Immunohistochemical detection of theBRAFV600E mutant protein in colorectal cancers in Taiwan is highly concordant with the molecular test

BRAF V600E Mutation Lacks Association with Poorer Clinical Prognosis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Previous literatures showed wide range of prevalence of BRAF V600E in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). The correlation of BRAF V600E mutation with aggressive tumor characteristics and poor prognosis is controversial. The present study was designed to evaluate the association between BRAF V600E mutation with clinicopathological factors and tumor recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of 672 patients who underwent thyroid surgery for PTC during 2013 and 2018. The prevalence of the BRAF V600E mutation was studied. Its correlation with clinicopathologic characteristics and aggressive features, including macroscopic extrathyroidal extension, lymph node metastasis, and distant metastasis, were analyzed with Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

A total of 672 patients who underwent surgical treatment for PTC were included in this study with a mean age of 49.7 (± 13.2) years; 76.8% of the patients were detected with BRAF V600E mutation. Mean tumor size was 1.30 (± 1.07) cm. A significant association was demonstrated between negative BRAF V600E and larger primary tumor size, distant metastasis, and advanced staging (p < 0.05), whereas there was no significant association with age, sex, lymph node metastasis, extrathyroidal extension, and multicentricity. Kaplan-Meier curve showed similar disease-free survival rate between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Negative BRAF V600E tumors show more aggressive behavior with a higher risk of developing distant metastasis in patients with PTC. The usefulness of BRAF in predicting the prognosis of PTC remains questionable. Further molecular analysis should be conducted for contribution to aggressive tumor phenotype.

BRAFV600E immunohistochemistry can reliably substitute BRAF molecular testing in the Lynch syndrome screening algorithm in colorectal cancer

AIMS

The Lynch syndrome (LS) screening algorithm requires BRAF testing as a fundamental step to distinguish sporadic from LS-associated colorectal carcinomas (CRC). BRAF testing by immunohistochemistry (IHC) has shown variable results in the literature. Our aim was to analyse concordance between BRAFV600E IHC and BRAF molecular analysis in a large, mono-institutional CRC whole-slide, case series with laboratory validation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

MisMatch repair (MMR) protein (hMLH1, hPMS2, hMSH2, and hMSH6) and BRAFV600E IHC were performed on all unselected cases of surgically resected CRCs (2018-2023). An in-house validation study for BRAFV600E IHC was performed in order to obtain optimal IHC stains. BRAFVV600E IHC was considered negative (score 0), positive (scores 2-3), and equivocal (score 1). Interobserver differences in BRAFV600E IHC scoring were noted in the first 150 cases prospectively collected. Nine-hundred and ninety CRCs cases (830 proficient (p)MMR/160 deficient (d)MMR) were included and all cases performed BRAFV600E IHC (BRAFV600E IHC-positive 13.5% of all series; 66.3% dMMR cases; 3.4% pMMR cases), while 333 also went to BRAF mutation analysis. Optimal agreement in IHC scoring between pathologists (P < 0.0001) was seen; concordance between BRAFV600E IHC and BRAF molecular analysis was extremely high (sensitivity 99.1%, specificity 99.5%; PPV 99.1%, and NPV 99.5%). Discordant cases were reevaluated; 1 score 3 + IHC/wildtype case was an interpretation error and one score 0 IHC/mutated case was related to heterogenous BRAFV600E IHC expression. Among the 12 IHC-equivocal score 1+ cases (which require BRAF molecular analysis), three were BRAF-mutated and nine BRAF-wildtype.

CONCLUSION

BRAFV600E IHC can be used as a reliable surrogate of molecular testing after stringent in-house validation.

A Shift in Molecular Drivers of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Following the 2017 World Health Organization Classification: Characterization of 554 Consecutive Tumors With Emphasis on BRAF-Negative Cases

Most studies for comprehensive molecular profiling of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) have been performed before the 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, in which the diagnostic criteria of follicular variants of PTC have been modified and noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features has been introduced. This study aims to investigate the shift in the incidence of BRAF V600E mutations in PTCs following the 2017 WHO classification and to further characterize the histologic subtypes and molecular drivers in BRAF-negative cases. The study cohort consisted of 554 consecutive PTCs larger than 0.5 cm between January 2019 and May 2022. Immunohistochemistry for BRAF VE1 was performed for all cases. Compared with a historical cohort of 509 PTCs from November 2013 to April 2018, the incidence of BRAF V600E mutations was significantly higher in the study cohort (86.8% vs 78.8%, P = .0006). Targeted RNA-based next-generation sequencing using a FusionPlex Pan Solid Tumor v2 panel (ArcherDX) was performed for BRAF-negative PTCs from the study cohort. Eight cribriform-morular thyroid carcinomas and 3 cases with suboptimal RNA quality were excluded from next-generation sequencing. A total of 62 BRAF-negative PTCs were successfully sequenced, including 19 classic follicular predominant PTCs, 16 classic PTCs, 14 infiltrative follicular PTCs, 7 encapsulated follicular PTCs, 3 diffuse sclerosing PTCs, 1 tall cell PTC, 1 solid PTC, and 1 diffuse follicular PTC. Among them, RET fusions were identified in 25 cases, NTRK3 fusions in 13 cases, BRAF fusions in 5 cases including a novel TNS1::BRAF fusion, NRAS Q61R mutations in 3 cases, KRAS Q61K mutations in 2 cases, NTRK1 fusions in 2 cases, an ALK fusion in 1 case, an FGFR1 fusion in 1 case, and an HRAS Q61R mutation in 1 case. No genetic variants, from our commercially employed assay, were detected in the remaining 9 cases. In summary, the incidence of BRAF V600E mutations in PTCs significantly increased from 78.8% to 86.8% in our post-2017 WHO classification cohort. RAS mutations accounted for only 1.1% of the cases. Driver gene fusions were identified in 8.5% of PTCs and were clinically relevant given the emerging targeted kinase inhibitor therapy. Of the 1.6% of cases for which no driver alteration was detected, the specificity of drivers tested and tumor classification require further investigation.

Prognostic Value of BRAF, Programmed Cell Death 1 (PD1), and PD Ligand 1 (PDL1) Protein Expression in Colon Adenocarcinoma

Patients with colorectal cancer in different stages show variable outcomes/therapeutic responses due to their distinct tumoral biomarkers and biological features. In this sense, this study aimed to explore the prognostic utility of BRAF, programmed death-1 (PD1), and its ligand (PDL1) protein signatures in colon adenocarcinoma. The selected protein markers were explored in 64 archived primary colon adenocarcinomas in relation to clinicopathological features. BRAF overexpression was found in 39% of the cases and was significantly associated with grade 3, N1, advanced Dukes stage, presence of relapse, and shorter overall survival (OS). PD1 expression in the infiltrating immune cells (IICs) exhibited significant association with T2/T3, N0/M0, early Dukes stage, and absence of relapse. PDL1 expression in IICs is significantly associated with advanced nodal stage/distant metastasis, advanced Dukes stage, and shorter OS. Meanwhile, PDL1 expression in neoplastic cells (NC) was associated with the advanced lymph node/Dukes stage. A positive combined expression pattern of PDL1 in NC/IICs was associated with poor prognostic indices. Tumor PDL1 expression can be an independent predictor of OS and DFS. The multivariate analyses revealed that short OS was independently associated with the RT side location of the tumor, PD1 expression in stromal IICs, and PDL1 expression in NC. In conclusion, overexpression of BRAF in colon adenocarcinoma is considered a poor prognostic pathological marker. In addition, PDL1 expression in NC is considered an independent prognostic factor for DFS/OS. Combined immunohistochemical assessment for BRAF and PD1/PDL1 protein expressions in colon adenocarcinoma might be beneficial for selecting patients for future targeted therapy.

The Molecular Pathology of Odontogenic Tumors: Expanding the Spectrum of MAPK Pathway Driven Tumors

Odontogenic tumors comprise a heterogeneous group of lesions that arise from the odontogenic apparatus and their remnants. Although the etiopathogenesis of most odontogenic tumors remains unclear, there have been some advances, recently, in the understanding of the genetic basis of specific odontogenic tumors. The mitogen-activated protein kinases/extracellular signal-regulated kinases (MAPK/ERK) pathway is intimately involved in the regulation of important cellular functions, and it is commonly deregulated in several human neoplasms. Molecular analysis performed by different techniques, including direct sequencing, next-generation sequencing, and allele-specific qPCR, have uncovered mutations in genes related to the oncogenic MAPK/ERK signaling pathway in odontogenic tumors. Genetic mutations in this pathway genes have been reported in epithelial and mixed odontogenic tumors, in addition to odontogenic carcinomas and sarcomas. Notably, B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) and KRAS proto-oncogene GTPase (KRAS) pathogenic mutations have been reported in a high proportion of ameloblastomas and adenomatoid odontogenic tumors, respectively. In line with the reports about other neoplasms that harbor a malignant counterpart, the frequency of BRAF p.V600E mutation is higher in ameloblastoma (64% in conventional, 81% in unicystic, and 63% in peripheral) than in ameloblastic carcinoma (35%). The objective of this study was to review MAPK/ERK genetic mutations in benign and malignant odontogenic tumors. Additionally, such genetic alterations were discussed in the context of tumorigenesis, clinical behavior, classification, and future perspectives regarding therapeutic approaches.

NTRK-rearranged papillary thyroid carcinoma demonstrates frequent subtle nuclear features and indeterminate cytologic diagnoses

BACKGROUND

The studies on the cytomorphologic features of NTRK-rearranged papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) are limited and some reported characteristics, such as frequent indeterminate diagnoses and presence of fibrotic fragments, are inconsistent in literature.

METHODS

NTRK gene rearrangements were detected in thyroidectomy specimens of PTC by either fluorescence in situ hybridization or next-generation sequencing. All the cytologic slides of NTRK-rearranged PTC were reviewed to evaluate the cytomorphologic features. The preoperative cytologic diagnoses of NTRK-rearranged PTC were compared with those of NTRK/BRAF wild-type and BRAF^V600E -positive PTC.

RESULTS

Fourteen PTC cases were identified to harbor NTRK gene rearrangements. Most of them showed a mixed architectural pattern of cell fragments (n = 13, 92.9%) and microfollicles (n = 9, 64.3%) with relatively rare papillary structures (n = 4, 28.6%). Nuclear grooving was frequently present (n = 11, 78.6%) but was mostly subtle and limited. Seven cases (50.0%) showed rounded nuclei without discernible nuclear elongation, and only 3 (21.4%) cases presented with nuclear pseudoinclusions. Among these cases, 7 (50.0%) were diagnosed as The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBS) category III, 2 (14.3%) were diagnosed as TBS IV, and 5 (35.7%) were diagnosed as TBS V. The rate of TBS III-IV diagnoses for NTRK-rearranged PTCs was significantly higher (64.3%) than that for the 25 consecutive NTRK/BRAF wild-type PTCs (20.0%, P = .013) and the 70 consecutive BRAF^V600E -positive PTCs (7.1%, P < .001) as selected.

CONCLUSIONS

NTRK-rearranged PTC demonstrated intermediate nuclear features, such as subtle nuclear grooving, infrequent nuclear elongation, and rare pseudoinclusions, resulting in a significantly higher rate of TBS III-IV diagnoses compared to PTC with other molecular alterations.

Immunohistochemistry Critical Assay Performance Controls (ICAPC) Reduce Interobserver Variability in the Interpretation of BRAFV600E Immunohistochemistry

The utility of prognostic and predictive immunohistochemistry biomarkers in the context of cancer is plagued by inconsistent interpretation of results which can lead to poor rates of adoption or inappropriate use of novel therapeutic strategies. To monitor immunohistochemistry assay performance, a new on-slide control motif, Immunohistochemistry Critical Assay Performance Controls (ICAPC) was developed. We hypothesized that the use of these controls by the diagnosing pathologist to interpret BRAFV600E would result in reduced interobserver and intraobserver interpretation errors. A cross-sectional, sequentially obtained sample of surgical pathology cases stained for BRAFV600E was assembled from a single hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia. Half of the cases had normal on-slide controls and the remainder with ICAPC. Results from 6 independent and blinded readers were compared with each other and to the gold-standard pathologic diagnosis with the goal of demonstrating superior interrater agreement with ICAPC relative to standard on-slide controls. Cohen's κ was used to compute pair-wise reader agreements, whereas Fleiss' κ was used to compare to the gold standard. The implementation of ICAPC resulted in statistically significant improvements in the interobserver agreement of BRAF mutation status ascertained by BRAFV600E immunohistochemistry. Half of the readers demonstrated significant improvements in agreement with the gold-standard diagnosis with the addition of ICAPC. Across all readers, the mean increase in κ was 0.14 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.01-0.28 (P=0.04). This study demonstrates that the addition of ICAPC serves to significantly reduce interobserver variability in the assessment of BRAFV600E immunohistochemistry. As such, we recommend that this approach should be used as part of a comprehensive quality management strategy in the setting of histopathology.

Detection of NTRK1/3 Rearrangements in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Using Immunohistochemistry, Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization, and Next-Generation Sequencing

NTRK1/3 rearrangements have been reported in 2.3-3.4% of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and are regarded as potential therapeutic targets. Recently, the application of immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect NTRK rearrangements has been widely discussed. The current study aimed to characterize the clinicopathological features of PTC with NTRK1/3 fusions, to examine the utility of pan-TRK IHC, and to compare IHC with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and next-generation sequencing (NGS). In a cohort of 525 consecutive PTC cases, 60 BRAF^V600E-negative cases underwent complete analyses of FISH, and 12 (2.3%) cases with NTRK1/3 break-apart were found. A novel ERC1-NTRK3 fusion was identified by NGS in one case. Pathological features of non-infiltrative tumor border, clear cell change, and reduced nuclear elongation and irregularity were significantly more common in NTRK1/3-rearranged PTC when compared with 48 BRAF^V600E-negative non-NTRK1/3 PTC cases. In whole tissue sections, pan-TRK IHC was positive in 3/7 (42.9%) cases with an ETV6-NTRK3 rearrangement including 2 cases with low percentage of stained tumor cells, 2/3 (66.7%) with non-ETV6 NTRK3 rearrangements, and 2/2 (100%) with NTRK1 rearrangements. All FISH-negative cases were negative for pan-TRK in tissue microarray sections. As a result, pan-TRK IHC showed a sensitivity of 58.3% and specificity of 100% for NTRK1/3 rearrangements in BRAF^V600E-negative PTC. In conclusion, NTRK1/3-rearranged PTC shared some unique morphologic features. Pan-TRK IHC showed high specificity and moderate sensitivity for NTRK1/3-rearranged PTC and should be interpreted with caution due to staining heterogeneity. Based on the above findings, we propose an algorithm integrating morphology, IHC, and molecular testing to detect NTRK1/3 rearrangements in PTC.

BRAF V600E mutation-specific immunohistochemical analysis in ameloblastomas: a 44-patient cohort study from a single institution

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to investigate the presence and prevalence of BRAF V600E mutation in ameloblastomas using anti-BRAF V600E monoclonal antibody (VE1 clone) and to identify any clinicopathologic correlation with BRAF V600E mutation in ameloblastoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The pathology files of the Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Lagos State University College of Medicine, Lagos, Nigeria, were searched for the diagnosis of ameloblastoma from 2016 to 2020. Archived non-decalcified formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue underwent immunohistochemistry using anti-BRAF V600E antibody at the University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Clinicopathologic data such as age at diagnosis, gender, jaw bone involved (mandible or maxilla), tumor location (anterior or posterior) and histologic subtype were collected. The clinicopathologic parameters were analyzed using Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test according to the BRAF status.

RESULTS

Forty-four cases of ameloblastoma were retrieved. The male to female ratio was 1.32:1. The average age of patients at diagnosis was 33.3 years. Thirty-nine cases were located in the mandible and 5 cases in the maxilla. Only cases in the mandible were positive for anti-BRAF V600E antibody (n = 15/39; 38.5%). There was a significant correlation between BRAF V600E expression in mandibular tumors and histologic subtype (p = 0.02); however, no significance was observed for gender, age and tumor location.

CONCLUSION

BRAF V600E mutation preferentially occurs in mandibular ameloblastomas, especially in non-plexiform ameloblastomas. These patients may benefit therapeutically from the use of BRAF inhibitors.

Clinicopathological Significance of BRAFV600E Mutation in Colorectal Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Background and Aims: Numerous studies have identified BRAF^V600E mutation as a predictive factor of anti-EGFR antibodies in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the association between BRAF^V600E mutation and clinicopathological features remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to conduct an updated and comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the above issues. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and PMC database examining the association between BRAF^V600E mutation and clinicopathological features in CRC patients. Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval were used to estimate the effects of BRAF^V600E mutation on each clinicopathological parameter with fixed-effect model or random-effect model. Results: Sixty-one studies published, including 32407 CRC patients from multiple countries, were included in the meta-analysis. The overall BRAF^V600E mutation rate was 11.38%, and BRAF^V600E mutation was positively related to high disease stage (OR=0.81; 95% CI=0.72-0.92; P=0.001), high T stage (OR=0.51; 95% CI=0.40-0.65; P<0.00001), proximal colon (OR=4.76; 95% CI=3.81-5.96; P<0.00001) or right colon (OR=5.15; 95% CI=4.35-6.10, P<0.00001) tumor location, poor tumor differentiation (OR=0.27; 95% CI=0.21-0.34; P<0.00001), mucinous histology (OR=2.97; 95% CI=2.37-3.72; P<0.00001), K-ras-wild type (OR=0.04; 95% CI=0.02-0.07; P<0.00001), TP53-wild type (OR=0.50; 95% CI=0.31-0.78; P=0.003), deficient DNA mismatch repair (OR=2.93; 95% CI=1.78-4.82; P<0.00001), high microsatellite instability (OR=11.15; 95% CI=8.51-14.61; P<0.00001) and high CpG island methylator phenotype (OR=0.04; 95% CI=0.03-0.08; P<0.00001). Conclusions: Our updated meta-analysis demonstrated that BRAF^V600E mutation was related to poor prognosis of CRC and associated with the distinct molecular phenotypes.

Mutations of key driver genes in colorectal cancer progression and metastasis

The association between mutations of key driver genes and colorectal cancer (CRC) metastasis has been investigated by many studies. However, the results of these studies have been contradictory. Here, we perform a comprehensive analysis to screen key driver genes from the TCGA database and validate the roles of these mutations in CRC metastasis. Using bioinformatics analysis, we identified six key driver genes, namely APC, KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, SMAD4 and p53. Through a systematic search, 120 articles published by November 30, 2017, were included, which all showed roles for these gene mutations in CRC metastasis. A meta-analysis showed that KRAS mutations (combined OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05-1.33) and p53 mutations (combined OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.23-1.80) were associated with CRC metastasis, including lymphatic and distant metastases. Moreover, CRC patients with a KRAS mutation (combined OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.13-1.47), p53 mutation (combined OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.06-1.72) or SMAD4 mutation (combined OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.41-2.95) were at a higher risk of distant metastasis. Subgroup analysis stratified by ethnic populations indicated that the BRAF mutation was related to CRC metastasis (combined OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.18-1.71) and distant metastasis (combined OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.20-1.91) in an Asian population. No significant association was found between mutations of APC or PIK3CA and CRC metastasis. In conclusion, mutations of KRAS, p53, SMAD4 and BRAF play significant roles in CRC metastasis and may be both potential biomarkers of CRC metastasis as well as therapeutic targets.

Immunohistochemistry with Anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) Mouse Monoclonal Antibody is a Sensitive Method for Detection of the BRAF V600E Mutation in Colon Cancer: Evaluation of 120 Cases with and without KRAS Mutation and Literature Review

The major aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody in colorectal tumors with and without KRAS mutation. KRAS and BRAF are two major oncogenic drivers of colorectal cancer (CRC) that have been frequently described as mutually exclusive, thus the BRAF V600E mutation is not expected to be present in the cases with KRAS mutation. In addition, a review of 25 studies comparing immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody with BRAF V600E molecular testing in 4041 patient samples was included. One-hundred and twenty cases with/without KRAS or BRAF mutations were acquired. The tissue were immunostained with anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody with OptiView DAB IHC detection kit. The KRAS mutated cases with equivocal immunostaining were further evaluated by Sanger sequencing for BRAF V600E mutation. Thirty cases with BRAF V600E mutation showed unequivocal, diffuse, uniform, positive cytoplasmic staining and 30 cases with wild-type KRAS and BRAF showed negative staining with anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody. Out of 60 cases with KRAS mutation, 56 cases (93.3%) were negative for BRAF V600E mutation by IHC. Four cases showed weak, equivocal, heterogeneous, cytoplasmic staining along with nuclear staining in 25-90% of tumor cells. These cases were confirmed to be negative for BRAF V600E mutation by Sanger sequencing. Overall, IHC with anti-BRAF V600E (VE1) antibody using recommended protocol with OptiView detection is optimal for detection of BRAF V600E mutation in CRC. Our data are consistent with previous reports indicating that KRAS and BRAF V600E mutation are mutually exclusive.

Thyroid transcription factor-1 distinguishes subependymal giant cell astrocytoma from its mimics and supports its cell origin from the progenitor cells in the medial ganglionic eminence

Subependymal giant cell astrocytoma is a benign brain tumor mostly associated with tuberous sclerosis complex. However, it may be misinterpreted as other high-grade brain tumors due to the presence of large tumor cells with conspicuous pleomorphism and occasional atypical features, such as tumor necrosis and endothelial proliferation. In this study, we first investigated thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) expression in a large series of subependymal giant cell astrocytomas and other histologic and locational mimics to validate the diagnostic utility of this marker. We then examined TTF-1 expression in non-neoplastic brain tissue to determine the cell origin of subependymal giant cell astrocytoma. Twenty-four subependymal giant cell astrocytoma specimens were subjected to tissue microarray construction. For comparison, a selection of tumors, including histologic mimics (21 gemistocytic astrocytomas and 24 gangliogliomas), tumors predominantly occurring at the ventricular system (50 ependymomas, 19 neurocytomas, and 7 subependymomas), and 134 astrocytomas (3 pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas, 45 diffuse astrocytomas, 46 anaplastic astrocytomas, and 40 glioblastomas) were used. Immunohistochemical stain for TTF-1 was positive in all 24 subependymal giant cell astrocytomas, whereas negative in all astrocytomas, gangliogliomas, ependymomas, and subependymomas. Neurocytomas were positive for TTF-1 in 4/19 (21%) of cases using clone 8G7G3/1 and in 9/19 (47%) of cases using clone SPT24. In the three fetal brains that we examined, TTF-1 expression was seen in the medial ganglionic eminence, a transient fetal structure between the caudate nucleus and the thalami. There was no BRAF^V600E mutation identified by direct sequencing in the 20 subependymal giant cell astrocytomas that we studied. In conclusion, TTF-1 is a useful marker in distinguishing subependymal giant cell astrocytoma from its mimics. Expression of TTF-1 in the fetal medial ganglionic eminence indicates that subependymal giant cell astrocytoma may originate from the progenitor cells in this region.

BRAFV600E mutation in the diagnosis of unicystic ameloblastoma

BACKGROUND

Unicystic ameloblastoma, an odontogenic neoplasm, presents clinical and radiographic similarities with dentigerous and radicular cysts, non-neoplastic lesions. It is not always possible to reach a final diagnosis with the incisional biopsy, leading to inappropriate treatment. The BRAFV600E activating mutation has been reported in a high proportion of ameloblastomas. The purpose of the study was to assess the utility of the detection of the BRAFV600E mutation in the differential diagnosis of unicystic ameloblastoma with dentigerous and radicular cysts.

METHODS

Twenty-six archival samples were included, comprising eight unicystic ameloblastomas (UAs), nine dentigerous and nine radicular cysts. The mutation was assessed in all samples by anti-BRAFV600E (clone VE1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) and by TaqMan mutation detection qPCR assay. Sanger sequencing was further carried out when samples showed conflicting results in the IHC and qPCR.

RESULTS

Although all UAs (8/8) showed positive uniform BRAFV600E staining along the epithelial lining length, the mutation was not confirmed by qPCR and Sanger sequencing in three samples. Positive staining for the BRAFV600E protein was observed in one dentigerous cyst, but it was not confirmed by the molecular methods. Furthermore, 2/9 dentigerous cysts and 2/9 radicular cysts showed non-specific immunostaining of the epithelium or plasma cells. None of the dentigerous or radicular cysts cases presented the BRAFV600E mutation in the qPCR assay.

CONCLUSIONS

The BRAFV600E antibody (clone VE1) IHC may show non-specific staining, but molecular assays may be useful for the diagnosis of unicystic ameloblastoma, in conjunction with clinical, radiological and histopathological features.