Evaluation of a new commercial von Willebrand factor multimer assay

Investigation of von Willebrand factor multimer abnormalities before and after aortic valve replacement using the Hydragel-5 assay

BACKGROUND

Severe aortic stenosis (sAS) is associated with acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) by loss of high-molecular-weight multimers (HMWM) of von Willebrand factor (VWF), potentially resulting in perioperative bleeding. Analysis of VWF multimers remains challenging. Recently, the new, rapid Hydragel 5 assay has been developed, using electrophoretic protein separation for dividing VWF-multimers into low (LMWM), intermediate (IMWM), and HMWM, the hemostatically active part of VWF. Here, we evaluated its impact on predicting blood loss in presence of AVWS after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).

METHODS

We prospectively examined 52 patients (age: 68 ± 7 years; 54 % male) admitted to SAVR. They were divided in two groups (A: normal VWF, n = 28; B: abnormal VWF, n = 24, defined as VWF-activity/antigen (VWF:Ac/Ag)-ratio < 0.7 and/or HMWM loss). Blood samples and echocardiographic data were collected before, seven days and three months after SAVR. Blood loss and transfusions were recorded.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics and clinical data were similar in both groups. HMWM loss was present in 38.5 % of all patients. HMWM, the VWF:Ac/Ag- and HMWM/(IMWM+LMWM)-ratios were significantly decreased preoperatively in group B but normalized after SAVR. Bleeding, re-thoracotomy and transfusion rates were comparable. HMWM loss was inversely correlated with the peak aortic gradient (Pmax) and positively with the aortic valve area (AVA), while HMWM/(IMWM+LMWM)-ratio negatively correlated with the mean aortic gradient (Pmean).

CONCLUSION

HMWM and HMWM/(IMWM+LMWM)-ratio inversely correlate with severity of AS and normalize after SAVR. The Hydragel-5 assay's might be valuable for routine diagnostics to assess bleeding risk and postoperative normalization of AS and VWF abnormalities in SAVR patients.

The Role of the von Willebrand Factor Collagen-Binding Assay (VWF:CB) in the Diagnosis and Treatment of von Willebrand Disease (VWD) and Way Beyond: A Comprehensive 36-Year History

The von Willebrand factor (VWF) collagen binding (VWF:CB) assay was first reported for use in von Willebrand diagnostics in 1986, by Brown and Bosak. Since then, the VWF:CB has continued to be used to help diagnose von Willebrand disease (VWD) (correctly) and also to help assign the correct subtype, as well as to assist in the monitoring of VWD therapy, especially desmopressin (DDAVP). However, it is important to recognize that the specific value of any VWF:CB is predicated on the use of an optimized VWF:CB, and that not all VWF:CB assays are so optimized. There are some good commercial assays available, but there are also some "not-so-good" commercial assays available, and these may continue to give the VWF:CB "a bad reputation." In addition to VWD diagnosis and management, the VWF:CB found purpose in a variety of other applications, from assessing ADAMTS13 activity, to investigation into acquired von Willebrand syndrome (especially as associated with use of mechanical circulatory support or cardiac assist devices), to assessment of VWF activity in disease states in where an excess of high-molecular-weight VWF may accumulate, and lead to increased (micro)thrombosis risk (e.g., coronavirus disease 2019, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura). The VWF:CB turns 37 in 2023. This review is a celebration of the utility of the VWF:CB over this nearly 40-year history.

Evolution of Hemostasis Testing: A Personal Reflection Covering over 40 Years of History

There is no certainty in change, other than change is certain. As Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis celebrates 50 years of publication, I felt it appropriate to reflect on my own 40-year plus scientific career. My career in the thrombosis and hemostasis field did not start until 1987, but the subsequent 35 years reflected a period of significant change in associated disease diagnostics. I started in the Westmead Hospital "coagulation laboratory" when staff were still performing manual clotting tests, using stopwatches, pipettes, test tubes, and a water bath, which we transported to the hospital outpatient department to run our weekly warfarin clinic. Several hemostasis instruments have come and gone, including the Coag-A-Mate X2, the ACL-300R, the MDA-180, the BCS XP, and several StaR Evolution analyzers. Some instruments remain, including the PFA-100, PFA-200, the AggRAM, the CS-5100, an AcuStar, a Hydrasys gel system, and two ACL-TOP 750s. We still have a water bath, but this is primarily used to defrost frozen samples, and manual clotting tests are only used to teach visiting medical students. We have migrated across several methodologies in the 45-year history of the local laboratory. Laurel gel rockets, used for several assays in the 1980s, were replaced with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay assays and most assays were eventually placed on automated instruments. Radio-isotopic assays, used in the 1980s, were replaced by an alternate safer method or else abandoned. Test numbers have increased markedly over time. The approximately 31,000 hemostasis assays performed at the Westmead-based laboratory in 1983 had become approximately 200,000 in 2022, a sixfold increase. Some 90,000 prothrombin times and activated partial thromboplastic times are now performed at this laboratory per year. Thrombophilia assays were added to the test repertoires over time, as were the tests to measure several anticoagulant drugs, most recently the direct oral anticoagulants. I hope my personal history, reflecting on the changes in hemostasis testing over my career to date in the field, is found to be of interest to the readership, and I hope they forgive any inaccuracies I have introduced in this reflection of the past.

Von Willebrand Factor Multimer Analysis and Classification: A Comprehensive Review and Updates

Von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a multimeric glycoprotein with essential roles in primary hemostasis. Patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD), due to quantitative and/or qualitative defects of VWF usually experience mucocutaneous bleeding. Based on the laboratory results of VWF antigen, various VWF activities, factor VIII activity, and VWF multimer patterns, VWD can be categorized as type 1, 2, and 3 VWD. VWF multimer analysis by either manual or semi-automated electrophoresis and immunoblotting is a critical part of the laboratory testing to differentiate type 1, type 2 VWD, and subtypes of type 1 or 2 VWD. The multimer distribution patterns can also help to understand the underlying molecular mechanism of VWF synthesis, multimerization, and clearance defects in VWD. This review will cover VWF synthesis, multimerization, secretion, VWF multimer analysis, and VWF multimer interpretation of various types and subtypes of VWD.

Analysis of von Willebrand Disease in the "Heart of Europe"

Background  von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a genetic bleeding disorder caused by defects of von Willebrand factor (VWF), quantitative (type 1 and 3) or qualitative (type 2). The laboratory phenotyping is heterogenic making diagnosis difficult.

Objectives  Complete laboratory analysis of VWD as an expansion of the previously reported cross-sectional family-based VWD study in the Czech Republic (BRNO-VWD) and Slovakia (BRA-VWD) under the name “Heart of Europe,” in order to improve the understanding of laboratory phenotype/genotype correlation.

Patients and Methods  In total, 227 suspected VWD patients were identified from historical records. Complete laboratory analysis was established using all available assays, including VWF multimers and genetic analysis.

Results  A total of 191 patients (from 119 families) were confirmed as having VWD. The majority was characterized as a type 1 VWD, followed by type 2. Multimeric patterns concordant with laboratory phenotypes were found in approximately 83% of all cases. A phenotype/genotype correlation was present in 84% (77% type 1, 99% type 2, and 61% type 3) of all patients. Another 45 candidate mutations (23 novel variations), not found in the initial study, could be identified (missense 75% and truncating 24%). An exon 1–3 gene deletion was identified in 14 patients where no mutation was found by direct DNA sequencing, increasing the linkage up to 92%, overall.

Conclusion  This study provides a cross-sectional overview of the VWD population in a part of Central Europe. It is an addition to the previously published BRNO-VWD study, and provides important data to the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis/European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders VWD mutation database with identification of novel causal mutations.

Establishing reference intervals for von Willebrand factor multimers

Background

von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimers (VWF:MM) methodologies are technically difficult, laborious, time consuming, non-standardized and results vary between laboratories. A new semi automated VWF:MM assay is available for routine use (Sebia). Due to lack of reference values for VWF:MM fractions, results interpretation can be challenging in some cases. The aim of this study was to determine reference intervals for low molecular weight (LMWM), intermediate molecular weight (IMWM) and high molecular weight (HMWM) multimers.

Methods

By the international cooperation initiated between 4 countries (Estonia, Latvia, France, and USA) 131 samples of relatively healthy individuals were analyzed for VWF:MM (in total 51 males and 80 non-pregnant females aged 17-69 years). Reference intervals were calculated according to CLSI C28-A3 standard.

Results

The proposed reference intervals for VWF:MM were calculated for LMWM 10.4-22.5%, IMWM 22.6-37.6%, HMWM 45.6-66.6%. Age related differences were seen in IMWM and HMWM (p<0.001 and 0.038). There was no gender related difference observed. Geographically LMWM results of France were different from the other regions (p<0.05).

Conclusions

Quantification of VWF:MM fractions, in addition to qualitative assessment of VWF:MM patterns, has the potential to aid in differential diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) subtypes. The reference values calculated in this study can be used in future research to establish clinical decision limits.

Von Willebrand Factor Multimeric Assay in Acquired von Willebrand Disease Diagnosis: A Report of Experience from North Estonia Medical Centre

Objectives Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) is a rare and frequently underdiagnosed bleeding disorder with an unknown prevalence. The diagnosis of AVWS is made based on laboratory investigations and the presence of clinical symptoms. Evaluation and management of affected patients are complex due to the need for multiple laboratory assays.

Materials and Methods Here, we describe the clinical and laboratory data of seven patients with a diagnosis of AVWS. All patients met the criteria for AVWS based on laboratory findings, bleeding symptoms, and the absence of any previous history of a bleeding disorder.

Results In all cases, the laboratory findings, lack of bleeding anamnesis, and family history suggested the presence of AVWS. Von Willebrand factor multimeric analysis showed decreased high-molecular weight (HMW) multimers in six cases. Patients with lower HMW multimers experienced more severe bleeding complications.

Conclusions The diagnosis of AVWS is complex and requires extensive laboratory evaluation. Interdisciplinary collaboration and complex laboratory evaluations are of paramount importance for the early recognition of AVWS and optimal AVWS diagnosis as well as successful clinical management.

Evaluation of a new semi-automated Hydragel 11 von Willebrand factor multimers assay kit for routine use

Background

Accurate diagnosis and classification of von Willebrand disease (VWD) are essential for optimal management. The von Willebrand factor multimers analysis (VWF:MM) is an integral part of the diagnostic process in the phenotypic classification, especially in discrepant cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a new Hydragel 11VWF multimer assay (H11VW).

Methods

Analytical performance characteristics such as repeatability (intra-assay variability, in gel between track variation), reproducibility (inter-assay variability, between gel variation), sensitivity, EQA performance and differences between two commercially available VWF:MM kits (H5VW and H11VW) were analysed in healthy volunteers' plasmas using in-house prepared reference plasma.

Results

Repeatability and reproducibility results of H11VW demonstrated acceptable and equivalent performance with previously verified H5VW. Participation in EQA was successful. No statistically significant difference was detected between H5VW and H11VW kits for different fractions of multimers: LMWM p=0.807; IMWM p=0.183; HMWM p=0.774.

Conclusions

H11VW demonstrated acceptable analytical performance characteristics. H11VW kit conveniently offers a more significant number of samples on a single gel. H5VW and H11VW kits can be used in daily practice interchangeably.

Improving diagnosis of von Willebrand disease: Reference ranges for von Willebrand factor multimer distribution

BACKGROUND

Phenotypic von Willebrand disease (VWD) classification requires multiple tests including analysis of multimeric distributions von Willebrand factor (VWF) and evaluation of its structure. VWF multimer analysis is labor intensive, nonstandardized, and limited to specialized laboratories. A commercial semiautomatic assay, HYDRAGEL VW multimer assay (H5/11VWM, Sebia), has become available.

OBJECTIVES

Establishment of reference ranges for H5/11VWM to improve VWD classification.

METHODS

Implementation validation, establishment and validation of normal and pathological reference intervals (NRIs/PRIs), comparison with in-house method using 40 healthy volunteers and 231 VWD patients.

RESULTS

Qualitative and quantitative validation of NRI obtained sensitivity of 88% and 79%, respectively, for type 2. Comparison of the two methods showed an overall concordance of 86% with major conflicting results in all atypical 2B (n = 7) and 50% 2M-GPIb (n = 41) showing quantitative and qualitative multimeric loss, that was not detected with in-house method. We were able to use established PRIs, with 73% validity in type 2 cases, to distinguish individual type 2A subtypes (IIA, IIC, IID, IIE) from 2M and 2B.

CONCLUSION

H5/11VWM could be used for all clinical purposes because its reliability and its rapid and accurate diagnostic ability and reduced observer bias. Although H5/11VWM cannot evaluate triplet structures, we were able to define 2A subtypes by stripping back to the percentage of intermediate/high-molecular-weight multimers. H5/11HWM could be an efficient and widely available alternative for the "gold standard" technique.

Comparative assessment of von Willebrand factor multimers vs activity for von Willebrand disease using modern contemporary methodologies

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) is challenging due to heterogeneity of VWD and test limitations. Many von Willebrand factor (VWF) assays are utilized, including antigen (Ag), activity and multimer analysis. Activity assays include ristocetin cofactor using platelets (VWF:RCo) or other particles incorporating recombinant glycoprotein I ('VWF:GPIbR'), or other GPI binding assays using gain-of-function mutations ('VWF:GPIbM'), or collagen binding (VWF:CB).

AIM

To comparatively evaluate modern contemporary VWF activity assays vs VWF multimer analysis using modern contemporary methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Several VWF activity assays (VWF:RCo, VWF:GPIbR, VWF:GPIbM, VWF:CB) assessed (typically as a ratio against VWF:Ag) against a new semi-automated procedure for different types of VWD (1, 3, 2A, 2B, 2M), plus control material (n = 580). The evaluation also focussed on relative loss of high and very high molecular weight multimers (HMWM and VHMWM) by densitometric scanning.

RESULTS

All evaluated VWF activity/Ag ratios showed high correlation to the presence/absence of HMWM and VHMWM, although VWF:CB/Ag and VWF:GPIbR/Ag ratios using an automated chemiluminescence method yielded highest correlation coefficients (r = .909 and .874, respectively, for HMWM). Use of the investigative procedure (VHMWM) identified fewer false positives for 'loss' in type 1 VWD.

CONCLUSIONS

This comparative investigation identified that new automated chemiluminescence VWF activity assays best identified relative loss or presence of HMWM and VHMWM according to activity to Ag ratios and an alternative investigative method for identifying VHMWM in multimer testing for a new commercial multimer method may lead to fewer false identifications of HMW loss in type 1 VWD.

Semi-automated von Willebrand factor multimer assay for von Willebrand disease: Further validation, benefits and limitations

INTRODUCTION

Accurate diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) enables effective patient management. von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimer analysis provides useful information regarding VWF multimer structure, thereby aiding VWD subtyping and management; however, historically technically challenging assays have had limited utility. This study evaluates the Sebia Hydrasys Hydragel-11 semi-automated VWF multimer assay and further validates the Hydragel-5 gel system, as primarily pertaining to VWD diagnostics and monitoring of therapy.

METHODS

Provisionally diagnosed (via a reference assay test panel) archived patient samples and prospective test patient samples, including those undergoing desmopressin trial or therapy monitoring, along with commercial and in-house control material and various external quality assessment (EQA) samples, were analysed. VWF multimers were evaluated for presence, loss or partial loss of high molecular weight (HMWM) and intermediate molecular weight (IMWM) multimers by both visual inspection and densitometric scanning, and comparison with reference assay results.

RESULTS

All anticipated multimer patterns were reproduced, with patients generally showing multimer profiles matching expected patterns according to VWD type based on reference test panel 'diagnosis'. Occasional discrepancies were resolved by retesting. The increase in plasma VWF following desmopressin therapy was also clearly demonstrated. Multimer profiles of EQA samples complemented reference test panel results and matched EQA targets. There were some 'technical' limitations noted.

CONCLUSION

This easy to use, standardised, semi-automated multimer analysis system can demonstrate the multimer profile of VWD patients, thus representing an additional laboratory tool for improved diagnosis, thereby facilitating appropriate patient management.

Optimization of von Willebrand factor multimer analysis in vertical mini-gel electrophoresis systems: A rapid procedure

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common cause of bleeding worldwide. Analysis of von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimer distribution (VWF:MD) is essential to properly classify and treat different types of VWD, and it is performed using a SDS agarose gel electrophoresis followed by Western blotting, a handmade technique that demands days to be completed and requires skillful execution. Aiming both to facilitate gel production and to shorten the preparation time, we developed an uncomplicated technique to provide agility in the analysis of VWF:MD, so that it can be easily accomplished in the routine practice of hemostasis laboratories. On that account, we used a commercial vertical mini-gel electrophoresis system for SDS-PAGE and a semi-dry transfer system, which allowed us to analyze VWF:MD of various samples in a period shorter than 12 h. This technique differentiated VWF:MD in human and animal plasmas under normal, congenital and acquired (experimental envenomation by Bothrops jararaca snake) conditions. This optimized method is cheap, rapid, reproducible, easy to be performed, and uses electrophoresis and Western blotting systems available in most laboratories. All these advantages encourage hemostasis professionals to use it in their routine practices. In order to facilitate the setup and accomplishment of the whole procedure step by step, videos were appended to the article.

Evaluation of a semi-automated von Willebrand factor multimer assay, the Hydragel 5 von Willebrand multimer, by two European Centers

BACKGROUND

The phenotypic diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a multistep process with classification dependent on the quantification of von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimeric structure. VWF multimer analysis is a technically challenging, lengthy and non-standardised assay, usually performed in specialist laboratories. Recently, a new semi-automated multimer assay, the Hydragel 5 von Willebrand multimers (H5VWM) has become available.

OBJECTIVES

This study, performed in two European centres, compared existing in-house multimer assays to the H5VWM in individuals with and without VWD.

RESULTS

Overall agreement of 91.1% was observed in 74 individuals with normal VWF levels, 57 patients grouped as type 1 VWD, 33 type 2A, 16 type 2B, 28 type 2M, 11 type 2N. Patients tested following Desmopressin or VWF concentrate, with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and acquired von Willebrand syndrome were also evaluated. Many of the discrepancies between methods were in patients with genetic mutations linked to more than one type of VWD including p.R1374C/H and p.R1315C. Quantifiable multimer results were available within one working day. Densitometry improved the interpretation of the multimers with slight structural variations that were not apparent by visual inspection of the in-house method.

CONCLUSIONS

5VWM was a rapid, sensitive, standardised assay which used existing technology and could be included as an initial screen of VWF multimers in a VWD diagnostic algorithm in conjunction with traditional multimer analysis.

Rare forms of von Willebrand disease

von Willebrand disease (VWD) arises from deficiency and/or defect(s) of plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF). In turn, plasma VWF is an adhesive protein which primarily functions by anchoring platelets to regions of vascular injury, thereby assisting prevention of bleeding. There is a proportional reduction also in Factor VIII, due to the absence of the stabilizing and anti-proteolytic effect that VWF normally exerts. VWD is reportedly the most common inherited bleeding disorder and can be classified into quantitative and qualitative defects, with type 1 and 3 VWD respectively identifying partial and total quantitative deficiency of VWF, and type 2 VWD identifying qualitative defects of VWF. The relative incidence of each subtype of VWD differs according to the locality and the ability of clinicians and laboratories to correctly diagnose and classify cases. In general, type 1 VWD is considered the most common type of VWD, whereas types 2 and 3 represent rarer forms. However, in developing countries, and partly because of consanguinity, type 3 VWD is over-represented. This review primarily focuses on the rarer forms of VWD, which typically comprise types 2 (A, B, M and N) and 3 VWD. The review also mentions type 1 VWD, largely for completeness and comparability, and since purportedly "severe" type 1 VWD, albeit not a formally recognized subtype of type 1 VWD, would represent a relatively "rare" form of VWD.

Postanalytical considerations that may improve the diagnosis or exclusion of haemophilia and von Willebrand disease

von Willebrand disease (VWD) and haemophilia represent the most common inherited or acquired bleeding disorders. However, many laboratories and clinicians may be challenged by their accurate diagnosis or exclusion. Difficulties in diagnosis/exclusion may include analytical issues, where assays occasionally generate an incorrect result (ie representing an analytical error) or have limitations in their measurement range of and/or low analytical sensitivity. Also increasingly recognized is the influence of preanalytical issues on the diagnosis of VWD or haemophilia. Unfortunately, postanalytical considerations are often not well considered in the diagnostic process. Therefore, this narrative review aims to provide an overview of some important postanalytical considerations that may help improve the diagnosis of VWD and haemophilia. This review primarily discusses aspects around reporting of test results. However, we also discuss other less well-recognized postanalytical considerations, including the use of assay ratios to help identify differential diagnoses and then guide further investigation.

Preclinical evaluation of a semi-automated and rapid commercial electrophoresis assay for von Willebrand factor multimers

BACKGROUND

The von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimer test is required to correctly subtype qualitative type 2 von Willebrand disease (VWD). The current VWF multimer assays are difficult, nonstandardized, and time-consuming. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of the commercial VWF multimer kit by Sebia (Lisses, France), an electrophoresis technique yielding same-day results.

METHODS

Ten healthy volunteer plasma samples, in-house reference plasma (IRP) and commercial normal plasma (CNP) samples, 10 plasma samples from patients with a known VWD type, 1 hemophilia A plasma sample, and 7 external quality assurance (EQA) samples were analyzed using the commercial VWF multimer kit. Additional coagulation testing included measurements of VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF activity (VWF:Ac), and FVIII activity (FVIII:C).

RESULTS

The CNP results revealed a relative loss of the highest molecular weight multimers; therefore, IRP was preferred as the reference sample. The interpretations of 10 patients with a known VWD type could be successfully reproduced and agreed with previous VWF multimer results. In all EQA surveys, the multimer results and final VWD diagnosis agreed with expert opinion.

CONCLUSIONS

The VWF multimer assay by Sebia is easy to perform and can be successfully implemented in any clinical laboratory for second-stage evaluation of VWD. The resolution power of multimer distribution is adequate to correctly classify VWD types 1, 2A, 2B, and 3.