Trends, management and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in chronic liver disease

Risk Factors, Use of Revascularization, and Outcomes in Young Adults With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

The incidence of acute myocardial infarction is increasing in younger age groups, with differences in treatment and outcomes based on gender. ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in young adults, however, is incompletely understood as most of the current studies were performed in homogenous populations, did not focus on STEMI, and lack direct comparisons with older adults. We performed a retrospective observational study using the Statewide Planning And Research Cooperative System for all admissions in New York State with a principal diagnosis of STEMI from 2011 to 2018. There were 58,083 STEMIs with the majority being male (68.2%) and non-Hispanic White (64.8%), with an average age of 63.9 ± 13.9 years. Of these, 8,494 (14.6%) occurred in patients aged <50 years. The proportion of STEMIs in women increased with age, from 19.2% in the <50-year-old age group to 48.9% in the ≥70-year-old age group. Young adults with STEMI had greater prevalence of obesity, current tobacco use, other substance use, and major psychiatric disorders, were more likely to receive revascularization, and had lower 1-year mortality than older age groups. Revascularization was associated with at least a 3 times lower odds ratio of 1-year mortality in all age groups. In conclusion, young adults with STEMI had a unique set of risk factors and co-morbidities and were more likely to undergo revascularization than older age groups. In all age groups, female gender was associated with a higher burden of co-morbidities, decreased use of revascularization, and increased 1-year mortality.

De Ritis ratio and long-term major cardiovascular adverse events in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

The association of aspartate aminotransferase to alanine aminotransferase ratio (De Ritis ratio) with clinical outcomes in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) remains unclear. This study aims to assess the association of De Ritis ratio with adverse cardiovascular events in patients with CCS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 5020 patients with CCS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients were categorized into groups according to tertiles of the De Ritis ratio: tertile 1 (De Ritis ratio: <.75; n = 1688 patients), tertile 2 (De Ritis ratio: .75-1.08; n = 1666 patients) and tertile 3 (De Ritis ratio: >1.08; n = 1666 patients). The primary endpoint was 3-year mortality.

RESULTS

At 3 years, there were 384 deaths, 176 myocardial infarctions and 61 strokes. In groups with De Ritis in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd tertiles, deaths occurred in 5.0%, 7.5% and 14.5% of the patients, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.09, 95% confidence interval [1.06-1.12], p < .001); myocardial infarctions occurred in 2.6%, 3.5% and 5.1% of the patients, respectively (p < .001); strokes occurred in 1.0%, 1.2% and 1.9% of the patients, respectively (p = .030); bleeding at 30 days (n = 112) occurred in 1.4%, 1.6% and 3.7% of the patients, respectively (p < .001). The C-statistic of the Cox proportional hazards model for all-cause mortality with baseline data without the De Ritis ratio was .815 [.794-.836] and .818 [.797-.838] after the inclusion of the De Ritis ratio (delta C-statistic = .003; p = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CCS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, an elevated De Ritis ratio was associated with long-term major adverse cardiovascular events.

Real-world management and outcomes of 7 million patients with acute coronary syndrome according to clinical research trial enrolment status: a propensity matched analysis

AIMS

We aimed to determine whether clinical outcomes and invasive care of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients participating in trials differed from those of non-participants, particularly including those who were trial eligible.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included all hospitalizations with a principal diagnosis of ACS in the US National Inpatient Sample between January 2004 and September 2015, stratified by trial enrolment and eligibility using the International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision. We conducted propensity score matching to investigate the following outcomes: all-cause mortality; major bleeding; stroke; composite of mortality, stroke, and cardiac complications [major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs)]; coronary angiography (CA); and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A total of 7 091 179 weighted ACS hospitalizations were analysed, including 19 684 (0.3%) trial participants and 7 071 495 non-participants (3 485 514 of whom were trial eligible). Trial participants were more likely to receive CA [Δ% 28.73%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 27.22-30.24, P < 0.001] and PCI (Δ% 27.13%, 95% CI 24.86-29.41, P < 0.001), with decreased mortality (Δ% -3.51%, 95% CI -4.72 to -2.31, P < 0.001), MACCEs (Δ% -3.04%, 95% CI -4.55 to -1.53, P < 0.001), and bleeding (Δ% -0.89%, 95% CI -1.59 to -0.19, P = 0.013) compared with non-participants. After accounting for eligibility, trial participants were more likely to undergo CA (Δ% 22.78%, 95% CI 21.58-23.99, P < 0.001) and PCI (Δ% 23.95%, 95% CI 21.77-26.13, P < 0.001), and had no difference in mortality (Δ% -0.21%, 95% CI -0.65 to 0.24, P = 0.362).

CONCLUSION

Among ACS patients, trial enrolment was associated with significantly greater invasive care and lower mortality than among matched non-participants. Trial participants were more likely to be invasively managed even when compared with eligible non-participants, even though there was no difference in mortality.

Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis

Liver cirrhosis (LC) is becoming increasingly common among patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and is associated with significant cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Management of such patients is complicated by LC related complications. Literature is scarce on the safety of antithrombotic regimens and invasive strategies for ACS in patients with LC, especially those undergoing liver transplant evaluation. Recently there has been evidence that cirrhosis is an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes in ACS. As patients with LC are generally excluded from large randomized trials, definitive guidelines for the management of ACS in this particular cohort are lacking. Many antithrombotic drugs require either hepatic activation or clearance; hence, an accurate assessment of hepatic function is required prior to initiation and dose adjustment. Despite a demonstrated survival benefit of optimal medical therapy and invasive revascularization techniques in LC patients with ACS, both strategies are currently underutilized in this population. This review aims to present currently available data and provide a practical, clinically oriented approach for the management of ACS in LC. Randomized clinical trials in LC patients with ACS are the need of the hour to further refine their management for favorable outcomes.