Intraprocedural computed tomography/magnetic resonance-contrast-enhanced ultrasound fusion imaging improved thermal ablation effect of hepatocellular carcinoma: Comparison with conventional ultrasound

Fusion imaging versus ultrasound-guided percutaneous thermal ablation of liver cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous thermal ablation has become an alternative treatment for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recent evidence suggests that fusion imaging (FI) may improve the feasibility and efficacy of thermal ablation for HCC, while the clinical evidence remains limited.

PURPOSE

To compare FI versus ultrasound-guided thermal ablation for HCC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Relevant cohort or randomized controlled trials were found by searching Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase. The pooling of results was performed using a random-effects model incorporating heterogeneity.

RESULTS

In this meta-analysis, 15 studies involving 1472 patients (1831 tumors) for FI-guided ablation and 1380 patients (1864 tumors) for ultrasound-guided ablation were included. Pooled results showed that compared to conventional HCC ablation guided by ultrasound, the FI-guided procedure showed a similar technique efficacy rate (risk ratio [RR] = 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00-1.02, P = 0.25; I2 = 30%). However, FI-guided tumor ablation was associated with a lower incidence of overall complications (RR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.50-0.97, P = 0.03; I2 = 0%). Moreover, patients receiving FI-guided tumor ablation had a lower risk of local tumor progression during follow-up than those with ultrasound-guided ablation (RR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.47-0.78, P < 0.001; I2 = 13%). Subgroup analysis according to FI strategy, imaging techniques in controls, and tumor diameter showed consistent results (p for subgroup difference all >0.05).

CONCLUSION

FI-guided thermal ablation may be more effective and safer than ultrasound-guided ablation for patients with HCC.

Efficacy of fusion imaging for immediate post-ablation assessment of malignant liver neoplasms: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous thermal ablation has become the preferred therapeutic treatment option for liver cancers that cannot be resected. Since ablative zone tissue changes over time, it becomes challenging to determine therapy effectiveness over an extended period. Thus, an immediate post-procedural evaluation of the ablation zone is crucial, as it could influence the need for a second-look treatment or follow-up plan. Assessing treatment response immediately after ablation is essential to attain favorable outcomes. This study examines the efficacy of image fusion strategies immediately post-ablation in liver neoplasms to determine therapeutic response.

METHODOLOGY

A comprehensive systematic search using PRISMA methodology was conducted using EMBASE, MEDLINE (via PUBMED), and Cochrane Library Central Registry electronic databases to identify articles that assessed the immediate post-ablation response in malignant hepatic tumors with fusion imaging (FI) systems. The data were retrieved on relevant clinical characteristics, including population demographics, pre-intervention clinical history, lesion characteristics, and intervention type. For the outcome metrics, variables such as average fusion time, intervention metrics, technical success rate, ablative safety margin, supplementary ablation rate, technical efficacy rate, LTP rates, and reported complications were extracted.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were included for review after fulfilling the study eligibility criteria. FI's immediate technical success rate ranged from 81.3% to 100% in 17/22 studies. In 16/22 studies, the ablative safety margin was assessed immediately after ablation. Supplementary ablation was performed in 9 studies following immediate evaluation by FI. In 15/22 studies, the technical effectiveness rates during the first follow-up varied from 89.3% to 100%.

CONCLUSION

Based on the studies included, we found that FI can accurately determine the immediate therapeutic response in liver cancer ablation image fusion and could be a feasible intraprocedural tool for determining short-term post-ablation outcomes in unresectable liver neoplasms. There are some technical challenges that limit the widespread adoption of FI techniques. Large-scale randomized trials are warranted to improve on existing protocols. Future research should emphasize improving FI's technological capabilities and clinical applicability to a broader range of tumor types and ablation procedures.

Prevention of major biliary complications by fusion imaging for thermal ablation of malignant liver tumors adjacent to the bile ducts: a preliminary comparative study

PURPOSE

Ultrasound (US)-guided thermal ablation (TA) may cause major biliary complications, particularly in patients with malignant liver tumors (MLTs) adjacent to the bile ducts. Fusion imaging (FI), is postulated to reduce complication rate; however, there is a lack of clinical data to support this theory. Thus, the aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of FI for TA of MLTs proximal to the bile ducts.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center review was conducted on a total of 289 patients with 316 MLTs adjacent to the bile ducts. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether FI was used in the ablation procedures. The choice of the FI-assisted procedure always depends on different operation periods and whether registrations will succeed. The baseline demographics and outcomes of these patients were compared. The efficacy was determined at the 1-month follow-up using contrast-enhanced computed tomography/magnetic resonance. Biliary complications and local tumor progression were subsequently followed-up every 3-6 months. The last follow-up visit was before August 30, 2019.

RESULTS

Among the included tumors, the incidence rate of major biliary complications after ablation in the FI group was 1.6%, which was significantly lower than that in the non-FI group (7.9%, p = 0.005). There was no significant difference in the efficacy rates of the techniques [99.5% (185/186) versus 98.4% (123/125), p = 0.56] or local progression rates [3.8% (7/185) versus 5.7% (7/123), p = 0.61] between the FI and non-FI groups.

CONCLUSION

FI for US-guided TA could be a noninvasive means to decrease major biliary complications. Trial registration number and date of registration: retrospectively registered.

Efficacy and Safety of Fusion Imaging in Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Compared to Ultrasound: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), generally performed under real-time guidance of ultrasound which is safe and effective, is a common minimally invasive therapy for treating hepatocellular carcinoma. Fusion imaging (FI) is a newly developed imaging method, which integrates CT/MRI accurate imaging and matches the characteristics of real-time ultrasound imaging, thereby providing a new approach to guide tumor ablation therapy. However, the efficacy and safety of FI as opposed to ultrasound in tumor ablation remains unclear.

Objective: The present study sought to evaluate the difference in the efficacy and safety between FI and ultrasound in radiofrequency surgery for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma through a metaanalysis.

Materials and Methods: Searching for studies comparing the efficacy and safety of FI and ultrasound in radiofrequency of hepatocellular carcinoma in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for articles published until April 2021. Random or fixed effect models were used for statistical analysis. Metaanalysis and sensitivity analysis were used on the included studies.

Results: A total of six studies met predefined inclusion criteria, and were finally included in the analysis. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses, based on predetermined patient characteristics, allowed minimization of bias. In the RFA of hepatocellular carcinoma, FI decreased 1-year overall survival (OS) when compared with ultrasound. But FI was not significantly different from ultrasound in terms of technical efficiency, 1-, 2-, and 3-year local tumor progression (LTP), complications, as well as 2-year OS. Subgroup analysis, based on tumor mean diameter, showed that FI reduced the rate of 1- and 2-year LTP in patients with tumors of mean diameter ≥15 mm when compared with ultrasound. Moreover, operative complications could be reduced in patients with tumor mean diameter <15 mm using FI, compared with ultrasound.

Conclusion: Overall, these results showed that FI may have some effects on improving efficacy and safety of thermal ablation in HCC patients, relative to ultrasound. However, it may be a more effective method for managing large lesions, as well as those that are difficult to ablate. Further large-scale and well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.

Feasibility and Efficacy of Fusion Imaging Systems for Immediate Post Ablation Assessment of Liver Neoplasms: Protocol for a Rapid Systematic Review

Introduction:

Percutaneous thermal ablation is widely adopted as a curative treatment approach for unresectable liver neoplasms. Accurate immediate assessment of therapeutic response post-ablation is critical to achieve favourable outcomes. The conventional technique of side-by-side comparison of pre- and post-ablation scans is challenging and hence there is a need for improved methods, which will accurately evaluate the immediate post-therapeutic response.

Objectives and Significance:

This review summarizes the findings of studies investigating the feasibility and efficacy of the fusion imaging systems in the immediate post-operative assessment of the therapeutic response to thermal ablation in liver neoplasms. The findings could potentially empower the clinicians with updated knowledge of the state-of-the-art in the assessment of treatment response for unresectable liver neoplasms.

Methods and Analysis:

A rapid review will be performed on publicly available major electronic databases to identify articles reporting the feasibility and efficacy of the fusion imaging systems in the immediate assessment of the therapeutic response to thermal ablation in liver neoplasms. The risk of bias and quality of articles will be assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool 2.0 and Newcastle Ottawa tool.

Ethics and Dissemination:

Being a review, we do not anticipate the need for any approval from the Institutional Review Board. The outcomes of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Highlights

Evaluation of the therapeutic response in liver neoplasms immediately post-ablation is critical to achieve favourable patient outcomes. We will examine the feasibility and technical efficacy of different fusion imaging systems in assessing the immediate treatment response post-ablation. The findings are expected to guide the clinicians with updated knowledge on the state-of-the-art when assessing the immediate treatment response for unresectable liver neoplasms.

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Radiomics for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence Prediction After Thermal Ablation

PURPOSE

To develop a radiomics model based on dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to predict early and late recurrence in patients with a single HCC lesion ≤ 5 cm in diameter after thermal ablation.

PROCEDURES

We enrolled patients who underwent thermal ablation for HCC in our hospital from April 2004 to April 2017. Radiomics based on two branch convolution recurrent network was utilized to analyze preoperative dynamic CEUS image of HCC lesions to establish CEUS model, in comparison to the conventional ultrasound (US), clinical, and combined models. Clinical follow-up of HCC recurrence after ablation were taken as reference standard to evaluate the predicted performance of CEUS model and other models.

RESULTS

We finally analyzed 318 patients (training cohort: test cohort = 255:63). The combined model showed better performance for early recurrence than CUES (in training cohort, AUC, 0.89 vs. 0.84, P < 0.001; in test cohort, AUC, 0.84 vs. 0.83, P = 0.272), US (P < 0.001), or clinical model (P < 0.001). For late recurrence prediction, the combined model showed the best performance than the CEUS (C-index, in training cohort, 0.77 vs. 0.76, P = 0.009; in test cohort, 0.77 vs. 0.68, P < 0.001), US (P < 0.001), or clinical model (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The CEUS model based on dynamic CEUS radiomics performed well in predicting early HCC recurrence after ablation. The combined model combining CEUS, US radiomics, and clinical factors could stratify the high risk of late recurrence.