Looking into digestive mixed neuroendocrine - nonneuroendocrine neoplasms: subtypes, prognosis, and predictive factors

Fine Needle Aspiration Cytological Diagnosis of Primary Breast Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma/Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Primary breast large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC)/squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), also referred to as mixed neuroendocrine/non-neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast (Br-MiNENs), represents an exceedingly rare malignancy. We report the first case of primary breast LCNEC/SCC diagnosed via ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy of the left supraclavicular and left internal mammary lymph nodes. The patient, a 40-year-old female, underwent a lumpectomy followed by breast-conserving surgery and was diagnosed with primary breast LCNEC. Notably, within merely four months following the breast-conserving surgery, PET-CT revealed lymph node enlargement, prompting the performance of FNA. FNA cytology of metastatic lymph nodes revealed two distinct tumor components, allowing for clear differentiation between LCNEC and SCC in the smear. The diagnosis was further corroborated by immunocytochemical (ICC) staining of the cell blocks. Subsequently, histopathological re-examination of the breast mass revealed occult SCC components comprising less than 1% of the tumor cells. Additionally, the case exhibited triple-negative breast cancer, with PIK3CA, TP53, RB1, and BCL2L11 mutations identified through next-generation sequencing (NGS). Br-MiNEN is exceedingly rare, and its cytological diagnosis poses significant challenges. It is recommended that a detailed and objective description of each tumor component and its proportion be provided. This report provides the first detailed description of the FNA cytology of LCNEC/SCC, thereby enhancing cytopathologists' comprehension of this tumor. Auxiliary studies, including ICC staining and molecular biology assays, are crucial for accurate diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis.

Lymph node metastatic patterns of gastric carcinoma with a combination of adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma components

BACKGROUND

Gastric mixed-adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (G-MANEC) is a subtype of gastric cancer. Building upon prior research findings, we propose that tumours containing both neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) components, with each component ranging from 1% to 99% of the tumour, be classified as a distinct entity. We hereby term this adenoneuroendocrine mixed gastric cancer (G-ANEC). Research on lymph node (LN) involvement in G-MANEC has focused mainly on metastasis status, with limited studies on metastatic composition.

AIM

To investigate the LN metastasis patterns of G-ANEC, the clinicopathological features associated with these metastasis patterns, and to explore adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for G-ANEC.

METHODS

We analyzed 68 G-ANEC cases treated with radical surgery and confirmed LN metastasis at Peking University Cancer Hospital between August 2012 and June 2022. Utilizing χ² tests in IBM statistical product and service solutions statistics and R software.

RESULTS

We identified three distinct LN metastasis patterns in G-ANEC that were significantly associated with the NEC proportion, tumour invasion depth, Lauren classification, and tumour location (P values: 0.008, 0.015, 0.01, and 0.004, respectively). When the SOX/XELOX regimen was applied for adjuvant chemotherapy, patients with LN metastasis comprising only AC exhibited better overall survival (OS) (94.25 ± 11.07 months vs 54.36 ± 11.36 months) than did those with NEC. When LN metastasis components contained NEC, there was a trend towards improved OS (64 ± 10.77 months vs 54.35 ± 11.36 months) and disease-free survival (71.28 ± 9.92 months vs 66.28 ± 11.93 months) in patients treated with the etoposide and cisplatin compared to those receiving the SOX/XELOX regimen.

CONCLUSION

We found a significant correlation between the NEC percentage, tumour invasion depth, Lauren classification, and tumour location and LN metastasis patterns in G-ANEC. For G-ANEC, a lower proportion of NEC or AC in the primary lesion does not preclude the possibility of these components metastasizing to the LNs. Different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens should be administered on the basis of the varying components of LN metastasis in patients with G-ANEC.

MiNEN of base of tongue - first case report in literature

INTRODUCTION

Mixed neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) refer to a heterogenous group of rare neoplasms which is usually composed of a neuroendocrine population which is either well differentiated and more frequently poorly differentiated along with a non-neuroendocrine component, each of the above accounting for at least 30% of the tumour population. It is most commonly seen in the gastro-entero-pancreatic tract. MiNENs have an aggressive behaviour due to its high grade neuroendocrine component and have poor prognosis. This is the first case reported in literature of a MiNEN in the oropharynx.

CASE REPORT

69 year old male patient with no co morbidities presented to the outpatient department with complains of odynophagia for 1 month. He had history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with right selective neck dissection (SND) done in 2019 for carcinoma base of tongue. On flexible laryngoscopy, an ulcerative lesion was noted over the left base of tongue. Although PET scan done showed no significant abnormalities. Biopsy from the lesion showed features of poorly differentiated carcinoma along with morphological features of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (small cell carcinoma). He was planned for upfront surgery (TORS with left SND). Post operatively recovery was uneventful and patient was on ryles tube feed for 12 days. Final histopathology report showed features of mixed neuroendocrine non neuroendocrine neoplasm. He has been on follow up for 1 year with no features of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

MiNEN is an aggressive tumour which has poor prognosis and is most commonly located in the gastrointestinal tract. This is the first case reported in oropharynx who has been successfully treated and has been on follow up.

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors-Diagnostic Pitfalls of Non-Diabetic Severe Hypoglycemia: Literature Review and Case Report

Background: Hypoglycemia in the case of persons without diabetes is a rare event, being usually, initially misinterpreted based on the symptoms that can mimic various diseases, especially of a neuro-psychiatric nature. In the case of the identification of insulin-mediated hypoglycemia, the evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, which represent the most common and worrisome causes of non-diabetic insulin-mediated hypoglycemia, must be considered. Case Report: We present the case of a 57-year-old patient, hospitalized for a history of approximately one month of recurrent episodes of symptoms suggestive for severe hypoglycemia. The biological evaluation performed during an episode of hypoglycemia showed a plasma glucose value of 44 mg/dL, insulinemia 16.3 µU/mL, C peptide 3.72 ng/mL, HbA1c 4.99%, absence of urinary ketone bodies and anti-insulin antibodies <0.03 U/mL. The CT and MRI examination showed a 15.3/15 mm rounded tumor in the pancreatic corporeo-caudal region. The pancreatic tumor formation was enucleated and the histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis confirmed the diagnosis of the pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor with a positive reaction for chromogranin A, synaptophysin and insulin, without malignancy features (Ki 67 positive in 1% of the tumor cells). The postoperative evolution was favorable, without episodes of hypoglycemia, the fasting insulinemia one day after surgery being 4.1 µU/mL and HbA1c at three weeks postoperatively being 5.51%. Conclusions: The management of patients with hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia secondary to insulinoma involves multidisciplinary collaboration with an important role in recognizing symptoms suggestive of hypoglycemia in a person without diabetes, initiating biological and imaging evaluation, establishing the optimal therapeutic option and histopathological confirmation.

Pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms: the molecular landscape, therapeutic challenges, and diagnosis and management strategies

Lung neuroendocrine neoplasms are a group of diverse, heterogeneous tumours that range from well-differentiated, low-grade neuroendocrine tumours-such as typical and atypical carcinoids-to high-grade, poorly differentiated aggressive malignancies, such as large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). While the incidence of SCLC has decreased, the worldwide incidence of other pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms has been increasing over the past decades. In addition to the standard histopathological classification of lung neuroendocrine neoplasms, the introduction of molecular and sequencing techniques has led to new advances in understanding the biology of these diseases and might influence future classifications and staging that can subsequently improve management guidelines in the adjuvant or metastatic settings. Due to the rarity of neuroendocrine neoplasms, there is a paucity of prospective studies that focus on the lungs, especially in rare, well-differentiated carcinoids and LCNECs. In contrast with the success of targeted therapies in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung often only have a few specific targetable gene alterations. Optimal therapy for LCNECs is not well defined and treatment recommendations are based on extrapolating guidelines for the management of patients with SCLC and NSCLC. This Review explores the epidemiology, diagnosis, and staging of lung neuroendocrine neoplasms to date. In addition, we focus on the evolving molecular landscape and biomarkers, ranging from tumour phenotypes to functional imaging studies and novel molecular biomarkers. We outline the various clinical outcomes, challenges, the treatment landscape, ongoing clinical trials, and future directions.

Characterizing esophageal mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms: insights from a retrospective multicenter study of clinical outcomes and prognostic indicators

Background

The esophageal mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) is an extremely rare but poor prognosis tumor.

Objectives

This retrospective study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics of MiNEN and to investigate postoperative survival and prognostic factors.

Design

This retrospective study analyzed 69 patients diagnosed with esophageal MiNEN at two major esophageal cancer centers in China from January 2000 to December 2021.

Methods

We assessed demographic data, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression models to evaluate prognostic factors.

Results

The most common histological types were combinations of small-cell carcinoma and squamous carcinoma (91.3%). The correct diagnostic rate of preoperative pathologic biopsy was only 4.3%. The median overall survival (OS) was 24.0 months, and disease-free survival (DFS) was 16.6 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 84.1%, 34.8%, and 25.3%, respectively. A peak period of recurrence or metastasis occurs in the first year after surgery, and regional lymph node recurrence is the main route of postoperative recurrence or metastasis. Tumor size, T-stage, N-stage, and tumor, lymph node, metastasis (TNM) stage were significant prognostic factors. Subgroup analyses showed that in patients with limited-stage MiNEN in stages I-III, the postoperative adjuvant treatment modality failed to improve OS and DFS compared with surgery alone. Postoperative adjuvant therapy also failed to prolong OS and DFS in patients with lymph node-positive MiNEN. No significant survival benefits were observed with different surgical techniques or adjuvant chemotherapy regimens.

Conclusion

Esophageal MiNEN has aggressive behavior and a poor prognosis. In China, the pathologic type of esophageal MiNEN may be dominated by a combination of small-cell carcinoma and squamous carcinoma. Early-stage disease significantly correlated with improved survival outcomes. Current treatment protocols, similar to those for other esophageal cancers, show limited efficacy in improving patient survival.

Clinicopathological correlations in 38 cases of gastroenteropancreatic high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms

Objective

Diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-HG-NENs), particularly G3 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) relies on histopathological morphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular biological markers, which are lacking especially in cases with ambiguous histomorphology. In this study to contribute to the development of more targeted treatment strategies, we examined various immunohistochemical and molecular biological markers and their association with clinicopathological features in GEP-HG-NENs.

Methods

We included 38 patients with GEP-HG-NENs in this study, with their retrospective follow-up data. The expression of tumour protein p53 (TP53), RB transcriptional corepressor 1 (RB1), somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2), clusterin (CLU), and marker of proliferation Ki-67 (MKI67) was immunohistochemically analysed. KRAS proto-oncogene, GTPase (KRAS) and B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) V600E expression was evaluated using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The relationships between immunohistochemical and molecular biological markers and clinicopathological characteristics were examined using a Cox risk regression model, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses.

Results

SSTR2, RB, TP53, and CLU expression differed between NET G3 and NECs, with variations among the NET G3 and small- and large-cell NEC (SCNEC and LCNEC, respectively) groups (p < 0.05). The median MKI67 proliferative index was approximately 40% and 70% in G3 NETs and NECs, respectively. The NET G3 group exhibited a median survival of 25 months, indicating a relatively better prognosis than that of the NECs group (median survival, 11 months). Both Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the Cox risk regression model indicated a statistical correlation among treatment methods, CLU expression, and prognosis (p < 0.05). The BRAF V600E mutation rate was 32.4% in G3 NETs and SCNEC, demonstrating a significant difference between both types (p = 0.0086). Furthermore, ROC curve analysis highlighted the diagnostic significance of the positive expression of the immunohistochemical markers CLU, SSTR2, and RB in identifying NET G3.

Conclusion

To guide more suitable treatment strategies, it is essential to develop and apply valuable and more targeted immunohistochemical and molecular pathological markers for a comprehensive analysis.

Distinctive Phenotypic and Microenvironmental Characteristics of Neuroendocrine Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma Components in Gastric Mixed Adenoneuroendocrine Carcinoma

This study aimed to conduct an in-depth examination of gene expression and microenvironmental profiles of gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and mixed adeno-NEC (MANEC). Tissue microarrays from 55 patients with gastric MANEC (N = 32) or NEC (N = 23) were analyzed using digital spatial profiling (GeoMx DSP, NanoString Technologies). Representative regions of interest were selected from the adenocarcinoma (ADC) portion (ADC-MANEC) and the NEC portion (NEC-MANEC) of the MANEC cores, and pure NEC (pNEC) cores. All regions of interest were separated into epithelial components and stromal components using the masking procedure in the GeoMx platform, followed by transcriptome analysis. Comparison of gene expression between ADC-MANEC and NEC-MANEC/pNEC identified several differentially expressed genes in the epithelial (including PEG10, MAP1B, STMN3, and AKT3) and stromal (FN1, COL1A1, SPARC, and BGN) components. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed that pathways related to the E2F target and G2M checkpoint were more enriched in NEC-MANEC and pNEC than in ADC-MANEC. Deconvolution analysis showed that the microenvironmental profile varied according to histologic differentiation. In ADC-MANEC, intraepithelial infiltrating immune cells were relatively more numerous, whereas fibroblasts in the stroma were more abundant in NEC-MANEC and pNEC. This study confirmed the distinct expression profile of each histologic component of MANEC according to its tumor vs stromal compartment using the DSP platform. Although each component of MANEC shares the same genetic origin, distinctive phenotypes should not be overlooked when managing patients with MANEC. This study provides a useful validation data set for future studies.

Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Neoplasms-A Review

ABSTRACT

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rapidly evolving small bowel tumors, and the patients are asymptomatic at the initial stages. Metastases are commonly observed at the time of presentation and diagnosis. This review addresses the small bowel NEN (SB-NEN) and its molecular, histological, and imaging features, which aid diagnosis and therapy guidance. Somatic cell number alterations and epigenetic mutations are studied to be responsible for sporadic and familial SB-NEN. The review also describes the grading of SB-NEN in addition to rare histological findings such as mixed neuroendocrine-non-NENs. Anatomic and nuclear imaging with conventional computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomographic enterography, and positron emission tomography are adopted in clinical practice for diagnosing, staging, and follow-up of NEN. Along with the characteristic imaging features of SB-NEN, the therapeutic aspects of imaging, such as peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, are discussed in this review.

Molecular Classification of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Are We Ready for That?

In the last two decades, the increasing availability of technologies for molecular analyses has allowed an insight in the genomic alterations of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) of the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. This knowledge has confirmed, supported, and informed the pathological classification of NEN, clarifying the differences between neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) and neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and helping to define the G3 NET category. At the same time, the identification genomic alterations, in terms of gene mutation, structural abnormalities, and epigenetic changes differentially involved in the pathogenesis of NEC and NET has identified potential molecular targets for precision therapy. This review critically recapitulates the available molecular features of digestive NEC and NET, highlighting their correlates with pathological aspects and clinical characteristics of these neoplasms and revising their role as predictive biomarkers for targeted therapy. In this context, the feasibility and applicability of a molecular classification of gastrointestinal and pancreatic NEN will be explored.

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms in gastroenteropancreatic tract

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are a heterogeneous group of malignant neoplasms that can settle in the gastroenteropancreatic tract. They are composed of a neuroendocrine (NE) and a non-NE component in at least 30% of each tumour. The non-NE component can include different histological combinations of glandular, squamous, mucinous and sarcomatoid phenotypes, and one or both of the components can be low-or high grade malignant. Recent changes in the nomenclature of these neoplasms might lead to great deal of confusion, and the lack of specific clinical trials is the main reason why their management is difficult. The review aims to clarify the definition of MiNEN and analyze available evidence about their diagnosis and treatment options according to their location and extension through careful analysis of the available data. It would be important to reach a general consensus on their diagnosis in order to construct a classification that remains stable over time and facilitates the design of clinical trials that, due to their low incidence, will require long recruitment periods.

Gastric mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms

The uncommon tumour known as gastric mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (G-MiNENs) is made up of parts of neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. The biological and clinical features are different from those of gastric adenocarcinoma. Their pathophysiology, diagnostic standards, and clinical behaviour have all been the subject of lengthy debates, and their nomenclature has undergone multiple changes. Its emergence has created new challenges in the classification and diagnosis of gastric tumours. This review will update information on the topic, covering molecular aspects, diagnostic criteria, treatment, and prognostic factor discovery. It will also provide a historical context that will aid in understanding the evolution of the idea and nomenclature of mixed gastric tumours. Additionally, it will provide the reader a thorough understanding of this difficult topic of cancer that is applicable to real-world situations.

Infiltrating characteristics and prognostic value of tertiary lymphoid structures in resected gastric neuroendocrine neoplasm patients

Objectives

Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) are lymphocyte aggregates that play an anti-tumor role in most solid tumors. However, the functions of TLS in gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (GNENs) remain unknown. This study aimed to determine the characteristics and prognostic values of TLS in resected GNEN patients.

Methods

Haematoxylin-eosin, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and multiple fluorescent IHC staining were used to assess TLS to investigate the correlation between TLSs and clinicopathological characteristics and its prognostic value.

Results

Tertiary lymphoid structures were identified in 84.3% of patients with GNEN. They were located in the stromal area or outside the tumor tissue and mainly composed of B and T cells. A high density of TLSs promoted an anti-tumor immune response in GNEN. CD15+ TANs and FOXP3+ Tregs in TLSs inhibited the formation of TLSs. High TLS density was significantly associated with prolonged recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of GNENs. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that TLS density, tumor size, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage and World Health Organisation (WHO) classification were independent prognostic factors for OS, whereas TLS density, tumor size and TNM stage were independent prognostic factors for RFS. Finally, OS and RFS nomograms were developed and validated, which were superior to the WHO classification and the TNM stage.

Conclusion

Tertiary lymphoid structures were mainly located in the stromal area or outside the tumor area, and high TLS density was significantly associated with the good prognosis of patients with GNEN. Incorporating TLS density into a nomogram may improve survival prediction in patients with resected GNEN.

Comparison of survival outcomes and survival prediction in patients with primary colorectal MANEC and primary colorectal SRCC: a population-based propensity-score matching study

PURPOSE

Primary mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) and primary signet-ring cell cancer (SRCC) are two rare but highly malignant tumors in colorectal cancer. Therefore, we attempted to compare the tumors' survival outcomes, identify risk factors, and ultimately evaluate the prognosis by developing a nomogram.

METHODS

We identified 755 MANEC and 5836 SRCC patients of colorectal cancer. PSM was used to balance the influence of baseline clinical and pathological differences. Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the prognosis of different pathological grades and AJCC stages. Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify potential prognostic factors for the two groups. Finally, we developed a nomogram and evaluated the feasibility of the model.

RESULTS

After PSM, the median OS and CSS of MANEC patients were significantly better than those of SRCC patients in stage III-IV (P < 0.001) but similar in stage I-II. The median OS and CSS of MANEC patients in each pathological grade were also greater than those of SRCC patients. Patients with MANEC and SRCC who underwent lymph node dissection in more than four areas had longer survival time. MANEC patients benefited from postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy; among SRCC patients, those who received preoperative and postoperative comprehensive chemotherapy and radiotherapy had benefits in OS and CSS.

CONCLUSION

Both MANEC and SRCC are often diagnosed in advanced stages, highlighting the importance of early screening. Despite the better prognosis of MANEC compared to SRCC, both types of patients require the formulation of personalized treatment strategies based on different risk factors combined with column charts.

Gastric Amphicrine Carcinoma Showing Neuroendocrine and Pancreatic Acinar Cell Differentiation. Lesson from a Challenging Case Opening New Perspectives in the Diagnostic Work-Up of Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Amphicrine carcinomas are epithelial neoplasms composed of cells with co-existing exocrine-neuroendocrine phenotype and are challenging lesions from both diagnostic and therapeutic perspectives.Here, we report the case of a 63-year-old male patient with a gastric nodule that was endoscopically biopsied, revealing histological features of a type 3 well-differentiated gastric neuroendocrine tumor (NET). At imaging, the lesion was single and limited to the stomach, but did not present In-111Octreotide uptake, despite SSTR2A immunohistochemical expression. The patient underwent a wedge resection of the gastric wall, with a final pathological diagnosis of amphicrine carcinoma with pancreatic acinar cell and neuroendocrine features (pT1b). Predictive immunohistochemistry showed microsatellite stability and negative HER2 status. Hotspot targeted deep sequencing of 57 genes showed no somatic mutation, in agreement with the low mutational burden reported for gastric amphicrine carcinomas. Due to a low stage of the tumor and the poor performance status of the patient, no additional oncological treatment was administered. The patient was disease-free after 18 months.This unusual case highlights the importance of considering amphicrine carcinoma in the diagnostic work-up of gastric type 3 NET. This can be done by including in the immunohistochemical panel non-neuroendocrine markers, such as the pancreatic acinar cell and glandular ones. Correct pathological diagnosis is pivotal to determine the appropriate staging (NET vs exocrine one) for surgical and oncological management.

Digestive MiNENs: Could histological classification and molecular characterization drive clinical outcome and therapeutic approach?

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are epithelial neoplasms in which neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine discrete components are combined, each of which constitutes ≥ 30% of the neoplasm. The finding of an additional neuroendocrine component seems to characterize the tumor's biological behavior. Few studies have proved MiNENs histogenetic and molecular characterization, and the development of molecular markers for more accurate classification of MiNENs represents a clinical need. However, a common origin of the neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components from a pluripotent cancer stem cell could be suggested. The optimal clinical management of MiNENS is largely unknown. Whenever feasible, curative-intent resection should be performed for localized disease; in advanced disease, the treatment should be targeted to the component responsible for the metastatic spreading. This paper provides a revision of the current knowledge on MiNENs, focusing on available evidence about their molecular characterization to suggest a prognostic stratification of these rare forms.

Case report: Coexistence of sigmoid tumor with unusual pathological features and multiple colorectal neuroendocrine tumors with lymph node metastases

The coexistence of adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) in the same tumor is rare. What is rarer is that the neuroendocrine component is a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET) Grade (G) 1. Most colorectal NETs are single, but multiple neuroendocrine tumors (M-NETs) are rare. Well-differentiated NETs rarely metastasize. Here, we present a unique case of a synchronous sigmoid tumor and multiple colorectal NETs with lymph node metastases. The sigmoid tumor consisted of adenocarcinoma and NET G1. The metastatic component was NET G1. A 64-year-old man underwent a colonoscopy for persistent changes in bowel habits and positive fecal occult blood for 1 year. An ulcerative lesion, which was diagnosed as colon cancer, was seen in the sigmoid colon. In addition, scattered lesions could be seen in the colon and rectum. Surgical resection was performed. Pathological findings suggested that the ulcerative lesion was composed of 80% adenocarcinoma and 20% neuroendocrine component (NET G1), while the remaining lesions were consistent with NET G1. At the same time, 11 lymph nodes around the resected intestinal segment were invaded by NET G1. The prognosis of the patient was good. After 13 months of follow-up, no recurrence and no metastasis were found. We hope to provide a reference and improve our understanding of the clinicopathological features and biological behavior of these unique tumors. We also aim to emphasize the importance of radical surgery and individualized treatment.

European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) 2023 guidance paper for digestive neuroendocrine carcinoma

This ENETS guidance paper, developed by a multidisciplinary working group, provides up-to-date and practical advice on the diagnosis and management of digestive neuroendocrine carcinoma, based on recent developments and study results. These recommendations aim to pave the road for more standardized care for our patients resulting in improved outcomes. Prognosis is generally poor for digestive NEC, most are advanced at diagnosis and median survival in metastatic disease is 11-12 months. Surgery can be of benefit for localized disease after extensive preoperative imaging. Carboplatin in combination with etoposide is recommended as first-line treatment for metastatic disease. Irinotecan with fluoropyrimidines has the best evidence as second-line treatment. Immunotherapy plays a minor role in biomarker-unselected patients. Molecular profiling if available is encouraged to identify new targets. More prospective clinical trials are highly needed to fulfil the unmet needs in this field, especially on new predictive and prognostic biomarkers and to improve survival of patients with advanced disease.

Clinicopathological characteristics of mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms in gastrointestinal tract

BACKGROUND

In 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system updated the definition of mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs), previously known as mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs). The clinicopathological characteristics of this new definition remains to be clarified.

METHODS

We analyzed the clinical data of 43 patients diagnosed with MiNENs in Wuhan Union Hospital from 2011 to 2020 according to the definition of MiNENs proposed in 2019.

RESULTS

Among the 43 patients with MiNENs, the top two most common sites were stomach and colon, and 69.8% were males. Nearly half (21/43) of the patients were diagnosed at TNM stage III, and about 53.5% (23/43) of patients were the neuroendocrine neoplasm dominant type. Among the non-neuroendocrine tumor components of 43 MiNENs patients, adenocarcinoma accounted for 95.3% (41/43) and squamous cell carcinoma accounted for 4.7% (2/43)；95.3% (41/43) of the neuroendocrine neoplasm components were neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and 4.7% (2/43) were neuroendocrine tumor (NET). Approximately 60.5% (26/43) neuroendocrine components had a Ki-67 index ≥ 55%. In addition, we further compared the prognosis of different subtypes of the MiNENs based on the neuroendocrine neoplasm component and non-neuroendocrine neoplasm component, and the results showed that there was no significant difference in survival between different subtypes of MiNENs (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

MiNENs can exhibit diverse clinicopathological characteristics, and there is no significant difference in prognosis among MiNENs subtypes, indicating that the definition of MiNENs can well summarize the prognosis of this type of tumor.

Olfactory Neuroblastoma: Morphological Reappraisal and Molecular Insights with Quantum Leap in Clinical Perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of review is to provide a comprehensive review of the literature focusing on the recent advances in the diagnosis, molecular underpinning, and targeted therapy of olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB).

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies focused on the molecular fingerprinting of ONB are critical to engage new promising treatment strategies. Molecular-based subtype classifications have been proposed (basal-like ONB and neural-like ONB) but are not widely used. The rationale for implementation of DNA methylation analysis and IDH2 sequencing in routine work-up for ONB is gaining recognition. Expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTR) in ONB open new avenues for both, diagnostic (especially metastatic disease) and new treatment protocols with somatostatin analogs. Olfactory carcinoma is proposed as a unifying diagnostic terminology pertinent to epithelial divergent differentiation in olfactory neuroblastoma. Molecular (genetic and epigenetic) efforts on olfactory neuroblastoma are promising; however further refinement is needed for employment of these biomarkers as clinical standard of care. Ongoing and future multi-institutional collaborative studies will contribute to further understanding of ONB biology and aid the development of targeted treatments for this disease.

Mixed Neuroendocrine/Non-neuroendocrine Neoplasm (MiNEN) of the Ovary Arising from Endometriosis: Molecular Pathology Analysis in Support of a Pathogenetic Paradigm

Primary ovarian neuroendocrine neoplasms (Ov-NENs) are infrequent and mainly represented by well-differentiated forms (neuroendocrine tumors - NETs - or carcinoids). Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (Ov-NECs) are exceedingly rare and only few cases have been reported in the literature. A subset of Ov-NECs are admixed with non-neuroendocrine carcinomas, as it occurs in other female genital organs, as well (mostly endometrium and uterine cervix), and may be assimilated to mixed neuroendocrine/non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) described in digestive and extra-digestive sites. Here, we present a case of large cell Ov-NEC admixed with an endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary, arising in the context of ovarian endometriosis, associated with a uterine endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH). We performed targeted next-generation sequencing analysis, along with a comprehensive immunohistochemical study and FISH analysis for TP53 locus, separately on the four morphologically distinct lesions (Ov-NEC, endometrioid carcinoma, endometriosis, and EAH). The results of our study identified molecular alterations of cancer-related genes (PIK3CA, CTNNB1, TP53, RB1, ARID1A, and p16), which were present with an increasing gradient from preneoplastic lesions to malignant proliferations, both neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components. In conclusion, our findings underscored that the two neoplastic components of this Ov-MiNEN share a substantially identical molecular profile and they progress from a preexisting ovarian endometriotic lesion, in a patient with a coexisting preneoplastic proliferation of the endometrium, genotypically and phenotypically related to the ovarian neoplasm. Moreover, this study supports the inclusion of MiNEN in the spectrum ovarian and, possibly, of all gynecological NENs, among which they are currently not classified.

Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Pancreas

Pancreatic mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are rare neoplasms, composed of at least two components. The neuroendocrine part is always present. Histology is the most important tool for the diagnosis, but in the case of MiNEN, it is also important for the use of immunohistochemistry, which should include neuroendocrine but also ductal and acinar markers. Each component should be specifically described in the final pathology report, including the percentage on the entire tumor mass. The prognosis of MiNEN is very heterogeneous and depends on the different tumor components.

Genetic alterations in gastric amphicrine carcinomas and comparison with gastric mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms

Gastric amphicrine carcinoma, in which endocrine and epithelial cell features are present within the same cells, is often confused with gastric mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN). In this study, we performed high-resolution copy number (CN) profiling and whole exome sequencing (WES) of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues from eight gastric amphicrine carcinomas and compared the molecular features with those of the adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) components of eight gastric MiNENs. The most frequent high-level CN variant was a gain of 20q13.12-20q13.2, which was found in five gastric amphicrine carcinomas. Amplifications of MYT1, NTSR1, and ZBTB46 located in this region were demonstrated by qPCR and immunohistochemistry. The CN characteristics of gastric amphicrine carcinomas were different from those of MiNENs in hierarchical clustering analysis, suggesting that amphicrine carcinoma is a separate entity from MiNEN. Moreover, the CN level of C5 (complement C5) was higher in amphicrine carcinoma than in both the adenocarcinoma and the NEC component of MiNENs, suggesting that amphicrine carcinomas might benefit more from C5 inhibitors than MiNENs. WES showed frequent somatic mutations of TP53 (37.5%, 3/8) and APC (25.0%, 2/8) in amphicrine carcinoma. There were no specific mutation characteristics to distinguish amphicrine carcinoma from MiNEN. An integrated KEGG pathway analysis showed that the estrogen signaling pathway was enriched in amphicrine carcinomas, which might be associated with the high morbidity of male patients. In summary, our study revealed the unique CN and mutation characteristics of gastric amphicrine carcinoma and differentiated these characteristics from those of MiNENs. These data provide a foundation for further studies on the development and progression of amphicrine carcinoma.

Transcription Factor Expression in Sinonasal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Olfactory Neuroblastoma (ONB): Hyams' Grades 1-3 ONBs Expand the Spectrum of SATB2 and GATA3-Positive Neoplasms

Sinonasal neuroendocrine neoplasms (SN-NENs) are rare and mostly include neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), whereas neuroendocrine tumor (NET) is exceptional in this site. Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is a malignant neuroectodermal neoplasm arising in the nasal cavity. Albeit crucial for correct patients' management, the distinction of high grade ONB from NEC is challenging and requires additional diagnostic markers. The transcription factor SATB2 has been recently introduced in routine diagnostics as an immunohistochemical marker of distal intestine differentiation. No specific data are available about SATB2 and GATA3 expression in SN-NENs. GATA3, SATB2, and, for comparison, CDX2 expression were investigated in a series of epithelial and non-epithelial SN-NENs. We collected 26 cases of ONB and 7 cases of epithelial SN-NENs diagnosed and treated in our Institution. ONBs were graded according to Hyams' system and epithelial NENs were reclassified into 5 NECs, 1 MiNEN, and 1 amphicrine carcinoma. Immunohistochemistry was performed using standard automated protocols. Hyams' grades 1-3 ONBs stained diffusely and intensely for SATB2, whereas grade 4 ONBs and NECs were globally negative. The non-neuroendocrine component of MiNEN and the amphicrine carcinoma were strongly positive. GATA3 was heterogeneously and unpredictably expressed in Hyams' grades 1-3 ONBs, whereas grade 4 ONBs and NECs were completely negative. CDX2 was negative in all cases. Our study identifies, for the first time, SATB2 and GATA3 expression as features of Hyams' grades 1-3 ONBs, expands the spectrum of SATB2 and GATA3-positive neoplasms, and suggests that Hyams' grade 4 ONBs are not only clinically but also biologically different from low graded ONBs.

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system: A mini-review

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are rare mixed tumors containing both neuroendocrine (NE) and non-NE components. Each component must occupy at least 30% of the tumor volume by definition. Recent molecular evidence suggests MiNENs are clonal neoplasms and potentially harbor targetable mutations similar to conventional carcinomas. There have been multiple changes in the nomenclature and classification of MiNENs which has created some confusion among pathologists on how to integrate the contributions of each component in a MiNEN, an issue which in turn has resulted in confusion in communication with front-line treating oncologists. This mini review summarizes our current understanding of MiNENs and outline diagnosis, prognosis, and management of these neoplasms. The authors emphasize the importance of treating the most aggressive component of the tumor regardless of its percentage volume.

Mixed Neuroendocrine Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Case Series

Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) refer to heterogenous rare neoplasms constituted of at least a neuroendocrine population—either well-differentiated, or more frequently poorly differentiated—and a non-neuroendocrine population, both accounting for at least 30% of the whole tumor mass. Several studies recently focused on the key genetic and epigenetic changes underlying MiNENs to better understand how they develop, and explore biological similarities among the two components and their pure counterparts. However, their molecular landscape still remains poorly understood. NGS may represent a useful tool to study this orphan disease by detecting the main genetic alterations and possible therapeutic targets. NGS analysis on tissue and/or blood samples through the Foundation One (F1) platform was performed on consecutive samples collected from four patients diagnosed with MiNENs of the gastroenteric tract. Several genetic alterations were shared among samples from the same patients, thus suggesting a common origin between them, although morphology sometimes changed at histopathological evaluation. Common molecular alterations among samples from different patients that had not been previously described to our knowledge were also detected. Finally, it is of the utmost importance to clarify if the maintenance of the 30% cut-off is still essential in defining MiNENs and really manages to include all of the mixed neoplasms.

An update on the development of concepts, diagnostic criteria, and challenging issues for neuroendocrine neoplasms across different digestive organs

Digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a group of heterogeneous neoplasms found throughout the digestive tract, with different behaviour and genetic background. In the last few years, nomenclature and WHO/UICC classifications of digestive NENs have changed, and molecular classifications have emerged, especially in pancreatic locations. Increasing patho-molecular details are needed to diagnose the different categories of NEN, including the use of helpful immunohistochemical markers. In this review, we address these topics in three successive chapters. We first briefly review recent updates in classifications, discuss important grading and proliferating issues and advances in the molecular understanding of NEN. Then, we provide an update on diagnosis, including the most important differential diagnoses of NEN, with a focus on high-grade neoplasms and mixed tumours. Finally, we highlight a variety of currently used and next-generation predictive and prognostic biomarkers as well as biomarkers of tumour origin and describe some site specificities of gastrointestinal NEN. We specifically focus on biomarkers available to pathologists with the potential to change the way patients with NEN are diagnosed and treated.

Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

In this review, we detail the changes and the relevant features that are applied to neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) in the 2022 WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors. Using a question-and-answer approach, we discuss the consolidation of the nomenclature that distinguishes neuronal paragangliomas from epithelial neoplasms, which are divided into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). The criteria for these distinctions based on differentiation are outlined. NETs are generally (but not always) graded as G1, G2, and G3 based on proliferation, whereas NECs are by definition high grade; the importance of Ki67 as a tool for classification and grading is emphasized. The clinical relevance of proper classification is explained, and the importance of hormonal function is examined, including eutopic and ectopic hormone production. The tools available to pathologists for accurate classification include the conventional biomarkers of neuroendocrine lineage and differentiation, INSM1, synaptophysin, chromogranins, and somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), but also include transcription factors that can identify the site of origin of a metastatic lesion of unknown primary site, as well as hormones, enzymes, and keratins that play a role in functional and structural correlation. The recognition of highly proliferative, well-differentiated NETs has resulted in the need for biomarkers that can distinguish these G3 NETs from NECs, including stains to determine expression of SSTRs and those that can indicate the unique molecular pathogenetic alterations that underlie the distinction, for example, global loss of RB and aberrant p53 in pancreatic NECs compared with loss of ATRX, DAXX, and menin in pancreatic NETs. Other differential diagnoses are discussed with recommendations for biomarkers that can assist in correct classification, including the distinctions between epithelial and non-epithelial NENs that have allowed reclassification of epithelial NETs in the spine, in the duodenum, and in the middle ear; the first two may be composite tumors with neuronal and glial elements, and as this feature is integral to the duodenal lesion, it is now classified as composite gangliocytoma/neuroma and neuroendocrine tumor (CoGNET). The many other aspects of differential diagnosis are detailed with recommendations for biomarkers that can distinguish NENs from non-neuroendocrine lesions that can mimic their morphology. The concepts of mixed neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine (MiNEN) and amphicrine tumors are clarified with information about how to approach such lesions in routine practice. Theranostic biomarkers that assist patient management are reviewed. Given the significant proportion of NENs that are associated with germline mutations that predispose to this disease, we explain the role of the pathologist in identifying precursor lesions and applying molecular immunohistochemistry to guide genetic testing.

Mixed neuroendocrine–nonneuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal system: An update

Mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) of the digestive tract are a rare heterogeneous group of tumors that present many challenges in terms of diagnosis and treatment. Over the years, the diagnostic criteria, classification, and clinical behavior of these tumors have been the subjects of ongoing debate, and the various changes in their nomenclature have strengthened the challenges associated with MiNENs. This review is performed to provide an understanding of the key factors involved in the evolution of the designation of these tumors as MiNEN, highlight the current diagnostic criteria, summarize the latest data on pathogenesis and provide information on available treatments. Moreover, this work seeks to increase the awareness about these rare neoplasms by presenting the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors that play important roles in their behavior and discussing their different regions of origin in the gastrointestinal system (GIS). Currently, the MiNEN category also includes tumors in the GIS with a nonneuroendocrine component and epithelial tumors other than adenocarcinoma, depending on the organ of origin. Diagnosis is based on the presence of both morphological components in more than 30% of the tumor. However, this value needs to be reconfirmed with further studies and may be a limiting factor in the diagnosis of MiNEN by biopsy. Furthermore, available clinicopathological data suggest that the inclusion of amphicrine tumors in the definition of MiNEN is not supportive and warrants further investigation. The diagnosis of these tumors is not solely based on immunohistochemical findings. They are not hybrid tumors and both components can act independently; thus, careful grading of each component separately is required. In addition to parameters such as the metastatic state of the tumor at the time of diagnosis and the feasibility of surgical resection, the aggressive potential of both components has paramount importance in the choice of treatment. Regardless of the organ of origin within the GIS, almost MiNENs are tumors with poor prognosis and are frequently encountered in the elderly and men. They are most frequently reported in the colorectum, where data from molecular studies indicate a monoclonal origin; however, further studies are required to provide additional support for this origin.

The classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the lung and digestive system according to WHO, 5th Edition: similarities, differences, challenges & unmet needs

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a group of disease entities sharing common morphological, ultrastructural and immunophenotypical features, yet with distinct biological behavior and clinical outcome, ranging from benign to frankly malignant. Accordingly, a spectrum of therapeutic options for each single entity is available, including somatostatin analogues (SSA), mTOR-inhibitors, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), non-platinum and platinum chemotherapy. In the last few decades, several attempts have been made in order to (1) better stratify these lesions refining the pathological classifications, so as to obtain an optimal correspondence between the scientific terminology and, the predictive and prognostic features of each disease subtype, and (2) achieve a global Classification encompassing NENs arising at different anatomical sites. Aim of this review is to analyze, compare and discuss the main features and issues of the latest WHO Classifications of NENs of the lung and the digestive system, in order to point out the strengths and limitations of our current understanding of these complex diseases.

Mixed neuroendocrine nonneuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas: a case report and literature review of pancreatic mixed neuroendocrine nonneuroendocrine neoplasm

A 36-year-old woman underwent left lateral hepatic lobectomy and tumor enucleation of the pancreatic head due to the diagnosis of mixed neuroendocrine nonneuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs). Her past medical history revealed an ill-defined mass in the pancreatic uncinate (approximately 1 cm in size) and liver nodules in segment II, suggesting a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET) and liver metastases. After the operation, pathological examination showed that the lesion in the pancreas was MiNEN. The neuroendocrine component consisted of grade 1 (G1) NETs, and the nonneuroendocrine part was well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. Additionally, in hepatic lesions, the type of pancreaticobiliary duct in moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma indicated the source of tumor cells. We present the following case in accordance with the CARE reporting checklist. MiNENs of the pancreas are extremely rare and heterogeneous malignancies. Owing to the rarity of pancreatic MiNEN, no structured guidelines on preoperative diagnostics, therapy and follow-up exist thus far. Thus, problems in differential diagnosis and appropriate therapy may arise when treating suspected MiNEN patients. We performed a rigorous search on pancreatic MiNEN via PubMed and Web of Science. In total, 167 studies were identified, and 28 cases in 15 studies about pancreatic MiNEN were assessed. All the available information was listed and fully discussed.

Case report: composite pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and neuroendocrine tumor: a new mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm?

BACKGROUND

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN) of the pancreas are extremely rare. Their pathogenesis and molecular landscape are largely unknown. Here, we report a case of mixed pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) and well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and identify its genetic alterations by next-generation sequencing (NGS).

CASE PRESENTATION

A fifty-year-old male was admitted into the hospital for evaluation of a pancreatic lesion detected during a routine examination. Abdominal ultrasound indicated a hypoechoic mass of 2.6 cm at the head of the pancreas. Malignancy was suspected and partial pancreatectomy was performed. Thorough histopathological examination revealed a mixed IPMN-NET. In some areas, the two components were relatively separated, whereas in other areas IPMN and NET grew in a composite pattern: The papillae were lined with epithelial cells of IPMN, and there were clusters of NET nests in the stroma of papillary axis. NGS revealed shared somatic mutations (KRAS, PCK1, MLL3) in both components. The patient has been uneventful 21 months after the surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our case provides evidence of a common origin for mixed IPMN-NET with composite growth features. Our result and literature review indicate that KRAS mutation might be a driver event underlying the occurrence of MiNEN. We also recommend the inclusion of mixed non-invasive exocrine neoplasms and neuroendocrine neoplasms into MiNEN.

The classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast and its clinical relevance

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the breast (Br-NENs) are rare tumors of the mammary gland. Their definition and classification have been a matter of discussion for more than half a century, as they present some degree of overlap with other malignancies in the mammary gland. The recent evolutions in the understanding of the pathogenesis of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) as well as the novel tools in the diagnostic arsenal of the pathologists, and a better correlation with clinical data, have led to improved classification schemes for these entities, beginning from those arising in digestive and thoracic organs. These new classification concepts have been recently expanded to NENs arising in every anatomical site, with the proposal of a common classification framework that has been applied in the 5th edition of the WHO classification of tumors. These concepts include the recognition of two distinct families of NENs (neuroendocrine tumors, NETs, and neuroendocrine carcinomas, NECs), the identification of mixed neuroendocrine/non-neuroendocrine neoplasms, and the application of definite morphological and immunohistochemical criteria for the diagnosis of NENs. The last WHO classification of Br-NENs, however, still seems to leave several unanswered questions and unmet needs in the understanding of diagnostic and clinical features of these entities. This review will critically revise the current classification of Br-NENs, underlining its lights and shadows and focusing on the identification of diagnostic histopathological criteria that can help the univocal recognition of Br-NET, Br-NEC, and Br-MiNEN.

When Variants Collide: An Unusual Presentation of Metastatic Gastric Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasm

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms were recently reclassified into the 2019 World Health Organization schema into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs). Among these, gastric MiNENs are exceedingly rare and often metastasize quickly without diagnostic clues. We present a refractory gastric MiNEN with unique presenting features. This case highlights the clinical spectrum of these tumors, the importance of accurate histochemical interpretation, and clinical management in the absence of formalized guidelines. Future therapies looking at novel targets and palliative symptom relief are needed.

Classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms: lights and shadows

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplastic proliferations showing different morphological features, immunophenotype, molecular background, clinical presentation, and outcome. They can virtually originate in every organ of the human body and their classification is not uniform among different sites. Indeed, as they have historically been classified according to the organ in which they primarily arise, the different nomenclature that has resulted have created some confusion among pathologists and clinicians. Although a uniform terminology to classify neuroendocrine neoplasms arising in different systems has recently been proposed by WHO/IARC, some issues remain unsolved or need to be clarified. In this review, we discuss the lights and shadows of the current WHO classifications used to define and characterize NENs of the pituitary gland, lung, breast and those of the head and neck region, and digestive and urogenital systems.

Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas of stomach and ampulla of vater after curative-intent resection: a single center cases series

Background

Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma is a rare clinical manifestation, especially in the gastric and ampullary. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological features and prognosis of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma in the gastric and ampullary and summarize related treatment suggestions.

Methods

In all, 32 cases of mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma in the gastric and ampullary that were diagnosed from resected specimens were analyzed from 2009 to 2015. The corresponding demographic, clinicopathological and survival data were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 78.1%, 28.1 and 9.4%, respectively, and the median overall survival was 28.0 months. In all, 75.0% (24/32) had lymph node metastasis at the time of initial diagnosis. A multivariate analysis revealed that TNM stage (HR 6.444 95%CI 1.477–28.121 P = 0.013), lymph nodes metastasis (HR10.617 95%CI 1.409–79.997 P = 0.022), vascular invasion (HR 5.855 95%CI 1.719–19.940 P = 0.005), grade of the adenocarcinoma component (HR 3.876 95%CI 1.451–10.357 P = 0.007) and CD56 positivity (HR 0.265 95%CI 0.100–0.705 P = 0.008) were independent predictors of overall survival.

Conclusions

Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma is an aggressive clinical entity with a poor prognosis. Taking both the neuroendocrine component and the adenocarcinoma component into consideration of optimal treatment is strongly recommended.

Primary MiNEN of the urinary bladder: an hitherto undescribed entity composed of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma with a distinct clinical behavior : Description of a case and review of the pertinent literature

Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) of the urinary bladder are very rare and can be observed in the context of mixed neuroendocrine/non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs), most frequently in association with urothelial carcinoma. Small cell NECs are far more common than large cell NECs (LCNECs), which are exceedingly rare. We describe a primary MiNEN of the urinary bladder, composed of a LCNEC and of an adenocarcinoma, in which the neuroendocrine component reached complete pathological regression after neoadjuvant M-VAC chemotherapy, whereas the non-neuroendocrine component of the tumor progressed to metastatic disease. Compared to mixed neuroendocrine/non-neuroendocrine neoplasms described in the literature until now, this appears to be a unique case that expands the spectrum of neuroendocrine neoplasia of the urinary bladder.

Challenges in High-grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Mixed Neuroendocrine/Non-neuroendocrine Neoplasms

The growth in knowledge of the pathogenesis, molecular background, and immunohistochemical profile of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) has led not only to an increased awareness of these diseases but also to several changes of the nomenclature. In particular, the concept and terminology of high-grade (grade 3) NENs and mixed neoplasms have changed considerably over the last 20 years, creating some confusion among pathologists and clinicians. The aim of this review is to elucidate the diagnostic criteria, including the most important differential diagnoses of high-grade NENs and mixed neuroendocrine/non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs). The role of the Ki67 labelling index and morphology, used to define grade 3 NENs of the digestive system and lungs, is also discussed. The evolution of the concepts and terminology of MiNENs is revised, including the most important differential diagnoses.

Genomics of High-Grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumor with High-Grade Features (G3 NET) and Neuroendocrine Carcinomas (NEC) of Various Anatomic Sites

High-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (HG-NENs) are clinically aggressive diseases, the classification of which has recently been redefined. They now include both poorly differentiated NENs (neuroendocrine carcinoma, NECs) and high proliferating well-differentiated NENs (called grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors, G3 NETs, in the digestive system). In the last decade, the "molecular revolution" that has affected all fields of medical oncology has also shed light in the understanding of HG NENs heterogeneity and has provided new diagnostic and therapeutic tools, useful in the management of these malignancies. Considering the kaleidoscopic aspects of HG NENs in various anatomical sites, this review systematically addresses the genomic landscape of such neoplasm throughout the more common thoracic and digestive locations, as well as it will consider other rare but not exceptional primary sites, including the skin, the head and neck, and the urogenital system. The revision of the available literature will then be oriented to understand the translational relevance of molecular data, by analyzing conceptual issues, clinicopathological correlations, and unmet needs in this field.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the biliary tree, liver and pancreas: a pathological approach

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreatobiliary tract and liver are a heterogeneous group that encompass a spectrum of entities with distinct morphological, biological and clinical features. Although in the various anatomical sub-sites of this region they show specific characteristics, these tumors, as a whole, share several etiological and clinical aspects. This review systematically addresses NENs arising in the extrahepatic bile ducts, gallbladder, liver and pancreas, with the principal aim of pinpointing essential diagnostic and classification issues. In addition, the section on hepatic NENs has been expanded to include metastatic disease of unknown primary site.