1
|
Tan JT, Cheung CL, Cheung KS. Relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection, osteoporosis, and fracture. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 39:2006-2017. [PMID: 39375877 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 10/09/2024]
Abstract
Osteoporotic fracture is a prevalent noncommunicable disease globally, causing significant mortality, morbidity, and disability. As the population ages, the healthcare and economic burden of osteoporotic fracture is expected to increase further. Due to its multifactorial features, the development of osteoporotic fracture involves a complex interplay of multiple risk factors, including genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors. Helicobacter pylori, which infects approximately 43% of the world's population, has been associated with increased fracture risk due to hypochlorhydria from atrophic gastritis and systemic inflammation from elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines. However, the potential impact of H. pylori infection and eradication on fracture risk remains contentious among various studies due to the study design and inadequate adjustment of confounding factors including baseline gastritis phenotype. In this review, we provided a comprehensive evaluation of the current evidence focusing on the underlying mechanisms and clinical evidence of the association between H. pylori infection and osteoporotic fracture. We also discussed the potential benefits of H. pylori eradication on fracture risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Tong Tan
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ching Lung Cheung
- Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
- Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health Limited (D24H), Hong Kong Science Park, Pak Shek Kok, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Ka Shing Cheung
- Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guo CG, Jiang F, Li Y, Chen Y, Wu J, Zhang S, Leung WK. Real-world efficacy of second-line therapies for Helicobacter pylori: a population-based study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2024; 79:2263-2272. [PMID: 38973619 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkae224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2024] [Accepted: 06/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the increasing prevalence of antibiotic resistance, real-world data on the optimal empirical second-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori are still limited. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the real-world efficacy of various second-line therapies for H. pylori. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of all H. pylori-infected patients who had received the second-line treatment after the failure of primary clarithromycin triple therapy in Hong Kong between 2003 and 2018. The retreatment success rates of different second-line therapies were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 7591 patients who received second-line treatment were included. Notably, the most commonly prescribed regimen was still clarithromycin triple therapy, but the frequency of use had decreased from 59.5% in 2003-06 to 28.7% in 2015-18. Concomitant non-bismuth quadruple therapy had emerged as the commonest regimen (from 3.3% to 43.9%). In a validation analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of retreatment-inferred second-line treatment failure were 88.3% and 97.1%, respectively. The overall success rate of second-line therapies was 73.6%. Bismuth quadruple therapy had the highest success rate of 85.6%, while clarithromycin triple therapy had the lowest success rate of 63.5%. Specifically, bismuth/metronidazole/tetracycline quadruple, metronidazole/tetracycline triple, levofloxacin/metronidazole/tetracycline quadruple, rifabutin/amoxicillin triple and amoxicillin/levofloxacin triple therapies had relatively higher success rates over 80%. Age, treatment duration, baseline conditions and first-line treatment used were associated with success rate. CONCLUSIONS Bismuth quadruple therapy was the most effective second-line regimen for H. pylori in this real-world study. Despite a very low success rate, clarithromycin-containing triple therapies were still commonly used as second-line regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuan-Guo Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology, State Key Laboratory for Digestive Health, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
- Department of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Fang Jiang
- Department of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Yueyue Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250012, Shandong, China
| | - Yijun Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, State Key Laboratory for Digestive Health, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Jialin Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, State Key Laboratory for Digestive Health, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Shutian Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, State Key Laboratory for Digestive Health, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
| | - Wai K Leung
- Department of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang TT, Cao YX, Cao L. Novel therapeutic regimens against Helicobacter pylori: an updated systematic review. Front Microbiol 2024; 15:1418129. [PMID: 38912349 PMCID: PMC11190606 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1418129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a strict microaerophilic bacterial species that exists in the stomach, and H. pylori infection is one of the most common chronic bacterial infections affecting humans. Eradicating H. pylori is the preferred method for the long-term prevention of complications such as chronic gastritis, peptic ulcers, gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, and gastric cancer. However, first-line treatment with triple therapy and quadruple therapy has been unable to cope with increasing antibacterial resistance. To provide an updated review of H. pylori infections and antibacterial resistance, as well as related treatment options, we searched PubMed for articles published until March 2024. The key search terms were "H. pylori", "H. pylori infection", "H. pylori diseases", "H. pylori eradication", and "H. pylori antibacterial resistance." Despite the use of antimicrobial agents, the annual decline in the eradication rate of H. pylori continues. Emerging eradication therapies, such as the development of the new strong acid blocker vonoprazan, probiotic adjuvant therapy, and H. pylori vaccine therapy, are exciting. However, the effectiveness of these treatments needs to be further evaluated. It is worth mentioning that the idea of altering the oxygen environment in gastric juice for H. pylori to not be able to survive is a hot topic that should be considered in new eradication plans. Various strategies for eradicating H. pylori, including antibacterials, vaccines, probiotics, and biomaterials, are continuously evolving. A novel approach involving the alteration of the oxygen concentration within the growth environment of H. pylori has emerged as a promising eradication strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting-Ting Huang
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Science, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yong-Xiao Cao
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Science, Xi’an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Lei Cao
- Precision Medical Institute, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jonaitis P, Nyssen OP, Saracino IM, Fiorini G, Vaira D, Pérez-Aísa Á, Tepes B, Castro-Fernandez M, Pabón-Carrasco M, Keco-Huerga A, Voynovan I, Lucendo AJ, Lanas Á, Martínez-Domínguez SJ, Almajano EA, Rodrigo L, Vologzanina L, Brglez Jurecic N, Denkovski M, Bujanda L, Mahmudov U, Leja M, Lerang F, Babayeva G, Bordin DS, Gasbarrini A, Kupcinskas J, Gridnyev O, Rokkas T, Marcos-Pinto R, Phull PS, Smith SM, Tonkić A, Boltin D, Buzás GM, Šembera Š, Şimşek H, Matysiak-Budnik T, Milivojevic V, Marlicz W, Venerito M, Boyanova L, Doulberis M, Capelle LG, Cano-Català A, Moreira L, Mégraud F, O'Morain C, Gisbert JP, Jonaitis L. Comparison of the management of Helicobacter pylori infection between the older and younger European populations. Sci Rep 2023; 13:17235. [PMID: 37821503 PMCID: PMC10567783 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-43287-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori remains high in the older population. Specific age-related peculiarities may impact the outcomes of H. pylori treatment. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostics and effectiveness of H. pylori eradication between the younger and older European populations. "European Registry on H. pylori Management (Hp-EuReg)" data from 2013 to 2022 were analyzed. Patients were divided into older (≥ 60 years) and younger (18-59 years) groups. Modified intention-to-treat (mITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis was performed. 49,461 patients included of which 14,467 (29%) were older-aged. Concomitant medications and penicillin allergy were more frequent among the older patients. Differences between younger and older populations were observed in treatment duration in first-line treatment and in proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) doses in second-line treatment. The overall incidence of adverse events was lower in the older adults group. The overall first-line treatment mITT effectiveness was 88% in younger and 90% in the older patients (p < 0.05). The overall second-line mITT treatment effectiveness was 84% in both groups. The effectiveness of the most frequent first- and second-line triple therapies was suboptimal (< 90%) in both groups. Optimal efficacy (≥ 90%) was achieved by using bismuth and non-bismuth-based quadruple therapies. In conclusion, the approach to the diagnostics and treatment of H. pylori infection did not generally differ between younger and older patients. Main differences were reported in the concurrent medications, allergy to penicillin and adverse events both in first- and second-line treatment. Optimal effectiveness rates were mostly achieved by using bismuth and non-bismuth-based quadruple therapies. No clinically relevant differences in the effectiveness between the age groups were observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulius Jonaitis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 50161, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Olga P Nyssen
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Diego de León, 62, 28006, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Ilaria Maria Saracino
- Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, IRCCS AOUBO, University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Fiorini
- Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, IRCCS AOUBO, University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy
| | - Dino Vaira
- Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, IRCCS AOUBO, University of Bologna, 40138, Bologna, Italy
| | - Ángeles Pérez-Aísa
- Agencia Sanitaria Costa del Sol, Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), 29651, Marbella, Spain
| | - Bojan Tepes
- Department of Gastroenterology, AM DC Rogaska, 3250, Rogaska Slatina, Slovenia
| | | | | | - Alma Keco-Huerga
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital de Valme, 41014, Seville, Spain
| | - Irina Voynovan
- Department of Gastroenterology, A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, 111123, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alfredo J Lucendo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital General de Tomelloso, 13700, Tomelloso, Spain
| | - Ángel Lanas
- IIS Aragón y Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009, Zaragoza, Spain
| | | | | | - Luis Rodrigo
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33011, Oviedo, Spain
| | | | - Natasa Brglez Jurecic
- Department of Gastroenterology, Interni Oddelek, Diagnostic Centre, 4260, Bled, Slovenia
| | - Maja Denkovski
- Department of Gastroenterology, Interni Oddelek, Diagnostic Centre, 4260, Bled, Slovenia
| | - Luis Bujanda
- Hospital Donostia, Instituto Biodonostia, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU), 20018, San Sebastián, Spain
| | | | - Mārcis Leja
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Diseases Centre Gastro, Institute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, University of Latvia, Riga, 1079, Latvia
| | - Frode Lerang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Østfold Hospital Trust, 1714, Grålum, Norway
| | | | - Dmitry S Bordin
- Department of Gastroenterology, A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, 111123, Moscow, Russia
- A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, 127473, Moscow, Russia
- Tver State Medical University, 170100, Tver, Russia
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Medicina Interna, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Juozas Kupcinskas
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 50161, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Oleksiy Gridnyev
- Government Institution "L.T.Malaya Therapy National Institute of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine", Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Theodore Rokkas
- Department of Gastroenterology, Henry Dunant Hospital, 115 26, Athens, Greece
| | - Ricardo Marcos-Pinto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar do Porto Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde, University of Porto, 4050-313, Porto, Portugal
| | - Perminder S Phull
- Department of Gastroenterology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN, UK
| | - Sinead M Smith
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, D02PN40, Ireland
| | - Ante Tonkić
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Split, University of Split School of Medicine, 21000, Split, Croatia
| | - Doron Boltin
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 49100, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - György Miklós Buzás
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ferencváros Health Centre, 1095, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Štěpán Šembera
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, University Hospital and Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, 500 03, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - Halis Şimşek
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, 06230, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Tamara Matysiak-Budnik
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHRU de Nantes, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, 44000, Nantes, France
| | - Vladimir Milivojevic
- Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade School of Medicine, 11000, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Wojciech Marlicz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Marino Venerito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Otto-Von-Guericke University, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Lyudmila Boyanova
- Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Sofia, 1431, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Michael Doulberis
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University Department, Kantonsspital Aarau, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Lisette G Capelle
- Department of Gastroenterology, Meander Medical Center, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Cano-Català
- GOES Research Group, Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa, 08243, Manresa, Spain
| | - Leticia Moreira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), IDIBAPS (Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer), University of Barcelona, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francis Mégraud
- INSERM U1312, Université de Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Colm O'Morain
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, D02PN40, Ireland
| | - Javier P Gisbert
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Diego de León, 62, 28006, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laimas Jonaitis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 50161, Kaunas, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang Y, Wang X, Cao XY, Zhu HL, Miao L. Comparative effectiveness of different probiotics supplements for triple helicobacter pylori eradication: a network meta-analysis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2023; 13:1120789. [PMID: 37256113 PMCID: PMC10226649 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1120789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Probiotics has been reported as an effective supplement for Helicobacter pylori eradication. However, knowledge of their comparative efficacy is still lacking. Aim In this study, we used network meta-analysis of current probiotics supplement used in standard triple therapy to assess and rank their comparative effectiveness. Methods All randomized controlled trials from three main databases (PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library) up to April 2022 were collected and filtered to meet our criterion. We used Bayesian network meta-analysis to evaluate the eligible randomized controlled trials and gave a rank for the efficiency and incidence of side effects of each probiotics supplement. The ranking probability for each therapy was assessed by means of surfaces under cumulative ranking values. Subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate other possible influencing factors. Results 34 eligible randomized controlled trials entered the following meta-analysis, including 9,004 patients randomized to 10 kinds of therapies. Result showed that most probiotics added therapies had better outcomes than triple therapy, among which Bifidobacterium-Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium-Lactobacillus-Saccharomyces adjuvant therapy could obtain comprehensive benefit with high eradication rate (78.3% and 88.2% respectively), and cause few side effects. Combination of different probiotics, adding probiotics before or after triple therapy and longer duration of probiotics can improve therapeutic effect in H.pylori infected individuals. Conclusion For triple therapy of H.pylori infection, adding probiotics can increase eradication rate and bring protective effect. Considering the overall influence, Bifidobacterium-Lactobacillus or Bifidobacterium-Lactobacillus-Saccharomyces therapy can be a better choice in improving H.pylori eradication process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Wang
- Medical Centre for Digestive Diseases, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xue Wang
- Medical Centre for Digestive Diseases, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xue-Yan Cao
- Medical Centre for Digestive Diseases, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Han-Long Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Lin Miao
- Medical Centre for Digestive Diseases, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|