Early withdrawal and non-withdrawal death in the months following hemodialysis initiation: A retrospective cohort analysis

Health inequities in dialysis care: A scoping review

MAIN PROBLEM

We aim to look at potential gaps in current dialysis literature on inequities and explore future research that could contribute to more equitable care.

METHODS

Following guidelines from the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), we conducted a scoping review of health inequities in dialysis. PubMed and Ovid Embase were searched in July 2022 for articles published between 2016 and 2022 that examined at least one of the following NIH defined health inequities: race/ethnicity, sex/gender, LGBTQ+ identity, underserved rural populations, education level, income, and occupation status. Frequencies of each health inequity as well as trends over time of the four most examined inequities were analyzed.

RESULTS

In our sample of 69 included studies, gaps were identified in LGBTQ+ identity and patient education. Inequities pertaining to race/ethnicity, sex/gender, underserved rural populations, and income were sufficiently reported. No trends between inequities investigated over time were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Our scoping review examined current literature on health inequities pertaining to dialysis and found gaps concerning LGBTQ+ and patients with lower levels of education. To help fill these gaps, and possibly alleviate additional burden to these patients, we recommend cultural competency training for providers and dialysis center staff as well as community-based educational programs to improve dialysis patients' health literacy.

Parameters affecting prognosis after hemodialysis withdrawal: experience from a single center

INTRODUCTION

Withdrawal from maintenance hemodialysis is unavoidable in some patients due to their poor general condition; however, their survival days vary depending on their health status. The factors associated with life prognosis in the terminal phase in patients undergoing hemodialysis remain unclear.

METHODS

Patients who died after withdrawal from hemodialysis between 2011 and 2021 at Nagasaki Renal Center were included. Patient background data were collected, and the association between the patients' clinical features and survival duration was analyzed.

RESULTS

The withdrawal group included 174 patients (79.8 ± 10.8 years old; 50.6% male; median dialysis vintage, 3.6 years). The most common reason for withdrawal (95%) was that hemodialysis was more harmful than beneficial because of the patient's poor general condition. The median time from withdrawal to death was 4 days (interquartile range, 3-10 days). Multivariable Cox proportional regression analysis showed that oral nutrition (hazard ratio (HR), 1.98; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.12-3.50; P = 0.03), hypoxemia (HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.55-3.47; P < 0.01), ventilator use (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.11-0.58; P < 0.01), and pleural effusion (HR, 1.54; CI, 1.01-2.37; P = 0.04) were associated with increased survival duration. In contrast, antibiotics and vasopressor administration were not associated with the survival duration.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we explored the parameters affecting the survival of patients who withdrew from hemodialysis. Physicians could use our results to establish more accurate predictions, which may help the patient and their family to emotionally accept and implement the desired care plan.

Changing landscape of dialysis withdrawal in patients with kidney failure: Implications for clinical practice

Dialysis withdrawal has become an accepted treatment option for patients with kidney failure and is one of the leading causes of death in patients receiving dialysis in high-income countries. Despite its increasing acceptance, dialysis withdrawal currently lacks a clear, consistent definition. The processes and outcomes of dialysis withdrawal have wide temporal and geographical variability, attributed to dialysis patient selection, influence from cultural, religious and spiritual beliefs, and availability of kidney replacement therapy and conservative kidney management. As a complex, evolving process, dialysis withdrawal poses an enormous challenge for clinicians and healthcare teams with various limitations precluding a peaceful and smooth transition between active dialysis and end-of-life care. In this review, we examine the current definitions of dialysis withdrawal, the temporal and geographical patterns of dialysis withdrawal, international barriers in the decision-making process (including dialysis withdrawal during the COVID-19 pandemic), and gaps in the current dialysis withdrawal recommendations for clinical consideration and future studies.

Prescribing Patterns of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

The association of patient and prescriber characteristics with use of warfarin versus direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) is not well studied.

METHODS

The 20% Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Parts A, B, and D claims data from 2010 to 2017 were used to identify patients with stage 3, 4, or 5 CKD and AF who received a DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban) or warfarin. Prescribers were categorized as cardiologists, primary care providers (PCPs), and others. Using logistic regression, we estimated odds ratios (ORs) for the association of baseline characteristics and prescriber specialty with first use of a DOAC, relative to warfarin.

RESULTS

We identified 22,739 individuals with CKD who were newly initiated on oral anticoagulation for AF. New DOAC prescriptions increased from 490 in 2011 to 3261 in 2017, and displaced warfarin over time (1849, 2011; 945, 2017). By Q4 of 2014, cardiologists prescribed DOACs as initial treatment more frequently than warfarin, but non-cardiologists did not do so until 2015. As of 2017, apixaban was the most widely prescribed anticoagulant, comprising 56% and 50% of prescriptions by cardiologists and non-cardiologists, respectively. PCPs (OR 0.54, 0.51-0.58) and other providers (OR 0.55, 0.51-0.59) were less likely than cardiologists to prescribe DOACs.

CONCLUSIONS

DOAC prescriptions, particularly apixaban, increased over time and gradually displaced warfarin. The total number of patients with AF and CKD receiving anticoagulation increased over time. Cardiologists increased DOAC prescriptions more rapidly than non-cardiologists.

Perimortem changes in clinical parameters in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis

Background

End-of-life medical care for patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (HD) therapy has become an increasingly important issue worldwide. Thus far, no clear indicators and/or biomarkers exist regarding the timing of HD therapy withdrawal.

Methods

To clarify the perimortem circumstances, we examined temporal changes in multiple clinical parameters during the last 10 serial HD sessions of 65 terminal patients with end-stage renal disease who had undergone maintenance HD and died in our hospital.

Results

The results showed that, while most of the laboratory data were unaltered, the physical parameters, such as systolic blood pressure and consciousness levels, gradually and significantly deteriorated toward the last HD session prior to death. The frequency of the use of vasopressors and O2 inhalation tended to increase. The accumulation of such severe conditions was observed at the last HD session. Of interest, the accumulation of severe conditions at the last HD session in patients with malignancies was significantly less than those with cardiovascular diseases or infectious diseases. The accumulation of severe conditions at the last HD session did not differ between patients who withdrew HD versus those who continued HD.

Conclusion

The results of the present study suggest that predicting the timing of maintenance HD therapy withdrawal is likely to be difficult and that the timing of maintenance HD therapy termination may differ among patient groups with distinct comorbid conditions.

Temporal changes and risk factors of death from early withdrawal within 12 months of dialysis initiation - a cohort study

Background

Mortality risk is high soon after dialysis initiation in patients with kidney failure, and dialysis withdrawal is a major cause of early mortality, attributed to psychosocial or medical reasons. The temporal trends and risk factors associated with cause-specific early dialysis withdrawal within 12 months of dialysis initiation remain uncertain.

Methods

Using data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, we examined the temporal trends and risk factors associated with mortality attributed to early psychosocial and medical withdrawals in incident adult dialysis patients in Australia between 2005 and 2018 using adjusted competing risk analyses.

Results

Of 32 274 incident dialysis patients, 3390 (11%) experienced death within 12 months post-dialysis initiation. Of these, 1225 (36%) were attributed to dialysis withdrawal, with 484 (14%) psychosocial withdrawals and 741 (22%) medical withdrawals. These patterns remained unchanged over the past two decades. Factors associated with increased risk of death from early psychosocial and medical withdrawals were older age, dialysis via central venous catheter, late referral and the presence of cerebrovascular disease; obesity and Asian ethnicity were associated with decreased risk. Risk factors associated with early psychosocial withdrawals were underweight and higher socioeconomic status. Presence of peripheral vascular disease, chronic lung disease and cancers were associated with early medical withdrawals.

Conclusions

Death from dialysis withdrawal accounted for >30% of early deaths in kidney failure patients initiated on dialysis and remained unchanged over the past two decades. Several shared risk factors were observed between mortality attributed to early psychosocial and medical withdrawals.

Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Medicare Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Atrial Fibrillation

Background and Purpose:

The comparative effectiveness of direct-acting oral anticoagulants, compared with warfarin, for risks of stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, or death have not been studied in Medicare beneficiaries with atrial fibrillation and nondialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease.

Methods:

Medicare data from 2011 to 2017 were used to identify patients with stages 3, 4, or 5 chronic kidney disease and new atrial fibrillation who received a new prescription for warfarin, apixaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran. We estimated marginal hazard ratios with 95% CIs for the association of each direct-acting oral anticoagulant, compared with warfarin, for the outcomes of interest using inverse-probability-of-treatment weighted Cox proportional hazards models in as-treated and intention-to-treat analyses.

Results:

A total of 22 739 individuals met criteria (46.3% warfarin, 29.6% apixaban, 17.2% rivaroxaban, 6.9% dabigatran). Across the groups of anticoagulant users, mean age was 78.4 to 79.0 years; 50.3% to 51.4% were women, and 80.3% to 82.8% had stage 3 chronic kidney disease. In the as-treated analysis, for stroke/systemic embolism, hazard ratios, all compared with warfarin, were 0.70 (0.51–0.96) for apixaban, 0.80 (0.54–1.17) for rivaroxaban, and 1.15 (0.69–1.94) for dabigatran. For major bleeding, analogous hazard ratios were 0.47 (0.37–0.59) for apixaban, 1.05 (0.85–1.30) for rivaroxaban, and 0.95 (0.70–1.31) for dabigatran. There was no difference in the risk of all-cause mortality between the direct-acting oral anticoagulants and warfarin. Results of the intention-to-treat analysis were similar.

Conclusions:

Apixaban, compared with warfarin, was associated with decreased risk of stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding; risks for both outcomes with rivaroxaban and dabigatran did not differ from risks with warfarin.