Evaluating international Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) results combined with expert opinion: Options for a shorter HJHS

Outcome measures in hemophilia: current and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia can detrimentally affect patients' quality of life and likelihood of survival. In the evolving landscape of therapies, the therapeutic gain of each treatment must be understood to accurately position it in the therapeutic armamentarium. Accordingly, appropriate outcomes must be measured with appropriate tools.

AREAS COVERED

Our narrative review (PubMed search for 'hemophilia AND outcome' until June 2023), provides a compendium of outcome measures used in hemophilia clinical research. To define each outcome measure's relative value and applicability, several characteristics are critically discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Bleeding assessment, first annual/annualized bleeding rate, remains central in evaluating the efficacy and safety of hemophilia treatments. As modern therapies improve clinical outcomes toward zero bleeding events, this endpoint may become less sensitive to detect differences between therapeutic approaches. Technological advancements necessitate the adaptation of outcome measures to address infrequent bleeding events, age-related comorbidities, and laboratory parameters with limited comparability after different treatments. Considerable effort has been dedicated to the development of tools that comprehensively assess coagulation, such as thrombin generation assays. Patient-reported outcome measures are gaining importance although limited by their subjectivity. A definitive set of research outcome measures remains elusive. Outcomes may need to be tailored to different therapeutic interventions.

Structural alterations and pain perception at the ankle joint in patients with haemophilia

BACKGROUND

Patients with haemophilia (PwH) suffer from chronic pain due to joint alterations induced by recurring haemorrhage.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between structural alterations and pain perception at the ankle joint in PwH.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Ankle joints of 79 PwH and 57 healthy controls (Con) underwent ultrasound examination (US) and assessment of pain sensitivity via pressure pain thresholds (PPT). US discriminated between joint activity (synovitis) and joint damage (cartilage and/or bone degeneration) applying the HEAD-US protocol. Based on US-findings, five subgroups were built: PwH with activity/damage, PwH with activity/no damage, PwH with no activity/no damage, controls with activity/no damage and controls with no activity/no damage.

RESULTS

Joint activity and joint damage were significantly increased in ankles of PwH compared to Con (p ≤.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that structural alterations negatively impact pain perception. This is particularly evident when comparing PwH with both activity/damage to PwH with no activity/no damage at the tibiotalar joint (p = .001). At the fibulotalar joint, no significant differences were observed between PwH subgroups. Further analysis showed that both joint activity and joint damage result in an increase in pain sensitivity (p ≤.001).

CONCLUSION

The data suggest a relation between joint activity, joint damage and pain perception in PwH. Even minor changes due to synovitis appear to affect pain perception, with the effect not intensifying at higher levels of inflammation. In terms of joint damage, severe degeneration leads to a sensitised pain state most robustly, whereas initial changes do not seem to significantly affect pain perception.

Outcomes and outcome measures

INTRODUCTION

Advances in haemophilia treatment have resulted in a near-normal life expectancy, lower burden of bleeding and treatment, and improved quality of life in high-income countries. Bleeding rate is approaching zero and novel parameters should be evaluated to assess the efficacy of treatment not only from the clinical point of view by using new methodologies (e.g. joint health assessment), but also from the patient's perspective (e.g. pain, quality of life, treatment satisfaction).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This approach should be aimed at combining objective clinical methodologies and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). However, some instruments used for assessing PROs are still suboptimal and not properly validated. Recent evidence suggests that these tools can take advantage from a more personalized designed approach and could be effectively improved and serve to facilitate the patient's self-evaluation. For other congenital bleeding disorders (BDs), a set of patient-relevant outcomes has been also defined that overlap substantially those of haemophilia, including bleeding, side effects and complications, and PROs, such as pain, physical functioning, impact on daily life including school and work and mental health. There is a growing focus on addressing women-specific outcomes in BDs, reflecting an increased awareness of the unique challenges faced by women in this context. However, the development of tailored tools is imperative to further advance the progress in managing women with BDs, ensuring more accurate monitoring and personalized care.

CONCLUSIONS

How incorporating these outcome measures in the process of approval of novel treatments for these disorders by regulatory authorities remains to be established.

Effectiveness of emicizumab in preventing bleeding events in severe and moderate hemophilia A: A single-center experience in Bangladesh

Emicizumab is a monoclonal antibody that bridges activated factor IX (FIX) and factor X (FX) to replace the function of missing activated factor VIII (FVIII) in hemophilia A patients irrespective of FVIII inhibitor status. This study assessed the effectiveness of emicizumab in preventing bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia A. This observational study included patients with moderate to severe hemophilia A who were undergoing episodic FVIII replacement therapy. The primary endpoint was the difference in annualized bleeding rates (ABR) and the secondary endpoint was the difference in Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) before and after emicizumab prophylaxis. A total of 30 male hemophilia patients were included, the mean age was 16.7 (SD: ±8.1) years, and most of them had moderate hemophilia A [63.3%]. Before prophylaxis, the median ABR was 48 (interquartile range [IQR]: 35-60), and 93.3% of patients had ABR greater than eight, whereas after prophylaxis the median ABR decreased significantly (median [IQR]: 0 [0.0-0.4], p < 0.001), and 56.7% had zero bleeds. ABR was not significantly different in patient with and without FVIII inhibitors. The HJHS scores significantly improved after prophylaxis (10 vs. 2.5, p < 0.001). The bleeding events were reduced significantly (23 vs. 0.0, p < 0.001), and zero new target joints were reported after prophylaxis. Most of the patients [93.3%] did not face any serious adverse events after prophylaxis. Emicizumab prophylaxis was associated with a significantly lower rate of bleeding events among participants with hemophilia A, regardless of inhibitor status.

Noninterventional study assessing joint health in persons with hemophilia A after switching to turoctocog alfa pegol: design of pathfinderReal

Background

Joint damage affects the quality of life of persons with hemophilia A. The long-term safety and efficacy of turoctocog alfa pegol (N8-GP) prophylaxis in persons with hemophilia A has been investigated in pivotal phase 3 trials in children, adolescents, and adults (pathfinder program). However, there is a lack of data on joint health in adult persons with hemophilia A treated with N8-GP.

Objectives

To describe the design of the ongoing pathfinderReal study investigating the joint health status in adult persons with hemophilia A after switching to N8-GP.

Methods

pathfinderReal is a multicountry, noninterventional, single-arm study (NCT05621746) of joint health in adult (≥18 years) male persons with hemophilia A who have switched to N8-GP. Patients enrolled in other interventional studies and those who have previously terminated N8-GP treatment will be excluded. Approximately 124 adults with hemophilia A will be enrolled and followed up for a maximum of 24 months. Data from routine clinical assessments of patients' joint health will be collected. The primary endpoint is change in Hemophilia Joint Health Score (defined as a change in total score of ≤2) from initiation of N8-GP treatment until the end of the study. Secondary endpoints include number of bleeding episodes, number and resolution of target joints, patient-reported outcomes of problem joint score, pain score, and change in physical function levels. An exploratory endpoint is included to measure the number of patients achieving improved Hemophilia Joint Health Score from the initiation of N8-GP until the end of the study.

Conclusion

The pathfinderReal study will provide insights regarding the impact of N8-GP on joint health in persons with hemophilia A in a real-world setting.

Paradox pain sensitivity using cuff pressure or algometer testing in patients with hemophilia

INTRODUCTION

Pain is a common comorbidity in patients with hemophilia (PwH) due to hemophilic arthropathy. This study aims to explore pain sensitivity in PwH methodologically investigating in cuff pressure testing compared to algometer testing.

METHODS

37 PwH and 35 healthy control subjects (Con) enrolled in this study. Joint health status was assessed. Subjective pain was evaluated using numeric rating scales. Pain sensitivity was measured with pressure algometry and cuff pressure algometry. Pressure pain thresholds of the algometer (PPTa) were measured at knee, ankle joints, and forehead. Subsequently, thresholds of cuff pressure were measured at the left and right lower legs (PPTcuff). In both, lower values represent higher pain sensitivity.

RESULTS

PwH exerted a worse joint health status than Con. Pain sensitivity was higher in PwH compared to Con as PPTa of the knee and ankle joints were lower in PwH. No difference was observed in PPTa at the forehead. Contrastingly, lower pain sensitivity was detected in PwH by higher PPTcuff values compared to Con in both legs.

CONCLUSION

While PPTa of the knee and ankle joints are lower in PwH, PPTcuff are higher in PwH compared to Con. This reveals a paradox situation, highlighting that PwH experience local, joint- and hemophilic arthropathy-related pain, whereas pain sensitivity of non-affected soft tissue structures is lower. The reasons explaining the PPTcuff results remain elusive but might be explained by coping strategies counteracting chronic joint pain, resulting in lower sensitivity at non-affected structures.

Acquired haemophilia A in an elderly patient: A case report of functional recovery through physiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Acquired haemophilia-A, although uncommon in elderly patients, poses significant clinical challenges, especially when associated with profound musculoskeletal complications. The potential mimicry of hematomas as tumors further complicates the diagnostic process.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 85-year-old male, with a remote history of hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and right inguinal hernia, presented with acute pain in the left lower limb, functional limitation, and deep hematomas in the ileopsoas and axillary region. Initial suspicions of a sarcomatous lesion in the ileopsoas, based on radiological findings, were refuted following histopathological examinations, which confirmed the presence of necrotic hemorrhagic tissue. The patient underwent a one-month physical therapy regimen, targeting lower extremity muscles, especially around the hip joint.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

The severity of the presentation and the involvement of vital muscles like the ileopsoas and quadriceps underscored the importance of comprehensive rehabilitation. Consistent therapeutic interventions, targeting muscle strength and joint function, demonstrated marked improvement as evidenced by the HJHS, HAL, and FISH scores. The multidisciplinary approach, entailing hematological, rehabilitative, and supportive measures, was paramount in ensuring holistic patient recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Acquired haemophilia-A in the elderly necessitates an integrative care approach, encompassing accurate diagnosis and tailored therapeutic interventions. This case emphasizes the transformative potential of dedicated physiotherapy in managing the musculoskeletal implications of this bleeding disorder, underscoring the value of early intervention and comprehensive care.

Age-specific incidence of joint disease in paediatric patients with haemophilia: A single-centre real-world outcome based on consecutive US examination

INTRODUCTION

Joint health is one of the most important factors contributing to a healthy life in patients with haemophilia. Recent study revealed that starting early prophylaxis was not enough to prevent joint disease in most paediatric patients with haemophilia.

AIM

In this study, we aimed to determine the age-specific incidence of acute joint disease during childhood at single haemophilia treatment centre (HTC).

METHOD

The joint health in 48 patients was evaluated based on consecutive US testing for 5 years at annual multidisciplinary comprehensive care.

RESULTS

During the study period, 23 patients (47.9%) had no joint disease since the initial examination, whereas 13 patients (27.0%) showed development from negative to positive findings. The incidence of joint disease increased with age: 0% in preschool, 5.3% in elementary school, 14.3% in junior high school and 35% beyond high school age. Among the 13 patients who developed joint disease, two experienced acquired synovitis that resolved during the follow-up period. Statistical analysis revealed that the patients who routinely underwent follow-up by the HTC exhibited a significantly lower incidence of joint disease than did those followed up at other institutions (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

These results indicated that close check-up, including routine joint examination using US as well as frequent assessment of pharmacokinetic profile at the HTC, might play an important role in avoiding joint disease among paediatric patients with haemophilia.

Assessment of vascular endothelial growth factor a serum level in pediatric hemophilic arthropathy

Background

Children with hemophilia have serious, recurrent joint bleeding that causes disabilities. Regular factor VIII concentrate replacements have not yet completely stopped intra-articular subclinical hemorrhages and permanent joint damage. The prevention of joint damage requires the early detection and management of this hemorrhage. Neoangiogenesis is crucial in the development of synovitis after recurrent hemophilic joint bleeding. This study assessed the level of serum Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) as a vascular biomarker in children with hemophilia A to determine its possible role as a diagnostic biomarker for hemophilic arthropathy.

Result

A case–control study with 30 male children who had hemophilia A and 30 healthy controls was conducted. Patients had significantly higher serum VEGF-A levels than the control group (specificity was 70.0% and sensitivity was 83.3%). Hemophilia severity and Hemophilia Joint Health Score had a significant positive correlation with VEGF-A.

Conclusion

Children with hemophilia A had significantly higher levels of VEGF-A in their serum. Additionally, VEGF-A had a significant positive correlation with Hemophilia Joint Health Score as well as the severity of the disease. In children with hemophilia A, VEGF-A can be used as a marker for early hemophilic arthropathy detection.

Individualised prophylaxis based on personalised target trough FVIII level optimised clinical outcomes in paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

As standard care of severe haemophilia A (SHA), prophylaxis should be individualised.

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of this new-proposed individualised prophylaxis protocol.

METHODS

Boys with SHA were enrolled and followed a PK-guided, trough-level escalating protocol of prophylaxis after a six-month observational period. In the next 2 years, clinical assessments including joint bleeds, ultrasound (US) scores and Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) in both sides of ankles, knees and elbows were conducted every 6 months as a scoring system, which determined whether the trough level's escalation. Adjustment of dosing regimen was based on WAPPS-Hemo.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight SHA boys were finally analysed. Their age and bodyweight were 5.3(2.8,6.9) years and 21.5(16,25) kg. During the study, 47 escalations were conducted. At study exit, the patient number and proportion of different trough level groups were: < 1 IU/dl, 17.2% (10/58); 1-3 IU/dl, 53.5% (31/58); 3-5 IU/dl, 15.5% (9/58); > 5 IU/dl, 13.8% (8/58). Significantly reduced annualised bleeding rate [4(0,8) to 0(0,2), p < .0001] and annualised joint bleeding rate [2(0,4) to 0(0,.25), p < .0001] was observed at study exit as well as the continuous trend of increased zero bleeding proportion (ZBP) (27.6%-69.0%) and zero joint bleeding proportion (46.5%-81.3%). Besides, 85% (6/7) of the target joints vanished. Statistical improvements of US scores (p = .04) and HJHS (p = .02) were also reported at study exit.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed the effectiveness of our protocol based on individualised target trough level and emphasise the importance of personalised prophylaxis.

Postural Assessment Systems in the Prevention of Haemophilic Arthropathy: A Narrative Review

This narrative review aims to give an overview of some postural evaluation systems currently used in patients with haemophilia. Among them, first, we analyse the HJHS scale, recognized as a specific evaluation tool for haemophilic arthropathy. Second, we focus on other systems usually used in non-haemophilic patients that have also shown good applicability in this patient category, such as gait analysis, stabilometry, and baropodometric examination. This review underlines the use these tools could have in clinical practice to identify the early postural alterations in patients with haemophilia and set up personalised rehabilitation programs.

Quality of life and clinical assessment of joint health in children with hemophilic arthropathy

Background

Hemophilic arthropathy results in pain, deformity, and disability with severe impairments, activity limitation, and thus productivity loss. Also patterns of treatment interfere with patients’ life, so the quality of life should be assessed when evaluating treatment. The aim of this work was to assess the quality of life of children with hemophilic arthropathy and its relation to clinical joint health.

Results

The study was carried out on fifty boys with hemophilic arthropathy. All patients were subjected to thorough local clinical assessment of the most affected and/or target joint using Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS 2.1) and assessment of quality of life using Haemo quality of life (Haemo-Qol) questionnaire children and parent versions. Among the fifty hemophilic patients, 36 (72%) patients were hemophilia A and 14 (28 %) patients were hemophilia B. The age at first hemarthrosis ranged from 1 to 8 years with a mean of 2.40±1.78. While the number of joints affected in the studied patients ranged from 2 to 13 joints with a mean of 7±3.25. As regards the severity, 23 patients (46%) had severe, and 27 (54%) had moderate hemophilia. Forty four (88%) patients had different degrees of anemia. There was significant correlation between child Haemo-QoL with degree of anemia (r = 0.291, P = 0.040), mainly with view and school dimensions. There were significant correlations between child and parent Haemo-QoL and HJHS with each of the following: factor activity level, duration of the disease, duration of joint disease, number of bleeding attacks last year, and number of joints affected. Synovectomy was done for 5 (10%) patients. The total child Haemo-QoL score was statistically significantly lower after the intervention (P=0.043), with a significant improvement in physical health, feeling, view, family, school and sports, treatment, and dealing dimensions. In the current study, there were significant positive correlations between child and parent Haemo-QoL and HJHS scores.

Conclusions

The quality of life in patients with hemophilic arthropathy was influenced by the joint health, factor activity level, disease duration, number of bleeding attacks, number of joints affected (during life), duration of joint disease, and presence of hepatitis C virus.

The Hemophilia Joint Health Score version 2.1 Validation in Adult Patients Study: A multicenter international study

Background

The Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) was developed and validated to detect arthropathy in children. Additional evidence is required to show validity in adults. We studied the convergent and discriminant construct validity of the HJHS version 2.1(HJHSv2.1) in adults with hemophilia. A secondary aim was to define age-related normative adult HJHSv2.1 reference values.

Methods

We studied 192 adults with hemophilia, and 120 healthy adults in four age-matched groups-18 to 29, 30 to 40, 41 to 50, and >50 years-at nine centers. Trained physiotherapists scored the HJHS and World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) joint score. Health history, the Functional Independence Scale of Hemophilia (FISH), Hemophilia Activities List (HAL), and Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) were also collected.

Results

The median age was 35.0 years. Of participants with hemophilia, 68% had severe, 14% moderate, and 18% mild disease. The HJHS correlated strongly with WFH score (Spearman's rho [rs ] = .95, P < .001). Moderate correlations were seen between the FISH (rs  = .50, P < .001) and SF-MPQ Present Pain Intensity (rs  = .50, P < .001), while a modest correlation was found with the HAL (rs  = -.37, P < .001). The HJHS significantly differentiated between age groups (Kruskal-Wallis T = 35.02, P < .001) and disease severity in participants with hemophilia. The HJHS had high internal reliability (Cronbach's α = .88). We identified duration of swelling as a redundant item in the HJHS.

Conclusions

The HJHS shows evidence of strong convergent and discriminant construct validity to detect arthropathy in adults with hemophilia and is well suited for use in this population.

Clinical and ultrasound evaluation of patients with haemophilia on prophylaxis

INTRODUCTION

Primary prophylaxis is the current gold standard in haemophilia care for the prevention of bleeding and ensuing joint damage. Early detection of joint bleeding, whether symptomatic or subclinical, preferably during childhood, helps prevent joint deterioration and subsequent disability. The aim of this study is to evaluate the level of agreement between the Haemophilia Joint Health Score and the Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound tools in children with severe haemophilia on primary and secondary prophylaxis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients were followed up regularly at our centre. Elbows, knees and ankles were evaluated by physical examination using the Haemophilia Joint Health Score 2.1 (HJHS 2.1), and by ultrasound with HEAD-US score.

RESULTS

A total of 80 children with haemophilia on prophylaxis were included in this study. Mean age was 10.8 years (range 4-18). We evaluated 480 joints, of which 423 (88.1%) were concordant with both tools, whereas 57 (11.9%) were discordant; 377 (78.5%) joints scored 0 on HJHS, 370 (77%) on HEAD-US and 345 (72%) on both tools. The overall Kappa concordance coefficient was .656. For elbows, knees and ankles the respective values were .783, .522 and .589. For HJHS scores greater than 3, all joints scored ≥1 on HEAD-US.

CONCLUSION

HJHS and HEAD-US are used to assess joint health in children with haemophilia on prophylaxis. In this study, the level of agreement between both tools was consistent with literature values only for the elbow joint.

Patient-relevant health outcomes for hemophilia care: Development of an international standard outcomes set

BACKGROUND

Patient-relevant health outcomes for persons with hemophilia should be identified and prioritized to optimize and individualize care for persons with hemophilia. Therefore, an international group of persons with hemophilia and multidisciplinary health care providers set out to identify a globally applicable standard set of health outcomes relevant to all individuals with hemophilia.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed to identify possible health outcomes and risk adjustment variables. Persons with hemophilia and multidisciplinary health care providers were involved in an iterative nominal consensus process to select the most important health outcomes and risk adjustment variables for persons with hemophilia. Recommendations were made for outcome measurement instruments.

RESULTS

Persons with hemophilia were defined as all men and women with an X-linked inherited bleeding disorder caused by a deficiency of coagulation factor VIII or IX with plasma activity levels <40 IU/dL. We recommend collecting the following 10 health outcomes at least annually, if applicable: (i) cure, (ii) impact of disease on life expectancy, (iii) ability to engage in normal daily activities, (iv) severe bleeding episodes, (v) number of days lost from school or work, (vi) chronic pain, (vii) disease and treatment complications, (viii) sustainability of physical functioning, (ix) social functioning, and (x) mental health. Validated clinical as well as patient-reported outcome measurement instruments were endorsed. Demographic factors, baseline clinical factors, and treatment factors were identified as risk-adjustment variables.

CONCLUSION

A consensus-based international set of health outcomes relevant to all persons with hemophilia, and corresponding measurement instruments, was identified for use in clinical care to facilitate harmonized longitudinal monitoring and comparison of outcomes.

Haemophilia early arthropathy detection with ultrasound and haemophilia joint health score in the moderate haemophilia (MoHem) study

INTRODUCTION

Detection of early arthropathy is crucial for the management of haemophilia, but data on moderate haemophilia are limited. Therefore, we evaluated joint health and treatment modalities in Nordic patients with moderate haemophilia A (MHA) and B (MHB).

AIM

To explore and compare the Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US) and Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) to detect early arthropathy in moderate haemophilia.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, multicentre study covering Nordic patients with MHA and MHB. Arthropathy was evaluated by HEAD-US and HJHS 2.1.

RESULTS

We assessed 693 joints in 118 patients. HEAD-US scores (medians [interquartile ranges]) were as follows: elbows 0 points (0-0), knees 0 (0-0) and ankles 0 (0-1). Respectively, by HJHS: elbows 0 (0-1), knees 0 (0-1) and ankles 0 (0-1). Cartilage (14%) and bone (13%) were most commonly affected by HEAD-US. Frequent HJHS findings were crepitus on motion in knees (39%), and loss of flexion (23%) and extension (13%) in ankles. HEAD-US correlated strongly with HJHS (elbows r = .70, knees r = .60 and ankles r = .65), but 24% had discordant scores. Joints with HJHS zero points, 5% captured HEAD-US ≥1 point. Moreover, 26% had HJHS findings without HEAD-US pathology. Notably, 31% of knees had crepitus on motion and normal HEAD-US.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the joints attained low scores implying good joint health. HEAD-US correlated strongly with HJHS. In 5%, HEAD-US detected subclinical pathology. Crepitus on motion was frequently reported despite normal HEAD-US, thus not necessarily reflecting arthropathy. HEAD-US therefore improves the joint assessment in moderate haemophilia.

Evaluating international Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) results combined with expert opinion: Options for a shorter HJHS

Introduction

The Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) was developed to detect early changes in joint health in children and adolescents with haemophilia. The HJHS is considered by some to be too time consuming for clinical use and this may limit broad adoption.

Aim

This study was a first step to develop a shorter and/or more convenient version of the HJHS for the measurement of joint function in children and young adults with haemophilia, by combining real‐life data and expert opinion.

Methods

A cross‐sectional multicenter secondary analysis on pooled data of published studies using the HJHS (0‐124, optimum score 0) in persons with haemophilia A/B aged 4‐30 was performed. Least informative items, scoring options and/or joints were identified. An expert group of 19 international multidisciplinary experts evaluated the results and voted on suggestions for adaptations in a structured meeting (consensus set at ≥ 80%).

Results

Original data on 499 persons with haemophilia from 7 studies were evaluated. Median age was 15.0 years [range 4.0‐29.9], 83.2% had severe haemophilia and 61.5% received prophylaxis. Median (IQR) HJHS total was 6.0 (1.0‐17.0). The items 'duration swelling' and 'crepitus' were identified as clinically less informative and appointed as candidates for reduction.

Conclusion

Analysis of 499 children and young adults with haemophilia showed that the HJHS is able to discriminate between children and adults and different treatment regimens. Reduction of the items 'duration swelling' and 'crepitus' resulted in the HJHS_short, which had the same discriminative ability. Additional steps are needed to achieve a substantially shorter HJHS assessment.