Variability in platelet- and collagen-binding defects in type 2M von Willebrand disease

Von Willebrand Factor Multimer Analysis and Classification: A Comprehensive Review and Updates

Von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a multimeric glycoprotein with essential roles in primary hemostasis. Patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD), due to quantitative and/or qualitative defects of VWF usually experience mucocutaneous bleeding. Based on the laboratory results of VWF antigen, various VWF activities, factor VIII activity, and VWF multimer patterns, VWD can be categorized as type 1, 2, and 3 VWD. VWF multimer analysis by either manual or semi-automated electrophoresis and immunoblotting is a critical part of the laboratory testing to differentiate type 1, type 2 VWD, and subtypes of type 1 or 2 VWD. The multimer distribution patterns can also help to understand the underlying molecular mechanism of VWF synthesis, multimerization, and clearance defects in VWD. This review will cover VWF synthesis, multimerization, secretion, VWF multimer analysis, and VWF multimer interpretation of various types and subtypes of VWD.

Type 2A and 2M von Willebrand Disease: Differences in Phenotypic Parameters According to the Affected Domain by Disease-Causing Variants and Assessment of Pathophysiological Mechanisms

Type 2A and 2M von Willebrand disease (VWD) broadly show similar phenotypic parameters, but involve different pathophysiological mechanisms. This report presents the clinical and laboratory profiles of type 2A and type 2M patients genotypically diagnosed at one large center. Higher bleeding score values and a higher incidence of major bleeding episodes were observed in type 2A compared with type 2M, potentially reflective of the absence of large and intermediate von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimers in 2A. In type 2A, most of disease-causing variants (DCVs) appeared to be responsible for increased VWF clearance and DCV clustered in the VWF-A1 domain resulted in more severe clinical profiles. In type 2M, DCV in the VWF-A1 domain showed different laboratory patterns, related to either reduced synthesis or shortened VWF survival, and DCV in the VWF-A2 domain showed patterns related mainly to shortened survival. VWF-type 1 collagen binding/Ag (C1B/Ag) showed different patterns according to DCV location: in type 2A VWD, C1B/Ag was much lower when DCVs were located in the VWF-A2 domain. In type 2M with DCV in the VWF-A1domain, C1B/Ag was normal, but with DCV in the VWF-A2 domain, C1B/Ag was low. The higher frequency of major bleeding in VWD 2M patients with DCV in the VWF-A2 domain than that with DCV in the VWF-A1 domain could be a summative effect of abnormal C1B/Ag, on top of the reduced VWF-GPIb binding. In silico modeling suggests that DCV impairing the VWF-A2 domain somehow modulates collagen binding to the VWF-A3 domain. Concomitant normal FVIII:C/Ag and VWFpp/Ag, mainly in type 2M VWD, suggest that other nonidentified pathophysiological mechanisms, neither related to synthesis/retention nor survival of VWF, would be responsible for the presenting phenotype.

Improving diagnosis of von Willebrand disease: Reference ranges for von Willebrand factor multimer distribution

BACKGROUND

Phenotypic von Willebrand disease (VWD) classification requires multiple tests including analysis of multimeric distributions von Willebrand factor (VWF) and evaluation of its structure. VWF multimer analysis is labor intensive, nonstandardized, and limited to specialized laboratories. A commercial semiautomatic assay, HYDRAGEL VW multimer assay (H5/11VWM, Sebia), has become available.

OBJECTIVES

Establishment of reference ranges for H5/11VWM to improve VWD classification.

METHODS

Implementation validation, establishment and validation of normal and pathological reference intervals (NRIs/PRIs), comparison with in-house method using 40 healthy volunteers and 231 VWD patients.

RESULTS

Qualitative and quantitative validation of NRI obtained sensitivity of 88% and 79%, respectively, for type 2. Comparison of the two methods showed an overall concordance of 86% with major conflicting results in all atypical 2B (n = 7) and 50% 2M-GPIb (n = 41) showing quantitative and qualitative multimeric loss, that was not detected with in-house method. We were able to use established PRIs, with 73% validity in type 2 cases, to distinguish individual type 2A subtypes (IIA, IIC, IID, IIE) from 2M and 2B.

CONCLUSION

H5/11VWM could be used for all clinical purposes because its reliability and its rapid and accurate diagnostic ability and reduced observer bias. Although H5/11VWM cannot evaluate triplet structures, we were able to define 2A subtypes by stripping back to the percentage of intermediate/high-molecular-weight multimers. H5/11HWM could be an efficient and widely available alternative for the "gold standard" technique.

Navigating the Myriad of von Willebrand Factor Assays

von Willebrand factor (VWF) represents a large and complex adhesive plasma protein whose main function is to provide a bridge between blood platelets and damaged endothelium, and thus facilitate primary hemostasis. VWF also binds to FVIII, preventing early proteolysis, and delivers this cargo to sites of vascular injury, thereby promoting clot formation and secondary hemostasis. An absence, deficiency, or defect in VWF can lead to a bleeding diathesis called von Willebrand disease (VWD), considered the most common inherited bleeding disorder. Contemporary laboratory assays used in VWD diagnosis/exclusion comprise a myriad of assays that identify the quantity (level) of VWF, as well as the multitude of VWF activities. These may use the following test abbreviations: VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, VWF:CB, VWF:GPIbR, VWF:GPIbM, VWF:FVIIB, VWF:Ab. The current review explains what these assays are, as well as their place in VWD diagnostics.

Semi-automated von Willebrand factor multimer assay for von Willebrand disease: Further validation, benefits and limitations

INTRODUCTION

Accurate diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) enables effective patient management. von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimer analysis provides useful information regarding VWF multimer structure, thereby aiding VWD subtyping and management; however, historically technically challenging assays have had limited utility. This study evaluates the Sebia Hydrasys Hydragel-11 semi-automated VWF multimer assay and further validates the Hydragel-5 gel system, as primarily pertaining to VWD diagnostics and monitoring of therapy.

METHODS

Provisionally diagnosed (via a reference assay test panel) archived patient samples and prospective test patient samples, including those undergoing desmopressin trial or therapy monitoring, along with commercial and in-house control material and various external quality assessment (EQA) samples, were analysed. VWF multimers were evaluated for presence, loss or partial loss of high molecular weight (HMWM) and intermediate molecular weight (IMWM) multimers by both visual inspection and densitometric scanning, and comparison with reference assay results.

RESULTS

All anticipated multimer patterns were reproduced, with patients generally showing multimer profiles matching expected patterns according to VWD type based on reference test panel 'diagnosis'. Occasional discrepancies were resolved by retesting. The increase in plasma VWF following desmopressin therapy was also clearly demonstrated. Multimer profiles of EQA samples complemented reference test panel results and matched EQA targets. There were some 'technical' limitations noted.

CONCLUSION

This easy to use, standardised, semi-automated multimer analysis system can demonstrate the multimer profile of VWD patients, thus representing an additional laboratory tool for improved diagnosis, thereby facilitating appropriate patient management.

How I investigate for bleeding disorders

INTRODUCTION

Laboratory investigations for bleeding disorders are warranted when an individual has a personal and/or family history of bleeding, and/or laboratory findings that suggest the possibility of an inherited or acquired bleeding disorder.

METHODS

This review summarizes author's experience with ordering and reporting on diagnostic investigations for common and rare bleeding disorders, with consideration of recent articles on diagnosing bleeding disorders. An updated strategy is presented for investigating common and rare, congenital and acquired bleeding disorders.

RESULTS

An investigation of a suspected bleeding disorder requires a practical strategy that considers the clinical problem to be investigated, the pretest probability of true-positive and false-positive findings, the investigations can be performed locally or in a reference laboratory and limit the number of blood samples required to establish a diagnosis. It is often advantageous to simultaneously test for von Willebrand disease and platelet function disorders, and for coagulation defects, including fibrinogen disorders. An investigation for rarer bleeding disorders, including those affecting factor XIII, α₂ antiplasmin, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, is appropriate when faced with a severe congenital or acquired bleeding problem that cannot be explained by the initial diagnostic investigations.

CONCLUSION

An organized strategy for investigating bleeding disorders that consider important issues, confirms abnormal findings, encourages proper interpretation of the results, and provides a helpful framework for assessing both common and rare causes of bleeding.

The elusive and heterogeneous pattern of type 2M von Willebrand disease: A diagnostic challenge

Type 2M is a very heterogeneous form of von Willebrand disease (VWD) associated with impaired platelet and von Willebrand factor (VWF) interactions not due to a lack of large VWF multimers.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate type 2M heterogeneity and to establish the most appropriate diagnostic flowchart.

METHODS

Hemostatic and genetic VWF analyses were performed in 14 type 2M VWD patients carrying the p.G1324S, p.R1374H, p.R1374C, p.A1344_A1350del, or p.F1293L mutations.

RESULTS

PFA-100 was always significantly prolonged, and ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA) and VWF ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) greatly reduced or absent. Plasma VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) was reduced except in the p.G1324S patient, while platelet VWF:Ag was normal or near normal except in the p.R1374C patients. The ratio of collagen binding (VWF:CB) to VWF:Ag was normal or near normal except in patients carrying the p.R1374H and p.A1344_A1350del mutations, whose large VWF multimers were slightly reduced. Multimer patterns were normal or lacking in large oligomers, or with larger than normal VWF components.

CONCLUSIONS

Only PFA100, RIPA and VWF:RCo were always abnormal. We thus propose a minimal diagnostic test battery: RIPA (demonstrating the defective VWF-platelet interaction), VWF:Ag (exploring VWF synthesis), and VWF:CB and its ratio (to explore multimer patterns). Other tests would only serve for confirmation, if necessary.

Combined effects of two mutations in von Willebrand disease 2M phenotype

BACKGROUND

Type 2M von Willebrand disease (VWD2M) is usually characterized by VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag<0.6 and normal multimeric profile; desmopressin (DDAVP) challenge test commonly shows poor response of VWF:RCo.

OBJECTIVE

We describe the bleeding tendency and the laboratory phenotype in a patient carrying two heterozygous mutations affecting VWF-A1 domain and VWF-A2 domain.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

A 12-year-old patient (O blood group) with severe hemorrhagic tendency was phenotypically and genotypically analyzed; his parents were also studied.

RESULTS

The proband showed decrease FVIII:C, VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag, and VWF:CB6/VWF:Ag ratios, but normal platelet count, VWF:CB1/VWF:Ag ratio, VWFpp and multimeric pattern, suggesting a VWD2M phenotype. The DDAVP challenge test, compared to controls (VWD2M patients with mutations in VWF-A1 domain), showed lower increase of FVIII:C and VWF:Ag than in heterozygous, but very similar to homozygous control. Two mutations were found in heterozygous and trans presentation: p.Pro1648fs*45 and a novel missense mutation, p.Arg1426Cys. The mother was p.Arg1426Cys heterozygous carrier, with few clinical symptoms. The father was asymptomatic, with no mutations. The p.Pro1648fs*45 was considered an apparent de novo mutation; proband's AS-PCR revealed mosaicism in the paternal allele. According to the predicted models, p.Arg1426Cys would not be affecting the binding of GPIbα to A1 domain, whereas p.Pro1648fs*45 seems to modify the folding of A2 domain, and in this way, it would affect the binding to GPIbα and type VI collagen. We believe that the combination of these two heterozygous mutations, in a child with O blood group, could result in a defective phenotype enhancer.

How much do we really know about von Willebrand disease?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the last nine decades, large advances have been made toward the characterization of the pathogenic basis and clinical management of von Willebrand disease (VWD), the most prevalent inherited bleeding disorder. Pathological variations at the von Willebrand factor (VWF) locus present as a range of both quantitative and qualitative abnormalities that make up the complex clinical spectrum of VWD. This review describes the current understanding of the pathobiological basis of VWD.

RECENT FINDINGS

The molecular basis of type 2 (qualitative abnormalities) and type 3 VWD (total quantitative deficiency) have been well characterized in recent decades. However, knowledge of type 1 VWD (partial quantitative deficiency) remains incomplete because of the allelic and locus heterogeneity of this trait, and is complicated by genetic variability at the VWF gene, interactions between the VWF gene and the environment, and the involvement of external modifying loci. Recent genome wide association studies and linkage analyses have sought to identify additional genes that modify the type 1 VWD phenotype.

SUMMARY

Understanding the pathogenic basis of VWD will facilitate the development of novel treatment regimens for this disorder, and improve the ability to provide complementary molecular diagnostics for type 1 VWD.

Clinical and laboratory phenotype variability in type 2M von Willebrand disease

Essentials The pathophysiology of type 2M von Willebrand disease (VWD) is poorly understood. Sequence variations in type 2M VWD subjects were characterized. A high degree of clinical and laboratory variability exists within type 2M VWD variants. Some type 2M variants may share features of type 2A VWD.

SUMMARY

Background von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a multimeric coagulation factor that tethers platelets to injured subendothelium. Type 2M von Willebrand disease (VWD) is characterized by a qualitative defect in VWF with preserved multimer distribution. Objectives Through the Zimmerman Program for the Molecular and Clinical Biology for VWD, five VWF sequence variations were studied in subjects diagnosed with type 2M VWD. Methods Bleeding phenotype was assessed using the ISTH bleeding assessment tool. Full-length VWF gene sequencing was performed for each subject. Each variant was placed into a recombinant VWF vector using site-directed mutagenesis and expressed in HEK293T cells as homozygous or heterozygous VWF. Variant expression, collagen binding and platelet GPIbα binding were studied through ELISA assays. Multimer analysis was performed by gel electrophoresis. Results Bleeding scores were elevated for all subjects except for the p.P1162L and p.R1374C variants. Although all had reduced VWF ristocetin cofactor activity/VWF antigen ratios on plasma testing, recombinant VWF did not show a classic type 2M phenotype for any of the five variants. Homozygous expression of variants p.D1283Y, p.R1349C, p.R1374C and p.I1453N was consistent with type 2A VWD, although all had normal expression as heterozygous recombinant VWF. Variant p.P1162L had normal VWF expression and function, consistent with the lack of bleeding symptoms. Conclusions Although originally classified as type 2M VWD, these homozygous recombinant VWF variants do not fulfill complete 2M VWD diagnostic criteria. A better classification schema and improved testing for putative type 2M variants is needed in order to effectively diagnose and treat affected patients.

Utility of the von Willebrand factor collagen binding assay in the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease

von Willebrand Disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder and also arises as an acquired defect (AVWS). VWD and AVWS are due to quantitative deficiencies and/or qualitative defects in von Willebrand factor (VWF), an adhesive plasma protein with multiple activities. Diagnosis of VWD is problematic, being subject to overdiagnosis, underdiagnosis, and misdiagnosis. This is largely due to limitations in current test procedures and an over-reliance on these imperfect test systems for clinical diagnosis. VWF essentially acts to assist in the formation of a platelet thrombus to stop blood loss from sites of injury, achieving this by binding to platelets (primarily through the glycoprotein Ib receptor), binding to subendothelial matrix components (primarily collagen), and binding to factor VIII (FVIII), thus protecting FVIII from degradation and enabling its delivery to sites of vascular injury. VWD is classified into six separate types, which may each be differentially managed therapeutically, and this underscores the importance of a correct diagnosis. The current report concisely reviews the utility of a relatively underutilised assay, the VWF collagen binding assay (VWF:CB), in facilitating the correct diagnosis and typing of VWD. In particular, if laboratories do not utilise the VWF:CB, then (i) type 2M VWD will continue to be missed, and/or misdiagnosed as types 2A or 1 VWD, and (ii) types 2A, 2B and PT-VWD will continue to be missed, or else be misdiagnosed as type 1 VWD or ITP. Am. J. Hematol. 92:114-118, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

What have we learned from large population studies of von Willebrand disease?

Von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a critical regulator of hemostatic processes, including collagen binding, platelet adhesion, and platelet aggregation. It also serves as a carrier protein to normalize plasma factor VIII synthesis, release, and survival. While VWF protein measurements by immunoassay are reasonably comparable between institutions, the measurement of VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) has significant variability. Other tests of VWF function, including collagen binding or platelet glycoprotein IIb-IIIa binding, are not universally available, yet these functional defects may cause major bleeding even with normal VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and VWF:RCo assays. This results in both the overdiagnosis and underdiagnosis of VWD. Newer assays of VWF function (using recombinant glycoprotein Ib rather than whole platelets) have been developed that may improve interlaboratory variability. Some of these tests are not uniformly available and may not be licensed in the United States. Large longitudinal studies of VWF in von Willebrand disease (VWD) patients are not available. Patients are sometimes diagnosed with a single diagnostic VWF panel. Plasma VWF levels increase with age, but it is not clear if this results in less bleeding or whether different normal ranges should be used to identify age-related decreases in VWF. In order to quantitatively compare bleeding symptoms in VWD patients and normal individuals, recent studies in the European Union, Canada, United Kingdom, Holland, and the United States have used semiquantitative bleeding assessment tools (BATs). Even with careful centralized testing, including functional assays of VWF, addition of a BAT does not solve all of the problems with VWD diagnosis. No matter where the line is drawn for diagnosis of VWD, VWF is still a continuous variable. Thus, VWD can be a severe hemorrhagic disease requiring frequent treatment or a mild condition that may not be clinically relevant. As will be discussed by Dr. Goodeve in her presentation, genetics has helped us to diagnose type 2 functional variants of VWD but has not been helpful for the many patients who are at the interface of normal and low VWF and carry the possible diagnosis of type 1 VWD. The hematologist's management of patients with reduced levels of VWF still requires both the art and science of clinical medicine.

Variable bleeding phenotype in an Amish pedigree with von Willebrand disease

Through a cross-sectional study design, the bleeding phenotype in the Amish in Indiana (IN) and Wisconsin (WI) was described using two different bleeding scores. von Willebrand factor (VWF) testing was performed and bleeding questionnaires from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and European MCMDM-1 (Tosetto bleeding score (BS)) were administered to the IN and WI cohort respectively. Seven hundred and seventy nine subjects were recruited, 17% were diagnosed with VWD based on Ristocetin cofactor, VWF:RCo < 30 IU/dl. Majority of the affected (AF), 67%, were tested and had a common mutation c.4120 C > T. The WI AF were much younger at a mean age 15 years vs 26 years in IN AF cohort. The AF subjects had a median VWF:RCo of 13IU/dl with a statistically significant higher median BS 1 versus 0 in the WI AF vs WI Unaffected (UA), 2 vs 1 in the IN AF vs IN UA, P < 0.01. Adults had a higher median BS compared to children in the WI and IN cohort, 2 vs 1 and 3 vs 1 respectively (P < 0.05) but there was no statistically significant difference in the BS between males and females in either cohort. The common symptoms reported were epistaxis and gingival oozing. BS ≥ 3 and BS ≥ 4 were observed in 46% of AF IN and 16.6% of AF WI, respectively. There was significant variability in the bleeding phenotype, with an overall low BS in the affected Amish with VWD, despite a unifying mutation. Am. J. Hematol. 91:E431-E435, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Using genetic diagnostics in hemophilia and von Willebrand disease

Most bleeding disorders encountered in clinical practice will be diagnosed, at least initially, by phenotypic assays. However, since the characterization of the genes that encode coagulation factors in the 1980s, significant progress has been made in translating this knowledge for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. For hemophilia A and B, molecular genetic testing to determine carrier status, prenatal diagnosis, and likelihood of inhibitor development or anaphylaxis to infused coagulation factor concentrates is an established component of comprehensive clinical management. In contrast, although significant recent advances in our understanding of the molecular genetic basis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) have allowed for the development of rational approaches to genetic diagnostics, questions remain about this complex genetic disorder and how to incorporate emerging knowledge into diagnostic strategies. This article will review the state-of-the-art for molecular diagnostics for both hemophilia and VWD.

Crucial role for the VWF A1 domain in binding to type IV collagen

Von Willebrand factor (VWF) contains binding sites for platelets and for vascular collagens to facilitate clot formation at sites of injury. Although previous work has shown that VWF can bind type IV collagen (collagen 4), little characterization of this interaction has been performed. We examined the binding of VWF to collagen 4 in vitro and extended this characterization to a murine model of defective VWF-collagen 4 interactions. The interactions of VWF and collagen 4 were further studied using plasma samples from a large study of both healthy controls and subjects with different types of von Willebrand disease (VWD). Our results show that collagen 4 appears to bind VWF exclusively via the VWF A1 domain, and that specific sequence variations identified through VWF patient samples and through site-directed mutagenesis in the VWF A1 domain can decrease or abrogate this interaction. In addition, VWF-dependent platelet binding to collagen 4 under flow conditions requires an intact VWF A1 domain. We observed that decreased binding to collagen 4 was associated with select VWF A1 domain sequence variations in type 1 and type 2M VWD. This suggests an additional mechanism through which VWF variants may alter hemostasis.

How I treat type 2 variant forms of von Willebrand disease

Type 2 von Willebrand disease (VWD) includes a wide range of qualitative abnormalities of von Willebrand factor structure and function resulting in a variable bleeding tendency. According to the current classification, 4 different subtypes can be identified, each with distinctive phenotypic and therapeutic characteristics. Current available laboratory methods allow a straightforward approach to VWD subtyping, and although the precise molecular characterization remains complex, it is not required for appropriate treatment of the vast majority of cases. Desmopressin can be useful only in a few type 2 cases compared with patients with actual quantitative deficiency (type 1), most often in variants with a nearly normal multimeric pattern (type 2M). However, since no laboratory test accurately predicts response to desmopressin, a trial test should always be performed in all type 2 VWD patients, with the exception of type 2B ones. Replacement therapy with plasma-derived von Willebrand factor-factor VIII concentrates represents the safe mainstay of treatment of all patients, particularly those not responding to desmopressin or requiring a sustained hemostatic correction because of major surgery or bleeding. A significant patient bleeding history correlates with increased bleeding risk and should be considered in tailoring the optimal antihemorrhagic prophylaxis in the individual patient.

von Willebrand factor, Jedi knight of the bloodstream

When blood vessels are cut, the forces in the bloodstream increase and change character. The dark side of these forces causes hemorrhage and death. However, von Willebrand factor (VWF), with help from our circulatory system and platelets, harnesses the same forces to form a hemostatic plug. Force and VWF function are so closely intertwined that, like members of the Jedi Order in the movie Star Wars who learn to use "the Force" to do good, VWF may be considered the Jedi knight of the bloodstream. The long length of VWF enables responsiveness to flow. The shape of VWF is predicted to alter from irregularly coiled to extended thread-like in the transition from shear to elongational flow at sites of hemostasis and thrombosis. Elongational force propagated through the length of VWF in its thread-like shape exposes its monomers for multimeric binding to platelets and subendothelium and likely also increases affinity of the A1 domain for platelets. Specialized domains concatenate and compact VWF during biosynthesis. A2 domain unfolding by hydrodynamic force enables postsecretion regulation of VWF length. Mutations in VWF in von Willebrand disease contribute to and are illuminated by VWF biology. I attempt to integrate classic studies on the physiology of hemostatic plug formation into modern molecular understanding, and point out what remains to be learned.

Perils, problems, and progress in laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand disease

Diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) merits consideration of personal and family history of bleeding symptoms along with confirmatory laboratory testing. As the latter yields quantifiable results, overreliance on a laboratory diagnosis may occur. However, existing tests for VWD contain potential sources for error. Both intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting these assays can contribute to either falsely normal or falsely abnormal results. This article will discuss the present available assays as well as new developments in diagnostic testing. A clear understanding of the limitations of VWD testing is helpful for ensuring the correct diagnosis of affected patients.

On the versatility of von Willebrand factor

Von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a large multimeric protein, the function of which has been demonstrated to be pivotal to the haemostatic system. Indeed, quantitative and/or qualitative abnormalities of VWF are associated with the bleeding disorder Von Willebrand disease (VWD). Moreover, increased plasma concentrations of VWF have been linked to an increased risk for thrombotic complications. In the previous decades, many studies have contributed to our understanding of how VWF is connected to the haemostatic system, particularly with regard to structure-function relationships. Interactive sites for important ligands of VWF (such as factor VIII, collagen, glycoprotein Ibα, integrin αIIbβ3 and protease ADAMTS13) have been identified, and mutagenesis studies have confirmed the physiological relevance of the interactions between VWF and these ligands. However, we have also become aware that VWF has a more versatile character than previously thought, given its potential role in various non-hemostatic processes, like intimal thickening, tumor cell apoptosis and inflammatory processes. In the presence review, a summary of our knowledge on VWF structure-function relationships is provided in the context of the “classical” haemostatic task of VWF and in perspective of pathological processes beyond haemostasis.