Emicizumab prophylaxis in haemophilia patients older than 50 years with cardiovascular risk factors: Real-world data

Emicizumab prophylaxis in people with hemophilia A and inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Until recently, the treatment of people with hemophilia A and inhibitors (PwHAi) was based on the use of bypassing agents (BPA). However, the advent of emicizumab as prophylaxis has demonstrated promising results.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare the bleeding endpoints between PwHAi on BPA and those on emicizumab prophylaxis.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Systematic review of interventions and meta-analysis conducted at the Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.

METHODS

The CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Scopus, and LILACS databases were searched on February 21, 2023. Two authors conducted the literature search, publication selection, and data extraction. The selected publications evaluated the bleeding endpoints between PwHAi on emicizumab prophylaxis and those on BPA prophylaxis. The risk of bias was evaluated according to the Joanna Briggs Institute criteria. A meta-analysis was performed to determine the annualized bleeding rate (ABR) for treated bleeds.

RESULTS

Five publications (56 PwHAi) were selected from the 543 retrieved records. Overall, bleeding endpoints were lower during emicizumab prophylaxis than during BPA prophylaxis. All the publications had at least one risk of bias. The only common parameter for the meta-analysis was the ABR for treated bleeds. During emicizumab prophylaxis, the ABR for treated bleeds was lower than during BPA prophylaxis (standard mean difference: -1.58; 95% confidence interval -2.50, -0.66, P = 0.0008; I2 = 68.4%, P = 0.0031).

CONCLUSION

Emicizumab was superior to BPA in bleeding prophylaxis in PwHAi. However, both the small population size and potential risk of bias should be considered when evaluating these results.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

CRD42021278726, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=278726.

Exploring the effects of Factor Xa inhibitors on thrombin generation in people with haemophilia

Optimal management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in people with haemophilia (PWH) is a growing issue, given the continuing improvement in life expectancy among PWH. The evolving treatment paradigms targeting higher trough levels and the advent of non-factor replacement therapies (NFRT) means much of the 'protection' PWH were thought to have against CVD may be lost. There is a paucity of evidence regarding the safety of using anticoagulants in PWH. We designed a study assessing the thrombin generation (TG) of PWH of different severities and treatments, compared to non-haemophilia patients receiving a Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor (apixaban or rivaroxaban), healthy controls, and assessing TG parameters of adding FXa inhibitor to the plasma of PWH receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. In total, 40 patients were included. TG was initiated with 5pM tissue factor (TF) using the calibrated automated thrombinoscope. Compared to those with mild haemophilia, patients receiving a FXa inhibitor had higher endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) (1278.42 vs 1831.36) and velocity index (40.71 vs 112.56), but both had a similar peak height (154.0 vs 262.63) and time to peak (both 5.83). People with severe haemophilia receiving emicizumab had significantly improved TG parameters compared to those not receiving emicizumab - ETP 1678.11 vs 809.96 and peak height 233.8 vs 92.05; however, when FXa inhibitor was added their TG parameters deteriorated to the severe haemophilia range (ETP 1179.60 and peak height 103.05). TG may provide additional useful information regarding the use of anticoagulants in PWH.

Emicizumab is well tolerated and effective in people with congenital hemophilia A regardless of age, severity of disease, or inhibitor status: a scoping review

Background

With the treatment landscape continually evolving, it is vital that the hemophilia community have an overview of all published data for approved therapies, such as emicizumab, to support shared decision making.

Objectives

To bring together the clinical and real-world data for emicizumab use in people with congenital hemophilia A, regardless of age, disease severity, or factor VIII inhibitor status. Key focus areas were safety, efficacy, and quality of life (QoL).

Methods

This scoping review used citation databases (PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) and manual searches of abstract books. Publications reporting original data for emicizumab in people with hemophilia A, published in English after December 2014, and reporting select endpoints were included. This narrative synthesis focused on zero bleeds, treated annualized bleeding rate (ABR), adverse events, and QoL measures.

Results

Overall, 97 publications were included (cut-off: August 9, 2022). Treated ABR remained low (calculated mean and median treated ABRs ranged between 0.7-1.3 and 0.0-1.4, respectively), and the median percentage of people with zero treated bleeds was 66.7%. The proportion of people experiencing treatment-related adverse events ranged from 0.0% to 60.0%; most were injection-site reactions. Across 37 publications reporting on safety and enrolling >2300 individuals, 11 thrombotic events and 4 thrombotic microangiopathies were reported. Data from well-established tools show QoL benefits with emicizumab.

Conclusion

This scoping review consolidates the global published experience for emicizumab in people with hemophilia A and supports the fact that emicizumab has an acceptable safety profile, is effective and efficacious in bleed prevention, and is associated with improvements in QoL.

Safety of recombinant activated factor VII for treatment of breakthrough bleeds in patients with congenital haemophilia A and inhibitors receiving emicizumab prophylaxis: Review of the real-world evidence

BACKGROUND

Emicizumab is used as a subcutaneous prophylaxis for prevention of bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A (HA) with and without inhibitors. While low bleeding rates were observed in clinical trials, patients still experience breakthrough bleeds (BTBs) with emicizumab in the real-world. Current guidelines recommend use of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) for treatment of BTBs in patients with inhibitors. Due to thrombotic events observed in the HAVEN 1 study, activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) should be used with caution.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review is to identify and discuss real-world data on the frequency of BTBs and the safety of concomitant rFVIIa use in patients with inhibitors on emicizumab prophylaxis.

METHODS

A search of the following databases was conducted on 15 July 2022: BIOSIS Previews® , Current Contents Search® , Embase® , MEDLINE® . Search terms included 'real world', 'haemophilia A', and 'emicizumab'.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Eleven relevant publications were identified (seven original research articles and four congress abstracts). The frequency of BTBs specifically for HA patients with inhibitors was described in three publications with 5%-56% patients on emicizumab reporting ≥1 bleeding episode. Treatment of these BTBs appeared to be managed according to relevant guidelines. Importantly, no thrombotic complications occurred during concomitant rFVIIa use. Due to the nature of real-world studies, direct comparison of the results between studies is limited. However, real-world data show that BTBs in inhibitor patients during emicizumab prophylaxis can be safely treated with rFVIIa.

Emicizumab is efficacious in people with hemophilia A with comorbidities aged ≥50 years: analysis of 4 phase III trials

Background

The treatment of older people with hemophilia A (HA) can be complicated by comorbidities.

Objectives

This post hoc analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of emicizumab in people with HA aged ≥50 years with cardiovascular (CV) risk factors or HIV and/or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

Methods

The HAVEN 1 (NCT02622321), HAVEN 3 (NCT02847637), HAVEN 4 (NCT03020160), and STASEY (NCT03191799) studies enrolled adults/adolescents with severe HA. Participants were categorized as having a comorbidity if they had any CV risk factors (including history of CV disease, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, prior stroke, or obesity), HIV, and/or HCV infection. Efficacy and safety outcomes were compared by age (<50 vs ≥50 years).

Results

Of 504 participants at data cutoff, 408 were aged <50 years and 96 were aged ≥50 years. In people with HA aged <50 years, 26.7% had ≥1 CV risk factor and 29.4% had HIV and/or HCV infection. In people with HA aged ≥50 years, 72.9% had ≥1 CV risk factor and 74.0% had HIV and/or HCV infection. The mean (95% CI) annualized bleed rate for treated bleeds was 1.29 (0.07-6.06) for people with HA aged <50 years and 1.82 (0.19-6.93) for people with HA aged ≥50 years. No significant differences in annualized bleed rates were observed for those with comorbidities compared with those without. Safety outcomes were similar regardless of age.

Conclusion

This pooled analysis suggests that emicizumab efficacy and safety in people with HA aged ≥50 years with CV and HIV/HCV comorbidities were consistent with those in people with HA aged <50 years enrolled in the HAVEN 1, 3, and 4 and STASEY studies.

Non-clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B

BACKGROUND

Management of congenital hemophilia A and B is by prophylactic or on-demand replacement therapy with clotting factor concentrates. The effects of newer non-clotting factor therapies such as emicizumab, concizumab, marstacimab, and fitusiran compared with existing standards of care are yet to be systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects (clinical, economic, patient-reported, and adverse outcomes) of non-clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeding and bleeding-related complications in people with congenital hemophilia A or B compared with prophylaxis with clotting factor therapies, bypassing agents, placebo, or no prophylaxis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register, electronic databases, conference proceedings, and reference lists of relevant articles and reviews. The date of the last search was 16 August 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating people with congenital hemophilia A or B with and without inhibitors, who were treated with non-clotting factor therapies to prevent bleeds.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently reviewed studies for eligibility, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data for the primary outcomes (bleeding rates, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), adverse events) and secondary outcomes (joint health, pain scores, and economic outcomes). We assessed the mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI) of effect estimates, and evaluated the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

Six RCTs (including 397 males aged 12 to 75 years) were eligible for inclusion. Prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy in people with inhibitors Four trials (189 participants) compared emicizumab, fitusiran, and concizumab with on-demand therapy in people with inhibitors. Prophylaxis using emicizumab likely reduced annualized bleeding rates (ABR) for all bleeds (MD -22.80, 95% CI -37.39 to -8.21), treated bleeds (MD -20.40, 95% CI -35.19 to -5.61), and annualized spontaneous bleeds (MD -15.50, 95% CI -24.06 to -6.94), but did not significantly reduce annualized joint and target joint bleeding rates (AjBR and AtjBR) (1 trial; 53 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Fitusiran also likely reduced ABR for all bleeds (MD -28.80, 95% CI -40.07 to -17.53), treated bleeds (MD -16.80, 95% CI -25.80 to -7.80), joint bleeds (MD -12.50, 95% CI -19.91 to -5.09), and spontaneous bleeds (MD -14.80, 95% CI -24.90 to -4.71; 1 trial; 57 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No evidence was available on the effect of bleed prophylaxis using fitusiran versus on-demand therapy on AtjBR. Concizumab may reduce ABR for all bleeds (MD -12.31, 95% CI -19.17 to -5.45), treated bleeds (MD -10.10, 95% CI -17.74 to -2.46), joint bleeds (MD -9.55, 95% CI -13.55 to -5.55), and spontaneous bleeds (MD -11.96, 95% CI -19.89 to -4.03; 2 trials; 78 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but not target joint bleeds (MD -1.00, 95% CI -3.26 to 1.26). Emicizumab prophylaxis resulted in an 11.31-fold increase, fitusiran in a 12.5-fold increase, and concizumab in a 1.59-fold increase in the proportion of participants with no bleeds. HRQoL measured using the Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) physical and total health scores was improved with emicizumab, fitusiran, and concizumab prophylaxis (low-certainty evidence). Non-serious adverse events were higher with non-clotting factor therapies versus on-demand therapy, with injection site reactions being the most frequently reported adverse events. Transient antidrug antibodies were reported for fitusiran and concizumab. Prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy in people without inhibitors Two trials (208 participants) compared emicizumab and fitusiran with on-demand therapy in people without inhibitors. One trial assessed two doses of emicizumab (1.5 mg/kg weekly and 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly). Fitusiran 80 mg monthly, emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week, and emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly all likely resulted in a large reduction in ABR for all bleeds, all treated bleeds, and joint bleeds. AtjBR was not reduced with either of the emicizumab dosing regimens. The effect of fitusiran prophylaxis on target joint bleeds was not assessed. Spontaneous bleeds were likely reduced with fitusiran (MD -20.21, 95% CI -32.12 to -8.30) and emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly (MD -15.30, 95% CI -30.46 to -0.14), but not with emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week (MD -14.60, 95% CI -29.78 to 0.58). The percentage of participants with zero bleeds was higher following emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week (50% versus 0%), emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly (40% versus 0%), and fitusiran prophylaxis (40% versus 5%) compared with on-demand therapy. Emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week did not improve Haem-A-QoL physical and total health scores, EQ-5D-5L VAS, or utility index scores (low-certainty evidence) when compared with on-demand therapy at 25 weeks. Emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly may improve HRQoL measured by the Haem-A-QoL physical health score (MD -15.97, 95% CI -29.14 to -2.80) and EQ-5D-5L VAS (MD 9.15, 95% CI 2.05 to 16.25; 1 trial; 43 participants; low-certainty evidence). Fitusiran may result in improved HRQoL shown as a reduction in Haem-A-QoL total score (MD -7.06, 95% CI -11.50 to -2.62) and physical health score (MD -19.75, 95% CI -25.76 to -11.94; 1 trial; 103 participants; low-certainty evidence). The risk of serious adverse events in participants without inhibitors also likely did not differ following prophylaxis with either emicizumab or fitusiran versus on-demand therapy (moderate-certainty evidence). Transient antidrug antibodies were reported in 4% (3/80) participants to fitusiran, with no observed effect on antithrombin lowering. A comparison of the different dosing regimens of emicizumab identified no differences in bleeding, safety, or patient-reported outcomes. No case of treatment-related cancer or mortality was reported in any study group. None of the included studies assessed our secondary outcomes of joint health, clinical joint function, and economic outcomes. None of the included studies evaluated marstacimab.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from RCTs shows that prophylaxis using non-clotting factor therapies compared with on-demand treatment may reduce bleeding events, increase the percentage of individuals with zero bleeds, increase the incidence of non-serious adverse events, and improve HRQoL. Comparative assessments with other prophylaxis regimens, assessment of long-term joint outcomes, and assessment of economic outcomes will improve evidence-based decision-making for the use of these therapies in bleed prevention.

Management strategies in persons with inherited haemophilia requiring antithrombotic therapy: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Thromboembolic events are increasingly reported in the aging haemophilia population. The purpose of this study was to understand current practices and identify knowledge and research gaps in the management of persons with haemophilia requiring antithrombotic therapy for cardiovascular disorders (CVD) or venous thromboembolism (VTE).

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Scopus for studies reporting on more than two patients with inherited haemophilia A or B, without inhibitors, requiring antithrombotic therapy for CVD or VTE. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers and analysed using descriptive statistics and narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

We included 32 studies reporting on 432 persons with haemophilia. Three themes described the observed practice variation: (1) Difficulty weighing competing bleeding and thrombotic risks; (2) Tensions in providing standards of care and minimizing bleeding risk; (3) Advocacy for individualized strategies and multidisciplinary care. Different management strategies were used to treat persons with haemophilia in the setting of thromboembolic events, such as avoiding or choosing lower intensity antithrombotic therapy, or procedural alternatives to antithrombotic therapy. Initiation or alteration in haemostatic therapies along with antithrombotic therapy were common strategies and reported in 30 studies. However, data on target factor levels and bleeding and thrombotic events were largely missing.

DISCUSSION

Our scoping review highlights unmet needs in the management of an aging population of persons with haemophilia with increasing prevalence of CVD and VTE. Management is inconsistent and divergent from those of non-haemophilic patients. Prospective data are needed to inform optimal and evidence-based management strategies of CVD and VTE in persons with haemophilia.

Management of surgery in persons with hemophilia A receiving emicizumab prophylaxis: data from a national hemophilia treatment center

Background

Persons with hemophilia A may require surgical procedures. Real-world data on invasive procedures in persons with hemophilia A receiving emicizumab prophylaxis are limited.

Objectives

To evaluate the safety of invasive procedures in persons with hemophilia A receiving emicizumab prophylaxis and their outcomes in a longitudinally followed cohort.

Methods

Data from medical records of persons with hemophilia A with and without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors longitudinally followed at our tertiary center, who received emicizumab prophylaxis and underwent all types of invasive procedures, were retrieved. Outcomes of interest were bleeding and thrombotic complications.

Results

Overall, 35 patients underwent 56 invasive procedures, 18 (32.1%) were major. The median age was 36.3 years (IQR, 8.8-55.9 years); 12 patients (34.3%) were younger than 18 years at the time of procedure; 17 (48.6%) were patients with FVIII inhibitors. Among major procedures, orthopedic surgeries prevailed. All patients who underwent major procedures received factor replacement with either recombinant activated factor VII (patients with inhibitors) or FVIII (patients without inhibitors). Factor concentrates were administered prior to 32 (84.2%) of the minor procedures. Repeated doses were given according to international expert opinion recommendations and patients' condition.There were 7 bleeding events in 6 patients, 5 were major bleeds, including 1 patient who underwent a minor procedure without factor replacement. None of the patients experienced a thrombotic complication.

Conclusion

Invasive procedures can be performed safely in patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis with close surveillance after surgery. Factor concentrates may be advised in selected patients undergoing minor procedures.

Efficacy/effectiveness and safety of emicizumab prophylaxis of people with hemophilia A: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Emicizumab is a monoclonal antibody approved for prophylaxis against bleeds for people with hemophilia A (PwHA). A systematic review was conducted evaluating the efficacy/effectiveness and the safety of emicizumab as prophylaxis for PwHA compared to prophylaxis with factor VIII (FVIII) or bypassing agents (BPA), respectively in patients without and with inhibitors.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Database-directed search strategies were performed in Aug/26/2022 and updated in Mar/16/2023. Studies evaluating the prophylaxis with emicizumab versus prophylaxis with FVIII or BPA in PwHA without or with inhibitors, respectively, were selected by two independent reviewers. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Annualized bleeding rates for total treated bleeding events (ABR-all) were evaluated by meta-analysis. The quality of studies and certainty of evidence were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies were included. The standard mean differences for ABR-all were -0.6 (95%CI -1.0 to -0.2, p-value = 0.0002), among PwHA without inhibitors, and -1.7 (95%CI -2.4 to -0.9, p-value <0.00001), among PwHA with inhibitors. However, there was moderate heterogeneity in both meta-analyses. The most frequent adverse event was injection site reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Emicizumab prophylaxis was superior in reducing the ABR-all when compared with prophylaxis with FVIII or BPA.

A real-world evidence analysis of the impact of switching from factor VIII to emicizumab prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A without inhibitors

BACKGROUND

This study retrospectively compared annualized billed bleed rates (ABR_b) in people with hemophilia A (PwHA) without inhibitors who switched from factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis to emicizumab.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A real-world comparison study was performed on the effect of switching from FVIII to emicizumab prophylaxis in male, non-inhibitor patients on ABR_b using an all-payer claims database (APCD) dataset from 1 January 2014, to 31 March 2021. The identification period was from 1 November 2017, to 30 September 2020.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-one patients were included with a total of 82 and 45 bleeds in the pre- and post-switch periods, respectively. The average follow-up period pre-switch was 978.37 days (SD 555.03), whereas the average follow-up period post-switch was 522.26 days (SD 191.36). No significant differences in mean ABR_b were observed pre-/post-switch (0.25 and 0.20, respectively; P = 0.4456).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate no significant reduction in ABR_b, suggesting that switching from FVIII to emicizumab may not deliver incremental benefits to PwHA receiving prophylactic care.

Impact of switching prophylaxis treatment from factor VIII to emicizumab in hemophilia A patients without inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Factor VIII (FVIII) replacement and emicizumab are effective at preventing bleeds in patients with hemophilia A (HA). Though benefits of emicizumab among inhibitor patients with HA (PwHA) are well established, more real-world evidence among non-inhibitor patients is needed.

METHODS

Using a United States healthcare claims database, we compared billed annualized bleed rates (ABR_b) and the total cost of care (TCC) before and after switching from FVIII prophylaxis to emicizumab among non-inhibitor male PwHA. Bayesian inferences were used to assess the difference in ABR_b and TCC per patient per year (PPPY) pre versus post prophylaxis switch. We included 101 non-inhibitor male PwHA aged between 3 and 63 years old who switched from FVIII prophylaxis to emicizumab prophylaxis in 2018 or 2019.

RESULTS

The ABR_b increased from 0.52 to 0.62 (p = 0.83) after switch. The posterior probability of the mean ABR_b increasing after the switch was 75.54%. The TCC PPPY increased from $517,143 to $627,005 (p < 0.0001) after switch and the posterior probability of mean costs increasing after the switch was 99.80%.

CONCLUSIONS

Personalization of care through the identification of the most appropriate therapy for each patient can optimize clinical and economic outcomes. Future real-world evidence research could help establish the value of prophylactic options in targeted populations such as the non-inhibitor male PwHA.

Applicability of the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on the management of acute coronary syndromes to older people with haemophilia A - A modified Delphi consensus by the ADVANCE Working Group

INTRODUCTION

As people with haemophilia (PWH) receive better treatment and live longer they are more likely to encounter cardiovascular disease (CVD) and other comorbidities. ESC guidelines for the acute management of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are based on the non-haemophilia population.

AIM

To review the guidelines and propose relevant adaptations for PWHA without inhibitors who are treated with prophylaxis and present with ACS.

METHODS

As part of the ADVANCE Group, 20 European haemophilia experts used a modified Delphi approach to develop and gain consensus on proposed adaptations of the ESC guidelines for PWHA without inhibitors.

RESULTS

Of the 32 Class I recommendations across both guidelines, adaptions were considered necessary and proposed for 15. The adaptions highlight the need to provide sufficient FVIII trough levels at the time of antithrombotic treatment in people with haemophilia A (HA) without inhibitors. Patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis and requiring oral anticoagulation therapy or combined single antiplatelet plus oral anticoagulation therapy will require additional FVIII replacement therapy.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of high-quality clinical evidence, the combined expert opinion used to develop these adaptions to the current ESC guidelines may help to guide clinicians in their treatment decisions when a PWHA presents with ACS.

Absence of Effect of Emicizumab on D-Dimer Concentrations in Adult Patients with Severe Hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

The D-dimer (DD) assay is an essential biological test for the diagnosis and monitoring of thrombotic conditions. DD testing is usually not performed as part of the routine laboratory management of patients with hemophilia (PWH). There is an increasing concern about the risk of thrombotic complications in PWH, which is likely related to age, cardiovascular risk factors, invasive thrombogenic procedures, over-correction of Factor VIII (FVIII) or FIX, or administration of new therapeutic agents mimicking FVIII or rebalancing coagulation.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study sought to assess the basal DD levels in PWH treated prophylactically with FVIII, and to evaluate potential changes after switching to emicizumab.

METHOD

Patients over 18 years of age treated with emicizumab within a single center over the period 2017-2022 were included in the study.

RESULT

DD levels were measured in 40 adult PWH (37 severe/ three moderate / two with FVIII inhibitor) with a median age of 46 years (range: 19-82; Q1-Q3: 30,25-56,5), before and at least 3 months after emicizumab initiation. No significant changes were revealed, with DD median values of 257 ng/mL (range: 250-2876; Q1-Q3: 250-493,5) before and 250 ng/mL (range: 50-6205; Q1-Q3: 250-380,25) after the switch (p  =  0.9).

CONCLUSION

Most adult PWH on prophylaxis using FVIII display DD levels within the normal range, which remain unchanged after switching to emicizumab. In view of these reassuring results, monitoring of DDs at the start of emicizumab treatment does not appear necessary but could be considered when combined with other bypassing agents or high dose FVIII.

Thrombin generation assays to personalize treatment in bleeding and thrombotic diseases

Treatment of bleeding and thrombotic disorders is highly standardized and based on evidence-based medicine guidelines. These evidence-based treatment schemes are well accepted but may lead to either insufficient treatment or over-dosing, because the individuals' hemostatic properties are not taken into account. This can potentially introduce bleeding or thrombotic complications in individual patients. With the incorporation of pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) parameters, based on global assays such as thrombin generation assays (TGAs), a more personalized approach can be applied to treat either bleeding or thrombotic disorders. In this review, we will discuss the recent literature about the technical aspects of TGAs and the relation to diagnosis and management of bleeding and thrombotic disorders. In patients with bleeding disorders, such as hemophilia A or factor VII deficiency, TGAs can be used to identify patients with a more severe bleeding phenotype and also in the management with non-replacement therapy and/or bypassing therapy. These assays have also a role in patients with venous thrombo-embolism, but the usage of TGAs in patients with arterial thrombosis is less clear. However, there is a potential role for TGAs in the monitoring of (long-term) antithrombotic therapy, for example with the use of direct oral anticoagulants. Finally this review will discuss controversies, limitations and knowledge gaps in relation to the introduction of TGAs to personalize medicine in daily medical practice.

A real-world study comparing pre-post billed annualized bleed rates and total cost of care among non-inhibitor patients with hemophilia A switching from FVIII prophylaxis to emicizumab

OBJECTIVE

Factor VIII (FVIII) replacement and emicizumab have demonstrated efficacy for prevention of bleeds among patients with hemophilia A (PwHA) compared to on-demand (OD) use. Evidence investigating clinical outcomes and healthcare costs of non-inhibitor PwHA switching from prophylaxis with FVIII concentrates to emicizumab has not been well-established within large real-world datasets. This study aimed to investigate billed annualized bleed rates (ABR_b) and total cost of care (TCC) among non-inhibitor PwHA switching from FVIII-prophylaxis to emicizumab-prophylaxis.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study was conducted using IQVIA PharMetrics Plus, a US administrative claims database. The date of first claim for emicizumab was defined as the index date. OD patients and inhibitor patients were excluded. Bleeds were identified using a list of 535 diagnosis codes. Bayesian models were developed to estimate the probability ABR_b worsens and TCC increases after switching to emicizumab. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to test statistical significance of changes in ABR_b and TCC after switch.

RESULTS

Among the 121 identified patients, the difference in mean ABR_b between FVIII-prophylaxis (0.68 [SD = 1.28]) and emicizumab (0.55 [SD = 1.48]) was insignificant (p = .142). The mean annual TCC significantly increased for patients switching from FVIII-prophylaxis ($518,151 [SD = $289,934]) to emicizumab ($652,679 [SD = $340,126]; p < .0001). The Bayesian models estimated a 21.0% probability of the ABR_b worsening and a 99.9% probability of increasing TCC after switch.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that in male non-inhibitor PwHA, switching from FVIII prophylaxis to emicizumab incurs substantial cost increase with no significant benefit in ABR_b. This evidence may help guide providers, payers, and patients in shared decision-making conversations around best treatment options.

Emicizumab state-of-the-art update

Introduction

Emicizumab is a bispecific monoclonal antibody developed to address the unmet needs of clotting factor replacement therapy and has become the benchmark for optimal prophylaxis in managing patients with haemophilia A with inhibitors. We describe the emicizumab rollout and pharmacokinetic strategies and their use in paediatric patients.

Methods

The evolving real‐world experience in using emicizumab has confirmed its safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetic profile in paediatric, adolescent and adult patients receiving emicizumab at various prophylactic dosing regimens. The emicizumab current global rollout includes over 100 countries with 29 low to middle‐income countries accessing emicizumab through the World Federation of Haemophilia (WFH) Humanitarian Aid Program. The diversity of emicizumab dosing and pharmacokinetic tools such as the Calibra® and the WAPPS‐Hemo platforms make it possible to achieve prophylaxis goals in line with the WFH Haemophilia treatment guidelines recommendations, with minimal drug wastage. The emerging experience from long term clinical trials and long‐term real‐world follow‐up confirm the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic profile of emicizumab in paediatric haemophilia A patients. A few questions, including inhibitor recurrence, concurrent use of emicizumab with various replacement therapies and inhibitor eradication, are being addressed through multiple ongoing clinical studies.

Conclusion

The current global rollout of emicizumab is remarkable, and versatile dosing regimens and evolving pharmacokinetic tools such as the Calibra® and WAPPS‐Hemo platforms make it a treatment choice available also for pharmacokinetic guided personalised treatment. Data from paediatric studies are consistent with those seen in adolescent and adult Haemophilia A.

Cardiovascular disease in hereditary haemophilia: The challenges of longevity

The development of effective and safe treatments has significantly increased the life expectancy of persons with haemophilia (PWH). This has been accompanied by an increase in the comorbidities of ageing including cardiovascular disease, which poses particular challenges due to the opposing risks of bleeding from haemophilia and antithrombotic treatments versus thrombosis. Although mortality secondary to coronary artery disease in PWH is less than in the general population, the rate of atherosclerosis appears similar. The prevalence of atrial fibrillation in PWH and risk of secondary thromboembolic stroke are not well established. PWH can be safely supported through acute coronary interventions but data on the safety and efficacy of long-term antithrombotics are scarce. Increased awareness and research on cardiovascular disease in PWH will be crucial to improve primary prevention, acute management, secondary prevention and to best support ageing PWH.

Thrombin generation for monitoring hemostatic therapy in hemophilia A: A narrative review

Patients with severe hemophilia A (HA) have an increased risk of spontaneous and trauma-related bleeding because of a congenital absence of factor VIII (FVIII). Most severe HA patients use prophylactic FVIII concentrate, the effect of which can be monitored with FVIII activity level measurement. However, FVIII activity level is less valuable in predicting the potential clinical bleeding risk. Some patients still experience breakthrough bleeds despite adequate FVIII trough levels, whereas others do not bleed with trough levels below threshold. This difference may be caused by inter-individual differences in pro- and anticoagulant factors, the so-called hemostatic balance. Thrombin generation assays (TGAs) measure the hemostatic balance as a whole. Thereby, the TGAs may be a better tool in the guidance and monitoring of treatment in HA patients. In addition, TGAs offer the opportunity to determine the response to bypassing agents and treatment with non-factor replacement therapy, in which FVIII activity assays are not suitable for monitoring. This review summarizes the current knowledge about monitoring different HA treatment modalities by TGA, as a single treatment option and when used in a concomitant fashion.

Comparisons of global coagulation potential and bleeding episodes in emicizumab-treated hemophilia A patients and mild hemophilia A patients

Emicizumab reduces bleeding events in patients with severe hemophilia A (HA). The coagulation potential of emicizumab at a clinical dose appears to correspond to about 15 IU/dL of factor VIII activity (FVIII:C), the equivalent of converting from a severe to mild phenotype. However, the clinical and laboratory characteristics of HA patients receiving emicizumab (Emi-PwHA) compared with patients with mild HA (PwMHA) remain to be determined. We reviewed clinical data from Emi-PwHA (n = 63) and PwMHA (n = 15) and evaluated comprehensive coagulation function using Ca²⁺-triggered rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and ellagic acid/tissue factor-triggered clot waveform analysis (modified CWA). The median FVIII:C in PwMHA was 13.0 (IQR 8.5-17.0) IU/dL. Bleeding patterns in both groups were similar and classified into three categories: (1) spontaneous bleeding, post-traumatic, (2) bleeding within 1-2 days, and (3) delayed bleeding after 1-2 weeks. The coagulation potential in Emi-PwHA with and without breakthrough bleeds was comparable. Furthermore, coagulation function in Emi-PwHA was equivalent to PwMHA, although time between treatment and hospitalization for breakthrough bleeds in PwMHA appeared to be longer than those in Emi-PwHA. The coagulation potential and bleeding patterns appeared to be similar in Emi-PwHA and PwMHA, indicating that emicizumab-driven coagulation potential reflected mild HA.

Early real-world experience with emicizumab and concomitant factor VIII replacement products in adult males with Hemophilia A without inhibitors

AIMS

To assess real-world use of emicizumab in adult people with hemophilia A (PwHA) without inhibitors including healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult, male PwHA without inhibitors initiating emicizumab (index date) were identified using IBM MarketScan after 4 October 2016. Patients were required to have continuous health insurance coverage for ≥180 days prior to and ≥90 days after index date and have ≥90 days of continuous use of emicizumab. Patients were followed until treatment gap, disenrollment, or end of data. Results were reported overall and among a subgroup with prior factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis. Emicizumab use, concomitant FVIII treatment use, HCRU, and costs were assessed separately over baseline, the emicizumab induction period, emicizumab maintenance period, and annualized.

RESULTS

Among the 71 emicizumab patients (FVIII prophylaxis subgroup: 52) included in the study, the mean age was 35 (subgroup: 34) years and mean follow-up was 12 (subgroup: 11.1) months. At baseline, the annualized mean total healthcare cost was $532,948 (subgroup: $645,727). After emicizumab initiation, per-patient-per-month (PPPM) HCRU was higher in the emicizumab induction period compared to the maintenance period with higher monthly FVIII fills/in-office administrations (0.37 vs 0.17), non-FVIII outpatient visits (2.23 vs 1.55), and emergency department visits (0.06 vs 0.03). The FVIII prophylaxis subgroup yielded similar HCRU trends. Hemophilia treatment costs accounted for over 95% of total healthcare costs. The annualized mean cost was $50,491 (subgroup: $61,512) for concomitant FVIII treatment and $777,171 (subgroup: $793,168) for emicizumab and concomitant FVIII treatment for the first year of emicizumab treatment.

CONCLUSION

This study represented experience with emicizumab after the approval for PwHA without inhibitors. The study cohort may not be representative of all PwHA taking emicizumab. The findings highlight the continued burden of treatment and healthcare cost for PwHA without inhibitors despite advances in treatment options.

Real-World Data on Bleeding Patterns of Hemophilia A Patients Treated with Emicizumab

Emicizumab (Hemlibra™) is approved for prophylaxis of hemophilia A (HA) patients. The HAVEN studies addressed bleeding reduction in emicizumab-treated patients, but real-world data on bleeding patterns during emicizumab therapy are lacking. We aimed to compare the occurrence of breakthrough bleeding at different time points, starting from emicizumab initiation. This longitudinal prospective observational cohort study included HA patients (n = 70, aged 1 month to 74.9 years) that completed at least 18 months of follow-up in our center. We analyzed the number of spontaneous and traumatic bleeds during selected time points of the study (“bleeding periods”). The percentage of traumatic and spontaneous bleeding episodes was not significantly different among “bleeding periods” (P = 0.053 and P = 0.092, respectively). Most trauma-related treated bleeds resulted from either hemarthrosis (53%) or head trauma (33%). Spontaneous bleeding episodes were mostly hemarthroses (80%). Potential associations of the patients’ age, annualized bleeding rate before emicizumab treatment, and the presence of inhibitors with spontaneous bleed occurrence were analyzed with binomial logistic regression. The odds of bleeding while on emicizumab increased by a factor of 1.029 (P = 0.034) for every one year of age. Conclusions: Our real-world data revealed that the risk of bleeding persists, especially in older patients, despite therapy with emicizumab. These data may help clinicians in counselling their patients and in planning their management.

Emicizumab prophylaxis: Prospective longitudinal real-world follow-up and monitoring

INTRODUCTION

Real-world data on prophylaxis of severe haemophilia A (HA) patients treated by emicizumab are scarce.

AIM

To study the efficacy and safety of longitudinal emicizumab prophylaxis and assess laboratory monitoring correlations in a large patient cohort.

METHODS

HA patients with and without FVIII inhibitors, initiating emicizumab prophylaxis, were prospectively enrolled. Bleeding, adverse events and surgeries were documented. FVIII inhibitors, emicizumab levels and thrombin generation (TG) were sequentially measured.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients, including 58 children (whose median (IQR) age was 6 (1-11) years) with severe HA, composed the study cohort. Twenty-nine per cent (31/107) of our HA patients had FVIII inhibitors. Patients were followed for a median of 67 weeks (up to 144 weeks). Fifty-three patients, whose median follow-up was 53 weeks, experienced zero bleeds. Most bleeds (94%) among children were trauma-related, whereas 61% of adults sustained spontaneous joint bleeds. Four patients experienced major bleeds, with a fatal outcome in one infant, who also presented with central venous line thrombosis. No other serious adverse events were encountered. Seven patients have decided to stop emicizumab treatment for various reasons. Emicizumab plasma levels increased after emicizumab prophylaxis initiation, and values were maintained during follow-up, in all but one patient, suspected of anti-drug antibodies. A significant reduction of FVIII inhibitor levels was noted among inhibitor patients. TG was increased and sustained yet could not prognosticate bleeding risk.

CONCLUSION

Emicizumab prophylaxis was mostly well tolerated, although 50% of patients experienced breakthrough bleeds. Routine TG monitoring is not obligatory, and further studies are warranted in selected patient populations.