Immunohistochemistry with a pan-TRK antibody distinguishes secretory carcinoma of the salivary gland from acinic cell carcinoma

PON3::LCN1 and HTN3::MSANTD3 Gene Fusions With NR4A3/NR4A2 Expression in Salivary Acinic Cell Carcinoma

Acinic cell carcinoma of the salivary gland (AciCC) is a low-grade carcinoma characterized by the overexpression of the transcription factor nuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 3 (NR4A3). AciCC has been the subject of a few molecular research projects. This study delves into AciCC's molecular landscape to identify additional alterations and explore their clinical implications. RNA sequencing and immunohistochemical staining for markers NR4A3/NR4A2, DOG-1, S100, and mammaglobin were utilized on 41 AciCCs and 11 secretory carcinoma (SC) samples. NR4A3 was evident in 35 AciCCs, while the residual 6 were NR4A3-negative and NR4A2-positive; SC samples were consistently NR4A3-negative. A novel fusion, PON3 exon 1- LCN1 exon 5, was detected in 9/41 (21.9%) AciCCs, exhibiting a classical histologic pattern with serous cell components growing in solid sheets alongside the intercalated duct-like component. Clinical follow-up of 39 patients over a median of 59 months revealed diverse prognostic outcomes: 34 patients exhibited no disease evidence, whereas the remaining 5 experienced poorer prognosis, involving local recurrence, lymph node, and distant metastasis, and disease-associated death, 4 of which harbored the PON3::LCN1 fusion. In addition, the HTN3::MSANTD3 fusion was recurrently identified in 7/41 AciCC cases. SC patients lacked both fusions. Immunohistochemistry uncovered differential expression of DOG-1, S100, and mammaglobin across samples, providing nuanced insights into their roles in AciCC. This study accentuates PON3::LCN1 and HTN3::MSANTD3 fusions as recurrent molecular events in AciCC, offering potential diagnostic and prognostic utility and propelling further research into targeted therapeutic strategies.

Oncocytoid Salivary Tumors: Differential Diagnosis and Utility of Newly Described Immunohistochemistry

BACKGROUND

Oncocytoid salivary tumors include several entities such as oncocytoma, Warthin tumor, secretory carcinoma (SC), salivary duct carcinoma (SDC), acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC), oncocytic mucoepidermoid carcinoma (OMEC), intraductal carcinoma, and epithelial myoepithelial carcinoma (EMC). This review investigates the differential diagnosis of oncocytoid salivary tumors and explore the role of newly described immunostains as valuable tools for their diagnosing and potentially guiding treatment options.

METHODS

We assess the utility of incorporating new immunohistochemical markers in routine practice to aid in diagnosing oncocytoid salivary tumors and potentially provide treatment options.

RESULTS

In SDC, AR and Her2 immunostains are utilized as diagnostic tools and biomarkers for selecting patients who might benefit from Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and HER2-targeted therapy. Furthermore, nuclear Pan-Trk immunostaining can aid in diagnosing SC. Additionally, NR4A3 immunostaining has been shown high sensitivity and specificity in identifying AciCC in both surgical and cytologic specimens. Similarly, RAS Q61R mutant-specific immunostaining, detected in EMC, may offer a cost-effective diagnostic marker for this tumor. Although further studies are required to evaluate the role of BSND, this marker has been reported to be positive in Warthin tumor and oncocytoma, aiding in differentiating them from other oncocytoid tumors, particularly OMEC. In addition, BRAFV600E mutant-specific immunostaining can serve as a diagnostic and potentially therapeutic marker for oncocytic intraductal carcinoma in mutation positive cases.

CONCLUSION

Oncocytoid salivary tumors may have overlapping morphologies, posing diagnostic challenges for pathologists. Recently described immunohistochemical markers may offer valuable tools for diagnosing and potentially guiding treatment options for these tumors.

Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry in gynaecological mesenchymal tumours: diagnostic implications and pitfalls

AIMS

NTRK-rearranged sarcomas of the female genital tract mainly occur in the uterus (more commonly cervix than corpus) and are characterized by a "fibrosarcoma-like" morphology and NTRK gene rearrangements. These neoplasms may exhibit histological overlap with other entities and can present diagnostic difficulties without molecular confirmation. Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry was developed to identify tumours harbouring NTRK rearrangements. The aim of this study was to characterize pan-TRK immunohistochemical expression in a large cohort of gynaecological mesenchymal neoplasms and investigate the utility of pan-TRK immunohistochemistry to distinguish NTRK-rearranged sarcoma from its mimics.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 473 gynaecological mesenchymal tumours (461 without known NTRK fusions and 12 NTRK-rearranged sarcomas) were selected. Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (EPR17341, Abcam) was performed on whole tissue sections and tissue microarrays. Molecular interrogation of pan-TRK positive tumours was performed by RNA sequencing or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Of the 12 NTRK-rearranged sarcomas, 11 (92%) exhibited diffuse (≥70%) cytoplasmic pan-TRK staining with moderate/marked intensity, while the other was negative. Eleven (2.4%) additional tumours also exhibited pan-TRK immunohistochemical expression: three low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, seven high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, and an undifferentiated uterine sarcoma. Molecular confirmation of the absence of NTRK rearrangements was possible in nine of these tumours. Of these nine neoplasms, seven exhibited focal/multifocal (<70%) pan-TRK cytoplasmic staining with weak/moderate intensity.

CONCLUSION

Even though pan-TRK immunohistochemical expression is not entirely sensitive or specific for NTRK-rearranged sarcomas, these neoplasms tend to exhibit diffuse staining of moderate/strong intensity, unlike its mimics. Pan-TRK should be performed in monomorphic uterine (corpus and cervix) spindle cell neoplasms that are negative for smooth muscle markers and hormone receptors and positive for CD34 and/ or S100. Ultimately, the diagnosis requires molecular confirmation.

Updated Salivary Gland Immunohistochemistry: A Review

CONTEXT.—

Salivary gland neoplasms are rare lesions in the head and neck (H&N) pathology realm. There are more than 20 malignant and 15 benign salivary gland neoplasms in the 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification of H&N tumors. These neoplasms consist of heterogeneous groups of uncommon diseases that make diagnosis and treatment challenging for the clinical team. Using an algorithmic immunohistochemical approach-defined tumor origin and type has proven to be effective and advantageous. Immunohistochemistry may be used as sort of a "diagnostic looking glass," not as a positive or negative type tool, but as an indispensable complement to a hematoxylin-eosin morphologic pattern-based approach. Furthermore, the understanding of the novel discoveries of the salivary gland gene fusions and the molecular aspects of these tumors makes the process easier and improve the diagnosis as well as treatment aspects. This review reflects our experience with more recent diagnostic antibodies, which include MYB RNA, Pan-TRK, PLAG1, LEF1, and NR4A3. Each of these is linked with a specific type of neoplasm; for example, gene fusions involving the PLAG1 and HMGA2 oncogenes are specific for benign pleomorphic adenomas, and MYB is associated with adenoid cystic carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE.—

To review these more recent antibodies, which highly enhance salivary gland neoplasm diagnosis.

DATA SOURCES.—

The study sources involved literature PubMed searches, including multiple review articles, case reports, selected book chapters, and Geisinger Medical Center cases.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Salivary gland tumors are a rare, varied group of lesions in H&N pathology. We need to have continuous readings and revisions of the molecular consequences of these fusion oncoproteins and their subsequent targets, which will eventually lead to the identification of novel driver genes in salivary gland neoplasms.

Nuclear staining for pan-Trk by immunohistochemistry is highly specific for secretory carcinoma of breast: pan-Trk in various subtypes of breast carcinoma

AIMS

Secretory carcinoma of breast (SCB) typically harbours ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion. Pan-Trk immunohistochemistry analysis (IHC) has been shown to be sensitive for SCB diagnosis. However, weak focal pan-Trk nuclear staining was previously found in 10% of non-secretory breast carcinomas. To further examine pan-Trk IHC specificity, we evaluated pan-Trk staining in various breast carcinoma subtypes.

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of 346 invasive breast carcinomas (IBCs), including 8 SCBs and 48 triple-negative histological mimickers (36 metaplastic carcinomas, including 12 matrix-producing carcinomas; 5 adenoid cystic carcinomas; 5 apocrine carcinomas; 2 acinic cell carcinomas), 101 triple-negative IBCs of no special type, 101 estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative IBCs and 88 HER2-positive IBCs. Six salivary gland secretory carcinomas were also included. Pan-Trk IHC was performed on tumours using a rabbit monoclonal pan-Trk antibody. Any nuclear staining in the invasive carcinoma cells was considered positive.

RESULTS

All 14 secretory carcinomas from breast and salivary gland exhibited moderate to strong pan-Trk nuclear staining. In contrast, no pan-Trk nuclear staining was identified in any of the 338 non-secretory IBCs. Focal cytoplasmic pan-Trk staining was observed in nine non-secretory IBCs (2.7%), and was considered nonspecific and negative.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that pan-Trk nuclear staining is highly specific for SCB. In low-grade to intermediate-grade IBCs that share histological features with SCB, adding pan-Trk to a routing panel of estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor/HER2 is highly diagnostic. Our results also support using pan-Trk IHC to differentiate SCB from its triple-negative histological mimickers, such as adenoid cystic carcinoma, matrix-producing carcinoma, apocrine carcinoma and acinic cell carcinoma.

NTRK fusions in solid tumours: what every pathologist needs to know

Fusions involving the Neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) gene family (NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3) are targetable oncogenic alterations that are found in a diverse range of tumours. There is an increasing demand to identify tumours which harbour these fusions to enable treatment with selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as larotrectinib and entrectinib. NTRK fusions occur in a wide range of tumours including rare tumours such as infantile fibrosarcoma and secretory carcinomas of the salivary gland and breast, as well as at low frequencies in more common tumours including melanoma, colorectal, thyroid and lung carcinomas. Identifying NTRK fusions is a challenging task given the different genetic mechanisms underlying NTRK fusions, their varying frequency across different tumour types, complicated by other factors such as tissue availability, optimal detection methods, accessibility and costs of testing methods. Pathologists play a key role in navigating through these complexities by determining optimal approaches to NTRK testing which has important therapeutic and prognostic implications. This review provides an overview of tumours harbouring NTRK fusions, the importance of identifying these fusions, available testing methods including advantages and limitations, and generalised and tumour-specific approaches to testing.

Diagnostic accuracy of pan-TRK immunohistochemistry in differentiating secretory carcinoma from acinic cell carcinoma of salivary gland-A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Secretory carcinoma (SC) is a well-established salivary gland malignancy that has earned its popularity for its unique clinicopathological behavior. Although it is an indolent malignancy, few of them have been reported with high grade transformation making it mandatory to differentiate it from its prime histological mimicker, acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC). Recently, many studies have been directed toward validating the sensitivity and specificity of pan-TRK IHC for confirming ETV6::NTRK3 gene fusion in SCs involving salivary gland.

AIM

The aim of the present systematic review was to establish the diagnostic utility of pan-TRK immunostaining in histological differentiation of SC from AciCC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An electronic search was carried out using MEDLINE by PubMed, Scopus, Google scholar, Trip, Cochrane library and EMBASE databases. Articles in which SC assessed with pan-TRK immunohistochemical expressions were included for systematic review and their staining pattern (cytoplasmic, nuclear and/or combined), sensitivity, specificity, positive as well as negative predictive were gathered. Risk of bias was analyzed for each study using QUADAS-2 tool.

RESULTS

Thirteen eligible articles were included for the quantitative analysis, which revealed positive immunostaining of pan-TRK by nearly all the ETV6::NTRK3 fusion prevalent SCs alongside negative expression in almost all the cases of AciCC with 100% of sensitivity as well as specificity.

CONCLUSION

The evidence from the included studies supports that pan-TRK immunostaining could be used as a reliable preliminary screening tool for discerning SC from AciCC. PROSPERO No: CRD42022308913.

A systematic comparison of pan-Trk immunohistochemistry assays among multiple cancer types

AIMS

NTRK rearranged tumours are rare but can be successfully treated using anti-TRK-targeted therapies, making NTRK testing important for treatment choices in patients with advanced cancers. Pan-Trk immunohistochemistry (IHC) has become a valuable and affordable screening tool in many laboratories. Unfortunately, the choice of antibodies and IHC protocols to investigate biomarkers is not standardised. In this study, we compared the performance of four pan-Trk IHC methods, using three different clones, primarily in NTRK fusion-positive tumours.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied the performance of four pan-Trk IHC methods using three different clones: EPR17341 (Abcam and Ventana), EP1058Y (Abcam) and A7H6R (Cell Signaling) in 22 molecularly confirmed NTRK rearranged tumours. Additionally, selected NTRK fusion-negative tumours were further included: NTRK mutated (n = 8) and amplified (n = 15) tumours as well as NTRK fusion-negative tumours driven by other gene fusions, such as ALK, ROS1 and BCOR (n = 20), as well as salivary gland tumours (n = 16). Inter-rater agreement of three pathologists was additionally calculated, including H-score. With clone EPR17341 (Abcam in-house and ready-to-use Ventana protocol), all molecularly confirmed NTRK1-3 rearranged tumours were positively detected by immunohistochemistry, while the other clones missed NTRK2-3 rearranged tumours. For the fusion-negative cohort we found the best performance (least false-positive cases) using the clone A7H6R (Cell Signalling).

CONCLUSION

Given the therapeutic importance, testing for NTRK rearrangements in daily practice has become necessary and, despite IHC being a fast and affordable tool, using it in routine diagnostics is complicated and requires a high level of expertise.

TRK Protein Expression in Merkel Cell Carcinoma Is Not Caused by NTRK Fusions

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive cutaneous malignant tumor with neuroendocrine differentiation, with a rapidly growing incidence rate, high risk of recurrence, and aggressive behavior. The available therapeutic options for advanced disease are limited and there is a pressing need for new treatments. Tumors harboring fusions involving one of the neurotrophin receptor tyrosine kinase (NTRK) genes are now actionable with targeted inhibitors. NTRK-fused genes have been identified in neuroendocrine tumors of other sites; thus, a series of 76 MCCs were firstly analyzed with pan-TRK immunohistochemistry and the positive ones with real-time RT-PCR, RNA-based NGS, and FISH to detect the eventual underlying gene fusion. Despite 34 MCCs showing pan-TRK expression, NTRK fusions were not found in any cases. As in other tumors with neural differentiation, TRK expression seems to be physiological and not caused by gene fusions.

Advancement of secretory breast carcinoma: a narrative review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Secretory breast carcinoma (SBC) is a rare breast malignancy. Most available studies on SBC are case reports or small case series, and the few large-sample studies available lack critical information due to database limitations. To improve the understanding of SBC and provide a reference for clinical practice, we systematically reviewed the demographic, clinical, pathologic, and genetic characteristics of SBC, as well as its treatment and prognosis.

METHODS

We conducted a PubMed search with the keywords "secretory breast carcinoma" or "juvenile breast carcinoma". Relevant English-language publications published from January 1966 to February 2022 were screened manually at 3 levels-title, abstract, and full text-to identify the articles that presented the demographic, clinical, pathologic, and genetic characteristics of SBC, as well as its treatment and prognosis.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS

SBC lacks specific clinical manifestations and has typical pathological and molecular characteristics, including intracellular and extracellular eosinophilic secretions, immune spectrum similar to hormone receptor-positive tumors, and the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene. Surgery remains the primary treatment for SBC. Postoperative radiotherapy is recommended by most researchers for adult SBC but not for pediatric patients. The evidence of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy is insufficient, and targeted therapy of the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene shows a good response. Most patients with SBC have a good prognosis except for a few patients who experience distant metastases. Future studies will be focused on the molecular characteristics of those patients with SBC who have a poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of histopathology and molecular genetics has promoted the progress of the clinical diagnosis of SBC. The purpose of this review is to serve as a guide for the better clinical treatment of SBC, particularly in the areas of disease identification and prognosis classification for patients.

Larotrectinib Treatment for Patients With TRK Fusion-Positive Salivary Gland Cancers

BACKGROUND

Larotrectinib is a first-in-class, highly selective, and central nervous system-active tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with TRK fusion cancer. We report the efficacy and safety of larotrectinib in patients with TRK fusion-positive salivary gland cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with TRK fusion-positive salivary gland cancer treated with larotrectinib were identified from two clinical trials (NCT02122913 and NCT02576431). Patients received larotrectinib 100 mg twice daily (BID) except for one patient who received 150 mg BID in the phase I trial. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by the investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.

RESULTS

At the data cut-off (July 20, 2020), 24 patients with TRK fusion-positive salivary gland cancer had been treated. The most common histologies were secretory carcinoma (54%), adenocarcinoma (25%), and mucoepidermoid carcinoma (13%). All 24 patients had an ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion. The ORR was 92% (95% confidence interval, 73-99). Best overall response was complete response in three (13%) patients, partial response in 19 (79%), and progressive disease in two (8%). The rate of progression-free survival at 24 months was 78% (median follow-up 30.9 months). Most treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were grade 1-2, and no patients discontinued treatment due to AEs.

CONCLUSION

Larotrectinib demonstrated robust and durable efficacy in patients with TRK fusion-positive salivary gland tumors of various histologies, and a favorable safety profile. These findings support NTRK gene fusion testing in patients with advanced salivary gland cancers.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV NUMBERS

NCT02122913 and NCT02576431.

Secretory carcinoma of the salivary gland, a rare entity: An international multi-institutional study

BACKGROUND

Secretory carcinoma (SC) of the salivary gland is a rare entity with limited published literature on cytomorphology. The authors present the largest cohort to date of SC fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) cases.

METHODS

FNA cases of histologically confirmed SC were retrospectively retrieved from 12 academic institutions in the United States, Italy, Finland, and Brazil. The collated data included patient demographics, imaging findings, cytopathologic diagnoses according to the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology, cytomorphologic characteristics, and immunohistochemical/molecular profiles.

RESULTS

In total, 40 SCs were identified (male‐to‐female ratio, 14:26) in patients with a mean age of 52 years (age range, 13‐80 years). Ultrasound imagining revealed a hypoechoic, ovoid, poorly defined, or lobulated mass. The most common primary site was the parotid gland (30 of 40 tumors). Regional lymph node metastasis (9 patients) and distant metastasis (4 patients; brain, liver, lungs, and mediastinum) were noted. Two patients died of disease. FNA smears were cellular and demonstrated mainly large, round cells with intracytoplasmic vacuoles or granules and round‐to‐oval nuclei with smooth nuclear contour, minimal irregularities, and prominent nucleoli arranged predominantly in clusters, papillary formations, and single cells. The background was variable and contained inflammatory cells, mucin, or proteinaceous material. The diagnoses were malignant (19 of 38 tumors; 50%), suspicious for malignancy (10 of 38 tumors; 26%), salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (7 of 38 tumors; 18%), and atypia of undetermined significance (2 of 38 tumors; 6%) according to the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology. Two malignant cases (2 of 40 tumors; 5%) were metastases. The neoplastic cells were immunoreactive for S100 (23 of 24 tumors), mammaglobin (18 of 18 tumors), GATA‐3 (13 of 13 tumors), AE1/AE3 (7 of 7 tumors), and vimentin (6 of 6 tumors). ETV6‐NTRK3 fusion was detected in 32 of 33 tumors by fluorescence in situ hybridization (n = 32) and next‐generation sequencing (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Familiarity with cytomorphologic features and the immunohistochemical/molecular profile of SC can enhance diagnostic accuracy.;

Secretory carcinoma of the salivary gland, which may manifest with diverse cytomorphology, mammaglobin expression, and ETV6 rearrangement or ETV6‐NTRK3 fusion, was investigated along with cytomorphologic features to facilitate an accurate diagnosis. The results indicated that familiarity with these features and with the immunohistochemical/molecular profile of secretory carcinoma of the salivary gland enhanced diagnostic accuracy.

The Use of Pan-Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase Immunohistochemistry as a Screening Tool for the Detection of Neurotrophic Tropomyosin-Related Kinase Fusions: Real-World Data from a National Multicentric Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

The neurotrophic tropomyosin-related kinase (NTRK) genes encode the tropomyosin receptor kinases (TRKs). Patients with solid tumors harboring an oncogenic NTRK fusion are eligible for treatment with TRK inhibitors. NTRK fusion is often associated with TRK overexpression. Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC) is used to screen for NTRK fusions, but immunoreactivity patterns are poorly defined.

METHODS

Data on pan-TRK immunoreactivity patterns in 2,669 solid tumors (comprising carcinomas, sarcomas, and melanocytic lesions) were retrospectively collected by nine laboratories and comprised tumor type, percentage of pan-TRK-positive tumor cells, staining intensity, cytoplasmic, membrane and/or nuclear staining pattern, and the presence or absence of NTRK fusion.

RESULTS

Overall, 2,457 tumors (92%) were pan-TRK negative and 212 neoplasms (8%) were pan-TRK positive. Twenty-two pan-TRK-positive tumors (0.8%) harbored an NTRK fusion, representing 10% of all pan-TRK-positive tumors. Cytoplasmic immunoreactivity was most often observed, followed by membrane immunoreactivity. Nuclear pan-TRK positivity was least frequent, but was most often (33%) associated with NTRK fusion.

CONCLUSION

Pan-TRK IHC can be used to screen for NTRK fusions, especially in commonly diagnosed solid tumors with low NTRK fusion prevalence. In case of pan-TRK immunoreactivity, regardless of its intensity and tumor cell percentage, subsequent molecular tests should be performed to formally confirm the presence or absence of NTRK fusions.

Identification of LMO2 as a new marker for acinic cell carcinoma of salivary gland

Background

The distinction between acinic cell carcinoma (ACC) and secretory carcinoma (SC) of the salivary gland is hampered by the lack of specific diagnostic markers. It is known the cytoplasm of glandular cells in the salivary gland immunohistochemically expresses LIM Domain Only 2 (LMO2). Herein, we aim to evaluate the expression status of LMO2 in a large cohort of tumors of the salivary gland, with an emphasis on its significance in the distinction of ACC and SC.

Methods

Immunohistochemical stains were performed to evaluate the expression of LMO2 in normal tissues and tumors of salivary gland.

Results

LMO2 was expressed in normal serous acinar cells of the salivary gland. We also found the cytoplasmic immunostaining of LMO2 was specific and sensitive for the recognition of ACCs including those with morphological overlaps with SCs, whereas the cytoplasmic expression of LMO2 was not detected in SCs.

Conclusions

LMO2 is useful for the recognition of ACC and is of potential value in distinguishing ACC from SC.

Mutational and immunologic Landscape in malignant Salivary Gland Tumors harbor the potential for novel therapeutic strategies

Salivary gland carcinomas (SGC) are rare (3-6 % of all head and neck cancers) and show biological heterogeneity depending on the respective histological subtype. While complete surgical resection is the standard treatment for localized disease, chemotherapy or radiation therapy are frequently insufficient for the treatment of unresectable or metastasized SGC. Therefore, new therapeutic approaches such as molecularly targeted therapy or the application of immune checkpoint inhibition enhance the treatment repertoire. Accordingly, comprehensive analyses of the genomic landscape and the tumor-microenvironment (TME) are of crucial importance in order to optimize and individualize SGC treatment. This manuscript combines the current scientific knowledge of the composition of the mutational landscape and the TME in SGCs harboring the potential for novel (immune-) targeted therapeutic strategies.

Pan-TRK Immunohistochemistry Is Highly Correlated With NTRK3 Gene Rearrangements in Salivary Gland Tumors

AIMS

Secretory carcinoma (SC) is characterized by ETV6 rearrangements, most often ETV6-NTRK3 fusion. Given its histologic overlap with other salivary gland tumors (SGTs), SCs can be difficult to diagnose without genetic confirmation. A recently developed pan-TRK (tropomyosin receptor kinase) antibody shows promise for identifying tumors with NTRK (neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor 3) fusions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of pan-TRK immunohistochemistry in distinguishing SCs from mimics and selecting patients eligible for TRK inhibitor clinical trials. We examined whole-tissue sections from 111 SGTs with molecular characterization, including 26 SCs (23 with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion and 3 with ETV6-RET fusion detected by ligation-dependent reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, next-generation sequencing and 85 non-SC SGTs (no ETV6-NTRK3 fusion). Immunohistochemistry was performed with a pan-TRK rabbit monoclonal antibody. When any pan-TRK staining (nuclear or cytoplasmic with any staining intensity) was considered to indicate positivity, 22 of 23 SCs with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion (95.7%) and 33 of 85 non-SC (38.8%) salivary neoplasms were positive, mainly basal cell adenoma, pleomorphic adenomas, adenoid cystic carcinomas, and epithelial-myoepithelial carcinomas. All SCs with ETV6-RET fusion were entirely negative. When only nuclear pan-TRK staining with any staining intensity was considered positive, 18 of 23 SCs with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion (78.3%) were positive, 11 among them with diffuse staining (>30% of cells). All non-SCs and SCs with ETV6-RET fusion were entirely negative. In comparison to molecular analysis (ligation-dependent reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, next-generation sequencing), nuclear pan-TRK IHC has a sensitivity of 78.3% and a specificity of 100% for diagnosing SCs with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion, 69% and 100% for SCs (all fusions). Pan-TRK is a reasonable screening test for diagnosing SCs among SGTs when taking only nuclear staining into account. Although pan-TRK expression is not entirely sensitive for SCs, nuclear staining is highly specific for SCs with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion. The lack of pan-TRK immunoreactivity in a subset of SCs is suggestive of atypical exons 4 to 14 or exons 5 to 14 ETV6-NTRK3 fusion or non-NTRK alternative fusion partners such as ETV6-RET. Pan-TRK staining can serve as a strong diagnostic marker to distinguish SC from it mimics and to select patients eligible for TRK inhibitor clinical trials.

Practical immunohistochemistry in the classification of salivary gland neoplasms

Diagnosis of salivary gland neoplasms can be challenging for surgical pathologists due to low incidence of tumors as well as overlapping histologic features. On small biopsy, the most important information to be conveyed for clinical management is the distinction between a benign/low grade tumor and a high grade carcinoma. This review will discuss the differential diagnosis of salivary gland tumors based on four broad morphologic patterns: basaloid/tubular/cribriform, (micro)cystic/secretory/mucinous, solid-nested/clear-spindled, and oncocytic/oncocytoid. With the assistance of immunohistochemistry, demonstration of the number of cell types (mainly epithelial versus myoepithelial/basal) can further subclassify tumors within these morphologic categories. Additional tumor-specific immunomarkers are useful in some cases. Underlying tumor-specific genetic anomalies can be of value, however, immunohistochemical correlates are only available for some. When used judiciously, in the correct morphologic context, and with knowledge of their limitations, immunohistochemical stains can aid in differentiating tumors with similar morphology.

A systematic review of secretory carcinoma of the salivary gland: where are we?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to describe the epidemiology, diagnostic criteria, differential diagnosis, treatment, prognostic factors, and treatment outcomes of secretory carcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

A comprehensive search of Lilacs, PubMed, Science Direct, and Web of Science databases was conducted to identify all case reports, letter to the editor, and histopathologic reclassifications regarding salivary gland secretory carcinoma published in English, Spanish, French, and Portuguese.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 119 studies, which totaled 642 secretory carcinoma diagnoses, with 239 case reports and 403 diagnostic reclassifications, mostly in the United States. The age range was 5 to 87 years, and cases were predominantly in males (58.7%) and mostly affecting the parotid glands (73.7%). The disease usually presents as a slow-growing, painless mass. The main differential diagnosis is acinic cell carcinoma, and the tumor is usually treated with surgery. The prognosis is considered favorable, although there have been reports of local recurrences, distant metastases, and deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important that clinicians become aware of this salivary gland neoplasm and report clinical data, clinical course, management and long-term follow-up. There is an urgent need to conduct more clinical trials, especially on tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors and other potential target therapy modalities.

A case of "ETV6-FISH-negative" secretory carcinoma of the parotid gland: immunohistochemical study

Secretory carcinoma of the salivary glands is a relatively new disease concept, and is characterized by "morphological resemblance to mammary secretory carcinoma and ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion." Herein we describe a confusing case and briefly discuss practical diagnostic problems. The patient was a 71-year-old Japanese man who had a tumor consistent with secretory carcinoma at the microscopic and immunohistochemical levels. Immunohistochemically, EMA and S100 protein were noted to be positive along with various cytokeratins as well as mammaglobin and pSTAT5. Moreover, vimentin was focally positive. Smooth muscle actin, p63, p40, and androgen receptor were negative. However, a search using fluorescence in situ hybridization did not reveal a definite split signal for the ETV6 gene. It is presumed that confirming the diagnosis of secretory carcinoma without genetic retrieval will be accepted as a diagnostic method, and we hope that worldwide general recognition may earlier reach "gradual acceptance."

EPR17341 and A7H6R pan-TRK Immunohistochemistry Result in Highly Different Staining Patterns in a Series of Salivary Gland Tumors

Patients with NTRK-rearranged tumors can be now treated using anti-TRK-targeted therapies making NTRK testing important for treatment choices in patients with advanced cancers. Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (IHC) could be a valuable premolecular screening strategy in this field. The choice of 1 IHC method or another requires to investigate for intermethod comparison. A high frequency of pan-TRK positive tumors among salivary gland tumors makes these tumors particularly appropriate for such a technical study. In this work, we studied the intermethod agreement for 2 pan-TRK IHC methods (using A7H6R and EPR17341 clones) in a file of salivary gland tumors of different subtypes. Among 71 tumors, pan-TRK IHC was diagnosed as positive (ie, H score ≥5) in 23 and 18 cases using EPR17341 and A7H6R clones, respectively, with a good intermethod agreement in terms of positive/negative result (κ, 0.70) but only a moderate agreement considering the H score values themselves (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.5399). Beyond the intensity of staining and the percentages of stained cells, major differences were also observed between the location and type of cells stained in positive cases between the 2 clones. The single NTRK-rearranged case in our series (ie, a NTRK3-rearranged salivary secretory carcinoma) was positive with the 2 pan-TRK antibodies. Future studies including molecularly proven NTRK-rearranged tumors remain required to further study and compare the performances of different pan-TRK clones in the screening of NTRK-rearranged cancers but it is now obvious that the staining patterns of A7H6R and EPR17341 clones are not strictly identical.

Targeted RNA sequencing in the routine clinical detection of fusion genes in salivary gland tumors

Salivary gland tumors represent a diverse group of neoplasms that occasionally pose a diagnostic challenge for pathologists, particularly with limited sampling. Gene fusions, which may reflect genetic drivers, are increasingly recognized in a subset of these neoplasms, and can be leveraged for diagnostic purposes. We performed a retrospective analysis on a cohort of 80 benign and malignant salivary gland tumors, enriched for subtypes known to harbor recurrent fusion events, to validate the diagnostic use of a targeted RNA sequencing assay to detect fusion transcripts. Testing identified fusion genes in 71% (24/34) of pleomorphic adenoma and carcinoma-ex-pleomorphic adenoma, with 56% of cases showing rearrangement of PLAG1 and 15% HMGA2. In addition to confirming known partners for these genes, novel PLAG1 fusion partners were identified, including DSTN, NTF3, and MEG3; CNOT2 was identified as a novel fusion partner for HMGA2. In adenoid cystic carcinoma, 95% of cases (19/20) were positive for a fusion event. MYB was rearranged in 60% (12/20), MYBL1 in 30% (6/20), and NFIB in 5% (1/20); two tumors exhibited novel fusion products, including NFIB-TBPL1 and MYBL1-VCPIP1. Fusion genes were identified in 64% (9/14) of cases of mucoepidermoid carcinoma; MAML2 was confirmed to partner with either CRTC1 (43%) or CRTC3 (21%). One salivary duct carcinoma was found to harbor a novel RAPGEF6-ACSL6 fusion gene. Finally, as anticipated, gene fusions were not detected in any of the five acinic cell carcinomas included in the cohort. In summary, targeted RNA sequencing represents a diagnostically useful ancillary technique for identifying a variety of existing, and novel, fusion transcripts in the classification of salivary gland neoplasms.

Diagnostic challenges and successful organ-preserving therapy in a case of secretory carcinoma of minor salivary glands

BACKGROUND

Secretory carcinoma is a more recently described subtype of salivary gland carcinoma that may pose diagnostic challenges and frequently harbors NTRK fusions that may successfully be targeted by TRK inhibitors in advanced disease.

CASE

We present the case of a female patient with secretory carcinoma arising in the base of tongue with persistent disease after debulking surgery and definitive chemoradiation. As an alternative to salvage surgery, which would have resulted in significant impairment of swallowing and speech function, a targeted therapy with the TRK-inhibitor larotrectinib against an identified ETV6-NTRK3 fusion product was initiated. Larotrectinib treatment has been well tolerated, resulted in durable complete response and the patient maintains good swallowing and speech function.

CONCLUSION

The presented case underscores the importance of the accurate diagnosis of secretory carcinoma. It further highlights the impact of molecular testing as targeted therapies may play an important role in the management of advanced salivary gland cancers.

The Diagnostic Utility of RAS Q61R Mutation-specific Immunohistochemistry in Epithelial-Myoepithelial Carcinoma

Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma (EMC) is a rare salivary gland cancer characterized by biphasic tubular structures composed of inner ductal and outer clear myoepithelial cells. Because of its histologic variety and overlap of histologic features with other salivary gland tumors, there are broad differential diagnoses. The HRAS Q61R mutation has been reported to be frequent in and specific to EMC. We evaluated the usefulness of RAS Q61R mutant-specific immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for detecting this genetic alteration in EMC. We investigated 83 EMC cases and 66 cases of salivary gland tumors with an EMC-like component, including pleomorphic adenoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, basal cell adenoma/adenocarcinoma, and myoepithelial carcinoma. Sanger sequencing was performed for HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS. The diffuse and membranous/cytoplasmic RAS Q61R IHC expression was observed in 65% of EMC cases, in which all cases harbored the HRAS Q61R mutation. IHC-positive cases were present only in de novo EMCs (54/76 cases, 71%) but not in EMCs ex pleomorphic adenoma. The immunoreactivity was almost always restricted to the myoepithelial cells. Conversely, all EMC cases lacking the HRAS Q61R mutation were negative on IHC. In addition, only 3% of EMC-like tumors showed the abovementioned immunopositivity. None of the cases examined carried KRAS or NRAS mutations. IHC for RAS Q61R is highly sensitive and specific for detecting the HRAS Q61R mutation in EMC. Since significant immunopositivity was almost exclusively identified in nearly two thirds of EMCs but seldom in the histologic mimics, the IHC of RAS Q61R is a useful tool for diagnosing EMC in general pathology laboratories.

Differential diagnosis and treatment of salivary secretory carcinoma and acinic cell carcinoma

Secretory carcinoma (SC) and acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC) are two rare tumors originating in the salivary gland of the head and neck. Before the World Health Organization (WHO) classified SC as a new entity in 2017, the majority of SC cases were incorrectly diagnosed as AciCC. Indeed, they are similar in biological behaviors, clinical manifestations and histomorphological features. Especially, SC and zymogen granule-poor AciCC are difficult to differentiate, which brings a tough challenge in clinical diagnosis. This article provides an updated understanding of the differential diagnosis in SC and AciCC from two main perspectives: histopathology and molecular genetics. The targeted therapies for both tumors are also mentioned. It aims to give some hints in clinical diagnosis and treatment, in hopes that patients with adequate diagnosis could obtain the opportunityformore effective treatment.

Immunocytochemistry for diagnostic cytopathology-A practical guide

Cytological specimens, which are obtained by minimally invasive methods, are an excellent source of diagnostic material. Sometimes they are the only material available for diagnosis as well as for prognostic/predictive markers. When cytomorphology is not straightforward, ancillary tests may be required for a definitive diagnosis to guide clinical management. Immunocytochemistry (ICC) is the most common and practical ancillary tool used to reach a diagnosis when cytomorphology is equivocal, to differentiate entities with overlapping morphological features, and to determine the cell lineage and the site of origin of a metastatic neoplasm. Numerous immunomarkers are available, and some are expressed in multiple neoplasms. To rule out entities within a differential diagnosis, the use of more than one marker, sometimes panels, is necessary. ICC panels for diagnostic purposes should be customised based on the clinical context and cytomorphology, and the markers should be used judiciously to preserve material for additional tests for targeted therapies in the appropriate setting. This review offers a practical guide for the use of ICC for diagnostic cytopathology, covering the most commonly encountered non-hematolymphoid diagnostic scenarios in various body sites.

[How to test for NTRK gene fusions: A practical approach for pathologists]

The recent availability of targeted anti-TRK therapies represents a new opportunity to treat patients with advanced cancers harboring NTRK gene fusions. In this article, we present an update on the practical modalities of implementing a "NTRK testing" to search for these fusions in view of the performances and availability of the different testing methods and the epidemiological characteristics of the tumors liable to present the NTRK1, NTRK2 or NTRK3 gene fusions.

ALK Rearrangements Characterize 2 Distinct Types of Salivary Gland Carcinomas: Clinicopathologic and Molecular Analysis of 4 Cases and Literature Review

The majority of salivary gland carcinomas are characterized by recurrent gene fusions that proved highly valuable diagnostically, but only rarely of therapeutic impact. Most of these fusion-positive carcinomas belong to the low-grade or intermediate-grade biological category. To date, only 5 cases of salivary gland carcinomas carrying an oncogenic ALK fusion have been reported in 4 recent studies, but their phenotypic spectrum and their nosological classification remain uncharacterized. We herein describe in detail the clinicopathologic and molecular features of 4 ALK-fusion-positive salivary carcinomas and review previously reported cases to assess if they could be classified into a defined World Health Organization (WHO) category. Patients were 3 men and 1 woman aged from 67 to 79 years (median: 70 y). All tumors originated in the parotid gland. Their size ranged from 1.1 to 3 cm (mean, 2 cm). Three tumors were de novo high-grade salivary duct carcinomas (SDCs) and 1 was a low-grade intercalated-type intraductal carcinoma. Histologically, high-grade tumors were predominantly solid, composed of intimately admixed basal (CK5+, androgen-) and luminal (CK5-, androgen+) components. The remarkable basal component showed squamoid basophilic pattern imparting an adenosquamous-like appearance in all cases. Conventional apocrine intraductal high-grade carcinoma was noted in 1 case. Prominent intraductal growth of the solid basal component (highlighted by p63 staining) was seen in all cases. The tumor cells expressed CK7 (3/3), mammaglobin (3/3, 1 focal), GATA3 (3/3, 1 focal), variably CK5 (3/3), and focally the androgen receptor (1/3), but lacked expression of HER2/neu, SOX10, MUC4, TTF1, S100, and Napsin A. The low-grade tumor showed classic histologic and immunophenotypic features of intercalated-type noninvasive intraductal carcinoma. Molecular profiling showed rearrangements involving exon 20 of ALK in all cases, confirmed by ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC and FISH). The fusion partner was EML4 (n=2) and STRN (n=1) in high-grade tumors and EML4 in the intraductal carcinoma. Two patients with high-grade tumors developed progressive disease (1 died at 9 mo; 1 alive under palliative therapy at 5 mo). This series and a review of 5 published cases indicate that ALK rearrangements characterize 2 distinct subsets of salivary gland carcinomas in the spectrum of high-grade androgen-poor, basal-like SDC (total reported: 5 cases) and low-grade intercalated-type intraductal carcinomas (4 cases). Given the therapeutic relevance of ALK fusions, inclusion of ALK IHC in any atypical-looking or androgen-poor SDC and in high-grade adenocarcinoma-not otherwise specified is recommended. Absence of aberrant ALK expression in genetically characterized secretory (n=15) and intraductal (n=9) carcinomas lacking ALK fusions underlines the value of ALK IHC as a diagnostic screening method for identifying potential cases.

Molecular Pathology of Salivary Gland Neoplasms: Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Predictive Perspective

Salivary gland neoplasms are an uncommon and widely heterogeneous group of tumors. In recent years, there has been considerable progress in efforts to reveal the molecular landscape of these tumors, although it is still limited and appears to be only the tip of the iceberg. Genomic aberrations, especially specific chromosomal rearrangements including CRTC1-MAML2 and CRTC3-MAML2 in mucoepidermoid carcinoma, MYB-NFIB and MYBL1-NFIB fusions in adenoid cystic carcinoma, PLAG1 and HMGA2 alterations in pleomorphic adenoma and carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma, ETV6-NTRK3 and ETV6-RET in secretory carcinoma, EWSR1-ATF1 and EWSR1-CREM in clear cell carcinoma, provide new insights into the molecular pathogenesis of various salivary gland neoplasms and help to better classify them. These genetic aberrations primarily serve as diagnostic tools in salivary gland tumor diagnosis; however, some also have promise as prognostic or predictive biomarkers. This review summarizes the latest developments in molecular pathology of salivary gland tumors with a focus on distinctive molecular characteristics.

Pan-tropomyosin receptor kinase immunoreactivity, ETV6-NTRK3 fusion subtypes, and RET rearrangement in salivary secretory carcinoma

Salivary secretory carcinoma (SASC) is frequently associated with ETV6-neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) 3 fusion and more rarely with RET, MET, or ALK rearrangement. We aimed to elucidate the potential diagnostic utility of pan-tropomyosin receptor kinase (Trk) immunohistochemistry and its relationship with the fusion gene subtype in SASC. We examined 33 cases of SASC for immunoexpression of pan-Trk, ALK and ROS1, and gene rearrangement of the ETV6, NTRK3, and RET genes using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Thirty (90.9%) of 33 SASCs harbored ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene transcripts by RT-PCR and/or both ETV6 and NTRK3 gene rearrangements by FISH, and 3 cases (9.1%) had RET gene rearrangement. Most NTRK3-rearranged SASCs (27/33 cases; 81.8%) had conventional ETV6 exon 5-NTRK3 exon 15 fusion, whereas 2 cases (6.1%) had both the conventional fusion and a novel ETV6 exon 4-NTRK3 exon 15 fusion variant. In the remaining one case (3%), only FISH revealed both ETV6 and NTRK3 rearrangements, suggesting an ETV6-NTRK3 fusion with an as yet undetermined break point. All 30 SASCs with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion and/or NTRK3 rearrangement showed nuclear and cytoplasmic immunoreactivity for pan-Trk. In contrast, 3 SASCs with RET rearrangement showed negative or only weak cytoplasmic staining for pan-Trk. There was no case harboring ALK and ROS1 rearrangements. All 17 non-SASC tumors were negative for pan-Trk. The results suggest that nuclear and cytoplasmic immunoreactivity for pan-TRK may be helpful to identify ETV6-NTRK3-fused SASCs and to distinguish them from RET-rearranged SASCs and morphological mimics.

Detection of NTRK1/3 Rearrangements in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Using Immunohistochemistry, Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization, and Next-Generation Sequencing

NTRK1/3 rearrangements have been reported in 2.3-3.4% of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and are regarded as potential therapeutic targets. Recently, the application of immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect NTRK rearrangements has been widely discussed. The current study aimed to characterize the clinicopathological features of PTC with NTRK1/3 fusions, to examine the utility of pan-TRK IHC, and to compare IHC with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and next-generation sequencing (NGS). In a cohort of 525 consecutive PTC cases, 60 BRAF^V600E-negative cases underwent complete analyses of FISH, and 12 (2.3%) cases with NTRK1/3 break-apart were found. A novel ERC1-NTRK3 fusion was identified by NGS in one case. Pathological features of non-infiltrative tumor border, clear cell change, and reduced nuclear elongation and irregularity were significantly more common in NTRK1/3-rearranged PTC when compared with 48 BRAF^V600E-negative non-NTRK1/3 PTC cases. In whole tissue sections, pan-TRK IHC was positive in 3/7 (42.9%) cases with an ETV6-NTRK3 rearrangement including 2 cases with low percentage of stained tumor cells, 2/3 (66.7%) with non-ETV6 NTRK3 rearrangements, and 2/2 (100%) with NTRK1 rearrangements. All FISH-negative cases were negative for pan-TRK in tissue microarray sections. As a result, pan-TRK IHC showed a sensitivity of 58.3% and specificity of 100% for NTRK1/3 rearrangements in BRAF^V600E-negative PTC. In conclusion, NTRK1/3-rearranged PTC shared some unique morphologic features. Pan-TRK IHC showed high specificity and moderate sensitivity for NTRK1/3-rearranged PTC and should be interpreted with caution due to staining heterogeneity. Based on the above findings, we propose an algorithm integrating morphology, IHC, and molecular testing to detect NTRK1/3 rearrangements in PTC.

[Tumor microenvironment in salivary gland carcinomas: Consequences for new therapeutic concepts]

INTRODUCTION

Salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs) are rare tumors which represent a challenge for diagnosis and therapy due to their histological diversity and the different disease courses depending on the respective subtype. Little is known about the composition of the tumor microenvironment in SGCs. A more comprehensive understanding of the relevant molecular changes and immunological processes of the tumor and surrounding stroma could help to improve therapeutic efficiency, for example by adjuvant immunomodulation.

METHODS

This manuscript highlights recent studies analyzing the composition of the tumor microenvironment in salivary gland carcinomas.

RESULTS

The tumor microenvironment displays a significant diversity in the composition of immune cells among different tumor entities. In one third of the SGCs, an expression of cell surface molecule LAG3 on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes could be observed. LAG3-similar to CTLA‑4 and PD-1-inhibits cellular proliferation, activation, and homeostasis of antitumor-effective T cells. Especially, prognostically less favorable entities such as salivary duct carcinomas and adenocarcinomas NOS (not otherwise specified) yielded higher expressions.

CONCLUSIONS

LAG3 is particularly detectable in aggressive entities and advanced tumors. Hence, LAG3 inhibition poses a potential targeted therapy for advanced and metastatic SGCs.

MUC4 is a valuable marker for distinguishing secretory carcinoma of the salivary glands from its mimics

AIMS

Secretory carcinoma (SC) (synonym: mammary analogue secretory carcinoma) is a low-grade salivary gland tumour that occurs in both major and minor salivary glands. SC is known for its wide morphological, architectural and immunohistochemical spectrum, which overlaps with those of several salivary gland neoplasms, including acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC) and intercalated duct-type intraductal carcinoma (IDC) in major salivary glands, and polymorphous adenocarcinoma (PAC) in minor salivary glands. These tumours share with SC some morphological features and SOX10 immunoreactivity; also, with the exception of AciCC, they all coexpress S100 and mammaglobin.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We compared MUC4 and mammaglobin expression in 125 salivary gland carcinomas (54 genetically confirmed SCs, 20 AciCCs, 21 PACs, and 30 IDCs) to evaluate the potential of these two markers to differentiate these entities. Moderate to strong diffuse MUC4 positivity was detected in 49 SCs (90.7%), as compared with none of the IDCs and PACs. In contrast, mammaglobin was frequently expressed in SCs (30 of 36 cases; 83.3%), IDCs (24/28; 85.7%), and PACs (7/19; 36.8%). Two of three high-grade SCs lost MUC4 expression in the high-grade tumour component. No significant correlation was found between MUC4 expression and the fusion variant in SC (ETV6-NTRK versus non-ETV6-NTRK).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study identify MUC4 as a sensitive (90.7%) and specific (100%) marker for SC, with high positive (100%) and negative (93.4%) predictive values. Thus, MUC4 may be used as a surrogate for SC in limited biopsy material and in cases with equivocal morphology.

Diagnosis and management of tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) fusion sarcomas: expert recommendations from the World Sarcoma Network

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignancies with mesenchymal lineage differentiation. The discovery of neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions as tissue-agnostic oncogenic drivers has led to new personalized therapies for a subset of patients with sarcoma in the form of tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors. NTRK gene rearrangements and fusion transcripts can be detected with different molecular pathology techniques, while TRK protein expression can be demonstrated with immunohistochemistry. The rarity and diagnostic complexity of NTRK gene fusions raise a number of questions and challenges for clinicians. To address these challenges, the World Sarcoma Network convened two meetings of expert adult oncologists and pathologists and subsequently developed this article to provide practical guidance on the management of patients with sarcoma harboring NTRK gene fusions. We propose a diagnostic strategy that considers disease stage and histologic and molecular subtypes to facilitate routine testing for TRK expression and subsequent testing for NTRK gene fusions.

Pan-TRK Immunohistochemistry: An Example-Based Practical Approach to Efficiently Identify Patients With NTRK Fusion Cancer

CONTEXT.—

Food and Drug Administration-approved TRK inhibitors with impressive overall response rates are now available for patients with multiple cancer types that harbor NTRK rearrangements, yet the identification of NTRK fusions remains a difficult challenge. These alterations are highly recurrent in extremely rare malignancies or can be detected in exceedingly small subsets of common tumor types. A 2-step approach has been proposed, involving a screening by immunohistochemistry (IHC) followed by a confirmatory method (fluorescence in situ hybridization, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, or next-generation sequencing) in cases expressing the protein. However, there is no interpretation guide for any of the available IHC clones.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide a pragmatic update on the use of pan-TRK IHC. Selected examples of the different IHC staining patterns across multiple histologies are shown.

DATA SOURCES.—

Primary literature review with PubMed, combined with personal diagnostic and research experience.

CONCLUSIONS.—

In-depth knowledge of pan-TRK IHC will help pathologists implement a rational approach to the detection of NTRK fusions in human malignancies.

Salivary Gland Carcinoma: Novel Targets to Overcome Treatment Resistance in Advanced Disease

Salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs) account for <5% of head and neck malignant neoplasms, further subcategorized in over 20 histological subtypes. For the most part, treatment for advanced disease is guided by morphology. SGCs in general respond poorly to a wide array of standard chemotherapy, with short durability, and significant toxicity. More recently, next-generation sequencing provided significant input on the molecular characterization of each SGC subtype, not only improving diagnostic differentiation between morphologically similar tumor types but also identifying novel driver pathways that determine tumor biology and may be amenable to targeted therapy. Among the most common histological subtype is adenoid cystic carcinoma, which often harbors a chromosome translocation resulting in an MYB-NFIB oncogene, with various degrees of Myb surface expression. In a smaller subset, NOTCH1 mutations occur, conferring a more aggressive pattern and potential sensitivity to Notch inhibitors. Salivary duct carcinomas may overexpress Her-2 and androgen receptors, with promising clinical outcomes after exposure to targeted therapies approved for other indications. Secretory carcinoma, previously known as mammary analog secretory carcinoma, is distinguished by an ETV6-NTRK3 fusion that can both help differentiate it from its morphologically similar acinar cell carcinoma and make it susceptible to Trk inhibitors. In the present article, we discuss the molecular abnormalities, their impact on tumor biology, and therapeutic opportunities for the most common SGC subtypes and review published and ongoing clinical trials and future perspectives for this rare disease.

NR4A3 Immunohistochemistry Reliably Discriminates Acinic Cell Carcinoma from Mimics

Acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC) harbors a recurrent t(4;9)(q13;q31) translocation, which leads to upregulation of Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 4 Group A Member 3 (NR4A3). Previous work on tissue microarrays suggests that NR4A3 immunohistochemistry (IHC) may be useful in the diagnosis of AciCC. Thus far, only a single study has evaluated the utility of NR4A3 immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the diagnosis of AciCC, using a tissue microarray to assess most non-AciCC tumor types. Herein we evaluate the diagnostic performance of NR4A3 IHC for AciCC in a large cohort of 157 salivary gland tumors, using whole tissue sections. The cohort consisted of 37 AciCC (6 of them (16%) with high grade transformation), 30 secretory carcinomas (SC), and 90 additional salivary gland tumors, including mucoepidermoid carcinomas (MEC), polymorphous adenocarcinomas (PAC), pleomorphic adenomas (PA), salivary duct carcinomas (SDC), and adenoid cystic carcinomas (AdCC). NR4A3 nuclear staining by IHC was considered positive if present in more than 5% of tumor cells. Overall, 92% of AciCC (34/37) expressed NR4A3 by IHC, with strong (89%) or moderate (3%) nuclear staining, yielding a sensitivity of 92%. IHC detected NR4A3 expression in all cases of recurrent/metastatic AciCC and tumors with high grade transformation. Importantly, all SC were negative for NR4A3 IHC, with no staining in 28/30 cases and weak focal staining, in < 5% of cells, in 2/30 (7%). Similarly, all MEC (20/20), SDC (20/20) and AdCC (10/10) were negative for NR4A3 by IHC, as were most PA (18/20; 15%) and PAC (18/20; 5%). Two PA and two PAC showed multifocal expression of NR4A3 in more than 5% of cells, of weak intensity in 3 cases and moderate in 1 PAC, yielding an overall specificity of 97% for NR4A3 IHC for the diagnosis of AciCC. In conclusion, NR4A3 is a highly sensitive and specific immunohistochemical marker for AciCC; moderate to strong and/or diffuse NR4A3 expression is a consistent and diagnostic feature of AciCC.

An Algorithmic Immunohistochemical Approach to Define Tumor Type and Assign Site of Origin

Immunohistochemistry represents an indispensable complement to an epidemiology and morphology-driven approach to tumor diagnosis and site of origin assignment. This review reflects the state of my current practice, based on 15-years' experience in Pathology and a deep-dive into the literature, always striving to be better equipped to answer the age old questions, "What is it, and where is it from?" The tables and figures in this manuscript are the ones I "pull up on the computer" when I am teaching at the microscope and turn to myself when I am (frequently) stuck. This field is so exciting because I firmly believe that, through the application of next-generation immunohistochemistry, we can provide better answers than ever before. Specific topics covered in this review include (1) broad tumor classification and associated screening markers; (2) the role of cancer epidemiology in determining pretest probability; (3) broad-spectrum epithelial markers; (4) noncanonical expression of broad tumor class screening markers; (5) a morphologic pattern-based approach to poorly to undifferentiated malignant neoplasms; (6) a morphologic and immunohistochemical approach to define 4 main carcinoma types; (7) CK7/CK20 coordinate expression; (8) added value of semiquantitative immunohistochemical stain assessment; algorithmic immunohistochemical approaches to (9) "garden variety" adenocarcinomas presenting in the liver, (10) large polygonal cell adenocarcinomas, (11) the distinction of primary surface ovarian epithelial tumors with mucinous features from metastasis, (12) tumors presenting at alternative anatomic sites, (13) squamous cell carcinoma versus urothelial carcinoma, and neuroendocrine neoplasms, including (14) the distinction of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma from well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, site of origin assignment in (15) well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor and (16) poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, and (17) the distinction of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor G3 from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma; it concludes with (18) a discussion of diagnostic considerations in the broad-spectrum keratin/CD45/S-100-"triple-negative" neoplasm.

NTRK gene rearrangements are highly enriched in MLH1/PMS2 deficient, BRAF wild-type colorectal carcinomas-a study of 4569 cases

NTRK gene rearrangements are important to identify as predictors of response to targeted therapy in many malignancies. Only 0.16-0.3% of colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) harbor these fusions making universal screening difficult. We therefore investigated whether pan-Trk immunohistochemistry (IHC), mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd), and BRAFV600E mutation status could be used to triage molecular testing for NTRK gene rearrangements in CRC. CRCs from 4569 unselected patients underwent IHC in TMA format with two different anti-pan-Trk rabbit monoclonal antibodies. All positive cases were confirmed on whole sections and underwent RNA-sequencing. Pan-Trk IHC was positive in 0.2% of CRCs (9/4569). Both antibodies demonstrated similar staining characteristics with diffuse positive staining in all neoplastic cells. Of note 8/9 (89%) IHC positive cases were both MMRd (all showing MLH1/PMS2 loss) and lacked BRAFV600E mutation. That is, IHC was positive in 5.3% (8/152) MLH1/PMS2/BRAFV600E triple negative CRCs, but only 0.02% (1/4417) not showing this phenotype. All nine IHC positive CRCs demonstrated gene rearrangements (LMNA-NTRK1 in 5 CRCs, TPR-NTRK1, STRM-NTRK1, MUC2-NTRK2, and NTRK1 with an unknown partner in one each), suggesting close to 100% specificity for IHC in this sub-population. NTRK fusions were associated with right sided (p = 0.02), larger tumors (p = 0.029) with infiltrative growth (p = 0.021). As a part of universal Lynch syndrome screening many institutions routinely test all CRCs for MMRd, and then proceed to reflex BRAFV600E mutation testing in MLH1/PMS2 negative CRCs. We conclude that performing pan-Trk IHC on this preselected subgroup of MLH1/PMS2/BRAFV600E triple negative CRCs (only 3.3% of all CRC patients) is a resource effective approach to identify the overwhelming majority of CRC patients with NTRK gene fusions.

Pan-Trk immunohistochemistry reliably identifies ETV6-NTRK3 fusion in secretory carcinoma of the salivary gland

Secretory carcinoma of the salivary gland is a newly recognized entity that morphologically resembles breast secretory carcinoma and has a characteristic t(12;15)(p13;q25) ETV6-NTRK3 translocation. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analyses can detect the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion; however, both tests are expensive and not widely available. In this study, we aimed to determine whether pan-Trk immunohistochemistry (IHC) could detect ETV6-NTRK3 fusions as reliably as RT-PCR and FISH. We performed pan-Trk IHC in 70 salivary gland cancer samples, including secretory carcinomas, acinic cell carcinomas, and hybrid carcinomas. Nineteen tumors exhibited positive pan-Trk staining, including 16 secretory carcinomas, 2 hybrid carcinomas with a secretory carcinoma component, and 1 acinic cell carcinoma. Pan-Trk IHC staining was localized in the nucleus in 16 (84.2%) cases and in the cytoplasm and/or membrane in 3 (15.8%) cases. RT-PCR analysis for the ETV6-NTRK3 transcript was conducted in 45 samples; the fusion transcript was present in 11 of 12 secretory carcinomas and absent in 32 acinic cell carcinomas and 1 mucoepidermoid carcinoma. Pan-Trk IHC was positive in 10 of 11 salivary tumors that were positive for ETV6-NTRK3 by RT-PCR and negative in all 34 tumors that were negative for the fusion by RT-PCR. Therefore, in comparison with RT-PCR, pan-Trk IHC had a sensitivity of 90.9% and specificity of 100%. In conclusion, our data showed that pan-Trk IHC is a reasonable screening test for diagnosing secretory carcinoma of the salivary gland.

NTRK Fusions in Central Nervous System Tumors: A Rare, but Worthy Target

The neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) genes (NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3) code for three transmembrane high-affinity tyrosine-kinase receptors for nerve growth factors (TRK-A, TRK-B, and TRK-C) which are mainly involved in nervous system development. Loss of function alterations in these genes can lead to nervous system development problems; conversely, activating alterations harbor oncogenic potential, promoting cell proliferation/survival and tumorigenesis. Chromosomal rearrangements are the most clinically relevant alterations of pathological NTRK activation, leading to constitutionally active chimeric receptors. NTRK fusions have been detected with extremely variable frequencies in many pediatric and adult cancer types, including central nervous system (CNS) tumors. These alterations can be detected by different laboratory assays (e.g., immunohistochemistry, FISH, sequencing), but each of these approaches has specific advantages and limitations which must be taken into account for an appropriate use in diagnostics or research. Moreover, therapeutic targeting of this molecular marker recently showed extreme efficacy. Considering the overall lack of effective treatments for brain neoplasms, it is expected that detection of NTRK fusions will soon become a mainstay in the diagnostic assessment of CNS tumors, and thus in-depth knowledge regarding this topic is warranted.

Pan-Trk immunohistochemistry is a sensitive and specific ancillary tool for diagnosing secretory carcinoma of the salivary gland and detecting ETV6-NTRK3 fusion

AIMS

Secretory carcinoma (SC) of the salivary gland typically harbours ETV6-NTRK3 fusion, which can be utilised clinically to assist with diagnosis. Pan-Trk inhibitor therapy has demonstrated drastic responses in patients with NTRK-translocated tumours, including SC. Pan-Trk immunohistochemistry (IHC) is emerging as a sensitive and specific tool for detecting NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3 fusions in various cancers. We aimed to establish the specificity and sensitivity of pan-Trk IHC in diagnosing SC and detecting ETV6-NTRK3 fusion. A literature review on the utility of pan-Trk IHC was conducted.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Pan-Trk IHC was performed on 83 salivary gland neoplasms (29 SCs and 54 non-SCs). ETV6-NTRK3 fusion status was established in 25 cases. With any staining (nuclear or cytoplasmic) as a positive threshold, the sensitivity and specificity of pan-Trk IHC were 90% and 70% in diagnosing SC, and 100% and 0% in detecting NTRK3 fusion. When only pan-Trk nuclear staining was considered as positive, the sensitivity and specificity were 69% and 100% in diagnosing SC, and 92% and 100% in detecting NTRK3 fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Nuclear pan-Trk IHC is highly specific for SC diagnosis, with a specificity approaching 100%, making it a useful and precise diagnostic tool for differentiating SC from its histological mimics. On the other hand, any pan-Trk staining (nuclear or cytoplasmic) is highly sensitive for SC, and can serve as an attractive, cheap, fast and accessible screening tool for selecting patients to undergo confirmative molecular testing for clinical trials using TRK inhibitors.

Pan-TRK Immunohistochemistry: A Useful Diagnostic Adjunct For Secretory Carcinoma of the Breast

Secretory carcinoma is a special-type breast carcinoma underpinned by a recurrent t(12;15)(p13;q25) translocation resulting in ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) using a pan-TRK antibody has been recently shown to help identify NTRK rearrangements in other tumor types. The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic utility of pan-TRK IHC in secretory carcinoma of the breast. Pan-TRK IHC was performed using a rabbit monoclonal antibody on whole sections of 24 breast secretory carcinomas and tissue microarray sections of other breast carcinoma types (n=203) and histologic mimics (n=15). Cases were assessed for staining intensity and localization. The 24 patients with secretory carcinoma had a median age of 44 years and a median tumor size of 1.0 cm. ETV6 fluorescence in situ hybridization was positive in all cases tested (n=20). Twenty-three cases (95.8%) showed staining with pan-TRK, which was exclusively nuclear in 19, primarily nuclear with weak cytoplasmic staining in 3, and primarily cytoplasmic with focal nuclear staining in 1. The nuclear staining was diffuse in 17 and at least focally strong in 17. The only pan-TRK negative case was a core biopsy with limited tumor. Among the 203 nonsecretory carcinomas, 21 (10.3%) showed focal, weak nuclear staining in <5% of tumor cells and 1 (0.5%) showed focal membranous staining. All histologic mimics were negative. In conclusion, diffuse and/or at least focally strong nuclear pan-TRK staining is a sensitive and specific marker for secretory carcinoma of the breast.