European retrospective study of real-life haemophilia treatment

An observational study of haemophilia A patients without inhibitors using the French national claims (SNDS) database

OBJECTIVES

To describe clinical characteristics, factor consumption, and events of interest in patients with haemophilia A without inhibitors receiving prophylaxis in France, and the clinical impact of switching to Elocta® in this population.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study using the Système National des Données de Santé database, analysed data from patients with haemophilia A without inhibitors using prophylactic factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy during 2016-2019. Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and switches, factor consumption, and rate of events of interest were determined. In a sub-cohort of patients treated with Elocta®, clinical characteristics, factor consumption, and rate of events of interest before and after switching to Elocta® were compared.

RESULTS

For 545 patients, with mean age (standard deviation [SD]) 25.4 (17.8) years, Elocta® was the most used treatment. Bleeding events and articular non-bleeding events leading to hospitalization occurred in 15.4% and 13.9% of patients, respectively, and 9.9% of patients had surgeries or procedures related to haemophilic arthropathy. The mean (SD) FVIII product consumption was 344 (93) IU/kg/month for extended half-life treatment, and 331 (98) IU/kg/month for standard half-life products. For the sub-cohort of 146 patients, bleeding events (SD) decreased from 0.32 (2.2) to 0.09 (0.42) events/patient/year (p = 0.227) after switching to Elocta®. There was no statistically significant difference in rates of factor consumption or articular non-bleeding events before and after initiation of Elocta®.

CONCLUSION

This study provides real-world insights that advance the understanding of treatment patterns and events of interest in patients with haemophilia A on prophylactic regimens in France.

Disease Burden, Clinical Outcomes, and Quality of Life in People with Hemophilia A without Inhibitors in Europe: Analyses from CHESS II/CHESS PAEDs

Introduction  Limited data relating to treatment burden, quality of life, and mental health burden of hemophilia A (HA) are currently available. Aim  To provide a comprehensive overview of unmet needs in people with HA (PwHA) using data generated from the Cost of Haemophilia in Europe: a Socioeconomic Survey-II (CHESS II) and CHESS in the pediatric population (CHESS PAEDs) studies. Methods  CHESS II and CHESS PAEDs are cross-sectional surveys of European males with HA or hemophilia B (HB) aged ≥18 and ≤17 years, respectively. Participants with FVIII inhibitors, mild HA, or HB were excluded from this analysis, plus those aged 18 to 19 years. Annualized bleeding rates (ABRs), target joints, and other patient-reported outcomes were evaluated. Results  Overall, 468 and 691 PwHA with available data for the outcomes of interest were stratified by hemophilia severity and treatment regimen in CHESS II and CHESS PAEDs, respectively. In these studies, 173 (37.0%) and 468 (67.7%) participants received FVIII prophylaxis, respectively; no participants received the FVIII mimetic emicizumab or gene therapy. ABRs of 2.38 to 4.88 were reported across disease severity and treatment subgroups in both studies. Target joints were present in 35.7 and 16.6% of participants in CHESS II and CHESS PAEDS; 43.8 and 23.0% had problem joints. Chronic pain was reported by a large proportion of PwHA (73.9% in CHESS II; 58.8% in CHESS PAEDs). Participants also reported low EQ-5D scores (compared with people without HA), anxiety, depression, and negative impacts on their lifestyles due to HA. Conclusions  These analyses suggest significant physical, social, and mental burdens of HA, irrespective of disease severity. Optimization of prophylactic treatment could help reduce the burden of HA on patients.

A post hoc comparative real-world analysis of HEAD-US score for joint health assessment of patients with severe haemophilia A and B in Spain

AIM

Joint damage due to haemarthrosis can be effectively monitored with point-of care ultrasound using the Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with US (HEAD-US) scoring system. A post hoc comparative analysis of the joint status of patients with severe haemophilia A (HA) or B (HB) was performed.

METHODS

The databases of two observational, cross-sectional studies that recruited patients with HA or HB from 12 Spanish centres were analysed to compare the status of the elbows, knees and ankles in patients with severe disease according to treatment modality. The HEAD-US score was calculated in both studies by the same trained operators.

RESULTS

Overall, 95 HA and 41 HB severe patients were included, with a mean age of 35.2 ± 11.8 and 32.7 ± 14.2 years, respectively. The percentage of patients who received prophylaxis, over on-demand (OD) treatment, was much higher in HA (91.6%) than in HB (65.8%) patients. With a similar number of target joints, the HEAD-US score was zero in 6.3% HA and 22.0% HB patients (p < .01), respectively. The HA population showed significantly worse HEAD-US scores. Whilst osteochondral damage occurred more frequently in patients OD or tertiary prophylaxis, our data suggest that articular damage is less prominent in primary/secondary prophylaxis, regardless of the type of haemophilia. These latter treatment modalities were also associated with a lower prevalence of synovial hypertrophy, particularly in HB patients.

CONCLUSION

This post hoc analysis indicates that joint status seems to be significantly influenced by haemophilia type (HA or HB) and treatment modality in these severe Spanish populations with severe disease. Continuing HEAD-US monitoring for the early detection and management of intra-articular abnormalities, as well as more efficiently tailored therapies should be warranted.

Health-related quality of life following valoctocogene roxaparvovec gene therapy for severe hemophilia A in the phase 3 trial GENEr8-1

BACKGROUND

Severe hemophilia A (HA) negatively impacts health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to analyze HRQOL in adult men with severe HA without inhibitors after valoctocogene roxaparvovec gene transfer in the phase 3 trial GENEr8-1.

METHODS

Participant-reported outcomes were the hemophilia-specific quality of life questionnaire for adults (Haemo-QOL-A), the EQ-5D-5L instrument, the Hemophilia Activities List (HAL), and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Hemophilia Specific (WPAI+CIQ:HS). Participants completed the questionnaires at baseline and through 104 weeks postinfusion with 6 × 1013 vg/kg of valoctocogene roxaparvovec. Scores were analyzed per participant characteristics and outcomes.

RESULTS

For 132 HIV-negative participants, mean change from baseline in Haemo-QOL-A Total Score met the anchor-based clinically important difference (CID: 5.5) by week 12; the mean (SD) increase was 7.0 (12.6) at week 104. At week 104, improvement in Consequences of Bleeding, Treatment Concern, Worry, and Role Functioning domain scores exceeded the CID (6). EQ-5D-5L Utility Index scores improved above the CID at week 52, but not at week 104. EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale and HAL scores increased from baseline to week 104. Participants reported less activity and work impairment at week 104 than baseline. Participants with problem joints had lower mean baseline Haemo-QOL-A Total and domain scores than those without them, but improved over 104 weeks, except for 11 participants with ≥3 problem joints. Participants with 0 bleeds during the baseline prophylaxis period reported Haemo-QOL-A score improvements above the CID, including in the Consequences of Bleeding domain.

CONCLUSION

Valoctocogene roxaparvovec provided clinically meaningful HRQOL improvement for men with severe HA.

The frequency of complications in a cohort of patients diagnosed with hemophilia A and hemophilia B receiving prophylactic treatment in Colombia: A retrospective noninterventional study

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia A and B are disorders associated with the deficit of coagulation factors VIII and IX.

OBJECTIVE

Was to determine the incidence of complications in a cohort of patients diagnosed with moderate and severe hemophilia A or B under treatment in a specialized institution.

METHODS

A retrospective study of a cohort of patients with replacement therapy for hemophilia A or B, evaluating treatment and complications between January/2012 and July/2019. Sociodemographic, clinical and disease management-related variables were extracted from the medical records. Time to inhibitor development and rate associated with bleeding and hospitalizations were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 159 male patients were identified with hemophilia A (n = 140; 88.1%) and B (n = 19; 11.9%) with a mean follow-up of 5.9±2.3 years. The mean age was 23.6±16.1 years, hemophilia was reported as severe in 125 patients in hemophilia A (89.3%) and 13 patients in hemophilia B (68.4%). Primary prophylaxis was registered in 17.0% of patients, 44.7% secondary, and 38.3% tertiary, with recombinant factors (n = 84; 52.8%) followed by plasma derived factors (n = 75; 47.2%). The incidence of inhibitor development was 0.3 per 100 patients/year, with mean time to event of 509 days. The incidence of bleeding was 192 per 100 patients/year, especially at the joint (n = 99; 62.3%) and muscle (n = 25; 15.7%) level. The incidence of hospitalization was 3.7 per 100 patients/year.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common complication was joint bleeding which was expected in this type of patients. Low proportion of patients developed factor inhibitors during the follow up.

Bleeding pattern and consumption of factor VIII concentrate in adult patients with haemophilia A without inhibitors in the Czech Republic between 2013 and 2021 (Czech National Haemophilia Programme registry data)

The manuscript provides an overview of treatment and its changes in adult patients with haemophilia A without inhibitors in the Czech Republic between 2013 and 2021 using data from the registry of the Czech National Haemophilia Programme (CNHP). Over a 9-year period, we focused on the reduction in the annual bleeding rate (ABR), joint bleeding rate (AJBR) and factor VIII consumption when patients with severe haemophilia A switched from on-demand treatment to prophylaxis. The ABR and AJBR include both patient-reported home treatment and treated hospitalisation episodes. All adult patients with severe haemophilia A were categorised into three groups according to the therapeutic regimen. The first group was patients on prophylaxis during the follow-up period, the second group consisted of patients on on-demand treatment, and the third group was patients who received both treatment regimens during follow-up. With an increase in the proportion of patients with severe haemophilia A on prophylaxis from 37 to 74% between 2013 and 2021, the ABR for all patients with severe haemophilia A decreased approximately 6.9-fold, and the AJBR decreased 8.7-fold. Expectedly, the factor consumption increased by approximately 68.5%. In the group of patients with severe haemophilia A who had switched from an on-demand to a prophylactic regimen, the total number of bleeding events decreased 3.5-fold, and the number of joint bleeding episodes decreased 3.9-fold. Factor VIII consumption increased by 78.4%. Our study supports a previously reported positive effect of prophylaxis on bleeding control. We believe that the substantial improvement in ABR justifies the increased treatment costs.

Phase 3 Trial of Concizumab in Hemophilia with Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Concizumab is an anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor monoclonal antibody designed to achieve hemostasis in all hemophilia types, with subcutaneous administration. A previous trial of concizumab (explorer4) established proof of concept in patients with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors.

METHODS

We conducted the explorer7 trial to assess the safety and efficacy of concizumab in patients with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:2 ratio to receive no prophylaxis for at least 24 weeks (group 1) or concizumab prophylaxis for at least 32 weeks (group 2) or were nonrandomly assigned to receive concizumab prophylaxis for at least 24 weeks (groups 3 and 4). After a treatment pause due to nonfatal thromboembolic events in three patients receiving concizumab, including one from the explorer7 trial, concizumab therapy was restarted with a loading dose of 1.0 mg per kilogram of body weight, followed by 0.2 mg per kilogram daily (potentially adjusted on the basis of concizumab plasma concentration as measured at week 4). The primary end-point analysis compared treated spontaneous and traumatic bleeding episodes in group 1 and group 2. Safety, patient-reported outcomes, and pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of 133 enrolled patients, 19 were randomly assigned to group 1 and 33 to group 2; the remaining 81 were assigned to groups 3 and 4. The estimated mean annualized bleeding rate in group 1 was 11.8 episodes (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.0 to 19.9), as compared with 1.7 episodes (95% CI, 1.0 to 2.9) in group 2 (rate ratio, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.29]; P<0.001). The overall median annualized bleeding rate for patients receiving concizumab (groups 2, 3, and 4) was 0 episodes. No thromboembolic events were reported after concizumab therapy was restarted. The plasma concentrations of concizumab remained stable over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors, the annualized bleeding rate was lower with concizumab prophylaxis than with no prophylaxis. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; explorer7 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04083781.).

Prophylaxis with a recombinant factor VIII Fc in hemophilia A: long-term follow-up on joint health, efficacy, and safety from phase 3 studies in children and adults

Background

Recurrent joint bleeds are a major cause of morbidity in severe hemophilia. Prophylaxis with efmoroctocog alfa (a recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein, [rFVIIIFc]) has demonstrated benefits beyond bleed control, including joint health maintenance.

Objectives

To assess long-term efficacy and safety of rFVIIIFc prophylaxis in severe hemophilia A in phase 3 pivotal (A-LONG/Kids A-LONG) and extension (ASPIRE) studies.

Methods

Longitudinal analysis included pooled data from A-LONG/Kids A-LONG and ASPIRE. Subgroup analyses investigated outcomes in modified Hemophilia Joint Health Score or Hemophilia Joint Health Score and target joints in subjects with 4 to 5 years follow-up on individualized prophylaxis (IP), and those with the highest annualized bleeding rate (ABR) quartile during Year 1 of IP.

Results

Overall, rFVIIIFc consumption remained stable and low ABRs were maintained, with a median treatment duration of 4.2/3.4 years in subjects from A-LONG/Kids A-LONG, respectively. Median overall ABR also remained low (1.0-2.0) in subjects on IP for 4 to 5 years. Sustained improvements in modified Hemophilia Joint Health Score or Hemophilia Joint Health Score were demonstrated over a median follow-up of 3.7 years. In subjects from A-LONG/Kids A-LONG, 99.6% (n = 234)/100% (n = 9) of evaluable baseline target joints were resolved, with no recurrence in 95%/100% of target joints. In IP subjects within the highest ABR quartile in Year 1, continued improvements were observed over a median follow-up of 4.3 years in ABR and joint health, without increased factor consumption. No inhibitors or treatment-related serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusion

Previously treated subjects of all ages receiving long-term prophylaxis with rFVIIIFc had sustained clinical benefits, including improved joint health and low ABR.

Long-term outcomes of prophylaxis with a recombinant factor VIII Fc or recombinant factor IX Fc in patients with hemophilia previously treated on demand

Background

Prophylactic factor replacement therapy is recommended over on-demand treatment for preserving long-term joint health in hemophilia. Extended half-life products, including efmoroctocog alfa/eftrenonacog alfa (recombinant factor VIII [FVIII]/FIX Fc fusion proteins; herein rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc), have the potential to reduce treatment burden with less frequent administration and improve bleed prevention.

Objectives

We report post hoc data from patients with hemophilia A or B (HA/HB) who switched from prestudy on-demand FVIII/FIX to rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis at the start of A-LONG/B-LONG or start of/during ASPIRE/B-YOND phase 3 studies.

Methods

Patients with ≥6 months rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis were enrolled. Treatment exposure, dosing, annualized bleeding rates, joint health, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes were assessed. Results were also stratified by age.

Results

Sixty-seven patients with HA and 50 with HB were analyzed; ≥60% were from regions outside Europe/North America, predominately those aged 12 to ‍25 years. No subjects returned to on-demand treatment postswitch.After switch to rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis, median annualized bleeding rates were reduced and sustained at low levels with stable factor usage across age groups (median treatment duration: 4.8/3.6 years). HRQoL outcomes improved for all ages; most pronounced changes were in the sports and leisure and physical health domains. After switch to rFVIIIFc prophylaxis, total modified Hemophilia Joint Health Score and joints with pain decreased in 64.6% and 29.2% of patients with HA. Insufficient data from patients with HB limited joint health evaluation of rFIXFc.

Conclusions

Findings add to existing evidence and demonstrate the clinical and HRQoL benefits of switching patients from on-demand treatment to rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis.

DosEmi study protocol: a phase IV, multicentre, open-label, crossover study to evaluate non-inferiority of pharmacokinetic-guided reduced dosing compared with conventional dosing of emicizumab in people with haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Emicizumab effectively prevents bleeding in people with haemophilia A (PwHA), but is a burden for national healthcare budgets and consequently may limit access. According to the drug label, dosing of emicizumab is based on body weight with fixed intervals of 7, 14 or 28 days, which leads to mean plasma concentrations of 55 µg/mL (SD 15 µg/mL). However, a moderate variability of concentrations and a minimal effective concentration of 30 µg/mL have been suggested in studies. Therefore, a dose of emicizumab that targets a trough concentration of 30 µg/mL is hypothesised to be equally effective as conventional dosing in the prevention of bleeding.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We designed a phase IV, multicentre, open-label, crossover study to evaluate non-inferiority of bleed control of ≥6 months on conventional dosing in comparison to ≥6 months on dose intervention. This dose intervention consists of reducing the dose of emicizumab to target a trough concentrations of 30 µg/mL using individual pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. Ninety-five PwHA aged >1 years who received conventional dosing of emicizumab for ≥12 months with good bleeding control during the last 6 months will be recruited from all Dutch haemophilia treatment centres. The study is powered to detect a clinically relevant decrease (risk difference) of 15% in the proportion of patients without treated bleeds during follow-up. Secondary endpoints are spontaneous joint or muscle bleeds, and annualised treated bleeding rates (using negative binomial regression). Cost-effectivity between conventional dosing and individualised PK-guided dosing of emicizumab will be compared.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The DosEmi study was approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee NedMec of the University Medical Center of Utrecht, The Netherlands. Study results will be communicated through publications in international scientific journals and presentations at (inter)national conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

EUCTR2021-004039-10-NL at https://trialsearch.who.int.

PROTOCOL VERSION

V.4.1 on 28 October 2022 (DosEmi protocol_V4.1; NL81112.041.22).

The hidden joint in children with haemophilia on prophylaxis

Prophylaxis is the gold standard treatment for children with haemophilia (CWH). MRI studies revealed joint damage, even with this treatment; this suggests the presence of subclinical bleeding. In the case of children with haemophilia, it is relevant to detect early signs of joint damage, as this allows the medical team to provide the appropriate treatment and follow-up, in order to avoid arthropathy development and its consequences. The aim of this study is to detect the hidden joint in children with haemophilia on prophylaxis (CWHP) and analyse, by age group, which joint is the most affected. We define the hidden joint in CWH on prophylaxis as the joint that presents joint damage secondary to repetitive bleeding episodes and is detected in the joint evaluation, despite being asymptomatic or with mild symptoms. It is most commonly caused by repetitive subclinical bleeding.

METHODS

This was an observational, analytical, cross-sectional study of 106 CWH on prophylaxis treated in our centre. Patients were divided according to age and type of treatment. Joint damage was defined as a HEAD-US score ≥ 1.

RESULTS

Patients' median age was 12 years. All had severe haemophilia. The median age of onset of prophylaxis was 2.7. Forty-seven (44.3 %) patients received primary prophylaxis (PP) and 59 (55.7 %), secondary prophylaxis. Six hundred and thirty-six joints were analysed. Type of prophylaxis and joint involvement showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.001). However, patients on PP had a greater number of damaged joints at older ages. Twenty-two % (140) of the joints scored ≥1 on HEAD-US. Cartilage was most frequently involved, followed by synovitis, and bone damage. We observed a greater frequency and degree of arthropathy in subjects aged 11 and above. Sixty (12.7 %) joints showed a HEAD-US score ≥ 1, with no history of bleeding. The ankle was the most affected joint, representing the hidden joint according to our definition.

CONCLUSION

Prophylaxis is the best treatment for CWH. However, symptomatic or subclinical joint bleeding may occur. The routine evaluation of joint health is relevant, particularly, of the ankle. In our study, early signs of arthropathy according to age and type of prophylaxis were detected by HEAD-US.

Long-term efficacy and safety of subcutaneous concizumab prophylaxis in hemophilia A and hemophilia A/B with inhibitors

Despite current treatments, there remains an unmet need for patients with hemophilia. The main parts of two phase 2 trials established clinical proof-of-concept for once-daily, subcutaneous concizumab prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A/B with inhibitors (HAwI/HBwI; explorer4) and severe hemophilia A without inhibitors (HA; explorer5,). Here, we present results from extension parts of these trials, included to evaluate longer-term safety and efficacy. Both trials included main (≥24 weeks) and extension parts (52-102 weeks), with patients receiving 0.15 mg/kg concizumab with potential dose escalation to 0.20 or 0.25 mg/kg if they experienced ≥3 treated spontaneous bleeds within 12 weeks. Endpoints included annualized bleeding rate (ABR), adverse events (AEs), and anti-drug antibody (ADA) occurrence. Thromboembolic events were AEs of special interest. Thirty-six patients with HA, 15 with HAwI and 10 with HBwI were exposed to concizumab. Estimated ABRs during the main+extension parts at last dose level were 4.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.2-7.2) and 6.4 (95% CI: 4.1-9.9) in explorer4 and explorer5, respectively (spontaneous ABRs were 1.8 [95% CI: 1.2-2.6] and 2.1 [95% CI: 1.3-3.3]). Most AEs were mild, with no deaths, events leading to withdrawal or thromboembolic events. ADAs developed in 25% of patients and were low titer and transient with no observed clinical effect in most cases. Results of the main+extension parts of these trials were consistent with the main parts. Ongoing phase 3 trials will further evaluate concizumab as a once-daily, subcutaneous treatment across hemophilia subtypes. Trials registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03196284; NCT03196297).

IDELVION: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data

Hemophilia B is a bleeding disorder caused by a deficiency of coagulation factor IX (FIX). Treatment with FIX replacement products can increase FIX activity levels to minimize or prevent bleeding events. However, frequent dosing with standard-acting FIX products can create a high treatment burden. Long-acting products have been developed to maintain bleed protection with extended dosing intervals. Recombinant factor IX–albumin fusion protein (rIX-FP) is a long-acting product indicated for the treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding events and perioperative management in adult and pediatric patients. This review outlines data from all previously treated patients in the Prophylaxis and On-Demand Treatment using Longer Half-Life rIX-FP (PROLONG-9FP) clinical trial program and summarizes real-world data evaluating the use of rIX-FP in routine clinical practice. In the PROLONG-9FP program, rIX-FP demonstrated effective hemostasis in all patients at dose regimens of up to 21 days in patients aged ≥ 18 years and up to 14 days in patients aged < 12 years. rIX-FP has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and an excellent safety and tolerability profile. Extended dosing intervals with rIX-FP led to high levels of adherence and reduced consumption compared with other FIX therapies. Data from real-world practice are encouraging and reflect the results of the clinical trials.

Global seroprevalence of pre-existing immunity against AAV5 and other AAV serotypes in people with hemophilia A

Adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated gene therapy may provide durable protection from bleeding events and reduce treatment burden for people with hemophilia A (HA). However, pre-existing immunity against AAV may limit transduction efficiency and hence treatment success. Global data on the prevalence of AAV serotypes are limited. In this global, prospective, noninterventional study, we determined the prevalence of pre-existing immunity against AAV2, AAV5, AAV6, AAV8, and AAVrh10 among people ≥12 years of age with HA and residual FVIII levels ≤2 IU/dL. Antibodies against each serotype were detected using validated, electrochemiluminescent-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. To evaluate changes in antibody titers over time, 20% of participants were retested at 3 and 6 months. In total, 546 participants with HA were enrolled at 19 sites in 9 countries. Mean (standard deviation) age at enrollment was 36.0 (14.87) years, including 12.5% younger than 18 years, and 20.0% 50 years of age and older. On day 1, global seroprevalence was 58.5% for AAV2, 34.8% for AAV5, 48.7% for AAV6, 45.6% for AAV8, and 46.0% for AAVrh10. Considerable geographic variability was observed in the prevalence of pre-existing antibodies against each serotype, but AAV5 consistently had the lowest seroprevalence across the countries studied. AAV5 seropositivity rates were 51.8% in South Africa (n = 56), 46.2% in Russia (n = 91), 40% in Italy (n = 20), 37.2% in France (n = 86), 26.8% in the United States (n = 71), 26.9% in Brazil (n = 26), 28.1% in Germany (n = 89), 29.8% in Japan (n = 84), and 5.9% in the United Kingdom (n = 17). For all serotypes, seropositivity tended to increase with age. Serostatus and antibody titer were generally stable over the 6-month sampling period. As clinical trials of AAV-mediated gene therapies progress, data on the natural prevalence of antibodies against various AAV serotypes may become increasingly important.

Twelve-month prevalence of haemarthrosis and joint disease using the Haemophilia Joint Health score: evaluation of the UK National Haemophilia Database and Haemtrack patient reported data: an observational study

OBJECTIVES

To report the 12-month prevalence of joint bleeds from the National Haemophilia Database (NHD) and Haemtrack, a patient-reported online treatment diary and concurrent joint disease status using the haemophilia joint health score (HJHS) at individual joint level, in children and adults with severe haemophilia A and B (HA/HB) without a current inhibitor.

DESIGN

A 2018 retrospective database study of NHD from which 2238 cases were identified, 463 patients had fully itemised HJHS of whom 273 were compliant in recording treatment using Haemtrack.

SETTING

England, Wales and Scotland, UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Children (<18 years) and adults (≥18 years) with severe HA and HB (factor VIII/factor IX, <0.01 iu/mL) without a current inhibitor.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES

Prevalence of joint haemarthrosis and concurrent joint health measured using the HJHS.

RESULTS

The median (IQR) age of children was 10 (6-13) and adults 40 (29-50) years. Haemarthrosis prevalence in HA/HB children was 33% and 47%, respectively, and 60% and 42%, respectively, in adults. The most common site of haemarthrosis in children was the knee in HA and ankle in HB. In adults, the incidence of haemarthrosis at the ankles and elbows was equal. The median total HJHS in HA/HB children was 0 and in adults with HA/HB, were 18 and 11, respectively. In adults with HA/HB, the median ankle HJHS of 4.0 was higher than the median HJHS of 1.0 for both the knee and elbow.

CONCLUSION

Despite therapeutic advances, only two-thirds of children and one-third of adults were bleed-free, even in a UK cohort selected for high compliance with prophylaxis. The median HJHS of zero in children suggests joint health is relatively unaffected during childhood. In adults, bleed rates were highest in ankles and elbows, but the ankles led to substantially worse joint health scores.

Clinical, humanistic, and economic burden of severe haemophilia B in adults receiving factor IX prophylaxis: findings from the CHESS II real-world burden of illness study in Europe

BACKGROUND

Real-world studies of the burden of severe haemophilia B in the context of recent therapeutic advances such as extended half-life (EHL) factor IX (FIX) products are limited. We analysed data from the recent CHESS II study to better understand the clinical, humanistic, and economic burden of severe haemophilia B in Europe. Data from male adults with severe haemophilia B receiving prophylaxis were analysed from the retrospective cross-sectional CHESS II study conducted in Germany, France, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom. Inhibitors were exclusionary. Patients and physicians completed questionnaires on bleeding, joint status, quality of life, and haemophilia-related direct and indirect costs (2019-2020). All outcomes were summarised using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 75 CHESS II patients were eligible and included; 40 patients (53%) provided self-reported outcomes. Mean age was 36.2 years. Approximately half the patients were receiving EHL versus standard half-life (SHL) prophylaxis (44% vs 56%). Most patients reported mild or moderate chronic pain (76%) and had ≥ 2 bleeding events per year (70%), with a mean annualised bleed rate of 2.4. Mean annual total haemophilia-related direct medical cost per patient was €235,723, driven by FIX costs (€232,328 overall, n = 40; €186,528 for SHL, €290,620 for EHL). Mean annual indirect costs (€8,973) were driven by early retirement or work stoppage due to haemophilia. Mean quality of life (EQ-5D) score was 0.67.

CONCLUSIONS

These data document a substantial, persistent real-world burden of severe haemophilia B in Europe. Unmet needs persist for these patients, their caregivers, and society.

Real-World Rates of Bleeding, Factor VIII Use, and Quality of Life in Individuals with Severe Haemophilia A Receiving Prophylaxis in a Prospective, Noninterventional Study

Regular prophylaxis with exogenous factor VIII (FVIII) is recommended for individuals with severe haemophilia A (HA), but standardised data are scarce. Here, we report real-world data from a global cohort. Participants were men ≥18 years old with severe HA (FVIII ≤ 1 IU/dL) receiving regular prophylaxis with FVIII. Participants provided 6 months of retrospective data and were prospectively followed for up to 12 months. Annualised bleeding rate (ABR) and FVIII utilisation and infusion rates were calculated. Differences between geographic regions were explored. Of 294 enrolled participants, 225 (76.5%) completed ≥6 months of prospective follow-up. Pre-baseline and on-study, the median (range) ABR values for treated bleeds were 2.00 (0–86.0) and 1.85 (0–37.8), respectively; the median (range) annualised FVIII utilisation rates were 3629.0 (1008.5–13541.7) and 3708.0 (1311.0–14633.4) IU/kg/year, respectively; and the median (range) annualised FVIII infusion rates were 120.0 (52.0–364.0) and 122.4 (38.0–363.8) infusions/year, respectively. The median (range) Haemo-QoL-A Total Score was 76.3 (9.4–100.0) (n = 289), ranging from 85.1 in Australia to 67.7 in South America. Physical Functioning was the most impacted Haemo-QoL-A domain in 4/6 geographic regions. Despite differences among sites, participants reported bleeding requiring treatment and impaired physical functioning. These real-world data illustrate shortcomings associated with FVIII prophylaxis for this global cohort of individuals with severe HA.

Pharmacokinetics and Associated Efficacy of Emicizumab in Humans: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Emicizumab is an effective new treatment option for people with hemophilia A (PwHA). The approved dosing regimens are based on body weight, without the necessity for laboratory monitoring. This assumes a clear dose-concentration-response relationship, with acceptable variability due to factors other than body weight. To investigate this assumption, a systematic review on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and associated efficacy of emicizumab in humans was conducted.

METHODS

The EMBASE, Pubmed and CENTRAL databases were systematically searched to November 2020 to identify studies on the PK data of emicizumab in humans. Data on the study, population, PK and efficacy (annualized bleeding rate of treated [joint] bleeds) were extracted and synthesized, and exposure effects modeling was performed using non-linear least squares regression in a maximum effect (Emax) model.

RESULTS

The 15 included studies reported on data for 140 volunteers and 467 PwHA, including children (0 to <12 years) and adolescents and adults (≥12 years), both with and without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors. Emicizumab demonstrated dose-linear PK. The interindividual variability of trough concentrations was moderate (32%) and was similar across various subgroups, such as FVIII inhibitor status, age group and dosing interval. The control of bleeds did not further improve above emicizumab concentrations of 30 µg/mL, potentially enabling lower dosing in a substantial proportion of PwHA.

CONCLUSION

This review supports body weight-based dosing, although individualized monitoring of emicizumab concentrations may allow for more cost-effective dosing.

Clinical and ultrasound evaluation of patients with haemophilia on prophylaxis

INTRODUCTION

Primary prophylaxis is the current gold standard in haemophilia care for the prevention of bleeding and ensuing joint damage. Early detection of joint bleeding, whether symptomatic or subclinical, preferably during childhood, helps prevent joint deterioration and subsequent disability. The aim of this study is to evaluate the level of agreement between the Haemophilia Joint Health Score and the Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound tools in children with severe haemophilia on primary and secondary prophylaxis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients were followed up regularly at our centre. Elbows, knees and ankles were evaluated by physical examination using the Haemophilia Joint Health Score 2.1 (HJHS 2.1), and by ultrasound with HEAD-US score.

RESULTS

A total of 80 children with haemophilia on prophylaxis were included in this study. Mean age was 10.8 years (range 4-18). We evaluated 480 joints, of which 423 (88.1%) were concordant with both tools, whereas 57 (11.9%) were discordant; 377 (78.5%) joints scored 0 on HJHS, 370 (77%) on HEAD-US and 345 (72%) on both tools. The overall Kappa concordance coefficient was .656. For elbows, knees and ankles the respective values were .783, .522 and .589. For HJHS scores greater than 3, all joints scored ≥1 on HEAD-US.

CONCLUSION

HJHS and HEAD-US are used to assess joint health in children with haemophilia on prophylaxis. In this study, the level of agreement between both tools was consistent with literature values only for the elbow joint.

Clinical, humanistic, and economic burden of severe hemophilia B in the United States: Results from the CHESS US and CHESS US+ population surveys

BACKGROUND

Hemophilia B is a rare congenital bleeding disorder that has a significant negative impact on patients' functionality and health-related quality of life. The standard of care for severe hemophilia B in the United States is prophylactic factor IX replacement therapy, which incurs substantial costs for this lifelong condition. Accurate estimates of the burden of hemophilia B are important for population health management and policy decisions, but have only recently accounted for current management strategies. The 'Cost of Severe Hemophilia across the US: a Socioeconomic Survey' (CHESS US) is a cross-sectional database of medical record abstractions and physician-reported information, completed by hematologists and care providers. CHESS US+ is a complementary database of completed questionnaires from patients with hemophilia. Together, CHESS US and CHESS US+ provide contemporary, comprehensive information on the burden of severe hemophilia from the provider and patient perspectives. We used the CHESS US and CHESS US+ data to analyze the clinical, humanistic, and economic burden of hemophilia B for patients treated with factor IX prophylaxis between 2017 and 2019 in the US.

RESULTS

We conducted analysis to assess clinical burden and direct medical costs from 44 patient records in CHESS US, and of direct non-medical costs, indirect costs, and humanistic burden (using the EQ-5D-5L) from 57 patients in CHESS US+. The mean annual bleed rate was 1.73 (standard deviation, 1.39); approximately 9% of patients experienced a bleed-related hospitalization during the 12-month study period. Nearly all patients (85%) reported chronic pain, and the mean EQ-5D-5L utility value was 0.76 (0.24). The mean annual direct medical cost was $614,886, driven by factor IX treatment (mean annual cost, $611,971). Subgroup analyses showed mean annual costs of $397,491 and $788,491 for standard and extended half-life factor IX treatment, respectively. The mean annual non-medical direct costs and indirect costs of hemophilia B were $2,371 and $6,931.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of patient records and patient-reported outcomes from CHESS US and CHESS US+ provides updated information on the considerable clinical, humanistic, and economic burden of hemophilia B in the US. Substantial unmet needs remain to improve patient care with sustainable population health strategies.

Natural history study of factor IX deficiency with focus on treatment and complications (B-Natural)

INTRODUCTION

Haemophilia B (HB) is less well studied than haemophilia A (HA); despite similarities between the two inherited bleeding disorders, important differences remain that require further research.

AIM

B-Natural is a multi-centre, prospective, observational study of HB, designed to increase understanding of clinical manifestations, treatment, quality-of-life (QoL), inhibitor development, immune tolerance induction (ITI) outcome, renal function and create a biorepository for future investigations.

METHODS

Participants include sibling pairs/groups without a current/history of inhibitors and singletons or siblings with a current/history of inhibitors followed for six months. Demographics, medical, social history and treatment were recorded. A physical examination including joint range of motion (ROM) was performed; QoL was assessed. Samples were collected for F9 gene mutation, HLA typing, non-inhibitory antibodies and renal function testing.

RESULTS

Twenty-four centres enrolled 224 individuals from 107 families including 29 with current/history of inhibitors. Of these, 68, 30.4%, had severe (<1% FIX level of normal); 114, 50.9%, moderate (1%-5%); and 42, 18.8%, mild (>5-<40%) disease. At enrolment, 53.1% had 50 + exposure days to exogenous FIX. Comparison of joint scores showed significant (P < .05) differences between those with severe (with/without inhibitors), and those with moderate/mild disease. The majority with severe disease, 80.0% with current/history of inhibitors and 64.3% of those without, were treated with prophylaxis.

CONCLUSION

B-Natural provides data supporting an increased understanding of HB and its impact throughout life. The need for optimal disease control to normalize physical and psychosocial outcomes is underscored, and further analyses will contribute to an increased understanding of critical issues in HB.

Safety and efficacy of nonacog alfa for the treatment of haemophilia B in children younger than 6 years of age in a routine clinical care setting: the EUREKIX registry study

INTRODUCTION

European regulatory authorities request postmarketing safety and efficacy data for factor IX (FIX) products.

AIM

Collect additional clinical data from routine nonacog alfa use in children aged <6 years with haemophilia B.

METHODS

The EUREKIX registry included retrospective and prospective data collection phases. Safety was assessed via adverse drug reactions (ADRs)/adverse events (AEs) and events of special interest (ESIs) as the primary objective; efficacy was evaluated via annualised bleeding rates (ABRs).

RESULTS

The retrospective phase comprised 37 subjects. Of these, 25 had severe haemophilia B. One subject experienced 2 ADRs; another experienced 4 ESIs of hypersensitivity. Median ABR in subjects receiving a predominantly on-demand regimen (prophylaxis <50% of time; n = 11) was 2.0; median ABR was 3.8 in those receiving predominantly prophylactic treatment (prophylaxis ≥50% of time; n = 24). Joint bleeding was infrequent (median ABR, 0.4; n = 35). The prospective phase included 26 subjects, with 17 continuing from the retrospective phase. A total of 20 subjects had severe haemophilia B. Three subjects experienced 7 treatment-related AEs; 3 experienced 4 ESIs. Median ABR was 4.5 and 1.1 in subjects who received predominantly on-demand (n = 5) or prophylactic treatment (n = 19), respectively; the overall median ABR for joint bleeding events was 0.0.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, nonacog alfa treatment effectively controlled bleeding events, with no new safety signals identified. These data support the safety and efficacy of nonacog alfa in routine clinical settings in children aged <6 years.

Treatment patterns and bleeding outcomes in persons with severe hemophilia A and B in a real-world setting

The current standard of care treatment for severe hemophilia A and B (SHA and SHB) is the prophylactic intravenous replacement of coagulation factor VIII or IX (FVIII/FIX) to prevent spontaneous bleeding. Persons with hemophilia without prophylactic treatment receive therapy in case of bleeding, i.e., on demand. To assess treatment patterns, utilization of products, and bleeding outcomes in a real-world cohort of persons with SHA and SHB, defined as FVIII or FIX activity < 1%, data was retrospectively collected from hemophilia-specific patient diaries used for home treatment, medical records, and entries into the Austrian Hemophilia Registry from the year 2012 to 2017. Fifty-three male persons with SHA (n = 47) and SHB (n = 6) were included; 26 with SHA and 5 with SHB were on prophylaxis, 8 and 1 switched therapy regimen, and 13 and 0 received on-demand therapy. Persons on prophylaxis used a mean factor FVIII or FIX dose of 71.7 and 40.1 IU/kg/week. Median (IQR) annualized bleeding rates (ABR) in SHA were 28.0 (23.4-31.3) in the on-demand, 4.9 (1.6-13.5) in the prophylaxis group, and 3.0 (2.0-6.8) in the prophylactic group of SHB. Three persons with SHA had zero bleeds during the observation period. On-demand therapy and hepatitis B and C were associated with higher ABR but not age, weight, and HIV positivity. Bleeding rates and the proportion of on-demand therapy in persons with hemophilia were high in our real-world cohort. Further improvement is needed, which might be facilitated with the advent of factor products with extended half-life or non-factor therapies.

Model of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Emicizumab Prophylaxis Treatment for Persons with Hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Hemophilia A (HA) can result in bleeding events because of low or absent clotting factor VIII (FVIII). Prophylactic treatment for severe HA includes replacement FVIII infusions and emicizumab, a bispecific factor IXa- and factor X-directed antibody.

OBJECTIVE

To develop an economic model to predict the short- and long-term clinical and economic outcomes of prophylaxis with emicizumab versus short-acting recombinant FVIII among persons with HA in the United States.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to compare clinical outcomes and costs of emicizumab versus FVIII prophylaxis among persons with severe HA from U.S. payer and societal perspectives. Patients started prophylaxis at age 1 year in the base case. Mutually exclusive health states considered were "no arthropathy," "arthropathy," "surgery," and "death." Serious adverse events, breakthrough bleeds, and inhibitor development were simulated throughout the modeled time horizon. In addition to the prophylaxis drug costs, patients could incur other direct costs related to breakthrough bleeds treatment, serious adverse events, development of inhibitors, arthropathy, and orthopedic surgery. Indirect costs associated with productivity loss (i.e., missed work or disabilities) were applied for adults. Model inputs were obtained from the HAVEN 3 trial, published literature, and expert opinion. The model used a lifetime horizon, and results for 1 year and 5 years were also reported. Deterministic sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were conducted to assess robustness of the model.

RESULTS

Over a lifetime horizon, the cumulative number of all treated bleeds and joint bleeds avoided on emicizumab versus FVIII prophylaxis were 278.2 and 151.7, respectively. Correspondingly, arthropathy (mean age at onset: 12.9 vs. 5.4 years) and FVIII inhibitor development (mean age at development: 13.9 vs. 1.1 years) were delayed. Total direct and indirect costs were lower for emicizumab versus FVIII prophylaxis for all modeled time horizons ($97,159 vs. $331,610 at 1 year; $603,146 vs. $1,459,496 at 5 years; and $15,238,072 vs. $22,820,281 over a lifetime horizon). The sensitivity analyses indicated that clinical outcomes were sensitive to efficacy inputs, while economic outcomes were driven by the discount rate, dosing schedules, and treatments after inhibitor development. Results for moderate to severe patients were consistent with findings in the severe HA population.

CONCLUSIONS

The model suggests that emicizumab prophylaxis confers additional clinical benefits, resulting in a lower number of bleeding events and delayed onset of arthropathy and inhibitor development across all time assessment horizons. Compared with short-acting recombinant FVIII, emicizumab prophylaxis leads to superior patient outcomes and cost savings from U.S. payer and societal perspectives.

DISCLOSURES

Funding for this study was provided by Genentech. Raimundo and Patel are employees of Genentech and own stock or stock options. Zhou, Han, Ji, Fang, Zhong, and Betts are employees of Analysis Group, which received consultancy fees from Genentech for conducting this study. Mahajerin received consultancy fees from Genentech for work on this study. Portions of this research were presented as a poster at the 2018 American Society of Hematology Conference; December 1-4, 2018; San Diego, CA.

Cost of patients with hemophilia A treated with standard half-life or extended half-life FVIII in Spain

BACKGROUND

In a real-world analysis (RWA) conducted in the United States (US), median international units (IUs) of extended half-life (EHL) recombinant coagulation factor VIII (rFVIII) dispensed were 10% to 45% greater than standard half-life (SHL) rFVIII. The mean IUs of each rFVIII dispensed quarterly were obtained from two databases (N = 776).

METHODS

A probabilistic model in a 1-year time horizon was used in order to analyze the cost comparison of SHL and EHL rFVIII products in Spain. In this analysis, mean IUs were those of the RWA, and frequency of use and prices for each rFVIII were obtained from sales estimates based on Spanish sources (IQVIA; €, 2019).

RESULTS

Data showed an average annual savings per patient of €11,227 for SHL rFVIII versus EHL rFVIII products, with a savings probability of 75.5%. The results were stable in the sensitivity analyses. Not switching treatment from SHL to EHL rFVIII resulted in greater savings per patient (€53,078), with a savings probability of 99.9%. Considering the frequency of rFVIII dispensation in the US, annual savings per patient would increase to €16,350 in Spain, with a savings probability of 79.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

According to this model, use of SHL rFVIII versus EHL rFVIII products could lead to savings for the Spanish National Health System.

Assessing the potential cost-effectiveness of a gene therapy for the treatment of hemophilia A

Aim: Hemophilia A is a genetic, chronic disorder classified by deficient or defective coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) that puts those affected at risk for spontaneous bleeding episodes, which lead to joint damage and chronic pain over time. Currently, most severe hemophilia A patients are treated with prophylactic FVIII, which requires costly and frequent infusions and life-long adherence to medication. A gene therapy (valoctocogene roxaparvovec) is currently in development for the treatment of severe hemophilia A. This model assessed the potential cost-effectiveness of treating patients with valoctocogene roxaparvovec rather than prophylactic therapy.Materials and methods: We developed an individual-based, state-transition microsimulation model for assessing the likely cost-effectiveness of valoctocogene roxaparvovec compared to prophylactic FVIII. Men aged 30 with severe hemophilia A were modeled over a lifetime horizon, and costs were reported from the perspective of the United States health care system. Through microsimulation, patient-level heterogeneity was captured in starting weight, starting Pettersson score (PS), durability of valoctocogene roxaparvovec, and annual bleed rate (ABR).Results: The model projects that treatment with single-administration valoctocogene roxaparvovec would be cost-saving to people with hemophilia A at a price point comparable to other currently available gene therapy products due to its potential to reduce FVIII utilization, direct medical costs, lifetime bleeds, and accumulated joint damage.Limitations: The model relies upon evidence-based assumptions for clinical inputs due to limited data availability. Such uncertainty was mitigated by modeling heterogeneity across the population, specifically with regards to long-term gene therapy durability, lifetime bleed rates, and joint damage progression.Conclusion: Valoctocogene roxaparvovec was found to be cost-saving-on average by about $6.8 million per patient-and more effective than prophylactic therapy for treatment of hemophilia A. The comparative benefit of gene therapy was observed across a broad range of simulated patients that were representative of the real-world severe hemophilia A population.

Subcutaneous concizumab prophylaxis in hemophilia A and hemophilia A/B with inhibitors: phase 2 trial results

Results from the main parts (24 weeks) of 2 concizumab phase 2 trials are presented: explorer4 in hemophilia A (HA) or B (HB) with inhibitors (HAwI/HBwI) and explorer5 in HA. The trials aimed to evaluate the efficacy of daily subcutaneous concizumab prophylaxis (evaluated as annualized bleeding rate [ABR] at last dose level), with secondary objectives being safety and immunogenicity (assessed as number of adverse events [AEs] and antidrug antibodies [ADAs]). Patients received 0.15 mg/kg concizumab, with potential dose escalation to 0.20 and 0.25 mg/kg (if ≥3 spontaneous bleeding episodes within 12 weeks of concizumab treatment). Relevant pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters were assessed. Thirty-six HA, 9 HAwI, and 8 HBwI patients were exposed to concizumab. Most inhibitor patients (15 of 17; 88.2%) did not escalate the dose; all patients chose to continue to the extension phase of the trials. Clinical proof of concept for prevention of bleeding episodes was demonstrated in both trials. Estimated ABRs in HAwI and HBwI were lower vs HA: 3.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7; 5.3) and 5.9 (95% CI, 4.2; 8.5) vs 7.0 (95% CI, 4.6; 10.7), respectively. PK/PD results were as expected, with no difference between hemophilia subtypes for concizumab exposure, free tissue factor pathway inhibitor, thrombin generation, prothrombin fragment 1+2, and d-dimers. Concizumab was safe and well tolerated (no severe AEs, AE-related withdrawals, or thromboembolic events). Three patients had (very low to medium titer) ADA+ tests in each trial, with no observed clinical effect. These results support further development of concizumab as a daily prophylactic treatment in all hemophilia patients. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03196284 and #NCT03196297.

Burden of mild haemophilia A: Systematic literature review

Introduction

Although the clinical manifestations of severe haemophilia A (HA) are well studied, the challenges, if any, of living with mild HA are not clearly delineated to date.

Aim

To assess available evidence of clinical risks and societal/economic impacts of disease in adult patients with mild HA using a systematic literature review.

Methods

Prespecified study selection criteria were applied in a comprehensive literature search. Included studies varied in design and reported outcomes of interest for adults (≥13 years of age) with mild HA.

Results

Seventeen studies with a total of 3213 patients met eligibility criteria (published or presented in English, 1966‐2017). Most studies were observational, and the outcomes reported were too sparse and dissimilar to support a formal meta‐analysis. Mean annual bleeding rates ranged from 0.44 to 4.5 episodes per patient per year. Quality of life (QoL; SF‐36 General Health) was impacted compared to healthy controls. Health care costs and productivity were seldom assessed and no robust comparisons to healthy controls were available.

Conclusion

Quantifying outcomes for adult patients with mild HA remains challenging, with estimates of key QoL and cost data often based on small data sets and without comparison to population norms. Therefore, the clinical impact of mild haemophilia may be under‐represented and unmet needs may remain unaddressed. As paradigm‐changing therapies for HA emerge, stronger knowledge of mild HA can guide the development of care options that minimize burden and enhance the QoL for this segment of the haemophilia community, and for the haemophilia community in totality.

HAEMOcare: The First International Epidemiological Study Measuring Burden of Hemophilia in Developing Countries

Introduction  Optimizing hemophilia care remains challenging in developing countries. Burden-of-disease studies are important to develop strategies for improving hemophilia care.

Aim  The HAEMOcare study evaluated the factors contributing to hemophilia-related orthopedic disease burden in developing countries.

Methods  HAEMOcare was a noninterventional, cross-sectional, epidemiological study conducted in Algeria, India, Morocco, Oman, and South Africa. Male patients with severe hemophilia ( N  = 282) aged ≥6 years, without or with inhibitors, being treated on-demand for bleeding were included. Hemophilia-related orthopedic clinical and functional status was assessed using the Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS), radiological status with the Pettersson Score, and quality of life with the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L). Direct and indirect economic costs of hemophilia care were also calculated.

Results  Patients (mean [standard deviation, SD] age: 20.8 [10.6] years) experienced a mean annualized bleeding rate of 25.8. Overall mean (SD) HJHS and Pettersson score were 17.9 (12.8) and 15.0 (13.5), respectively; scores were similar between patients without or with inhibitors ( p  = 0.21 and 0.76, respectively). Approximately 70% of adults reported problems relating to pain/discomfort and mobility parameters in the EQ-5D-3L. Mean distance to a hemophilia treatment center (HTC) was 79.4 km. As expected, total costs of hemophilia were statistically significantly higher in patients with inhibitors versus without inhibitors ( p  = 0.002).

Conclusion  Inadequate access to HTCs and expert care, along with high bleeding rates, led to equivalent hemophilia-related orthopedic morbidity between hemophilia patients without and with inhibitors. HAEMOcare documented the economic and disease burdens associated with suboptimal hemophilia care in developing countries.

Design of a prospective observational study on the effectiveness and real-world usage of recombinant factor VIII Fc (rFVIIIFc) compared with conventional products in haemophilia A: the A-SURE study

INTRODUCTION

Haemophilia A is a rare bleeding disorder caused by coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency. This is treated with factor VIII, conventionally using products with a half-life of 8-12 hours typically administered every 2-3 days. Recombinant FVIII Fc (rFVIIIFc) represents a new generation of products with an extended half-life allowing higher FVIII levels and longer dosing interval. The efficacy and safety of rFVIIIFc have been established in clinical studies and several years of postmarketing use. However, there remains a need to compare treatment outcome with conventional products in routine clinical use.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A-SURE is an ongoing, non-interventional European study with the primary objective to compare the clinical effectiveness of rFVIIIFc with conventional factor products used for haemophilia A prophylaxis. Data covering a 24-month prospective period and a 12-month retrospective period will be collected. Three primary endpoints: bleeding rate, injection frequency and factor consumption will be used to evaluate treatment outcomes. Enrolment of 175 patients on rFVIIIFc and 175 on conventional products is planned. All eligible patients from participating centres will be invited to participate. Visits and treatments follow routine clinical practice. Bias will be reduced by patient matching for age at baseline and the last weekly prophylaxis dose of a conventional product prior to baseline. Propensity scores will be calculated based on prognostic factors and potential confounders assessed at baseline and adjusted for in the estimation of the treatment effect.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Study approval was obtained by local independent ethics committees and/or authorities, and informed consent from patients or their legal representative is a requirement for participation. Names of ethical committees and approval numbers are provided as supplementary information. The study results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and presented at scientific conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02976753, Pre-results.

Once-weekly prophylaxis with glycoPEGylated recombinant factor VIII (N8-GP) in severe haemophilia A: Safety and efficacy results from pathfinder 2 (randomized phase III trial)

Introduction

Turoctocog alfa pegol (N8‐GP) is a site‐specific, 40 kDa glycoPEGylated recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) product with an extended half‐life. The comprehensive main phase of the pivotal pathfinder 2 trial showed N8‐GP dosed every 4 days (Q4D) provided favourable safety and efficacy for preventing bleeds in 175 patients with haemophilia A.

Aim and methods

We investigated the safety and efficacy of N8‐GP prophylaxis when administered weekly (Q7D) for 24 weeks to patients with low bleeding rates in the pathfinder 2 extension trial. Patients (≥12 years) with ≤2 bleeds during the preceding 6 months of the pathfinder 2 main phase were eligible for randomization to receive N8‐GP 50 IU/kg Q4D or 75 IU/kg Q7D. Safety and efficacy endpoints were incidence of FVIII inhibitors and annualized bleeding rate (ABR), respectively.

Results

Fifty‐five of 143 (38.5%) patients on prophylaxis who continued into the extension phase were randomized to receive 50 IU/kg Q4D (n = 17) or 75 IU/kg Q7D (n = 38). Nine patients in the Q7D cohort reverted to 50 IU/kg Q4D. No inhibitors were detected. In both cohorts, >50% of patients experienced no bleeds. Median ABR for overall, joint, spontaneous, traumatic and muscle was 0.00 for both cohorts. Overall estimated success rate for treating bleeding episodes was 87.5%; 94.7% of bleeds were controlled with ≤2 injections.

Conclusions

Weekly N8‐GP was well tolerated and efficacious and may benefit selected “low bleeder” patients with haemophilia A.

A randomized trial of safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of concizumab in people with hemophilia A

Essentials explorer™3 was a double-blinded, multiple-dose escalation trial of subcutaneous concizumab. A pharmacodynamic relationship for unbound TFPI and thrombin generation was confirmed. No serious adverse events and no anti-drug antibodies were observed. explorer™3 data support further clinical development of concizumab in people with hemophilia. SUMMARY: Background Concizumab is a humanized mAb targeting tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), leading to enhanced thrombin generation (TG) potential. explorer™3 (NCT02490787) was a phase 1b, double-blind, multiple-dose escalation trial of subcutaneous concizumab in people with severe hemophilia A without inhibitors. Objectives The primary objective was to evaluate safety. Assessments of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and subcutaneous concizumab immunogenicity were secondary objectives. Patients/Methods Adverse events (AEs), clinical assessments and bleeding episodes were recorded. Plasma concizumab levels and unbound TFPI levels were measured with ELISAs; residual TFPI activity was measured with a chromogenic assay. Standardized assays were used to assess TG, D-dimer and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2 ) levels. explorer™3 was completed after investigation of three dose cohorts (0.25, 0.5 and 0.8 mg kg-1 , once every 4 days) had been completed. Twenty-four patients received 12 doses of concizumab or placebo in a 3 : 1 randomization over a 42-day period. Results No serious AEs and no anti-drug antibodies were observed. Fifty-four mild and two moderate AEs were observed in 19 patients. Concizumab exposure increased with dose in a non-linear manner, confirming target-mediated drug disposition. D-dimer and F1 + 2 levels were increased mostly in the highest dose cohort, in line with previous observations. The level of unbound TFPI decreased in a dose-dependent manner, and was accompanied by a residual TFPI activity decrease and an increase in peak TG. Although the trial was not powered to evaluate efficacy, a trend towards lower bleeding rates was observed in patients in the highest dose cohort. Conclusion explorer™3 data support further clinical development of concizumab for use in people with hemophilia, with or without inhibitors.

The benefits of prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia B

INTRODUCTION

The health benefits of prophylactic dosing regimens for clotting factor therapy in patients with hemophilia include reduced joint damage and improved quality of life; as such, prophylaxis is recommended in treatment guidelines. However, many patients with hemophilia B are treated on demand, and prophylaxis has been utilized less frequently than in hemophilia A. Areas covered: This review discusses the opportunities and evidence for prophylaxis in hemophilia B, in the context of treatment guidelines and with regard to factor IX (FIX) replacement therapies, including long-acting recombinant FIX (rFIX). Expert commentary: Long-acting rFIX concentrates may increase uptake of and adherence to prophylaxis regimens through attainment of higher trough levels with longer dosing intervals. In this new era of hemophilia B treatment, physicians may be able to achieve better clinical outcomes for their patients and reconsider treatment goals. Maintaining higher FIX trough levels will undoubtedly have long-term benefits for patients, such as preserving joint function. The long-acting rFIX concentrates support robust prophylaxis regimens and offer physician's flexibility in treating patients to best suit their needs, whether to enable an active lifestyle, to achieve higher trough levels for better bleed protection, or simply to decrease the burden of treatment by reducing injection frequency.

Focusing in on use of pharmacokinetic profiles in routine hemophilia care

BACKGROUND

Emergence of population pharmacokinetic models for prediction of individual pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles facilitates individualization of prescribed prophylactic therapy for patients with hemophilia A and B and may have a favorable impact on clinical outcomes and annual factor utilization. How providers approach the integration and application of these data into routine clinical practice is not clear.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the potential application of and barriers to incorporating PK profiles into current hemophilia prophylaxis decision making.

METHODS

A facilitated group discussion of hematologists practicing within the federally-supported United States Hemophilia Treatment Center Network was conducted. Separately, a group of parents of patients with severe hemophilia less than 18 years of age participated in a focus group on individualizing prophylactic factor regimens with the use of PK data.

RESULTS

Physician participants constructed a conceptual model for factors that determined their selection of hemophilia prophylaxis. These factors clustered in five groupings. When charged with creating a prophylaxis regimen for a specific clinical case including PK data, eight of nine providers generated a unique regimen. Parent focus group supported PK data use as they preferred data driven treatment decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinician application of PK data for prophylaxis decision making is heterogeneous. Prospective evaluation of the use of PK-tailored prophylaxis in routine care and its impact on patient outcomes is needed. Parents perceived that, while obtaining blood draws could be challenging, images of factor activity decay informed their decisions about physical activity timing and provided an opportunity for partnership and shared decision making with their provider.

Pharmacokinetic modelling and validation of the half-life extension needed to reduce the burden of infusions compared with standard factor VIII

INTRODUCTION

Currently, no universally accepted definition of extended half-life (EHL) recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) exists. Identifying the minimum half-life extension ratio required for a reduction in dosing frequency compared with standard rFVIII could enable a more practical approach to decisions around prophylaxis with EHL rFVIII.

AIM

To identify the half-life extension ratio required to decrease rFVIII dosing frequency by at least 1 day while maintaining the proportion of patients with plasma rFVIII levels above 1 IU/dL and without increasing the total weekly dose.

METHODS

A previously published population pharmacokinetic model for standard rFVIII was used to estimate the percentage of patients with factor VIII (FVIII) levels always >1 IU/dL using various benchmark regimens. Using modelling, dosing frequency was reduced while rFVIII half-life was extended until the percentage of patients with FVIII >1 IU/dL equalled that of the benchmark regimen.

RESULTS

Benchmark 3×/wk dosing totalling 100 IU/kg/wk of rFVIII resulted in 56.6% of patients with FVIII levels always >1 IU/dL. With 2×/wk dosing, totalling 80 or 90 IU/kg/wk, half-life extensions required to maintain 56.6% of patients at FVIII levels >1 IU/dL were 1.30 and 1.26, respectively. A half-life extension ratio of 1.33 was required to change dosing from every 48 hours to every 72 hours (both at 105 IU/kg/wk) while maintaining 92.8% of patients with FVIII >1 IU/dL.

CONCLUSION

Based on this investigation, EHL rFVIII products should have a minimum half-life extension ratio of 1.3 to provide a reduction in dosing frequency from 3× to 2×/wk compared with standard rFVIII products while maintaining the same minimum FVIII trough level.

Cost-utility analysis of life-long prophylaxis with recombinant factor VIIIFc vs recombinant factor VIII for the management of severe hemophilia A in Sweden

AIMS

Prophylaxis with recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) is the standard of care for severe hemophilia A in Sweden. The need for frequent injections with existing rFVIII products may, however, result in poor adherence to prophylaxis, leading to increased bleeding and long-term joint damage. Recombinant FVIIIFc (rFVIIIFc) is an extended half-life fusion protein which can offer prolonged protection and reduced dosing frequency. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-utility of prophylaxis with rFVIIIFc in severe hemophilia A from the perspective of the Swedish health system.

METHODS

A Markov model was built to estimate lifetime costs and benefits of prophylaxis with rFVIIIFc vs rFVIII products. Clinical outcomes were represented by annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and quality of life via disutility applied to bleeding events and injection frequency. Costs included the cost of FVIII for routine prophylaxis and bleed resolution. The pooled comparator was costed by weighting the cost of individual products by their market share.

RESULTS

In the base case, rFVIIIFc was dominant vs the pooled comparator. Savings of SEK 9.0 million per patient resulted from lower factor consumption for prophylaxis and bleed resolution. Fewer bleeds and reduced injection frequency yielded an estimated 0.59 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Results were sensitive to drug dosage and robust to variation in other parameters. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested a greater than 85% probability of rFVIIIFc being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 500,000 SEK/QALY.

LIMITATIONS

Due to unavailibilty of patient-level data, treatment benefit was based on a non-adjusted indirect comparison. Dosing and treatment outcomes were assumed to persist over the model duration in the absence of long-term outcome data.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that rFVIIIFc may be a cost-effective option for hemophilia A prophylaxis, generating greater quality of life and reduced costs for the Swedish payer compared to more frequently administered rFVIII alternatives.

Arteriovenous shunts as venous access in children with haemophilia

INTRODUCTION

Venous access is essential in patients with haemophilia for administration of factor concentrates. Peripheral venipuncture may be challenging, particularly in young children or during immune tolerance induction (ITI). Central venous access devices (CVADs) carry a significant risk for complications. An alternative for venous access is peripheral arteriovenous shunts (AVSs), but there is sparse documentation in the literature. The aim of this study was to document our experience with AVS over 12 years in 27 boys with severe haemophilia.

METHODS

For AVS creation, a subcutaneous vein is connected end-to-side with an artery at the wrist (Cimino) or at the forearm (Gracz shunt). Factor concentrates were substituted as for intermediate size surgery. To prevent shunt occlusion, heparin (5 units/kg/h) was given during the first 3 days.

RESULTS

Indications for AVS creation were prophylaxis start (n = 20) and ITI (n = 7). Age at shunt insertion was median 1.5 years (minimum 8 months; maximum 11.7 years). Shunt maturation was achieved within a median of 3 weeks after surgery (1.5 weeks; 18 weeks). Age when home treatment was established was median 2.1 years (9 months; 11.7 years). Four patients required AVS revisions due to stenosis, but 26 of 27 patients (96%) achieved good long-term shunt function. There were few other complications.

CONCLUSION

Arteriovenous shunts provide a good alternative to CVAD and carry a lower risk of complications. AVSs allow earlier start of prophylaxis and home therapy with an improved quality of life for patients and families.

The value of HEAD-US system in detecting subclinical abnormalities in joints of patients with hemophilia

BACKGROUND

Prevention of hemarthrosis is the key factor in the adequate management of people with hemophilia (PWH). If hemarthrosis occurs, early diagnosis of joint damage is essential to make personalized treatments. This study is aimed at gaining an understanding of the ability of point-of-care ultrasound (US) using the `Hemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound´ (HEAD-US) protocol to detect abnormalities in joints without history of hemarthrosis and clinically asymptomatic joints of PWH.

METHODS

The sample included 976 joints from 167 PWH (mean age 24.86 years). Data were collected from routine practice over a 3-year period and analyzed based on history of hemarthrosis and results of clinical (HJHS 2.1) and HEAD-US examinations.

RESULTS

In our series, 14% of patients exhibited HEAD-US signs of incipient arthropathy in joints with no history of bleeding and with a HJHS 2.1 score of 0. The most severely involved joint was the right ankle. Synovitis, articular cartilage and subchondral bone damage scores in joints with subclinical findings were slower than in joints with previous hemarthroses or HJHS 2.1 > 1 Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that HEAD-US is better than hemarthrosis records and the HJHS 2.1 scale in detecting the early signs of joint damage in PWH.

Australian multicentre study of current real-world prophylaxis practice in severe and moderate haemophilia A and B

INTRODUCTION

With the emergence of novel treatment products for haemophilia and an increasing focus on the benefits of pharmacokinetic driven individualized prophylaxis, robust national data with regard to current patterns of factor consumption and adherence are required.

AIM

To characterize current Australian practice with regard to use of prophylactic clotting factor infusions in patients with moderate or severe haemophilia A (HA) and haemophilia B (HB).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, non-interventional study utilizing Australian Bleeding Disorder Registry (ABDR) data collected over a 12 month period. Registered and consented patients with moderate or severe HA or HB without inhibitors were included.

RESULTS

A total of 718 HA (551 severe, 167 moderate) and 166 HB (87 severe, 79 moderate) patients were included. Regular prophylaxis was prescribed in 453 patients (82%) with severe HA, 42 patients (25%) with moderate HA, 66 patients (75%) with severe HB and 11 patients (14%) with moderate HB. Near universal prophylaxis was achieved in the paediatric subgroup. The mean weekly dose of factor VIII in severe HA was 84 international units/kg/wk (IU/kg/wk) vs 71 IU/kg/wk of factor IX in severe HB. Most patients on prophylaxis were treated ≥3 times/wk (HA) or 2 times/wk (HB). Non-adherence peaked in the 20-29 year age group. Older individuals on regular prophylaxis used more factor than was expected for their prescribed regimen.

CONCLUSION

Prophylaxis rates in severe haemophilia are comparable with other developed nations. The benefit of a national registry is demonstrable. Furthermore research into the underlying reasons for non-compliance in young adults with haemophilia is required.

Patient preferences in the treatment of hemophilia A: impact of storage conditions on product choice

OBJECTIVES

To gain insights into the usage of factor VIII (FVIII) products by patients diagnosed with moderate/severe hemophilia A, and to assess the impact and perceived importance of product storage.

METHODS

In this study, 200 patients diagnosed with moderate or severe hemophilia A across seven countries participated. Data were collected via a 30-minute, face-to-face interview in six countries and via a web-based survey in the seventh country. The questionnaire evaluated the effect of six features associated with FVIII products on the choice of the product; the structure and flow of data collection was designed to eliminate potential bias.

RESULTS

Two-thirds of the respondents were using recombinant FVIII products. Only 17% were generally dissatisfied with current FVIII products, whereas >40% of the respondents were dissatisfied with frequency of administration and storage issues when traveling. The majority noted restrictions in their daily activities, particularly travel and sports. Most of them (85%), stored their product in the refrigerator and of these, 88% believed that it should always be stored there. These patients were also less satisfied with the product overall, more concerned about storage temperature, more restricted in daily activities, and spent more time on preparation and injection compared with patients who stored their product at room temperature. Conjoint analysis revealed that origin of FVIII (plasma-derived vs recombinant) was the strongest driver of product choice among all respondents, followed by storage flexibility (temperature), reconstitution device, and administration frequency. In this study, we did not investigate the efficacy and safety of the product.

CONCLUSION

Not refrigerating FVIII products was associated with greater patient satisfaction and less restriction on daily activities. If efficacy and safety are unaffected, then storing FVIII at room temperature might have a positive impact on product choice. Few patients were aware that FVIII can be stored without refrigeration, suggesting that health care professionals who treat hemophilia should communicate this aspect to the patient (depending on the labeled option); this approach might offer patients greater flexibility when traveling and require less time for reconstitution.

AAV5-Factor VIII Gene Transfer in Severe Hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

Patients with hemophilia A rely on exogenous factor VIII to prevent bleeding in joints, soft tissue, and the central nervous system. Although successful gene transfer has been reported in patients with hemophilia B, the large size of the factor VIII coding region has precluded improved outcomes with gene therapy in patients with hemophilia A.

METHODS

We infused a single intravenous dose of a codon-optimized adeno-associated virus serotype 5 (AAV5) vector encoding a B-domain-deleted human factor VIII (AAV5-hFVIII-SQ) in nine men with severe hemophilia A. Participants were enrolled sequentially into one of three dose cohorts (low dose [one participant], intermediate dose [one participant], and high dose [seven participants]) and were followed through 52 weeks.

RESULTS

Factor VIII activity levels remained at 3 IU or less per deciliter in the recipients of the low or intermediate dose. In the high-dose cohort, the factor VIII activity level was more than 5 IU per deciliter between weeks 2 and 9 after gene transfer in all seven participants, and the level in six participants increased to a normal value (>50 IU per deciliter) that was maintained at 1 year after receipt of the dose. In the high-dose cohort, the median annualized bleeding rate among participants who had previously received prophylactic therapy decreased from 16 events before the study to 1 event after gene transfer, and factor VIII use for participant-reported bleeding ceased in all the participants in this cohort by week 22. The primary adverse event was an elevation in the serum alanine aminotransferase level to 1.5 times the upper limit of the normal range or less. Progression of preexisting chronic arthropathy in one participant was the only serious adverse event. No neutralizing antibodies to factor VIII were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The infusion of AAV5-hFVIII-SQ was associated with the sustained normalization of factor VIII activity level over a period of 1 year in six of seven participants who received a high dose, with stabilization of hemostasis and a profound reduction in factor VIII use in all seven participants. In this small study, no safety events were noted, but no safety conclusions can be drawn. (Funded by BioMarin Pharmaceutical; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02576795 ; EudraCT number, 2014-003880-38 .).

The haemtrack home therapy reporting system: Design, implementation, strengths and weaknesses: A report from UK Haemophilia Centre Doctors Organisation

INTRODUCTION

Haemtrack is an electronic home treatment diary for patients with inherited bleeding disorders, introduced in 2008. It aimed to improve the timeliness and completeness of patient-reported treatment records, to facilitate analysis of treatment and outcome trends. The system is easy to use, responsive and accessible.

METHODS

The software uses Microsoft technologies with a SQL Server database and an ASP.net website front-end, running on personal computers, android and I-phones. Haemtrack interfaces with the UK Haemophilia Centre Information System and the National Haemophilia Database (NHD). Data are validated locally by Haemophilia Centres and centrally by NHD. Data collected include as follows: treatment brand, dose and batch number, time/date of bleed onset and drug administration, reasons for treatment (prophylaxis, bleed, follow-up), bleed site, severity, pain-score and outcome.

RESULTS

Haemtrack was used by 90% of haemophilia treatment centres (HTCs) in 2015, registering 2683 patients using home therapy of whom 1923 used Haemtrack, entering >17 000 treatments per month. This included 68% of all UK patients with severe haemophilia A. Reporting compliance varied and 55% of patients reported ≥75% of potential usage. Centres had a median 78% compliance overall. A strategy for progressively improving compliance is in place. Age distribution and treatment intensity were similar in Haemtrack users/non-users with severe haemophilia treated prophylactically.

CONCLUSION

The Haemtrack system is a valuable tool that may improve treatment compliance and optimize treatment regimen. Analysis of national treatment trends and large-scale longitudinal, within-patient analysis of changes in regimen and/or product will provide valuable insights that will guide future clinical practice.

The cost of severe haemophilia in Europe: the CHESS study

BACKGROUND

Severe haemophilia is associated with major psychological and economic burden for patients, caregivers, and the wider health care system. This burden has been quantified and documented for a number of European countries in recent years. However, few studies have taken a standardised methodology across multiple countries simultaneously, and sought to amalgamate all three levels of burden for severe disease. The overall aim of the 'Cost of Haemophilia in Europe: a Socioeconomic Survey' (CHESS) study was to capture the annualised economic and psychosocial burden of severe haemophilia in five European countries. A cross-section of haemophilia specialists (surveyed between January and April 2015) provided demographic and clinical information and 12-month ambulatory and secondary care activity for patients via an online survey. In turn, patients provided corresponding direct and indirect non-medical cost information, including work loss and out-of-pocket expenses, as well as information on quality of life and adherence. The direct and indirect costs for the patient sample were calculated and extrapolated to population level.

RESULTS

Clinical reports for a total of 1,285 patients were received. Five hundred and fifty-two patients (43% of the sample) provided information on indirect costs and health-related quality of life via the PSC. The total annual cost of severe haemophilia across the five countries for 2014 was estimated at EUR 1.4 billion, or just under EUR 200,000 per patient. The highest per-patient costs were in Germany (mean EUR 319,024) and the lowest were in the United Kingdom (mean EUR 129,365), with a study average of EUR 199,541. As expected, consumption of clotting factor replacement therapy represented the vast majority of costs (up to 99%). Indirect costs are driven by patient and caregiver work loss.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the CHESS study reflect previous research findings suggesting that costs of factor replacement therapy account for the vast majority of the cost burden in severe haemophilia. However, the importance of the indirect impact of haemophilia on the patient and family should not be overlooked. The CHESS study highlights the benefits of observational study methodologies in capturing a 'snapshot' of information for patients with rare diseases.

Predicting the outcomes of using longer-acting prophylactic factor VIII to treat people with severe hemophilia A: a hypothetical decision analysis

Essentials No randomized trials have compared long-acting factor VIII (FVIII) with currently used products. A comparison was undertaken using a decision model to predict FVIII use and number of bleeds. In the base case, longer acting FVIII reduced factor use by 17% while resulting in similar bleeds. The value of longer acting FVIII will be largely determined by existing regimens and unit price. Click to hear Prof. Makris's presentation on new treatments in hemophilia SUMMARY: Background Recently, factor VIII (FVIII) products with longer half-lives, such as recombinant FVIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc), have become available. Use of longer-acting FVIII products will largely depend on effectiveness and cost; no direct evaluations have compared these parameters between conventional and longer-acting FVIII therapies. Objectives To present a hypothetical decision analysis, combining evidence from multiple sources to estimate bleeding frequency, resource use and cost of longer-acting prophylactic products, such as rFVIIIFc, vs. conventional recombinant FVIII (rFVIII). Patients/Methods The decision model used published pharmacokinetic parameters, bleeding frequency vs. time information below a 1-IU dL-1 FVIII trough level, and adherence. Prophylactic treatment scenarios were modelled for a hypothetical patient with severe hemophilia A (<1 IU/dL) receiving rFVIIIFc or rFVIII. Results Infusing twice weekly with rFVIIIFc 42.7 IU kg-1 per dose required less clotting factor than infusing every 56 h with rFVIII 33.75 IU kg-1 per dose; annual bleeding rates were similar. Base case analysis suggested that total FVIII costs were equated when rFVIIIFc cost 1.18 times more per IU than rFVIII, assuming similar adherence. Other modelled scenarios produced similar results, although differences in FVIII consumption were particularly sensitive to assumptions regarding frequency and dose of the rFVIII and rFVIIIFc regimens. For example, decreasing rFVIII from 33.75 IU kg-1 to 30 IU kg-1 per dose decreased the price factor to 1.05. Conclusions Longer-acting FVIII products may reduce FVIII consumption and infusion frequency without compromising hemostatic effect; this should be considered along with other factors (e.g. adherence and underlying FVIII regimen) when evaluating a suitable price for these agents.