A comparative evaluation of a new automated assay for von Willebrand factor activity

Analytical and Clinical Validation of a Non-Ristocetin Based VWF Assay on 2 Automated Analyzers in a Large Reference Laboratory

BACKGROUND

Historically, von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity assays utilized ristocetin despite limitations including poor limits of detection and high imprecision. Newer VWF activity assays such as the INNOVANCE® VWF Ac assay, however, do not rely on ristocetin to measure platelet-dependent VWF function. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of the Siemens Healthineers INNOVANCE VWF Ac Assay on the Siemens BCS® XP and the Sysmex® CS-2500 systems in a large reference laboratory setting.

METHODS

Performance indicators for the INNOVANCE VWF Ac assay were the limit of quantitation (LoQ), precision, and method comparison. Method comparison studies were performed using remnant plasma patient samples from routine coagulation tests and analyzed using both the INNOVANCE VWF Ac assay and the Siemens Healthineers ristocetin-dependent BC von Willebrand Reagent.

RESULTS

Evaluation of the INNOVANCE VWF Ac assay on the BCS® XP and CS-2500 systems demonstrated good precision and a lower LoQ compared to the BC von Willebrand Reagent. Method comparisons support the use of the INNOVANCE VWF Ac assay on the BCS® XP and CS-2500 systems to measure platelet-dependent VWF function. The INNOVANCE VWF Ac assay was able to further assist in von Willebrand disease classification in 6/7 (86%) samples when the result was below the LoQ for the BC von Willebrand Reagent (ristocetin cofactor activity).

CONCLUSIONS

These data are consistent with the 2021 American Society of Hematology/International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis/National Hemophilia Foundation/World Federation of Hemophilia von Willebrand disease guidelines that suggest using newer assays such as the INNOVANCE VWF Ac assay in place of ristocetin cofactor activity assays.

Current Diagnosis of von Willebrand Disease in Italy: 3 Years Following the Release of the International Guidelines

The American Society of Hematology-International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis-National Hemophilia Foundation-World Federation of Hemophilia 2021 International Guidelines (IGL) on von Willebrand disease (VWD) have pointed out many challenges, mainly in the diagnostic approach of VWD patients. To determine the impact of these IGL on the current clinical and laboratory diagnosis of Italian VWD patients, we have recently conducted a survey among 43 centers affiliated with the Italian Association of Hemophilia Centers (AICE). Directors and colleagues responsible for the management of VWD patients were invited to report in a detailed questionnaire how IGL recommendations about the assessment of the specific activities of von Willebrand Factor (VWF) could be applied at their local sites. Results from such a survey showed that bleeding assessment tools, VWF antigen, and factor VIII procoagulant are currently in use in all centers. The automated assays for platelet-dependent VWF activity with or without ristocetin described in IGL have been used since 2021 in 37/43 (86%) centers. Among other laboratory tests, VWF collagen binding, ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination, multimeric analysis, VWF propeptide, VWF:FVIII binding assay were available in 49, 63, 26, 7, and 28% of AICE, respectively. Analyses of VWF gene defects are available only at 3/43 (7%) centers. Desmopressin (DDAVP) infusion trials at diagnosis, with measurements of VWF activities at 1 and 4 hours post-DDAVP, is currently performed at 38/43 (88%) centers. Based on this information, a simplified clinical diagnosis using a few automated tests before and after DDAVP has been proposed. Such a diagnostic approach will be validated prospectively in a large cohort of Italian VWD patients.

In vitro field study and worldwide survey assessing how clinical haemostasis laboratories analyse recombinant and plasma-derived von Willebrand factor products

INTRODUCTION

Several well-established clinical laboratory methods are available to measure von Willebrand factor (VWF) in plasma samples, but few data are available on their use for analysing recombinant VWF (rVWF).

AIM

To evaluate how clinical diagnostic laboratories analyse rVWF and plasma-derived VWF (pdVWF) spiked in vitro into VWF-deficient plasma using quantitative protein and functional assays of VWF.

METHODS

Human VWF-deficient plasma samples were spiked with rVWF (vonicog alfa; Takeda) or pdVWF/factor VIII (pdVWF/FVIII; antihemophilic factor/VWF complex [human], CSL Behring), each at final concentrations of 1.0, 0.6, 0.2, 0.1 IU/mL VWF:ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) according to labelled VWF activity. The ISTH SSC secondary coagulation standard was used as a control. Participating laboratories received three sets of these blinded aliquots. Mean results per assay were compared with the expected potency based on the labelled VWF:RCo activity.

RESULTS

Among 39 laboratories, the most commonly established assay was VWF:RCo; 22 laboratories reported data from 2214 tests. Despite a trend to lower values, VWF:RCo activities for rVWF were in agreement with target concentrations (71%-109%), whereas VWF:platelet glycoprotein Ib (VWF:GpIb) and VWF collagen-binding activity (VWF:CB) assays gave high recoveries (up to 132% and 127%, respectively). In contrast, pdVWF/FVIII was substantially underestimated by VWF:GpIb and VWF:CB assays (56%-86% recoveries), whereas the VWF:RCo assay gave recoveries of 47%-112% for pdVWF/FVIII.

CONCLUSION

The results of VWF assays used in clinical laboratories differ between rVWF and pdVWF, particularly for VWF:GpIb and VWF:CB assays. These differences may arise from the higher multimeric structure of rVWF compared to pdVWF.

von Willebrand factor propeptide variants lead to impaired storage and ER retention in patient-derived endothelial colony-forming cells

BACKGROUND

von Willebrand factor (VWF) is synthesized by vascular endothelial cells and megakaryocytes. The VWF propeptide is critical for multimerization and acts as an intra-molecular chaperone for mature VWF in sorting to its storage organelles, Weibel-Palade bodies (WPBs). In the Canadian Type 3 VWD study, almost half of the identified variants were in the VWF propeptide and these were associated with an increased bleeding phenotype.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate VWF propeptide variants that cause quantitative von Willebrand disease (VWD) by utilizing patient-derived endothelial colony-forming cells (ECFCs).

PATIENTS/METHODS

Endothelial colony-forming cells were isolated from five Type 3 VWD patients from four families with the following variants: (1) homozygous p.Asp75_Gly178del (deletion of exons 4 and 5 deletion; Ex4-5del), (2) homozygous p.Cys633Arg, (3) homozygous p.Arg273Trp, and (4) p.Pro293Glnfs*164 and p.Gln419* inherited in the compound heterozygous state. Additionally, ECFCs were isolated from six family members (two Type 1 VWD, four unaffected).

RESULTS

Endothelial colony-forming cells from the Type 3 patient with the compound heterozygous genotype exhibited a true null VWF cellular phenotype, with negligible VWF detected. In contrast, the other three propeptide variants presented a similar expression pattern in homozygous ECFCs where VWF was synthesized but not packaged in WPBs, and variant VWF had an increased association with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) marker, protein disulfide-isomerase (PDI), indicating an ER-retention phenotype. The biosynthetic phenotype was similar but to a lesser degree in heterozygous ECFCs expressing the non-null variants.

CONCLUSION

This study further elucidates the importance of the VWF propeptide in the VWD phenotype using patient-derived cells.

HemosIL VWF:GPIbR assay has a greater sensitivity than VWF:RCo technique to detect acquired von Willebrand syndrome in myeloproliferative neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) is frequent in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). For VWF functional evaluation, ristocetin cofactor activity by aggregometry (VWF: RCo) is considered the gold standard but have limitations, and automated activities measurement has been developed such as the HemosIl VWF:RCo Werfen® with particle agglutination (VWF:GPIbR).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of VWF:GPIbR with HemosIL VWF:RCo Werfen® (VWF:GPIbR) versus VWF:RCo in patients with thrombocytosis in the context of MPNs (T-MPNs) and in patients with secondary thrombocytosis (ST).

PATIENTS/METHODS

MPNs patients with thrombocytosis >450 G/L (T-MPNs) were compared to patients with secondary thrombocytosis (ST) due to inflammation or iron deficiency. VWF activity (VWF:Act) was analyzed using VWF:RCo or VWF:GPIbR. VWF analysis was completed by analysis of VWF multimers and VWF collagen binding (CB) assay (VWF:CB).

RESULTS

33 T-MPNs and 18 ST patients were included. Compared to aggregometry, evaluation of VWF:Act by VWF:GPIbR leaded to lower values in T-MPNs patients, but also in ST patients. Interestingly, whereas VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio did not reveal differences between T-MPNs and ST patients, VWF:GPIbR/VWF:Ag ratio analysis allowed to suspect AVWS only in T-MPNs patients. Using the distribution of VWF multimers analysis and VWF:CB, we here demonstrated that VWF:GPIbR allows AVWS diagnosis in 9 T-MPNs as opposed to aggregometry.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of VWF:Act using VWF:GPIbR has a greater sensitivity compared to aggregometry to detect AVWS in T-MPNs patients.

Von Willebrand factor assays in patients with acquired immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura treated with caplacizumab

Acquired immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis if undiagnosed. It is caused by autoantibody production to the von Willebrand factor (VWF) cleaving protease, A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13 (ADAMTS13). Caplacizumab, an immunoglobulin directed to the platelet glycoprotein Ibα receptor of VWF, has been reported to induce quicker resolution of iTTP compared to placebo. The laboratory measurement of VWF activity was significantly reduced in clinical trials of caplacizumab. Several VWF assays are available in the UK and this study investigated whether differences in VWF parameters were present in 11 patients diagnosed with iTTP and treated with daily caplacizumab. Chromogenic factor VIII activity, VWF antigen, collagen binding activity, VWF multimers and six VWF activity assays were measured prior to caplacizumab therapy and on several occasions during treatment. VWF antigen and collagen binding activity levels were normal or borderline normal in all patients. Ultra-large molecular weight multimers were present in all patients following treatment. VWF activity assays were normal or reduced during treatment, but this was reagent and patient dependant. In the unusual scenario of a caplacizumab-treated patient requiring measurement of VWF activity, it is important that laboratories understand how their local reagents perform as results cannot be predicted.

Shrinking Weibel-Palade bodies prevents high platelet recruitment in assays using thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura plasma

BACKGROUND

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), caused by a genetic or autoimmune-driven lack of ADAMTS-13 activity, leads to high levels of the ultra-large von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimers produced by endothelial cells, causing excess platelet recruitment into forming thrombi, often with mortal consequences. Treatments include plasma infusion or replacement to restore ADAMTS-13 activity, or prevention of platelet recruitment to VWF.

OBJECTIVES

We tested a different approach, exploiting the unique cell biology of the endothelium. Upon activation, the VWF released by exocytosis of Weibel-Palade bodies (WPBs), transiently anchored to the cell surface, unfurls as strings into flowing plasma, recruiting platelets. Using plasma from patients with TTP increases platelet recruitment to the surface of cultured endothelial cells under flow. WPBs are uniquely plastic, and shortening WPBs dramatically reduces VWF string lengths and the recruitment of platelets. We wished to test whether the TTP plasma-driven increase in platelet recruitment would be countered by reducing formation of the longest WPBs that release longer strings.

METHODS

Endothelial cells grown in flow chambers were treated with fluvastatin, one of 37 drugs shown to shorten WPBs, then activated under flow in the presence of platelets and plasma of either controls or patients with TTP.

RESULT

We found that the dramatic increase in platelet recruitment caused by TTP plasma is entirely countered by treatment with fluvastatin, shortening the WPBs.

CONCLUSIONS

This potential approach of ameliorating the endothelial contribution to thrombotic risk by intervening far upstream of hemostasis might prove a useful adjunct to more conventional and direct therapies.

Evaluating errors in the laboratory identification of von Willebrand disease using contemporary von Willebrand factor assays

von Willebrand disease (VWD) arises from deficiency and/or defects of von Willebrand factor (VWF). Assessment requires test panels, including VWF activity and antigen. Appropriate diagnosis including differential identification of qualitative versus quantitative defects remains problematic but has important management implications. Data using a large set (n=27) of varied plasma samples comprising both quantitative VWF deficiency ('Type 1 and 3') vs qualitative defects ('Type 2') tested in a cross-laboratory setting have been evaluated to assess contemporary VWF assays for utility to differentially identify sample types. Different VWF assays and activity/antigen ratios showed different utility in VWD and type identification. Identification errors were linked to assay limitations, including variability, and laboratory issues (e.g., test result misinterpretation). Quantitative deficient (type 1) samples were misinterpreted as qualitative defects (type 2) on 35/467 occasions (7.5% error rate); 11.4% of these errors were due to laboratories misinterpreting their own data, which was instead consistent with quantitative deficiencies. Conversely, qualitative defects were misinterpreted as quantitative deficiencies at a higher error rate (14.3%), but this was more often due to laboratories misinterpreting their data (40% of errors). For test-associated errors, VWF:RCo and VWF:GPIbM were associated with the highest variability and error rate, which was many-fold higher than that using VWF:CB. Chemiluminescence ('CLIA') procedures were associated with lowest inter-laboratory variability and errors overall. These findings in part explain the high rate of errors associated with VWD diagnosis. VWF:GPIbM showed a surprisingly high rate of test associated errors, whilst CLIA procedures performed best overall.

Assessing thrombogenesis and treatment response in congenital thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Despite clinical remission and normal platelet counts, congenital TTP (cTTP) is associated with non-overt symptoms. Prophylactic ADAMTS13 replacement therapy such as plasma infusion (PI) prevents acute episodes and improves symptomatology. There is no current method to investigate disease severity or monitor the impact of treatment. We utilize a dynamic high shear flow assay to further understand disease pathophysiology and determine the impact of cTTP on symptomatology and therapy, despite normal platelet counts. Whole blood, under high shear, was run over collagen-coated channels, causing platelet adhesion to von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimers. The resulting surface coverage by platelet-VWF thrombus was assessed. The normal range was 6-39% in 50 controls. Twenty-two cTTP patients with normal platelet counts were evaluated. Median pre-treatment surface coverage was 89%, and PI reduced coverage to a median of 44% (p = 0.0005). Patients taking antiplatelets had further reduced coverage when combined with PI and improved non-overt symptoms such as headache, lethargy, and abdominal pain in 100% of patients compared to 74% with PI alone (p = 0.046). We use a dynamic assay to report increased in vitro platelet adhesion and aggregation and additionally demonstrate significantly decreased thrombi following PI, with levels in the normal range levels achieved in patients taking additional antiplatelet therapy.

Potential misdiagnosis of von Willebrand disease caused by insufficient mixing after thawing frozen plasma

INTRODUCTION

von Willebrand disease (vWD) is a common inherited bleeding disorder caused by a deficiency in von Willebrand factor (vWF), but many laboratories and clinicians continue to struggle with diagnosing or excluding vWD. Its diagnosis requires laboratory testing, which may be compromised by preanalytical events, including poor specimen quality. This study assessed 17 different preanalytical conditions as potential causes of vWD misdiagnosis.

METHODS

Specimens from healthy controls (N = 21) were obtained. vWF antigen and vWF activity were analyzed using a newly developed automatic coagulation analyzer according to various preanalytic conditions such as centrifugation conditions, storage room temperature before centrifugation, cold storage temperature after centrifugation, thawing conditions, and inadequate mixing of thawed citrated plasma following the recommendations of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) H21-A5 guidelines.

RESULTS

The only condition that was significantly different from the reference condition was lack of mixing after thawing frozen citrated plasma (vWF activity and antigen were reduced by 58.7% and 49.6%, respectively). Our study showed that mixing after thawing was more important than the chosen method of mixing.

CONCLUSION

Thawed plasma should be mixed because of the risk of misdiagnosing vWD. Further education regarding the importance of appropriate mixing is warranted to achieve results comparable to those of freshly centrifuged samples.

Comparison of von Willebrand factor platelet-binding activity assays: ELISA overreads type 2B with loss of HMW multimers

BACKGROUND

A number of new assays with different measuring principles are available to measure von Willebrand factor (VWF) glycoprotein Ib (GPIb)-binding activity, but little is known about how these assays might behave differently for subtypes of von Willebrand disease (VWD).

OBJECTIVES

The Comparison of Assays to Measure VWF Activity (COMPASS-VWF) study was designed to compare all available VWF GPIb-binding activity assays for VWF. We specifically searched for particular assay behavior differences.

PATIENTS/METHODS

To sort out random differences from systematic assay behavior deviations, all assays were performed in different laboratories on the same samples in a blinded fashion. Samples from 53 normal controls and 42 well-characterized VWD patients were reanalyzed in this study to dissect assay-specific discrepancies.

RESULTS

No assay behavior differences were found for 53 normal controls. For VWD patients, we found the following systematic assay behavior patterns: (a) All ELISA assays for VWF:GPIbR as well as VWF:GPIbM are insensitive to detect the low VWF activity of VWD type 2B patients with loss of high molecular weight multimers; (b) VWF:Ab assay reports higher activity for the p.V1665E mutation than all other assays; and (c) all ristocetin-based assays (including VWF:RCo using fixed platelets) but the AcuStar assay report discrepantly low VWF activity for the p.P1467S polymorphism. No systematic assay-specific difference was observed for either the particle agglutination VWF:GPIbM assay or the AcuStar assay using magnetic beads.

CONCLUSIONS

Different assay principles may lead to discrepant results for certain VWD types or mutations. Therefore, a more extensive study for a large number of patients is needed to better characterize the incidence and relevance of such assay-specific differences.

New developments in von Willebrand disease

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) constitutes the most common inherited human bleeding disorder. It is associated with a mucocutaneous bleeding phenotype that can significantly impact upon quality of life. Despite its prevalence and associated morbidity, the diagnosis and subclassification of VWD continue to pose significant clinical challenges. This is in part attributable to the fact that plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels vary over a wide range in the normal population, together with the multiple different physiological functions played by VWF in vivo. Over recent years, substantial progress has been achieved in elucidating the biological roles of VWF. Significant advances have also been made into defining the pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning both quantitative and qualitative VWD. In particular, several new laboratory assays have been developed that enable more precise assessment of specific aspects of VWF activity. In the present review, we discuss these recent developments in the field of VWD diagnosis, and consider how these advances can impact upon clinical diagnostic algorithms for use in routine clinical practice. In addition, we review some important recent advances pertaining to the various treatment options available for managing patients with VWD.

Pre-procedural abnormal function of von Willebrand Factor is predictive of bleeding after surgical but not transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Both transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) have been proven to effectively correct von Willebrand Factor (vWF) pathologies, however there is limited data simultaneously comparing outcomes of both approaches. We prospectively enrolled patients with severe aortic stenosis referred for TAVI (n = 52) or SAVR (n = 48). In each case, vWF antigen (vWF:Ag), vWF activity (vWF:Ac) and activity-to-antigen (vWF:Ac/Ag) ratio were assessed at baseline, 24 h and 72 h after procedure. VWF abnormalities were defined as reduced vWF:Ac/Ag ratio (< 0.8). Bleeding events in both arms were classified according to Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) definitions. Overall, there was no difference between patients referred for TAVI and SAVR in vWF:Ac (1.62 ± 0.52 vs 1.71 ± 0.64; p = 0.593), vWF:Ag (1.99 ± 0.81 vs 2.04 ± 0.81; p = 0.942) or vWF:Ac/Ag ratio (0.84 ± 0.16 vs 0.85 ± 0.12; p = 0.950). Pathological vWF:Ac/Ag ratio was found in 20 (38%) TAVI and 15 (31%) SAVR patients (p = 0.407). Normalization of vWF:Ac/Ag ratio at day 3 after procedure was achieved in 19 (95%) TAVI and 13 (87%) SAVR patients (p = 0.439). Similar prevalence of major or life-threatening bleedings (MLTB) after TAVI and SAVR in entire groups was observed (19% vs. 23%, p = 0.652). VWF abnormalities were associated with higher incidence of MLTB in SAVR (53% vs 9%, p < 0.001), but not TAVI (15% vs. 22%, p = 0.132). Accordingly, in receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis vWF:Ac/Ag ratio < 0.8 showed significant sensitivity and specificity for predicting MLTB in SAVR group (AUC 0.735, 95% CI 0.538–0.931, p = 0.019). We proved that abnormal function of vWF is corrected successfully after both TAVI and SAVR, but vWF abnormalities are predictive of MLTB only in surgical patients.

Patients with aortic stenosis have von Willebrand factor abnormalities and increased proliferation of endothelial colony forming cells

BACKGROUND

Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) can experience bleeding complications including gastrointestinal bleeding from angiodysplastic lesions due to acquired von Willebrand syndrome. Studies have pointed to a role for von Willebrand factor (VWF) in angiogenesis.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess VWF defects in AS patients over time and the impact on angiogenesis using patient-derived endothelial colony-forming cells (ECFCs).

PATIENTS/METHODS

Plasma sample collection and ECFC isolations were performed before valve replacement surgery, 3 to 5 days after, and 6 months after surgery. Plasma VWF antigen, activity, propeptide, collagen binding, multimers, factor VIII coagulant activity, and ADAMTS13 activity (a disintegrin-like and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 motifs 13) were determined. ECFCs were assessed for VWF and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) storage and secretion, cell proliferation, and tubule formation in Matrigel.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Aortic stenosis patients exhibited quantitative and qualitative abnormalities of VWF including significantly increased VWF antigen, activity, and propeptide levels following surgery (P < .01). Increased high molecular weight VWF multimers were observed at all time points and in particular 3 to 5 days after surgery (mean = 14% ± 6%) relative to before (mean = 10% ± 4%), suggesting increased proteolysis by ADAMTS13 pre-operatively in a shear-dependent manner. ECFCs from patients with aortic stenosis were more proliferative than controls (P < .05) and had increased retention of Ang-2 (P < .05) suggesting epigenetic modification of the cells. Overall, there are hemostatic changes in AS patients that are present before valve replacement surgery and these persist long after surgery has occurred. These findings have implications for the current clinical management of AS patients.

Evaluation of a fully automated von Willebrand factor assay panel for the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease

INTRODUCTION

von Willebrand disease (VWD) diagnosis starts with first level tests: factor VIII coagulant activity, VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and platelet-dependent VWF activity (VWF:RCo, VWF:Ab, VWF:GPIbR or VWF:GPIbM). The VWF collagen binding (VWF:CB) assay measures the binding capacity of von Willebrand factor (VWF) to collagen.

AIM

To assess, in previously diagnosed VWD patients, the performance of a fully automated chemiluminescent test panel including VWF:Ag, VWF:GPIbR and VWF:CB assays.

METHODS

The patients, historically evaluated using in-house VWF:Ag and VWF:CB assays and an automated latex enhanced immunoassay VWF:GPIbR method, were re-evaluated using the VWF test panel HemosIL AcuStar.

RESULTS

The VWF:GPIbR/VWF:Ag and VWF:CB/VWF:Ag obtained by means of AcuStar showed an overall good concordance with the corresponding data obtained at the time of the historical diagnosis. When discrepancies occurred, these were generally due to the lower VWF:CB/VWF:Ag obtained with AcuStar as compared with that obtained with the historical methods and this affected particularly the diagnosis of VWD type 2M. Together, the AcuStar VWF:GPIbR/VWF:Ag and VWF:CB/VWF:Ag were able to distinguish type 1 from types 2A, 2B and 2M, whereas no distinction was possible between type 2A and 2B.

CONCLUSION

The AcuStar panel offers a good performance in the differential diagnosis between VWD type 1 and 2A/2B patients. A high rate of coincidence with historical diagnosis was obtained for VWD types 3, 2A/2B and 1. Even though in some cases more tests (eg, RIPA/multimeric analysis) are needed to complete an accurate VWD classification, the AcuStar panel is considered a sensitive, rapid and reliable tool to diagnose VWD patients.

Automated assays for von Willebrand factor activity

von Willebrand factor (VWF) ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) by platelet aggregometry has been considered the gold standard for evaluating the ability of VWF to bind platelets for over 40 years. Many automated systems no longer require platelets and rather rely on agglutination of latex particles. Automated methods of measuring VWF activity have improved performance characteristics and are performed on the same coagulation instruments used for routine testing via immunoturbidimetric methodology. Alternatively, a newer chemiluminescence assay system for measuring VWF activity demonstrates excellent performance characteristics. As these methods are becoming widely used, it is important to assess their performance in diagnosing and monitoring different types of von Willebrand disease. We review the automated methodologies and the published performance of these VWF assays. Advantages and limitations of these automated methods are discussed.

Pharmacokinetics of plasma infusion in congenital thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Essentials Congenital thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is primarily treated with plasma infusion. We present a pharmacokinetic analysis of ADAMTS-13 in six patients following plasma infusion. A median half-life of 130 h was demonstrated, ranging between 82.6 and 189.5 h. Investigation of interindividual clearance of ADAMTS-13 is necessary to optimize treatment. SUMMARY: Background Congenital thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is defined by persistent severe deficiency of ADAMTS-13 in the absence of anti-ADAMTS-13 inhibitory antibodies, confirmed by mutational analysis. Replacement of the missing protease prevents disease relapse, primarily using plasma infusion (PI). Objectives, patients and methods There is scant evidence regarding optimal dose and frequency of treatment, which tends to be empirically guided. We present a pharmacokinetic analysis of ADAMTS-13 in six patients with congenital TTP on established regimes following PI. Results We found a median clearance of 25.41 mL h-1 and half-life of 130 h, ranging between 82.6 and 189.5 h (3.4-7.9 days, respectively). All patients reached baseline ADAMTS-13 level within 7-10 days post-plasma. Median ADAMTS-13 activity peak post-PI was 24.05 IU dL-1 . Variation was related to elimination rate, which, in turn, was affected by weight and metabolism, but not to von Willebrand factor antigen or activity levels. Using the pharmacokinetic parameters, we simulated individualized protocols based on PI dose or frequency to target hypothetical optimal plasma levels of ADAMTS-13 of 10 and 50 IU dL-1 , respectively. Results suggest a target trough ADAMTS-13 of 10 IU dL-1 is feasible but 50 IU dL-1 would not be achievable taking into account volume required. Conclusions Further work is needed to compare treatment of congenital TTP with PI vs. recombinant ADAMTS-13. PI may provide longer duration of ADAMTS-13 effect, but is limited by plasma volume required, whereas recombinant therapy can provide a higher ADAMTS-13 peak. We propose that investigation of interindividual clearance of ADAMTS-13 is necessary to optimize treatment and provide the rationale for dose and frequency of prophylaxis.

Evaluation of a semi-automated von Willebrand factor multimer assay, the Hydragel 5 von Willebrand multimer, by two European Centers

BACKGROUND

The phenotypic diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a multistep process with classification dependent on the quantification of von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimeric structure. VWF multimer analysis is a technically challenging, lengthy and non-standardised assay, usually performed in specialist laboratories. Recently, a new semi-automated multimer assay, the Hydragel 5 von Willebrand multimers (H5VWM) has become available.

OBJECTIVES

This study, performed in two European centres, compared existing in-house multimer assays to the H5VWM in individuals with and without VWD.

RESULTS

Overall agreement of 91.1% was observed in 74 individuals with normal VWF levels, 57 patients grouped as type 1 VWD, 33 type 2A, 16 type 2B, 28 type 2M, 11 type 2N. Patients tested following Desmopressin or VWF concentrate, with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and acquired von Willebrand syndrome were also evaluated. Many of the discrepancies between methods were in patients with genetic mutations linked to more than one type of VWD including p.R1374C/H and p.R1315C. Quantifiable multimer results were available within one working day. Densitometry improved the interpretation of the multimers with slight structural variations that were not apparent by visual inspection of the in-house method.

CONCLUSIONS

5VWM was a rapid, sensitive, standardised assay which used existing technology and could be included as an initial screen of VWF multimers in a VWD diagnostic algorithm in conjunction with traditional multimer analysis.

An international collaborative study to compare different von Willebrand factor glycoprotein Ib binding activity assays: the COMPASS-VWF study

Essentials New VWF activity assays are increasingly used but information on their comparability is limited. This is an ISTH SSC-organized study (expert labs, 5 countries) to compare all available assays. VWF activity by six assays correlated well with each other. The new assays show improved characteristics - minor differences are noted. SUMMARY: Background Several new assays have become available to measure von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity. The new assays appear to have improved performance characteristics compared with the old reference standard, ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), but information is limited about how they compare with VWF:RCo and each other. Methods The von Willebrand factor Subcommittee of the International Society for Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) Scientific and Standardization Committee (SSC) designed a collaborative study involving expert laboratories from several countries to compare available tests with each other and with VWF:RCo. Eight laboratories from five countries were provided with blinded samples from normal healthy individuals and well-characterized clinical cases. Laboratories measured VWF activity using all tests available to them; data from six laboratories, not affected by thawing during transportation, are included in this study. Results All tests correlated well with VWF:RCo activity (r-values ranged from 0.963 to 0.989). Slightly steeper regression lines for VWF:Ab and VWF:GPIbM were clinically insignificant. The new assays showed improved performance characteristics. Of the commercially available assays, the VWF:GPIbR using the AcuStar system was the most sensitive and could reliably detect VWF activity below 1 IU dL-1 . The lower limit of the measuring interval for the VWF:GPIbM and the VWF:GPIbR assays was in the 3-4 and 3-6 IU dL-1 range, respectively. Inter-laboratory variation was also improved for most new assays. Conclusion All VWF activity assays correlated well with each other and the VWF:RCo assay. The slight differences in characteristics found in the COMPASS-VWF study will assist the VWF community in interpreting and comparing activity results.

Current and emerging approaches for assessing von Willebrand disease in 2016

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder and is due to a deficiency and/or abnormality of von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWD is inherited in an autosomal dominant or recessive pattern, but women are apparently more symptomatic. Diagnosis of VWD is still difficult in most countries due to the multiple activities of VWF and the heterogeneity of the disease. VWD is mainly associated with mild mucosal bleeding although gastrointestinal and joint bleeds may occur in severe VWD forms. This review describes the most recent clinical and laboratory procedures for the correct diagnosis of VWD. Assays for the evaluation of the platelet-dependent VWF activity (PD-VWFact) with or without ristocetin as well as VWF collagen binding (VWF:CB) are currently in use. However, other tests such as VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), factor VIII procoagulant (

FVIII

C), ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination (RIPA), multimeric analysis (VWF:MA), VWF propeptide (VWFpp), VWF:FVIII binding assay (VWF:FVIIIB), and the assessment of biological response to desmopressin (DDAVP) are necessary to characterize VWD types. Levels of VWF activities <30 U/dL have been associated with a bleeding phenotype and the presence of mutations in the VWF gene.

Perioperative onset of acquired von Willebrand syndrome: Comparison between HVAD, HeartMate II and on-pump coronary bypass surgery

OBJECTIVES

Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AvWS) is associated with postoperative bleeding complications in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs). The aim of this study is to analyze the perioperative vWF profile comparing an axial pump (HMII) to a centrifugal pump (HVAD) regarding the correlation between perioperative occurrence of AvWS, early- and late-postoperative bleeding events.

METHODS

From July 2013 until March 2015 blood samples of 33 patients (12 HMII/ 8 HVAD/ 13 controls) were prospectively collected at 12 different time points and analyzed for the vWF antigen (vWF:Ag), its activity (vWF:Ac) and the vWF:Ac/vWF:Ag-ratio (vWF:ratio). The follow up period for postoperative bleeding events was from July 2013 until July 2016.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, there was no difference in the vWF-profile between HVAD and HMII groups. However, a subgroup of patients already had significantly lower vWF:ratios preoperatively. Postoperatively, both CF-LVAD groups presented significantly lower vWF:ratios compared to the control group. Bleeding events per patient-year did not differ between the two groups (HMII vs. HVAD: 0.67 vs. 0.85, p = 0.685). We detected a correlation between vWF:ratio <0.7at LVAD-start (r = -0.583, p = 0.006) or at the end of surgery (r = -0.461, p = 0.035) and the occurrence of pericardial tamponade. In the control group, the drop in both vWF:Ag and vWF:Ac recovered immediately postoperatively above preoperative values.

CONCLUSION

A subgroup of patients with end-stage heart failure already suffers AvWS preoperatively. In both CF-LVAD groups, AvWS begins immediately after surgery. Intraoperative vWF:ratios <0.7 correlate with higher incidences of pericardial tamponade and re-operation. The presumably dilutive effect of the heart lung machine on vWF vanishes immediately at the end of surgery, possibly as part of an acute-phase response.

Laboratory Testing for von Willebrand Factor Activity by Glycoprotein Ib Binding Assays (VWF:GPIb)

In addition to assessment of von Willebrand factor (VWF) antigen (VWF:Ag), the first-line laboratory investigation of possible von Willebrand disease (VWD) often includes an assay to measure GPIb (glycoprotein Ib) binding activity of VWF. A decreased GPIb binding activity is characteristic for most of the VWD types. For many years, the most frequently used assay for measuring GPIb binding activity was the ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo), which measures the agglutination of fixed human platelets by VWF in the presence of ristocetin. Because of performance issues, including high assay variability and a lack of VWF sensitivity, this assay is currently being replaced or supplemented by assays based on the binding of VWF to recombinant GPIb. One published method (now abbreviated VWF:GPIbR) uses wild-type GPIb for triggering the binding reaction in the presence of ristocetin. Another more widely used method (now abbreviated VWF:GPIbM) uses gain-of-function GPIb without ristocetin; this permits spontaneous binding of VWF to GPIb and avoids problems associated with the nonphysiological substance ristocetin. The binding of VWF to GPIb can be quantified by using different principles, e.g., ELISA, particle agglutination, or chemiluminescence. The following chapter describes a ristocetin-free method based on particle agglutination in more detail.

Comparison of von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity levels determined by HemosIL AcuStar assay and HemosIL LIA assay with ristocetin cofactor assay by aggregometry

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) requires quantitative as well as qualitative determination of von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels. For functional assessment of VWF, ristocetin cofactor assay by aggregometry is considered to be the gold standard. However, need for technical expertise, labour intensiveness, difficult standardization and high intra- and inter- assay variabilities are some of the limitations of this methodology. Various assays for determination of VWF adhesive function using different methodologies have been developed in recent years.

AIM

To evaluate the HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescence assay (VWF:RCo[Acu]) and the HemosIL latex immunoassay (VWF:act) as diagnostic tests for VWD and identification of type 2 VWD in comparison with the ristocetin cofactor assay performed by aggregometry (VWF:RCo[Agg]).

METHODS

Results from 96 samples analysed by VWF:RCo[Acu] and 128 samples by VWF:act were compared with VWF:RCo[Agg]. Sixty of these samples (25 normal, 17 type 1 and 18 type 2) were analysed by all three assays.

RESULTS

VWF:RCo[Acu] showed excellent agreement with VWF:RCo[Agg], and readily identified all type 2 VWD samples tested. VWF:act showed reasonable agreement with VWF:RCo[Agg] for most patients, but had a slightly lower sensitivity for detection of type 2 VWD.

CONCLUSION

VWF:RCo[Acu] assay has the potential to replace VWF:RCo[Agg] for the diagnosis of VWD.

Rapid discrimination of the phenotypic variants of von Willebrand disease

Approximately 20% to 25% of patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) have a qualitative defect of the von Willebrand factor (VWF) protein activities. Variant VWD typically is classified as type 1C, 2A, 2B, 2M, or 2N depending on the VWF activity defect. Traditionally, diagnosis has relied on multiple clinical laboratory assays to assign VWD phenotype. We developed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to measure the various activities of VWF on a single plate and evaluated 160 patient samples enrolled in the Zimmerman Program for the Molecular and Clinical Biology of von Willebrand Disease with type 2 VWD. Using linear discriminate analysis (LDA), this assay was able to identify type 1C, 2A, 2B, 2M, or 2N VWD with an overall accuracy of 92.5% in the patient study cohort. LDA jackknife analysis, a statistical resampling technique, identified variant VWD with an overall accuracy of 88.1%, which predicts the assay's performance in the general population. In addition, this assay demonstrated correlation with traditional clinical laboratory VWF assays. The VWF multiplex activity assay may be useful as a same-day screening assay when considering the diagnosis of variant VWD in an individual patient.

Diagnosis of inherited von Willebrand disease: comparison of two methodologies and analysis of the discrepancies

Diagnostics of von Willebrand disease (VWD) includes assessment of factor VIII (FVIII) coagulant activity, von Willebrand factor (VWF) antigen (VWF:Ag) and VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), and more specific tests as multimeric and genetic analyses are necessary for the correct VWD classification. The ACL AcuStar analyzer introduces chemiluminescence (CL) technology in detection of VWD with automated VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo assays. Compare VWF:Ag-ELISA and VWF:RCo by aggregometry conventional assays with new CL VWF:Ag-IL and VWF:RCo-IL assays, investigate the ability to make accurate VWD diagnosis and concordance with multimeric and genetic analyses. 146 patients with congenital VWD (51 Type 1; 34 Type 2A; 16 Type 2B; 31 Type 2M; 5 Type 2N; 9 Type 3) and 30 healthy normal subjects were included. A comparison was made between CL and conventional methods. Diagnostic evaluation included: VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio, multimeric distribution (sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]-agarose gel) of VWF and genetic analysis in 110 of 146 patients. CL and conventional methods revealed good correlation. Kappa test agreement diagnosis was >0.8. CL diagnostic sensitivity was 100% and specificity 97%. Multimeric and genetic analysis were of help in clarifying 13 discrepancies of diagnosis between methods, of which six discrepancies were explained by lack of conventional methods′ sensibility. CL methodology can detect VWD and discriminate between type 1, 3 and variant forms and offers an automated, faster, sensitive and less cumbersome method when compared to conventional assays, in particular VWF:RCo by aggregometry. In some cases, even with all phenotype and genetic analyses, discrepancies exist in the classification of VWD.

Laboratory aspects of von Willebrand disease: test repertoire and options for activity assays and genetic analysis

The deficiency or abnormal function of von Willebrand factor (VWF) causes von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most frequent inherited bleeding disorder. The laboratory diagnosis of VWD can be difficult as the disease is heterogeneous and an array of assays is required to describe the phenotype. Basic classification of quantitative (type 1 and 3) and qualitative (type 2) VWD variants requires determination of VWF antigenic (VWF:Ag) levels and assaying of VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) activity, determining the capacity of VWF to interact with the platelet GPIb-receptor. Knowing the VWF:RCo activity is essential for identifying, subtyping and monitoring VWD, but the assay is poorly standardized and many protocols do not fulfil the clinical need in all situations. This has led to the development of novel activity assays, independent of ristocetin, with enhanced assay characteristics. Results from the first independent clinical evaluations are promising, showing that they are reliable and suitable for VWD diagnosis. The qualitative type 2 VWF deficiency can be further divided into four different subtypes (A, B, M and N) using specific assays that explore other activities or the size distribution of VWF multimers. These methods are discussed herein. However, in a number of patients it may be difficult to correctly classify the VWD phenotype and genetic analysis may provide the best option to clarify the disorder, through mutation identification.

Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of VWD

VWD is the most common inherited bleeding disorder and is due to a deficiency and/or abnormality of VWF. VWD is inherited in an autosomal-dominant or autosomal-recessive pattern, but women are apparently more symptomatic. Three main criteria are required for correct diagnoses of VWD: (1) positive bleeding history since childhood, (2) reduced VWF activity in plasma, and (3) history of bleeding in the family. The bleeding score, together with baseline VWF levels and family history, have been proposed as more evidence-based criteria for VWD. Measurements of a reduced VWF activity in plasma are essential for the diagnosis of VWD; assays for the evaluation of the interactions between VWF and platelet glycoprotein Ib receptor with or without ristocetin, as well as VWF collagen binding, are currently in use. However, other tests such as VWF antigen, factor VIII, ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination, multimeric analysis, VWF propeptide, VWF/FVIII binding assay, and assessment of biological response to desmopressin are necessary to characterize VWD types. Levels of VWF activities <30 U/dL have been associated with a bleeding phenotype and the presence of mutations in the VWF gene.

Performance of two new automated assays for measuring von Willebrand activity: HemosIL AcuStar and Innovance

The ristocetin cofactor activity assay (VWF:RCo) is the reference method for assessing von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity but remains difficult to perform, and the coefficient of variation of the method is high (about 20-30%). This study evaluated and compared the performance for measuring the VWF activity of two newly commercialised assays [VWF:Ac Innovance (VWF:Ac) and VWF:RCo Acustar (VWF:RCo Acu)] with the reference VWF:RCo aggregation in 123 pathological plasma samples. The correlation and concordance between both new tests (VWF:RCo-Acu and VWF:Ac) and the reference VWF:RCo were good. The results of the VWF activity to VWF antigen ratio were also comparable whatever the method for the classification of VWF deficiency in all patients. Our results showed that both new tests could replace the "gold standard" VWF:RCo in aggregometry with several benefits: they are fully automated, easier and faster to perform, better adapted to emergency situations if necessary.

Diagnostic challenges in patients with bleeding phenotype and von Willebrand exon 28 polymorphism p.D1472H

Exon 28 polymorphism p.D1472H is associated with significantly lower von Willebrand Ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCoF) to von Willebrand antigen (VWF:Ag) ratio compared to normal, but has been reported as not conferring haemorrhagic risk. The impact of this polymorphism while assessing symptomatic patients for von Willebrand disease (VWD) has not been previously analysed. We retrospectively reviewed charts of children with clinically significant bleeding and abnormal VW panel who underwent VW exon 28 analysis. Twenty-three of 63 patients studied had p.D1472H. Of these 23 patients, 6 with borderline low VWF:RCo were given provisional diagnosis of VWD type 1 by treating physicians, which could be alternatively explained as due to the effect of p.D1472H. None of the patients with low VWF:RCo, decreased VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio and p.D1472H had VWD type 2M mutations identified. This study illustrates the challenge in diagnosing VWD using ristocetin-based VW assay in symptomatic patients with p.D1472H.

Perils, problems, and progress in laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand disease

Diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) merits consideration of personal and family history of bleeding symptoms along with confirmatory laboratory testing. As the latter yields quantifiable results, overreliance on a laboratory diagnosis may occur. However, existing tests for VWD contain potential sources for error. Both intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting these assays can contribute to either falsely normal or falsely abnormal results. This article will discuss the present available assays as well as new developments in diagnostic testing. A clear understanding of the limitations of VWD testing is helpful for ensuring the correct diagnosis of affected patients.

von Willebrand disease: advances in pathogenetic understanding, diagnosis, and therapy

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common autosomally inherited bleeding disorder. The disease represents a range of quantitative and qualitative pathologies of the adhesive glycoprotein von Willebrand factor (VWF). The pathogenic mechanisms responsible for the type 2 qualitative variants of VWF are now well characterized, with most mutations representing missense substitutions influencing VWF multimer structure and interactions with platelet GPIbα and collagen and with factor VIII. The molecular pathology of type 3 VWD has been similarly well characterized, with an array of different mutation types producing either a null phenotype or the production of VWF that is not secreted. In contrast, the pathogenetic mechanisms responsible for type 1 VWD remain only partially resolved. In the hemostasis laboratory, the measurement of VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo are key components in the diagnostic algorithm for VWD, although the introduction of direct GPIbα-binding assays may become the functional assay of choice. Molecular genetic testing can provide additional benefit, but its utility is currently limited to type 2 and 3 VWD. The treatment of bleeding in VWD involves the use of desmopressin and plasma-derived VWF concentrates and a variety of adjunctive agents. Finally, a new recombinant VWF concentrate has just completed clinical trial evaluation and has demonstrated excellent hemostatic efficacy and safety.

von Willebrand disease: advances in pathogenetic understanding, diagnosis, and therapy

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common autosomally inherited bleeding disorder. The disease represents a range of quantitative and qualitative pathologies of the adhesive glycoprotein von Willebrand factor (VWF). The pathogenic mechanisms responsible for the type 2 qualitative variants of VWF are now well characterized, with most mutations representing missense substitutions influencing VWF multimer structure and interactions with platelet GPIbα and collagen and with factor VIII. The molecular pathology of type 3 VWD has been similarly well characterized, with an array of different mutation types producing either a null phenotype or the production of VWF that is not secreted. In contrast, the pathogenetic mechanisms responsible for type 1 VWD remain only partially resolved. In the hemostasis laboratory, the measurement of VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo are key components in the diagnostic algorithm for VWD, although the introduction of direct GPIbα-binding assays may become the functional assay of choice. Molecular genetic testing can provide additional benefit, but its utility is currently limited to type 2 and 3 VWD. The treatment of bleeding in VWD involves the use of desmopressin and plasma-derived VWF concentrates and a variety of adjunctive agents. Finally, a new recombinant VWF concentrate has just completed clinical trial evaluation and has demonstrated excellent hemostatic efficacy and safety.