1
|
Evaluation of the effectiveness of long-acting insulin analogs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Public Health (Oxf) 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s10389-022-01769-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
2
|
Edina BC, Tandaju JR, Wiyono L. Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart (IDegAsp) in Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2022; 14:e25612. [PMID: 35784980 PMCID: PMC9249063 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.25612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a prevalent metabolic disease requiring tight glycemic control of basal and postprandial glucose levels. Treatment intensification using separate basal and bolus injections increased the number of injections and reduced cost-effectivity, leading to decreased compliance and failure of glycemic control. Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart (IDegAsp), a novel premix of basal and bolus insulin, is one of the potential treatments for reducing the number of injections. However, its efficacy and safety have not been reviewed clearly. Therefore, this systematic review aims to compare the efficacy and safety of IDegAsp with standard basal and basal plus bolus insulin regimens. A systematic review of four databases (Pubmed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Proquest) was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Search results were screened by eligibility criteria and critically appraised by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) tool and the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool. Meta-Analysis was done using Review Manager to obtain cumulative outcomes from hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) changes, hypoglycemia incidents, and weight gain from all studies. Out of 132 search results, 10 studies were reviewed. IDegAsp once-daily administration was proven beneficial in reducing HbA1c levels and nocturnal hypoglycemia incidences, while IDegAsp twice-daily administration was proven beneficial in lowering hypoglycemia incidence and nocturnal hypoglycemia incidence. IDegAsp yielded better glycemic index results and lowered hypoglycemic incidents in the meta-analysis. Thus, it is concluded that IDegAsp once daily with stepwise titration on the largest meal of the day achieved most benefits with minimal risks.
Collapse
|
3
|
Aravind SR, Singh KP, Aquitania G, Mogylnytska L, Zalevskaya AG, Matyjaszek-Matuszek B, Wernicke-Panten K, Nguyên-Pascal ML, Pierre S, Rotthaeuser B, Kramer D, Mukherjee B. Biosimilar Insulin Aspart Premix SAR341402 Mix 70/30 Versus Originator Insulin Aspart Mix 70/30 (NovoMix 30) in People with Diabetes: A 26-Week, Randomized, Open-Label Trial (GEMELLI M). Diabetes Ther 2022; 13:1053-1071. [PMID: 35420397 PMCID: PMC9008602 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-022-01255-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study compared the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of biosimilar insulin aspart premix SAR341402 Mix 70/30 (SARAsp-Mix) with European-approved insulin aspart mix 70/30 - NovoMix® 30 (NN-Mix) in people with type 1 (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS This 26-week, open-label, phase 3 trial enrolled 402 people with T1D (n = 105) or T2D (n = 297) previously treated with premix insulin, who were randomized (1:1) to SARAsp-Mix (n = 204) or NN-Mix (n = 198). RESULTS After 26 weeks, the least squares (LS) mean [median] change in HbA1c from baseline was similar in both treatment groups (SARAsp-Mix - 0.55% [- 0.60%]; NN-Mix - 0.64% [- 0.60%]). The LS mean difference for SARAsp-Mix versus NN-Mix was 0.08%, with the upper bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (- 0.139 to 0.303) slightly above the prespecified noninferiority margin of 0.3%. Noninferiority of SARAsp-Mix over NN-Mix was not demonstrated in the primary intent-to-treat analysis, primarily because of one extreme outlying value impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic in the SARAsp-Mix group. Noninferiority was achieved in all secondary analyses, including prespecified per-protocol supportive and COVID-19 sensitivity analyses, as well as post hoc sensitivity analyses. Other efficacy endpoints, insulin dosages, anti-insulin aspart antibody response, hypoglycemia, and adverse events were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS The totality of evidence indicates that SARAsp-Mix provides effective glycemic control with a similar safety and immunogenicity profile to NN-Mix in people with diabetes treated for 26 weeks. TRIAL REGISTRATION EudraCT number 2017-000092-84.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S R Aravind
- Diabetes Care and Research Center, Diacon Hospital, Bangalore, India
- Columbia Asia Hospital, Bangalore, India
| | - Kiran P Singh
- Department of Endocrinology, Fortis Hospital Mohali, Chandigarh, India
| | | | | | - Alsu G Zalevskaya
- Department of Endocrinology, First Pavlov State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | | | | | | | - Suzanne Pierre
- Sanofi-Aventis Research and Development, Chilly-Mazarin, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kovil R. Comparing time to intensification between insulin degludec/insulin aspart and insulin glargine: A single-center experience from India. JOURNAL OF DIABETOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.4103/jod.jod_20_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
5
|
Kapitza C, Nosek L, Schmider W, Teichert L, Mukherjee B, Nowotny I. A single-dose euglycaemic clamp study in two cohorts to compare the exposure of SAR341402 (insulin aspart) Mix 70/30 with US- and European-approved versions of insulin aspart Mix 70/30 and SAR341402 rapid-acting solution in subjects with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2021; 23:674-681. [PMID: 33236518 PMCID: PMC7898688 DOI: 10.1111/dom.14260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
AIM To compare the pharmacokinetic exposure of SAR341402 Mix 70/30 (SARAsp -Mix) with US- and European (EU)-approved versions of insulin aspart Mix 70/30 (NovoLog Mix 70/30 [NN-Mix-US]/NovoMix 30 [NN-Mix-EU]) and SAR341402 insulin aspart solution (SAR-Asp) in subjects with type 1 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial in two cohorts. Fifty-two subjects received a single subcutaneous 0.3 U/kg dose of each treatment and underwent a euglycaemic clamp procedure lasting for a maximum of 24 hours after dosing. In cohort 1, subjects (N = 36) were exposed once each to SARAsp -Mix, NN-Mix-US and NN-Mix-EU. In cohort 2, subjects (N = 16) were exposed once each to SARAsp -Mix and SAR-Asp. RESULTS Of the 52 subjects randomized, 48 completed all treatment periods. In cohort 1, the extent of exposure (total and maximum concentration) was similar among the three treatments, with the 90% confidence intervals for pairwise treatment ratios meeting the predefined acceptance range (0.80 to 1.25). In cohort 2, statistically significant differences (P < .001) in early (0-4 hours) and intermediate (4-12 hours) exposure to SARAsp -Mix compared with SAR-Asp were observed, all exceeding a 20% difference. Pharmacodynamic results were in support of the pharmacokinetic findings for both cohorts. All treatments were well tolerated and there were no relevant differences in safety variables among treatments. CONCLUSIONS SARAsp -Mix showed similar pharmacokinetic exposure to commercially available insulin aspart Mix 70/30 formulations, and a distinct exposure profile compared with SAR-Asp.
Collapse
|
6
|
Demir T, Turan S, Unluhizarci K, Topaloglu O, Tukek T, Gogas Yavuz D. Use of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus: Expert Panel Recommendations on Appropriate Practice Patterns. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 12:616514. [PMID: 33776914 PMCID: PMC7996092 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.616514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) is a fixed-ratio co-formulation of insulin degludec (IDeg), which provides long-lasting basal insulin coverage, and insulin aspart (IAsp), which targets post-prandial glucose. This expert panel aimed to provide a practical and implementable guidance document to assist clinicians in prescribing IDegAsp in the diabetes management with respect to different patient populations including children and adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) as well as pregnant, elderly and hospitalized patients and varying practice patterns (insulin-naive, insulin-treated, switching from basal, basal bolus and premix regimens). The experts recommended that IDegAsp can be used in insulin-naive T2D patients with poor glycemic control (HbA1c >8.5%) despite optimal oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) as well as in insulin-treated T2D patients by switching from basal insulin, basal-bolus therapy or premixed insulins in relation to lower risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia, fewer injections and lower intraday glycemic variability, respectively. The experts considered the use of IDegAsp in children with T2D as a basal bolus alternative rather than as an alternative to basal insulin after metformin failure, use of IDegAsp in adult T1D patients as a simplified basal bolus regimen with lesser nocturnal hypoglycemia, fewer injections and better fasting plasma glucose control and in children with T1D as an alternative insulin regimen with fewer injection to increase treatment adherence. The proposed expert opinion provides practical information on use of IDegAsp in different patient populations and practice patterns to assist clinicians, which seems to compensate the need for easily implementable guidance on this novel insulin regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tevfik Demir
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Serap Turan
- Department Pediatric Endocrinology, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Kursad Unluhizarci
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - Oya Topaloglu
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Tufan Tukek
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Dilek Gogas Yavuz
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
- *Correspondence: Dilek Gogas Yavuz,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mehta R, Chen R, Hirose T, John M, Kok A, Lehmann R, Unnikrishnan AG, Yavuz DG, Fulcher G. Practical use of insulin degludec/insulin aspart in a multinational setting: beyond the guidelines. Diabetes Obes Metab 2020; 22:1961-1975. [PMID: 32618405 PMCID: PMC7689716 DOI: 10.1111/dom.14128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) is a fixed-ratio co-formulation of insulin degludec, which provides long-lasting basal insulin coverage, and insulin aspart, which targets postprandial glycaemia. This review provides expert opinion on the practical clinical use of IDegAsp, including: dose timings relative to meals, when and how to intensify treatment from once-daily (OD) to twice-daily (BID) dose adjustments, and use in special populations (including hospitalized patients). IDegAsp could be considered as one among the choices for initiating insulin treatment, preferential to starting on basal insulin alone, particularly for people with severe hyperglycaemia and/or when postprandial hyperglycaemia is a major concern. The recommended starting dose of IDegAsp is 10 units with the most carbohydrate-rich meal(s), followed by individualized dose adjustments. Insulin doses should be titrated once weekly in two-unit steps, guided by individualized fasting plasma glucose targets and based on patient goals, preferences and hypoglycaemia risk. Options for intensification from IDegAsp OD are discussed, which should be guided by HbA1c, prandial glucose levels, meal patterns and patient preferences. Recommendations for switching to IDegAsp from basal insulin, premixed insulins OD/BID, and basal-plus/basal-bolus regimens are discussed. IDegAsp can be co-administered with other antihyperglycaemic drugs; however, sulphonylureas frequently need to be discontinued or the dose reduced, and the IDegAsp dose may need to be decreased when sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are added. Considerations around the initiation or continuation of IDegAsp in hospitalized individuals are discussed, as well as in those undergoing medical procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roopa Mehta
- Unidad de Investigación en Enfermedades Metabólicas, Departamento de Endocrinología y MetabolismoInstituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador ZubiránMexico CityMexico
| | - Roger Chen
- Department of EndocrinologySt Vincentʼs HospitalSydneyAustralia
- University of New South Wales, Office of Medical EducationUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
| | - Takahisa Hirose
- Division of Diabetes, Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of MedicineToho University School of MedicineTokyoJapan
| | - Mathew John
- Providence Endocrine and Diabetes Specialty CentreThiruvananthapuramKeralaIndia
| | - Adri Kok
- Netcare Union and Clinton HospitalsAlbertonSouth Africa
- University of WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
| | - Roger Lehmann
- Department of EndocrinologyUniversity Hospital ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | | | - Dilek Gogas Yavuz
- Department of Endocrinology and MetabolismMarmara University School of MedicineIstanbulTurkey
| | - Gregory Fulcher
- Northern Clinical SchoolUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
- Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology & MetabolismRoyal North Shore Hospital, University of SydneySydneyAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Glastras SJ, Cohen N, Dover T, Kilov G, MacIsaac RJ, McGill M, Fulcher GR. The Clinical Role of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart in Type 2 Diabetes: An Empirical Perspective from Experience in Australia. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9041091. [PMID: 32290465 PMCID: PMC7230791 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9041091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment intensification in people with type 2 diabetes following failure of basal insulin commonly involves the addition of a rapid-acting insulin analogue (basal plus one or more prandial doses; multiple daily injections) or by a switch to premixed insulin. Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp), comprising rapid-acting insulin aspart and ultra-long-acting insulin degludec in solution, enables both fasting and post-prandial glucose control, with some advantages over other treatment intensification options. These include straightforward dose titration, flexibility in dose timing, low injection burden, simplicity of switching and a lower risk of hypoglycaemia. In Australia, where insulin degludec on its own is not available, IDegAsp enables patients to still benefit from its ultra-long-acting properties. This review aims to provide guidance on where and how to use IDegAsp. Specifically, guidance is included on the initiation of IDegAsp in insulin-naïve patients, treatment intensification from basal insulin, switching from premixed or basal-bolus insulin to IDegAsp, up-titration from once- to twice-daily IDegAsp and the use of IDegAsp in special populations or situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah J. Glastras
- Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, The Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, Reserve Road, St Leonards NSW 2065, Australia;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-2-9463-1680
| | - Neale Cohen
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, 75 Commercial Road, Melbourne VIC 3004, Australia;
| | - Thomas Dover
- Ipswich Hospital, University of Queensland, Chelmsford Avenue, Ipswich QLD 4305, Australia;
- Mater Hospital Brisbane, Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane QLD 4101, Australia
| | - Gary Kilov
- Launceston Diabetes Clinic, 247 Wellington Street, Launceston TAS 7250, Australia;
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Melbourne, 230 Gratton Street, Parkville VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Richard J. MacIsaac
- Department of Endocrinology & Diabetes, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, 41 Victoria Parade, Fitzroy VIC 3065, Australia;
| | - Margaret McGill
- Diabetes Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney NSW 2050, Australia;
| | - Greg R. Fulcher
- Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, The Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, Reserve Road, St Leonards NSW 2065, Australia;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Özçelik S, Çelik M, Vural A, Aydın B, Özçelik M, Gozu H. Outcomes of transition from premixed and intensive insulin therapies to insulin aspart/degludec co-formulation in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a real-world experience. Arch Med Sci 2020; 17:1-8. [PMID: 33488849 PMCID: PMC7811302 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2020.93264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transition from premixed and intensive insulin to twice-daily insulin degludec/aspart (IDegAsp) co-formulation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this 12-week study, patients receiving twice-daily premixed insulin therapy in group 1 (n = 55) were switched to twice-daily IDegAsp. In group 2 (n = 60), patients on intensive insulin therapy were switched to IDegAsp injected twice a day. Inter- and intragroup comparisons were made. RESULTS A total of 115 patients were included in the study. There was a significant improvement in glycaemic control, median daily total insulin dose, body mass, body mass index, and hypoglycaemic events in group 1 and group 2 with the switch to IDegAsp (p < 0.05). The decrease in median daily total insulin dose requirement in group 2 was higher than that of group 1 (p = 0.001). There was no difference between groups in terms of other parameters (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The current analysis indicates that IDegAsp treatment improves outcomes, with the most notable differences observed in daily total insulin requirement, body mass, and hypoglycaemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serhat Özçelik
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Adıyaman Training and Research Hospital, Adıyaman, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Çelik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Antalya Kepez State Hospital, Kepez, Turkey
| | - Aşkı Vural
- Division of Internal Medicine, Adıyaman Training and Research Hospital, Adıyaman, Turkey
| | - Bünyamin Aydın
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Adıyaman Training and Research Hospital, Adıyaman, Turkey
| | - Melike Özçelik
- Department of Internal Diseases, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Hulya Gozu
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Marmara University Training and Research Hospital, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tien K, Hung Y, Chen J, Chen C, Wang C, Hwu C, Huang Y, Hsiao P, Tu S, Wang C, Sheu WH. Basal insulin therapy: Unmet medical needs in Asia and the new insulin glargine in diabetes treatment. J Diabetes Investig 2019; 10:560-570. [PMID: 30520564 PMCID: PMC6497775 DOI: 10.1111/jdi.12984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2018] [Revised: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 12/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Diabetes remains a global epidemic and a tremendous health challenge, especially in the Asian population. Dramatic increases in the prevalence of diabetes across different countries or areas in Asia have been reported in recent epidemiological studies. Although clinical guidelines have strengthened appropriate antihyperglycemic medications and lifestyle modifications for optimal diabetes management, inadequate glycemic control still occurs in many patients with an increased risk of developing microvascular and macrovascular complications. Insulin administration is the main therapy for diabetes in response to the inability to secrete insulin, and is recommended in current guidelines to treat patients with type 2 diabetes after failure of oral antidiabetic drugs. Clinical studies have shown that long-acting insulin analogs improve basal glycemic control with reduced risk of hypoglycemia. In the present review, we discuss previous challenges with basal insulin therapy in Asia, the pharmacological development of insulin analogs to overcome the unmet medical needs and recent clinical studies of the new ultra-long-acting insulin analog, insulin glargine U300. Furthermore, relevant findings of current real-world evidence are also included for the comparison of the efficacy and safety of different insulin formulations. Based on the accumulating evidence showing a low incidence of hypoglycemia and technical benefits of dose titration, treatment with glargine U300 can be a promising strategy for Asian diabetes patients to achieve glycemic targets with favorable safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai‐Jen Tien
- Division of Endocrinology and MetabolismDepartment of Internal MedicineChi Mei Medical CenterTainanTaiwan
| | - Yi‐Jen Hung
- Tri‐Service General HospitalSong‐Shan BranchTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Jung‐Fu Chen
- Division of MetabolismDepartment of Internal MedicineKaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial HospitalChang Gung University College of MedicineKaohsiungTaiwan
| | - Ching‐Chu Chen
- Division of Endocrinology and MetabolismDepartment of Internal MedicineChina Medical University HospitalTaichungTaiwan
- School of Chinese MedicineChina Medical UniversityTaichungTaiwan
| | - Chih‐Yuan Wang
- Division of Endocrinology and MetabolismDepartment of Internal MedicineNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Chii‐Min Hwu
- Section of Endocrinology and MetabolismDepartment of MedicineTaipei Veterans General HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Yu‐Yao Huang
- Division of Endocrinology and MetabolismDepartment of Internal MedicineChang Gung Memorial HospitalCollege of MedicineChang Gung UniversityTaoyuan CityTaiwan
| | - Pi‐Jung Hsiao
- Divisions of Endocrinology and MetabolismDepartment of Internal MedicineKaohsiung Medical University HospitalKaohsiungTaiwan
- Departments of Internal Medicine College of MedicineKaohsiung Medical UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan
| | - Shih‐Te Tu
- Division of Endocrinology and MetabolismDepartment of Internal MedicineChanghua Christian HospitalChanghuaTaiwan
| | - Chao‐Hung Wang
- Division of Endocrinology and MetabolismDepartment of Internal MedicineMacKay Memorial HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Wayne Huey‐Herng Sheu
- Division of Endocrinology and MetabolismDepartment of Internal MedicineTaichung Veterans General HospitalTaichungTaiwan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fulcher G, Mehta R, Fita EG, Ekelund M, Bain SC. Efficacy and Safety of IDegAsp Versus BIAsp 30, Both Twice Daily, in Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Post Hoc Analysis of Two Phase 3 Randomized Controlled BOOST Trials. Diabetes Ther 2019; 10:107-118. [PMID: 30474818 PMCID: PMC6349271 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-018-0531-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The majority of elderly patients (≥ 65 years of age) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) will eventually require insulin therapy, but they are particularly vulnerable to hypoglycemia and challenging to treat. Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) is a novel co-formulation of 70% insulin degludec and 30% insulin aspart administered in a single injection, either once or twice daily with main meals. METHODS A combined analysis of the phase 3 BOOST INTENSIFY PREMIX I (NCT01009580) and BOOST INTENSIFY ALL (NCT01059812) trials has previously reported lower rates of hypoglycemia during the maintenance period in patients with T2DM treated with IDegAsp twice daily (BID) versus biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) BID. This post hoc analysis examined the safety and efficacy of IDegAsp versus BIAsp 30 in elderly patients from the global population of these two trials, and also from the Japanese cohort of BOOST INTENSIFY ALL. RESULTS Change in HbA1c was similar for IDegAsp versus BIAsp 30 (p > 0.5). Compared with BIAsp 30, IDegAsp resulted in significant reductions in fasting plasma glucose (p < 0.0001), numerically lower rates of overall and nocturnal hypoglycemia (global estimated rate ratios: 0.92 [0.67; 1.26]95% confidence interval [CI], p = 0.5980 and 0.67 [0.39; 1.18]95% CI, p = 0.1676, respectively), and a significantly lower total daily insulin dose at end of trial (global estimated treatment difference 0.79 [0.73; 0.87]95% CI, p < 0.0001) in elderly patients. CONCLUSION The results described here are consistent with those of the overall trial populations, demonstrating that IDegAsp BID is efficacious in elderly patients and suggesting that there is no need for special safety precautions. FUNDING Novo Nordisk. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT01009580 and NCT01059812. Plain language summary available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greg Fulcher
- Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Roopa Mehta
- Unidad de Investigación en Enfermedades Metabólicas, Departamento de Endocrinología y Metabolismo, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | - Stephen C Bain
- Diabetes Research Unit Cymru, Swansea University, ABM University Health Board, Swansea, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
|
13
|
Russell‐Jones D, Pouwer F, Khunti K. Identification of barriers to insulin therapy and approaches to overcoming them. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018; 20:488-496. [PMID: 29053215 PMCID: PMC5836933 DOI: 10.1111/dom.13132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2017] [Revised: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 10/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Poor glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a global problem despite the availability of numerous glucose-lowering therapies and clear guidelines for T2D management. Tackling clinical or therapeutic inertia, where the person with diabetes and/or their healthcare providers do not intensify treatment regimens despite this being appropriate, is key to improving patients' long-term outcomes. This gap between best practice and current level of care is most pronounced when considering insulin regimens, with studies showing that insulin initiation/intensification is frequently and inappropriately delayed for several years. Patient- and physician-related factors both contribute to this resistance at the stages of insulin initiation, titration and intensification, impeding achievement of optimal glycaemic control. The present review evaluates the evidence and reasons for this delay, together with available methods for facilitation of insulin initiation or intensification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Russell‐Jones
- Department of Diabetes and EndocrinologyRoyal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation TrustGuildfordUK
| | - Frans Pouwer
- Department of PsychologyUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
| | - Kamlesh Khunti
- College of Medicine, Biological Sciences and Psychology, Leicester Diabetes CentreUniversity of LeicesterUK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hirose T, Awata T, Yamamoto Y, Hemmingsen MP. Clinical considerations for use of insulin degludec/insulin aspart in Japanese patients. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2017; 18:77-85. [PMID: 29017373 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2018.1389888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Co-formulation of basal and bolus insulin components provides a simpler regimen for patients with type 2 diabetes than separate basal-bolus treatment. However, conventional premixed insulin products include a suboptimal protaminated basal component that requires resuspension prior to injection. Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) is the first soluble co-formulation of a basal insulin with an ultra-long duration of action (IDeg) and a rapid-acting bolus insulin (IAsp) in a single injection. AREAS COVERED In this review, the authors summarize findings from pre-clinical studies and the clinical trial program and provide guidance for the initiating and switching of IDegAsp in different patient populations. Pharmacodynamic analyses have revealed a rapid onset of action and distinct peak (IAsp), followed by a separate, flat and stable basal effect (IDeg component). Phase 3 studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of IDegAsp, with greater glycemic improvements than basal-only therapy in international and Japanese type 2 diabetes populations. IDegAsp also results in reduced insulin dose requirements and lower rates of hypoglycemia than premixed insulin. EXPERT OPINION IDegAsp provides a simple and effective insulin regimen in appropriately selected Japanese patients, with the flexibility to suit individual needs. The benefits of IDegAsp over conventional insulin regimens might help tackle clinical inertia with insulin intensification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahisa Hirose
- a Division of Diabetes, Metabolism and Endocrinology, Department of Medicine , Toho University School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Takuya Awata
- b Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism , International University of Health and Welfare Hospital , Tochigi , Japan
| | - Yuiko Yamamoto
- c Medical & Scientific Affairs Department , Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Mads Peter Hemmingsen
- d Medical & Scientific Affairs Department , Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd ., Tokyo , Japan
| |
Collapse
|