Living donor liver transplantation for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: A single center experience

The Impact of Metabolic Health and Obesity on Liver Transplant Candidates and Recipients

Poor metabolic health and obesity have significant impacts on the outcomes of patients suffering from chronic liver disease, particularly those with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Patients with such comorbidities who require liver transplant evaluation for advancing liver disease or liver failure require special consideration due to increased risk of cardiovascular disease, renal dysfunction, sarcopenic obesity, and cancer. Those who have had a history of prior bariatric surgery pose specific anatomical constraints and may also be at increased risk of alcohol use disorder. Pre-operative risk assessment as well as strict control of metabolic risk factors are essential to reduce intra-operative and post-liver transplant complications. As immunosuppressive therapy exacerbates metabolic dysfunction and risk for cancer, post-liver transplant care must focus on balancing the need to prevent rejection and the impact of progressive metabolic dysfunction in this unique, but growing, patient population.

The Outcomes of Liver Transplantation in Severe Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Patients

The increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus, obesity, and metabolic syndrome in the population can lead to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). In Western industrialized countries, this has become a major problem with significant socioeconomic impacts. MASH is now a leading cause of liver transplantation (LT), especially in developed countries. However, the post-transplant outcomes of such patients are a major concern, and published data are limited and extremely variable. In this article, we discuss graft and patient survival after LT, complications, the recurrence of MASH, and MASH appearing de novo after transplantation. Recent studies suggest that patients with MASH have slightly worse short-term survival, potentially due to increased cardiovascular mortality. However, most studies found that longer-term outcomes for patients undergoing LT for MASH are similar or even better than those for other indications. Hepatocellular carcinoma due to MASH cirrhosis also has similar or even better outcomes after LT than other etiologies. In conclusion, we suggest questions and topics that require further research to enhance healthcare for this growing patient population.

Impact of living donor liver transplantation on long-term cardiometabolic and graft outcomes in cirrhosis due to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a leading indication for liver transplantation (LT). This study aimed to determine whether living donor LT (LDLT) recipients experienced less recurrent NASH, cirrhosis, and cardiometabolic complications compared to deceased donor LT (DDLT).

METHOD

Patients with LDLT and DDLT for NASH between February 2002 and May 2018 at University Health Network (UHN) were compared. Cox Proportional Hazard model was used to analyze overall survival (OS), Fine and Gray's Competing Risk models were conducted to analyze cumulative incidence of post LT outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-nine DDLTs and 66 LDLTs were performed for NASH cirrhosis. Time and rate of recurrence of NAFLD and NASH were comparable in both groups. Graft cirrhosis was more common in DDLT recipients (n = 14) versus LDLT (n = 0) (p < .0001). Significant fibrosis (Fibrosis ≥ F2) developed in 50 recipients (12 LDLT and 38 DDLT) post LT (DDLT vs. LDLT: HR = 1.00, 95% CI = (.52-1.93), p = .91) and there was no difference in time to significant fibrosis (p = .57). There was no difference in development of post-transplant diabetes, dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and cancers. LDLT group had better renal function at 10 years (MDRD eGFR of 57.0 mL/min vs. 48.5 mL/min, p = .047). Both groups had a comparable OS (HR = 1.83 (95% CI = .92-3.62), p = .08).

CONCLUSION

Overall, LDLT recipients had significantly better renal function by virtue of having early transplantation in their disease course. LDLT was also associated with significantly less graft cirrhosis, although OS and cardiometabolic outcomes were comparable between LDLT and DDLT.

Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: A Rapidly Increasing Indication for Liver Transplantation in India

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Recently, there has been a considerable increase in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Availability of high-efficacy drugs for hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection may have changed the disease prevalence. We aimed to study the impact of this changing epidemiology in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) over a 10-year period.

METHODS

The study population was stratified into Period 1 (2009-2014) and Period 2 (2015-2019). Demographics, indications for LT and changes in the epidemiology between two periods were analysed. Aetiology-based posttransplant survival analysis was carried out.

RESULTS

Indication for LT among 1017 adult patients (277 in Period 1 and 740 in Period 2) showed a significant increase in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH; 85 [30.7%] and 311 [42%]; P = 0.001), decrease in hepatitis C (49 [17.7%] and 75 [10.1%]; P = 0.002), and increase in hepatocellular carcinoma from Period 1 to Period 2 (13 [26.5%] to 38 [50.7%]; P = 0.009) among HCV patients. Patients transplanted for NASH had a lower 5-year survival compared with viral hepatitis (75.9% vs 87.4%; P = 0.03). There was a strong association between coronary artery disease and NASH (hazard ratio = 1.963, 95% confidence interval, 1.19-3.22).

CONCLUSION

NASH is the leading indication for liver transplantation in India, surpassing viral hepatitis in recent years.

Hepatocellular carcinoma and other complications of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in Japan: A structured review of published works

AIMS

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in Japan. As the treatment of viral hepatitis improves, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are rapidly becoming leading causes of HCC in Japan. This structured review aims to characterize the morbidity and mortality of HCC and other malignant and non-malignant complications among Japanese NAFLD and NASH patients.

METHODS

An English and Japanese structured search of published works was undertaken in PubMed, Embase, and Ichushi Web databases, identifying 6553 studies, 34 of which met predefined inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Hepatocellular carcinoma was the most common incident malignancy among NAFLD/NASH patients, with higher incidence in patients with advanced/severe fibrosis (F3/F4) of 10.5%-20.0%. Although NASH results in a lower HCC cumulative incidence than hepatitis C virus (HCV) (11.3% vs. 30.5%), they have similar impacts on health outcomes, including overall mortality. Among Japanese NASH patients, HCC was found to be the main driver of mortality (40.0% in 2.7 years in NASH-HCC). With longer follow-up, higher mortality rates are observed in F3/4 patients: 25.0% in NASH F3/F4 versus 0.0% in NASH F0/2 over 7.7 years. The NASH-HCC patients also have a higher post-operative mortality than HCV-HCC patients. Additionally, NAFLD/NASH patients had higher rates of cardiovascular disease than non-NAFLD/NASH controls, and slightly higher rates of gastric cancer than HCV patients.

CONCLUSION

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common malignancy and cause of death among NAFLD/NASH patients in Japan, with higher mortality observed among those with advanced disease and complications. Early identification and effective treatments are needed.

Liver Transplantation for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: Pathophysiology of Recurrence and Clinical Challenges

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the fastest-growing indication for the liver transplant and a leading cause of hepatocellular carcinoma among patients listed for liver transplantation in the USA. Post-transplant nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis and steatohepatitis are frequent complications of liver transplantation. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis poses a significant challenge in both pre- and post-transplant period due to its association with metabolic syndrome, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, and obstructive sleep apnea. While optimal therapy is not yet available in the post-liver transplant setting, lifestyle interventions continue to remain as the mainstay of therapy for post-transplant nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Early recognition with protocol biopsies and noninvasive modalities, along with modification of known risk factors, are the most effective methods to curtail the progression of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in the absence of FDA-approved pharmacologic therapy.

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in posttransplantation liver: Review article

INTRODUCTION

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) associated or not with cirrhosis is the third leading indication for liver transplantation (LT) around the world. After transplants, NASH has a high prevalence and occurs as both recurrent and de novo manifestations. De novo NASH can also occur in allografts of patients transplanted for non-NASH liver disease.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate recurrent or de novo NASH in post-LT patients.

METHOD

A literature review was performed using search engines of indexed scientific material, including Medline (by PubMed), Scielo and Lilacs, to identify articles published in Portuguese and English until August 2016. Eligible studies included: place and year of publication, prevalence, clinical characteristics, risk factors and survival.

RESULTS

A total of 110 articles were identified and 63 were selected. Most of the studies evaluated recurrence and survival after LT. Survival reached 90-100% in 1 year and 52-100% in 5 years. Recurrence of NAFLD (steatosis) was described in 15-100% and NASH, in 4-71%. NAFLD and de novo NASH were observed in 18-67% and 3-17%, respectively. Metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and hypertension were seen in 45-58%, 18-59%, 25-66% and 52-82%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

After liver transplants, patients present a high prevalence of recurrent and de novo NASH. They also show a high frequence of metabolic disorders. Nevertheless, these alterations seem not to influence patient survival.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: de novo non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in liver-transplanted patients

BACKGROUND

De novo non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in liver-transplanted patients for cirrhosis not due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is becoming a growing phenomenon.

AIMS

We performed a systematic review and evaluated the prevalence of this event and possible associated factors.

METHODS

A literature search in medical databases (PubMed, MEDLINE/OVIDSP, Science Direct and EMBASE) was performed in March 2017. Relevant publications were identified in most important databases. We estimated the pooled prevalence of NAFLD and NASH in patients with liver transplant. The data have been expressed as proportions/percentages, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, using the inverse variance method. Odd ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were selected, enrolling 2166 subjects overall undergoing post-liver transplant biopsy. The pooled weighted prevalence of de novo NAFLD was 26% (95% CI 20%-31%). The pooled weighted prevalence of NASH was 2% (95% CI 0%-3%). The highest prevalences of de novo NAFLD were found for patients transplanted for alcoholic cirrhosis (37%) and cryptogenic cirrhosis (35%) and for patients taking tacrolimus (26%). Tacrolimus showed a risk of NAFLD similar to ciclosporin (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.3-3.51).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing liver transplant are more prone to experience diabetes, hypertension or dyslipidaemia, and NAFLD may be an important element in this context. In this study, we show how the prevalence of NASH tends to remain significant and similar to the general population. Moreover, this study suggests a possible association with specific transplant indications. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.

Early Intervention With Live Donor Liver Transplantation Reduces Resource Utilization in NASH: The Toronto Experience

Background

In parallel with the obesity epidemic, liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is increasing dramatically in North America. Although survival outcomes are similar to other etiologies, liver transplantation in the NASH population has been associated with significantly increased resource utilization. We sought to compare outcomes between live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) at a high volume North American transplant center, with a particular focus on resource utilization.

Methods

The study population consists of primary liver transplants performed for NASH at Toronto General Hospital from 2000 to 2014. Recipient characteristics, perioperative outcomes, graft and patient survivals, and resource utilization were compared for LDLT versus DDLT.

Results

A total of 176 patients were included in the study (48 LDLT vs 128 DDLT). LDLT recipients had a lower model for end-stage liver disease score and were less frequently hospitalized prior to transplant. Estimated blood loss and early markers of graft injury were lower for LDLT. LDLT recipients had a significantly shorter hospitalization (intensive care unit, postoperative, and total hospitalization).

Conclusions

LDLT for NASH facilitates transplantation of patients at a less severe stage of disease, which appears to promote a faster postoperative recovery with less resource utilization.

De Novo and Recurrence of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis After Liver Transplantation

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease in developing countries. Approximately 25% of patients with NAFLD develop nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). NASH-related cirrhosis is now a leading listing indication for liver transplantation in the United States. Although posttransplant survival for NASH-related cirrhosis is comparable with that of other liver diseases, many patients have features of metabolic syndrome, which can contribute to a recurrence of NAFLD or NASH. This article reviews the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of de novo and recurrence of NASH after liver transplantation.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver: optimizing pretransplant selection and posttransplant care to maximize survival

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is projected to become the most common indication for liver transplantation in the near future. NASH recipients have concurrent obesity, metabolic, and cardiovascular risks, which directly impact patient selection, posttransplant morbidity and potentially long-term outcomes. The purpose of this review is to highlight strategies to optimize pretransplant selection, outcomes, and posttransplant risk modification to optimize patient and graft survival.

RECENT FINDINGS

NASH recipients are at risk for pretransplant cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and related renovascular complications. Stringent selection criteria identify those patients most likely to benefit from liver transplantation without adverse cardiovascular events yet, the incidence of these events remains high in NASH recipients. High BMI imparts postoperative morbidity because of infections, wound complications, and longer lengths of hospital stay. Aggressive management of modifiable risk factors such as obesity, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension is recommended.

SUMMARY

Although patient and graft survival in NASH recipients is excellent, long-term reduction in healthcare utilization and outcomes in these patients would benefit from risk factor modification. Periodic reassessment of coronary artery disease and early consideration of bariatric surgery is recommended in this population.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and liver transplantation

Cirrhosis secondary to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a common indication for liver transplant. In comparison to other cirrhotic patients, patients with NASH cirrhosis are more likely to be older and have the metabolic syndrome. Pre-transplant, patients require careful evaluation of cardiovascular risk. As the incidence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is rising, a greater proportion of donor grafts have steatosis greater than 30%, which is associated with poor outcomes. Grafts with steatosis greater than 60% are unsuitable for transplant. Overall, post-transplant survival outcomes for patients with NASH cirrhosis are similar to those with cirrhosis without NASH. However, NASH cirrhosis is associated with a higher 30-day mortality, predominantly from an increase in cardiovascular events and infections. Following liver transplant, there is a significant risk of NASH recurrence, although this seldom results in allograft loss. Furthermore, a significant number of patients who had a liver transplant for other reasons develop NASH de novo. When patients with NASH cirrhosis are considered for transplant, one of the major challenges lies in identifying which patients are too high risk for surgery. This review aims to provide information to aid this decision making process, and to provide guidance on the peri-operative care strategies that can modify risk.

“Weighing the risk”: Obesity and outcomes following liver transplantation

Obesity is on the rise worldwide. As a result, unprecedented rates of patients are presenting with end stage liver disease in the setting of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and are requiring liver transplantation. There are significant concerns that the risk factors associated with obesity and the metabolic syndrome might have a detrimental effect on the long term outcomes following liver transplantation. In general, short term patient and graft outcomes for both obese and morbidly obese patients are comparable with that of non-obese patients, however, several studies report an increase in peri-operative morbidity and increased length of stay. Continued studies documenting the long-term outcomes from liver transplantation are needed to further examine the risk of recurrent disease (NAFLD) and also further define the role risk factors such cardiovascular disease might play long term. Effective weight reduction in the post liver transplant setting may mitigate the risks associated with the metabolic syndrome long-term.

Pre-and-post transplant considerations in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is currently the third most common indication for liver transplantation in the United States. With the growing incidence of obesity, NAFLD is expected to become the most common indication for liver transplantation over the next few decades. As the number of patients who have undergone transplantation for NAFLD increases, unique challenges have emerged in the management and long-term outcomes in patients. Risk factors such as obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia continue to play an important role in the pathogenesis of the disease and its recurrence. Patients who undergo liver transplantation for NAFLD have similar long-term survival as patients who undergo liver transplantation for other indications. Research shows that post-transplantation recurrence of NAFLD is commonplace with some patients progressing to recurrent non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and cirrhosis. While treatment of comorbidities is important, there is no consensus on the management of modifiable risk factors or the role of pharmacotherapy and immunosuppression in patients who develop recurrent or de novo NAFLD post-transplant. This review provides an outline of NAFLD as indication for liver transplantation with a focus on the epidemiology, pathophysiology and risk factors associated with this disease. It also provides a brief review on the pre-transplant considerations and post-transplant factors including patient characteristics, role of obesity and metabolic syndrome, recurrence and de novo NAFLD, outcomes post-liver transplantation, choice of medications, and options for immunosuppression.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and liver transplantation: Outcomes and advances

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most prevalent causes of chronic liver disease worldwide. In the last decade it has become the third most common indication for liver transplantation in the United States. Increasing prevalence of NAFLD in the general population also poses a risk to organ donation, as allograft steatosis can be associated with non-function of the graft. Post-transplant survival is comparable between NAFLD and non-NAFLD causes of liver disease, although long term outcomes beyond 10 year are lacking. NAFLD can recur in the allograft frequently although thus far post transplant survival has not been impacted. De novo NAFLD can also occur in the allograft of patients transplanted for non-NAFLD liver disease. Predictors for NAFLD post-transplant recurrence include obesity, hyperlipidemia and diabetes as well as steroid dose after liver transplantation. A polymorphism in PNPLA3 that mediates triglyceride hydrolysis and is linked to pre-transplant risk of obesity and NAFLD has also been linked to post transplant NAFLD risk. Although immunosuppression side effects potentiate obesity and the metabolic syndrome, studies of immunosuppression modulation and trials of specific immunosuppression regimens post-transplant are lacking in this patient population. Based on pre-transplant data, sustained weight loss through diet and exercise is the most effective therapy for NAFLD. Other agents occasionally utilized in NAFLD prior to transplantation include vitamin E and insulin-sensitizing agents. Studies of these therapies are lacking in the post-transplant population. A multimodality and multidisciplinary approach to treatment should be utilized in management of post-transplant NAFLD.