Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of bleeding outcomes in severe haemophilia A: Comparing valoctocogene roxaparvovec gene therapy, emicizumab prophylaxis, and FVIII replacement prophylaxis

Gene therapy for hemophilia - From basic science to first approvals of "one-and-done" therapies

Realistic paths to gene therapy for the X-linked bleeding disorder hemophilia started to materialize in the mid 1990s, resulting in disease correction in small and large animal models. Out of a diversity of approaches, in vivo adeno-associated viral (AAV) gene transfer to hepatocytes emerged as the most promising strategy, eventually forming the basis for multiple advanced clinical trials and regulatory approval of two products for the treatment of hemophilia B (coagulation factor IX deficiency) and one for hemophilia A (factor VIII deficiency). Ideally, gene therapy is effective with a single administration, thus providing therapeutic factor levels over a period of years, without the need for frequent injections. Overcoming multiple obstacles, some not predicted by preclinical studies, sustained partial to complete correction of coagulation for several years to an entire decade has now been documented in patients, with observation ongoing. A hyperactive form of FIX improved efficacy in hemophilia B, and superior engineered variants of FVIII are emerging. Nonetheless, challenges remain, including pre-existing immunity to AAV capsids, toxicities, inter-patient variability in response to treatment, and difficulty in obtaining durable therapeutic expression of FVIII. In alternative approaches, in vivo gene editing and ex vivo gene therapies targeting hemopoietic cells are in development.

Gene Therapy in Hemophilia A: Achievements, Challenges, and Perspectives

Strides in advancements of care of persons with hemophilia include development of long-acting factor replacement therapies, novel substitution and hemostatic rebalancing agents, and most recently approved gene therapy. Several decades of preclinical and clinical trials have led to development of adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector-mediated gene transfer for endogenous production of factor VIII (FVIII) in hemophilia A (HA). Only one gene therapy product for HA (valoctocogene roxaparvovec) has been approved by regulatory authorities. Results of valoctocogene roxaparvovec trial show significant improvement in bleeding rates and use of factor replacement therapy; however, sustainability and duration of response show variability with overall decline in FVIII expression over time. Further challenges include untoward adverse effects involving liver toxicity requiring immunosuppression and development of neutralizing antibodies to AAV vector rendering future doses ineffective. Real-life applicability of gene therapy for HA will require appropriate patient screening, infrastructure setup, long-term monitoring including data collection of patient-reported outcomes and innovative payment schemes. This review article highlights the success and development of HA gene therapy trials, challenges including adverse outcomes and variability of response, and perspectives on approach to gene therapy including shared decision-making and need for future strategies to overcome the several unmet needs.

Transforming Hemophilia A Care: Insights into New Therapeutic Options

Hemophilia A is a hereditary bleeding disorder characterized by a deficiency in clotting factor VIII, leading to significant morbidity and a reduced quality of life. This review provides an updated overview of the current understanding of hemophilia A, highlighting its genetic underpinnings and advancements in treatment strategies. A literature review was conducted using various available databases. Relevant studies on hemophilia A, covering genetics and treatment options, were selected and summarized. Recent developments in gene therapy are discussed, showcasing their potential to offer long-term solutions and reduce the burden of treatment. Additionally, the review addresses global disparities in care and policy implications, emphasizing the need for comprehensive healthcare frameworks to improve outcomes for individuals living with hemophilia A worldwide. By synthesizing recent findings and insights, this review aims to inform clinicians and policymakers about the evolving landscape of hemophilia A management and the necessity for equitable access to care.

Roctavian gene therapy for hemophilia A

ABSTRACT

After successful efforts in adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene addition for hemophilia B gene therapy, the development of valoctocogene roxaparvovec (Roctavian; Biomarin) over the past decade represents a potential new hemophilia A (HA) treatment paradigm. Roctavian is the first licensed HA gene therapy that was conditionally approved in Europe in August 2022 and approved in the United States in June 2023. Beyond Roctavian, there are ongoing pivotal trials of additional AAV vectors for HA, others that are progressing through preclinical development or early-phase clinical trial, as well as non-AAV approaches in clinical development. This review focuses on the clinical development of Roctavian for which the collective clinical trials represent the largest body of work thus far available for any licensed AAV product. From this pioneering clinical development, several outstanding questions have emerged for which the answers will undoubtedly be important to the clinical adaptation of Roctavian and future efforts in HA gene therapy. Most notably, unexplained year-over-year declines in factor VIII (FVIII) expression after Roctavian treatment contrast with stable FVIII expression observed in other AAV HA gene therapy clinical trials with more modest initial FVIII expression. This observation has been qualitatively replicated in animal models that may permit mechanistic study. The development and approval of Roctavian is a landmark in HA therapeutics, although next-generation approaches are needed before HA gene therapy fulfills its promise of stable FVIII expression that normalizes hemostasis.

Comparative Effectiveness of Valoctocogene Roxaparvovec and Prophylactic Factor VIII Replacement in Severe Hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

A prospective, non-interventional study (270-902) followed 294 adults with severe hemophilia A (SHA) receiving prophylactic factor VIII (FVIII). From these participants, 112 rolled over into a single-arm, multicenter, phase 3 trial (GENEr8-1; NCT03370913) that evaluated efficacy and safety of valoctocogene roxaparvovec, a gene therapy that provides endogenous FVIII in individuals with SHA. Participants from 270-902 who did not roll over provide an opportunity for a contemporaneous external control. Therefore, the comparative effectiveness of valoctocogene roxaparvovec vs FVIII prophylaxis was evaluated using propensity scoring (PS).

METHODS

This post hoc analysis compared 112 participants from GENEr8-1 (treated cohort) to 73 participants in 270-902 who did not enroll in GENEr8-1 (control cohort). The primary analysis used standardized mortality ratio weighting to re-weight baseline characteristics of the control cohort to better match the treated cohort. Mean annualized bleeding rates (ABR) for treated and all bleeds were compared between cohorts along with the proportion of participants with zero bleeds (treated and all bleeds). Sensitivity and scenario analyses were also conducted.

RESULTS

PS adjustments reduced differences in baseline characteristics between cohorts. Mean treated (4.40 vs 0.85; P < 0.001) and all (5.01 vs 1.54; P < 0.001) ABR were significantly lower, and the proportions of participants with zero treated bleeds (82.1% vs 32.9%; P < 0.001) and all bleeds (58.0% vs 28.5%; P < 0.001) were significantly higher in GENEr8-1.

CONCLUSIONS

PS-adjusted analyses were consistent with prior intra-individual comparisons. Compared with participants receiving prophylactic FVIII, the participants receiving valoctocogene roxaparvovec experienced lower ABR, and a higher proportion had zero bleeds.

TRAIL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03370913.