properties of CRs is important to our understanding of basic cell biology and holds potential for therapeutic applications in human disease. In this review, we present a primer on the factors influencing and regulating CR positioning, assembly, and contraction as they occur in a variety of cytokinetic and single-cell wound repair models. Anat Rec, 301:2051-2066, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.