A retrospective audit of skin biopsies done in a tertiary care center in India

Dermatopathological Correlation of Clinically Challenging Cutaneous Lesions: a Single Center Experience of 2184 Cases

INTRODUCTION

Although a trained eye can easily identify typical skin lesions, histopathological examination and clinicopathological correlation are critical in challenging cases.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective is to organize the final diagnoses reached following clinicopathological consensus in clinically challenging cutaneous lesions, identifying the most common diagnostic scenarios encountered by dermatopathologists and discussing their diverse differentials submitted by clinicians. The secondary objective is to investigate how the case profile and clinician decision-making processes evolved during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

Skin and mucosa samples collected by the dermatology department between 2016 and 2020 were classified based on pathology reports. For frequent diagnoses, preliminary diagnoses stated by clinicians on pathology requisition forms were reviewed. The years preceding and following the first nationally reported COVID-19 case were compared to investigate the pandemic's impact on the distribution of dermatology and dermatopathology cases.

RESULTS

One thousand nine hundred and eighty-nine reports were classified into 4 major categories: inflammatory (49.8%), neoplastic (30.1%), other diseases (7.1%), and non-diagnostic (12.8%). We further classified inflammatory diseases based on major tissue reaction patterns and neoplasms based on cell origin. We analyzed the leading diagnoses in each category, discussed their differential diagnoses, and provided clinicians with clues to reduce errors in practice. Following the pandemic, the overall number of pathology reports and patient admissions dropped dramatically, with significant changes in case profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

We presented and discussed the frequently encountered confounding cases to sketch the diagnostic landscape. In the authors' experience, clinicopathological correlation can increase the rate of reaching the diagnosis by up to 75.3%.

Clinicopathological Concordance in 2216 Cases of Skin Biopsy over One Year: An Indian Experience

Introduction

To determine the spectrum of diseases and the level of clinicopathological concordance in skin biopsies received over a period of one year.

Methods

A total of 2216 skin biopsy cases received over a period of one year at a tertiary care center were retrospectively analyzed. The cases were further divided into further categories in levels of concordance based on the agreement between the clinical and histopathological diagnosis rendered.

Results

Of the cases, 61.01% showed clinicopathological concordance. Cases with a descriptive pathological diagnosis, not matching the clinical diagnosis, constituted 31.54%, whereas 4.02% of cases had a definitive pathological diagnosis, which was discordant with the clinical differentials; 3.29% biopsies were inadequate.

Conclusion

This study highlights the clinicopathological concordance in all the biopsies received from dermatology. It emphasizes the importance of skin biopsies in arriving at the diagnosis. However, it is a tool that must be used judiciously. Skin biopsies are also pivotal in flagging malignancies that may mimic benign lesions.