The coagulation laboratory monitoring of Afstyla single-chain FVIII concentrate

Comprehensive laboratory assessment of lonoctocog alfa versus octocog alfa in severe haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Lonoctocog alfa is a single-chain factor VIII (FVIII) molecule with high binding affinity to von-Willebrand-factor. While it is well known that its plasma activity is underestimated by one-stage clotting assays (OSCA), there is a lack of knowledge on the post-infusion performance of lonoctocog alfa in global coagulation assays or its potential impact on the haemostatic balance in vivo.

AIM

To characterize lonoctocog alfa versus octocog alfa in pre- and post-infusion samples obtained from patients undergoing repeated investigation of incremental recovery (IR).

METHODS

Eighteen patients with severe haemophilia A (lonoctocog alfa: 10, octocog alfa: 8) were included. A panel of factor-specific and global coagulation assays was applied, comprising a FVIII OSCA, two FVIII chromogenic substrate assays (CSA), rotational thrombelastography and thrombin generation (TG). Potential activation of coagulation was assessed by measuring plasma thrombin markers and levels of activated protein C.

RESULTS

Comparable IRs were found for lonoctocog alfa and octocog alfa (2.36 [IU/dL]/[IU/kg] vs. 2.55 [IU/dL]/[IU/kg], respectively). Lonoctocog alfa activities were found to be underestimated by the FVIII OSCA while also the two FVIII CSAs showed statistically significant assay discrepancies on lonoctocog alfa. Effects of both FVIII products on rotational thrombelastography were less distinct than those on TG parameters. No elevated pre- or significantly shifting post-infusion plasma levels of coagulation biomarkers were detected.

CONCLUSION

Lonoctocog alfa and octocog alfa showed comparable recovery and safety in vivo as well as similar impacts on TG in vitro. Observed assay discrepancies on lonoctocog alfa demonstrated variability of results also between different FVIII CSAs.

Variability in combinations of APTT reagent and substrate plasma for a one-stage clotting assay to measure factor VIII products

INTRODUCTION

An investigation of the suitability of reagents for measuring FVIII products in a one-stage clotting assay (OSA) showed variations in their FVIII activity (FVIII:C). Most studies have focused on the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) reagent rather than FVIII-deficient plasma (F8DP), even though the APTT-based OSA is comprised of APTT reagents and factor-deficient plasma.

AIM

A single-centre study was conducted to clarify variations in measurements of FVIII products in an OSA using a total of 12 reagent combinations, including four APTT reagents and three types of F8DP.

METHODS

FVIII:C in nine types of FVIII product-spiked plasma was measured using an OSA with four different APTT reagents and three types of F8DP.

RESULTS

F8DP-dependent variations were found in addition to differences derived from APTT reagents. Variations in target recovery (TR) were observed for NovoEight®, Eloctate®, and Jivi®. Reduced TR for Jivi was found only for Pathromtin SL in combination with congenital F8DP (F8DP-3). This lower TR was not observed with alternative manufacturing lots of F8DP-3. The reduced TR for Jivi might be related to impaired contact activation due to lower factor XI activity in F8DP-3.

CONCLUSION

In addition to APTT reagents, variations in F8DPs used for OSAs can also affect FVIII:C results. F8DPs as well as the APTT reagent used for OSA should be chosen with caution, and laboratories should evaluate reagents for F8DPs as they currently do for APTT reagents, especially when lot changes occur.

Advances and challenges in the purification of recombinant coagulation factors: A review

Hemostasis is a complex process for the cessation of bleeding from an injured blood vessel, involving the interplay of 12 coagulation factors in the coagulation cascade with activated blood platelets and the vessel wall. Hence, the coagulation factors are important to control hemorrhage. However, the low abundance of many coagulation factors in human plasma proteins limited their production in therapeutic drugs and their clinical applications. With the development of modern biotechnology, commercially manufactured recombinant coagulation factors became available as hemostatic therapeutics, emerging a huge potential in pharmaceutical manufacturing market. Unlike antibodies, whose standard operation unit or platform purification processes in the industrial-scale downstream processing has been well-established, the complexity in post-translational modification and differences in structures of the coagulation factors posed specific challenges with respect to the downstream processing, which have long been limiting their industrial-scale production. This review presents a comprehensive overview of the technological development of commercially manufactured recombinant coagulation factors, with emphasis on their advances and challenges in the separation and purification processes. Firstly, the licensed products of the plasma derived and recombinant coagulation factors are summarized. Then, typical recombinant coagulation factors, i.e. factors VII, VIII and IX, are introduced with detailed discussion on their preparative separation procedures for both the licensed products of industrial-scale and the experimental cases of laboratory-scale. Finally, perspectives and challenges in the future development of the purification technology of recombinant coagulation factors are highlighted to provide new insight into the design of cost-effective purification processes of recombinant coagulation factors.

A global comparative field study to evaluate the factor VIII activity of efanesoctocog alfa by one-stage clotting and chromogenic substrate assays at clinical haemostasis laboratories

INTRODUCTION

Structural and chemical modifications of factor VIII (FVIII) products may influence their behaviour in FVIII activity assays. Hence, it is important to assess the performance of FVIII products in these assays. Efanesoctocog alfa is a new class of FVIII replacement therapy designed to provide both high sustained factor activity levels and prolonged plasma half-life.

AIM

Evaluate the accuracy of measuring efanesoctocog alfa FVIII activity in one-stage clotting assays (OSAs) and chromogenic substrate assays (CSAs).

METHODS

Human plasma with no detectable FVIII activity was spiked with efanesoctocog alfa or a full-length recombinant FVIII product comparator, octocog alfa, at nominal concentrations of 0.80 IU/mL, 0.20 IU/mL, or 0.05 IU/mL, based on labelled potency. Clinical haemostasis laboratories (N = 35) tested blinded samples using in-house assays. Data from 51 OSAs (14 activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT] reagents) and 42 CSAs (eight kits) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Efanesoctocog alfa activity was reliably (±25% of nominal activity) measured across all concentrations using OSAs with Actin FSL and multiple other aPTT reagents. Under- and overestimation of FVIII activity occurred with some reagents. No specific trend was observed for any class of aPTT activators. A two- to three-fold overestimation was consistently observed using CSAs and the OSA with Actin FS as the aPTT reagent across evaluated concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Under- or overestimation occurred with some specific OSAs and most CSAs, which has been previously observed with other modified FVIII replacement products. Efanesoctocog alfa FVIII activity was measured with acceptable accuracy and reliability using several OSA methods and commercial plasma standards.

Factor VIII and Factor IX Activity Measurements for Hemophilia Diagnosis and Related Treatments

Accurate measurement of clotting factors VIII (FVIII) or IX (FIX) is vital for comprehensive diagnosis and management of patients with hemophilia A or B. The one-stage activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)-based clotting assay is the most commonly used method worldwide for testing FVIII or FIX activities. Alternatively, FVIII and FIX chromogenic substrate assays, which assess the activation of factor X, are available in some specialized laboratories. The choice of reagent or methodology can strongly influence the resulting activity. Variation between one-stage FVIII or FIX activities has been reported in the measurement of some standard and extended half-life factor replacement therapies and gene therapy for hemophilia B using different aPTT reagents. Discrepancy between one-stage and chromogenic reagents has been demonstrated in some patients with mild hemophilia A or B, the measurement of some standard and extended half-life factor replacement therapies, and the transgene expression of hemophilia A and B patients who have received gene therapy. Finally, the measurement of bispecific antibody therapy in patients with hemophilia A has highlighted differences between chromogenic assays. It is imperative that hemostasis laboratories evaluate how suitable their routine assays are for the accurate measurement of the various hemophilia treatment therapies.

Clinical experience of switching patients with severe hemophilia to rVIII-SingleChain or rIX-FP

OBJECTIVE

Prophylaxis treatment is the current standard of care for patients with severe hemophilia. Factor concentrates with improved pharmacokinetics have offered more options for individualizing treatment. The treatment focus may be on increased protection, aiming for higher trough factor levels or longer dosing intervals to reduce the burden of hemophilia. Both aspects can have long-term effects on joint health. Products, such as rVIII‑SingleChain and rIX-FP have been developed to reduce the treatment burden for patients with hemophilia and optimize prophylactic efficacy. The objective of this report is to provide a summary of the clinical experience of different Hemophilia Treatment Centers in managing the switch to rVIII-SingleChain or rIX-FP in patients with hemophilia.

METHODS

This report summarizes a selection of patient cases presented at the 3rd Alliance for Coagulation Academy Meeting in October 2020. The cases from the participating centers provide examples of the clinical experience in managing patients' switch to rVIII-SingleChain and rIX‑FP, including which types of patients are suitable for switching, and practical steps in managing a switch.

RESULTS

It is important to take into consideration the physical and social fulfillment of the patient when deciding to switch to rVIII-SingleChain or rIX-FP. The physician plays an important role in the motivation of patients as they understand not only the patient's needs but the potential benefits of the new treatment.

CONCLUSION

The selected patient cases reported here demonstrate that patients may wish to switch factor products for a variety of reasons; therefore, it is critical to understand why patients switch and what they expect from switching.

An Update on Laboratory Diagnostics in Haemophilia A and B

Haemophilia A (HA) and B (HB) are X-linked hereditary bleeding disorders caused by lack of activity of coagulation factors VIII (FVIII) or IX (FIX), respectively. Besides conventional products, modern replacement therapies include FVIII or FIX concentrates with an extended half-life (EHL-FVIII/FIX). Two main strategies for measuring plasma FVIII or FIX activity are applied: the one-stage clotting assay (OSCA) and the chromogenic substrate assay (CSA), both calibrated against plasma (FVIII/FIX) standards. Due to the structural modifications of EHL-FVIII/FIX, reagent-dependent assay discrepancies have been described when measuring the activity of these molecules. Assay discrepancies have also been observed in FVIII/FIX gene therapy approaches. On the other hand, nonfactor replacement by the bispecific antibody emicizumab, a FVIIIa-mimicking molecule, artificially shortens activated partial thromboplastin time–based clotting times, making standard OSCAs inapplicable for analysis of samples from patients treated with this drug. In this review, we aim to give an overview on both, the currently applied and future therapies in HA and HB with or without inhibitors and corresponding test systems suitable for accompanying diagnostics.

Monitoring of different factor VIII replacement products using a factor VIII one-stage clotting assay on cobas t 511/711 analysers

INTRODUCTION

Recombinant coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) products are the standard of care for patients with haemophilia A. The development of modified FVIII products has provided benefit for patients but presented challenges for monitoring FVIII activity.

AIM

This single-centre study evaluated the Roche FVIII one-stage clotting assay (OSA) in measuring FVIII activity in plasma samples spiked with seven FVIII products at clinically relevant concentrations.

METHODS

FVIII-deficient plasma samples were spiked with two batches of recombinant FVIII products (octocog alfa, moroctocog alfa, simoctocog alfa, efmoroctocog alfa, damoctocog alfa pegol, rurioctocog alfa pegol, lonoctocog alfa) at 1-120 IU/dL FVIII activity, according to their labelled potency. Measurement was conducted on the cobas t 511/711 analysers using the Roche FVIII OSA and the Technoclone TECHNOCHROM FVIII:C chromogenic substrate assay (CSA).

RESULTS

Using the OSA, FVIII activity was close to labelled potency for most analysed FVIII products including a recombinant FVIII Fc fusion protein. PEGylated FVIII product, damoctocog alfa pegol, was marginally above and single-chain product, lonoctocog alfa, below the predefined acceptance criteria: for FVIII activity < 25 IU/dL: ± 5 IU/dL; for FVIII activity ≥ 25 IU/dL: ± 20% (relative). The different principles of OSA and CSA led to discrepancies in the estimation of all analysed FVIII products. Additionally, in vitro recovery was increased at lower levels of FVIII activity using the OSA, whereas recovery was more consistent using the CSA.

CONCLUSION

These data allow the interpretation of FVIII activity results for different FVIII products using the Roche FVIII OSA on the cobas t 511/711 analysers.

Laboratory issues in gene therapy and emicizumab

The treatment options for the haemostatic disorders, haemophilia A and haemophilia B, have progressed rapidly over the last decade. The introduction of extended half-life recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) concentrates to replace these missing clotting factors highlighted discordance between one-stage activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)-based clotting factor assays and chromogenic factor assays with some products. This raised awareness of the importance of investigation of potential reagent or assay differences by pharmaceutical companies. In 2017, the FVIII mimetic, emicizumab, was approved as a prophylactic treatment for haemophilia A patients with anti-FVIII inhibitors. The mechanism of action of emicizumab causes interference with some commonly used haemostasis tests including the APTT and its associated one-stage APTT-based clotting assays. Chromogenic assays may also be affected but this is dependent on the particular constituents of the reagents. Chromogenic assays containing human factor IXa (FIXa) and factor X (FX) are sensitive to the presence of emicizumab but those containing bovine FIXa and FX are unaffected. Many haemostasis laboratories have been required to evaluate new assays to enable accurate monitoring of emicizumab in patient plasma. A number of gene therapy approaches have been trialled in both haemophilia A and haemophilia B but there are scant data published on the measurement of FVIII and FIX in these patients and whether there are discrepancies between reagents or assay methodologies.

Factor VIII and IX assays for post-infusion monitoring in hemophilia patients: Guidelines from the French BIMHO group (GFHT)

Replacement therapy with plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII and FIX (pdFVIII/pdFIX or rFVIII/rFIX) concentrates is the standard of treatment in patients with haemophilia A and B, respectively. Measurement of factor VIII (FVIII:C) or factor IX (FIX:C) levels can be done by one-stage clotting assay (OSA) or chromogenic substrate assay (CSA). The French study group on the Biology of Hemorrhagic Diseases (a collaborative group of the GFHT and MHEMO network) presents a literature review and proposals for the monitoring of FVIII:C and FIX:C levels in treated haemophilia A and B patients, respectively. The use of CSA is recommended for the monitoring of patients treated with pdFVIII or rFVIII including extended half-life (EHL) rFVIII. Except for rFVIII-Fc, great caution is required when measuring FVIII:C levels by OSA in patients substituted by EHL-rFVIII. The OSA is recommended for the monitoring of patients treated with pdFIX or rFIX. Large discordances in the FIX:C levels measured for extended half-life rFIX (EHL-rFIX), depending on the method and reagents used, must lead to great attention when OSA is used for measuring FIX:C levels in patients substituted by EHL-rFIX. Data of most of recent studies, obtained with spiked plasmas, deserve to be confirmed in plasma samples of treated patients.

Estimation of Nuwiq® (simoctocog alfa) activity using one-stage and chromogenic assays-Results from an international comparative field study

Background

Accurate determination of coagulation factor VIII activity (FVIII:C) is essential for effective and safe FVIII replacement therapy. FVIII:C can be measured by one‐stage and chromogenic substrate assays (OSAs and CSAs, respectively); however, there is significant interlaboratory and interassay variability.

Aims

This international comparative field study characterized the behaviour of OSAs and CSAs used in routine laboratory practice to measure the activity of Nuwiq^® (human‐cl rhFVIII, simoctocog alfa), a fourth‐generation recombinant human FVIII produced in a human cell line.

Methods

FVIII‐deficient plasma was spiked with Nuwiq^® or Advate^® at 1, 5, 30 and 100 international units (IU)/dL. Participating laboratories analysed the samples using their routine procedures and equipment. Accuracy, inter‐ and intralaboratory variation, CSA:OSA ratio and the impact of different OSA and CSA reagents were assessed.

Results

Forty‐nine laboratories from 9 countries provided results. Mean absolute FVIII:C was comparable for both products at all concentrations with both OSA and CSA, with interproduct ratios (Nuwiq^®:Advate^®) of 1.02‐1.13. Mean recoveries ranged from 97% to 191% for Nuwiq^®, and from 93% to 172% for Advate^®, with higher recoveries at lower concentrations. Subgroup analyses by OSA and CSA reagents showed minor variations depending on reagents, but no marked differences between the two products. CSA:OSA ratios based on overall means ranged from 0.99 to 1.17 for Nuwiq^® and from 1.01 to 1.17 for Advate^®.

Conclusions

Both OSAs and CSAs are suitable for the measurement of FVIII:C of Nuwiq^® in routine laboratory practice, without the need for a product‐specific reference standard.

Laboratory assay measurement of modified clotting factor concentrates: a review of the literature and recommendations for practice

Over the past several years, novel modified clotting factor concentrates (CFCs) have been introduced into practice and are now widely prescribed in the countries where they are licensed. These products allow for less frequent infusions of CFC, thereby providing improved convenience and/or higher trough levels. They have been extensively studied for prophylaxis, episodic treatment of bleeding and for surgical prophylaxis. One issue that has emerged regarding the clinical application of these products revolves around the measurement of infused CFC in the clinical coagulation laboratory. Recent studies have demonstrated significant problems with the measurement of correct FVIII/IX levels following infusion of novel CF VIII/IX concentrates. The source of this problem appears to be related to the tremendous variability of the APTT reagents that are used in the one-stage clotting assay, the most commonly used assay for determining factor levels. More specifically, the issue is related to the type of activator used in the reagents. Depending on the combination of the CFC and the APTT activator, the observed results may be either under- or overestimated to degrees that would be clinically relevant. Recommendations based on a review of published information regarding the potential for incorrect measurements of factor VIII/IX levels following infusion of recently developed, novel factor VIII/IX CFCs are presented for the clinician to use in clinical practice.

Accurate measurement of extended half-life and unmodified factor VIII low levels with one-stage FVIII assays is dependent on the matrix of calibration curves

INTRODUCTION

The monitoring of factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy relies on the accurate measurement of FVIII activity over a large concentration range. However, unexplained overestimation of low FVIII levels has recently been reported with extended half-life recombinant FVIIIs.

AIM

The objective of this study was to confirm previous publications indicating that the reagents used to generate the calibration curves determine the accuracy of the measurement of low FVIII levels.

METHODS

We generated FVIII calibration curves with FVIII-deficient plasmas or a commercial diluent buffer. We then measured FVIII levels in FVIII-deficient plasma spiked with plasma FVIII, a full-length recombinant FVIII (Advate^® , Shire, Brussels, Belgium) and two extended half-life recombinant FVIIIs (Elocta^® , Swedish Orphan Biovitrum, Woluwe Saint-Lambert, Belgium and Afstyla^® , CSL Behring, Mechelen, Belgium). FVIII levels were also analyzed in spiked samples prediluted two- and fourfold, either in diluent buffer or in FVIII-deficient plasma to evaluate parallelism.

RESULTS

Coagulation times of calibration curves generated with diluent buffer were longer than those with FVIII-deficient plasmas. This resulted in an overestimation of FVIII levels lower than 25 IU/dL in spiked samples and in detection of FVIII activity (≥1 IU/dL) in FVIII-deficient plasma. Predilution of samples with diluent buffer rather than with FVIII-deficient plasma also led to discordant results.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirm that the generation of calibration curves by dilution in FVIII-deficient plasma is crucial for the accurate measurement of low FVIII levels. When serial dilutions of samples are analyzed, predilution in FVIII-deficient plasma is required to respect the parallelism criteria. These methods should be more generally implemented for coagulation instruments.

Advances in the Treatment of Hemophilia: Implications for Laboratory Testing

BACKGROUND

Until recently, clinical laboratories have monitored hemophilia treatment by measuring coagulation factors before/after infusion of human-derived or recombinant factors. Substantial changes are expected in the near future based on new therapeutic approaches that have been or are being developed.

CONTENT

Hemophilia treatment includes replacement therapy with human-derived/recombinant factors or treatment with bypassing agents for patients without or with inhibitors, respectively. Accordingly, laboratory methods for monitoring include one-stage clotting or chromogenic assays meant to measure either factor VIII/IX or global coagulation tests to measure the effect of bypassing agents. Recently, modified long-acting coagulation factors have been introduced for which discrepant results may be expected when measurement is performed with one-stage clotting or chromogenic assays. Currently, novel drugs not based on coagulation factors are under development and are being tested in clinical studies. These drugs do require new methods and therefore laboratory evaluation of hemophilia will undergo dramatic changes in the near future.

SUMMARY

From the analysis of the current practice and literature, we draw the following conclusions: (a) Thrombin generation or thromboelastometry are the logical candidate assays to monitor bypassing agents. (b) Considerable differences are expected when measuring modified long-acting coagulation factors, depending on whether one-stage or chromogenic assays are used. Although no definitive conclusions can presently be drawn, chromogenic assays are probably more suitable than one-stage clotting. (c) Novel drugs not based on coagulation factors such as emicizumab, fitusiran, or concizumab that are entering the market do require alternative methods that are not yet well established.

New challenges and best practices for the laboratory monitoring of factor VIII and factor IX replacement

Several recombinant factor VIII and factor IX concentrates with extended half-life (EHL) have recently been validated by clinical studies. The availability of these novel concentrates is expected to significantly facilitate the treatment of patients with hemophilia A and B. However, the modification applied to these molecules has introduced variations in their activity measurement in routine coagulation assays. Depending on the assays, underestimations of up to 10-fold or overestimations of up to approximately 30-fold in the measurements of the recovery have been reported in some factor concentrates. Such biases in monitoring may lead to major under- or overtreatment, as well as unnecessary searching for inhibitor antibodies. In this review, we discuss the guidelines and recommendations that allow the selection of optimal strategies to monitor patients treated with these novel factor concentrates. Based on the specificities of the assays and on local regulations, different chromogenic substrate assays in addition to one-stage clotting assays may be validated to allow the accurate measurement of all novel products. An efficient communication between the clinical laboratory and the clinicians is essential to ensure that the appropriate assays are carried out in laboratories and that the clinicians correctly evaluate the data. Further laboratory and clinical studies are still required for the optimization of the laboratory assays that can be used in the measurement of novel factor VIII and factor IX concentrates with EHL.

Shifting Landscape of Hemophilia Therapy: Implications for Current Clinical Laboratory Coagulation Assays

Clinical coagulation assays are an integral part of diagnosing and managing patients with hemophilia; however, in this new era of bioengineered factor products and non-factor therapeutics, problems have arisen with use of traditional coagulation tests for the quantification of several of these new products. Discussion over the use of one-stage clotting assays versus chromogenic substrate assays for clinical decision making and potency labeling has been ongoing for many years. Emerging factor concentrates have heightened concern over assay selection and availability. Emicizumab interferes with all aPTT based assays, rendering them unreliable and potentially falsely reassuring to the unaware provider. This review explores considerations for coagulation assays in the clinical setting and highlights how awareness of institutional coagulation assays and potential limitations have never been more critical for providers caring for patients with bleeding disorders. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.