Iatrogenic pathology of the intestines

Colitis associated with persistent drug-induced immune dysregulation

Adverse drug reactions frequently involve the gastrointestinal tract. We present two cases of colitis that occurred months to years after chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for the treatment of lymphoma. Laboratory tests revealed altered immune status with decreased CD4/CD8 ratio and hypogammaglobinemia (in one patient). The patients had no history of inflammatory bowel disease or immunodeficiency. Biopsies showed chronic active colitis with crypt architectural distortion, erosions, and ulcers as well as pyloric gland metaplasia and loss of plasma cells (in one patient, respectively). Colitis appeared to be related to lymphoma therapy, but could not be attributed to a distinct drug or infectious agent, suggesting the concept of persistent immune dysregulation driving mucosal inflammation. Hence, we suggest "immune dysregulation-associated colitis" (ID-colitis) as an umbrella term for cases of chronic colitis, in which immune dysfunction is evident from blood samples or clinical information and inflammatory bowel disease has been ruled out.

Focal Active Colitis: What Are Its Clinical Implications? A Narrative Review

Focal active colitis (FAC) is described as a histolopathological term indicating the isolated finding of focal neutrophil infiltration in the colonic crypts. Currently, there exist numerous debates regarding the clinical significance of diagnosing FAC, which may or may not have clinical relevance as it is frequently detected in colorectal biopsies without any other microscopic abnormalities. The objective of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the available evidence concerning the clinical implications of FAC, both in the adult population (among five studies available in the scientific literature) and in the pediatric context (based on two available studies).

[Drug induced gastro-intestinal tract lesions: A pathologist point of view]

The number of drugs available to clinicians, especially targeted therapies, grows continuously. Some drugs are known to cause frequent digestive adverse effects, which may affect the gastro-intestinal tract in a diffuse or localized manner. Some treatments may leave relatively pathognomonic deposits, but histological lesions of iatrogenic origin are mostly non-specific. The diagnostic and etiological approach is often complex because of these non-specific aspects and also because (1) a single type of drug may cause different histological lesions, (2) different drugs may cause identical histological lesions, (3) the patient may receive different drugs, and (4) drug-induced lesions may mimic other pathological entities such as inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, or graft versus host disease. The diagnosis of iatrogenic gastrointestinal tract injury therefore requires close anatomic-clinical correlation. The iatrogenic origin can only be formally established if the symptomatology improves when the incriminating drug is stopped. This review aims to present the different histological patterns of gastrointestinal tract iatrogenic lesions, the potentially incriminate drugs, as well as the histological signs to look for in order to help the pathologist to distinguish an iatrogenic injury from another pathology of the gastrointestinal tract.

Mixed lymphocytic and collagenous inflammation of the entire gastrointestinal tract under therapy with serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors

Drug-induced injury to the gastrointestinal tract has gained growing significance in recent years, and the list of causative medications keeps expanding. Herein, we present the case of a 45-year-old female with major depressive disorder treated with two serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (venlafaxine and duloxetine). She developed nausea and weight loss. Endoscopic evaluation of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract rendered grossly normal mucosa in all segments. Histological examination, however, revealed lymphocytic esophagitis, collagenous gastritis, celiac disease-like intraepithelial lymphocytosis of the duodenum, and incomplete collagenous colitis. Gastrointestinal side effects of psychoactive drugs are largely underrecognized. This is the first report of a mixed lymphocytic and collagenous pattern of injury affecting esophagus, stomach, duodenum, and colon triggered by combined treatment with venlafaxine and duloxetine. In patients with unclear symptoms, obtaining biopsies from mucosa that is normal upon endoscopic inspection may render decisive clues for clinical management.

Gut inflammation induced by drugs: Can pathology help to differentiate from inflammatory bowel disease?

Drug‐induced mucosal injury (DIMI) in the gastrointestinal tract is important to recognise, partly because cessation of the culprit agent alone may result in resolution of symptoms. An ever‐growing list of medications, including newer immunotherapeutic agents and targeted therapies, can cause gastrointestinal inflammation of varying severity. However, the diagnosis of DIMI is challenging, as a single drug can induce a variety of histopathological patterns of injury including acute colitis, chronic colitis, microscopic colitis, apoptotic colopathy, and ischaemic‐type colitis. An additional consideration is the potential clinical, endoscopic and histological overlap of DIMI with gastrointestinal mucosal injury secondary to other entities such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We discuss DIMI of the gastrointestinal tract with an emphasis on histological patterns that mimic IBD, histological features which may distinguish the two entities, and the diagnostic role and limitations of the pathologist.

ECCO Topical Review on Clinicopathological Spectrum and Differential Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

INTRODUCTION

Many diseases can imitate inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] clinically and pathologically. This review outlines the differential diagnosis of IBD and discusses morphological pointers and ancillary techniques that assist with the distinction between IBD and its mimics.

METHODS

European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] Topical Reviews are the result of an expert consensus. For this review, ECCO announced an open call to its members and formed three working groups [WGs] to study clinical aspects, pathological considerations, and the value of ancillary techniques. All WGs performed a systematic literature search.

RESULTS

Each WG produced a draft text and drew up provisional Current Practice Position [CPP] statements that highlighted the most important conclusions. Discussions and a preliminary voting round took place, with subsequent revision of CPP statements and text and a further meeting to agree on final statements.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians and pathologists encounter a wide variety of mimics of IBD, including infection, drug-induced disease, vascular disorders, diverticular disease, diversion proctocolitis, radiation damage, and immune disorders. Reliable distinction requires a multidisciplinary approach.

Comprehensive Evaluation and Unique Morphologic Features of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) Enteropathy in the Terminal Ileum

Differentiating NSAID enteropathy from Crohn disease can be challenging on terminal ileum biopsy. It is important to distinguish these two entities for management. In this study, clinical, radiographic, endoscopic, and histologic features of 30 patients diagnosed with NSAID enteropathy and 30 patients diagnosed with Crohn disease on terminal ileal biopsy were compared. None of the patients in the NSAID cohort demonstrated significant changes on imaging performed prior to biopsy. Depending on disease severity, patients with Crohn disease showed imaging findings ranging from minimal changes to significant bowel wall and/or luminal changes. Endoscopically, erythema, erosions, and/or ulcers in the terminal ileum were observed in a majority of NSAID cases. Patients with active Crohn disease were noted to have erythema, ulcers, strictures, and/or visible inflammation throughout the distal ileum and colon. Histologically, at least 80% of cases in each cohort showed ulceration/erosion and cryptitis/crypt abscesses. The Crohn disease cohort had significantly higher degree of lymphoplasmacytic inflammation in the lamina propria compared to the NSAID cohort. In contrast, a significantly higher percentage of the NSAID cohort had gland/crypt atrophy. A decrease in number of Paneth cells was found in the NSAID cohort. Decreased lamina propria lymphoplasmacytic inflammation was the most specific and the presence of gland atrophy the most sensitive feature favoring NSAID enteropathy. In summary, the combination of gland/crypt/Paneth cell atrophy with decreased lamina propria lymphoplasmacytic inflammation can aid in differentiating NSAID enteropathy from Crohn disease in terminal ileal biopsies; however, correlation with clinical, radiographic, and endoscopic findings is still required.

Histopathology of Celiac Disease. Position Statements of the Italian Group of Gastrointestinal Pathologists (GIPAD-SIAPEC)

Celiac Disease (CeD) is an immune-mediated inflammatory disorder of the small intestine, affecting genetically susceptible individuals when exposed to gluten. Small intestinal biopsy interpretation has been the “gold standard” for celiac disease (CeD) for over 50 years. Despite today’s availability of sensitive and specific serological tests, the histopathological features from mucosal biopsy play a key role in diagnosing when CeD is suspected. Such a diagnostic approach requires a multidisciplinary team to optimize both tissue sampling and interpretation via the interaction between the pathologist and the gastroenterologist. Pathologists of the Italian Group of Gastrointestinal Pathology (GIPAD-SIAPEC), together with a member (TR) of the Italian Society of Technicians (AITIC) and an expert gastroenterologist (CC), provide position statements as a practical tool for reading and interpreting the report.

Moreover, a position statement was formulated about the recently described condition known as Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS). Within such a diagnostic setting, both the architectural abnormalities of the duodenal mucosa, namely glandular hyperplasia, and villous atrophy and the number of intraepithelial T-lymphocytes should be well highlighted. Ancillary tests such as anti-CD3 stain are useful for an accurate count of the intraepithelial T lymphocytes when CeD or NCGS is suspected. Moreover, anti-CD3 and anti-CD8 stains are recommended in patients not responding to the gluten-free diet (GFD) to confirm a diagnosis of Refractory Celiac Disease (RCeD). Diagnostic clues about the differential diagnosis of both CeD and RCeD have also been rendered.

Adverse Gastrointestinal Effects with Kayexalate or Kalimate: A Comprehensive Review

BACKGROUND

Patients with hyperkalemia are commonly treated with Kayexalate or Kalimate. Both drugs are associated with some fatal gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs).

AIM

To assess the clinical characteristics and outcomes of GI AEs induced by Kayexalate or Kalimate from published case reports.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of case reports of Kayexalate or Kalimate-induced GI AEs, from PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Clinical Key, and Google Scholar databases (1948 to March 31, 2020). We analyzed the clinical characteristics, GI AEs, and risk factors of enrolled patients.

RESULTS

We identified 41 published articles describing 135 cases of GI AEs induced by Kayexalate (103 cases) or Kalimate (32 cases). The mean age of all patients was 55.5 years. Most patients were male (54.8%). As high as 55.6% preparations were administered with sorbitol whereas 44.4% preparations had no sorbitol. The average time causing GI AEs was 19.8 days. Colon was the most commonly affected site (76.3%). Drug crystals were histopathologically proven in 95.5% of the patients. Meanwhile, mortality was reported in 20.7%.

CONCLUSION

Kayexalate or Kalimate, without or with sorbitol combination, may be related to fatal GI damage. Uremia, hypertension, and transplantation are predisposing factors. Clinicians should be careful in prescribing Kayexalate or Kalimate to patients.

Histopathologic Patterns of Colitis in Patients With Impaired Renal Function

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the histopathologic features of colitis in patients with impaired renal function.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 413 patients who underwent colonoscopic evaluation for colitis between 2011 and 2015. Patients were divided into four groups based on estimated glomerular filtrate rates. Patients with impaired renal function were compared to overall and age-matched patients with normal renal function.

RESULTS

Compared to a preponderance of inflammatory bowel disease (33%) and lymphocytic colitis (9.6%) in patients with normal renal function, ischemic colitis (58%) was the predominant histopathologic pattern in the patients with impaired renal function. Infectious colitis was the second most common pattern (20.8%), with Clostridium difficile and cytomegalovirus infections being more frequent. Medication-induced injury was the third most common pattern, with crystal-associated injury being the exclusive pattern found in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Colitis in patients with impaired renal function is etiologically distinct from that seen in patients with normal renal function.

Phenotype of histologically suspected drug-induced colitis; results of a comparative, retrospective cohort study

Background/aims: Drug-induced colitis (DiC) is a rarely reported form of colonopathy and data about the clinical and endoscopic characteristics are scarce. The aim was to investigate the phenotype of DiC. Methods: Patients in a retrospective case control study were assigned to either DiC or one of two age- and gender-matched control groups (non-inflammatory controls and inflammatory colitis from other causes) based on histopathological findings. Patients' basic characteristics, symptoms, biochemical results and endoscopic appearance were collected. Statistical analysis included ANOVA, the chi-squared test and two-tailed t-test. Results: A total of 211 patients with DiC were included (97 males, age 62.1 ± 16.1 years, BMI 25.9 ± 6.1 kg m^-2). In comparison to both control groups, DiC patients presented higher ASA and ECOG-scores and more particularly atherosclerotic comorbidities. The most abundant symptoms were abdominal pain (51.8%), diarrhoea (50.7%) and haematochezia (24.3%). The red blood cell count demarcated anaemia (12.7 ± 2.3 mg/dl) and C-reactive protein was slightly elevated (2.7 ± 5.2 mg/dl). The endoscopic features included erythema (46.9%), oedema (29.9%), erosions (29.9%) and ulcers (14.7%). The inflammation affected the rectum rarely (2.4%) but affected the rest of the colon without predilection in a segmental manner (p<.05). The severity of DiC was mostly mild (85.7%). Conclusions: The phenotype of DiC differs slightly from that of colitis from other causes. Taking the clinical features into account might help to confirm drug-induced aetiology once the pathologist has raised the suspicion.

Triggers of histologically suspected drug-induced colitis

BACKGROUND

Drug toxicity is a common and even serious problem in the gastrointestinal tract that is thought to be caused by a broad spectrum of agents. Although withdrawal of the causative agent would cure the disease knowledge is scarce and mostly derives from case reports and series.

AIM

To investigate potential triggers of drug-induced colitis (DiC).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, observational case control study. Patients were assigned to DiC or one of two age- and gender-matched control groups (non-inflammatory controls and inflammatory colitis of another cause) based on histopathological findings. Histopathology was reassessed in a subset of patients (28 DiC with atherosclerosis, DiC without atherosclerosis and ischaemic colitis each) for validation purposes. Medical history was collected from the electronic database and patient records. Statistical analysis included chi-squared test, t-test, logistic and multivariate regression models.

RESULTS

Drug-induced colitis was detected in 211 endoscopically sampled biopsy specimens of the colon mucosa (7% of all screened colonoscopic biopsy samples); a total of 633 patients were included equally matched throughout the three groups (291 males, mean age: 62.1 ± 16.1 years). In the univariate analysis, DiC was associated with diuretics, dihydropyridines, glycosides, ASS, platelet aggregation inhibitors, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), statins and fibrates, and with atherosclerosis, particularly coronary heart disease, and hyperlipoproteinaemia. Echocardiographic parameters did not show substantial differences. In the multivariate analysis only fibrates [odds ratio (OR) = 9.1], NSAIDs (OR = 6.7) and atherosclerosis (OR = 2.1) proved to be associated with DiC. Both DiC reassessment groups presented milder inflammation than ischaemic colitis. The DiC patients with atherosclerosis exhibited histological features from both DiC without atherosclerosis and ischaemic colitis.

CONCLUSION

Several drugs indicated for the treatment of cardiovascular and related diseases are associated with DiC. Atherosclerosis and microcirculatory disturbances seem to play an important pathogenetic role.

Ilececum: A Comprehensive Review

For gastrointestinal endoscopists, the ileocecum is the finishing line during colonoscopy and it is identified by three endoscopic landmarks: terminal ileum, ileocecal valve, and the appendiceal orifice. Although ileal intubation is recommended during routine screening colonoscopy, it is not required in most cases of screening colonoscopy. Ileal intubation is indicated in certain circumstances such as suspected inflammatory bowel disease and GI bleeding. There is much pathology that can be observed within the ileocecum. Careful and systematic examination should be stressed during GI endoscopic training and practice. In this review, the authors demonstrate its anatomy, endoscopic findings, and pathologies.

Eosinophilic colitis and colonic eosinophilia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Eosinophilic colitis is a rare condition, with a prevalence rate in the USA of 2-3/100 000 persons (0.003%), but diagnosed in 0.1% of biopsies in those colonoscoped for diarrhoea. Secondary colonic eosinophilia is more common and associated with systemic, colonic and infectious diseases. In this review, the latest advances in diagnosis, treatment and prognosis are summarized and discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

What constitutes a 'normal' count of eosinophils is poorly documented but there are recent studies that establish normal colonic eosinophil ranges as well as distinguishing histological and clinical findings in primary eosinophilic colitis and secondary colonic eosinophilia in children and adults. Primary eosinophilic colitis is rare, relatively straightforward to diagnose, but may be difficult to treat. Colonic eosinophilia may be overt in parasite infection and connective tissue disease. More subtle, secondary colonic eosinophilia is a useful biomarker for gastrointestinal diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease, colonic spirochaetosis and collagenous colitis, but the eosinophilia may more often be overlooked. A limited number of drugs are also known to cause left sided colonic eosinophilia such as clopidogrel, ibuprofen and oestroprogestinic agents.

SUMMARY

Advances in our understanding of primary eosinophilic colitis and secondary colonic eosinophilia is progressing and if present, colonic eosinophilia should point the clinician and pathologist to a list of differential diagnoses worth considering to direct optimal management.

The Differential Diagnosis of Acute Colitis: Clues to a Specific Diagnosis

This review describes a systematic approach to the interpretation of colonic biopsy specimens of patients with acute colitis. Five main histologic patterns are discussed: acute colitis, focal active colitis, pseudomembranous colitis, hemorrhagic colitis, and ischemic colitis. For each pattern, the most common etiologic associations and their differential diagnoses are presented. Strategies based on histologic analysis and clinical considerations to differentiate acute from chronic colitides are discussed.

Olmesartan-associated enteropathy

Olmesartan, an angiotensin-receptor blocker frequently prescribed for hypertension, has been commercially available since 2002. In 2012, olmesartan-associated enteropathy was described, and the Food and Drug Administration now requires a black-box warning for olmesartan regarding severe diarrhea. The disorder can be life-threatening and often requires hospitalization. We present three cases that represent different aspects of this disorder, as well as some unusual features.

The Impact of New Technologic and Molecular Advances in the Daily Practice of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Pathology

The practice of anatomic pathology, and of gastrointestinal pathology in particular, has been dramatically transformed in the past decade. In addition to the multitude of diseases, syndromes, and clinical entities encountered in daily clinical practice, the increasing integration of new technologic and molecular advances into the field of gastroenterology is occurring at a fast pace. Application of these advances has challenged pathologists to correlate newer methodologies with existing morphologic criteria, which in many instances still provide the gold standard for diagnosis. This review describes the impact of new technologic and molecular advances on the daily practice of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary pathology. We discuss new drugs that can affect the gastrointestinal tract and liver, new endoluminal techniques, new molecular tests that are often performed reflexively, new imaging techniques for evaluating hepatocellular carcinoma, and modified approaches to the gross and histologic assessment of tissues that have been exposed to neoadjuvant therapies.

Spectrum of Drug-induced Chronic Diarrhea

The evaluation of a patient with chronic diarrhea can be quite frustrating, as it is expensive and involves multiple diagnostic studies. Moreover, identification of a drug as a cause of chronic diarrhea is a challenge in patients taking multiple medications. The disease may either be associated with intestinal mucosal changes, mimicking diseases such as celiac disease, or purely functional, with no histopathologic change. Drug-induced diarrhea may or may not be associated with malabsorption of nutrients, and a clinical improvement may occur within days of discontinuation of the drug, or may take longer when associated with mucosal injury. Diarrhea in diabetics, often attributed to poor management and lack of control, may be due to oral hypoglycaemic agents. Chemotherapy can result in diffuse or segmental colitis, whereas olmesartan and a few other medications infrequently induce a disease that mimics celiac disease, but is not associated with gluten intolerance. In short, increased awareness of a drug, as a cause for diarrhea and a clear understanding of the clinical manifestations will help clinicians to solve this challenging problem. This article aims to review drug-induced diarrhea to (a) understand known pathophysiological mechanisms; (b) assess the risk associated with frequently prescribed medications, and discuss the pathogenesis; and

Outcome of emergency surgery for severe neuroleptic-induced colitis: results of a prospective cohort

AIM

The study evaluated the outcome of severe acute antipsychotic (neuroleptic) drug related colitis requiring emergency surgery.

METHOD

From 2009 to 2014, 20 patients underwent emergency surgery for acute and severe neuroleptic-related ischaemic colitis. Neuroleptic-induced colitis was defined as another cause besides inflammatory, infectious or ischaemic colitis with a relationship to treatment by antipsychotic drugs.

RESULTS

The main drugs involved were cyamemazine (n = 9, 45%), loxapine (n = 5, 25%), haloperidol (n = 4, 20%) and alimemazine (n = 4, 20%). Most (n = 14, 70%) patients presented with haemodynamic instability requiring massive resuscitation and vasopressive drugs. CT signs of digestive impairment were found in 13 (65%) patients having emergency surgery. The lesions were pancolonic in 40%; transparietal necrosis was found in 45% and 15% had colonic perforation. Twelve (60%) patients had total or subtotal colectomy and eight (40%) a segmental colectomy with colostomy or ileostomy in all cases. The postoperative mortality was 15% and morbidity was 70%, necessitating surgical reintervention in two (10%) patients. Of the 17 surviving patients, 11 (64.7%) had restoration of intestinal continuity after a median delay of 103 days, with a postoperative morbidity rate of 36.3%. In the intent-to-treat population, the permanent stoma rate was 30%.

CONCLUSION

The morbidity and mortality of surgery for neuroleptic-drug-induced colitis is higher than for colitis due to other causes. A better knowledge of this condition should lead to early diagnosis.

Colitis during new direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) therapy with sofosbuvir, simeprevir and ribavirin for genotype 1b hepatitis C

Since 2014 several direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have been made available, allowing interferon-free antiviral treatments with high sustained virological response rates. Side effects are, however, a real challenge during treatment. Sarkar et al. recently published a case of colitis following initiation of sofosbuvir and simeprevir for genotype 1 hepatitis C. We report the case of a patient with no prior history of inflammatory bowel disease, who developed significant bloody diarrhea within 3 weeks of sofosbuvir/simeprevir/ribavirin initiation. Colonoscopy and biopsy suggested a drug-induced colitis.

Colitis Following Initiation of Sofosbuvir and Simeprevir for Genotype 1 Hepatitis C

Sofosbuvir and simeprevir are used for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (HCV) genotype 1. Both drugs have been well-tolerated, with diarrhea noted in 6% cases with sofosbuvir, 16% with sofosbuvir plus simeprevir, and 0% with simeprevir. No prior reports exist of colitis secondary to either drug or their combination. We report a patient with no prior history of inflammatory bowel disease who developed significant bloody diarrhea within 2 weeks of sofosbuvir/simeprevir initiation. Colonoscopy and biopsy confirmed pancolitis, which responded to mesalamine and completion of sofosbuvir/simeprevir.