Rate and associated factors of solifenacin add-on after tamsulosin monotherapy in men with voiding and storage lower urinary tract symptoms

Inhibition of growth and contraction in human prostate stromal cells by silencing of NUAK1 and -2, and by the presumed NUAK inhibitors HTH01-015 and WZ4003

Background: NUAKs promote myosin light chain phosphorlyation, actin organization, proliferation and suppression of cell death in non-muscle cells, which are critical for smooth muscle contraction and growth. In benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), contraction and growth in the prostate drive urethral obstruction and voiding symptoms. However, a role of NUAKs in smooth muscle contraction or prostate functions are unknown. Here, we examined effects of NUAK silencing and the presumed NUAK inhibitors, HTH01-015 and WZ4003 on contraction and growth-related functions in prostate stromal cells (WPMY-1) and in human prostate tissues. Methods: Effects of NUAK1 and -2 silencing, HTH01-015 and WZ4003 on matrix plug contraction, proliferation (EdU assay, Ki-67 mRNA), apoptosis and cell death (flowcytometry), viability (CCK-8) and actin organization (phalloidin staining) were examined in cultured WPMY-1 cells. Effects of HTH01-015 and WZ4003 on smooth muscle contraction were assessed in organ bath experirments with human prostate tissues. Results: Effects of silencing were most pronounced on proliferation and cell death, resulting in decreases of proliferation rate by 60% and 70% by silencing of NUAK1 and NUAK2 (compared to scramble siRNA-transfected controls), decreases in Ki-67 by 75% and 77%, while numbers of dead cells after silencing of NUAK1 and NUAK2 amounted to 2.8 and 4.9 fold of scramble-transfected controls. Silencing of each isoform was paralleled by reduced viability, breakdown in actin polymerization, and partial decreases in contractility (maximally 45% by NUAK1 silencing, 58% by NUAK2 silencing). Effects of silencing were mimicked by HTH01-015 and WZ4003, with numbers of dead cells amounting up to 16.1 fold or 7.8 fold with HTH01-015 or WZ4003, compared to solvent-treated controls. Using concentrations of 500 nM, neurogenic contractions of prostate tissues were inhibited partly by HTH01-015 and U46619-induced contractions were inhibited partly by HTH01-015 and WZ4003, while α₁-adrenergic and endothelin-1-induced contractions remained unaffected. Using 10 μM, inhibition of endothelin-1-induced contractions by both inhibitors and inhibition of α₁-adrenergic contractions by HTH01-015 added to effects seen by 500 nM. Conclusion: NUAK1 and -2 suppress cell death and promote proliferation in prostate stromal cells. A role in stromal hyperplasia appears possible in BPH. Effects of NUAK silencing are mimicked by HTH01-015 and WZ4003.

The use of mono- and combination drug therapy in men and women with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in the UK: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Combination drug therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) is beneficial to selected patients and recommended by guidelines. Patterns of real-world LUTS drug use, especially combination drug therapy, have not been studied extensively. Moreover, further understanding of the recent landscape is required following the introduction of the beta-3-adrenoceptor agonist mirabegron in the UK in 2013 for overactive bladder (OAB). The objective was to describe mono- and combination drug therapy use for LUTS in patients in UK clinical practice.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, descriptive, observational database study using UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD and linked databases. Men and women ≥ 18 years with a first prescription for any LUTS drug from 2014 to 2016 with ≥ 12 months continuous enrollment pre- and post-index date were included. Primary endpoints were mono- or combination drug therapy use for LUTS in male and female cohorts. Secondary endpoints were description of treatment prescribed, treatment persistence and patient demographics. Data were analyzed descriptively. Sub-cohorts were defined by drugs prescribed at index date.

RESULTS

79,472 patients (61.3% male) were included, based on index treatments. Of all men, 82.5% received any benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) drug, 25.4% any OAB drug, and 7.9% any BPO drug plus any OAB drug. As either mono- or combination drug therapy, 77.1% received an alpha-blocker, 18.9% a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor, 23.9% an antimuscarinic agent, and 2.1% mirabegron. Of all women, 94.5% received any OAB drug, 6.0% duloxetine, and 0.5% any OAB drug plus duloxetine. As either mono- or combination drug therapy, 87.7% received an antimuscarinic, and 9.7% mirabegron. In men or women receiving OAB treatment, approximately 2.5% received combination drug therapy with an antimuscarinic agent and mirabegron. For OAB drug monotherapies, mirabegron had the highest persistence in both male and female cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a better understanding of the recent landscape of LUTS drug use in UK clinical practice. It highlights potential undertreatment of storage symptoms in men with LUTS and the low use of combination OAB treatments.

A retrospective analysis comparing persistence and adherence to treatment with free- vs fixed-dose combination of an alpha blocker and an antimuscarinic agent in men with LUTS in Spain

INTRODUCTION

Combination therapy with an alpha blocker (AB) plus an antimuscarinic (AM) is recommended for men with moderate-to-severe mixed lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) when monotherapy is not effective in relieving storage symptoms. This study compared treatment persistence and adherence with an AB plus AM fixed-dose combination (FDC) vs an AB plus AM free-dose combination in men with LUTS in Spain.

METHODS

Retrospective study using the Spanish IQVIA Cegedim Electronic Medical Records database. Men prescribed AB plus AM combination therapy were included in an FDC or free-dose combination cohort based on their index treatment. Treatment persistence was the time from index date to first discontinuation of ≥1 of the two index drugs over 12 months. Adherence was measured using the fixed medication possession ratio (MPR).

RESULTS

Of 3114 patients identified, 999 were included (FDC, n = 790; free-dose combination, n = 209). Median (95% CI) persistence was longer in the FDC (125 [109-151] days) than in the free-dose combination (31 [31-36] days) cohort (hazard ratio [HR], 2.9; 95% CI, 2.4-3.4; P < .0001). The 12-month persistence rates were 31.1% (FDC cohort) and 8.9% (free-dose cohort). The mean (SD) fixed MPR was higher in the FDC cohort (48.8 [37.2]) compared with the free-dose cohort (23.1 [28.4]); more patients in the FDC cohort (34.2%) than in the free-dose cohort (10.0%) were adherent (MPR ≥ 80%). The probability of treatment persistence and adherence increased with age (>80 vs <65 years, persistence HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5-0.9]; MPR difference, 12.5), polypharmacy (persistence HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.6-0.9]; MPR difference, 10.7) and previous use of AB (persistence HR, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.7-1.0]; MPR difference, 5.7) or AB/AM combinations (persistence HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5-0.9]; MPR difference, 11.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with an AB/AM FDC is associated with better persistence and adherence vs a free-dose combination in men with LUTS in Spain.

New strategies for inhibition of non-adrenergic prostate smooth muscle contraction by pharmacologic intervention

BACKGROUND

Inhibition of prostate smooth muscle contraction by α₁ -adrenoceptor antagonists (α₁ -blockers) is a first-line medical treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Increased smooth muscle tone in the hyperplastic prostate may drive urethral obstruction, resulting in bladder outlet obstruction and voiding symptoms. However, efficacy of α₁ -blockers is limited, as non-adrenergic mediators including endothelin-1 and thromboxane A₂ (TXA₂ ) increase prostate smooth muscle tension in parallel to α₁ -adrenoceptors. This may maintain urethral obstruction despite therapy with α₁ -blockers. Consequently, future treatment options with higher efficacy need to target α₁ -adrenergic and non-adrenergic contractions simultaneouly. Recently, several compounds were reported to inhibit adrenergic or neurogenic prostate contractions, however, their effects on non-adrenergic contraction are unknown. Here, we examined effects of inhibitors for Rac-GTPase, Src family kinases (SFKs), and p21-activated kinases (PAKs) on non-adrenergic prostate contractions.

METHODS

Prostate tissues were obtained from radical prostatectomy. Contractions were studied in an organ bath. Viability of cultured stromal cells was assessed by CCK-8 assay.

RESULTS

Inhibition of α₁ -adrenergic contractions by Rac inhibitors EHT1864 (100 μM) and NSC23766 (100 μM), and SFK inhibitors AZM475721 (10 μM) and PP2 (10 μM) was confirmed by inhibition of methoxamine-induced contractions. No effects of the PAK inhibitors FRAX486 (30 μM) and IPA3 (300 μM) on α₁ -adrenergic contraction were confirmed by absent effects on methoxamine-inuced contractions. EHT1864 caused inhibition of endothelin-1- and U46619-induced contractions. EHT1864 reduced the viability of stromal cells concentration- and time-dependently. EHT1864 attenuated KCl-induced contractions of prostate strips only slightly, so that toxic effects may not account alone for inhibition of agonist-induced contractions. NSC23766 inhibited U46619-induced contractions, but not endothelin-1-induced contractions. AZM475271 had no effects on endothelin-1- or U46619-induced contractions, while PP2 inhibited U46619- but not endothelin-1-induced contractions. FRAX486 caused inhibition of U46619-induced contractions. IPA3 inhibited U46619-, but not endothelin-1-induced contractions.

CONCLUSIONS

Of all six inhibitors, EHT1864 seems to be most promising from a translational point of view, as it inhibited TXA₂ - and endothelin-1-induced besides α₁ -adrenergic prostate contractions. This reflects divergent pharmacologic profiles of EHT1864 and NSC23766, although both are Rac-GTPase inhibitors. In vivo, urodynamic effects of EHT1864 and possibly of FRAX486 may exceed those of α₁ -blockers.

Vesomni improves the quality of life in men with lower urinary tract symptoms in routine clinical practice in Europe

Aim

To evaluate the impact of Vesomni/Urizia/Volutsa, a fixed‐dose combination tablet containing 6 mg solifenacin (antimuscarinic) and 0.4 mg tamsulosin (α‐blocker), on health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) and treatment satisfaction in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in routine clinical practice.

Methods

EUROPA was a noninterventional study of men with LUTS/BPH not responding to monotherapy who were prescribed Vesomni in routine clinical practice. Data were collected retrospectively (1 year) and prospectively (1 year). Assessments were performed at baseline, weeks 4 to 8, weeks 9 to 18 (optional), weeks 19 to 39 (optional), and Weeks 40 to 52. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in HRQoL, as assessed by the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB‐q) symptom bother subscale score. Change from baseline in OAB‐q total and coping, sleep, and social interaction subscale scores, treatment satisfaction‐visual analog scale (TS‐VAS), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and European Quality of Life 5‐Dimension‐5‐Level (EQ‐5D‐5L) questionnaire were also evaluated.

Results

Five hundred and eighty‐nine patients were enrolled. The mean changes in adjusted mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) OAB‐q symptom bother subscale scores were −16.40 (−24.31, −8.49) at weeks 4 to 8 and −19.59 (−28.26, −10.92) at weeks 40 to 52; at weeks 40 to 52, changes were clinically meaningful in 84.6% of patients. Adjusted mean (95% CI) change from baseline to weeks 40 to 52 were 15.02 (7.35, 22.69), 19.37 (10.86, 27.89), 18.65 (7.44, 29.86), 9.85 (3.90, 15.81), and 16.09 (9.07, 23.11) for concern, coping, sleep, social interaction, and total, respectively. TS‐VAS, IPSS, and EQ‐5D‐5L all improved, and treatment persistence at weeks 40 to 52 was 77.1%. Urinary retention was reported in four (0.7%) patients.

Conclusions

Vesomni was well‐tolerated and improved HRQoL and treatment satisfaction in patients with LUTS/BPH.

Inhibition of human prostate smooth muscle contraction by the LIM kinase inhibitors, SR7826 and LIMKi3

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In men with benign prostatic hyperplasia, increased smooth muscle tone in the prostate may lead to bladder outlet obstruction and subsequent lower urinary tract symptoms. Consequently, medical treatment aims to inhibit prostate smooth muscle contraction. However, the efficacy of the treatment options available is limited, and improved understanding of mechanisms of prostate smooth muscle contraction and identification of new targets for medical intervention are mandatory. Several studies suggest that LIM kinases (LIMKs) promote smooth muscle contraction; however, this has not yet been examined. Here, we studied effects of the LIMK inhibitors on prostate smooth muscle contraction.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Human prostate tissues were obtained from radical prostatectomy. Phosphorylation of cofilin, a LIMK substrate, was examined using a phospho-specific antibody. Smooth muscle contractions were studied in organ bath experiments.

KEY RESULTS

Real-time PCR, Western blot and immunofluorescence suggested LIMKs are expressed in smooth muscle cells of prostate tissues. Two different LIMK inhibitors, SR7826 (1 μM) and LIMKi3 (1 μM), inhibited contractions of prostate strips, which were induced by electrical field stimulation, α₁ -adrenoceptor agonists phenylephrine and methoxamine and the TXA₂ analogue, U46619. LIMK inhibition in prostate tissues and cultured stromal cells (WPMY-1) was confirmed by cofilin phosphorylation, which was reduced by SR7826 and LIMKi3. In WPMY-1 cells, SR7826 and LIMKi3 caused breakdown of actin filaments and reduced viability.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Smooth muscle tone in the hyperplastic human prostate may underlie the effects of LIMKs, which promote contraction. Contraction of prostate strips can be inhibited by small molecule LIMK inhibitors.

Non-Adrenergic, Tamsulosin-Insensitive Smooth Muscle Contraction is Sufficient to Replace α1 -Adrenergic Tension in the Human Prostate

BACKGROUND

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia may be caused by prostate smooth muscle contraction. Although α₁ -blockers may improve symptoms by prostate smooth muscle relaxation, their efficacy is limited. This may be explained by non-adrenergic mediators causing contraction in parallel to α₁ -adrenoceptors. However, little is known about the relevance and cooperative actions of non-adrenergic mediators in the prostate.

METHODS

Prostate tissues were obtained from radical prostatectomy (n = 127 patients). Contractile responses were studied in an organ bath.

RESULTS

Endothelin-1 and noradrenaline induced contractions of similar magnitude (116 ± 23 and 117 ± 18% of KCl-induced contractions). Endothelin-2- and -3-induced maximum contractions of 63 ± 8.6 and 71 ± 19% of KCl, while contractions by the thromboxane analog U46619 amounted up to 63 ± 9.4%. Dopamine-induced contractions averaged to 22 ± 4.5% of KCl, while maximum contractions by serotonin, histamine, and carbachol stayed below 10% of KCl-induced. While noradrenaline-induced contractions were inhibited by tamsulosin (300 nM), endothelin-1-, -2-, or -3-induced contraction were not. No additive effects were observed if endothelins and noradrenaline were applied consecutively to the same samples. If endothelin-1 was applied after U46619, resulting tension (172 ± 43% of KCl) significantly exceeded noradrenaline-induced contraction. Tensions following combined application of endothelin-2 or -3 with U46619 stayed below noradrenaline-induced contractions. Tension following combined application of all three endothelins with U46619 resembled maximum noradrenaline-induced tone.

CONCLUSIONS

Contractions following concomitant confrontation of human prostate tissue with noradrenaline and endothelin-1 are not additive. Endothelin-1 is sufficient to induce a smooth muscle tone resembling that of noradrenaline. This may replace lacking α₁ -adrenergic tone under therapy with α₁ -blockers, explaining the limited efficacy of α₁ -blockers in LUTS treatment. Contractions by thromboxane and endothelin-1 may be additive, and may exceed α₁ -adrenergic tone. Prostate 77:697-707, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

P21-Activated Kinase Inhibitors FRAX486 and IPA3: Inhibition of Prostate Stromal Cell Growth and Effects on Smooth Muscle Contraction in the Human Prostate

Prostate smooth muscle tone and hyperplastic growth are involved in the pathophysiology and treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Available drugs are characterized by limited efficacy. Patients' adherence is particularly low to combination therapies of 5α-reductase inhibitors and α1-adrenoceptor antagonists, which are supposed to target contraction and growth simultaneously. Consequently, molecular etiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and new compounds interfering with smooth muscle contraction or growth in the prostate are of high interest. Here, we studied effects of p21-activated kinase (PAK) inhibitors (FRAX486, IPA3) in hyperplastic human prostate tissues, and in stromal cells (WPMY-1). In hyperplastic prostate tissues, PAK1, -2, -4, and -6 may be constitutively expressed in catecholaminergic neurons, while PAK1 was detected in smooth muscle and WPMY-1 cells. Neurogenic contractions of prostate strips by electric field stimulation were significantly inhibited by high concentrations of FRAX486 (30 μM) or IPA3 (300 μM), while noradrenaline- and phenylephrine-induced contractions were not affected. FRAX486 (30 μM) inhibited endothelin-1- and -2-induced contractions. In WPMY-1 cells, FRAX486 or IPA3 (24 h) induced concentration-dependent (1-10 μM) degeneration of actin filaments. This was paralleled by attenuation of proliferation rate, being observed from 1 to 10 μM FRAX486 or IPA3. Cytotoxicity of FRAX486 and IPA3 in WPMY-1 cells was time- and concentration-dependent. Stimulation of WPMY-1 cells with endothelin-1 or dihydrotestosterone, but not noradrenaline induced PAK phosphorylation, indicating PAK activation by endothelin-1. Thus, PAK inhibitors may inhibit neurogenic and endothelin-induced smooth muscle contractions in the hyperplastic human prostate, and growth of stromal cells. Targeting prostate smooth muscle contraction and stromal growth at once by a single compound is principally possible, at least under experimental conditions.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of tolterodine 2 mg and 4 mg combined with an α-blocker in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and overactive bladder: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose (2 mg) tolterodine extended release (ER) with an α-blocker compared with standard-dose (4 mg) tolterodine ER with an α-blocker for the treatment of men with residual storage symptoms after α-blocker monotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was a 12-week, single-blind, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial that included men with residual storage symptoms despite receiving at least 4 weeks of α-blocker treatment. Inclusion criteria were total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥12, IPSS quality-of-life item score ≥3, and ≥8 micturitions and ≥2 urgency episodes per 24 h. The primary outcome was change in the total IPSS score from baseline. Bladder diary variables, patient-reported outcomes and safety were also assessed.

RESULTS

Patients were randomly assigned to addition of either 2 mg tolterodine ER (n = 47) or 4 mg tolterodine ER (n = 48) to α-blocker therapy for 12 weeks. Patients in both treatment groups had a significant improvement in total IPSS score (-5.5 and -6.3, respectively), micturition per 24 h (-1.3 and -1.7, respectively) and nocturia per night (-0.4 and -0.4, respectively). Changes in IPSS, bladder diary variables, and patient-reported outcomes were not significantly different between the treatment groups. All interventions were well tolerated by patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that 12 weeks of low-dose tolterodine ER add-on therapy is similar to standard-dose tolterodine ER add-on therapy in terms of efficacy and safety for patients experiencing residual storage symptoms after receiving α-blocker monotherapy.