1
|
MacCallum-Bridges CL, Admon LK, Daw JR. Childcare disruptions and maternal health during the COVID-19 pandemic. HEALTH AFFAIRS SCHOLAR 2024; 2:qxae061. [PMID: 38774574 PMCID: PMC11108245 DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxae061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024]
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, nearly all US states enacted stay-at-home orders, upending usual childcare arrangements and providing a unique opportunity to study the association between childcare disruptions and maternal health. Using data from the 2021-2022 National Survey of Children's Health, we estimated the association between childcare disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic and self-reported mental and physical health among female parents of young children (ages 0-5 years). Further, we assessed racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in (1) the prevalence of childcare disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic and (2) the association between childcare disruptions and mental or physical health. Female parents who experienced childcare disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic were less likely to report excellent or very good mental (-7.4 percentage points) or physical (-2.5 percentage points) health. Further, childcare disruptions were more common among parents with greater socioeconomic privilege (ie, higher education, higher income), but may have been more detrimental to health among parents with less socioeconomic privilege (eg, lower education, lower income, and single parents). As state and federal policymakers take action to address the maternal health crisis in the United States, our findings suggest that measures to improve childcare stability may also promote maternal health and health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lindsay K Admon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
| | - Jamie R Daw
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY 10032, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Horwood G, Augoustinos M, Due C. "I *know* all the things I should be doing …": accounting for mental health and illness in an online mental health discussion forum during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Psychol 2023; 11:370. [PMID: 37932851 PMCID: PMC10626693 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-023-01424-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mental health is highly correlated with a person's social and economic circumstances, and the recent COVID-19 pandemic made this connection uniquely visible. Yet a discourse of personal responsibility for mental health often dominates in mental health promotion campaigns, media coverage and lay understandings, contributing to the stigmatisation of mental ill-health. METHODS In this study, we analysed how the concept of 'mental health' was discursively constructed in an online mental health peer-support forum in Australia during 2020, the period of the first two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. An approach informed by Critical Discursive Psychology was employed to analyse all posts made to a discussion thread entitled "Coping during the coronavirus outbreak" in 2020, a total of 1,687 posts. RESULTS Two main interpretative repertoires concerning mental health were identified. Under the first repertoire, mental health was understood as resulting largely from the regular performance of a suite of self-care behaviours. Under the second repertoire, mental health was understood as resulting largely from external circumstances outside of the individual's control. The existence of two different repertoires of mental health created an ideological dilemma which posters negotiated when reporting mental ill-health. A recurring pattern of accounting for mental ill-health was noted in which posters employed a three-part concessive structure to concede Repertoire 1 amid assertions of Repertoire 2; and used disclaimers, justifications, and excuses to avoid negative typification of their identity as ignorant or irresponsible. CONCLUSIONS Mental ill-health was commonly oriented to by forum posters as an accountable or morally untoward state, indicating the societal pervasiveness of a discourse of personal responsibility for mental health. Such discourses are likely to contribute to the stigmatisation of those suffering from mental ill-health. There is a need therefore for future communications about mental health to be framed in a way that increases awareness of social determinants, as well as for policy responses to effect material change to social determinants of mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Horwood
- School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.
| | - Martha Augoustinos
- School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia
| | - Clemence Due
- School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bangham C, Zack RM, Nelson E, Liu X, Codner A, Hicks JM, Greece JA. Assessing the effect of adverse economic events on severity of hunger among food pantry clients. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1286094. [PMID: 38026276 PMCID: PMC10644360 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1286094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
This study assessed relationship between adverse economic events (AEE) and hunger level (i.e., little to no, moderate, severe). A cross-sectional survey was conducted from June to August 2018 in 10 food pantries with 616 food pantry users. Hunger level was assessed by the Household Hunger Scale. AEE were evaluated over the past 3 months. Participants (60.55%) experienced unexpected or increased medical expenses (17.69%), job loss (13.64%), pay reduction (11.85%), and death of a family member (9.09%). Pay reduction (OR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.12, 3.14) and increased debt (OR = 2.71, 95% CI: 1.92, 3.84) were associated with moderate hunger; death of a family member (OR = 2.43, 95% CI: 1.21, 4.90), pay reduction (OR = 2.95, 95% CI: 1.24, 7.04), and increased debt (OR = 3.46, 95% CI: 1.98, 6.04) were associated with severe hunger. Awareness of AEE can inform public health programs and policies for people in need of additional resources, which is essential in times of increased economic instability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Candice Bangham
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Rachel M. Zack
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States
| | - Eva Nelson
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Xinyang Liu
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Alyson Codner
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jacqueline Milton Hicks
- Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jacey A. Greece
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
The Relationship between Daily Behavior Changes and Vaccine Attitudes at the Early Stage of the COVID-19 Pandemic among Japanese People from Different Demographics: A Retrospective and Exploratory Examination Using a Free-Response Survey. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11010192. [PMID: 36680036 PMCID: PMC9862657 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11010192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
This study investigated how daily behaviors of Japanese people changed during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic and whether the change was mediated by demographics. It also examined whether the magnitude of behavior change in a demographic group is related to their attitudes towards the COVID-19 vaccine. 301 Japanese responded to an online survey in February 2021, in which they first wrote some activities they frequently performed before the virus outbreak and then wrote about activities in their current life. The number of gathered answers were 1858 for 'before' and 1668 for 'after', and they were grouped into 19 behavior categories. Overall, behaviors such as traveling, eating out, and shopping were much less frequently described in the 'after' condition; while housework, food delivery, and pandemic prevention were mentioned more. However, the change pattern was significantly influenced by demographics of age, gender, having children or not, and household income. Especially women, younger generations, and people without children showed the greatest extent of behavior change compared with the other demographic cohorts. These groups were reported to be vaccine-hesitant in the literature. This study suggests that individuals with hesitant attitudes towards vaccines are more willing to change their behaviors to control viral transmission.
Collapse
|
5
|
Aslam A, Adams TL. "The workload is staggering": Changing working conditions of stay-at-home mothers under COVID-19 lockdowns. GENDER WORK AND ORGANIZATION 2022; 29:GWAO12870. [PMID: 35942419 PMCID: PMC9347922 DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has drawn attention to the home as a work environment, but the focus has centered on the experiences of paid workers. Stay-at-home mothers (SAHMs), for whom the home was already a workplace, have received little attention. This article explores how pandemic-induced lockdowns impacted SAHMs' working conditions and their experiences of childrearing. Combining a Marxist-feminist conceptualization of domestic labor with a labor process framework, we performed a qualitative content analysis of vignettes SAHMs shared about their day-to-day domestic labor in an online mothering community. Our findings show that, under lockdown conditions, the primacy given to partners' paid work combined with children's increased demands for care and attention reduced SAHMs work autonomy and exacerbated gender inequalities in the home. Combining labor process theory with literature on motherwork illuminates the home as a gendered work environment and enhances understanding of how changing conditions of domestic labor can intensify gender inequalities (and workers' awareness of them) that typically remain "hidden in the household."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Awish Aslam
- Department of SociologyWestern UniversityLondonOntarioCanada
| | - Tracey L. Adams
- Department of SociologyWestern UniversityLondonOntarioCanada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cummins MW, Brannon GE. Mothering in a Pandemic: Navigating Care Work, Intensive Motherhood, and COVID-19. GENDER ISSUES 2022; 39:123-141. [PMID: 35261538 PMCID: PMC8893238 DOI: 10.1007/s12147-022-09295-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Even before COVID-19, women around the world performed more unpaid domestic labor, specifically unpaid care labor, than men. COVID-19 has only exacerbated the gender gap in this domestic labor. For Western women, especially mothers in the United States of America, the normative discourse of intensive motherhood and the gendered pressure inherent in the unrealistic standards set by the discourse have only increased the amount of unpaid domestic and care labor required of mothers. Using qualitative, in-depth interviews with 18 mothers during May-June 2020, this study examines privileged mothers' perceptions of what they did well in parenting both before and during the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic. The mothers' pragmatic adaptations during the pandemic posed challenges to the norms of intensive motherhood, as did emergent ideas about integrative mothering articulated before the pandemic's onset. We find that while COVID-19 has increased expectations on mothers, it has also provided a turning point wherein expectations can be changed, as the participants suggested. Implications for intensive motherhood scholars, mothers, and communication researchers are discussed, along with future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly Wiant Cummins
- Department of Communication, University of Texas Arlington, Arlington, TX USA
| | - Grace Ellen Brannon
- Department of Communication, University of Texas Arlington, Arlington, TX USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wandschneider L, Batram-Zantvoort S, Alaze A, Niehues V, Spallek J, Razum O, Miani C. Self-reported mental well-being of mothers with young children during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: A mixed-methods study. WOMEN'S HEALTH (LONDON, ENGLAND) 2022; 18:17455057221114274. [PMID: 35997231 PMCID: PMC9424892 DOI: 10.1177/17455057221114274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Mothers of young children have been identified as a particularly vulnerable group during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to explore how occupational, psychosocial and partnership-related factors were associated with their self-reported mental well-being during the first COVID-19 wave. METHODS Five hundred fifty participants of the BaBi cohort study (est. 2013, Bielefeld, North-Rhine Westphalia, Germany) were invited to complete an online survey and to take part in email interviews (April-May 2020). With survey data, we assessed self-reported mental well-being through validated instruments (eight-item Patient Health Questionnaire; short version of the Symptom Checklist) and ran linear regression models for occupational, psychosocial and partnership-related factors. We performed content analysis on the interviews' data to further understand the determinants of the women's mental well-being. RESULTS One hundred twenty-four women participated in the survey; of which 17 also participated in the interviews. A perceived lack of support in childcare was associated with higher levels of depressive symptoms, while having a higher internal locus of control was associated with lower levels. Psychological distress was higher in those reporting lack of emotional or childcare support. Interviews confirmed the interplay of potential stressors and highlighted the difficulties to reconcile different expectations of motherhood. DISCUSSION Occupational, psychosocial and partner-related factors can act (to varying degree) both as resources and stressors to the self-reported mental well-being of mothers of young children. These impacts took different forms and created opportunities or challenges, depending on specific life circumstances, such as work or family situations, relationships and own psychosocial resources. Although not representative, our study contributes to building the COVID-19 evidence base, delineating the mental health toll of the pandemic on mothers of young children and the factors that contribute to it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Wandschneider
- Department of Epidemiology and
International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University,
Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Stephanie Batram-Zantvoort
- Department of Epidemiology and
International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University,
Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Anita Alaze
- Department of Epidemiology and
International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University,
Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Vera Niehues
- Department of Epidemiology and
International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University,
Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Jacob Spallek
- Department of Public Health, Institute
for Health, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg,
Germany
| | - Oliver Razum
- Department of Epidemiology and
International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University,
Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Céline Miani
- Department of Epidemiology and
International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University,
Bielefeld, Germany
- Céline Miani, Department of Epidemiology
and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University,
Universitaetsstr. 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|