Diagnosis of external root resorption in teeth close and distant to zirconium implants: influence of acquisition parameters and artefacts produced during cone beam computed tomography

Influence of tube current and metal artifact reduction on the diagnosis of external cervical resorption in teeth adjacent to a dental implant in CBCT: an ex-vivo study

OBJECTIVES

This ex-vivo study aimed to assess the influence of tube current (mA) and metal artifact reduction (MAR) on the diagnosis of early external cervical resorption (EECR) in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the presence of an adjacent dental implant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-three single-rooted teeth were sectioned longitudinally and EECR was induced using a spherical drill and 5% nitric acid in 10 teeth. Each tooth was positioned in the socket of the lower right canine of a dry human mandible and CBCT scans were acquired using 90 kVp, voxel of 0.085 mm, field of view of 5 x 5 cm, and varying tube current (4, 8 or 12 mA), MAR (enabled or disabled) and implant conditions (with a zirconia implant in the socket of the lower right first premolar or without). Five oral radiologists evaluated the presence of EECR in a 5-point scale and the diagnostic values (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve - AUC, sensitivity, and specificity) were compared using multi-way Analysis of Variance (α = 0.05). Kappa test assessed intra-/inter-evaluator agreement.

RESULTS

The tube current only influenced the AUC values in the presence of the implant and when MAR disabled; in this case, 8 mA showed lower values (p<0.007). MAR did not influence the diagnostic values (p>0.05). In general, the presence of an implant reduced the AUC values (p<0.0001); sensitivity values with 8 mA and MAR disabled, and specificity values with 4 mA and MAR enabled and 8 mA regardless MAR were also decreased (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Variations in tube current and MAR were unable to improve EECR detection, which was impaired by the presence of an adjacent implant.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Increasing tube current or activating MAR tool does not improve EECR diagnosis, which is hampered by the artifacts generated by dental implants.

Impact of the spatial orientation of the patient's head, metal artifact reduction, and tube current on cone-beam computed tomography artifact expression adjacent to a dental implant: A laboratory study using a simulated surgical guide

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate image artifacts in the vicinity of dental implants in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans obtained with different spatial orientations, tube current levels, and metal artifact reduction algorithm (MAR) conditions.

Materials and Methods

One dental implant and 2 tubes filled with a radiopaque solution were placed in the posterior region of a mandible using a surgical guide to ensure parallel alignment. CBCT scans were acquired with the mandible in 2 spatial orientations in relation to the X-ray projection plane (standard and modified) at 3 tube current levels: 5, 8, and 11 mA. CBCT scans were repeated without the implant and were reconstructed with and without MAR. The mean voxel and noise values of each tube were obtained and compared using multi-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test (α=0.05).

Results

Mean voxel values were significantly higher and noise values were significantly lower in the modified orientation than in the standard orientation (P<0.05). MAR activation and tube current levels did not show significant differences in most cases of the modified spatial orientation and in the absence of the dental implant (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Modifying the spatial orientation of the head increased brightness and reduced spatial orientation noise in adjacent regions of a dental implant, with no influence from the tube current level and MAR.

Global cone-beam computed tomography adoption, usage and scan interpretation preferences of dentists and endodontists

AIM

This study investigated the adoption of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) by dentists and endodontists around the world, including their preferences in endodontic CBCT usage.

METHODOLOGY

An online questionnaire surveyed dental association members in Australia and New Zealand, and endodontic association members in Australia, Britain, Canada, Italy, New Zealand and the USA, about their CBCT training history, considerations in acquisition/interpretation, access to and usage of CBCT, preferred scan interpreter, and preferred endodontic scan settings. Data were analysed with Chi-squared, independent sample t-tests, Cochran's Q and McNemar's tests.

RESULTS

Responses from 578 endodontic specialists or postgraduates (Group E) and 185 non-endodontic dentists (Group NE) were included. Continuing professional education (CPE) was the most common source of CBCT training (69.2%). Factors considered in CBCT acquisition/interpretation included beam hardening (75.4%), radiation exposure (61.1%) and patient movement (58.3%). Group E reported higher CBCT usage (90.8%) than Group NE (45.4%, p < .001) and greater workplace access to CBCT (81.1% vs. 25.9%, p < .001). Scans were interpreted by the respondent in most workplace scans (83.3%) and externally taken scans (60.5%); Group E were significantly more likely to interpret themselves than Group NE. Small field of view (83.6%) and high resolution (86.6%) were most preferred as settings for endodontic CBCTs; Group NE were less likely to choose these settings. There were some geographic variations within Group E.

CONCLUSIONS

CBCT training was most commonly acquired via CPE. Endodontic respondents reported very high CBCT usage and access in the workplace. There are educational implications regarding CBCT limitations, appropriate applications and interpretation.

Mapping artifacts generated in a tooth adjacent to titanium and zirconia implants located in the endomass and exomass in cone beam computed tomography: an ex vivo study

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated artifact expression in a root adjacent to a dental implant located in the endomass or exomass in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

STUDY DESIGN

We placed a single titanium or zirconia implant adjacent to a premolar root in a dried human mandible and acquired CBCT scans using an OP300 Maxio and a Picasso Trio 3D unit exposing a 5x5cm field of view with the implant in the endomass or exomass (implant groups) or without an implant (control group). We measured the mean gray values (MGVs) for 8 lines of interest (LOIs) around the root canal of the premolar and compared the MGVs by analysis of variance, with significance established at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

For the OP300 Maxio scans, the MGVs of both implant groups in the endomass were lower than the MGVs of the control group. In the exomass, the titanium group had MGVs similar to the control group, but the zirconia group produced significantly lower MGVs than control and titanium groups (P <.0001), indicating the presence of hypodense artifacts. For the Picasso Trio 3D scans, the MGVs of both implant groups in the endomass were similar to the MGVs of the control group. In the exomass, the zirconia group generated lower MGVs than control and titanium groups (P <.0001), indicating hypodense artifacts.

CONCLUSIONS

When performing CBCT examination, titanium implants produce less artifact expression in the exomass, and zirconia implants have less artifact expression in the endomass.

Does the shape of the field-of-view influence the magnitude of artefacts from high-density materials in cone-beam computed tomography?

OBJECTIVE

To compare cylindrical and convex triangular field-of-views (FOVs) concerning the magnitude of artefacts from high-density materials in cone-beam CT (CBCT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Cylinders of amalgam, chromium-cobalt, titanium, and zirconia were individually placed in the anterior and posterior regions of a polymethylmethacrylate phantom and scanned using cylindrical and convex triangular FOVs of the Veraview X800 CBCT device. Using the Image J software, 15 square regions of interest (ROIs) were placed in the axial reconstruction around the middle level of the cylinder and at distances of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 cm from the centre of the cylinder. Mean grey value and standard deviation of each ROI were averaged for each distance and subtracted from the values of a control ROI to calculate the magnitude of the artefacts by the grey value mean difference (GVMD) and grey value standard deviation (GVSD). Multiway analysis of variance with Tukey post-hoc test with a significance level of 5% evaluated the effect of the shape of the FOV, position inside the FOV, high-density material, and the distance of the artefact from the material.

RESULTS

The convex triangular FOV increased the GVSD for all materials in the anterior and posterior regions at 0.5 cm compared to the cylindrical FOV (p < 0.0001). The convex triangular FOV showed greater GVMD for chromium-cobalt and zirconium in the anterior region and all materials in the posterior region at all distances (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The FOV shape influences the magnitude of artefacts from high-density materials. The convex triangular FOV showed greater artefact magnitude with variability among the high-density materials, region in the FOV, and distance from the material.

Do the number of basis images and metal artifact reduction affect the production of artifacts near and far from zirconium dental implants in CBCT?

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of the number of basis images and the metal artifact reduction (MAR) tool on the production of artifacts near and far from a zirconium implant in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CBCT scans of a mandible were acquired before and after insertion of an implant, using 450 and 720 basis images, with and without MAR activation. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the gray values of the regions of interest (ROIs) located on the cortices adjacent to the implant and at different distances from it (in the soft tissue) were calculated. The mean of the gray values was used to calculate the absolute contrast difference (ACD) between the control and implant scans.

RESULTS

In general, the number of basis images did not affect the SD and the ACD values of the buccal and lingual ROIs (p > 0.05). The implant increased the SD in the lingual cortical plate (p < 0.05). In this case, MAR activation decreased SD (p < 0.05). All ROIs located at different distances from the implant showed higher SD on scans acquired with 450 basis images (p < 0.05), regardless of MAR condition.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher number of basis images reduces the magnitude of artifacts but does not influence the image quality in bone cortical plates. MAR improves the image in the areas most affected by artifacts.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The number of basis images is known as a factor capable of influencing the image quality and radiation dose for the patient. Therefore, it is important to investigate its effect on the expression of artifacts in the CBCT images.

Influence of the exomass on the detection of simulated root fracture in cone-beam CT - an ex-vivo study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the influence of exomass-related metal artefacts on the detection of simulated vertical root fracture (VRF) in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

METHODS

20 teeth were endodontically instrumented and VRF was induced in half of them. All teeth were individually placed in an empty socket of a human mandible. Metallic materials were differently arranged in the exomass [zone outside of the field of view (FOV) but between the X-ray source and the receptor] and/or endomass (zone inside of the FOV), and CBCT scans were obtained. Four radiologists evaluated the presence of VRF using a 5-point scale. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) were compared using ANOVA. Also, the tooth of interest was replaced with a tube filled with a radiopaque solution and all CBCT scans were repeated to analyse the data objectively. Mean grey and noise values were obtained from the tube and compared using ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Mean grey values were significantly lower and noise was significantly higher when metallic materials were present in the endomass or both the exomass and endomass. Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were not influenced by the artefacts from the metallic materials irrespective of the arrangement condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Exomass-related metal artefacts did not influence the diagnosis of simulated VRF in CBCT.

Potential of a New Cone-Beam CT Software for Blooming Artifact Reduction

Abstract This study evaluated the dimensions of intraradicular posts using a new cone beam CT (CBCT) software, and verified the potential of blooming artifact reduction. Sixty-three single-rooted human teeth were shaped, obturated, prepared for intracanal post placement and distributed into three groups: G1: anatomically customized prefabricated glass fiber posts; G2: low-fusion alloy posts; G3: gold alloy posts. After post fabrication and luting with RelyX U200®, specimens were sectioned axially at 9 mm from the root apex, and markings were made on the root surfaces (X-, Y- and Z-axes). The dimensions of the original posts (control group) were measured using a digital micrometer. CBCT scans of the teeth were obtained using a PreXion 3D Elite® scanner. Posts were measured on CBCT scans using DICOM files and the e-Vol DX software. A specific filter, Blooming Artefact Reduction (BAR), was developed to analyze intracanal posts. Statistical data were evaluated using the Van de Waerden nonparametric analysis of variance and, after that, normalized data were analyzed using the Tukey test. The level of significance was set at α = 5%. The measures of the anatomical prefabricated, low-fusion alloy and gold alloy intracanal posts obtained using the e-Vol DX CBCT software and a micrometer were not significantly different (p>0.05). The use of the BAR filter of the e-Vol DX software application did not induce any dimensional differences on CBCT scans of intracanal posts when compared with measurements made with a micrometer on original posts. The use of the BAR filter eliminated blooming artifacts.

Influence of Metal Post in Adjacent Teeth in the Detection of Vertical Root Fracture Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography with Different Acquisition Parameters

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the detection of vertical root fracture (VRF) in the presence of adjacent teeth restored with a metal post and the influence of acquisition parameters (tube current and metal artifact reduction [MAR] algorithm) on this diagnostic task.

METHODS

Cone-beam computed tomographic images of 10 single-rooted teeth were acquired before and after the simulation of VRF. The acquisitions were set up to simulate different conditions regarding the presence of adjacent teeth restored with a metal post (control, 1 adjacent tooth, and both adjacent teeth), different tube currents (4, 8, and 10 mA), and the use of MAR (without MAR and with MAR). Images were assessed by 5 oral and maxillofacial radiologists using a 5-point scale for the presence of VRF. Diagnostic values were calculated and compared by 2-way analysis of variance (significance level of 5%).

RESULTS

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) values for VRF detection were affected by the presence of adjacent teeth and the variation of milliamperes. For 4 mA, when both restored teeth were present, Az values were significantly lower than the control group (P ≤ .05). In the presence of both restored teeth, 8 mA presented significantly higher Az values compared with 4 mA (P ≤ .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of both adjacent teeth restored with a metal post impairs VRF detection; however, an increase in tube current up to 8 mA may aid in this diagnostic task. Moreover, the MAR tool does not seem to be efficient in those cases.

Do the tube current and metal artifact reduction influence the diagnosis of vertical root fracture in a tooth positioned in the vicinity of a zirconium implant? A CBCT study

AIM

To evaluate the influence of the tube current and metal artifact reduction (MAR) tool on the diagnosis of vertical root fractures (VRF) in a tooth adjacent to a zirconium implant, in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.

METHODOLOGY

Thirty single-rooted teeth (15 with VRF and 15 control group) were individually positioned in a mandible, and scanned with the OP300 CBCT unit. Images were acquired using a standardized protocol: 5 × 5 cm field of view, 0.08-mm voxel size, and 90 kVp. Each tooth was scanned with and without a zirconium implant in its vicinity, using different tube currents (4 mA, 8 mA, and 10 mA) and conditions of MAR (enabled × disabled). Diagnostic values were calculated for each protocol, and compared by multi-way analysis of variance.

RESULTS

The ROC curve and sensitivity values did not differ significantly among the tube currents, regardless of the presence of the implant and MAR condition (p > 0.05). There were also no significant differences among the tube currents for the specificity values (p > 0.05); however, the specificity differed significantly between the "with implant" and "without implant" conditions, within the same MAR condition and tube current (p < 0.05). Specificity was significantly lower when the implant was present (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The presence of a zirconium implant impairs the diagnosis of VRF in teeth adjacent to the artifact-generator material. Neither the tube current nor the MAR tool is effective in improving this diagnostic task. Therefore, in this clinical scenario, the use of the lowest tube current (4 mA), without MAR activation, is recommended.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Considering that the tube current is one of the main factors that influence the radiation dose and image quality in CBCT, and that metal artifacts negatively influence the diagnosis of VRF in areas adjacent to the artifact-generator material, it is important to evaluate the effect of this energetic parameter in the diagnosis of VRF in teeth adjacent to zirconium implants.

Influence of windowing and metal artefact reduction algorithms on the volumetric dimensions of five different high-density materials: a cone-beam CT study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the influence of windowing and metal artefact reduction (MAR) algorithms on the volumetric dimensions of high-density materials using two CBCT systems.

METHODS

Four cylinders of amalgam, cobalt-chromium, gutta-percha, titanium and zirconium, were manufactured and their physical volumes (PV) were measured. A polymethyl methacrylate phantom containing the cylinders was submitted to CBCT acquisitions with Picasso Trio and OP300 units with their MAR enabled and disabled. The tomographic volume (TV) of all the cylinders was obtained by semi-automatic segmentation using two windowing adjustments: W1-large window width and upper window level; W2-narrow window width and low window level. Volumetric distortion was expressed as the difference between TV and PV. Statistics comprised intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures with Tukey post hoc test (α = 5%).

RESULTS

The ICC values ​​indicated excellent reproducibility of TV. Gutta-percha and titanium resulted in the smallest volumetric distortion. Using W1 provided less volumetric distortion for almost all experimental conditions (p < 0.05). Activating MAR algorithm of Picasso Trio underestimated gutta-percha and titanium TV (p < 0.05) and was inefficient in significantly reducing the volumetric distortion of the other materials (p > 0.05). Disabling MAR algorithm of OP300 resulted in smaller volumetric distortion for almost all experimental conditions (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The TV of gutta-percha and titanium were closer to the PV. In general, the MAR algorithms of both systems were inefficient in significantly reducing the volumetric distortion of high-density materials. We encourage the use of large window width and upper window level to evaluate high-density materials.

Magnitude of beam-hardening artifacts produced by gutta-percha and metal posts on cone-beam computed tomography with varying tube current

Purpose

This study was performed to evaluate the magnitude of artifacts produced by gutta-percha and metal posts on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans obtained with different tube currents and with or without metal artifact reduction (MAR).

Materials and Methods

A tooth was inserted in a dry human mandible socket, and CBCT scans were acquired after root canal instrumentation, root canal filling, and metal post placement with various tube currents with and without MAR activation. The artifact magnitude was assessed by the standard deviation (SD) of gray values and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at the various distances from the tooth. Data were compared using multi-way analysis of variance.

Results

At all distances, a current of 4 mA was associated with a higher SD and a lower CNR than 8 mA or 10 mA (P<0.05). For the metal posts without MAR, the artifact magnitude as assessed by SD was greatest at 1.5 cm or less (P<0.05). When MAR was applied, SD values for distances 1.5 cm or closer to the tooth were reduced (P<0.05). MAR usage did not influence the magnitude of artifacts in the control and gutta-percha groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Increasing the tube current from 4 mA to 8 mA may reduce the magnitude of artifacts from metal posts. The magnitude of artifacts arising from metal posts was significantly higher at distances of 1.5 cm or less than at greater distances. MAR usage improved image quality near the metal post, but had no significant influence farther than 1.5 cm from the tooth.

Does the metal artifact reduction algorithm activation mode influence the magnitude of artifacts in CBCT images?

Purpose

This study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of a metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm activated at different times during cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisition on the magnitude of artifacts generated by a zirconium implant.

Materials and Methods

Volumes were obtained with and without a zirconium implant in a human mandible, using the OP300 Maxio unit. Three modes were tested: without MAR, with MAR activated after acquisition, and with MAR activated before acquisition. Artifacts were assessed in terms of the standard deviation (SD) of gray values and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in 6 regions of interest with different distances (10 to 35 mm, from the nearest to the farthest) and angulations (70° to 135°) from the implant region.

Results

In the acquisitions without MAR, the regions closer to the implant (10 and 15 mm) had a higher SD and lower CNR than the farther regions. When MAR was activated (before or after), SD values did not differ among the regions (P>0.05). The region closest to the implant presented a significantly lower CNR in the acquisitions without MAR than when MAR was activated after the acquisition; however, activating MAR before the acquisition did not yield significant differences from either of the other conditions.

Conclusion

Both modes of MAR activation were effective in decreasing the magnitude of CBCT artifacts, especially when the effects of the artifacts were more noticeable.