Systematic review comparing the safety and efficacy of conventional and drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma

5-Fluorouracil combined with CalliSphere drug-eluting beads or conventional transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score weighting analysis

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of 5-Fluorouracil (5-Fu) combined with conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) compared to 5-Fu combined with drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) using CalliSpheres for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using propensity score weighting methods. This retrospective analysis included 131 patients with HCC treated with 5-Fu combined with cTACE (5-Fu-cTACE group, n = 65) or DEB-TACE (5-Fu-DEB-TACE group, n = 66) at the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from January 2019 to December 2022. Based on the baseline data and laboratory indicators, propensity score weighting was used to reduce confounding bias. Modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) were used to evaluate clinical efficacy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were the disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs). PFS was assessed using Kaplan‒Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. The ORRs at 1 month (M1) after treatment in the 5-Fu-DEB-TACE group and 5-Fu-cTACE group were 90.9% and 76.9%, respectively (P = 0.029), while at this time, the DCRs were 93.9% in the 5-Fu-DEB-TACE group and 90.8% in the 5-Fu-cTACE group (P = 0.494). At 3 months (M3) after treatment, the 5-Fu-DEB-TACE group had a higher ORR (84.8% vs. 56.9%, P < 0.001) and DCR (84.8% vs. 72.3%, P = 0.08). The ORR at 6 months (M6) was also higher in the 5-Fu-DEB-TACE group than in the 5-Fu-cTACE group (72.7% vs. 50.8%, P = 0.01). The median PFS after treatment with 5-Fu-DEB-TACE was longer than that after treatment with 5-Fu-cTACE (11 months vs. 6 months) (P = 0.004). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis indicated that 5-Fu-DEB-TACE (HR = 0.590, P = 0.044), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) intermediate risk (HR = 2.470, P = 0.010), BCLC stage B (HR = 2.303, P = 0.036), BCLC stage C (HR = 3.354, P = 0.002) and ascitic fluid (HR = 2.004, P = 0.046) were independent predictors of PFS. No treatment-related deaths occurred in this study. The 5-Fu-DEB-TACE group had a greater incidence of abdominal pain (72.7% vs. 47.7%, P = 0.003). However, the incidence of postoperative elevated transaminase levels was higher in the 5-Fu-cTACE group (83.1% vs. 66.6%, P = 0.031). Subgroups analysis showed patients receiving 5-Fu-DEB-TACE have better PFS compared to those receiving 5-Fu-cTACE in the BCLC stage A group (P = 0.0093), BCLC stage B group (P = 0.0096), multifocal group (P = 0.0056), Child-Pugh stage A group (P<0.001), non- extrahepatic metastasis group (P = 0.022), non-vascular invasion group (P = 0.0093), and the group with a largest tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm (P = 0.0048). At M1, M3, and M6, patients with preserved liver function and in some cases of low tumor burden had higher Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) (P < 0.05). Compared with 5-Fu-cTACE, 5-Fu-DEB-TACE has superior therapeutic efficacy, prolongs PFS, and reduces hepatotoxicity. However, it is associated with an increased incidence of postoperative abdominal pain.

Combination of Doxorubicin and Antiangiogenic Agents in Drug-Eluting Beads: In Vitro Loading and Release Dynamics in View of a Novel Therapeutic Approach for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Antiangiogenic agents have been used for many years as a first-line systemic treatment for advanced HCC. Embolization with cytostatic drugs on the other hand is the first-line treatment for intermediate HCC. The two types of drugs have not been combined for intraarterial delivery yet. The loading and release dynamics and the in vitro effect of their combination are tested in this experimental study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Drug-eluting beads were loaded with doxorubicin, sunitinib and sunitinib analogue piperazine (SAP) alone and with their combinations. Diameter change, loading, release, and effect in cellular proliferation were assessed.

RESULTS

The average microsphere diameter after loading was 473.7 µm (μm) for Doxorubicin, 388.4 μm for Sunitinib, 515.5 μm for SAP, 414.8 μm for the combination Doxorubicin/Sunitinib and 468.8 μm for the combination Doxorubicin /SAP. Drug release in 0.9% NaCl was 10% for Doxorubicin, 49% for Sunitinib, 25% for SAP, 20%/18% for the combination Doxorubicin/Sunitinib, and 18%/23% for the combination Doxorubicin/SAP whereas in human plasma it was 56%, 27%, 13%, 76%/63% and 62%/15%, respectively. The mean concentration of Doxorubicin that led to inhibition of 50% of cellular proliferation in an HCC Huh7 cell line was 163.1 nM (nM), for Sunitinib 10.3 micromolar (μΜ), for SAP 16.7 μΜ, for Doxorubicin/Sunitinib 222.4 nM and for Doxorubicin/SAP 275 nM.

CONCLUSIONS

Doxorubicin may be combined with antiangiogenic drugs with satisfactory in vitro loading and release outcomes and effect on cellular lines.

Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) remains an unresolved challenge. There is ongoing debate regarding the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies. The main endpoints under investigation were survival outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time to progression (TTP). Secondary outcomes encompassed tumor response rates and adverse events (AEs). Two researchers conducted the data extraction independently and assessed the quality of the studies. After pooling and analyzing the data, we assessed the heterogeneity and performed both subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis. Additionally, we evaluated the potential for publication bias.

RESULTS

Eight studies with 1513 patients were finally retrieved. Compared to monotherapy, although bigeminal therapy exhibited improved survival benefits (OS: HR: 0.56, 95 % CI 0.41-0.76, p < 0.001; TTP: HR: 0.72, 95 % CI 0.59-0.87, p = 0.001) and tumor response (ORR: RR: 1.59; 95 % CI 1.19-2.13, p = 0.002; DCR: RR: 1.14; 95 % CI 1.03-1.26, p = 0.010), the reliability of results was affected by significant heterogeneity. In the subgroup analysis, compared to DEB-TACE alone, the bigeminal therapy failed to show any statistical differences. Compared to TKIs, it demonstrated significant advantages in both survival (OS: HR: 0.49, 95 % CI 0.40-0.61, p < 0.001; TTP: HR: 0.60, 95 % CI 0.48-0.75, p < 0.001) and tumor response (ORR: RR: 2.40, 95 % CI 1.86-3.09, p < 0.001; DCR: RR: 1.36, 95 % CI 1.20-1.54, p < 0.001) while low heterogeneity was observed. Concerning safety, DEB-TACE provides no more severe AEs while TKIs-related AEs require close monitoring.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that DEB-TACE combined with TKIs may be a safe and effective treatment for uHCC, which is more suitable for patients in the advanced stage.

Comparison of the Treatment Response of Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization and Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Introduction Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common primary hepatic cancer. Its early diagnosis can aid in its treatment by curative means such as surgery or ablation. Advanced-stage diagnosis limits these treatment options, and such cases can be treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) and drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) are usually used, and follow-up response is evaluated using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria. This study was done to compare the treatment response of cTACE and DEB-TACE in patients with HCC. Materials and methods A retrospective review of electronic medical records of all patients diagnosed with HCC from January 2021 to August 2022 who underwent cTACE or DEB-TACE was undertaken at the Department of Interventional Radiology, Indus Hospital and Health Network. Both male and female patients aged 18 years or above with Child-Pugh class A and B were included. DEB-TACE or cTACE was performed by a fellowship-trained interventional radiologist, and the response was evaluated at six weeks follow-up using mRECIST criteria. Results A total of 129 patients were included in this study, with a mean age of 54.1 ± 10.8 years. The mean size of HCC was 3.1 ± 1.7 cm. Seventy-eight (60.5%) patients underwent cTACE, and 51 (39.5%) underwent DEB-TACE. Out of the 78 patients who underwent cTACE, complete response (CR) was found in 28 (35.9%), partial response (PR) was found in 33 (42.3%), stable disease (SD) was found in 12 (15.4%), and progressive disease (PD) was found in five (6.4%) patients. Of the 51 patients who underwent DEB-TACE, CR was found in 13 (25.5%), PR was found in 20 (39.2%), SD was found in 11 (21.6%), and PD was found in seven (13.7%) patients. Conclusion The response rate of TACE in the form of complete or partial response was higher with a lower frequency of stable or progressive disease. cTACE has a high response rate as compared to DEB-TACE.

Use of doxorubicin-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion: a prospective study

Background/Aim

To evaluate the applicability of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatment with doxorubicin drug-eluting beads (DEBs) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein invasion (PVI).

Methods

This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board and informed consent was obtained from all participants. A total of 30 HCC patients with PVI received DEB-TACE between 2015 and 2018. The following parameters were evaluated: complications during DEB-TACE, abdominal pain, fever, and laboratory outcomes, including liver function change. Overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), and adverse events were also analyzed and assessed.

Results

DEBs measuring 100-300 μm in diameter were loaded with doxorubicin (150 mg per procedure). There were no complications during DEB-TACE and no significant differences in the levels of prothrombin time, serum albumin, or total bilirubin at follow-up compared to baseline. The median TTP was 102 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 42-207 days) and the median OS was 216 days (95% CI, 160-336 days). Three patients (10%) had severe adverse reactions, including transient acute cholangitis (n=1), cerebellar infarction (n=1), and pulmonary embolism (n=1), but no treatment-related death occurred.

Conclusions

DEB-TACE may be a therapeutic option for advanced HCC patients with PVI.

Evaluation of Transarterial Chemoembolization Protocol with Drug-Eluting Beads in Combination with Lipiodol for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Controlled Study

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) and lipiodol (DEB-Lipiodol TACE) in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

Materials and Methods

The medical records of consecutive unresectable HCC patients who underwent DEB-TACE or DEB-Lipiodol TACE from June 2016 to July 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. Therapeutic response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) were compared among the groups.

Results

Three hundred and twenty-seven patients were enrolled in the study, including 293 patients in the DEB-TACE group and 34 patients in the DEB-Lipiodol TACE group. The objective response rate in the DEB-Lipiodol TACE group was 17.6%, significantly higher than that in the DEB-TACE group (5.8%, P=0.011). Similarly, DEB-Lipiodol TACE group also had a higher disease control rate (91.2% vs 68.6%, P=0.006). Median OS was 13 months (95% CI: 11.0 months and 15.0 months) and 22 months (95% CI: 17.3 months and 26.7 months) in the DEB-TACE group and DEB-Lipiodol TACE group, respectively (P=0.041). Meanwhile, median PFS was 7 months (95% CI: 5.2 months and 8.8 months) in the DEB-TACE group and 12 months (95% CI: 7.9 months and 16.1 months) in the DEB-Lipiodol TACE group (P=0.174). There was no statistically significant difference in AEs incidence among the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

DEB-Lipiodol TACE was safe, well tolerated, and had a better efficacy compared with DEB-TACE in unresectable HCC patients.

Conventional vs. Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma-A Propensity Score Weighted Comparison of Efficacy and Safety

This study compared the efficacy and safety of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) with drug-eluting beads (DEB)-TACE in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This retrospective analysis included 370 patients with HCC treated with cTACE (n = 248) or DEB-TACE (n = 122) (January 2000-July 2014). Overall survival (OS) was assessed using uni- and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Additionally, baseline imaging was assessed, and clinical and laboratory toxicities were recorded. Propensity score weighting via a generalized boosted model was applied to account for group heterogeneity. There was no significant difference in OS between cTACE (20 months) and DEB-TACE patients (24.3 months, ratio 1.271, 95% confidence interval 0.876-1.69; p = 0.392). However, in patients with infiltrative disease, cTACE achieved longer OS (25.1 months) compared to DEB-TACE (9.2 months, ratio 0.366, 0.191-0.702; p = 0.003), whereas DEB-TACE proved more effective in nodular disease (39.4 months) than cTACE (18 months, ratio 0.458, 0.308-0681; p = 0.007). Adverse events occurred with similar frequency, except for abdominal pain, which was observed more frequently after DEB-TACE (101/116; 87.1%) than cTACE (119/157; 75.8%; p = 0.02). In conclusion, these findings suggest that tumor morphology and distribution should be used as parameters to inform decisions on the selection of embolic materials for TACE for a more personalized treatment planning in patients with unresectable HCC.

Bronchial Artery Chemoembolization With Radiopaque Doxorubicin Eluding Beads in Patients With Malignant Hemoptysis from Metastatic Lung Cancer

Purpose:This pilot study was designed to assess the technical feasibility and safety of bronchial artery chemoembolization with radiopaque doxorubicin eluting beads (DEB-BACE) in patients with malignant hemoptysis from pulmonary metastasis. Materials & Methods: Four patients underwent DEB-BACE using 70-150 μm radiopaque DEB (LC Beads LUMI, Boston Scientific). Beads delivery and deposition were assessed under fluoroscopy and cone beam computed tomography (CT), respectively. Results: All 4 procedures were technically successful. Beads delivery and deposition were successfully visualized under fluoroscopy and cone beam CT guidance in all cases. Hemoptysis was resolved after embolization in all 4 patients. There were no adverse events or immediate or early complications after DEB-BACE. Two patients (50%) required repeat DEB-BACE within 1 week due to recurrent hemoptysis, and 1 patient had DEB-BACE 1.5 years later due to recurrent hemoptysis from the contralateral lung. All targeted lesions decreased in size in follow-up studies (mean 16 months, range 1-33 months). One patient died of progressive cancer disease invading the heart 1 month after DEB-BACE. Conclusions: DEB-BACE using radiopaque LC Beads LUMI loaded with doxorubicin is technically feasible and safe for controlling hemoptysis and cancer progression in patients with metastatic lung tumors. Visualization of beads delivery under fluoroscopy and deposition of beads under cone beam CT facilitate delivery of beads and embolization of bronchial arteries.

Experimental study of camptothecin combined with drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization in the rabbit VX2 liver tumor model

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) has been widely used in the treatment of liver cancer; however, the utilization rate of chemotherapeutic drugs after embolization is low. Chemotherapy resistance mediated by high nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (NRF2) expression limits DEB-TACE efficacy. Camptothecin (CPT), an NRF2 inhibitor, exerts chemosensitizing effects. We designed a controlled experiment to determine the efficacy and feasibility of DEB-TACE combined with CPT for the treatment of rabbit VX2 hepatoma. DEB-TACE activated NRF2 expression in the tumor region. NRF2 activation could be inhibited by the combined use of CPT. After DEB-TACE alone, the tumor necrosis was incomplete, there were still highly active tumor residues, and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, which was negatively correlated with tumor activity observed by magnetic resonance imaging, remained low. After DEB-TACE combined with CPT, the relative necrosis of the tumor was more complete, the ADC value was higher, and the ADC change was greater. The single application of CPT did not result in evident liver function and physical burden to the rabbits. The combined use of CPT and DEB-TACE did not significantly increase DEB-TACE imaging of liver function and body. In conclusion, CPT can also inhibit high NRF2 expression after DEB-TACE treatment. Combining CPT with DEB-TACE can improve the sensitivity of DEB-TACE in the treatment of VX2 tumors, improve the therapeutic effect, and has no evident toxic and side effects. This study explored the methods for enhancing the efficacy of DEB-TACE in liver cancer from a new perspective and performed model experiments, which provided a theoretical basis for future clinical treatment.

Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Taiwan (SERENADE-T)

Purpose

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with drug-eluting bead with doxorubicin transarterial chemoembolization (DEBDOX-TACE) in Taiwan.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively investigated 630 hepatocellular carcinoma patients who underwent DEBDOX-TACE in multiple institutions from 2011 to 2016 in Taiwan. Tumor response was assessed per modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, overall survival, and safety.

Results

This study included 630 patients who underwent DEBDOX-TACE, participants’ mean age was 66 years, 68.1% males and 15.6% females. The mean doxorubicin dose administered via DEBDOX-TACE was 56 mg. Complete and partial response rates were 14.6% and 49.2%, respectively, with a disease control rate of 84.6%. The median overall survival was 29.2 months. The most common post-embolization symptom was abdominal pain (22.4%). No hepatic encephalopathy and no procedure-related death were found.

Conclusion

Real-world data from Taiwan demonstrated that DEBDOX-TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma can achieve high tumor response rate with low adverse events.

Recent Trends and In-Hospital Mortality of Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) in Germany: A Systematic Analysis of Hospital Discharge Data between 2010 and 2019

(1) Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a minimally invasive procedure, characterized by the selective occlusion of tumor-feeding hepatic arteries, via injection of an embolizing agent and an anticancer drug. It represents a standard of care for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and it is also increasingly performed in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), as well as in liver metastases. Apart from the original method, based on intra-arterial infusion of a liquid drug followed by embolization, newer particle-based TACE procedures have been introduced recently. As yet, comprehensive data on current trends of TACE, as well as its in-hospital mortality in Germany, which could help to further improve outcome following TACE, are missing. (2) Methods: Based on standardized hospital discharge data, provided by the German Federal Statistical Office from 2010 to 2019, we aimed at systematically evaluating current clinical developments and in-hospital mortality related to TACE in Germany. (3) Results: A total of 49,595 individual cases undergoing TACE were identified within the observation period. The overall in-hospital mortality was 1.00% and significantly higher in females compared to males (1.12 vs. 0.93%; p < 0.001). We identified several post-interventional complications, such as liver failure (51.49%), sepsis (33.87%), renal failure (23.9%), and liver abscess (15.87%), which were associated with a significantly increased in-hospital mortality. Moreover, in-hospital mortality significantly differed between the underlying indications for TACE (HCC: 0.83%, liver metastases: 1.22%, and CCA: 1.40%), as well as between different embolization agents (liquid embolization: 0.80%, loaded microspheres: 0.92%, spherical particles: 1.54%, and non-spherical particles: 2.84%), for which we observed large geographic differences in their frequency of use. Finally, in-hospital mortality was significantly increased in centers with a low annual TACE case volume (<15 TACE/year: 2.08% vs. >275 TACE/year: 0.45%). (4) Conclusion: Our data provide a systematic overview of indications and embolization methods for TACE in Germany. We identified a variety of factors, such as post-interventional complications, the embolization method used, and the hospitals’ annual case volume, which are associated with an increased in-hospital mortality following TACE. These data might help to further reduce the mortality of this routinely performed local-ablative procedure in the future.

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Safety between 70–150 µm and 100–300 µm Doxorubicin Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 70–150 μm doxorubicin drug-eluting bead (DEB) transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with those of 100–300 μm DEB-TACE as first-line treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: We retrospectively investigated 72 patients who underwent TACE with 70–150 μm DEBs (n = 40) or 100–300 μm DEBs (n = 32) for HCC in a tertiary center between March 2013 and May 2019. Initial treatment response and adverse events were assessed using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0, respectively. Results: At the 2-month post-treatment assessment, the complete and objective response rates were 47.5% and 85.0%, respectively, for the 70–150 μm group and 34.4% and 81.3%, respectively, for the 100–300 μm group; however, the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In total, 65% patients in the 70–150 μm group and 59.4 % patients in the 100-300 μm group experienced at least one symptom of post-embolization syndrome after TACE; all symptoms were classified as grade 1 or 2. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of post-procedural laboratory changes such as changes in liver enzymes and bilirubin levels (p > 0.05). Laboratory toxicity of grade 3 occurred in three patients, all of which were transient elevation of liver enzyme levels. Hepatobiliary adverse events, such as bile duct injury, biloma, liver abscess, and hepatic infarction, were not observed in either treatment group. Conclusion: This study found no significant difference in tumor response between 70–150 μm and 100–300 μm DEB-TACE. Both groups showed favorable safety profiles, and the difference was not significant.

Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Camrelizumab Compared With Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Camrelizumab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization plus camrelizumab (D-TACE-C) with conventional transarterial chemoembolization plus camrelizumab (C-TACE-C) in the treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective study that evaluated the consecutive medical records of patients with unresectable HCC who had undergone D-TACE-C or C-TACE-C from April 2020 to August 2021. Efficacy of treatment was evaluated using tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS) and survival rates. The adverse events were recorded.

Results

A total of 54 patients were included in this study, including 27 patients who had received D-TACE-C treatment, and 27 patients who had received C-TACE-C treatment. The median PFS and DCR in the D-TACE-C group were significantly longer than those for the C-TACE-C group (PFS: 10 vs. 3 months, P=.017; DCR: 70.4% vs. 40.7%, P = .028). Cox regression analysis showed that D-TACE-C was the only protective factor for PFS. The 6-month and 12-month survival rates in D-TACE-C group and C-TACE-C group were 85.2% versus 79.4% (P = .646) and 65.2% versus 65.1% (P = .903), respectively. Reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation was the most common adverse event associated with the treatment. There was no significant difference in the adverse events related to TACE and camrelizumab between the two groups. No treatment-related deaths occurred in this study.

Conclusions

D-TACE-C is a safe and well-tolerated treatment, and may produce better PFS and tumor response in patients with unresectable HCC than C-TACE-C.

Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Versus Drug-Eluting Beads in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of liver cancer and accounts for approximately 6% of all human cancers. In this study, we performed a systematic review and pooled analysis of the conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (C-TACE) compared to drug-eluting beads TACE (DEB-TACE) as two treatment options for patients with unresectable HCC. Treatment with DEB-TACE appears to be non-inferior compared to conventional C-TACE and associated with a better objective response and disease control with fewer severe complications and all-cause mortality. In light of these findings, research efforts should attempt to further characterize the efficacy and safety profile of DEB-TACE as a potential component of unresectable HCC management.

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurs in nearly three-quarters of all primary liver cancers, with the majority not amenable to curative therapies. We therefore aimed to re-evaluate the safety, efficacy, and survival benefits of treating patients with drug-eluting beads transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) compared to the conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (C-TACE). Several databases were searched with a strict eligibility criterion for studies reporting on adult patients with unresectable or recurrent HCC. The pooled analysis included 34 studies involving 4841 HCC patients with a median follow-up of 1.5 to 18 months. There were no significant differences between DEB-TACE and C-TACE with regard to complete response, partial response and disease stability. However, disease control (OR: 1.42 (95% CI (1.03,1.96) and objective response (OR: 1.33 (95% CI (0.99, 1.79) were significantly more effective for DEB-TACE treatment with fewer severe complications and all-cause mortality. The pooled-analysis did not find superiority of DEB-TACE in complete or partial response, disease stability, controlling disease progression, and 30 day or end-mortality. However, results showed that DEB-TACE is associated with a better objective response, disease control, and lower all-cause mortality with severe complications compared to C-TACE treatment. Given that the safety outcomes are based on limited studies with a potential for bias, there was no clear improvement of DEB-TACE over C-TACE treatment.

Conventional versus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization: A better option for treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a minimally invasive procedure involving intra-arterial catheter-based chemotherapy to selectively administer high doses of cytotoxic drugs to the tumor bed along with ischemic necrosis induced by arterial embolization. Chemoembolization forms the essential core of management in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are not suitable for curative therapies such as transplantation, resection, or percutaneous ablation. TACE of hepatic cancer(s) has proven to be helpful in achieving local tumor control, and has supported the ability to prevent tumor progression, prolong patient life, and manage patient symptoms. Recent data have demonstrated that, in patients with single-nodule HCC ≤3 ​cm without vascular invasion, the 5-year overall survival with TACE was found to be comparable with hepatic resection and radiofrequency ablation. Used for several years, Lipiodol continues to play a vital role as a tumor-seeking and radiopaque drug delivery vector in interventional oncology. Efforts have been made to enhance the administration of chemotherapeutic agents to tumors. Compared with conventional TACE, drug-eluting bead TACE is a fairly new drug delivery embolization technique that permits fixed dosing and has the ability to provide sustained release of anticancer agents over a period of time. The present review discusses the basic procedure of TACE and its properties, and the effectiveness of conventional and drug-eluting bead chemoembolization systems currently available or presently undergoing clinical evaluation.

Amphiregulin as a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker of hepatocellular carcinoma before and after locoregional treatment

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a highly prevalent tumor worldwide. Amphiregulin is a ligand of the epidermal growth factor receptor. Its elevation is linked to different inflammatory and neoplastic conditions. Therefore, amphiregulin may represent a potential diagnostic target in HCC, which has sparked interest as a potential predictor of diagnosis and progression of HCC. The current work was set out to evaluate amphiregulin as a possible diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for HCC on top of cirrhosis. Thirty adult patients with liver cirrhosis and HCC (HCC group) were randomly selected as candidates for locoregional therapies, either radiofrequency ablation or transarterial chemoembolization. A separate group of thirty liver cirrhosis patients served as controls (cirrhosis group). All patients underwent standard laboratory tests and abdominal ultrasounds. Alpha-fetoprotein and amphiregulin were measured twice at baseline and 1 month after the intervention.

Results

Baseline serum amphiregulin was significantly higher in the HCC group than in the cirrhosis group (23.2 ± 11.5 vs. 11.1 ± 7.1), with a p value < 0.001. Patients with multiple and larger focal lesions had greater levels of amphiregulin, with p values of 0.015 and 0.002, respectively. At 1 month following locoregional treatment, the amphiregulin level considerably declined compared with its baseline levels (from 23.2 ± 11.5 to 19.4 ± 10.9), with a p value of 0.012, while AFP showed an insignificant reduction. At follow-up, the level of serum amphiregulin was statistically significantly greater in recurrence cases than in remission cases (30.8 ± 14.1 vs. 17.2 ± 8.8), with a p value of 0.008, and the same was observed for AFP level.

At a cutoff ≥ 17 pg/mL, amphiregulin was a valuable marker in HCC detection with a sensitivity and specificity of 63.3% and 86.7%, respectively, while it has 60% sensitivity and 96% specificity in detecting possible tumor recurrence at a cutoff ≥ 29.7 pg/ml.

Conclusions

Amphiregulin may be a good diagnostic marker for HCC and a prognostic marker after locoregional therapies because its follow-up levels are useful in predicting possible tumor recurrence.

Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib Compared with Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Apatinib in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Objective

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads TACE plus apatinib (D-TACE-A) with those of conventional TACE plus apatinib (C-TACE-A) for the treatment of unresectable HCC.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 187 consecutive patients who received TACE plus apatinib in our institution from January 1, 2017, to July 1, 2019. Among them, 91 patients received C-TACE-A, and 96 patients received D-TACE-A. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate (DCR). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce selection bias.

Results

Before PSM, the median OS was 15 months (95% CI: 12.5–17.5) and 13 months (95% CI: 11.1–14.9; P=0.480) in the C-TACE-A and D-TACE-A groups, respectively. The median PFS was 7 months (95% CI: 5.9–8.1) in the C-TACE-A group and 7 months (95% CI: 5.6–8.4; p=0.677) in the D-TACE-A group. The DCR was 81.3% in the C-TACE-A group and 72.9% in the D-TACE-A group. Cox regression analysis showed that D-TACE-A did not increase mortality risk or tumor recurrence risk. After PSM, there was no statistically significant difference in median OS or PFS between the two groups. In the subgroup analysis, after adjusting for relative factors, D-TACE-A increased the mortality risk more than C-TACE-A in patients with BCLC stage C (HR: 1.678, 95% CI: 1.129–2.495; P=0.011), but D-TACE-A lowered the tumor recurrence risk compared with C-TACE-A in patients with Child–Pugh B (HR: 0.210, 95% CI: 0.082–0.538; P=0.001) and cirrhosis (HR: 0.481, 95% CI: 0.293–0.791; P=0.004). Grade III and IV adverse events in patients with D-TACE-A were similar to those in patients treated with C-TACE-A (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Patients with unresectable HCC treated with D-TACE-A might not show increased survival compared with patients treated with C-TACE-A. Advanced HCC patients without cirrhosis may receive greater survival benefits from C-TACE-A than D-TACE-A.

Drug-eluting beads TACE is safe and non-inferior to conventional TACE in HCC patients with TIPS

Objectives

This study aims to compare the safety and effectiveness between transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) and conventional TACE (cTACE) using lipiodol-based regimens in HCC patients with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).

Methods

This retrospective study included patients with patent TIPS who underwent TACE from January 2013 to January 2019 that received either DEB-TACE (DEB-TACE group, n = 57) or cTACE (cTACE group, n = 62). The complications, liver toxicity, overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), and objective response rate (ORR) were compared between the groups.

Results

Altogether, 119 patients (50 ± 11 years, 107 men) were evaluated. The incidence of adverse events, including abdominal pain within 7 days (45.6% vs 79.0%, p < 0.001) and hepatic failure within 30 days (5.3% vs 19.4%, p = 0.027), were significantly lower in the DEB-TACE group than in the cTACE group. Compared to the cTACE group, the DEB-TACE group also showed mild liver toxicities in terms of increased total bilirubin (8.8% vs 22.6%), alanine aminotransferase (5.3% vs 21.0%), and aspartate aminotransferase (10.5% vs 29.0%) levels. The DEB-TACE group had better ORR than the cTACE group (70.2% vs 50.0%). The median OS and TTP were longer in the DEB-TACE group (11.4 vs 9.1 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 2.46, p < 0.001; 6.9 vs 5.2 months, HR = 1.47, p = 0.045). Multivariable analysis showed that α-fetoprotein levels, Barcelona clinic liver cancer stage, and treatment allocation were independent predictors of OS.

Conclusion

DEB-TACE is safe and effective in HCC patients with a TIPS and is potentially superior to cTACE in terms of complications, liver toxicities, OS, TTP, and ORR.

Key Points

• DEB-TACE is safe and effective in HCC patients after a TIPS procedure.

• DEB-TACE improves overall survival, objective response rate, and liver toxicities and is non-inferior to cTACE in terms of time to progression.

• DEB-TACE might be a potential new therapeutic option for HCC patients with TIPS.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-07834-9.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of serum soluble CD163 in cirrhotic patients with hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma before and after locoregional therapy

Background

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), inflammatory cells in tumor microenvironment, are crucial for the tumor occurrence and progression which in turn increase the expression of soluble CD163 (sCD163). Nevertheless, not much has been established regarding sCD163 and its connection to HCC diagnosis and prognosis. This study was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic role of sCD163 in patients with HCC on top of HCV-related liver cirrhosis. Forty adult patients with HCV-related liver cirrhosis and HCC (HCC group) were randomly selected and subjected to locoregional therapies, either transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Four patients were excluded because of portal vein invasion. Another group of 20 patients with liver cirrhosis only served as controls (LC group). Routine laboratory studies and abdominal ultrasound were done for all. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and sCD163 were measured twice, at baseline and 1-month post-intervention, using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit.

Results

At baseline, sCD163 showed an insignificant higher value in HCC group (p > 0.05). The best cutoff value for sCD163 and AFP was 6.2 mg/L and 195 ng/mL, respectively. AFP had a larger area under the curve (0.88 vs. 0.767). An overall significant decline was seen in sCD163 after treatment (6.5±1.5 to 3.1±2.5 mg/L; p < 0.001), while AFP showed an insignificant decrease (p > 0.05). Also, sCD163 decreased significantly in the eradicated cases (6.1±1.4 mg/L before intervention vs. 2.3±1.4 mg/L after intervention, p < 0.01), while there was a significant increase in the recurrent cases (8.4±0.4 mg/L before intervention vs. 10.3±1.6 after intervention; p < 0.05). Moreover, sCD163 showed a significant difference in its pre-intervention and post-intervention values between recurrent and eradicated HCC cases (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

It is concluded that sCD163 has a minor role as a diagnostic marker for HCC, yet it could be used as a good prognostic marker in predicting the tumor response to locoregional therapies.

Comprehensive predictive factors for CalliSpheres® microspheres (CSM) drug-eluting bead-transarterial chemoembolization and conventional transarterial chemoembolization on treatment response and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is widely applied in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who are not suitable for surgical treatment. We aimed to investigate the treatment outcomes and comprehensive prognostic factors of CalliSpheres® microspheres (CSM) drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) treatment and conventional TACE (cTACE) treatment in HCC patients.

METHODS

Three hundred and thirty-five HCC patients received DEB-TACE or cTACE treatment were consecutively enrolled in multi-center, retrospective cohort study. Treatment response was conducted at M1, M3 or M6 after treatment. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were recorded. Thirty-seven baseline factors including demographic characteristics, clinical features, biochemical indexes and previous treatment histories were selected.

RESULTS

In total patients, history of drink and largest nodule size≥7cm independently predicted worse ORR, DEB-TACE predicted better OS, while largest nodule size≥7cm, increased Child-Pugh stage, ALB abnormal, ALP abnormal or AFP abnormal predicted worse survival. For DEB-TACE group, previous cTACE and ANC abnormal independently predicted worse ORR, and hepatic vein invasion, increased Child-Pugh stage or AFP abnormal independently predicted poor survival. For cTACE group, largest nodule size≥7cm independently predicted poor ORR, and multifocal disease as well as ALB abnormal predicted poor OS.

CONCLUSIONS

History of drink, largest nodule size≥7cm, DEB-TACE, increased Child-Pugh stage, abnormal ALB, ALP or AFP are potential prognostic factors in total patients, previous cTACE and ANC abnormal, hepatic vein invasion, increased Child-Pugh stage or AFP abnormal are potential prognostic factors in DEB-TA group, and largest nodule size≥7cm, multifocal disease and ALB abnormal are potential prognostic factors in cTACE group.

Preparation and evaluation of ion-exchange porous polyvinyl alcohol microspheres as a potential drug delivery embolization system

The present study aimed to develop a new drug delivery system with efficient drug loading and sustained drug release for potential application in transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). The porous polyvinyl alcohol microspheres (PPVA MS) were prepared by a combination of inverse emulsification and thermal-induced phase separation (TIPS) method, this was followed by the grafting polymerization of sodium 4-styrene sulfonate (SSS) onto the PPVA MS to obtain the grafted PPVA-g-PSSS MS. The prepared PPVA MS showed a well-defined spherical shape with 'honeycomb-like' porous structure, which could be readily tailored by adjusting the quenching temperature. In vitro biocompatibility analysis indicated the non-cytotoxic and hemocompatible nature of PPVA MS. The porous structure and presence of ionically charged groups in the PPVA-g-PSSS MS favoured the loading of cationic doxorubicin (DOX) onto the MS through ionic-interactions and demonstrated a sustained drug release pattern. Moreover, the cytotoxicity of DOX-loaded PPVA-g-PSSS (DOX@PPVA-g-PSSS) MS against HepG2 cells and the intracellular uptake of DOX demonstrated the potent in vitro antitumor activity. Furthermore, the central auricular artery embolization in rabbits showed that both the PPVA-g-PSSS and DOX@PPVA-g-PSSS MS could occlude the auricular arteries and induced superior embolization effects, such as progressive ear appearance changes, irreversible parenchymal damage and fibrosis, and ultrastructural alternations in endothelial cells. Besides, the DOX fluorescence was distributed around the embolized arteries, without decreasing its intensity when prolonged embolization up to 15 days. These findings suggest that the newly developed DOX@PPVA-g-PSSS MS could be employed as a promising drug-loaded embolic agent for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Balloon occluded TACE (B-TACE) vs DEM-TACE for HCC: a single center retrospective case control study

BACKGROUND

To compare oncological results and safety profile of balloon micro-catheter trans-arterial chemoembolization (b-TACE) and drug-eluting-microsphere (DEM-TACE) in patients with hepatocellular-carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

This is a case-control, retrospective, single-center study. Between January-2015/March-2019, 149 patients (131 males [87.9%]) with 226 HCC were treated, 22 patients (35 HCC; 19 [86.4%] males) with b-TACE and 127 with DEM-TACE (191 HCC, 112 [88.2%] males). Embolization protocol was standardized (sequential 100 ± 25 and 200 ± 25 μm microspheres). Results were evaluated by modified-response-evaluation-criteria-in-solid-tumor [mRECIST] at 1, 3-6 and 9-12 months and time to recurrence after complete response [TTR] at 1 years. Cox's regression weighted with tumor dimensions was performed. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded.

RESULTS

mRECIST oncological response at all time points (1, 3-6 and 9-12 months) for both treatments were similar, with the exception of Objective response rate at 9-12 months. Objective response at 1 and 3-6 months between b-TACE vs DEM-TACE [23/35 (65.7%) vs 119/191 (62.3%), 21/29 (72.4%) vs 78/136 (57.4%) (p > 0.05), respectively]. On the contrary, at 9-12 months, it was significantly higher in b-TACE subgroup than DEM-TACE (15/19 [78.9%] vs 48/89 [53.9%], p = 0.05). TTR for complete response at 1 year had a better trend for b-TACE vs DEM-TACE (278.0 days [196.0-342.0] vs 219.0 days [161.0-238.0], OR 0.68 [0.4-1.0], p = 0.10). The use of balloon micro-catheter reduced the relative risk of the event of recurrence by 0.63 [CI95% 0.38-1.04]; p = 0.07). No significant differences were found in AEs rate.

CONCLUSION

b-TACE showed a trend of better oncological response over DEM-TACE with and longer TTR with a similar adverse events rate, in patients presenting with larger tumors.

Locoregional Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: What Has Changed in the Past Ten Years?

The evolution of locoregional therapies in the last decade has been refined with improved patient selection and a development of a more personalized approach. In doing so, there has been associated improved outcomes and less toxicity. With the rapidly changing landscape of systemic therapy, the role of locoregional therapies alone or in combination for downstaging and curative intent will continue to evolve.

Drug-eluting Bead-Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Refractory to Conventional Lipiodol-based Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization

Purpose

To evaluate the potential of drug-eluting bead (DEB)-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) as a treatment option for patients with refractory to conventional lipiodol-based TACE (c-TACE) especially with decreased liver function.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the treatment results of DEB-TACE for 89 HCC nodules in 27 patients with c-TACE refractory according to liver function.

Results

Although overall survival was significantly better in Child–Pugh A patients than in Child–Pugh B patients (median survival time, MST: 561 vs 347 days, p=0.031), progression-free survival was almost similar in both patients between Child–Pugh A and B (MST: 79 vs 87 days, p=0.534). Regarding antitumor response, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease-control rate (DCR) were 5.3/12.5% and 52.7/87.5% in Child–Pugh A/B, respectively. In each 89 HCC nodules, ORR and DCR were almost similar between Child–Pugh A and B (ORR, 20.3 vs 13.3%; DCR, 77.0 vs 73.3%, respectively). Adverse events of DEB-TACE were well-tolerated, and liver function was reserved during DEB-TACE procedures.

Conclusion

DEB-TACE could be a therapeutic option for advanced HCC patients with c-TACE refractory and decreased liver function.

Combination of Bronchial Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy plus Drug-Eluting Embolic Transarterial Chemoembolization for Treatment of Advanced Lung Cancer-A Retrospective Analysis of 23 Patients

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy and safety of the combination of bronchial arterial infusion (BAI) chemotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization with the use of drug-eluting embolic (DEE) particles in the treatment of unresectable advanced lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 23 patients with unresectable lung cancer (stage III/IV) who received BAI chemotherapy and DEE chemoembolization. Treatment response was assessed by enhanced CT and evaluated on the basis of Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors at 30 d after the last combination treatment. Patients were followed up until death or March 15, 2020, whichever was first. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and factors associated with OS were evaluated by Cox proportional-hazards test.

RESULTS

Complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were seen in 2, 16, 5, and 0 patients at 30 d after the last combination treatment, respectively; therefore, the overall response rate was 78.3% and the disease control rate was 100%. Preprocedure symptoms (hemoptysis in 7 patients and dyspnea in 10) resolved in all cases after combination therapy. Nineteen patients died during follow-up, and 4 survived. Median OS was 15.6 mo (95% confidence interval, 10.1-21.1 mo). On univariate analysis and multivariate analysis, tumor/node/metastasis staging was an independent risk factor for prognosis. There were no serious adverse events during the procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of BAI chemotherapy plus DEE chemoembolization appears to be a promising method for treatment of advanced lung cancer.

Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization sequentially combined with radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of untreated and recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoem-bolization (DEB-TACE) has the advantages of slow and steady release, high local concentration, and low incidence of adverse drug reactions compared to the traditional TACE. DEB-TACE combined with sequentially ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy has strong anti-cancer effects and little side effects, but there are fewer related long-term studies until now.

AIM

To explore the outcome of DEB-TACE sequentially combined with RFA for patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Seventy-six patients with primary HCC who underwent DEB-TACE sequentially combined with RFA were recruited. Forty patients with untreated HCC were included in Group A, and 36 patients with recurrent HCC were included in Group B. In addition, 40 patients with untreated HCC who were treated with hepatectomy were included in Group C. The serological examination, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging examination, and post-treatment computed tomography enhanced examination were performed for all patients. The efficacy was graded as complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), stable disease and progressive disease at the 3rd, 6th, and 9th. All patients were followed up for 3 years and their overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed.

RESULTS

The efficacy of Group A and Group C was similar (P > 0.05), but the alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and total bilirubin of Group A were lower than those of Group C (all P < 0.05). The proportions of CR (32.5%), PR (37.5%) were slightly higher than Group A (CR: 27.5%, PR: 35%), but the difference was not statistically significant (χ 2 = 0.701, P = 0.873). No operational-related deaths occurred in Group A and Group C. The OS (97.5%, 84.7%, and 66.1%) and the DFS (75.0%, 51.7%, and 35.4%) of Group A at the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd year after treatment were similar with those of Group C (OS: 90.0%, 79.7%, and 63.8%; DFS: 80.0%, 59.7%, and 48.6%; P > 0.05). The OS rates in Group A and Group B (90%, 82.3%, and 66.4%) were similar (P > 0.05). The DFS rates in Group B (50%, 31.6%, and 17.2%) were lower than that of Group A (P = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of DEA-TACE combined with RFA for untreated HCC is similar with hepatectomy. Patients with recurrent HCC could get a longer survival time through the combined treatment.

Prediction of Survival Among Patients Receiving Transarterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Response-Based Approach

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The heterogeneity of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the widespread use of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) outside recommended guidelines have encouraged the development of scoring systems that predict patient survival. The aim of this study was to build and validate statistical models that offer individualized patient survival prediction using response to TACE as a variable.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Clinically relevant baseline parameters were collected for 4,621 patients with HCC treated with TACE at 19 centers in 11 countries. In some of the centers, radiological responses (as assessed by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [mRECIST]) were also accrued. The data set was divided into a training set, an internal validation set, and two external validation sets. A pre-TACE model ("Pre-TACE-Predict") and a post-TACE model ("Post-TACE-Predict") that included response were built. The performance of the models in predicting overall survival (OS) was compared with existing ones. The median OS was 19.9 months. The factors influencing survival were tumor number and size, alpha-fetoprotein, albumin, bilirubin, vascular invasion, cause, and response as assessed by mRECIST. The proposed models showed superior predictive accuracy compared with existing models (the hepatoma arterial embolization prognostic score and its various modifications) and allowed for patient stratification into four distinct risk categories whose median OS ranged from 7 months to more than 4 years.

CONCLUSIONS

A TACE-specific and extensively validated model based on routinely available clinical features and response after first TACE permitted patient-level prognostication.

Drug-Eluting Microsphere Versus Cisplatin-Based Transarterial Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with 30- to 60-μm drug-eluting microspheres with those of cisplatin-based TACE in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS. This retrospective single-center study included 607 patients who underwent drug-eluting microsphere (30-60 μm, loaded with doxorubicin) TACE (n = 119) or cisplatin-based TACE (n = 488) as first-line treatment of unresectable HCC between April 2017 and April 2018. With a propensity model correcting for selection bias, patients were selected from each treatment group to compare the effectiveness of drug-eluting microsphere TACE with that of cisplatin TACE. RESULTS. In the entire study population, the rates of major complications (1.7% vs 1.8%, p > 0.999), objective tumor response (80.7% vs 79.7%, p = 0.899), and time to progression (p = 0.536) were not significantly different between the drug-eluting microsphere TACE and cisplatin TACE groups. However, the drug-eluting microsphere TACE group had significantly higher objective tumor regression rates in subgroups with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C disease (p = 0.033) and a maximal tumor size larger than 5 cm (p = 0.011). After adjustment by propensity score matching, the rates of major complications, objective tumor response, and time to progression remained similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION. Both TACE with 30- to 60-μm drug-eluting microspheres and cisplatin TACE were safe and effective for treating unresectable HCC. In patients with BCLC stage C disease and patients with large (> 5 cm) HCCs, TACE with 30- to 60-μm drug-eluting micro-spheres may have a better chance of obtaining an objective tumor response than conventional TACE performed with the protocol used in this study.

Long Noncoding RNA TRIM52-AS1 Sponges miR-514a-5p to Facilitate Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression Through Increasing MRPS18A

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with high morbidity and mortality and has become the most frequently diagnosed liver cancer globally. Long noncoding RNAs have been widely studied because they exert essential functions in human diseases. Aim of the Study: The aim of the study is to explore the role and molecular regulatory mechanism of TRIM52-AS1 in HCC. Materials and Methods: Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction examined TRIM52-AS1, miR-514a-5p, and mitochondrial ribosomal protein S18a (MRPS18A) expression in HCC cells. Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8), colony formation, flow cytometry, JC-1, transwell, and Western blot assays uncovered the function of TRIM52-AS1 in HCC. RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP), RNA pull down, and luciferase reporter assays validated the association among TRIM52-AS1, miR-514a-5p, and MRPS18A. Nuclear-cytoplasmic fractionation assay revealed the subcellular location of TRIM52-AS1 in HCC cells. Results: TRIM52-AS1 was revealed to be upregulated in HCC tissue samples according to GEPIA database. Consistent results were recognized in HCC cell lines. Subsequently, loss-of-function assays confirmed that TRIM52-AS1 ablation depressed cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition process in vitro and inhibited tumor growth in vivo. Furthermore, the authors validated TRIM52-AS1 bound with miR-514a-5p in HCC. TRIM52-AS1 inversely regulated miR-514a-5p expression. Afterward, MRPS18A was identified to be a downstream target of miR-514a-5p. Ultimately, rescue assays manifested that MRPS18A upregulation could neutralize the attenuated effects resulting from TRIM52-AS1 deficiency. Conclusions: All in all, TRIM52-AS1 sponged miR-514a-5p to facilitate HCC progression through increasing MRPS18A expression. The findings highlight TRIM52-AS1 as a novel therapeutic target for HCC.

Nanosized drug-eluting bead for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (ND-TACE)

Dextran-coated arsenite nanoparticles benefit interventional therapy by occluding tumor feeding vessels and sustainable release of arsenic trioxide.

A machine learning model to predict hepatocellular carcinoma response to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization

PURPOSE

Some patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are more likely to experience disease progression despite transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) treatment, and thus would benefit from early switching to other therapeutic regimens. We sought to evaluate a fully automated machine learning algorithm that uses pre-therapeutic quantitative computed tomography (CT) image features and clinical factors to predict HCC response to TACE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Outcome information from 105 patients receiving first-line treatment with TACE was evaluated retrospectively. The primary clinical endpoint was time to progression (TTP) based on follow-up CT radiological criteria (mRECIST). A 14-week cutoff was used to classify patients as TACE-susceptible (TTP ≥14 weeks) or TACE-refractory (TTP <14 weeks). Response to TACE was predicted using a random forest classifier with the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage and quantitative image features as input as well as the BCLC stage alone as a control.

RESULTS

The model's response prediction accuracy rate was 74.2% (95% CI=64%-82%) using a combination of the BCLC stage plus quantitative image features versus 62.9% (95% CI= 52%-72%) using the BCLC stage alone. Shape image features of the tumor and background liver were the dominant features correlated to the TTP as selected by the Boruta method and were used to predict the outcome.

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study demonstrates that quantitative image features obtained prior to therapy can improve the accuracy of predicting response of HCC to TACE. This approach is likely to provide useful information for aiding HCC patient selection for TACE.

Comparison of Treatment Response and Survival Profiles Between Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization and Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Chinese Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

This study evaluated the difference in treatment response and survival profiles between drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) and conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) treatments in Chinese hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. A total of 120 HCC patients were consecutively enrolled in this prospective cohort study, which showed that DEB-TACE achieved higher complete response (CR) (30.8%) compared with cTACE (7.4%) with no difference in overall response rate (ORR) for patients treated with DEB-TACE and cTACE (80.8% vs. 73.5%). In addition, DEB-TACE was associated with a lower rate of progressive disease (PD) compared with cTACE (1.9% vs. 11.8%). With respect to survival, patients in the DEB-TACE group achieved median progression-free survival (PFS) of 15 months (95% CI 12-18 months), which was longer than the cTACE group [median PFS 11 months (95% CI 10-12 months)]. Median overall survival (OS) was also longer with DEB-TACE [25 months (95% CI 22-28 months)] when compared with cTACE [21 months (95% CI 18-24 months)]. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that DEB-TACE was an independent predictive factor for achieving CR. Univariate Cox's regression analysis revealed that DEB-TACE was a predictive factor for prolonged PFS and OS, while multivariate analysis demonstrated that DEB-TACE was not an independent factor for predicting PFS or OS. In conclusion, we found that DEB-TACE achieved higher treatment response and prolonged survival compared with cTACE in Chinese HCC patients.

Effectiveness of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization for small hepatocellular carcinoma in Child-Pugh class A patients

Background:

This study aimed to compare the therapeutic effectiveness including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) and drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in a superselective fashion for the patients with nodular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (n ⩽ 5) and Child–Pugh class A.

Methods:

A total of 198 consecutive patients with nodular HCCs (n ⩽ 5) and Child–Pugh class A liver function who were initially treated with cTACE (n = 125) or DEB-TACE (n = 57) were included retrospectively. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints included time-to-target lesion progression (TTTLP), OS, and safety.

Results:

The median follow up was 62 months (range, 1–87 months). The PFS was significantly longer in the cTACE group than in the DEB-TACE group (median, 18 months versus 7 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.658, log-rank p = 0.031), whereas OS was comparable (log-rank p = 0.299). TTTLP was significantly longer in the cTACE group than in the DEB-TACE group (median, 34 months versus 11 months; log-rank p < 0.001). In the stratification analysis based on tumor size, the cTACE group showed significantly longer TTTLP than the DEB-TACE group in the 1.0–2.0 cm and 2.1–3.0 cm subgroups (HR = 0.188, log-rank p < 0.001 and HR = 0.410, p = 0.015, respectively) but not in the 3.1–5.0 cm and 5.1–10.0 cm subgroups (all p > 0.05). Postembolization syndrome occurred more frequently in the cTACE group than in the DEB-TACE group (p = 0.006).

Conclusions:

DEB-TACE is followed by significantly shorter PFS than cTACE in patients with nodular HCCs (n ⩽ 5) and Child–Pugh class A, although OS is comparable. Postembolization syndrome occurs more frequently in cTACE than in DEB-TACE.

Efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) combined with radiofrequency ablation versus DEB-TACE alone in Chinese hepatocellular carcinoma patients

To compare the efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation (DEB-TACE+RFA) versus DEB-TACE alone in Chinese hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.The 28 patients receiving DEB-TACE+RFA and 74 HCC patients receiving DEB-TACE were recruited in this study. Treatment responses, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.One to 3 months after treatments, the proportion of patients achieving complete response (CR) (78.6% vs 33.8%, P <.001) and objective response rate (ORR) (92.9% vs 78.4%, P =.010) were elevated in DEB-TACE+RFA group compared with DEB-TACE group. Multivariate logistic regression displayed that DEB-TACE+RFA was an independently predicting factor for better CR (P = .006). Subgroup analysis of CR achievement illuminated that DEB-TACE+RFA disclosed better CR achievement in patients with history of cirrhosis (P <.001), tumor located in right liver (P = .003), bilobar disease (P = .013), tumor size <3.3 cm (P = .001), no portal vein invasion (P = .001), no hepatic vein invasion (P <.001), Child-pugh stage A (P <.001), Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0, A-B (P <.001), abnormal alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (P = .001) and normal AFP (P = .016). The PFSs were similar between 2 groups (P = .112), however, the OS was more prolonged in DEB-TACE+RFA group (P = .025) compared with DEB-TACE group. And subgroup analysis displayed that PFS of patients with largest nodule size >3.3 cm (P = .025) was longer and patients with unilobar disease (P = .009), and patients with no hepatic invasion (P = .019) and Child-pugh stage A (P = .037) had more favorable OS in DEB-TACE+RFA group compared with DEB-TACE group.DEB-TACE+RFA achieved better treatment responses and OS compared with DEB-TACE alone in Chinese HCC patients.

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) vs conventional TACE in treating hepatocellular carcinoma patients with multiple conventional TACE treatments history: A comparison of efficacy and safety

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) vs conventional TACE (cTACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with multiple cTACE treatments history.Eighty-one HCC patients with multiple cTACE treatments history who underwent DEB-TACE (N = 42) and cTACE treatment (N = 39) were included in this retrospective cohort study and allocated to DEB-TACE and cTACE groups accordingly. Multiple cTACE treatments history was defined as history of three or more cycles cTACE treatments. Then treatment responses were assessed according to the criteria of modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), and progression free survival (PFS), as well as overall survival (OS), was calculated. In addition, adverse events and liver function related indexes were recorded.Complete response (P = .167) was of no difference while objective response rate (ORR) (P = .003) was increased in DEB-TACE group compared with cTACE group. Patients in DEB-TACE group presented with more favorable PFS (P = .028) and OS (P = .037) compared with cTACE group. Further analysis revealed that DEB-TACE (vs cTACE) was an independent predictive factor for better ORR (P = .001), PFS (P = .006) and OS (P = .001). The albumin (ALB) level at first month after treatment was elevated (P = .015) while the other liver function indexes levels did not vary (all P > .05) in DEB-TACE group compared with cTACE group. The incidences of pain (P = .327), fever (P = .171) and nausea/vomiting (P = .400) during hospitalization were similar between the 2 groups.DEB-TACE is more efficient and equally tolerant compared with cTACE in HCC patients with multiple cTACE treatments history.

Review of therapies for intermediate and advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma, not suitable for curative therapies: a rapidly changing landscape

Recent clinical trials and new agents have permitted greater clarity in the choice of effective agents for that majority of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who have advanced disease at diagnosis and thus cannot be offered potentially curative resection, ablation or liver transplantation. The main treatment for these patients remains chemoembolization, although evidence for selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with SIR-Spheres or Theraphere, is beginning to suggest that the results with this may be comparable with less toxicity. Patients who have failed chemoembolization or SIRT or have metastatic disease at presentation are suitable for the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib (nexavar) or newly-approved lenvatinib (lenvima) as first line therapies. The choice between which of them to use first is not currently clear. Patients who have failed sorafenib can be offered a choice of FDA-approved regorafenib (stivarga) or immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab (opdivo) as second line agents. For that considerable percent of patients presenting with macroscopic portal vein thrombosis, the choice appears to be between multikinase inhibitor or SIRT, given the potential toxicity of chemoembolization in this setting. However, considering the potency of both nivolumab and regorafenib and the pipeline of new agents such as atezolizumab (tecentriq) in current clinical trials, including new immune checkpoint inhibitors, this landscape may change within a couple of years, especially if new evidence arises for the superior effectiveness of combinations of any of these agents over single agents.

Update on Transarterial Chemoembolization with Drug-Eluting Microspheres for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (c-TACE) is a widely used first-line palliative treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite the effectiveness of c-TACE, to date, technique and procedure scheduling has not yet been standardized. Drug-eluting microspheres (DEMs) were therefore introduced to ensure more sustained and tumor-selective drug delivery for permanent embolization. These DEMs can load various drugs and release them in a sustained manner over a prolonged period. This approach ensures the delivery of high concentrations of chemotherapeutic agents to tumors, without increasing systemic concentrations, and promote tumor ischemia and necrosis. This review summarizes the recent advances in the use of DEM-TACE to treat HCC.

Analysis of survival and prognostic factors in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in Spanish patients with drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) improves the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intermediate stage [i.e. Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-B (BCLC-B)]. The aim of our study was to analyse the overall survival (OS) and prognostic factors of patients with HCC treated with DEB-TACE.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients' clinical course was recorded from January 2005 to July 2014. The median OS was obtained by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. The prognosis factors associated with OS were determined by a multivariate Cox regression analysis and the accuracy of the OS prediction was determined by calculation of the assessment for retreatment with TACE score (ART score).

RESULTS

A cohort of 147 consecutive patients treated with DEB-TACE was included. Median age of the patients was 73.4 years. Overall, 68.7% were men, and all had cirrhosis, with 68.8% being hepatisis C virus positive. Moreover, 35.2% were staged as BCLC-A and 60.2% as BCLC-B. After a median follow-up of 19.2 months, 29.3% were alive, 4.3% needed treatment with sorafenib and 56.1% underwent DEB-TACE retreatment. Median OS was 22.8 [95% confidence interval (CI)=19.6-25.9]. After censoring for ascites and more than one nodule, OS was 23.87 (95% CI =20.72-27.01) and 26.89 (95% CI =21.00-32.78), respectively. The risk of death decreased by 22.3% with the number of DEB-TACE sessions (hazard ratio=0.777) and increased by 25.9% with higher Child-Pugh score (hazard ratio=1.259). Overall, 61.2% of the cohort had an ART score between 0 and 1.5. There were no statistical differences in OS between cohort groups with ART of 0-1.5 and at least 2.5.

CONCLUSION

The results validate the efficacy and safety of DEB-TACE in patients with HCC and the importance of some prognostic factors for patient survival.

Reason of Discontinuation After Transarterial Chemoembolization Influences Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often repeated until unTACEable progression (UTP) occurs. There is little data on the various reasons for stopping TACE and its consequences for subsequent treatment and survival.

Aim

To assess the impact of the various reasons of UTP on survival and consequences for subsequent treatments.

Methods

Consecutive HCC patients who underwent TACE between 2003 and 2016 were analyzed retrospectively for the reason of TACE discontinuation. UTP was defined according to the EASL guidelines, considering radiological pattern of progression, liver function and performance status (PS). Overall and post-progression survival (OS, PPS) for different reasons of TACE discontinuation were compared. The correlation between time to untreatable progression by chemoembolization (TTUPc) and OS was analyzed.

Results

One hundred and sixty-six patients (BCLC-A 40%, BCLC-B 54%, BCLC-C: 7%) were included, undergoing a median of 2 TACE procedures with a median OS of 22.1 months (95% CI 17.4–26.7). UTP occurred in 116 patients (70%) after a median TTUPc of 11.6 months (95% CI 7.8–15.4). There was a strong positive correlation (ρ = 0.816, p < 0.001) between TTUPc and OS. The main reason of UTP was radiological progression (61%), which was mostly intrahepatic (75%). Hepatic decompensation and worsening of PS were independent predictors of OS and PPS.

Conclusion

The majority of HCC patients treated with TACE have UTP due to intrahepatic tumor progression with preserved liver function and PS, making them potential candidates for subsequent liver-directed or systemic treatment. TTUPc may be a valuable surrogate endpoint for OS in patients treated with TACE.

Level of Evidence

Level II, prognosis study.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00270-018-2118-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Quality of life in patients undergoing repetitive TACE for the treatment of intermediate stage HCC

PURPOSE

With a limited overall survival (OS) of 20 months in patients diagnosed with intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the preservation of quality of life (QoL) during transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) procedures remains a primary goal. The aim of our study was to evaluate the change in QoL amongst patients undergoing repetitive TACE and to identify specific risk factors that may predict change in QoL.

METHODS

QoL was assessed in 82 patients undergoing at least two TACE, before and 14 days after TACE, using validated EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC HCC18 questionnaires. Tumour response was assessed using established response criteria. Laboratory and clinical parameters were analysed.

RESULTS

Functional scores decreased due to first TACE treatment (p < 0.01), conversely symptom scores increased significantly (p < 0.01). During repetitive TACE no statistically significant changes were observed. Higher Global Health- and Physical Functioning scores at baseline were identified as independent prognostic factors for greater decrease in QoL. Tumour response did not alter QoL at all. Furthermore higher symptom scales including pain (p = 0.00), nausea and vomiting (p = 0.00) and fever (p < 0.01 for repetitive TACE) at baseline were predictive of a significantly lesser increase of symptom severity, and a greater reduction in pain during a course of TACE. Higher C-reactive protein (CRP) at baseline and female gender were associated with a greater decrease of functional scales and increase of symptom scales.

CONCLUSION

QoL amongst patients receiving repetitive TACE showed neither significant nor clinically relevant changes over time. Pre-treatment assessment of QoL-scores, clinical and laboratory parameters can improve patient selection for TACE whilst optimizing QoL.

Does neoadjuvant doxorubicin drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization improve survival in patients undergoing liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma?

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare the overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma who did and did not have neoadjuvant doxorubicin drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 94 patients with HCC transplanted between 2000 and 2014 in a single tertiary center. Pre- and postoperative features, DFS and OS were compared between patients who received pre-OLT DEB-TACE (n=34, DEB-TACE group) and those who did not (n=60, non-TACE group). Radiologic and histologic response to neoadjuvant treatment as well as its complications were also studied.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in post-transplantation DFS and OS rates between groups (5-year DFS: 70% in DEB-TACE group vs. 63% in non-TACE group, P = 0.454; 5-year OS: 70% in DEB-TACE group vs. 65% in non-TACE group, P = 0.532). The DEB-TACE group had longer OLT waiting time compared with the non-TACE group (110 vs. 72 days; P = 0.01). On univariate and multivariate analyses, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels >500 ng/mL prior to OLT were associated with decreased OS and DFS regardless of neoadjuvant approach (hazard ratio of 6, P = 0.001 and 5.5, P = 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent neoadjuvant DEB-TACE and OLT for hepatocellular carcinoma had no statistically different OS or DFS at 3 and 5 years from patients undergoing OLT alone.

CalliSpheres® drug-eluting beads (DEB) transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is equally efficient and safe in liver cancer patients with different times of previous conventional TACE treatments: a result from CTILC study

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in liver cancer patients with different times of previous conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) treatments.

METHODS

367 liver cancer patients about to receive DEB-TACE treatment were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. All patients were divided into no previous cTACE group (NPC group), 1-2 times previous cTACE group (PC group) and triple or above previous cTACE group (TPC group) according to the times of previous cTACE treatments.

RESULTS

There was no difference in complete response (CR) (P = 0.671) and objective response rate (ORR) (P = 0.062) among three groups. Additionally, no difference in overall survival (OS) among groups (P = 0.899) was found. As to liver function, most liver function indexes were deteriorative at 1 week after DEB-TACE operation, but returned to baseline at 1-3 months after DEB-TACE operation in all three groups, while percentage of abnormal total bile acid (TBA) patients was higher in TPC group than NPC and PC groups at 1-3 month post-DEB-TACE (P = 0.018). As for safety profiles, the incidence of pain during DEB-TACE operation was lower in TPC group compared to NPC and PC groups (P = 0.005), while no difference of other adverse events was found during and 1 month post-DEB-TACE treatment among three groups.

CONCLUSION

DEB-TACE treatment was equally efficient and tolerated in liver cancer patients with different times of previous cTACE treatments.

Repeated Transarterial Chemoembolization with Degradable Starch Microspheres (DSMs-TACE) of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to: a) evaluate tumor response rates using modified-Response-evaluation-criteria-in-solid-tumors (mRecist) criteria, b) evaluate safety of Degradable Starch Microspheres Trans-arterial-chemo-embolization (DSMs-TACE) for unresectable hepatocellular-carcinoma (HCC) treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 24 HCC cirrhotic patients (21/3 M/F, mean age 66.3 years) to be treated with repeated DSMs-TACE procedures, performed at 4-6 week intervals on the basis of tumor response and patients tolerance. Clinical and biochemical evaluations were performed before and after each procedure. Treatment response was also assessed by Computed-tomography (CT) or Magnetic-resonance-imaging (MRI)-scan 4-6 weeks following each procedure.

RESULTS

In our experience, DSMs-TACE was both safe and effective. A total of 53 DSMs-TACE procedures were performed (2.2 per patient). No procedure-related death was observed. Complete Response (CR) was observed in 5/24 (20.8%), 4/17 (23.5%) and 5/12 (41.6%) patients after the first, second and third procedure, respectively. At the end of each treatment, all patients experienced at least a partial response. At the end of the repeated procedures, no differences between mono- or bi-lobar disease were observed in patients with CR (64.2% vs 50%; p=ns). In most cases, treatment discontinuation was due to worsening liver function.

CONCLUSION

DSMs-TACE is a valid, well-tolerated alternative treatment to Lipiodol-TACE or DEB-TACE, as it has demonstrated to achieve a relatively high percentage of complete tumor necrosis. CR rates were similar between patients with mono- or bi-lobar disease indicating the possibility of carrying-out repeated procedure in a safe and effective way in both types of patients.

TransArterial ChemoEmbolization (TACE) with platinum versus anthracyclines for hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical efficacy of TACE with platinum versus anthracyclines for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients using a meta-analysis.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library database to discover relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Data on therapeutic response, adverse event and overall survival rate from studies that compared TACE with platinum versus anthracyclines for HCC patients was extracted for pooled estimation. Subgroup analysis was used if further investigation was needed. The Q statistic and the I² index statistic were used to assess heterogeneity. Publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test.

RESULTS

Four RCTs and seven observational studies containing 1405 patients were included in this meta-analysis. After comparing RCTs and observational studies separately, the pooled estimation results indicated that no significant difference existed between platinum and anthracyclines regarding therapeutic response, adverse event and overall survival rate. Furthermore, Egger's test revealed bias in pooled estimation of survival rate among RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on current results, we concluded that TACE with platinum revealed similar clinical efficacy compared with anthracyclines. And more relative studies in this field were expected in the future.

Tumor SOCS3 methylation status predicts the treatment response to TACE and prognosis in HCC patients

BACKGROUND

Suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) 1 and 3 methylation have been associated with clinical features and outcomes of cancer patients. However, their roles in determining the treatment response to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain unknown.

RESULTS

We found that presence of SOCS3 methylation is significantly associated with the major clinical features of HCC patients, including tumor stage, lymph node and vascular invasion. Of note, we observed that the presence of SOCS3 methylation is closely related to TACE response. In prognosis analyses, HCC patients with SOCS3 methylation presence have a poorer prognosis indicated by lower 3-, and 5-year survival rates and shorter mean survival period, than those without. Multivariate COX analysis confirms the prognostic role of the presence of SOCS3 methylation in HCC patients receiving TACE treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 246 HCC patients receiving TACE were enrolled in this study. Tumor samples was obtained from echo-guided fine needle aspiration and genomic DNA from tumor samples was purified. SOCS1 and SOCS3 methylation status were detected using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. The treatment responses to TACE of patients were evaluated after procedure and all patients were followed for prognosis analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This finding suggests that the presence of SOCS3 methylation is a marker to predict treatment response and prognosis in HCC patients receiving TACE therapy.

Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy as a viable option for treatment of advanced breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis and literature review

This meta-analysis was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-based regimens for the treatment advanced breast cancer (ABC). Altogether 15 studies involving 8195 ABC patients were retrieved for analysis. Compared with non-gemcitabine-based chemotherapies, patients receiving gemcitabine-based therapy exhibited better overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) (HR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.19; HR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.30; HR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.24). Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was significantly high but manageable in gemcitabine-based groups. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy had better OS (HR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.32), PFS (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.27), and ORR (RR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.32). In addition, additional gemcitabine chemotherapy also showed better OS (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.30), PFS (HR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.30) and ORR (RR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.42) than gemcitabine replacement therapy. Furthermore, patients receiving gemcitabine-taxanes-based regimens had better OS (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.28), PFS (HR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.20) and ORR (RR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.35) than patients with non-gemcitabine-taxanes-based chemotherapy. These findings indicate that gemcitabine combination regimens could serve as a promising regimen for ABC patients, though increased hematologic toxicity should be considered with caution.

Drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current state of the art

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) represents the current gold standard for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients in intermediate stage. Conventional TACE (cTACE) is performed with the injection of an emulsion of a chemotherapeutic drug with lipiodol into the artery feeding the tumoral nodules, followed by embolization of the same vessel to obtain a synergistic effect of drug cytotoxic activity and ischemia. Aim of this review is to summarize the main characteristics of drug-eluting beads (DEB)-TACE and the clinical results reported so far in the literature. A literature search was conducted using PubMed until June 2017. In order to overcome the drawbacks of cTACE, namely lack of standardization and unpredictability of outcomes, non-absorbable embolic microspheres charged with cytotoxic agents (DEBs) have been developed. DEBs are able to simultaneously exert both the therapeutic components of TACE, either drug-carrier function and embolization, unlike cTACE in which applying the embolic agent is a second moment after drug injection. This way, risk of systemic drug release is minimal due to both high-affinity carrier activity of DEBs and absence of a time interval between injection and embolization. However, despite promising results of preliminary studies, clear evidence of superiority of DEB-TACE over cTACE is still lacking. A number of novel technical devices are actually in development in the field of loco-regional treatments for HCC, but only a few of them have entered the clinical arena. In absence of well-designed randomized-controlled trials, the decision on whether use DEB-TACE or cTACE is still controversial.

Healthcare costs of transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

A meta-analysis comparing drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) has recently been published. On balance, no significant differences were found in terms of objective response and overall survival. The impact on healthcare costs had been studied in small series based on a hypothetical model and was in favor of DEB-TACE. We aimed to evaluate and compare health-care costs and effectiveness of both modalities in a cohort of patients from Nottingham, UK.

Methods

Using a dedicated radiology database, we identified all patients who had undergone cTACE or DEB-TACE between 2006 and 2012 at a single tertiary referral center based in Nottingham. We collected clinical data, including treatment response, postprocedure complications and 30-day mortality. Costing models were constructed to present both our local hospital perspective as well as the national health service position.

Results

During our study period, 101 procedures were performed on 43 patients (76 cTACE procedures on 26 patients and 25 DEB-TACE procedures on 17 patients). Overall, 11/26 in cTACE and 5/17 in DEB-TACE group had progressive disease (p=0.52). Adverse events were seen in 6/76 cTACE compared with 7/25 DEB-TACE group (p=0.16). Based on the predetermined standard pathway there was an unadjusted average cost difference of £3770.30 (TACE =£9070.44, DEB-TACE =£5300.14) in favor of the DEB-TACE. Results from our costing models indicated a £2715.33 (95% CI £580.88–4849.77) cost difference in favor of the same procedure.

Conclusions

Even when the extra costs of DEB-TACE were considered, the overall treatment costs per patient were lower in relation to cTACE.